A NOTE ON TESTING THE SHOULDER CONDITION IN LINE TRANSECT SAMPLING
|
|
- Amie Beasley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 A NOTE ON TESTING THE SHOULDER CONDITION IN LINE TRANSECT SAMPLING Shunpu Zhang Department of Mathematical Sciences University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska, U.S.A ABSTRACT We propose a new method to examine the shoulder condition of the detection function in line transect sampling. This is an improvement on the method suggested in Mack (1998). We show that our method has a lower rejection rate (Type I error) when the data are in fact from a population satisfying the shoulder condition. It is also shown that our method is much more sensitive than Mack s method to the departures from the shoulder condition, therefore has a higher power. KEY WORDS: Line transect sampling, kernel density estimation; end point kernel, optimal bandwidth. 1. INTRODUCTION Line transect sampling is an important means to estimate population density or size in population biology. In line transect sampling, nonoverlapping strips, each of width 2w and length L, are placed at random in the region. An observer traverses the middle path of the strip and records the perpendicular distance (X i ) of each object sighted within the strip. Assume that a total of n objects has been sighted from all the strips and assume that objects on the transect line are seen with probability 1, then it turns out (Seber (1982), Burnham and Anderson (1976)) that the population density D satisfies the following relationship D = E(n)f(0) 2tL, (1.1) 1
2 where f(x), 0 x w, is the conditional density of the line transect distances, given the object is observed and t is the number of strips. In order to estimate D, one neeeds to estimate f(0). With an appropriate estimate of f(0),denoted by f(0), Dcan then be estimated by D = n ˆf(0) 2tL. (1.2) Various methods have been proposed to estimate f(0) in literature. Generally speaking, they can be divided into two categories: the parametric method and the nonparametric method. The parametric method specifies a parametric model for the detection function and uses the maximum likelihood technique to estimate the parameters in the model, more details about the parametric method can be found in Burnham and Anderson (1976), Pollock (1978), Quinn and Gallucci (1980), Burnham et al. (1980) and Buckland (1985). A popular nonparametric method is to approximate f(x) using a Fourier series(crain et al. (1979)). It is not necessary to specify a model when using the Fourier series method. The coefficients of the series are estimated from the data. The drawback of the Fourier series method is that one has to decide where the series needs to be truncated. In addition to this, the Fourier series method is famous for its inability to adapt to local variations in the true curve. Note that we only need to estimate f(0), it is obvious that the Fourier series method is not a good choice to estimate f(0). In recent years, researchers have turned their attention to look for nonparametric methods with better local performances. A popular method is the kernel method. Increasing applications of the kernel method are seen in various areas such as astronomy, ecology, econometric, water science, etc. Some initial efforts in applying the kernel method to wildlife sampling have been made by Buckland (1992), Quang (1993) and Chen (1994). Mack and Quang (1998) was the first to present a 2
3 rigorous unified study for the kernel estimation of wildlife abundance for both line and point transect sampling. However, the methods discussed above are all derived under the shoulder condition. Recent studies have shown that the shoulder condition may not hold for many wildlife line transect data such as whales, jack rabbits, capercaillies, cotton tails and impalas (Buckland (1985)), etc. Under these situations, the use of the above methods is not satisfactory due to the so-called boundary effects of the kernel method. Mack et al. (1999) noticed this problem and proposed to use the end point kernel method (Zhang and Karunamuni (1998)) to correct the boundary effect. It is demonstrated in Mack et al. (1999) that the end point kernel method outperforms the conventional kernel method developed under the shoulder condition greatly. Nevertheless, Zhang and Karunamuni (1998) pointed out that the end point kernel method has two intrinsic problems: 1) the use of the end point kernel always brings much larger variance than that from the conventional kernel method; 2) the end point kernel method may give negative estimates of the animal density, especially when the sample size is small. Zhang (2000) discussed how to correct these two problems in line transect sampling when using the kernel method. The above discussion shows that it is necessary to know whether or not the shoulder condition holds before analyzing the data. Mack (1998) suggested to test the shoulder condition using the kernel method. It is the first time in literature which formally discussed the problem of testing the shoulder condition using the nonparametric method. In this paper, we discuss the possibility of improving Mack (1998) s results. We will clarify some confusions in Mack s work. 3
4 2. TESTING THE SHOULDER CONDITION 2.1. What to test? Mack (1998) suggested to test the hypothesis H 0 : f (0 + )=0vsH a : f (0 + ) 0. Since we assume that the detectability decreases sharply as objects move away from the observer. It is enough to consider the one sided alternative H a : f (0 + ) < 0. Therefore, in this paper, we will only discuss how to test the following hypothesis: H 0 : f (0 + )=0 vsh a : f (0 + ) < 0. (2.1) The advantage of restricting our attention to the one sided alternative is that the power of the test will be higher than that from the two sided alternative, as we shall see in Section 4. To test the hypothesis (2.1), it is imperative to discuss the estimation of f (0 + ) How to estimate f (0 + )? In order to test f (0 + ) = 0, we need to find a good estimator for f (0 + ). The natural approach to estimate f (0 + ) is to use the kernel method using the order (1, 2) end point kernel K 1,2 : ˆf (0 + )= 1 ( ) 0 xi K1,2, (2.2) nh h where h is the bandwidth (h 0asn ). An order (v, k) endpointkernelis defined as follows, more details on the end point kernel can be found in Zhang and Karunamuni (1998, 1999). DEFINITION 2.1. An end point kernel K v,k is said to be of order (v, k) if 0, j =0,..., v 1,v+1,..., k 1 K v,k (t)t j dt = 1, j = v B v,k, j = k, (2.3) 4
