The Little Bang Standard Model
|
|
- Dwayne Banks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 he Little Bang Standard Model Ulrich Heinz (he Ohio State University) Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe University of okyo, 3 December 23 Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy
2 he Big Bang U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 (56)
3 he Little Bang U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 2(56)
4 Big Bang vs. Little Bang Similarities: Hubble-like expansion, expansion-driven dynamical freeze-out chemical freeze-out (nucleo-/hadrosynthesis) before thermal freeze-out (CMB, hadron p -spectra) initial-state quantum fluctuations imprinted on final state Differences: Expansion rates differ by 8 orders of magnitude Expansion in 3d, not 4d; driven by pressure gradients, not gravity ime scales measured in fm/c rather than billions of years Distances measured in fm rather than light years Heavy-Ion Standard Model still under construction = this talk U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 3(56)
5 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 4(56)
6 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 5(56)
7 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 6(56)
8 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions 5 Animation: P. Sorensen -5 Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 7(56)
9 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen 5-5 Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 8(56)
10 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen 5-5 Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 9(56)
11 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen 5 Produced fireball is ~ -4 meters across and -5 lives for ~5x -23 seconds 7 Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei -5 5 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 (56)
12 Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Animation: P. Sorensen 5 Produced fireball is ~ -4 meters across and -5 lives for ~5x -23 seconds 8 Collision of two Lorentz contracted gold nuclei -5 5 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 (56)
13 he Big Bang vs the Little Bangs he Universe HIC kinetic freeze-out distributions and correlations of produced particles lumpy initial energy density hadronization QGP phase quark and gluon degrees of freedom Credit: NASA WMAP HIC P. Sorensen NSAC Subcommittee 22 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 2(56) 8
14 Big vs. Little Bang: he fluctuation power spectrum Mishra, Mohapatra, Saumia, Srivastava, PRC77 (28) 6492 and C8 (2) 3493 Mocsy & Sorensen, NPA855 (2) 24, PLB75 (2) Big Bang temperature power spectrum (Planck 23) Angular scale Flow power spectrum for ultracentral PbPb Little Bangs (Data: CMS, Quark Matter 22; heory: OSU 23) CMS data MCGlb. η/s =.8 MCGlb. η/s =.2 Dl[µK 2 ] v n { 2 } LHC.3 <p <3 GeV (a) Multipole moment, l n Higher flow harmonics get suppressed by shear viscosity A detailed study of fluctuations is a powerful discriminator between models! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 3(56)
15 Each Little Bang evolves differently! Density evolution of a single b = 8 fm Au+Au collision at RHIC, with IP-Glasma initial conditions, Glasma evolution to τ =.2 fm/c followed by (3+)-d viscous hydrodynamic evolution with MUSIC using η/s =.2 =.5/(4π) Schenke, ribedy, Venugopalan, PRL 8 (22) 2523: x [fm] U. Heinz y [fm] x [fm] y [fm] τ=5.2 fm/c ε [GeV/fm ] τ=.2 fm/c ε [GeV/fm ] τ=. fm/c ε [GeV/fm ] 2-3 x [fm] IPMU, 2/3/ y [fm] 4(56)
16 Event-by-event shape and flow fluctuations rule! (Alver and Roland, PRC8 (2) 5495) Each event has a different initial shape and density distribution, characterized by different set of harmonic eccentricity coefficients ε n Each event develops its individual hydrodynamic flow, characterized by a set of harmonic flow coefficients v n and flow angles ψ n At small impact parameters fluctuations ( hot spots ) dominate over geometric overlap effects (Alver & Roland, PRC8 (2) 5495; Qin, Petersen, Bass, Müller, PRC82 (2) 6493) U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 5(56)
17 Definition of flow coefficients: How anisotropic flow is measured: dn (i) dyp dp dφ p (b) = dn(i) dyp dp (b) ( +2 n= Define event average {...}, ensemble average... ( v n (i) (y,p ;b)cos n(φ p Ψ (i) n )) ). Flow coefficients v n typically extracted from azimuthal correlations (k-particle cumulants). E.g. k = 2,4: c n {2} = {e ni(φ φ 2 ) } = {e ni(φ ψ n ) }{e ni(φ 2 ψ n ) }+δ 2 = v 2 n+δ 2 c n {4} = {e ni(φ +φ 2 φ 3 φ 4 ) } 2 {e ni(φ φ 2 ) } = v 4 n+δ 4 v n iscorrelatedwiththeeventplanewhileδ n isnot( non-flow ).δ 2 /M,δ 4 /M 3. 4 th -order cumulant is free of 2-particle non-flow correlations. hese measures are affected by event-by-event flow fluctuations: v 2 2 = v 2 2 +σ 2, v 4 2 = v σ 2 v 2 2 v n {k} denotes the value of v n extracted from the k th -order cumulant: v 2 {2} = v 2 2, v 2{4} = 4 2 v v 4 2 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 6(56)
18 Panta rhei: soft ridge = Mach cone =flow! ALAS (J. Jia), Quark Matter 2 ALICE (J. Grosse-Oetringhaus), QM anisotropic flow coefficients v n and flow angles ψ n correlated over large rapidity range! M. Luzum, PLB 696 (2) 499: All long-range rapidity correlations seen at RHIC are consistent with being entirely generated by hydrodynamic flow. in the % most central collisions v 3 >v 2 = prominent Mach cone -like structure! = event-by-event eccentricity fluctuations dominate! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 7(56)
19 Event-by-event shape and flow fluctuations rule! ALICE (A. Bilandzic) Quark Matter 2 in the % most central collisions v 3 >v 2 = prominent Mach cone -like structure! triangular flow angle uncorrelated with reaction plane and elliptic flow angles = due to event-by-event eccentricity fluctuations which dominate the anisotropic flows in the most central collisions U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 8(56)
20 Viscous relativistic hydrodynamics (Israel & Stewart 979) Include shear viscosity η, neglect bulk viscosity (massless partons) and heat conduction (µ B ); solve with modified energy momentum tensor µ µν = µν (x) = ( e(x)+p(x) ) u µ (x)u ν (x) g µν p(x)+π µν. π µν = traceless viscous pressure tensor which relaxes locally to 2η times the shear tensor µ u ν on a microscopic kinetic time scale τ π : Dπ µν = τ π ( π µν 2η µ u ν ) +... where D u µ µ is the time derivative in the local rest frame. Kinetic theory relates η and τ π, but for a strongly coupled QGP neither η nor this relation are known = treat η and τ π as independent phenomenological parameters. For consistency: τ π θ (θ = µ u µ =local expansion rate). U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 9(56)
21 Numerical precision: Gubser-est Gubser (PRD82 (2) 8527) found analytical solution for relativistic Navier-Stokes equation with conformal EOS, boost-invariant longitudinal and non-zero transverse flow, corresponding to a specific transverse temperature profile. Marrochio, Noronha et al. (arxiv:37.63) found semianalytical generalization of this solution for Israel-Stewart theory. his solution provides a stringent test for numerical Irael-Stewart codes (very rapid and non-trivial transverse expansion!) VISH2+ (C. Shen, 23) U x x (fm) π yy (GeV/fm 3 ) x (fm) π xy (GeV/fm 3 ) x (fm) U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 2(56)
