Summary of laboratory means
|
|
- Gerald Alexander
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ringversuch VOC 2011 Summary of laboratory means Sample sample 1 NBUAC Z score NHEPTAN Z score TOLUOL Z score PXYLOL Z score NDODECAN Z score TETRADEC Measurement unit 23,9 2,6 35,400 5,900 75,1 18,864 21,9 2,9 12,400-1,386 18,8 19,000 0,754 19,0 0,291 20,100 0,162 16,900 0,498 15,9 0,125 20,7 21,0 1,731 20,0 0,610 21,0 0,8 20,0 2,024 20,000 1,8 25,000 15,3-0,671 24,9 2,190 19,800 0,0 16,0 0,328 14,100-0,662 20,3 15,800-0,496 20,0 0,451 15,6-1,3 14,8-0,371 16,0 0,274 11,0 13,5-1,374 13,0-1,4 13,0-2,233 12,1-1,516 12,2-1,4 14,8 18,2 0,461,100 1,178 19,5-0,025 18,1 1,028 12,9-1,152 11,5 14,0-1,003 24,4 2,013 15,000-1,571 11,9-1,0 16,3 0,296 15,1 42,000 9,737,0 1,320 29,000 3, 35,0 8,383 24,000 3,553 28,0 18,5 0,578 19,5 0,273 23,8 1,436 16,8 0,477 17,6 0,849 20,100 13,0-1,472 11,0-2,549 7,100-4,255 11,800-1,664 16,700 0,5 7,0 1 18,775 0,666 19,535 0,2 20,895 0,432 18,2 1,062 17,020 0,581 18,880 11,0-2,136 10,7-2,851 6,0-4,526 9,5-2,618 10,9-2,004 12,8 20,400 1,1 21,900 1,107 21,1 0,519 14,800-0,392 17,200 0,658 21,400 16,1-0,359,0 9,059 29,0 3,355 14,100-0,9 12,9-1,152 14,7 13,0-1,3 21,000 0,788 26,000 2,166 12,0-1,367 6,0-3,899 8,0 8,0-3,347 11,000-2,762 19,0-0,042 19,0 1,0 16,000 0,147 24,000 19,000 0,754,000 1,143 62,0 14,566 12,0-1,367 10,0-2,195 13,0 20,400 1,1 25,700 2,456 24,0 1,589 19,000 1,388 18,1 1,062 20,000 21,0 1,770 19,0 0,156,710 3,766 28,520 5,424 17,805 0,915 20, 17,0 0,1 18,0-0,099 17,000-0,891 15,000-0,7 15,0-0,066 18,0 19,0 0,9 17,0-0,454 18,0-0,382 16,0 0,328 17,000 0,573 20,0 16,200-0,339 15,900-1,0 15,700-1,333 17,000 0,540 17,6 0,849 20,700 16,5-0,203 10,7-2,851 13,0-2, 14,900-0,3 17,200 0,658 17,700 Page 1
2 Ringversuch VOC NBUAC Z score NHEPTAN Z score TOLUOL Z score PXYLOL Z score NDODECAN Z score TETRADEC 18,0 0,559 20,000 0,433 19,000-0,212 16,0 0,328 17,0 0,785 21,000 Method Assessment Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 17,069 18,780 19,623 15,725 15,655 17,855 Reproducibility s.d. 3,599 4,731 4,737 3,298 2,755 4,497 Rel. reproducibility s.d. 21,08 % 25,19 % 24,14 % 20,97 % 17,59 % 25,19 % Reference value 18,0 17,0 16,900 16,000 16,0 20,900 Target s.d. 2,5 2,817 2,4 2,359 2,348 2,678 Rel. target s.d. 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % Low er limit of tolerance 11,8 13,146 13,736 11,008 10,959 12,498 Upper limit of tolerance,190 24,414 25,510 20,3 20,352 23,211 Low er confidence limit 15,7 16,865 17,8 14,432 14,5 16,088 Upper confidence limit 18,1 20,695 21,559 17,019 16,706 19,621 Type B outliers Type outliers No. of laboratories w ith E outliers Intermed. s.d. Explanation of outlier types A: Single outlier B: Differing laboratory mean C: excessive laboratory s.d. D: Excluded manually E: score outside tolerance limits : Score >3,5 Z score BUETOH Z score TRIMEBEN Z score CAREN Z score DMCPS Z score Measurement unit 0,372 38,4 10,0 15,3 0,006 15,9-1, 29,4 5,419 Page 2
3 Ringversuch VOC Z score BUETOH Z score TRIMEBEN Z score CAREN Z score DMCPS Z score 1,081 19,5 1,840 16,4 0,484 24,6 1,678 19,0 1,254 2,6 18,0 1,383,000 2,896 25,0 1,966 19,0 1,336 0,932 13,0-0,749 16,2 0,397,2 0,866 17,8 0,659-2,335 12,3-1,293 12,8-1,081 17,5-0,725 18,800 1,049-1,1 12,200-1,358 11,0-1,755 16,400-1,115 13,0-1,085-2,354 31,3 6,974 16,5 0,527 20,2 0, 17,800 0,8-1,010 9,100-2,707 16,4 0,484 18,900-0,2 10,200-2,481 3,975 26,000 4,646 26,0 4,852 36,000 5,520 36,0 8,312 0,838 19,6 1,883 17,0 0,984 23,5 1,6 18,2 0,823-3,829 12,0-1,315 10,400-2,146 16,0-1,081 14,000-0, ,383 18,165 1, 15,775 0,190 20,475 0,265 17,280 0,425-1,869 18,9 1,579 10,4-2,124 12,7-2,3 11,1-2,091 1,324 16,200 0,382 17,1 0,788,100 0,815 18,0 0,741-1,159 15,200-0,053 11,0-1,624 16,3-1,132 12,5-1,516-3,493 11,0-1,6 11,0-1,6 15,000-1,589 9,0-2,7 2,295 6,0-3,838 20,0 2,2 20,000 0,104 36,0 8,312-1,626 8,0-2,9 12,0-1,233 13,000-2,266 13,000-1,332 0,801 14,400-0,401 17,4 0,918 27,1 2,524 21,2 2,054 0,866 49,810 15,006,0 3,113 20,855 0,393 20,510 1,7 0,241 7,000-3,621 14,0-0,364 16,0-1,081 15,000-0,511 0,988 17,000 0,7 15,0 0,071 20,0 0,273 18,000 0,720 1,062 18,6 1,8 17,3 0,5 21,900 0,747 17,200 0,392-0,058 18,0 1,296 14,700-0,277 23,5 1,6 17,0 0,556 1,174 17,000 0,7 15,000-0,147 21,000 0,2 17,000 0,310 Method Assessment Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 15,3 15,337 19,693 16,245 Reproducibility s.d. 3,612 3,285 3,918 3,628 Rel. reproducibility s.d. 23,57 % 21,42 % 19,89 %,33 % Reference value 16,900 16,0 20,900 18,0 Target s.d. 2,298 2,1 2,954 2,437 Page 3
4 Ringversuch VOC Z score BUETOH Z score TRIMEBEN Z score CAREN Z score DMCPS Z score Rel. target s.d. 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % Low er limit of tolerance 10,725 10,736 13,785 11,372 Upper limit of tolerance 19,918 19,938 25,1 21,119 Low er confidence limit 13,697 14,041 18,118 14,818 Upper confidence limit 16,7 16,4 21,2 17,672 Type B outliers Type outliers No. of laboratories w ith E outliers Intermed. s.d. Explanation of outlier types A: Single outlier B: Differing laboratory mean C: excessive laboratory s.d. D: Excluded manually E: score outside tolerance limits : Score >3,5 Page 4