5 where B v,k <. Mack (1998) suggested the following definition for the kernel K used in estimating f (0 + ). DEFINITION 2.2. The derivative kernel K should satisfy the following condition (let K be the antiderivative of K ): β α K is supported on <α<β 0 (2.4) K(α) = K(β) = 0 (2.5) v k K(v)dv =1, for k =0, for k =1. (2.6) β α (K (v)) 2 dv <. (2.7) The equation (2.6) above basically says that K(v) isanorder(0, 1) endpointkernel. Since for an order (0, 1) end point kernel K, differentiating K does not necessarily result in an order (1, 2) end point kernel for estimating f (0 + ). The condition (2.5) was cleverly added to guarantee K would be an order (1, 2) end point kernel. Compare this with Definition 2.1, it is obvious that Definition 2.1 is more appropriate in the sense that it is simpler and more formal. In fact, (2.5) in Definition 2.2 can be ralaxed to K(α) = K(β). An example of K satisfying Definition 2.2 with relaxed (2.5) is K(t) =a 6t 6t 2, for any real a 0. and For the estimator (2.2), standard arguments lead to E ˆf (0 + )=f (0 + )+ h 2 f (0 + ) K 1,2 (t)t 2 dt + o(h) (2.8) Var ˆf (0 + )= f(0+ ) nh 3 [K 1,2 (t)] 2 dt + o(1/nh 3 ). (2.9) 5
6 2.3. How to test the shoulder condition? The equation (2.8) implies that ˆf (0 + ) is an asymptotically unbiased estimator of f (0 + ). Therefore, under the null hypothesis H 0, it is natural to define the following T = ˆf (0 + ) Var ˆf (0 + ) (2.10) to test the null hypothesis H 0. Plug (2.9) in (2.10), we have T = = f(0 + ) ˆf (0 + ) nh 3 [K 1,2(t)] 2 nh 3 ˆf (0 + ) f(0 + ) [K. (2.11) 1,2(t)] 2 Under H 0 and the assumption that nh 5 0, it can be easily proved that T N(0, 1), asymptotically. (2.12) Note that f(0 + ) in (2.11) is unknown. In order to use T as a test statistic, it is necessary to estimate f(0 + ). With Definition 2.1 of the end point kernel, we estimate f(0 + )by ˆf(0 + )= 1 nh 0 K0,1 ( 0 xi h 0 ), (2.13) where K 0,1 is an order (0, 1) end point kernel. Two examples of order (0, 1) end point kernels are the half normal kernel and K 0,1 (t) = 2/πe t2 /2,t (, 0] K 0,1 (t) =1.5(1 t 2 ),t [ 1, 0]. 6
7 With f(0 + ) in (2.11) substituted by (2.13), the test statistic becomes T = nh 3 ˆf (0 + ) ˆf(0+ ) K2 1,2(t). (2.14) Similar to (2.12), under H 0 and the assumption that nh 5 0, we can prove that T N(0, 1), asymptotically. The test statistic (2.14) is the same as the equation (14) in Mack (1998) when K 1,2 is replaced by 1, 1 v 2 K (t) = 1, 2 v 1 0, otherwise. (2.15) It is easy to prove that K (t) is an order (1, 2) kernel. Mack (1998) reported simulated results for the test statistic T with the kernel K (t). The results showed that T worked satisfactorily for the random data simulated from a half normal population. At the significance level γ = 0.05, the sample rejection rates are for n = 60. Mack (1998) also applied the method to some real data such as the state data and the Hemingway s data and reported that the shoulder condition could not be rejected for the stake data, while it was rejected for the Hemingway s data. Since it is generally believed that the Hemingway s data satisfies the shoulder condition, the rejection of the shoulder condition from Mack s method came as a surprise. We re-did the calculation under the same setup as Mack s. We found two mistakes in Mack s calculation. One is the bandwidth used to estimate ˆf (0 + ). The bandwidth Mack (1998) used was , which was wrong. According to the formula b =ˆσn 1/4 which Mack (1998) used to calculate the bandwidth, the correct bandwidth should be The second mistake was the value of T. The value of T is with the correct bandwidth Even with the incorrect bandwidth , the value of 7
8 T is instead of as reported in Mack (1998). Apparently, the decimal point was misplaced. With the correct value of T, it is obvious that the shoulder condition is not rejected. 3. IMPROVEMENT ON MACK S METHOD Although Mack s method seems working fine from the discussion in Section 2.3, careful examination shows that the test has very low power. We carried out a simulation in which the random data were simulated from an exponential distribution. The rejection rate of H 0 is only 14%. This means that, with 86% of chance, Mack s method mistakenly classify the data from an exponential distribution as the data from a distribution which satisfies the shoulder condition. In this section, we will focus on how to improve the performance of Mack s method. The first step in improving Mack s method is to narrow the scope of the alternatives from H a : f (0 + ) 0to H a : f (0 + ) < 0, as we mentioned in Section 1. Further, we suggest to improve the performance of the test by using more appropriate kernels. Zhang (1999) and Zhang and Karunamuni (1999) showed that the best kernels for estimating f(0 + )andf (0 + ) in the sense of minimizing the mean squared error (MSE) for a certain class of kernels are K(t) = 3 2 (1 t2 ), for t [ 1, 0] (3.1) and K 1 (t) = 12(1 + 4t +3t 2 ), for t [ 1, 0], (3.2) respectively. 8
9 It is well-known that the optimal bandwidths for estimating f(0 + )andf (0 + ), under the assumption that f (0 + ) exists, are both in the order of O(n 1/5 ). However, the test statistic T defined by (2.14) does not converge to N(0, 1) with the optimal bandwidths. This is because the expected value of the numerator of T is E( nh 3 ˆf (0 + )) = O( nh 5 )=O(1) for h = O(n 1/5 ). Therefore we we have to require nh 5 0 in (2.14) to guarantee that T N(0, 1). Mack (1998) used the bandwidth in the order of O(n.25 ). This bandwidth converges to zero faster than the optimal bandwidth. Therefore, it allows the test statistic T to have more variability. As a result, it makes the method more reluctant to reject the null hypothesis ( i.e. the shoulder condition) and causes the low power of Mack s test. Note that (2.8) can be written as E{ ˆf (0 + ) h 2 f (0 + ) K 1,2 (t)t 2 dt} = f (0 + )+o(h). (3.3) If we can find a consistent estimator ˆf (0 + )off (0 + ), then it can be proved that E{ ˆf (0 + ) h 2 ˆf (0 + ) K 1,2 (t)t 2 dt} = f (0 + )+o(h). (3.4) Define ˆf new(0 + )= ˆf (0 + ) h 2 ˆf (0 + ) K 1,2 (t)t 2 dt. (3.5) The equations (2.8) and (3.4) show that ˆf new converges to f (0 + ) faster than ˆf (0 + ). Therefore, we can define the new test statistic as T new = Similar to (2.12), we can prove nh 3 ˆf new (0 + ) ˆf(0+ ). (3.6) 0 [K 1,2(t)dt] 2 T new N(0, 1), asymptotically, (3.7) 9