22 Initial Condition + = Ω Generate Initial Conditions supermc (C++) Hydrodynamics Flow of time Hydrodynamic simulations VISHNew (FORRAN)? Cascade Particle emission Hadron re-scattering Collect particle information into observables iss (C++) UrQMD (FORRAN) binutilities (Python) U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 2(56)
23 package structure generatejobs.py & submitjobs_xxx.py Generate jobs and run them in parallel Job Job 2 Job N supermc Initial condition generator M initial conditions VISHNew Hydrodynamics simulator freeze-out surface info iss Particle emission sampler no Particle space-time and momentum info Finished all events? binutilities Spectra and flow calculator Particle spacetime and momentum info osc2u prepare UrQMD ICs multiple UrQMD Hadron rescattering simulator... yes EbeCollector Collect data into SQLite database zip results and store to results folder Analyze the SQLite databases file: collected.db iebe available through JE Collaboration web site U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 22(56)
24 Converting initial shape fluctuations into final flow anisotropies the QGP shear viscosity (η/s) QGP U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 23(56)
25 How to use elliptic flow for measuring (η/s) QGP Hydrodynamics converts spatial deformation of initial state = momentum anisotropy of final state, through anisotropic pressure gradients Au+Au RHIC 2~3% Shear viscosity degrades conversion efficiency ε x = y2 x 2 y 2 +x 2 = ε p= xx yy xx + yy of the fluid; the suppression of ε p is monotonically related to η/s p (fm/c) ideal /s =.8 /s =.6 /s =.24 he observable that is most directly related to the total hydrodynamic momentum anisotropy ε p is the total (p -integrated) charged hadron elliptic flow v ch 2 : ε p = xx yy xx + yy i p dp dφp p 2 cos(2φ p) i p dp dφp p 2 dn i dyp dp dφ p dn i dyp dp dφ p v ch 2 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 24(56)
26 How to use elliptic flow for measuring (η/s) QGP (ctd.) If ε p saturates before hadronization (e.g. in PbPb@LHC (?)) v ch 2 not affected by details of hadronic rescattering below c but: v (i) 2 (p dn ), i change during hadronic phase (addl. radial flow!), and these changes depend on details of the hadronic dynamics (chemical composition dyd 2 p etc.) v 2 (p ) of a single particle species not a good starting point for extracting η/s If ε p does not saturate before hadronization (e.g. AuAu@RHIC), dissipative hadronic dynamics affects not only the distribution of ε p over hadronic species and in p, but even the final value of ε p itself (from which we want to get η/s) need hybrid code that couples viscous hydrodynamic evolution of QGP to realistic microscopic dynamics of late-stage hadron gas phase VISHNU ( Viscous Israel-Stewart Hydrodynamics n UrQMD ) (Song, Bass, UH, PRC83 (2) 2492) Note: this paper shows that UrQMD viscous hydro! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 25(56)
27 Extraction of (η/s) QGP from v 2 /ε hydro (η/s)+urqmd (/S) dn ch /dy (fm -2 ) H. Song, S.A. Bass, UH,. Hirano, C. Shen, PRL6 (2) 923 η/s (fm/c) max. η/s τ dn/dy Glauber / KLN v 2 /ε MC-KLN (a) hydro (η/s) + UrQMD v 2 {2} / ε 2 part /2 KLN v 2 / ε part KLN 2 3 (/S) dn ch /dy (fm -2 ) η/s MC-Glauber (b) hydro (η/s) + UrQMD v 2 {2} / ε 2 part /2 Gl v 2 / ε part Gl η/s (/S) dn ch /dy (fm -2 ) < 4π(η/s) QGP < 2.5 All shown theoretical curves correspond to parameter sets that correctly describe centrality dependence of charged hadron production as well as p -spectra of charged hadrons, pions and protons at all centralities v2 ch /ε x vs. (/S)(dN ch /dy) is universal, i.e. depends only on η/s but (in good approximation) not on initial-state model (Glauber vs. KLN, optical vs. MC, RP vs. PP average, etc.) dominant source of uncertainty: ε Gl x vs. εkln x smaller effects: early flow increases v 2 ε by few% larger η/s bulk viscosity affects v ch 2 (p ), but not v ch 2 Zhi Qiu, UH, PRC84 (2) 249 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 26(56)
28 Global description of spectra and v 2 dn/(2 dy p dp ) (GeV -2 ) %~5%* 3 5%~%* 2 %~5%* 5%~2%* 2%~3%/ 3%~4%/ 2 4%~5%/ 3 5%~6%/ 4 6%~7%/ 5 7%~8%/ 6 PHENIX SAR MC-KLN MC-Glauber p (GeV) VISHNU (H. Song, S.A. Bass, UH,. Hirano, C. Shen, PRC83 (2) 549) + (a) dn/(2 dy p dp ) (GeV -2 ) %~%* 2 %~2%* 2%~4% 4%~6%/ 6%~8%/ 2 /s =. (ideal hydro) /s =.8 /s =.6 /s =.24 (b) p (GeV) p v 2 / MC-Glauber initialization MC-KLN initialization 2 A GeV Au+Au charged hadrons s =.8 s = p (GeV) s =.6 s = p (GeV) VISHNU PHENIX v 2 {EP} (-5%)+.2 (5-%)+. (-2%)+.8 (2-3%)+.6 (3-4%)+.4 (4-5%)+.2 (5-6%) (η/s) QGP =.8 for MC-Glauber and (η/s) QGP =.6 for MC-KLN work well for charged hadron, pion and proton spectra and v 2 (p ) at all collision centralities U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 27(56)
29 Successful prediction of v 2 (p ) for identified hadrons in PbPb@LHC Data: ALICE, Quark Matter 2 Prediction: Shen et al., PRC84 (2) 4493 (VISH2+) Perfect fit in semi-peripheral collisions! he problem with insufficient proton radial flow exists only in more central collisions Adding the hadronic cascade (VISHNU) helps: U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 28(56)
30 v 2 (p ) in PbPb@LHC: ALICE vs. VISHNU v2 Data: ALICE, preliminary (Snellings, Krzewicki, Quark Matter 2) Dashed lines: Shen et al., PRC84 (2) 4493 (VISH2+, MC-KLN, (η/s) QGP =.2) Solid lines: Song, Shen, UH 2 (VISHNU, MC-KLN, (η/s) QGP =.6).3.2. π + K + p ALICE Preliminary VISHNU (η/s) QGP =.6 VISH2+ η/s =.2 5 % 2% 2 3%.2 v2. 3 4% 4 5% 5 6% p (GeV) p (GeV) p (GeV) VISHNU yields correct magnitude and centrality dependence of v 2 (p ) for pions, kaons and protons! Same (η/s) QGP =.6 (for MC-KLN) at RHIC and LHC! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 29(56)
31 Successful prediction of v 2 (p ) for identified hadrons in PbPb@LHC (II) Data: ALICE, Quark Matter 22 Prediction: Shen et al., PRC84 (2) 4493 (VISH2+) Radial flow pushes v 2 for heavier hadrons to larger p heory curves are true predictions, without any parameter adjustment U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 3(56)
32 Back to the elephant in the room : How to eliminate the large model uncertainty in the initial eccentricity? U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 3(56)
33 wo observations: I. Shear viscosity suppresses higher flow harmonics more strongly Alver et al., PRC82 (2) 3493 (averaged initial conditions) Schenke et al., arxiv: (event-by-event hydro) v n /ε n v 2 /ε 2 v 3 /ε 3 v 4 /ε 4 v 5 /ε 5 v n (viscous)/v n (ideal) v n (η/s=.8)/v n (ideal) v n (η/s=.6)/v n (ideal) 2-3%.8.6 η/s n = Idea: Use simultaneous analysis of elliptic and triangular flow to constrain initial state models (see also Bhalerao, Luzum Ollitrault, PRC 84 (2) 349) U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 32(56)
34 wo observations: II. ε 3 is model independent Zhi Qiu, UH, PRC84 (2) ε 3 (e) (MC-KLN) ε 3 (s) (MC-KLN) ε 3 (e) (MC-Glb) ε 3 (s) (MC-Glb) (b) Initial eccentricities ε n and angles ψ n : ε n e inψn rdrdφr 2 e inφ e(r,φ) = rdrdφr 2 e(r,φ) ε MC-KLN has larger ε 2 and ε 4, but similar ε 5 and almost identical ε 3 as MC-Glauber ε 4 (e) (MC-KLN) ε 4 (s) (MC-KLN) ε 4 (e) (MC-Glb) ε 4 (s) (MC-Glb) (c) b (fm) ε 5 (e) (MC-KLN) ε 5 (s) (MC-KLN) ε 5 (e) (MC-Glb) ε 5 (s) (MC-Glb) (d) Angles of ε 2 and ε 4 are correlated with reaction plane by geometry, whereas those of ε 3 and ε 5 are random (purely fluctuation-driven) ε ε b (fm) 5 5 b (fm) While v 4 and v 5 have mode-coupling contributions from ε 2, v 3 is almost pure response to ε 3 and v 3 /ε 3 const. over a wide range of centralities = Idea: Use total charged hadron v ch 3 to determine (η/s) QGP, then check v ch 2 to distinguish between MC-KLN and MC-Glauber! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 33(56)