5 Ringversuch VOC Summary of laboratory means Sample sample 2 NBUAC Z score NHEPTAN Z score TOLUOL Z score PXYLOL Z score NDODECAN Z score TETRADEC Measurement unit 43,4 0,814 56,2 3,9 124,0 15,740 37,700 0,719 47,5 0,3,900 42,4 0,642 41,0 0,711 42,800 1,0 36,0 0,3 49,4 0,610 36,4 51,000 2,114,0 1,5 46,0 1,695 45,0 2,247 62,000 2,456 43,000 31,000-1,329 43,000 0,959 36,7-0,058 35,6 0,317 43,0-0,266 34,1 31,5-1, 36,7-0,149,2-1,7 28,0-1,084 45,8 0,080 18,4,7-1,372 29,400-1,453,000-1,272 28,0-1,084 37,200-1,193 25,0 36,9-0,5 36,9-0,114 32,6-0,795 32,1-0,3 41,8-0,9 26,400 34,400-0,7 46,4 1,571 33,2-0,6 29,4-0,897 24,2-3,098 12,800 56,0 3,061 32,000-0,992 36,0-0,103 47,000 2,541 48,000 0,396 34,0 39,3 0,108 38,700 0,197 35,900-0,211 34,900 0,,7 0,801 33,4 28,3-1,786 35,3-0,397 32,0-0,8 24,200-1,926 40,3-0,729,0 1 42,0 0,573 38,5 0,112 43,525 1,1 39,995 1,1 48,815 0,516 31, 26,100-2,173 23,700-2,464 19,000-3,2,800-2,200 34,200-1,4,200 45,000 1,081 47,0 1,757 45,5 1,524 33,5-0,0 55,7 1,537 38,000 36,900-0,314 42,800 0,924 41,2 0,751 32,200-0,359 39,700-0,825 26,100 29,0-1,588,0-1,258 31,000-1,092 26,000-1,573 31,0-2,032 17,000 16,0-3,826 20,0-3,031 36,0-0,103 38,0 0,5,0-0,119 37,000,0-1,415 29,000-1,524 53,000 2,864 25,0-1,671 27,000-2,6 23,000,8 1,055 47,9 1,837,700 1,372 39,4 1,062 53,700 1, 33,2,5 0,961 42,4 0,862 66,610 5,312,410 5,1 51,640 0,932 36,475 40,0 0,6 39,0 0,339 38,000 0,167 36,000 0,386 49,000 0,5 32,000 43,000 0,737 36,000-0,282 37,0 0,077 36,000 0,386 52,0 1,059 34,0 40,100 0, 35,700-0,335 37,0-0,004 35,700 0,327,5 0,772 34,6 36,2-0,425 25,200-2,197 28,0-1,542 32,400-0,320 49,5 0,624,2 Page 5
6 Ringversuch VOC NBUAC Z score NHEPTAN Z score TOLUOL Z score PXYLOL Z score NDODECAN Z score TETRADEC,0 0,995 42,000 0,782 40,000 0,526 38,0 0,5 53,0 1,206 34,0 Method Assessment Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 38,721 37,591 37,073 34,031 45,6,3 Reproducibility s.d. 7,649 8,8 7,693 6,409 9,435 6,724 Rel. reproducibility s.d. 19,75 % 23,49 % 20,75 % 18,83 % 20,82 % 21,95 % Reference value 40,000 35,900 35,0 33,0 51,400 35,200 Target s.d. 5,808 5,9 5,561 5,105 6,796 4,595 Rel. target s.d. 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % Low er limit of tolerance 27,105 26,314 25,951 23,8 31,714 21,3 Upper limit of tolerance,337 48,8 48,195,240 58,898 39,8 Low er confidence limit 35,646 34,9 34,038 31,491 41,675 27,937 Upper confidence limit 41,796 40,953 40,107 36,571 48,938 33,328 Type B outliers Type outliers No. of laboratories w ith E outliers Intermed. s.d. Explanation of outlier types A: Single outlier B: Differing laboratory mean C: excessive laboratory s.d. D: Excluded manually E: score outside tolerance limits : Score >3,5 Z score BUETOH Z score TRIMEBEN Z score CAREN Z score DMCPS Z score Measurement unit 0,058 49,9 2,833 28,0-0,984 25,000-1,236 38,700 1,0 Page 6
7 Ringversuch VOC Z score BUETOH Z score TRIMEBEN Z score CAREN Z score DMCPS Z score 1,266 43,0 1,5 35,7 0,437 38,0 1,599 35,700 0,959 2,692 46,0 2,573 41,000 2,240 37,000 1,236 0,766 29,0-1,037 38,3 0,953 35,100 0,958 32,8 0,3-2,651 23,2-2,245 26,2-1,451 24,8-1,2 33,100 0,403-1,161 29,700-1,018 24,8-1,729 23,2-1,616 24,7-1,380-0,921 55,9 3,974 31,000-0,7,8 0,035 29,5-0,355-3,881 17,8-3,272 35,9 0,477 29,000-0,367 17,0-2,971 0,842 40,000 0,1 39,0 1,182 36,0 1,262 43,000 2,518 0,613 43,800 1,6 35,8 0,457 35,0 1,067 33,0 0,6-1,770 28,800-1, 21,1-2,464 26,0-0,953 29,7-0, ,114 39,740 0,891 35,315 0,3 31,085 0,086 31,980 0,164-1,835,000 1,701 23,0-1,997 19,000-2,539 19,8-2,427 1,3 42,8 1,483 38,800 1,043 36,6 1,295 37,0 1,365-0,986 32,0-0,486 26,7-1,351 25,0-1,105 25,6-1,188-2,967 26,000-1,7 27,000-1,2,000-1,888,0-1,861 1,386 13,000-4,1 41,0 1,579 32,000 0,285 66,0 7,538-1,661 28,000-1,342 27,0-1,202 20,0-2,213,0-1,861 0,570 33,1-0,362 37,1 0,715 42,700 2,9 41,400 2,176 1,272,0 4,756,5 2,2 34,340 0,793 36,845 1,203 0,298 17,000-3,434 34,000 0,089 26,000-1,019 29,000-0,472 0,842 48,0 2,557 32,0-0,209 33,000 0,2 33,0 0,489 0,4 41,9 1,311 38,400 0,9 33,1 0,535 32,200 0,211-0,083 37,700 0,3 31,7-0,358 34,200 0,7 29,5-0,355 0,842 38,0 0,655 36,000 0,486 31,0 0,176 31,0 0,062 Method Assessment Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 Z <=2,000 35,054 33,552,9 31,211 Reproducibility s.d. 9,592 6,759 6,417 6,809 Rel. reproducibility s.d. 27,36 % 20,15 % 20,91 % 21,81 % Reference value 36,000 34,100 31,200 33,800 Target s.d. 5,258 5,033 4,3 4,2 Page 7
8 Ringversuch VOC Z score BUETOH Z score TRIMEBEN Z score CAREN Z score DMCPS Z score Rel. target s.d. 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % 15,00 % Low er limit of tolerance 24,538 23,486 21,482 21,848 Upper limit of tolerance 45,571 43,617 39,896 40,575 Low er confidence limit,912,904 28, 28,517 Upper confidence limit 39,196 36,199 33,5 33,906 Type B outliers Type outliers No. of laboratories w ith E outliers Intermed. s.d. Explanation of outlier types A: Single outlier B: Differing laboratory mean C: excessive laboratory s.d. D: Excluded manually E: score outside tolerance limits : Score >3,5 Page 8
9 15,337 sample 1 3, ,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 12,00 10,00 8,00 1 Page 9
10 3-Carene sample 1 19,693 3, ,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 1 Page 10
11 16,245 sample 1 3,628 55,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 5,00 1 Page 11
12 15,3 sample 1 3, ,00 38,00 36,00 34,00 32,00,00 B 49,810 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 12,00 10,00 8,00 6,00 1 Page 12
13 n-butyl acetate sample 1 17,069 3, B Page 13
14 n-dodecane sample 1 15,655 2, ,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 12,00 10,00 8,00 6,00 1 Page 14
15 n-heptane sample 1 18,780 4, B,00 B 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 1 Page 15