10 as h = O(n 1/5 ). Unfortunately, a consistent estimator of f (0 + ) with good performance is extremely difficult to find. We tried to use the boundary kernel method to estimate f (0 + ). However, the resulted estimator is too volatile to be used in practice. A practical way to estimate f (0 + ) is to use the reference density method (as often used in estimating bandwidth), more details about this method can be founnd in Silverman (1986). Since the null distribution is derived under H 0 (the shoulder condition), we suggest to use the half normal density g(t) = 2 πσ e t2 2σ 2 (3.8) as the reference density. Thus f (0 + ) will be estimated by 2/πˆσ 3 due to the fact that g (0 + )= 2/πσ 3,whereˆσ is the maximum likelihood estimator of σ with ˆσ = T/n, (3.9) where T = n i=1 x 2 i, see Buckland et al. (1994) for derivation of ˆσ. Substitute π/2ˆσ 3 for ˆf (0 + )in ˆf new(0 + ) defined by (3.5) and plug ˆf new(0 + ) into (3.6), we obtain the following T = nh3 [ ˆf (0 + )+ h 2/πˆσ 3 2 K 1,2(t)t 2 dt] ˆf(0+ ). (3.10) 0 [K 1,2] 2 (t) The estimator π/2ˆσ 3 from the reference density method is not a consistent estimator of f (0 + ) if the true density is different from the half normal density. Therefore, T does not converge to N(0, 1) for h = O(n 1/5 ). However, the problem canbefixedbyrequiring nh 5 0. But at this time, we only require a much milder correction, say h = O(n 0.21 ), compared to h = O(n 0.25 ) in Mack (1998). 10
11 With the above discussion, it is easy to see that under the null hypothesis H 0 as h satisfies nh 5 0. Hence the rejection rule for H 0 is: T N(0, 1), asymptotically, (3.11) Reject H 0 if T< z γ at the significance level γ, wherez γ is the z critical value. The last step in improving Mack s method is to use the optimal bandwidths when estimating f(0 + )andf (0 + ). A common measure of assessing the performance of an estimator ˆf(x) atthepointx for f(x) is the Mean Squared Error (MSE), defined by Siverman (1986) showed that MSE( ˆf(x)) = E( ˆf(x) f(x)) 2. (3.12) MSE( ˆf(x)) = (E ˆf(x) f(x)) 2 +Var(ˆf(x)). (3.13) The first term (without the square) E ˆf(x) f(x) in (3.13) is called the bias of the estimator, and the second term Var( ˆf(x)) is called the variance of the estimator. Applying standard arguments, similar to that in the derivation of (2.8), (2.9), to ˆf(0 + ), we obtain E ˆf(x) f(x) = h2 2 f (0 + ) K 0,1 (t)t 2 dt + o(h 2 ) and Var ˆf(0 + )= f(0+ ) nh [K 0,1 (t)] 2 dt + o(1/nh). Plug the above two equations into (3.13), we have MSE( ˆf(0 + )) = h4 4 [f (0 + )] 2 [ K 0,1 (t)t 2 dt] 2 + f(0+ ) 0 [K 0,1 (t)] 2 dt. (3.14) nh 11
12 Minimizing (3.14) w.r.t. h, the optimal bandwidth for estimating f(0 + )is ( h 0 = [K 0,1(t)] 2 dtf(0 + ) 1/5 ) [ K n 1/5. (3.15) 0,1(t)t 2 dt] 2 [f (0 + )] 2 Similarly, we can obtain MSE( ˆf (0 + )) = h2 4 [f (0 + )] 2 [ K 1,2 (t)t 2 dt] 2 + f(0+ ) 0 [K nh 3 1,2 (t)] 2 dt (3.16) and the optimal bandwidth for estimating f (0 + )is ( 6 0 h = [K 1,2(t)] 2 dtf(0 + ) 1/5 ) [ K n 1/5. (3.17) 1,2(t)t 2 dt] 2 [f (0 + )] 2 The bandwidths h 0 and h are not available since f(0 + )andf (0 + ) in (3.15) and (3.17) are unknown. A well-known method of estimating the bandwidth in density estimation is the least square cross-validation method. However, it is a global estimate, using the same bandwidth at each point of estimation. Since it is our intention to estimate f(0 + )andf (0 + ) only, a local bandwidth selector would be more appropriate. Recently, Gerard and Schucany (1999) discussed the estimation problem of the local bandwidth for estimating f(0 + ) under the shoulder condition. Surprisingly, the reference density bandwidth selector using the half normal density as the reference density uniformly performs better than their proposed estimator. Therefore, we decide to use the reference density method to estimate as we used to estimate f (0 + ) in (3.10). f(0 + ) [f (0 + )] 2 in (3.15) and (3.17) With the half normal density as the reference density, it is seen that f(0 + ) [f (0 + )] = π/2σ 5. (3.18) 2 12
13 Plug (3.17) into (3.15) and (3.17) with σ replaced by its maximum likelihood estimator ˆσ defined by (3.9), we obtain the estimators of h and h 0 as follows ĥ = ( 6 π [K 0,1(t)] 2 dt 2[ K 1,2(t)t 2 dt] 2 ) 1/5 ˆσn 1/5 (3.19) and ĥ 0 = ( π [K 0,1(t)] 2 dt 2[ K 0,1(t)t 2 dt] 2 ) 1/5 ˆσn 1/5. (3.20) The bandwidth ĥ0 defined above will be used in Section 4 as the bandwidth to estimate f(0 + ) in the test statistic T defined by (3.10). Since the bandwidth used to estimate f (0 + ) should be in the order of o(n 1/5 ) (see discussion circa (3.10)), we use the following modified bandwidth ĥ1 to estimate f (0 + ) in the test statistic T : where ĥ is the bandwidth defined by (3.19). 4. SIMULATIONS ĥ 1 = ĥn 0.01, (3.21) In this section, we investigate the performance of the test statistic T by simulations. The optimal end point kernels (3.1) and (3.2) are used to estimate f(0 + )and f (0 + ), respectively. With these two kernels, the test statistic T becomes T = nĥ3 1[ ˆf (0 + )+ 2πĥ1 ˆσ 3 ] 5 96f(0 ˆ, (4.1) + )/5 where ˆf (0 + )and ˆf(0 + ) are defined by (2.2) and (2.13), and h 0 and h 1 are estimated by (3.20 ) and (3.21), respectively. For the kernels defined by (3.1) and (3.2), simple algebra shows that ĥ 0 =(15 2π) 1/5ˆσn 1/5 (4.2) 13