35 v2/ε2 v3/ε Combined v 2 & v 3 analysis: η/s is small! Zhi Qiu, C. Shen, UH, PLB77 (22) 5 and QM22 (e-by-e VISH2+) ALICE v 2 {2}/ε 2 {2} ALICE v 2 {4}/ε 2 {4} MC-KLN v 2 {2}/ε 2 {2} MC-KLN v 2 {4}/ε 2 {4} (a) ALICE v 3 {2}/ε 3 {2} MC-KLN v 3 {2}/ε 3 {2}. MC-KLN η/s =.2 (b) Centrality (%) v2/ε2 v3/ε ALICE v 2 {2}/ε 2 {2} ALICE v 2 {4}/ε 2 {4} MC-Glb. v 2 {2}/ε 2 {2} MC-Glb. v 2 {4}/ε 2 {4} (c) ALICE v 3 {2}/ε 3 {2} v 3 / ε 3. MC-Glb. η/s =.8 (d) Centrality (%) Both MC-KLN with η/s=.2 and MC-Glauber with η/s=.8 give very good description of v 2 /ε 2 at all centralities. Only η/s=.8 (with MC-Glauber initial conditions) describes v 3 /ε 3! PHENIX, comparing to calculations by Alver et al. (PRC82 (2) 3493), come to similar conclusions at RHIC energies (Adare et al., arxiv:5.3928, and Lacey et al., arxiv:8.457) Large v 3 measured at RHIC and LHC requires small (η/s) QGP /(4π) unless the fluctuations in these models are completely wrong and ε 3 is really 5% larger than these models predict! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 34(56)
36 Sub-nucleonic fluctuations U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 35(56)
37 Adding sub-nucleonic quantum fluctuations Schenke, ribedy, Venugopalan, PRL8, 2523 (22) MC-Glauber U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 36(56)
38 Adding sub-nucleonic quantum fluctuations Schenke, ribedy, Venugopalan, PRL8, 2523 (22) MC-KLN U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 37(56)
39 Adding sub-nucleonic quantum fluctuations Schenke, ribedy, Venugopalan, PRL8, 2523 (22) IP-Glasma U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 38(56)
40 owards a Standard Model of the Little Bang B. Schenke: QM22 With inclusion of sub-nucleonic quantum fluctuations and pre-equilbrium dynamics of gluon fields: outstanding agreement between data and model Rapid convergence on a standard model of the Little Bang! Schenke, ribedy, Venugopalan, Phys.Rev.Lett. 8:2523 (22) Perfect liquidity reveals in the final state initial-state gluon field correlations of size /Q s (sub-hadronic)! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 39(56) 3
41 What We Don!t Know B. Schenke: QM22 Model doesn t distinguish between a constant η/s of.2 or a temperature dependent η/s with a minimum of /4π Need both RHIC and LHC to sort this out! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 4(56) 4
42 Other successes of the Little Bang Standard Model v n 2 /2 v n 2 / v v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 v v 2 v 3 v 4 v 5 Gale, Jeon, Schenke, ribedy, Venugopalan, arxiv: (PRL 22) RHIC 2GeV, 3-4% filled: SAR prelim. open: PHENIX RHIC 2GeV, 3-4% filled: SAR prelim. open: PHENIX η/s =.2 η/s() p [GeV] P(v 2 / v 2 ), P(ε 2 / ε 2 ) P(v 3 / v 3 ), P(ε 3 / ε 3 ) P(v 4 / v 4 ), P(ε 4 / ε 4 ) 2-25% ε 2 IP-Glasma v 2 IP-Glasma+MUSIC v 2 ALAS. p >.5 GeV η < v 2 / v 2, ε 2 / ε % ε 3 IP-Glasma v 3 IP-Glasma+MUSIC v 3 ALAS. p >.5 GeV η < v 3 / v 3, ε 3 / ε % ε 4 IP-Glasma v 4 IP-Glasma+MUSIC v 4 ALAS. p >.5 GeV η < v 4 / v 4, ε 4 / ε 4 Model describes RHIC data with lower effective specific shear viscosity η/s =.2 In contrast to MC-Glauber and MC-KLN, IP-Sat initial conditions correctly reproduce the final flow fluctuation spectrum, generated from initial shape fluctuations by viscous hydrodynamics U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 4(56)
43 he Little Bang fluctuation power spectrum: initial vs. final.6.5 Little Bang density power spectra -.2% -5% 2-3% 5-6% Solid: IP Glasma Dash dotted: MC Glauber Dashed: MC KLN Flow power spectrum for ultracentral PbPb Little Bangs (Data: CMS, Quark Matter 22; heory: OSU 23).3.25 CMS poster QM22 (Wei Li) MCGlb. η/s =.8 MCKLN η/s =.2 εn v n %@lhc.3 <p <3 GeV n n Higher flow harmonics get suppressed by shear viscosity Neither MC-Glb nor MC-KLN gives the correct initial power spectrum! R.I.P. A detailed study of fluctuations is a powerful discriminator between models! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 42(56)
44 Single event anisotropic flow coefficients In a single event, the specific initial density profile results in a set of complex, y- and p -dependent flow coefficients (we ll suppress the y-dependence): V n = v n e inψn := p dp dφe inφ p dp dφ dn dyp dp dφ dn dyp dp dφ {e inφ }, V n (p ) = v n (p )e inψ n(p ) := dφe inφ dφ dn dyp dp dφ dn dyp dp dφ {e inφ } p. ogether with the azimuthally averaged spectrum, these completely characterize the measurable singleparticle information for that event: dn dydφ = dn 2π dy dn dyp dp dφ = 2π dn ( dyp dp + 2 ( ) v n cos[n(φ Ψ n )], n= + 2 ) v n (p ) cos[n(φ Ψ n (p ))]. n= Both the magnitude v n and the direction Ψ n ( flow angle ) depend on p. v n, Ψ n, v n (p ), Ψ n (p ) all fluctuate from event to event. Ψ n (p ) Ψ n fluctuates from event to event. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 43(56)
45 Higher order event plane correlations in cos(6(ψ 2 Ψ 6 )) Data: ALAS Coll., J. Jia et al., Hard Probes 22 Event-by-event hydrodynamics: Zhi Qiu, UH, PLB 77 (22) 26 (VISH2+) cos(4(ψ 2 Ψ 4 )) cos(8(ψ 2 Ψ 4 )).6 cos(6(ψ 3 Ψ 6 )) cos(2(ψ 2 Ψ 4 )).2 cos(2(ψ 3 Ψ 4 )) cos(6(ψ 2 Ψ 3 )) MC-Glb., η/s =.8 MC-KLN, η/s =.2 N part ALAS data cos((ψ 2 Ψ 5 )) VISH2+ reproduces qualitatively the centrality dependence of all measured event-plane correlations U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 44(56)
46 Higher order event plane correlations in Zhi Qiu, UH, PLB 77 (22) 26 cos(4(φ2 Φ 4 )) cos(8(φ 2 Φ 4 )). cos(2(φ2 Φ 4 ))..5 cos(6(φ 2 Φ 3 )) cos(6(φ 2 Φ 6 )).. cos(6(φ 3 Φ 6 )) cos(2(φ 3 Φ 4 )).8 cos((φ2 Φ 5 )) MC-Glb., η/s =.8 MC-KLN, η/s =.2 N part Initial-state participant plane correlations disagree with final-state flow-plane correlations = Nonlinear mode coupling through hydrodynamic evolution essential to describe the data! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 45(56)
47 Higher order event plane correlations in Data: ALAS Coll., J. Jia et al., Hard Probes 22 Event-by-event hydrodynamics: Zhi Qiu, UH, PLB 77 (22) 26 (VISH2+) cos(2ψ 2 6Ψ 3 + 4Ψ 4 ) cos(2ψ 2 + 3Ψ 3 5Ψ 5 ).2 cos(2ψ 2 + 4Ψ 4 6Ψ 6 ).5. cos( 8Ψ 2 + 3Ψ 3 + 5Ψ 5 ) cos( Ψ 2 + 4Ψ 4 + 6Ψ 6 ) cos( Ψ 2 + 6Ψ 3 + 4Ψ 4 ) MC-Glb., η/s =.8 MC-KLN, η/s =.2 N part ALAS data VISH2+ reproduces qualitatively the centrality dependence of all measured event-plane correlations U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 46(56)
48 Higher order event plane correlations in Zhi Qiu, UH, PLB 77 (22) 26. cos(2φ 2 + 3Φ 3 5Φ 5 )..2 cos(2φ 2 6Φ 3 + 4Φ 4 ) cos( 8Φ 2 + 3Φ 3 + 5Φ 5 ) MC-Glb., η/s = cos(2φ 2 + 4Φ 4 6Φ 6 ) cos( Φ Φ 4 + 6Φ 6 ).4 cos( Φ 2 + 6Φ 3 + 4Φ 4 ) MC-KLN, η/s =.2 N part Initial-state participant plane correlations disagree with final-state flow-plane correlations = Nonlinear mode coupling through hydrodynamic evolution essential to describe the data! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 47(56)