16 p-xylene sample 1 15,725 3,298 23,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 B 35,0 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 12, ,00 8,00 Page 16
17 n-tetradecane sample 1 17,855 4, ,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 5,00 1 Page 17
18 Toluene sample 1 19,623 4,737 19,00 45,00 62,075,1 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 5,00 1 0,00 Page 18
19 Sample chart of Z scores Sample: sample 1 NBUAC NHEPTAN TOLUOL NDODECAN Measurand TETRADEC BUETOH TRIMEBEN CAREN DMCPS 1 2,6 9,737-2,549-2,136-2,851-3,347-2,762-2,851 5,900 2,190-2,233 2,013-4,255-4,526 9,059 2,456-2, 18,864 3, -2,618 3,355 2,166 14,566 3,766 2,9 2,024 8,383-2,004-3,899-2,195 5,424 2,6-2,335-2,354-2,707 3,553 3,975-3,829-3,493-3,838 2,295-2,9-3,621 10,0 2,896 6,974 4,646 4,852-2,146-2,124-2,3 2,2-2,266 15,006 3,113 5,419-2,481 5,520 8,312-2,091-2,7 8,312 2,524 2, Z score quo data Demo version Page 19
20 33,552 sample 2 6, ,00,00 48,00 46,00,00 42,00 40,00 38,00 36,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 1 Page 20
21 3-Carene sample 2,9 6, ,00 40,00 38,00 36,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 1 Page 21
22 31,211 sample 2 6,809 24,00 48,00 46,00 66,0,00 42,00 40,00 38,00 36,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 1 Page
23 35,054 sample 2 9,592 21,00 55,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 1 Page 23
24 n-butyl acetate sample 2 38,721 7, ,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 1 Page 24
25 n-dodecane sample 2 45,6 9,435 25,00 55,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 15,00 10,00 1 Page 25
26 n-heptane sample 2 37,591 8,8 25,00 55,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25,00 20,00 1 Page 26
27 n-tetradecane sample 2,3 6,724 24,00 42,00 40,00 38,00 36,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 12,00 10,00 8,00 1 Page 27
28 p-xylene sample 2 34,031 6, B,00 58,00 56,00 54,00 52,00,00 48,00 46,00,00 42,00 40,00 38,00 36,00 34,00 32,00,00 28,00 26,00 24,00,00 1 Page 28
29 Toluene sample 2 37,073 7, ,00 85,00 80,00 124,0 75,00 70,00 B 65,00,00 55,00,00 45,00 40,00 35,00,00 25, ,000 20,00 Page 29
30 Sample chart of Z scores Sample: sample 2 NBUAC NHEPTAN TOLUOL NDODECAN Measurand TETRADEC BUETOH TRIMEBEN CAREN DMCPS 1 2,114 3,061-2,173-2,464-3,826-3,031-2,197 3,9 15,740 2,247 2,456-2,651 2,692-2,245-3,098-3,881-3,272 2,541-3,2-2,200-2,032-2,967-4,1-2,6 2,864 5,312 5,1-3,434 2,833 3,974-2,464 4,756 2,557 2,573 2,240-2,971 2,518-2,539-2,427-2,213 7,538 2,9 2,176 2, Z score Page
31 Ringversuch VOC Questions and Answers Participant thermodesorber Tenax TA ISO TENAX TA ISO PE Turbomatrix 3 TENAX TA ISO MARKES UNITY 2 Tenax TA - Carbiograph 5 TD ISO Markes UNITY2-/ Tenax TA ja Shimadzu TD 20 Tenax TA Nein Turbomatrix ATD von PerkinElmer Tenax TA ISO TDS2 (Gerstel) Tenax Ja Gerstel TDSA Tenax TA ja Perkin Elmer TurboMatrix 6 Tenax TA gemäß ISO Perkin ElmerTurboMatrix automatischer Thermodesorber 1 Tenax TA Ja Turbo Matrix 6 Tenax TA EN ISO TurboMatrix 3 Gerstel Tenax TA Adsorber ja Gerstel TDS-2 mit Gerstel TDS A und KAS-4 TenaxTA Ja TDS2 a. Gerstel Tenax TA ja Turbo Matrix 6 Tenax TA Perkin Elmer ATD Turbo Matrix 6 Tenax TA ja Gerstel TDS A tenax atd400 perkin elmer Tenax TA -80 mesh ISO STD DANI 33. TENAX TA ISO/DIS T-Dex II(GL Sciences Inc.) Tenax Ja ATD 400 Tenax TA GC-MS-Thermosdesorption Perkin Elmer TurboMatrix 6 Tenax TA Nein Turbomatrix TENAX TA Nein, Interne Methode SOP-B-25 MARKES ULTRA + UNITY Page 31
32 Ringversuch VOC Participant desorption temperature desorption flow desorption time Tube 280 C; Trap 0 C C ml/min 15 min 280degree ml/min 5min C ml/min 10 min 340 C ml/min 20 min 2 C 13,4 ml/min 25 to 2 C in 11,75 min, 5 min hold time at 2 C 2 C ml / min C / Min. von 40 C bis 2 C, 5 Minuten bei 2 C 280 C C 80 cm3/min 15 min C ml/min 12 min 10 C 0,5min 40 C/min 310 C 8min ml/min Helium ECD 10 C 0,5min 40 C/min 310 C 8min 280 C 100 ml/min 5 Min bis 280 C C ml/min 10 min bis 280 C 1,2 ca. 14 min 2 C 15 2ºC 10 ml/min 10 min 2 degrees 90 ml/min 10min C ml/min 5Min 0 C ml/ min 10 min 280 C ml/min 15min. Participant cyro trap carrier gas flow rate -3 C general purpose hydrophobic trap (C4/5 bis C/32) Stickstoff 0,5-0,6 - C Helium 2 ml/min -degree to 290degree helium C C, max He -10 / 315 Helium 1,5-15 C Helium 1,88 ml/min Page 32
33 Ringversuch VOC Participant cyro trap carrier gas flow rate Helium 15 ml/min helium 1 ml/min He 1.5 ml/min Helium 1,5 Helium 1 Helium 1,8 helium 1,0 ml/min Helium Qualität ECD 1ml/min const low -100 C/280 C Helium 1 ml/min - C/bis 280 C Helium 2 - C C Helium 1,5 ml/min -1 C/bis 280 C Helium 1,2 - C / 280 C azote cryo temperature = -35ºC, heating temperature=0ºc helium 0.8 ml/min Cryo trap at -1 degrees and desorb at +310 degrees helium 2.3ml/min - Helium 1,2 - C Helium 1.2ml/min minus C Helium 0,5 ml/ min -10 C Helium 1.5 ml/min Participant analytical column detector HP1-MSUI Agilent 5973 Inert (Massenselektiver Detektor) Rxi-5ms (Restek) mm x 0.32 mm x 25 µm Mas spectrometer (MSD) : flame ionization (ID) DB-5MS m GC-MS Rxi-5sil MS Agilent 5975C inert XL MSD Restek semi-volatile ( * 0.25mm * 0.) MS Phenomenex ZB 5-MS, m, 0,25 mm ID, 0,25 µm D Shimadzu GC-MS QP 2010 Vocol von Supelco MS HP-1MS, m 0,25 mm ID, 0,25 µm film thickness quadrupool MS Agilent 5973N J&W G, DB-5ms MS RTX-200 MSD Rtx-5HS (m x 0,25mm x 0,5 µm) MS Page 33