14 and where ˆσ is defined by (3.9). ĥ 1 =(90 2π) 1/5ˆσn 1.05/5, (4.3) Example 1. (Simulated data) samples of size 40 and 80 were simulated from a half normal density 2 f(x) = e x 2 πσ 2 2σ 2,x>0 0, otherwise. (4.4) The value of σ used in the simulation was 3. At the significance level α =0.05, we compared the performance of T defined by (4.1) with that of Mack s test statistic T (see (2.14) and (2.15) of this paper, or (14) of Mack (1998) s). The bandwidths used in our method were determined by (4.2) and (4.3). The bandwidth used in Mack s method was h =ˆσn 1/5, as suggested in Mack (1998), where ˆσ was defined to be the sample standard deviation. Note that only one bandwidth is required in Mack s method. Table 1 below shows that the sample rejection rates of T are lower than T s, and the sample rejection rates of T s are closer to α. This shows that our method is more conservative than Mack s method when the true data are from a half normal distribution. This is an advantage over Mack s method because it is our purpose to make fewer mistakes when we know that the null hypothesis H 0 is true. The only concern remains now is whether or not our method is also more conservative than Mack s method when the null hypothesis H 0 is false. To clarify this issue, we generated 1000 sample of size 40 and 80 from the exponential density f(x) = { λe λx,x>0 0, otherwise (4.5) with λ = 1/
15 Using the same method of choosing bandwidths as above, it was shown that the power (rejection rate) of our suggested method was more than twice higher than Mack s method for the sample size =40, and more than three times higher than Mack s method for the sample size =80. This means that our method is much more sensitive to the departure of the distribution from the half normal distribution than Mack s method. The results are also reported in Table 1 below. Table 1 - A Comparison between Our Method and Mack s Method Sample Method Rejection Rate at α = Power of the size 0.05 Test 40 Our method Mack s method Our method Mack s method Table 1 shows that our method is superior to Mack s method from both the rejection rate when H 0 is in fact true (Type I error) and the power when H 0 is false. It can also be seen that both methods improve when the sample size increases, and it seems that our method improves faster than Mack s method. To see how our method works in practice, we also applied our method to two well-known data sets, the Stakes data and the Hemingway s data, detailed description of the two data sets can be found in Buckland et al (1988). For both data, our method show the existence of a shoulder, which is consistent with other researchers findings. REFERENCES Buckland, S. T. (1985). Perpendicular distance models for line transect sampling. Biometrics, 41, Buckland, S. T. (1992). Fitting density functions using polynomials. Applied Statistics, 41,
16 Buckland, S. T., Anderson D. R., Burnham, K. P. and Laake, J. L. (1993). Distance Sampling, London: Chapman and Hall. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. (1976) Mathematical models for nonparametric influences from line transect data. Biometrics, 32, Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. and Laake, J. L. (1980). Estimation of density from line transect sampling of biological populations. Wildlife Monographs, No. 72. Chen, S.X. (1996). Studying school size effects in line transect sampling using the kernel method. Biometrics, 52, Crain, B. R., Burnham, K. P, Anderson, D. R. and Laake, J. L. (1979). Nonparametric estimation of population density for line transect sampling using Fourier series. Biom.J., 21, Gerard, P. D. and Schucany, W. R. (1999). Local bandwidth selection for kernel estimation of population densities with line transect sampling. Technical report. Mack, Y. P. (1998). Testing for the shoulder condition in line transect sampling. Comm. Statist. A, 27, Mack, Y. P. and Quang, P. X. (1998). Kernel methods in line and point transect samplings. Biometrics, 50, Mack, Y.P., Quang, P. X. and Zhang S. (1999). Kernel estimation in transect sampling without the shoulder condition. Comm. Statist., A, 28, Pollock, K. H. (1978). A family of density estimators for line-transect sampling. Biometrics, 34, Quinn, T. J. and Vincent, F. G. (1980). Parametric models for line-transect estimators of abundance. Ecology, 61, Quang, P. X. (1993). Nonparametric estimators for variable circular plot surveys. Biometrics, 49, Seber, G. A. F. (1982). The estimation of Animal Abundance, (2nd ed.) London: Griffin. Silverman B. W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis, London: Chapman and Hall. Zhang, S. (1999). Some thoughts on estimating the density function under the shoulder condition. Technical reports, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Zhang, S. (2000). Improvements on the kernel estimation in line transect sampling without the shoulder condition. Statistics and Probability Letters, 53, Zhang, S. and Karunamuni, R. J. (1998), On Kernel Density Estimation Near Endpoints. Journal of Statistical Planning and inference, 70,
17 Zhang, S. and Karunamuni, R. J. (1999), On nonparametric density estimation at the boundary. Nonparametric Statistics, 12, Zhang, S., Karunamuni, R.J. and Jones, M. C. (1999). An improved estimator of the density function at the Boundary. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 94,
Akaike Information Criterion to Select the Parametric Detection Function for Kernel Estimator Using Line Transect Data
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Volume 12 Issue 2 Article 21 11-1-2013 Akaike Information Criterion to Select the Parametric Detection Function for Kernel Estimator Using Line Transect Data
More informationDouble Kernel Method Using Line Transect Sampling
AUSTRIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS Volume 41 (2012), Number 2, 95 103 Double ernel Method Using Line Transect Sampling Omar Eidous and M.. Shakhatreh Department of Statistics, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
More informationDo Markov-Switching Models Capture Nonlinearities in the Data? Tests using Nonparametric Methods
Do Markov-Switching Models Capture Nonlinearities in the Data? Tests using Nonparametric Methods Robert V. Breunig Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Social Sciences and School of
More informationMinimum Hellinger Distance Estimation in a. Semiparametric Mixture Model
Minimum Hellinger Distance Estimation in a Semiparametric Mixture Model Sijia Xiang 1, Weixin Yao 1, and Jingjing Wu 2 1 Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA 66506-0802.