49 est of factorization of two-particle spectra Factorization V n (p,p 2 ) := {cos[n(φ φ 2 )]} p p 2 vn (p ) v n (p 2 ) was checked experimentally as a test of hydrodynamic behavior, and found to hold to good approximation. Gardim et al. (PRC87(23) 39) pointed out that event-by-event fluctuations break this factorization even if 2-particle correlations are exclusively due to flow. hey proposed to study the following ratio: r n (p,p 2 ) := V n (p,p 2 ) Vn (p,p )V n (p 2,p 2 ) = v n(p )v n (p 2 )cos[n(ψ n (p ) Ψ n (p 2 ))]. v n [2](p )v n [2](p 2 ) Even in the absence of flow angle fluctuations, this ratio is < due to v n fluctuations (Schwarz inequality), except for p =p 2. But it additionally depends on flow angle fluctuations. o assess what share of the deviation from is due to flow angle fluctuations, we can compare with r n (p,p 2 ) := v n(p )v n (p 2 )cos[n(ψ n (p ) Ψ n (p 2 ))] v n (p )v n (p 2 ) which deviates from only due to flow angle fluctuations. Again, this ratio approaches for p =p 2. Gardim et al. studied r n for ideal hydro; we have studied r n and r n for viscous hydro (UH, Z. Qiu, C. Shen, PRC87 (23) 3493) and found that about half of the factorization breaking effects are due to flow angle fluctuations. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 48(56)
50 Breaking of factorization by e-by-e fluctuations: v 2 ),p assoc r 2 (p ) Data: Wei Li (CMS), Hard Probes 23; heory (prediction!): UH, Z. Qiu, C. Shen, PRC87 (23) 3493,p assoc r 2 (p ),p assoc r 2 (p ),p assoc r 2 (p GeV/c < p CMS Preliminary PbPb - = 5 µb L int <.5 GeV/c s NN = 2.76 ev.-.2% centrality -5% -% p 4-5% - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p p < 2. GeV/c - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p p < 2.5 GeV/c.5 p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p < 3. GeV/c.5 p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p p VISH2+ Hydro Glauber, η/s=.8 MC-KLN, η/s=.2 - p assoc (GeV/c) Sizable effect for v 2 in ultra-central events -.2% 4-5% Hydro from Heinz and Shen PRC 87, 3493 (23) Factorization breaking effects appear to be suppressed by shear viscosity. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 49(56)
51 Breaking of factorization by e-by-e fluctuations: v 3 ),p assoc r 3 (p ) Data: Wei Li (CMS), Hard Probes 23; heory (prediction!): UH, Z. Qiu, C. Shen, PRC87 (23) 3493,p assoc r 3 (p ),p assoc r 3 (p ),p assoc r 3 (p GeV/c < p CMS PbPb - = 5 µb L int <.5 GeV/c s NN = 2.76 ev.-.2% centrality -5% -% p 4-5% - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p p < 2. GeV/c - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p < 2.5 GeV/c p p - p assoc (GeV/c) - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p < 3. GeV/c.5 p - p assoc (GeV/c).5 p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p p VISH2+ Hydro Glauber, η/s=.8 MC-KLN, η/s=.2 - p assoc (GeV/c) Smaller effect for v 3 " more sensitive to η/s? -.2% 4-5% Hydro from Heinz and Shen PRC 87, 3493 (23) Factorization breaking effects appear to be larger for fluctuation dominated flow harmonics. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 5(56)
52 Breaking of factorization by e-by-e fluctuations: v 4 ),p assoc r 4 (p ) Data: Wei Li (CMS), Hard Probes 23; heory (prediction!): UH, Z. Qiu, C. Shen, PRC87 (23) 3493,p assoc r 4 (p ),p assoc r 4 (p ),p assoc r 4 (p GeV/c < p CMS PbPb - = 5 µb L int <.5 GeV/c s NN = 2.76 ev.-.2% centrality -5% -% p 4-5% - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p < 2. GeV/c p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p p < 2.5 GeV/c.5 p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) - p assoc (GeV/c) GeV/c < p < 3. GeV/c.5 p - p assoc (GeV/c) p - p assoc (GeV/c) p p VISH2+ Hydro Glauber, η/s=.8 MC-KLN, η/s=.2 - p assoc (GeV/c) Smaller effect for v 4 " more sensitive to η/s? -.2% 4-5% Hydro from Heinz and Shen PRC 87, 3493 (23) Hydrodynamics qualitatively, and even semi-quantitatively, predicts all observed factorization breaking effects below p 2.5 3GeV. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 5(56)
53 vahydro: Viscous +%,-$.)$/,#*&)$&%23,#s* g"=#4p=(8b.+4.b-%:"#=(\zv%-="4-( f(τ,x,p) = f eq (p,(τ,x))+δf Q=4*+4V"#("-(:4:&-*P:(=V%#&( U-"=4*+4V"#(8B.+4.B-%:"#=(\ZV%-="4-( f(τ,x,p) = f aniso (p,λ(τ,x), ξ(τ,x) )+δ f }{{}}{{} anisotropy D. Bazow, UH, M. Strickland, 3.672!(nA4:%*=#$,&[)*+"#,'%-.o(94+:("-(SA@( ) f LRF aniso = f iso p2 +ξ(x,τ)p 2 z Λ(x,τ) V+4'%*&( 4C'%*&( ξ = p2 2 p 2 L Anisotropic hydrodynamics (ahydro) was developed by Strickland and Martinez, It treats non-equilibrium (viscous) effects arising from a spheroidal deformation of the local momentum distribution exactly (i.e. non-perturbatively), but ignores other viscous corrections. vahydro adds the remaining viscous corrections δ f perturbatively, as usually done in other viscous hydrodynamic frameworks. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 52(56)
54 vahydro*c`b2;$%-* ),"VV"-;(4L&+(*$&(;4+B(.&*%"'=(*$&(X-%'(/I[:4:&-*(%VV+4Z":%J4-(+&=P'*("=( e(2%3456(7(8&"-36(%-.(!)6(3.672f( q+%-;&[c4z&.(*&+:= %+&(-&5 4*("-."#%*&=(% #4-L&#JL&(.&+"L%JL& R4:V'"#%*&.(C"*=("-('%=* *54(&P%J4-= #4++&=V4-.(*4."=="V%JL&(n94+#&=o %-.(%-"=4*+4V"# *+%-=V4+*(#4& #"&-*= In we simplified these equations for massless particles and (+)-d expansion with longitudinal boost-invariance and no transverse expansion. For this case the theory can be tested against an exact solution of the Boltzmann equation (Florkowski, Ryblewski, Strickland, PRC88 (23) 2493). U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 53(56)
55 4)"--B)"*52;$*7$3/2),-$%-* e(2%3456(uh, M. Strickland, 3.672f( PL P Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV PL P PL P PL P Ξ,4ΠΗ 3,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Τ fm c Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ 3,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Τ fm c Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ 3,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Ξ,4ΠΗ,.6GeV Exact Solution vahydro ahydro 3 rd orderhydro Τ fm c a%-&'=(=$45(+%j4(49('4-;"*p."-%' *4(*+%-=L&+=&(V+&==P+& Y E( l(iee(!&g(_(τ E (l(ehf(9:]# S&y(*4(+";$*("=("-#+&%="-;("-"J%' :4:&-*P:[=V%#&(%-"=4*+4VB Y4V(*4(C4b4:("=("-#+&%="-;(η]S 2'%#,('"-&("=(*$&(&Z%#*(=4'PJ4- A&.(.%=$&.('"-&("=(*$&(%8B.+4 %VV+4Z":%J4-2'P&(.4*[.%=$&.('"-&("=(*$& L%8B.+4(%VV+4Z":%J4- ^+&&-(.%=$&.('"-&("=(%(*$"+.[4+.&+ R$%V:%-[\-=,4;['",&(L"=#4P= $B.+4.B-%:"#=(%VV+4Z":%J4- eu(r%"=5%'6(/defdinef( U=(5&(#%-(=&&(9+4:(*$&=&(V'4*= L%8B.+4(.4&=(P"*&(5&''("-.&&.m U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 54(56)
56 C%.)$/*>"%")2;$%* e(2%3456(7h, M. Strickland, 3.672]( Τf Τ n Τf n Τ Exact Solution vahydro ahydro 3 rd orderhydro 2 nd orderhydro E-*+4VB V+4.P#J4-( L%-"=$&= "-(*54( '":"*=M((".&%' $B.+4.B-%:"#s(%-. 9+&&(=*+&%:"-;( For massless particles6( -P:C&+.&-="*B("= V+4V4+J4-%'(*4 &-*+4VB(.&-="*B. 4 4ΠΗ s In the (+)-d case, which maximizes the difference between longitudinal and transverse expansion rates and thus the P /P L pressure anisotropy, vahydro outperforms all other available approaches. We expect it to improve the validity of viscous hydrodynamics for heavyion collisions at early times. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 55(56)
