arxiv: v4 [cs.gr] 23 Nov 2015

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "arxiv: v4 [cs.gr] 23 Nov 2015"

Sydney Atkinson
5 years ago
Views:

1 A de Casteljau Algorithm for Bernstein type Polynomials based on (p, q)-integers arxiv: v4 [cs.gr 3 Nov 05 Khalid Khan, ) D.K. Lobiyal ) and Adem ilicman ) ) School of Computer and System Sciences, SC & SS, J.N.U., New Delhi-0067., India halidga57@gmail.com; dlobiyal@gmail.com ) Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University Putra Malaysia, Malaysia ailicman@putra.upm.edu.my Abstract In this paper, a de Casteljau algorithm to compute (p, q)-bernstein Bézier curves based on (p, q)- integers is introduced. We study the nature of degree elevation and degree reduction for (p, q)-bézier Bernstein functions. The new curves have some properties similar to q-bézier curves. Moreover, we construct the corresponding tensor product surfaces over the rectangular domain (u, v) [0, [0, depending on four parameters. We also study the de Casteljau algorithm and degree evaluation properties of the surfaces for these generalization over the rectangular domain. Furthermore, some fundamental properties for (p, q)-bernstein Bézier curves are discussed. We get q-bézier curves and surfaces for (u,v) [0, [0, when we set the parameter p = p =. Keywords and phrases: (p, q)-integers; Degree elevation; Degree reduction; de Casteljau algorithm; tensor product; (p, q)-bernstein polynomials; q-bernstein polynomials; (p, q)-bézier curve; (p, q)-bézier surface; Shape preserving; Total positivity. MSC: primary 65D7; secondary 4A0, 4A5, 4A36.: Introduction Recently, Mursaleen et al [9, 0 applied ()-calculus in approximation theory and introduced the first (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein operators based on (p, q)-integers. Motivated by the wor of Mursaleen et al [9, 0, the idea of (p, q)-calculus and its importance. We construct (p, q)-bézier curves and surfaces based on (p, q)-integers which is further generalization of q-bézier curves and surfaces. For similar wors based on ()-integers, one can refer [,, 3, 5,, 5. It was S.N. Bernstein [ in 9, who first introduced his famous operatorsb n : C[0, C[0, defined for any n N and for any function f C[0, B n (f;x) = ( n =0 ) ( ) x ( x) n f, x [0,. (.) n and named it Bernstein polynomials to prove the Weierstrass theorem [7. Later it was found that Bernstein polynomials possess many remarable properties and has various applications in areas such as approximation theory [7, numerical analysis, computer-aided geometric design, and solutions of differential equations due to its fine properties of approximation [9.

2 In computer aided geometric design (CAGD), Bernstein polynomials and its variants are used in order to preserve the shape of the curves or surfaces. One of the most important curve in CAGD [4 is the classical Bézier curve [ constructed with the help of Bernstein basis functions. In recent years, generalization of the Bézier curve with shape parameters has received continuous attention. Several authors were concerned with the problem of changing the shape of curves and surfaces, while eeping the control polygon unchanged and thus they generalized the Bézier curves in [5, 8, 9. The rapid development of q-calculus [3 has led to the discovery of new generalizations of Bernstein polynomials involving q-integers [8, 6, 9. The aim of these generalizations is to provide appropriate and powerful tools to application areas such as numerical analysis, computer-aided geometric design, and solutions of differential equations. In 987, Lupaş [8 introduced the first q-analogue of Bernstein operator as follows L n,q (f;x) = =0 f ( ) [ [ q n [n q n j= q ( ) x ( x) n q {( x)+q j x} and investigated its approximating and shape-preserving properties., (.) In 996, Phillips [7 proposed another q-variant of the classical Bernstein operator, the so-called Phillips q-bernstein operator which attracted lots of investigations. B n,q (f;x) = [ n =0 n x q s=0 ( ( q s [q x) f [n q where B n,q : C[0, C[0, defined for any n N and any function f C[0,. ), x [0, (.3) The q-variants of Bernstein polynomials provide one shape parameter for constructing free-form curves and surfaces, Phillips q-bernstein operator was applied well in this area. In 003, Oru and Phillips [9 used the basis functions of Phillips q-bernstein operator for construction of q-bézier curves, which they call Phillips q-bézier curves, and studied the properties of degree reduction and elevation. Thus with the development of (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein operators and its variants, one natural question arises, how it can be used in order to preserve the shape of the curves or surfaces. In this way, it opens a new research direction which requires further investigations. Before proceeding further, let us recall certain notations of (p, q)-calculus. The () integers [n are defined by [n = pn q n, n = 0,,,, p > q > 0. p q The formula for (p, q)-binomial expansion is as follow: (ax+by) n := n =0 [ p (n )(n ) q ( ) n a n b x n y, (x+y) n = (x+y)(px+qy)(p x+q y) (p n x+q n y), ( x) n = ( x)(p qx)(p q x) (p n q n x),