More informationLecture 7 Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory
Lecture 7 Introduction to Statistical Decision Theory I-Hsiang Wang Department of Electrical Engineering National Taiwan University ihwang@ntu.edu.tw December 20, 2016 1 / 55 I-Hsiang Wang IT Lecture 7
More informationA Novel Nonparametric Density Estimator
A Novel Nonparametric Density Estimator Z. I. Botev The University of Queensland Australia Abstract We present a novel nonparametric density estimator and a new data-driven bandwidth selection method with
More informationA New Procedure for Multiple Testing of Econometric Models
A New Procedure for Multiple Testing of Econometric Models Maxwell L. King 1, Xibin Zhang, and Muhammad Akram Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics Monash University, Australia April 2007
More informationA nonparametric method of multi-step ahead forecasting in diffusion processes
A nonparametric method of multi-step ahead forecasting in diffusion processes Mariko Yamamura a, Isao Shoji b a School of Pharmacy, Kitasato University, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan. b Graduate School
More informationMath 494: Mathematical Statistics
Math 494: Mathematical Statistics Instructor: Jimin Ding jmding@wustl.edu Department of Mathematics Washington University in St. Louis Class materials are available on course website (www.math.wustl.edu/
More informationLocal linear multiple regression with variable. bandwidth in the presence of heteroscedasticity
Local linear multiple regression with variable bandwidth in the presence of heteroscedasticity Azhong Ye 1 Rob J Hyndman 2 Zinai Li 3 23 January 2006 Abstract: We present local linear estimator with variable
More informationBoundary Correction Methods in Kernel Density Estimation Tom Alberts C o u(r)a n (t) Institute joint work with R.J. Karunamuni University of Alberta
Boundary Correction Methods in Kernel Density Estimation Tom Alberts C o u(r)a n (t) Institute joint work with R.J. Karunamuni University of Alberta November 29, 2007 Outline Overview of Kernel Density
More informationSTATS 200: Introduction to Statistical Inference. Lecture 29: Course review
STATS 200: Introduction to Statistical Inference Lecture 29: Course review Course review We started in Lecture 1 with a fundamental assumption: Data is a realization of a random process. The goal throughout
More informationStatistical inference
Statistical inference Contents 1. Main definitions 2. Estimation 3. Testing L. Trapani MSc Induction - Statistical inference 1 1 Introduction: definition and preliminary theory In this chapter, we shall
More informationIf we want to analyze experimental or simulated data we might encounter the following tasks:
Chapter 1 Introduction If we want to analyze experimental or simulated data we might encounter the following tasks: Characterization of the source of the signal and diagnosis Studying dependencies Prediction
More informationFour aspects of a sampling strategy necessary to make accurate and precise inferences about populations are:
Why Sample? Often researchers are interested in answering questions about a particular population. They might be interested in the density, species richness, or specific life history parameters such as
More informationLectures 5 & 6: Hypothesis Testing
Lectures 5 & 6: Hypothesis Testing in which you learn to apply the concept of statistical significance to OLS estimates, learn the concept of t values, how to use them in regression work and come across
More informationBias Variance Trade-off
Bias Variance Trade-off The mean squared error of an estimator MSE(ˆθ) = E([ˆθ θ] 2 ) Can be re-expressed MSE(ˆθ) = Var(ˆθ) + (B(ˆθ) 2 ) MSE = VAR + BIAS 2 Proof MSE(ˆθ) = E((ˆθ θ) 2 ) = E(([ˆθ E(ˆθ)]
More informationConfidence intervals for kernel density estimation
Stata User Group - 9th UK meeting - 19/20 May 2003 Confidence intervals for kernel density estimation Carlo Fiorio c.fiorio@lse.ac.uk London School of Economics and STICERD Stata User Group - 9th UK meeting
More informationKernel density estimation
Kernel density estimation Patrick Breheny October 18 Patrick Breheny STA 621: Nonparametric Statistics 1/34 Introduction Kernel Density Estimation We ve looked at one method for estimating density: histograms
More informationNon-uniform coverage estimators for distance sampling
Abstract Non-uniform coverage estimators for distance sampling CREEM Technical report 2007-01 Eric Rexstad Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling Research Unit for Wildlife Population
More informationTeruko Takada Department of Economics, University of Illinois. Abstract
Nonparametric density estimation: A comparative study Teruko Takada Department of Economics, University of Illinois Abstract Motivated by finance applications, the objective of this paper is to assess
More informationNONPARAMETRIC DENSITY ESTIMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE LINEX LOSS FUNCTION
NONPARAMETRIC DENSITY ESTIMATION WITH RESPECT TO THE LINEX LOSS FUNCTION R. HASHEMI, S. REZAEI AND L. AMIRI Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Razi University, 67149, Kermanshah, Iran. ABSTRACT
More informationOn variable bandwidth kernel density estimation
JSM 04 - Section on Nonparametric Statistics On variable bandwidth kernel density estimation Janet Nakarmi Hailin Sang Abstract In this paper we study the ideal variable bandwidth kernel estimator introduced
More informationESTIMATION OF POPULATION SIZE FROM BIASED SAMPLES USING NON-PARAMETRIC BINARY REGRESSION
Statistica Sinica 12(2002), 505-518 ESTIMATION OF POPULATION SIZE FROM BIASED SAMPLES USING NON-PARAMETRIC BINARY REGRESSION Song Xi Chen and C. J. Lloyd National University of Singapore and Australian
More informationNonparametric Density Estimation. October 1, 2018
Nonparametric Density Estimation October 1, 2018 Introduction If we can t fit a distribution to our data, then we use nonparametric density estimation. Start with a histogram. But there are problems with
More informationDensity estimation Nonparametric conditional mean estimation Semiparametric conditional mean estimation. Nonparametrics. Gabriel Montes-Rojas
0 0 5 Motivation: Regression discontinuity (Angrist&Pischke) Outcome.5 1 1.5 A. Linear E[Y 0i X i] 0.2.4.6.8 1 X Outcome.5 1 1.5 B. Nonlinear E[Y 0i X i] i 0.2.4.6.8 1 X utcome.5 1 1.5 C. Nonlinearity
More informationDefect Detection using Nonparametric Regression
Defect Detection using Nonparametric Regression Siana Halim Industrial Engineering Department-Petra Christian University Siwalankerto 121-131 Surabaya- Indonesia halim@petra.ac.id Abstract: To compare
More informationNonparametric Econometrics
Applied Microeconometrics with Stata Nonparametric Econometrics Spring Term 2011 1 / 37 Contents Introduction The histogram estimator The kernel density estimator Nonparametric regression estimators Semi-
More informationNonparametric Methods
Nonparametric Methods Michael R. Roberts Department of Finance The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania July 28, 2009 Michael R. Roberts Nonparametric Methods 1/42 Overview Great for data analysis
More information41903: Introduction to Nonparametrics
41903: Notes 5 Introduction Nonparametrics fundamentally about fitting flexible models: want model that is flexible enough to accommodate important patterns but not so flexible it overspecializes to specific
More information1 Degree distributions and data
1 Degree distributions and data A great deal of effort is often spent trying to identify what functional form best describes the degree distribution of a network, particularly the upper tail of that distribution.