57 Conclusions Quark-Gluon Plasma is by far the hottest and densest form of matter ever observed in the laboratory. Its properties and interactions are controlled by QCD, not QED. It is a liquid with almost perfect fluidity. Its specific shear viscosity at RHIC and LHC energies is (η/s) QGP ( c <<2 c ) = 2 4π ± 5% his is significantly below that of any other known real fluid. Precision comparison of harmonic flow coefficients at RHIC and LHC provides first serious indications for a moderate increase of the specific QGP shear viscosity between 2 c and 3 c. Viscous relativistic hydrodynamics provides a quantitative description of QGP evolution. By coupling viscous fluid dynamics for the QGP stage to microscopic evolution models of the dense early pre-equilibrium and dilute late hadronic freeze-out stages, a complete dynamical description of the strongly interacting matter created in ultra-relativistic heavy-ion collisions has been achieved. his dynamical theory has made successful predictions for the first Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC that were quantitatively precise and non-trivial (in the sense that they disagreed with other predictions that were falsified by the data). he Color Glass Condensate theory (IP-Sat model) appears to give the correct spectrum of initial-state gluon field fluctuations. A large set of flow fluctuation observables, so far only partially explored, (over)constrains this initial fluctuation spectrum. = We are rapidly converging on the Standard Model for the Little Bang U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 56(56)
58 hanks to: Dennis Bazow, Steffen Bass, Scott Moreland, Zhi Qiu, Chun Shen, Huichao Song, Mike Strickland for their collaboration, to Gabriel Denicol, Matt Luzum, Bjoern Schenke, Jean-Yves Ollitrault for many in-depth discussions, and to Paul Sorensen for letting me use some of his beautiful slides Monday, December 2, 3
59 Supplements U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 57(56)
60 Single event anisotropic flow coefficients In a single event, the specific initial density profile results in a set of complex, y- and p -dependent flow coefficients (we ll suppress the y-dependence): V n = v n e inψn := p dp dφe inφ p dp dφ dn dyp dp dφ dn dyp dp dφ {e inφ }, V n (p ) = v n (p )e inψ n(p ) := dφe inφ dφ dn dyp dp dφ dn dyp dp dφ {e inφ } p. ogether with the azimuthally averaged spectrum, these completely characterize the measurable singleparticle information for that event: dn dydφ = dn 2π dy dn dyp dp dφ = 2π dn ( dyp dp + 2 ( ) v n cos[n(φ Ψ n )], n= + 2 ) v n (p ) cos[n(φ Ψ n (p ))]. n= Both the magnitude v n and the direction Ψ n ( flow angle ) depend on p. v n, Ψ n, v n (p ), Ψ n (p ) all fluctuate from event to event. Ψ n (p ) Ψ n fluctuates from event to event. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 58(56)
61 p -dependent flow angles and their fluctuations n(ψn(p) Ψn) π π/2 π/2 π (a) n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 n=6 Glb, 2-3% p (GeV) Except for directed flow (n=), Ψ n (p ) Ψ n fluctuates most strongly at low p Directed flow angle Ψ (p ) flips by 8 at p GeV for charged hadrons (pions) and at p.5gev for protons (momentum conservation) σ(cos(n(ψn(p) Ψn))) σ(cos(n(ψn(p) Ψn))).8 (b) Glb, 2-3% π n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 n= p (GeV).8 (c) Glb, 2-3% p (GeV) p n= n=2 n=3 n=4 n=5 n=6 U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 59(56)
62 Elliptic and triangular flow comparison (I).6.4 KLN, -5% KLN, -5%.2 π + p v 2 [2] v 2 v 2 {EP} v 2 {2}.. 2. p (GeV) π + p v 3 [2] v 3 v 3 {EP} v 3 {2}.. 2. p (GeV).5 KLN, 6-7% KLN, 6-7%..5 π + p v 2 [2] v 2 v 2 {EP} v 2 {2}.. 2. p (GeV) π + p 4v 3 [2] 4 v 3 4v 3 {EP} 4v 3 {2}.. 2. p (GeV) In central collisions, angular fluctuations suppress v n {EP}(p ) and v n {2}(p ) below the mean and rms flows at low p (clearly visible for protons) his effect disappears in peripheral collisions, but a similar effect then takes over at higher p, for both pions and protons. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 6(56)
63 Elliptic and triangular flow comparison (II): v n ratios.2. KLN, -5% KLN, -5% π, v 2 [2]/ v 2 π, v 2 {2}/v 2 {EP} p, v 2 [2]/ v 2 p, v 2 {2}/v 2 {EP} p (GeV) π, v 3 [2]/ v 3 π, v 3 {2}/v 3 {EP} p, v 3 [2]/ v 3 p, v 3 {2}/v 3 {EP}.. 2. p (GeV) Except for where the numerator or denominator goes through zero, for central collisions these ratios are equal to 2/ π.3, independent of p. Expected if flow angles are randomly oriented (Bessel- Gaussian distribution for v n, see Voloshin et al., PLB 659, 537 (28)). Not true in peripheral collisions, especially not for v 2 (Gardim et al., ) hat this works even for v n {2}/v n {EP} suggests an approximate factorization of angular fluctuation effects! U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 6(56)
64 Elliptic and triangular flow comparison (III): v n ratios (a) Central collisions: (b).8 Glb, -5% Glb, -5%.6.4 (c) π, v 2 {EP}/ v 2 π, v 2 {2}/v 2 [2] p, v 2 {EP}/ v 2 p, v 2 {2}/v 2 [2] (d) π, v 3 {EP}/ v 3 π, v 3 {2}/v 3 [2] p, v 3 {EP}/ v 3 p, v 3 {2}/v 3 [2].8 Glb, -5% Glb, -5%.6 π, v 2 (p )v 2 / v 2 2 (p ) v 2 2 π, cos(2(ψ 2 (p ) Ψ 2 )) p, v 2 (p )v 2 / v 2 2 (p ) v 2 2 p, cos(2(ψ 2 (p ) Ψ 2 )).. 2. p (GeV) π, v 3 (p )v 3 / v 2 3 (p ) v 2 3 π, cos(3(ψ 3 (p ) Ψ 3 )) p, v 3 (p )v 3 / v 2 3 (p ) v 2 3 p, cos(3(ψ 3 (p ) Ψ 3 )).. 2. p (GeV) he angular fluctuation factor cos[n(ψ n (p ) Ψ n )] completely dominates the p -dependence of these ratios! Angular fluctuations have similar effect as poor event-plane resolution: they reduce v n. Angular fluctuations are effective both at low and high p, but not at intermediate p. he window for seeing flow angle fluctuation effects at low p is smaller for pions than for protons. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 62(56)
65 Elliptic and triangular flow comparison (IV): v n ratios Peripheral collisions: (a) (b) (c) Glb, 6-7% π, v 2 {EP}/ v 2 π, v 2 {2}/v 2 [2] p, v 2 {EP}/ v 2 p, v 2 {2}/v 2 [2] (d) Glb, 6-7% π, v 3 {EP}/ v 3 π, v 3 {2}/v 3 [2] p, v 3 {EP}/ v 3 p, v 3 {2}/v 3 [2].8 Glb, 6-7% Glb, 6-7%.6 π, v 2 (p )v 2 / v 2 2 (p ) v 2 2 π, cos(2(ψ 2 (p ) Ψ 2 )) p, v 2 (p )v 2 / v 2 2 (p ) v 2 2 p, cos(2(ψ 2 (p ) Ψ 2 )).. 2. p (GeV) π, v 3 (p )v 3 / v 2 3 (p ) v 2 3 π, cos(3(ψ 3 (p ) Ψ 3 )) p, v 3 (p )v 3 / v 2 3 (p ) v 2 3 p, cos(3(ψ 3 (p ) Ψ 3 )).. 2. p (GeV) he window for seeing flow angle fluctuation effects at low p closes in peripheral collisions. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 63(56)
66 Flow angle fluctuation effects for higher order v n (p ) Central collisions; solid: v n (p ) ; dashed: v n {EP}(p ):.5 v 2 π v 6/3 p π p.6.2 v 3 v 7 2v 4 π π p p 2v 8 π π p p.6.2 p (GeV).6.2 3v 5 π p 3v 9 π p.6.2 As harmonic order n increases, suppression of v n {EP}(p ) (or v n {2}(p )) from flow angle fluctuations for protons gets somewhat weaker but persists to larger p. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 64(56)
67 Conclusions Boththemagnitudesv n andtheflowanglesψ n dependonp andfluctuatefromeventtoevent. In each event, the p -averaged (total-event) flow angles Ψ n are identical for all particle species, but their p distribution differs from species to species. he mean v n values and their p -dependence at RHIC and LHC have already been shown to put useful constraints on the QGP shear viscosity and its temperature dependence (see next talk by B. Schenke) he effects of v n and Ψ n fluctuations can be separated experimentally by studying different V n measures based on two-particle correlations. Flow angle correlations are a powerful test of the hydrodynamic paradigm and will help to further constrain the spectrum of initial-state fluctuations and QGP transport coefficients. Studying event-by-event fluctuations of the anisotropic flows v n and their flow angles Ψ n as functions of p, as well as the correlations between different harmonic flows (both their magnitudes and angles), provides a rich data base for identifying the Standard Model of the Little Bang, by pinning down its initial fluctuation spectrum and its transport coefficients. U. Heinz IPMU, 2/3/23 65(56)
A Standard Model for the Little Bang How far are we from the goal?