34 Ringversuch VOC Participant analytical column detector 1 CPSil 8CB m MS Optima 5MS 0,25mm MS Clarus 0 Agilent HP 5 ms min X0,25mm x 0,5µm Agilent MSD 5973 DB-5MS m X 0,25 mm ID1µm DB-5MS ( m x 0,25 µm x 0,25 mm) 5975 C Agilent Rxi - % Sil MS m ; 2µm ; 1,0µm MSD DB-5MS ( m x 0,200 mm x 0,33 µm) GC-MS 5973 Agilent m*0,25mm*1µm DB5 ID + MS HP5 ( m, 0.2 mm, 0. um) MSD 5972 HP-VOC(m, 0.32mm, I.D. 1.8um) MSD DB 5 MS Rtx Volatile m (ID 0,25mm; D 1µm) von Restek Massenspektrometer Varian Saturn 00 Varian V Xms m, 0.25 mm i.d., 0.5 µm ilm MS HP INNOWAX m x 0.32mm x 0.5µm MSD Participant data evaluation substanzspezifisch mit interner Standard Toluol D8 und Targetionen, aber auch TIC - je nach Bedarf/Überlagerung: 1,2,3-TMB substanzähnlich über 1,3,5-TMB, Toluol über Cyclodekan; Identifizierung über Vergleich Retentionszeit Referenzsubstanz (Kalibrierreihe) und Spektrenbibliothek WILEY275 identification by MSD / quantification by ID internal standard method External calibration Proben im TIC, Proben im SIM Ext. Std., 3-Punkt-Kalibration. Identifizierung mittels MS. quantification using 5 point calibration curves of all target compounds (EIC) Kalibrierung mit Standards, Softew are: Agilent Masshunter externer Standard, quadratischer it IS Toluol D8 1 Kalibrierung aller Komponenten per Kalibrierkurven mit internem Standard external standards, library searching substanzspezifisch externe Kalibrierung ident. über externe Standards, quant. über relative Responsefaktoren, interner Standard Toluen D8 Page 34
35 Ringversuch VOC Participant data evaluation ident. über externe Standars, quant. über relative Responsefaktoren, interner Standard Toluene D identification by MSD and confirmed by standard injection for all the compounds; calibration curve w ith 5 levels of concentration 2-Butoxyethanol w as calculated by using toluene(tic) response factor,and others w ere calculated by using their individual response factor. EIC Originalreferenz, eigene und kommerzielle Bibliotheken Identifizierung: Retentionszeit + substanzspezif. Massen/ Quantifizierung: mittels interner Standardmethode über hinterlegte Mehrpunktkalibrieung TIC und SIR - Mode mit internem Standard Quantifizierung mittels spezifischen Massenfragmenten, Indentifizierung mittels Bibliothek NIST05 Participant date of analysis June 2011, 7th and 9th 2011/7/ /07/2011 Proben am.06., Proben am /06/ / June Jun 2011 Page 35
36 Ringversuch VOC Participant date of analysis Page 36
37 TNN 3- Carene n-butyl acetate p-xylene Toluene n-heptane Dodecane blank value correction y/n DMCS <1 <1 <1 5,9 5,6 69,2 <1 5,5 10,5 14,3 n <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 8 n 1,0 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 n <1 <1 <1 1,9 3,6 5,3 7,6 1,3 4,0 6,1 n <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 4,0 <3 <3 <3 <3 n 0,42 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,42 0, 0,0 0,0 0,40 0,86 n 0,0 7,4 0,0 0,0 0,0 1,8 2,9 0,0 0,0 4,8 n 0,3 0,2 0,3 0,2 y 0, 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,10 108,0 0, 0, 1,10 0,90 y n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 8,0 5,4 <5 6,7 6,3 y/n 1 1,8 0,92 1,11 1,55 2,98 4,5 2,9 3,79 3,8 2,1 n 0,3 0,2 0 0, ,2 0,1 0,2 0 n 2,0 2,3 n 1,4 5 19,6 y 1,0 2 2,0 20 6,0 1,0 n n 1,0 5 1,0 32 4,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 n 2 2,2 n 0,0 7,8 0,0 6,1 <1 1,8 0,0 1,7 1,8 5,2 y/n <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 n n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. 0,59 0, 0,46 0,48 0,54 0,19 0,39 0,18 y/n n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. 1,0 0 0,0 1 0,0 1 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 n IA n 3- Carene Blank values RRT VOC 2011 blank value adjustment 1 () blank value adjustment2 () n-butyl acetate p-xylene Toluene n-heptane Dodecane 1,2,3- Trimethylbenzene 2-Butoxyethanol n-tetradecane 1,2,3- Trimethylbenzene 2-Butoxyethanol n-tetradecane TNN DMCS <1 <1 <1 7,1 5,7 75,3 <1 <1 8,7 13,5 n <1 <1 <1 <1 1,1 1,1 <1 <1 <1 <1 n <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 n <1 <1 <1 <1 1,8 2,2 2,4 <1 3,2 3,6 n <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3 n 0,66 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,54 0,53 0,0 0,0 0,25 0,83 n 0,0 1,1 0,0 0,0 3,0 1,1 2,2 0,0 0,0 0,0 n 0,4 0,6 0,3 0,9 1,4 0,2 y 0,7 0,2 0,00 0,0 0,7 1, 0,10 0,2 0,7 0,6 y n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 <5 n 1 1, 1, 0,99 2,39 2,65 4,23 3,06 3,14 3, 1,71 n 0, , ,2 0,1 0,2 0,0 n 4 2,6 n 1,4 5,9 24,4 y 1,0 1,0 20,0 4,0 1,0 n n 1,0 9,0 2,0 86,0 10,0 1,0 1 1,0 n 1,1 4,0 4,8 2,0 n 0,0 8 0,0 5,2 0,0 2,2 0,0 1,7 0 6,6 y/n <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 n n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. 0,41 0,38 0,29 0,26 0,29 0,15 0,25 0,19 y/n n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. n.c. 1,0 2 0,0 1,0 0,0 1,0 3,0 0,0 1 1,0 n IA n Page 37
VOC TEST REPORT M1. 6 April Regulation or protocol Conclusion Version of regulation or protocol
Dana Lim A/S Københavnsvej 220 4600 Køge DENMARK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT M1 6 April 2017 1 Sample
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT ISO 16000
Proxy A/S Gothersgade 12, 1.th 1123 København K DENMARK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC
More informationVOC TEST REPORT M1. 16 August Regulation or protocol Conclusion Version of regulation or protocol
SGS-Doors A/S Thrigesvej 8-16 7430 Ikast DENMARK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT M1 16 August 2016 1 Sample
More informationTest Report. Tremco-Illbruck GmbH & Co KG. Product Emissions Test (AgBB/DIBt Test Protocol) Butyl und Bitumenprimer. June 2011