More informationLocal Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications
Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications J. Fan Department of Statistics University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, USA and I. Gijbels Institute of Statistics Catholic University oflouvain Louvain-la-Neuve,
More informationStatistics: Learning models from data
DS-GA 1002 Lecture notes 5 October 19, 2015 Statistics: Learning models from data Learning models from data that are assumed to be generated probabilistically from a certain unknown distribution is a crucial
More informationQuantitative Economics for the Evaluation of the European Policy. Dipartimento di Economia e Management
Quantitative Economics for the Evaluation of the European Policy Dipartimento di Economia e Management Irene Brunetti 1 Davide Fiaschi 2 Angela Parenti 3 9 ottobre 2015 1 ireneb@ec.unipi.it. 2 davide.fiaschi@unipi.it.
More informationStatistics - Lecture One. Outline. Charlotte Wickham 1. Basic ideas about estimation
Statistics - Lecture One Charlotte Wickham wickham@stat.berkeley.edu http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~wickham/ Outline 1. Basic ideas about estimation 2. Method of Moments 3. Maximum Likelihood 4. Confidence
More informationDiscussion Paper No. 28
Discussion Paper No. 28 Asymptotic Property of Wrapped Cauchy Kernel Density Estimation on the Circle Yasuhito Tsuruta Masahiko Sagae Asymptotic Property of Wrapped Cauchy Kernel Density Estimation on
More information1/24/2008. Review of Statistical Inference. C.1 A Sample of Data. C.2 An Econometric Model. C.4 Estimating the Population Variance and Other Moments
/4/008 Review of Statistical Inference Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University C. A Sample of Data C. An Econometric Model C.3 Estimating the Mean of a Population C.4 Estimating the Population
More informationMonte Carlo Integration using Importance Sampling and Gibbs Sampling
Monte Carlo Integration using Importance Sampling and Gibbs Sampling Wolfgang Hörmann and Josef Leydold Department of Statistics University of Economics and Business Administration Vienna Austria hormannw@boun.edu.tr
More informationA General Overview of Parametric Estimation and Inference Techniques.
A General Overview of Parametric Estimation and Inference Techniques. Moulinath Banerjee University of Michigan September 11, 2012 The object of statistical inference is to glean information about an underlying
More informationModel Selection for Semiparametric Bayesian Models with Application to Overdispersion
Proceedings 59th ISI World Statistics Congress, 25-30 August 2013, Hong Kong (Session CPS020) p.3863 Model Selection for Semiparametric Bayesian Models with Application to Overdispersion Jinfang Wang and
More informationDiscussion on Human life is unlimited but short by Holger Rootzén and Dmitrii Zholud
Extremes (2018) 21:405 410 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10687-018-0322-z Discussion on Human life is unlimited but short by Holger Rootzén and Dmitrii Zholud Chen Zhou 1 Received: 17 April 2018 / Accepted:
More informationDefinition 3.1 A statistical hypothesis is a statement about the unknown values of the parameters of the population distribution.
Hypothesis Testing Definition 3.1 A statistical hypothesis is a statement about the unknown values of the parameters of the population distribution. Suppose the family of population distributions is indexed
More informationexp{ (x i) 2 i=1 n i=1 (x i a) 2 (x i ) 2 = exp{ i=1 n i=1 n 2ax i a 2 i=1
4 Hypothesis testing 4. Simple hypotheses A computer tries to distinguish between two sources of signals. Both sources emit independent signals with normally distributed intensity, the signals of the first
More informationResearch Article A Nonparametric Two-Sample Wald Test of Equality of Variances
Advances in Decision Sciences Volume 211, Article ID 74858, 8 pages doi:1.1155/211/74858 Research Article A Nonparametric Two-Sample Wald Test of Equality of Variances David Allingham 1 andj.c.w.rayner
More informationPractice Problems Section Problems
Practice Problems Section 4-4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-10 Supplemental Problems 4-1 to 4-9 4-13, 14, 15, 17, 19, 0 4-3, 34, 36, 38 4-47, 49, 5, 54, 55 4-59, 60, 63 4-66, 68, 69, 70, 74 4-79, 81, 84 4-85,
More informationNonparametric confidence intervals. for receiver operating characteristic curves
Nonparametric confidence intervals for receiver operating characteristic curves Peter G. Hall 1, Rob J. Hyndman 2, and Yanan Fan 3 5 December 2003 Abstract: We study methods for constructing confidence
More informationIntroduction to Statistical Inference
Introduction to Statistical Inference Dr. Fatima Sanchez-Cabo f.sanchezcabo@tugraz.at http://www.genome.tugraz.at Institute for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Graz University of Technology, Austria Introduction
More informationInference on distributions and quantiles using a finite-sample Dirichlet process
Dirichlet IDEAL Theory/methods Simulations Inference on distributions and quantiles using a finite-sample Dirichlet process David M. Kaplan University of Missouri Matt Goldman UC San Diego Midwest Econometrics
More informationPolitical Science 236 Hypothesis Testing: Review and Bootstrapping
Political Science 236 Hypothesis Testing: Review and Bootstrapping Rocío Titiunik Fall 2007 1 Hypothesis Testing Definition 1.1 Hypothesis. A hypothesis is a statement about a population parameter The
More informationTest for Discontinuities in Nonparametric Regression
Communications of the Korean Statistical Society Vol. 15, No. 5, 2008, pp. 709 717 Test for Discontinuities in Nonparametric Regression Dongryeon Park 1) Abstract The difference of two one-sided kernel
More informationExam C Solutions Spring 2005
Exam C Solutions Spring 005 Question # The CDF is F( x) = 4 ( + x) Observation (x) F(x) compare to: Maximum difference 0. 0.58 0, 0. 0.58 0.7 0.880 0., 0.4 0.680 0.9 0.93 0.4, 0.6 0.53. 0.949 0.6, 0.8
More informationMA 575 Linear Models: Cedric E. Ginestet, Boston University Non-parametric Inference, Polynomial Regression Week 9, Lecture 2
MA 575 Linear Models: Cedric E. Ginestet, Boston University Non-parametric Inference, Polynomial Regression Week 9, Lecture 2 1 Bootstrapped Bias and CIs Given a multiple regression model with mean and
More informationNonparametric Density Estimation
Nonparametric Density Estimation Econ 690 Purdue University Justin L. Tobias (Purdue) Nonparametric Density Estimation 1 / 29 Density Estimation Suppose that you had some data, say on wages, and you wanted
More informationModel Specification Testing in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Time Series Econometrics. Jiti Gao
Model Specification Testing in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Time Series Econometrics Jiti Gao Department of Statistics School of Mathematics and Statistics The University of Western Australia Crawley
More informationAdaptive Kernel Estimation of The Hazard Rate Function
Adaptive Kernel Estimation of The Hazard Rate Function Raid Salha Department of Mathematics, Islamic University of Gaza, Palestine, e-mail: rbsalha@mail.iugaza.edu Abstract In this paper, we generalized
More informationLack-of-fit Tests to Indicate Material Model Improvement or Experimental Data Noise Reduction
Lack-of-fit Tests to Indicate Material Model Improvement or Experimental Data Noise Reduction Charles F. Jekel and Raphael T. Haftka University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA Gerhard Venter and
More informationRigorous Science - Based on a probability value? The linkage between Popperian science and statistical analysis