A Standard Model for the Little Bang How far are we from the goal? Ulrich Heinz (he Ohio State University) Hydrodynamics of Strongly Coupled Fluids EC*, rento, 2-6 May 24 Supported by the U.S. Department
More informationUncertainties in the underlying e-by-e viscous fluid simulation
Uncertainties in the underlying e-by-e viscous fluid simulation Ulrich Heinz (The Ohio State University) Jet Workfest, Wayne State University, 24-25 August 213 Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy
More informationFlow Harmonic Probability Distribution in Heavy Ion Collision
1/28 Flow Harmonic Probability Distribution in Heavy Ion Collision Seyed Farid Taghavi Institute For Research in Fundamental Sciences (IPM), Tehran, Iran Second Iran & Turkey Joint Conference on LHC Physics
More informationSoft Physics in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
Soft Physics in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Huichao Song 宋慧超 Peking University Hadron and Nuclear Physics in 2017 KEK, Tsukuba, Japan, Jan.7-10, 2017 Jan. 09, 2017 QGP QGP Hadrons nuclei atom 3
More informationReview of collective flow at RHIC and LHC
Review of collective flow at RHIC and LHC Jaap Onderwaater 29 November 2012 J. Onderwaater (EMMI,GSI) Collective flow 29 November 2012 1 / 37 Heavy ion collision stages Outline Heavy ion collisions and
More informationarxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 17 Jun 2015
Shape and flow fluctuations in ultra-central Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC arxiv:154636v3 [nucl-th] 17 Jun 015 Chun Shen, 1,, Zhi Qiu, 1 and Ulrich Heinz 1 1 Department of Physics, he Ohio State University,
More informationHydrodynamical description of ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions
Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies June 27, 2011 with G. Denicol, E. Molnar, P. Huovinen, D. H. Rischke 1 Fluid dynamics (Navier-Stokes equations) Conservation laws momentum conservation Thermal
More informationMIXED HARMONIC FLOW CORRELATIONS
MIXED HARMONIC FLOW CORRELATIONS RECENT RESULTS ON SYMMETRIC CUMULANTS Matthew Luzum F. Gardim, F. Grassi, ML, J. Noronha-Hostler; arxiv:168.2982 Universidade de São Paulo NBI Mini Workshop 19 September,
More informationConstraining the bulk viscosity of QCD
Constraining the bulk viscosity of QCD (with heavy ion collisions) Bwidth Bnorm Jean-François Paquet Tpeak July 21, 2017 Triangle Nuclear Theory Colloquium In collaboration with... Charles Gale Sangyong
More informationConstraining the QCD equation of state in hadron colliders
Constraining the QCD equation of state in hadron colliders Akihiko Monnai (KEK, Japan) with Jean-Yves Ollitrault (IPhT Saclay, France) AM and J.-Y. Ollitrault, Phys. Rev. C 96, 044902 (2017) New Frontiers
More informationHeavy Ions at the LHC: First Results
Heavy Ions at the LHC: First Results Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University Heavy ion collision: Geometry R Au /γ y R Au x b z rapidity : y = 1 2 log ( E + pz E p z ) transverse momentum : p 2
More informationCorrelations & Fluctuations in Large & Small Systems
Correlations & Fluctuations in Large & Small Systems Huichao Song 宋慧超 Peking University mini-symposium on "Computational Physics for High-Energy Heavy-Ion Collisions" YITP Kyoto Japan, Oct 5, 2015 Oct.
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Dec 2011
Higher harmonic anisotropic flow measurements of charged particles at s NN =.76 TeV with the ALICE detector You Zhou (for the ALICE Collaboration) arxiv:111.156v1 [nucl-ex] 6 Dec 011 Nikhef, Science Park
More informationEvent by Event Flow in ATLAS and CMS
Event by Event Flow in ALAS and CMS Gregor Herten Universität Freiburg, Germany LHCP 2015 St. Petersburg, 31.8.-5.9.2015 Some basic heavy-ion physics terminology 2 Centrality and Glauber Model Centrality
More informationELLIPTIC FLOW FROM THERMAL AND KLN INITIAL CONDITIONS
Dr. Marco Ruggieri Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania (Italy) ELLIPTIC FLOW FROM THERMAL AND KLN INITIAL CONDITIONS Based on collaboration with: V. Greco, S.
More informationExploring quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions
Exploring quark-gluon plasma in relativistic heavy-ion collisions Guang-You Qin 秦广友 Duke University @ University of Science and Technology of China July 12 th, 2011 Outline Introduction Collective flow
More informationUNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CATANIA INFN-LNS. inziale nel plasma creato nelle collisioni ad energie ultra-relativistiche
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CATANIA INFN-LNS Anisotropie vn nello spazio degli impulsi e fluttuazioni di stato inziale nel plasma creato nelle collisioni ad energie ultra-relativistiche S. Plumari, L. Oliva,
More informationSpace-time evolution of the Quark Gluon Plasma. Klaus Reygers / Kai Schweda Physikalisches Institut University of Heidelberg
Space-time evolution of the Quark Gluon Plasma Klaus Reygers / Kai Schweda Physikalisches Institut University of Heidelberg High-energy nucleus-nucleus Collisions High-Energy Nuclear Collisions Time à
More informationIn this chapter we will discuss the effect of shear viscosity on evolution of fluid, p T
Chapter 3 Shear viscous evolution In this chapter we will discuss the effect of shear viscosity on evolution of fluid, p T spectra, and elliptic flow (v ) of pions using a +1D relativistic viscous hydrodynamics
More informationLecture 12: Hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions. Elliptic flow Last lecture we learned:
Lecture 12: Hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions. Elliptic flow Last lecture we learned: Particle spectral shapes in thermal model ( static medium) are exponential in m T with common slope for all particles.
More informationMonte Carlo Non-Linear Flow modes studies with AMPT
Monte Carlo Non-Linear Flow modes studies with AMP Daniel Noel Supervised by: Naghmeh Mohammadi 2 July - 31 August 218 1 Introduction Heavy-ion collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) generate such
More informationHints of incomplete thermalization in RHIC data
Hints of incomplete thermalization in RHIC data Nicolas BORGHINI CERN in collaboration with R.S. BHALERAO Mumbai J.-P. BLAIZOT ECT J.-Y. OLLITRAULT Saclay N. BORGHINI p.1/30 RHIC Au Au results: the fashionable
More informationHadronic equation of state and relativistic heavy-ion collisions
Hadronic equation of state and relativistic heavy-ion collisions Pasi Huovinen J. W. Goethe Universität Workshop on Excited Hadronic States and the Deconfinement Transition Feb 23, 2011, Thomas Jefferson
More informationComparing Initial Conditions in a (3+1)d Boltzmann + Hydrodynamics Transport Approach
Comparing Initial Conditions in a (3+1)d Boltzmann + Hydrodynamics Transport Approach Quantifying the Properties of Hot and Dense QCD Matter, Seattle, 04.06.10 Hannah Petersen Thanks to: Jan Steinheimer,
More informationEvent-by-event distribution of azimuthal asymmetries in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions
Event-by-event distribution of azimuthal asymmetries in ultrarelativistic heavy-ion collisions Hannu Holopainen Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies in collaboration with G. S. Denicol, P. Huovinen,
More informationThe Core Corona Model
The Core Corona Model or Is the Centrality Dependence of Observables more than a Core-Corona Effect? inspired by the first multiplicity results in CuCu then used to extract the physics of EPOS simulations
More informationCurrent Status of QGP hydro + hadron cascade approach
Current Status of QGP hydro + hadron cascade approach Tetsufumi Hirano the Univ. of Tokyo/LBNL 6/14/2010 @ INT Introduction Outline Motivation A short history of hybrid approaches Importance of hadronic
More informationHydrodynamic response to initial state fluctuations
University of Jyväskylä, Department of Physics POETIC Jyväskylä 3.9.203 AA-collisions Initial particle/energy production, followed by Hydrodynamic evolution, followed by Freeze-out/Hadron cascade Goal
More informationElliptic flow. p y. Non-central collision of spherical nuclei or central collision of deformed nuclei. Overlapping zone is of almond shape
Outline: Non-central collision of spherical nuclei or central collision of deformed nuclei Overlapping zone is of almond shape Co ordinate space anisotropy is converted into momentum space anisotropy via
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 26 Aug 2011
The Viscosity of Quark-Gluon Plasma at RHIC and the LHC Ulrich Heinz, Chun Shen and Huichao Song Deartment of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 436, USA Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory,
More informationNearly Perfect Fluidity: From Cold Atoms to Hot Quarks. Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University
Nearly Perfect Fluidity: From Cold Atoms to Hot Quarks Thomas Schaefer, North Carolina State University RHIC serves the perfect fluid Experiments at RHIC are consistent with the idea that a thermalized
More informationUltra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collision Results
Ultra-Relativistic Heavy Ion Collision Results I. Overview of Effects Observed in Large Nucleus-Nucleus Collision Systems (Au+Au, Pb+Pb) High p T Hadrons Are Suppressed at LHC & RHIC Central Pb-Pb and
More informationEvent geometrical anisotropy and fluctuation viewed by HBT interferometry
Event geometrical anisotropy and fluctuation viewed by HB interferometry akafumi Niida University of sukuba -- ennoudai, sukuba, Ibaraki 35-857, Japan Abstract Azimuthal angle dependence of the pion source