Test Report Tremco-Illbruck GmbH & Co KG Product Emissions Test (AgBB/DIBt Test Protocol) Butyl und Bitumenprimer June 2011 Client: Tremco-Illbruck GmbH & Co KG Von Der Wettern Str. 27 51149 Köln Germany
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT BREEAM NOR
Hey di AS Tretjerndalsveien 68 Pb 13 2017 Frogner NORWAY Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information
More informationVOC TEST REPORT M1. 23 October Regulation or protocol Conclusion Version of regulation or protocol
Würth Oy Würthintie 1 11710 Riihimäki Finland Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT M1 23 October 2017 1 Sample
More informationTest Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe
L Isolante K-flex Srl Via Leonardi da Vinci 36 20877 Roncello (MB) Italy Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing Date 29 August 2013
More informationVOC TEST REPORT CDPH
Adolf Würth GmbH und Co. KG Reinhold-Würth Str. 12-17 74653 Künzelsau GERMANY Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT
More informationVOC TEST REPORT CDPH
Baux AB Östermalmsgatan 26A 114 26 Stockholm SWEDEN Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT CDPH 29 September 2017
More informationDetermination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 7667A mini TD and 7820A GC
Determination of Total Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Air Using Agilent 77A mini TD and 70A GC Application Note Environmental Authors Tingting Bu, Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai) Co.,
More informationVOC TEST REPORT CDPH
Euro Trade Flooring SL. Pol. Ind. Can Estella c/galileo no. 11 08635 Sant Esteve Sesrovires BARCELONA SPAIN Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing
More informationTest Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe
Protox Fabriksvej 19 6000 Kolding DENMARK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing Date 13 August 2015 Test Report- VOC emission regulations
More informationValidation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System
Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System Application Note Abstract The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) developed the Method
More informationTest Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe
Protox Aps Fabriksvej 19 6000 Kolding Denmark Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing Date 14 November 2014 Test Report- VOC emission
More informationTest Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe
Scan Underlay ApS Dalgas Avenue 50 8000 Aarhus C Denmark Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voctesting Date 6 January 2015 Test Report VOC
More informationVOC TEST REPORT AgBB
Bostik SA 253 rue du Président Wilson 93211 La Plaine St Denis Cedex FRANCE Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT
More informationEMICODE Test Report. 1 Sample Information. 2 Evaluation of the Results. Report No. G12871B_02
Polyseam A/S Ravneveien 7 Linnestad Næringsområde 3174 Revetal Norway Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing Date 09 October 2014
More informationTest Report- VOC emission regulations in Europe
CONICA AG Industriestr. 26 CH-8207 Schauffhausen Switzerland Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing Date 31 July 2014 Test Report-
More informationThe Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note
The Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note Abstract Area and retention time are the two primary measurements in gas chromatography. The precision with which
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Hunter Douglas Europe BV Piekstraat 2 3071 EL Rotterdam NETHERLANDS Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC
More informationApplying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation
Applying the Technology of the TurboMatrix 650 ATD to the Analysis of Liquid Accelerants in Arson Investigation Introduction Fire investigation involves many different types of analyses from crime scene
More informationVOC TEST REPORT EMICODE
Bostik SA 253 rue du Président Wilson 93211 La Plaine St Denis Cedex FRANCE Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT
More informationApplication Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions. By: Anne Jurek
Automated Handling Techniques for the Analysis of Elevated Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Concentrations in Soils Utilizing the Atomx Concentrator/Multimatrix Autosampler. Application Note By: Anne Jurek
More informationValidation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS
Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Application Note By Tyler Trent Abstract In order to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort
Masureel Int. NV Kantstraat 1 8531 Hulste-Harelbeke BELGIUM Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort
More informationVOC TEST REPORT EMICODE
Polyseam Ltd Shaw Park, Silver Street Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, HD5 9AF UK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT
More informationAnalytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C
Analytical Trap Comparison for USEPA Method 8260C Application Note Abstract Purge and trap concentration is a technique that is used for the analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). The major component
More informationAnalysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70