3 where (p, q)-binomial coefficients are defined by [ n [n! = [![n!. Details on ()-calculus can be found in [6, 9,. The (p, q)-bernstein Operators introduced by Mursaleen et al is as follow: B n, (f;x) = p n(n ) [ n =0 p ( ) x n s=0 ( ) (p s q s [ x) f p n, x [0, (.4) [n Note when p =,(p, q)-bernstein Operators given by(.4) turns out to be q-bernstein Operators. Also, we have n ( x) n = (p s q s x) = ( x)(p qx)(p q x)...(p n q n x) = s=0 =0 [ ( ) p (n )(n ) q ( ) n x Again by some simple calculations and using the property of(p, q)-integers, we get(p, q)-analogue of Pascal s relation as follow: [ [ [ n = q n j n +p j n (.5) [ [ [ n = p n j n +q j n (.6) We apply (p, q)-calculus and introduce first the (p, q)-bézier curves and surfaces based on (p, q)-integers which is further generalization of q-bézier curves and surfaces, for example, [8, 9. The outline of this paper is as follow: Section introduces a ()-analogue of the Bernstein functions B,n and their Properties. Section 3 introduces degree elevation and degree reduction properties for (p, q)-analogue of the Bernstein functions. Section 4 introduces a de Casteljau type algorithm for B,n. In Section 5 we define a tensor product patch based on algorithm and its geometric properties as well as a degree elevation technique are investigated. Furthermore tensor product of (p, q)-bézier surfaces on [0, [0, for (p, q)-bernstein polynomials are introduced and its properties that is inherited from the univariate case are being discussed. (p, q)-bernstein functions The (p, q)-bernstein functions is as follows [ B,n n (t) = p n(n ) p ( ) t ( t) n, t [0, (.) 3

4 where n ( t) n = (p s q s t) s=0. Properties of the (p, q)-analogue of the Bernstein functions Theorem. The (p, q)-analogue of the Bernstein functions possess the following properties: (.) Non-negativity: B,n (t) 0 = 0,,...,n, t [0,. (.) Partition of unity: =0 B,n (t) =, for every t [0,. (3.)Both sided end-point property: B,n (0) = B(),n =, if = 0 0, 0, if = n 0, n when p =, then both side end point interpolation property holds. (3.) Reducibility: when p =, formula (.) reduces to the q-bernstein bases. Proof: All these property can be deduced easily from equation (.). 4

5 ,3 B,3 B,3 B 3,3 B q = 0.8 and p = Figure : Cubic Bezier blending functions ,3 B,3 B,3 B 3,3 B q = 0.5 and p =.8 Figure : Cubic Bezier blending functions 5