/3/26 Rigorous Science - Based on a probability value? The linkage between Popperian science and statistical analysis The Philosophy of science: the scientific Method - from a Popperian perspective Philosophy
More informationEstimation of a Neyman-Scott process from line transect data by a one-dimensional K-function
Estimation of a Neyman-Scott process from line transect data by a one-dimensional K-function Magne Aldrin Norwegian Computing Center, P.O. Box 114 Blindern, N-0314 Oslo, Norway email: magne.aldrin@nr.no
More informationOn a Nonparametric Notion of Residual and its Applications
On a Nonparametric Notion of Residual and its Applications Bodhisattva Sen and Gábor Székely arxiv:1409.3886v1 [stat.me] 12 Sep 2014 Columbia University and National Science Foundation September 16, 2014
More informationChapter 5 Confidence Intervals
Chapter 5 Confidence Intervals Confidence Intervals about a Population Mean, σ, Known Abbas Motamedi Tennessee Tech University A point estimate: a single number, calculated from a set of data, that is
More informationNonparametric Modal Regression
Nonparametric Modal Regression Summary In this article, we propose a new nonparametric modal regression model, which aims to estimate the mode of the conditional density of Y given predictors X. The nonparametric
More informationRecall the Basics of Hypothesis Testing
Recall the Basics of Hypothesis Testing The level of significance α, (size of test) is defined as the probability of X falling in w (rejecting H 0 ) when H 0 is true: P(X w H 0 ) = α. H 0 TRUE H 1 TRUE
More informationMultivariate Time Series: Part 4
Multivariate Time Series: Part 4 Cointegration Gerald P. Dwyer Clemson University March 2016 Outline 1 Multivariate Time Series: Part 4 Cointegration Engle-Granger Test for Cointegration Johansen Test
More informationRigorous Science - Based on a probability value? The linkage between Popperian science and statistical analysis
Rigorous Science - Based on a probability value? The linkage between Popperian science and statistical analysis The Philosophy of science: the scientific Method - from a Popperian perspective Philosophy
More informationPreface. 1 Nonparametric Density Estimation and Testing. 1.1 Introduction. 1.2 Univariate Density Estimation
Preface Nonparametric econometrics has become one of the most important sub-fields in modern econometrics. The primary goal of this lecture note is to introduce various nonparametric and semiparametric
More informationConfidence Intervals in Ridge Regression using Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods
Chapter 4 Confidence Intervals in Ridge Regression using Jackknife and Bootstrap Methods 4.1 Introduction It is now explicable that ridge regression estimator (here we take ordinary ridge estimator (ORE)
More informationParameter Estimation, Sampling Distributions & Hypothesis Testing
Parameter Estimation, Sampling Distributions & Hypothesis Testing Parameter Estimation & Hypothesis Testing In doing research, we are usually interested in some feature of a population distribution (which
More informationLocal regression I. Patrick Breheny. November 1. Kernel weighted averages Local linear regression
Local regression I Patrick Breheny November 1 Patrick Breheny STA 621: Nonparametric Statistics 1/27 Simple local models Kernel weighted averages The Nadaraya-Watson estimator Expected loss and prediction
More informationDensity estimators for the convolution of discrete and continuous random variables
Density estimators for the convolution of discrete and continuous random variables Ursula U Müller Texas A&M University Anton Schick Binghamton University Wolfgang Wefelmeyer Universität zu Köln Abstract
More informationSpace Telescope Science Institute statistics mini-course. October Inference I: Estimation, Confidence Intervals, and Tests of Hypotheses
Space Telescope Science Institute statistics mini-course October 2011 Inference I: Estimation, Confidence Intervals, and Tests of Hypotheses James L Rosenberger Acknowledgements: Donald Richards, William
More informationIEOR 165 Lecture 7 1 Bias-Variance Tradeoff
IEOR 165 Lecture 7 Bias-Variance Tradeoff 1 Bias-Variance Tradeoff Consider the case of parametric regression with β R, and suppose we would like to analyze the error of the estimate ˆβ in comparison to
More informationO Combining cross-validation and plug-in methods - for kernel density bandwidth selection O
O Combining cross-validation and plug-in methods - for kernel density selection O Carlos Tenreiro CMUC and DMUC, University of Coimbra PhD Program UC UP February 18, 2011 1 Overview The nonparametric problem
More informationA Note on Data-Adaptive Bandwidth Selection for Sequential Kernel Smoothers
6th St.Petersburg Workshop on Simulation (2009) 1-3 A Note on Data-Adaptive Bandwidth Selection for Sequential Kernel Smoothers Ansgar Steland 1 Abstract Sequential kernel smoothers form a class of procedures
More informationA nonparametric two-sample wald test of equality of variances
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 211 A nonparametric two-sample wald test of equality of variances David
More information1 Random walks and data
Inference, Models and Simulation for Complex Systems CSCI 7-1 Lecture 7 15 September 11 Prof. Aaron Clauset 1 Random walks and data Supposeyou have some time-series data x 1,x,x 3,...,x T and you want
More informationReliability of inference (1 of 2 lectures)
Reliability of inference (1 of 2 lectures) Ragnar Nymoen University of Oslo 5 March 2013 1 / 19 This lecture (#13 and 14): I The optimality of the OLS estimators and tests depend on the assumptions of
More informationChapter 9. Non-Parametric Density Function Estimation
9-1 Density Estimation Version 1.1 Chapter 9 Non-Parametric Density Function Estimation 9.1. Introduction We have discussed several estimation techniques: method of moments, maximum likelihood, and least
More informationLog-Density Estimation with Application to Approximate Likelihood Inference
Log-Density Estimation with Application to Approximate Likelihood Inference Martin Hazelton 1 Institute of Fundamental Sciences Massey University 19 November 2015 1 Email: m.hazelton@massey.ac.nz WWPMS,
More informationRigorous Science - Based on a probability value? The linkage between Popperian science and statistical analysis
/9/27 Rigorous Science - Based on a probability value? The linkage between Popperian science and statistical analysis The Philosophy of science: the scientific Method - from a Popperian perspective Philosophy
More informationThe Nonparametric Bootstrap
The Nonparametric Bootstrap The nonparametric bootstrap may involve inferences about a parameter, but we use a nonparametric procedure in approximating the parametric distribution using the ECDF. We use
More informationST5215: Advanced Statistical Theory
Department of Statistics & Applied Probability Wednesday, October 5, 2011 Lecture 13: Basic elements and notions in decision theory Basic elements X : a sample from a population P P Decision: an action
More informationSmooth simultaneous confidence bands for cumulative distribution functions
Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 2013 Vol. 25, No. 2, 395 407, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10485252.2012.759219 Smooth simultaneous confidence bands for cumulative distribution functions Jiangyan Wang
More informationDirection: This test is worth 250 points and each problem worth points. DO ANY SIX
Term Test 3 December 5, 2003 Name Math 52 Student Number Direction: This test is worth 250 points and each problem worth 4 points DO ANY SIX PROBLEMS You are required to complete this test within 50 minutes
More informationKernel density estimation for heavy-tailed distributions...