Analysis of Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol Utilizing the Stratum PTC and Aquatek 70 Application Note Abstract Geosmin and 2-Methylisoborneol are organic compounds that have a distinct scent. These compounds
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Tarkett Indoor Air Quality
Tarkett France 2, av Francois Sommer B.P. 40333 08203 SEDAN Cedex FRANCE Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort
LENTEX S.A. Powstanców Slaskich 54 42-700 Lubliniec POLAND Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing VOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort
More informationTest Report in accordance CDPH-IAQ
Scan Underlay ApS Smedeskovvej 38 Dalgas Avenue 50 8464 Galten 8000 Aarhus C Denmark Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing Test Report in accordance CDPH-IAQ Date 6 January 2015 1 Sample
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Polyseam AS Ravnevejen 7 3174 Revetal NORWAY Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
POLYSEAM LTD St Andrews Road HD1 6SB Huddersfield UNITED KINGDOM Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort
Protox ApS Fabriksvej 19 6000 Kolding DENMARK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC EMISSION
More informationINNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical
INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist,, pp, EST Analytical Air pollution is a growing problem due to the global economy and industrial development in
More informationTHE NEW QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ULTRATRACE SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL GAS
International Gas Union Research Conference 14 THE NEW QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ULTRATRACE SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL GAS Main author Hironori IMANISHI Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. JAPAN himanishi@tokyo-.co.jp
More informationSlightly Polar Columns
9000 Варна, ул.поп Харитон 47 e-mail : gea99@abv.bg www.geya99.com Slightly Polar Columns With the partnership of Teknokroma SLIGHTLY POLAR COLUMNS TRB-5 It is the most universal and versatile stationary
More informationCopyright 2009 PerkinElmer LAS and CARO Analytical Services, Inc.
Optimizing Sampling and Analytical Parameters for Soil Vapour Samples using Automated Thermal Desorption / Gas Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry (ATD/GC/MS) Stephen Varisco, Technical Manager, CARO Analytical
More informationPractical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software
Practical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software High Efficiency GC Columns Page 1 Variables for Shortening Run Times Stationary Phase Shorten Column Length
More informationAnalysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System
Application Note Residual Solvent Analysis of USP Method Residual Solvents on the Agilent 889 GC System Author Lukas Wieder, Jie Pan, and Rebecca Veeneman Agilent Technologies, Inc. 8 Centerville Road
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Wasziederij De Vesting BV Trasweg 12 5712 BB Someren NETHERLANDS Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information
More informationAnalysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap is considered a mature technique, advances in
More informationMethod for the determination of dimethyl sulfate
German Social Accident Insurance Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung Analytical Subcommittee of the Chemistry Board of Experts* Carcinogenic substances Order number: BGI 505-7-05 Established methods:
More informationMethanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C
Methanol Extraction of high level soil samples by USEPA Method 8260C Abstract In order to determine the concentration of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in soil and waste samples the USEPA developed
More informationTrajan SGE GC Columns
Trajan Scientific and Medical Trajan SGE GC Columns Trajan Scientific and Medical Our focus is on developing and commercializing technologies that enable analytical systems to be more selective, sensitive
More informationResidual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter <467> Methodology
APPLICATION NOTE Gas Chromatography Author: David Scott PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter Methodology Introduction The synthesis of active pharmaceutical
More informationMagnitudes of Back Diffusion During Long-Term Diffusive Sampling of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Carbotrap and Chromosorb 106
Turk J Chem 24 (2000), 131 139. c TÜBİTAK Magnitudes of Back Diffusion During Long-Term Diffusive Sampling of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Carbotrap and Chromosorb 106 Naciye KILIÇ University of Uludağ,
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Baux AB Östermalmsgatan 26A 114 26 Stockholm SWEDEN Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC TEST REPORT Indoor
More informationTar analysis by Solid Phase Adsorption (SPA) associated with Thermal Desorption (TD) and Gas Chromatography (GC) analysis
Tar analysis by Solid Phase Adsorption (SPA) associated with Thermal Desorption (TD) and Gas Chromatography (GC) analysis E. Masson (CRITT Bois, Epinal, France) A. Dufour (CNRS, Nancy, France) International
More informationTest Report. Muovihaka Oy. Product Emissions in accordance with the Swedish Building Material Assessment Ultima graphite.