6 Fig. shows the ()-analogues of the Bernstein basis functions of degree 3 with q = 0.5,p =.8. Here we can observe that sum of blending fuctions is always unity and also end point interpolation propertyholds, when we put p =, it turns out to be q-bernstein basiswhich is shown in Fig.. Apart from the basic properties above, the (p, q)-analogue of the Bernstein functions also satisfy some recurrence relations, as for the classical Bernstein basis. 3 Degree elevation and reduction for (p, q)- Bernstein functions Technique of degree elevation has been used to increase the flexibility of a given curve. A degree elevation algorithm calculates a new set of control points by choosing a convex combination of the old set of control points which retains the old end points. For this purpose, the identities (3.3),(3.4) and Theorem (3.) are useful. Theorem 3. Each (p, q)-bernstein functions of degree n is a linear combination of two (p, q)- Bernstein functions of degree n : B,n (t) = q n p t B,n (t)+(p n p q n t) B,n (t) (3.) B,n (t) = pn t B,n (t)+(q p n q n t) B,n (t) (3.) Proof: On using Pascal s type relation based on (p, q)-integers i.e (.5), we get ( [ [ ) B,n (t) = q n n +p p n(n ) n p ( ) t ( t) n = = + p n(n ) p n(n ) p n(n ) [ q n n q n p t = q n p t B,n p ( ) t ( t) n + [ n p (p n q n t) p n(n ) p ( )( ) t ( t) n [ n (t)+(p n p q n t) B,n (t) p [ n p ( ) t ( t) n p ( ) t ( t) n Thus B,n (t) = q n p t B,n (t)+(p n p q n t) B,n (t) Similarly, if we use (.6), we have B,n (t) = pn t B,n (t)+(q p n q n t) B,n (t) Degree elevation 6

7 ( ) q n p t B,n (t) = p+ [n B +,n+ (t) (3.3) [n+ (p n p q n t) B,n (t) = ( p ) [n+ [n+ B,n+ (t) (3.4) Proof: q n p t B,n (t) = p n(n ) ([ n q n p t = q n [ + [n+ p n(n ) = q n [ + B +,n+ (t) [n+ By some simple calculation, we have p ( ) t ( t) n ([ n+ + ) p (+)() t + ( t) n ) using this result, we get similarly on considering, (p n p q n t) B,n (t) = (pn p q n t) q n [ + [n+ = p+ [n [n+, ( ) q n p t B,n (t) = p+ [n [n+ = (pn p q n t) (p n q n t) ( p n(n ) p n(n ) [ n [n+ [n+ B +,n+ (t), p ( ) t ( t) n ([ n+ ) p ( ) t ( t) n+ ) finally we get ( p ) (p n p q n t) B,n (t) = [n+ [n+ B,n+ (t) Theorem 3. Each ()-Bernstein function of degree n is a linear combination of two ()- Bernstein functions of degree n+. ( p n ) ( ) B,n (t) = [n+ B,n+ (t)+p n p+ [n B +,n+ (t) (3.5) [n+ [n+ 7

8 Proof From equation 3.3,3.4 we can easily get ( p n ) ( ) B,n (t) = [n+ B,n+ (t)+p n p+ [n [n+ [n+ B +,n+ (t). For n = 3, the blending functions are given by: B 0,3 = [ 3 p 3 ( t)(p qt)(p 0 q t) B,3 = p 3 [ 3 B,3 = p 3 [ 3 [ B 3,3 3 = 3 t( t)(p qt) pt ( t) We observed that the both sided end point interpolation property and partition of unity property always holds in case of (p, q)-bernstein functions. The de Casteljau algorithm describes how to subdivide a Bézier curve, when a Bézier curve is repeatedly subdivided, the collection of control polygons converge to the curve. Thus, the way of computing a Bézier curve is to simply subdivide it an appropriate number of times and compute the control polygons. t 3 4 (p, q)-bernstein Bézier curves: Let us define the (p, q)-bézier curves of degree n using the (p, q)-analogues of the Bernstein functions as follows: P(t;) = i=0 P i B i,n (t) (4.) where P i R 3 (i = 0,,...,n) and p > q > 0. P i are control points. Joining up adjacent points P i, i = 0,,,...,nto obtain a polygon which is called the control polygon of ()-Bzier curves. 4. Some basic properties of (p, q)-bézier curves. Theorem 4. From the definition, we can derive some basic properties of (p, q)-bézier curves:. (p, q)-bézier curves have geometric and affine invariance.. (p, q)-bézier curves lie inside the convex hull of its control polygon. 3. The end-point interpolation property: P(0;) = P 0, P(;) = P n. 3. Reducibility: when p =, formula 4. gives the q-bézier curves. Proof. These properties of (p, q)-bézier curves can be easily deduced from corresponding properties of the (p, q)-analogue of the Bernstein functions. 8