Kernel density estimation for heavy-tailed distributions using the Champernowne transformation Buch-Larsen, Nielsen, Guillen, Bolance, Kernel density estimation for heavy-tailed distributions using the
More informationSummary: the confidence interval for the mean (σ 2 known) with gaussian assumption
Summary: the confidence interval for the mean (σ known) with gaussian assumption on X Let X be a Gaussian r.v. with mean µ and variance σ. If X 1, X,..., X n is a random sample drawn from X then the confidence
More informationBasic Concepts of Inference
Basic Concepts of Inference Corresponds to Chapter 6 of Tamhane and Dunlop Slides prepared by Elizabeth Newton (MIT) with some slides by Jacqueline Telford (Johns Hopkins University) and Roy Welsch (MIT).
More informationLINE TRANSECT SAMPLING FROM A CURVING PATH
LINE TRANSECT SAMPLING FROM A CURVING PATH LEX HIBY Conservation Research Ltd., 110 Hinton Way, Great Shelford, Cambridge, England email: hiby@ntlworld.com and M. B. KRISHNA Wildlife Conservation Society
More informationChapter 9. Non-Parametric Density Function Estimation
9-1 Density Estimation Version 1.2 Chapter 9 Non-Parametric Density Function Estimation 9.1. Introduction We have discussed several estimation techniques: method of moments, maximum likelihood, and least
More information6 Single Sample Methods for a Location Parameter
6 Single Sample Methods for a Location Parameter If there are serious departures from parametric test assumptions (e.g., normality or symmetry), nonparametric tests on a measure of central tendency (usually
More informationThe University of Hong Kong Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science STAT2802 Statistical Models Tutorial Solutions Solutions to Problems 71-80
The University of Hong Kong Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science STAT2802 Statistical Models Tutorial Solutions Solutions to Problems 71-80 71. Decide in each case whether the hypothesis is simple
More informationEstimation of Parameters
CHAPTER Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers and Scientists FUNDAMENTALS OF STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Second Edition A. J. Clark School of Engineering Department of Civil and Environmental
More informationSolutions to Practice Test 2 Math 4753 Summer 2005
Solutions to Practice Test Math 4753 Summer 005 This test is worth 00 points. Questions 5 are worth 4 points each. Circle the letter of the correct answer. Each question in Question 6 9 is worth the same
More information401 Review. 6. Power analysis for one/two-sample hypothesis tests and for correlation analysis.
401 Review Major topics of the course 1. Univariate analysis 2. Bivariate analysis 3. Simple linear regression 4. Linear algebra 5. Multiple regression analysis Major analysis methods 1. Graphical analysis
More informationWooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Appendix C: Fundamentals of mathematical statistics
Wooldridge, Introductory Econometrics, 4th ed. Appendix C: Fundamentals of mathematical statistics A short review of the principles of mathematical statistics (or, what you should have learned in EC 151).
More informationNonparametric Density Estimation (Multidimension)
Nonparametric Density Estimation (Multidimension) Härdle, Müller, Sperlich, Werwarz, 1995, Nonparametric and Semiparametric Models, An Introduction Tine Buch-Kromann February 19, 2007 Setup One-dimensional
More informationSlack and Net Technical Efficiency Measurement: A Bootstrap Approach
Slack and Net Technical Efficiency Measurement: A Bootstrap Approach J. Richmond Department of Economics University of Essex Colchester CO4 3SQ U. K. Version 1.0: September 2001 JEL Classification Code:
More informationStatistica Sinica Preprint No: SS
Statistica Sinica Preprint No: SS-017-0013 Title A Bootstrap Method for Constructing Pointwise and Uniform Confidence Bands for Conditional Quantile Functions Manuscript ID SS-017-0013 URL http://wwwstatsinicaedutw/statistica/
More informationNonparametric Identi cation and Estimation of Truncated Regression Models with Heteroskedasticity
Nonparametric Identi cation and Estimation of Truncated Regression Models with Heteroskedasticity Songnian Chen a, Xun Lu a, Xianbo Zhou b and Yahong Zhou c a Department of Economics, Hong Kong University
More informationESTIMATORS IN THE CONTEXT OF ACTUARIAL LOSS MODEL A COMPARISON OF TWO NONPARAMETRIC DENSITY MENGJUE TANG A THESIS MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS
A COMPARISON OF TWO NONPARAMETRIC DENSITY ESTIMATORS IN THE CONTEXT OF ACTUARIAL LOSS MODEL MENGJUE TANG A THESIS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS PRESENTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
More informationEXAMINERS REPORT & SOLUTIONS STATISTICS 1 (MATH 11400) May-June 2009
EAMINERS REPORT & SOLUTIONS STATISTICS (MATH 400) May-June 2009 Examiners Report A. Most plots were well done. Some candidates muddled hinges and quartiles and gave the wrong one. Generally candidates
More information