More informationThe direct photon puzzle
The direct photon puzzle Jean-François Paquet January 16, 2017 ALICE Journal Club Jean-François Paquet (Stony Brook) 2 What is the direct photon puzzle? > Background
More informationarxiv: v3 [nucl-th] 11 Jul 2014
Evolution of transverse flow and effective temperatures in the parton phase from a multi-phase transport model Zi-Wei Lin Department of Physics, East Carolina University, C-209 Howell Science Complex,
More informationCollision Geometry and Flow in Uranium+Uranium Collisions
Collision Geometry and Flow in Uranium+Uranium Collisions Andy Goldschmidt 1, Zhi Qiu 1,2, Chun Shen 1,3, Ulrich Heinz 1 1 Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 2 Google
More informationStudying collective phenomena in pp and A-A collisions with the ALICE experiment at the LHC
Studying collective phenomena in pp and A-A collisions with the ALICE experiment at the LHC Ivan Ravasenga Politecnico di Torino and I.N.F.N. 56 th course, Erice (Sicily, Italy) 14-23.06.2018 Ivan Ravasenga
More informationarxiv: v2 [nucl-ex] 8 Sep 2016
An experimental review on elliptic flow of strange and multi-strange hadrons in relativistic heavy ion collisions Shusu Shi 1 1 Key Laboratory of Quarks and Lepton Physics (MOE) and Institute of Particle
More informationGlobal and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX
Global and Collective Dynamics at PHENIX Takafumi Niida for the PHENIX Collaboration University of Tsukuba Heavy Ion collisions in the LHC era in Quy Nhon outline n Introduction of v n n Higher harmonic
More informationRelativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics for Multi-Component Systems with Multiple Conserved Currents
Reference: AM and T. Hirano, arxiv:1003:3087 Relativistic Viscous Hydrodynamics for Multi-Component Systems with Multiple Conserved Currents Akihiko Monnai Department of Physics, The University of Tokyo
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 28 Nov 2017
Initial state and hydrodynamic modeling of heavy-ion collisions at RHIC BES energies arxiv:1711.1544v1 [nucl-th] 28 Nov 217 Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA E-mail:
More informationTHERMALIZATION, ISOTROPIZATION AND FLOWS OF THE SHATTERED CGC
Dr. Marco Ruggieri Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università degli Studi di Catania, Catania (Italy) THERMALIZATION, ISOTROPIZATION AND FLOWS OF THE SHATTERED CGC Collaborators: - Vincenzo Greco
More informationarxiv: v2 [nucl-th] 24 Sep 2012
Event-by-event viscous hydrodynamics for Cu-Au collisions at s NN = GeV Piotr Bożek The H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, PL-313 Kraków, Poland Institute of Physics, Rzeszów University,
More informationOverview of flow results from ALICE experiment
Overview of flow results from ALICE experiment ShinIchi Esumi for the ALICE collaboration Inst. of Physics, Univ. of Tsukuba contents Multiplicity and transverse momentum distribution Source size measurement
More informationPhenomenology of Heavy-Ion Collisions
Phenomenology of Heavy-Ion Collisions Hendrik van Hees Goethe University Frankfurt and FIAS October 2, 2013 Hendrik van Hees (GU Frankfurt/FIAS) HIC Phenomenology October 2, 2013 1 / 20 Outline 1 Plan
More informationHybrid Model of Heavy-Ion Collisions at BES Energies with Dynamical Sources
Hybrid Model of Heavy-Ion Collisions at BES Energies with Dynamical Sources Lipei Du In collaboration with Gojko Vujanovic and Ulrich Heinz Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, USA May 14,
More informationFinal source eccentricity measured by HBT interferometry with the event shape selection
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Final source eccentricity measured by HB interferometry with the event shape o cite this article: akafumi Niida and PHENIX Collaboration J. Phys.:
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 9 Jun 2008
Dissipative effects from transport and viscous hydrodynamics arxiv:0806.1367v1 [nucl-th] 9 Jun 2008 1. Introduction Denes Molnar 1,2 and Pasi Huovinen 1 1 Purdue University, Physics Department, 525 Northwestern
More informationIntroduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics
1 Introduction to Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics Lecture 3: Approaching Perfection Columbia University Reminder- From Lecture 2 2 A new state of matter (QGP?) is formed in Au+Au collisions at RHIC Densities
More informationBeam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model: an update
Beam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model: an update Iurii KARPENKO Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies/ Bogolyubov Institute for heoretical Physics ransport group meeting, December 17,
More informationGRAVITATIONAL COLLISIONS AND THE QUARK-GLUON PLASMA
GRAVITATIONAL COLLISIONS AND THE QUARK-GLUON PLASMA TOWARDS MORE REALISTIC MODELS OF THE QGP THERMALISATION Work with Michał Heller, David Mateos, Jorge Casalderrey, Paul Romatschke, Scott Pratt and Peter
More informationOverview of anisotropic flow measurements from ALICE
EPJ Web of Conferences 117, (2016) Overview of anisotropic flow measurements from ALICE You Zhou on behalf of the ALICE Collaboration Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract Anisotropic
More informationInitial baryon number fluctuations and its hydrodynamic propagation on a Bjorken background
Initial baryon number fluctuations and its hydrodynamic propagation on a Bjorken background Mauricio Martinez Guerrero In collaboration with Stefan Floerchinger arxiv:1507.05569 Correlations and Fluctuations
More informationBulk matter formed in Pb Pb collisions at the LHC
Bulk matter formed in Pb Pb collisions at the LHC Introductory remarks is quark matter at LHC in equilibrium? Energy dependence of hadron production and the quark hadron phase boundary The fireball expands
More informationAnisotropic Hydrodynamics
Anisotropic Hydrodynamics Is early isotropization Lecture 1 Michael Strickland Kent State University JET Summer School June 13, 2013 References: arxiv:1204.1473 (Martinez, Ryblewski, and MS) arxiv:1204.2624
More informationAnisotropic Flow: from RHIC to the LHC
Anisotropic Flow: from RHIC to the LHC Raimond Snellings The 2 nd Asian Triangle Heavy Ion Conference 13 th - 15 th October, 28 University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan arxiv:89.2949 [nucl-ex] 2 Elliptic
More informationThe unreasonable effectiveness of hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions
The unreasonable effectiveness of hydrodynamics in heavy ion collisions Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler Columbia University Yale University Sept. 10th, 2015 Outline 1 Heavy Ion Collisons 2 Initial conditions
More informationThermalization of Color Glass Condensate within Partonic Cascade BAMPS and Comparison with Bottom-Up Scenario.
Thermalization of Color Glass Condensate within Partonic Cascade BAMPS and Comparison with Bottom-Up Scenario. Shear viscosity from BAMPS Andrej El Zhe Xu Carsten Greiner Institut für Theoretische Physik
More informationPredictions for 5.02A TeV Pb+Pb Collisions from A Multi-Phase Transport Model
Predictions for 5.02A TeV Pb+Pb Collisions from A Multi-Phase Transport Model Zi-Wei Lin East Carolina University, Greenville, NC Results are mainly based on G.L. Ma & ZWL, Phys Rev C 93 (2016) /arxiv:1601.08160
More informationRecent Results from RHIC: On the trail of the Quark-Gluon Plasma
Recent Results from RHIC: On the trail of the Quark-Gluon Plasma Single Au+Au Collision seen by STAR@RHIC Gunther Roland Gunther Roland/MIT July 15 2003 MPI Munich 15/7/2003 Gunther Roland/MIT www.spiegel.de
More informationModeling Quark Gluon Plasma Using CHIMERA
Journal of Physics: Conference Series Modeling Quark Gluon Plasma Using CHIMERA o cite this article: Betty Abelev J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 6 View the article online for updates and enhancements. Related content
More informationECT*, Trento December 3, Collaborators: Vincenzo Greco Salvo Plumari Armando Puglisi Marco Ruggieri Francesco Scardina
ECT*, Trento December 3, 2015 Collaborators: Vincenzo Greco Salvo Plumari Armando Puglisi Marco Ruggieri Francesco Scardina initial stage pre-equilibrium hydrodynamical evolution hadronization freeze-out
More informationIntroduction to Heavy Ion Physics at the LHC
Introduction to Heavy Ion Physics at the LHC F. Noferini (noferini@bo.infn.it) INFN Bologna/CNAF E. Fermi Centre, Rome ALICE Review http://en.sif.it/journals/ncr/econtents/2016/039/10 24/10/2016 1 Hadrons
More informationRelativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions can a macroscopic approach be applied to a microscopic system?
Colloquium at Physics Dept., U. Jyväskylä, Finland, February 19, 2016 1 Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions can a macroscopic approach be applied to a microscopic system? Dirk H. Rischke
More informationStudies of QCD Matter From E178 at NAL to CMS at LHC
Studies of QCD Matter From E178 at NAL to CMS at LHC Wit Busza MIT Wit Busza Fermilab Colloquium, May 2012 1 The Study of the Condensed Matter of QCD, more commonly known as Relativistic Heavy Ion Physics
More informationAzimuthal anisotropy of the identified charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at S NN. = GeV at RHIC
Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER OPEN ACCESS Azimuthal anisotropy of the identified charged hadrons in Au+Au collisions at S NN = 39-200 GeV at RHIC To cite this article: S S Vdovkina 2017 J.
More informationRelativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions can a macroscopic approach be applied to a microscopic system? Dirk H. Rischke
Theoretical Physics Colloquium, USTC, Hefei, China, Nov. 9, 2018 1 Relativistic hydrodynamics for heavy ion collisions can a macroscopic approach be applied to a microscopic system? Dirk H. Rischke CRC
More informationUNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CATANIA INFN SEZIONE DI CATANIA
UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI CATANIA INFN SEZIONE DI CATANIA MOMENTUM ANISOTROPIES IN A TRANSPORT APPROACH V. BARAN, M. DI TORO, V. GRECO, S. PLUMARI Transport Theory with a Mean Field at fixed η/s. Effective
More informationModelling Early Time Dynamics of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions
Kyoto, 2015/10/05 Modelling Early Time Dynamics of Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Dr. Marco Ruggieri Physics and Astronomy Department, Catania University, Catania (Italy) Collaborators: Vincenzo Greco
More informationSmall Collision Systems at RHIC
EPJ Web of Conferences 7, (8) SQM 7 https://doi.org/.5/epjconf/87 Small Collision Systems at RHIC Norbert Novitzky, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 79, USA
More informationEquilibration and decoupling of a relativistic gas in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime
Equilibration and decoupling of a relativistic gas in a Friedmann-Robertson-Walker spacetime Juan M. Torres-Rincon (Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies) in collaboration with J. Tindall, J.-B. Rosé,
More informationFurther development of the hydrokinetic model and description of the RHIC and LHC A+A femtoscopic data
and description of the RHIC and LHC A+A femtoscopic data Iu.A. Karpenko Bogolyubov Institute for heoretical Physics, 1-b, Metrolohichna str., Kiev, 080, Ukraine E-mail: karpenko@bitp.kiev.ua Bogolyubov
More informationStrongly interacting quantum fluids: Experimental status
Strongly interacting quantum fluids: Experimental status Thomas Schaefer North Carolina State University Perfect fluids: The contenders QGP (T=180 MeV) Liquid Helium (T=0.1 mev) Trapped Atoms (T=0.1 nev)
More informationHydrodynamic modelling for relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC and LHC
PRAMANA c Indian Academy of Sciences Vol. 84, No. 5 journal of May 2015 physics pp. 703 715 Hydrodynamic modelling for relativistic heavy-ion collisions at RHIC and LHC HUICHAO SONG 1,2, 1 Department of
More informationOverview of heavy ion CMS results
Overview of heavy ion CMS results Gian Michele Innocenti on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Massachusetts Institute of echnology Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions March 19th - 26th,
More informationOutline: Introduction and Motivation
Heavy ion collisions at lower energies: challenges and opportunities Beam Energy Scan (BES I and II) from RHIC Lijuan Ruan (Brookhaven National Laboratory) Outline: Introduction and Motivation Results
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 31 Oct 2012
Hydro overview Jean-Yves Ollitrault a, Fernando G. Gardim b a CNRS, URA2306, IPhT, Institut de physique théorique de Saclay, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France b Instituto de Física, Universidade de São Paulo,
More informationQuantifying the Sensitivity of Experimental Data to Variations in the QGP Equation of State
Quantifying the Sensitivity of Experimental Data to Variations in the QGP Equation of State Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory E-mail: soltz@llnl.gov We have developed a framework, the Comprehensive
More informationQuark chemical equilibrabon for thermal photon ellipbc flow
AM, Phys. Rev. C 90, 021901(R) (2014) AM, arxiv:1408.1410 [nucl- th] Quark chemical equilibrabon for thermal photon ellipbc flow Akihiko Monnai RIKEN BNL Research Center Nishina Center for Accelerator-
More informationSummary of flow and its correlation in ALICE
Summary of flow and its correlation in ALICE Myunggeun Song Yonsei Univ. November, 6 HIM 6 @ ibs Based on PRL his Presentation based on one Letter in six is highlighted as a Suggestion due to its particular
More informationDirect Photon Results from ALICE and the Direct Photon Puzzle
Direct Photon Results from ALICE and the Direct Photon Puzzle Ab initio approaches in many-body QCD confront heavy-ion experiments December 15-17, 2014 Klaus Reygers Physikalisches Institut University
More informationQuark Gluon Plasma Recent Advances
Quark Gluon Plasma Recent Advances Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory LP01, Rome, July 2001 Introduction P.C. Sereno et al. Science, Nov. 13, 1298(1998). (Spinosaurid) We may not see the entire body
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 11 Aug 2013
Flow in p-pb collisions at the LHC arxiv:8.7v [nucl-th] Aug Wojciech Broniowski he H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, - Cracow, Poland and Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University,
More informationAdrian Dumitru. pp, pa, AA: - forward dijets - near-side long-range rapidity correlations
Small Small xx QCD: QCD: from from pa/aa pa/aa at at RHIC/LHC RHIC/LHC to to the the eic eic Adrian Dumitru RIKEN-BNL and Baruch College/CUNY AA: dn/dy, det/dy, eccentricity ε pa: forward dn/dpt2 2-point
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-th] 2 Mar 2015
The domain of validity of fluid dynamics and the onset of cavitation in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions arxiv:503.0053v [nucl-th] 2 Mar 205 Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 University
More informationBeam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model
Beam energy scan using a viscous hydro+cascade model Iurii KARPENKO INFN sezione Firenze In collaboration with Marcus Bleicher, Pasi Huovinen and Hannah Petersen Iurii Karpenko (INFN) BES in a viscous
More informationEvent anisotropy at RHIC
Event anisotropy at RHIC Nu Xu - LBNL 1) Introduction 2) Experimental details and 200 GeV results v 2 (m 0, p T, y, b, A) 3) Summary and outlook PHENIX: N. Ajitanand, S. Esumi, R. Lacey, J. Rak PHOBOS:
More informationarxiv: v1 [nucl-ex] 10 Feb 2012
Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 1-5 Author version Central European Journal of Physics Highlights of the Beam Energy Scan from STAR Review Article arxiv:10.389v1 [nucl-ex] 10 Feb 01 A. Schmah for the STAR Collaboration
More informationDIRECTED FLOW IN HOLOGRAPHIC HEAVY ION COLLISIONS
DIRECTED FLOW IN HOLOGRAPHIC HEAVY ION COLLISIONS TOWARDS MORE REALISTIC MODELS OF QGP FORMATION Based on work with Michał Heller, David Mateos, Jorge Casalderrey, Miquel Triana, Paul Romatschke, Scott
More informationJet quenching in pa and AA
Jet quenching in pa and AA Jefferson Lab Electron Ion Collider User Group Meeting Catholic University of America, Washington D.C, USA July 30 - August 2, 2018 Collectivity in AA and pa CMS Collaboration,
More informationUnraveling the Mysteries of the Strongly Interacting Quark-Gluon-Plasma. Steffen A. Bass
Hot andhep101: Dense Heavy-Ion QCD Matter Collisions Unraveling the Mysteries of the Strongly Interacting Quark-Gluon-Plasma A Community White Paper on the Future of Relativistic Heavy-Ion Physics in the
More informationCollective Dynamics of the p+pb Collisions
Collective Dynamics of the p+pb Collisions Wojciech Broniowski CEA Saclay & UJK Kielce & IFJ PAN Cracow th Workshop on Non-Perturbative QCD Paris, - June [Piotr Bo»ek & WB, PLB 78 () 557, 7 () 5, arxiv:.]
More informationAzimuthal angle dependence of HBT radii with respect to the Event Plane in Au+Au collisions at PHENIX
Azimuthal angle dependence of HBT radii with respect to the Event Plane in Au+Au collisions at PHENIX TTaakkaaffuummii NNiiiiddaa ffoorr tthhee PPHHEENNIIXX CCoollllaabboorraattiioonn UUnniivveerrssiittyy
More informationJet and bulk observables within a partonic transport approach
Jet and bulk observables within a partonic transport approach Florian Senzel with J. Uphoff, O. Fochler, C. Wesp, Z. Xu and C. Greiner based on Phys.Rev.Lett. 4 (25) 23 Transport meeting, 29.4.25 Outline
More informationCreating a Quark Gluon Plasma With Heavy Ion Collisions
Creating a Quark Gluon Plasma With Heavy Ion Collisions David Hofman UIC Special thanks to my Collaborators in PHOBOS, STAR, & CMS and B. Back, M. Baker, R. Hollis, K. Rajagopal, R. Seto, and P. Steinberg
More informationStrangeness production and nuclear modification at LHC energies
Strangeness production and nuclear modification at LHC energies Oliver Busch for the ALICE collaboration 1 Outline introduction jet azimuthal anisotropy jet shapes 2 Introduction 3 Jets: seeing quarks
More informationAway-Side Angular Correlations Associated with Heavy Quark Jets
Away-Side Angular Correlations Associated with Heavy Quark Jets Jorge Noronha Presented by: William Horowitz The Ohio State University Based on: J.N, Gyulassy, Torrieri, arxiv:0807.1038 [hep-ph] and Betz,
More informationFlow Results and Hints of Incomplete Thermalization
Flow Results and Hints of Incomplete Thermalization for the STAR Collaboration 1 The Perfect Liquid Γ s = 4 η(e + p) 3 D. Teaney, PRC 68 034913 (003) Viscosity reduces v Viscosity needs to be small in
More informationFLOW STUDIES IN NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISIONS AT FAIR-GSI AVAILABLE ENERGIES
(c) 2017 Rom. Rep. Phys. (for accepted papers only) FLOW STUDIES IN NUCLEUS-NUCLEUS COLLISIONS AT FAIR-GSI AVAILABLE ENERGIES O. RISTEA 1, C. RISTEA 1,2,a, A. JIPA 1, T. PETRUSE 1, T. ESANU 3, M. CALIN
More informationThermal dileptons as fireball probes at SIS energies
Thermal dileptons as fireball probes at SIS energies Critical Point and Onset of Deconfinement 2016, Wrocław. Florian Seck TU Darmstadt in collaboration with T. Galatyuk, P. M. Hohler, R. Rapp & J. Stroth
More information