9 4. Degree elevation for (p, q)-bézier curves (p, q)-bézier curves have a degree elevation algorithm that is similar to that possessed by the classical Bézier curves. Using the technique of degree elevation, we can increase the flexibility of a given curve. where P(t;) = =0 =0 P B,n (t) n+ P(t;) = P B i+,n (t), ( ) ( ) P = p n p [n+ [n+ P +p n P (4.) [n+ [n+ The statement above can be derived using the identities (3.3)and(3.4). Consider We obtain p n P(t;) = (p n p q n t) P(t;)+p q n t P(t;). p n P(t;) = =0 ( p [n+ [n+ ) P 0 B,n+ (t) + =0 ( ) p+ [n P 0 [n+ B +,n+ (t) Now by shifting the limits, we have n+ ( p n P(t;) = p [n+ ) P 0 [n+ B,n+ (t) + =0 n+ =0 ( ) p [n+ [n+ where P 0 is defined as the zero vector. Comparing coefficients on both side, we have or In general p n P = P = ( p [n+ ) ( ) P 0 + p [n+ P 0 [n+ [n+ ( p [n+ ( ) n )P 0 +p n p [n+ P 0 [n+ [n+. ( P r = p [n+r ) ( ) n P r +p n p [n+ P r [n+r [n+ P 0 B,n+ (t) where r =,...n and i = 0,,,...,n+r When p =, formula 4.4 reduce to the degree evaluation formula of the q-bézier curves. If we let P = (P 0,P,...,P n ) T denote the vector of control points of the initial ()-Bézier curve of degree n, and P () = (P0,P,...,P n+ ) the vector of control points of the degree elevated ()-Bézier curve of degree n+, then we can represent the degree elevation procedure as: where P () = T n+ P, 9

10 T n+ = [n+ [n+ p n ([n+ p[ ) p n. [ 0... p n ([n+ p [n ) p n [n p 0 n 4 [n+ p n (n+) (n+) For any l N, the vectorof control points of the degree elevated ()-Bzier curvesof degree n+l is: P (l) = T n+l T n+...t n+ P. As l, the control polygon P (l) converges to a ()-Bézier curve. 4.3 de Casteljau algorithm: ()-Bézier curves of degree n can be written as two inds of linear combination of two ()-Bézier curves of degree n, and we can get the two selectable algorithms to evaluate ()-Bézier curves. The algorithms can be expressed as: Algorithm. or Then P 0 i (t;) P0 i P i i = 0,,...,n P r i (t;) = pr t P r i+ (t;)+(q p r i q r t) P r i (t;) r =,...,n, i = 0,,...,n r., P 0 i (t;) P0 i P i i = 0,,...,n P r i (t;) = pi q r t P r i+ (t;)+(pr p q r i t) P r i (t;) r =,...,n, i = 0,,...,n r., (4.3) (4.4) n P(t;) = P i (t;) =... = P r i(t;) B i,n r (t) =... = P n 0 (t;) (4.5) i=0 It is clear that the results can be obtained from Theorem (??). When p =, formula (4.3) and (4.4) recover the de Casteljau algorithms of classical q-bézier curves. Let P 0 = (P 0,P,...,P n ) T, P r = (P r 0,Pr,...,Pr n r )T, then de Casteljau algorithm can be expressed as: Algorithm. P r (t;) = M r (t;)...m (t;)m (t;)p 0 (4.6) where M r (t;) is a (n r+) (n r +) matrix and (p r q r t) p r t (qp r q r t) p r t 0 0 M r (t;) = (q n r p r n q r t) p r t (q n r p r n q r t) p r t 0