Test Report Muovihaka Oy Product Emissions in accordance with the Swedish Building Material Assessment July 2012 Client: Muovihaka Oy Kuusimäentie 12 01900 Nurmijärvi Finland Date: 26 July 2012 Testing
More informationTO-17 Extending the Hydrocarbon Range above Naphthalene for Soil Vapor and Air Samples Using Automated
TO-17 Extending the Hydrocarbon Range above Naphthalene for Soil Vapor and Air Samples Using Automated Lee Marotta, Field Application Scientist, PerkinElmer Miles Snow, Research Scientist, PerkinElmer
More informationDetermination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD
Determination of Volatile Aromatic Compounds in Soil by Manual SPME and Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MSD Application Note Environmental Author Suli Zhao, Andy Zhai Agilent Technologies Co., Ltd. 412 Yinglun Road
More informationApplication Note 059 Direct Desorption of Car Trim Materials for VOC and SVOC Analysis in Accordance with VDA Method 278
Application Note Direct Desorption of Car Trim Materials for VOC and SVOC Analysis in Accordance with VDA Method Application Note Abstract In this application note, we demonstrate the suitability of Markes
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Knauf Insulation sprl Rue de Maestricht 95 4600 VISÉ BELGIUM Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC TEST
More informationCharacterising Volatile Organic Compounds from Sewer Emissions by Thermal Desorption coupled with Gas- Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 30, 2012 Guest Editor: Renato Del Rosso Copyright 2012, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l., ISBN 978-88-95608-21-1; ISSN 1974-9791 The Italian Association of Chemical
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
IEdiSa - GRAPHENSTONE Calle Carpinteros, 25 41520 EL VISO DEL ALCOR (Sevilla) SPAIN Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing
More informationSTANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES
PAGE: 1 of 14 CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING AND STORAGE 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS 5.0 EQUIPMENT/APPARATUS 6.0 REAGENTS
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
AM Technology 1 Fore Street London EC2Y 5EJ UNITED KINGDOM Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC TEST REPORT
More informationDetermination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air
JSB is an authorised partner of Determination of Volatile Organic s in Air Anne Jurek #126 Introduction Air pollution is a growing problem due to the global economy and industrial development in many countries.
More informationEnhanced odour profiling of strawberries using TD GC TOF MS
Application Released: April 213 Application Note 515 Enhanced odour profiling of strawberries using TD GC TOF MS Summary This Application Note describes the application of a BenchTOF time-of-flight mass
More informationUnderstanding Gas Chromatography
Understanding Gas Chromatography What is Really Going on Inside the Box? Simon Jones GC Applications Engineer Page 1 Group/Presentation Title Month ##, 200X ?? K? Page 2 Typical GC System Gas supply Injector
More informationTest Report in accordance CDPH-IAQ
Hilti Entwicklungsgesellschaft GmbH Hiltistraße 6 86916 Kaufering Germany Test Report in accordance CDPH-IAQ Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Polyseam AS Ravnevejen 7 3174 Revetal NORWAY Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark VOC@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information VOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air
More informationTHEORETICAL DETERMINATION OF THE SAMPLING RATES OF DIFFUSION SAMPLERS FOR VOCS AND ALDEHYDES
THEORETICAL DETERMINATION OF THE SAMPLING RATES OF DIFFUSION SAMPLERS FOR VOCS AND ALDEHYDES J Kouzaki 1*, S Sato 1, S Nakai 1, Y Shirasuna 2, K Hirano 2 1 Graduate School of Environmental and Information
More informationOptimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS
Application Note Optimization of Method Parameters for the Evaluation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Purge and Trap with GC/MS Objective By: Glynda Smith In this paper, an evaluation of different methods
More informationSelective Formation of Benzo[c]cinnoline by Photocatalytic Reduction of 2,2 Dinitrobiphenyl with TiO 2 and UV light irradiation
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Chemical Communications. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2015 Content: Selective Formation of Benzo[c]cinnoline by Photocatalytic Reduction of
More informationValidation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler
Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC and the New AQUATek 100 Autosampler Application Note Abstract Automation is the key to increasing laboratory productivity and minimizing costs. It is
More informationEMICODE Test Report. 1 Sample Information. 2 Evaluation of the Results. Report No A_04
Sika Technology AG Tüffenwies 16 8048 Zürich SWITZERLAND EMICODE Test Report 1 Sample Information Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark voc@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing
More informationDetection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS
Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS Application Note Environmental Author Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai)
More informationGC/MS: A Valid Tool for Soil Gas Hydrocarbons Speciation
International Journal of Analytical Mass Spectrometry and Chromatography, 2015, 3, 54-62 Published Online September 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ijamsc http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ijamsc.2015.33007
More informationNCFS Sample Preparation and Instrumental Parameters
NCFS Sample Preparation and Instrumental Parameters April 1, 2010 Prepared by Dana-Marie Dennis and Jessica Frisch Addenda by Dana-Marie Dennis and Quashanna Price 1. MICROMETRY A stage micrometer is used
More informationAnalysis of Pressure Sensitive Adhesives by GC/MS and GC/AED with Temperature Programmable Pyrolyzer
2000 The Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry 627 Analysis of Pressure Sensitive Adhesives by GC/MS and GC/AED with Temperature Programmable Pyrolyzer Sadao NAKAMURA,* Masahiko TAKINO,* and Shigeki DAISHIMA**
More informationFast and Accurate Analysis of PBDEs in a Single Run, Including
Fast and Accurate Analysis of PBDEs in a Single Run, Including Kory Kelly, Adam Endeman, and Matthew Trass Phenomenex, Inc., 411 Madrid Ave., Torrance, CA 90501 USA PO14700713_2 PO14400613_W_2 Abstract
More informationScreening of Pesticide Residues in Water by Sequential Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction-Thermal Desorption with GC/MS
Screening of Pesticide Residues in Water by Sequential Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction-Thermal Desorption with GC/MS Application Note Food Authors Nobuo Ochiai and Kikuo Sasamoto GERSTEL K.K. 2-13-18 Nakane
More informationDetermination of VOC in Artificial Runway by Multiple Headspace Extraction-GC/MS. Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry APPLICATION.
APPLICATION NOTE Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry Author: Kira. Yang PerkinElmer, Inc. Shanghai, China Determination of VOC in Artificial Runway by Multiple Headspace Extraction-GC/MS Introduction
More informationVOC TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Jotun Coating (Zhang Jia Gang) Co., Ltd No. 15 Changjiang Road Jiangsu Yangtze River International Chemical Industry Park 215634 Jingang Town CHINA Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten
More informationValidation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions
Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA Method 8260C Application Note Abstract In order to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water and soil matrices the USEPA
More informationU.S. EPA Method 8270 for multicomponent analyte determination
ENVIRONMENTAL application note U.S. EPA Method 8270 for multicomponent analyte determination Elaine A. LeMoine and Herman Hoberecht Introduction Multicomponent analytes are compounds that yield several
More informationAppNote 6/2004. Thermal Desorption GC Analysis of High Boiling, High Molecular Weight Hydrocarbons SUMMARY
AppNote 6/2004 Thermal Desorption GC Analysis of High Boiling, High Molecular Weight Hydrocarbons Edward A. Pfannkoch, Jacqueline A. Whitecavage, and Jeffrey Christenson Gerstel, Inc., 701 Digital Drive,
More informationVOC EMISSION TEST REPORT Indoor Air Comfort GOLD
Scan Underlay Production ApS Ursusvej 16 8464 Galten DENMARK Eurofins Product Testing A/S Smedeskovvej 38 8464 Galten Denmark CustomerSupport@eurofins.com www.eurofins.com/voc-testing 1 Sample Information
More informationMaximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis
Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis LINDSEY PYRON ANNE JUREK INTRODUCTION There are several demands and requirements imposed on chemists performing volatile organic analysis (VOC) in
More informationAUTOMATED HEADSPACE. Headspace Principles. Graham Broadway. Headspace Gas Chromatography Background to the HS Technique
AUTOMATED HEADSPACE Headspace Principles Graham Broadway Headspace Gas Chromatography Background to the HS Technique Headspace is a technique suitable for the analysis of volatile or relatively volatile
More informationOptimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to
Optimizing Standard Preparation ANNE JUREK Abstract: Standardd preparation can often be a time consuming, tedious process. The opportunity for human error or inconsistencies between individual preparation
More informationExploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time
Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1 Introduction Purge and Trap (P&T) concentrators
More informationAnalysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP<467>) with Shimadzu GC-2010 Plus and HS-10 Headspace Sampler
No. SSI-GC- Gas Chromatography No. GC- Analysis of Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals (USP) with Shimadzu GC- Plus and HS- Headspace Sampler Introduction Organic solvents are routinely used in manufacturing
More informationDiscovering the Scent of Celery: HS-SPME, GC-TOFMS, and Retention Indices for the Characterization of Volatiles
Discovering the Scent of Celery: HS-SPME, GC-TOFMS, and Retention Indices for the Characterization of Volatiles LECO Corporation; Saint Joseph, Michigan USA Key Words: GC-TOFMS, GC-MS, Pegasus BT, HS-SPME,
More informationSURVEY OF CHEMICALS EMISSION FACTORS FROM BUILDING MATERIALS FOR INTERIORS
SURVEY OF CHEMICALS EMISSION FACTORS FROM BUILDING MATERIALS FOR INTERIORS Hitomi Yoshida Japan Testing Center for Construction Materials, Japan Abstract Indoor air pollution in buildings is caused by
More informationPittcon P
PO-CON1701E 76% Increase in Throughput for Determination of Semi-Volatiles Using Narrow-Bore GC Columns and Rapid Data Acquisition with a Highly Sensitive Quadrupole GCMS System Pittcon 2017 1440-14P Brahm
More informationThermal Desorption Technical Support
Thermal Desorption Technical Support Note 47: The Analysis of Landfill Gas Compounds using Thermal Desorption GC/MS and a Retention Time Locked Database Key Words: VOCs, directive, compliance, identifi
More informationGC Resolution Do You See What I See?
GC Resolution Do You See What I See? Column Dimensions and Carrier Gas Optimization Deans Switch Page 1 Variables for Maximizing Resolution Optimized Stationary Phase Longer Column Length Decrease Internal
More informationApplication Note 116 Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ
Application Note Monitoring VOCs in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes with Analysis by TD-GC/MS in Accordance with Chinese EPA Method HJ -3 Application Note Abstract This application note demonstrates the
More informationAuthor. Abstract. Introduction
Improved Performance for the Analysis of Aromatics in Gasoline by ASTM Method D5769 Using the Agilent 5973 inert Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry System Application Author James D. McCurry Agilent
More informationAnalysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis Anne Jurek Introduction: Over the past decade, the need for environmental laboratoriess using purge and trap systems to report at or below the Method Detection
More informationApplication Note. Application Note 081 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-15. Abstract.
Application Note 8 Innovative Cryogen-Free Ambient Air Monitoring in Compliance with US EPA Method TO-5 Application Note Environmental, Canister, TO-5, Air Monitoring, Air Toxics Abstract This application
More informationThermal Desorption Technical Support
Thermal Desorption Technical Support Note 86a: US EPA Method TO-17 for Monitoring Air Toxics in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes and Automated, Cryogen-free Thermal Desorption Application Note Environmental,
More informationAnalysis of Extractable and Leachable (E&L) Compounds Using a Low-Energy EI-Capable High Resolution Accurate Mass GC/Q-TOF
Analysis of Extractable and Leachable (E&L) Compounds Using a Low-Energy EI-Capable High Resolution Accurate Mass GC/Q-TF Application Brief Authors Kevin Rowland 1, Mark Jordi 1, Kai Chen, and Jennifer
More informationElectronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical Model of Analyte Uptake by Permeation Passive Samplers
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Electronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical
More informationAnalysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME
Analysis of BTEX in Natural Water with SPME Application Note Environmental Author Giordano Vassalli Sezione Protezione Aria Introduction Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) isomers are monocyclic
More informationA Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer
A Comparative Analysis of Fuel Oxygenates in Soil by Dynamic and Static Headspace Utilizing the HT3 TM Automatic Headspace Analyzer Application Note By: Anne Jurek Abstract This application note presents
More informationGAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (GC)
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY (GC) Pre-Lab Questions Questions are to be answered before the beginning of the laboratory. The answers are due at the beginning of each experiment (the questions are for credit and
More information