11 or (p r q r t) q r t (p r pq r t) pq r t 0 0 M r (t;) = (p r p n r q n t) p n r q n t 5 Tensor product (p, q)-bernstein Bézier surfaces on [0, [0, We define a two-parameter family P(u,v) of tensor product surfaces of degree m n as follow: P(u,v) = m i=0 j=0 P i,j B i,m p,q (u) B j,n p,q (v), (u,v) [0, [0,, (5.) where P i,j R 3 (i = 0,,...,m,j = 0,,...,n) and two real numbers p > q > 0, p > q > 0, b i,m p,q (u), b j,n p,q (v) are ()-analogue of Bernstein functions respectively with the parameter p,q and p,q. We call the parameter surface tensor product ()-Bézier surface with degree m n. We refer to the P i,j as the control points. By joining up adjacent points in the same row or column to obtain a net which is called the control net of tensor product (p, q)-bézier surface. 5. Properties. Geometric invariance and affine invariance property: Since m i=0 j=0 P(u,v) is an affine combination of its control points. B i,m p,q (u) B j,n p,q (v) =, (5.). Convex hull property: P(u,v) is a convex combination of P i,j and lies in the convex hull of its control net. 3. Isoparametric curves property: The isoparametric curves v = v and u = u of a tensor product(p, q)-bézier surface are respectively the (p, q)-bézier curves of degree m and degree n, namely, P(u,v ) = P(u,v) = m ( n ) P i,j Bp j,n,q (v ) Bp i,m,q (u), u [0,; i=0 j=0 j=0 ( m ) P i,j Bp j,n,q (u ) Bp i,m,q (v), v [0, i=0 The boundary curves of P(u,v) are evaluated by P(u,0), P(u,), P(0,v) and P(,v). 4. Corner point interpolation property: The corner control net coincide with the four corners of the surface. Namely, P(0,0) = P 0,0, P(0,) = P 0,n, P(,0) = P m,0, P(,) = P m,n, 5. Reducibility: When p = p =, formula (5.) reduces to a tensor product q-bézier patch.

12 5. Degree elevation and de Casteljau algorithm Let P(u,v) be a tensor product ()-Bézier surface of degree m n. As an example, let us tae obtaining the same surface as a surface of degree (m+) (n+). Hence we need to find new control points P i,j such that P(u,v) = m i=0 j=0 P i,j B i,m p,q (u) B j,n p,q (v) = ( ) Let α i = p m pi [m+ i p,q [m+, β j = p n p,q Then ( pj m+ i=0 n+ j=0 [n+ j p,q [n+ p,q ). P i,j B i,m+ p,q (u) B j,n+ p,q (v) (5.3) P i,j = α i β j P i,j +α i ( β j ) P i,j +( α i ) ( β j ) P i,j (5.4) which can be written in matrix form as [ ( ) [ p m pi [m+ i p,q p i m [m+ i p,q Pi,j P i,j [m+ p,q [m+ p,q P i,j P i,j ) p n ( pj [n+ j p,q [n+ p,q p j n [n+ j p,q [n+ p,q The de Casteljau algorithms are also easily extended to evaluate points on a (p, q)-bézier surface. Given the control net P i,j R 3,i = 0,,...,m, j = 0,,...,n. or P 0,0 i,j (u,v) P0,0 i,j P i,j i = 0,,...,m; j = 0,,...n. P r,r i,j (u,v) = [ (q ipr i q r u) p r u [ P r,r i,j P r,r i+,j P r,r i,j+ P r,r i+,j+ r =,...,, = min(m,n) i = 0,,...,m r; j = 0,,...n r [(q j v) pr j q r p r v (5.5) P 0,0 i,j (u,v) P0,0 i,j P i,j i = 0,,...,m; j = 0,,...n. P r,r i,j (u,v) = [ (p r p i qr i u) p i qr i u [ P r,r i,j P r,r i+,j P r,r i,j+ P r,r i+,j+ [(p r v) p j qr j p j qr j v r =,...,, = min(m,n) i = 0,,...,m r; j = 0,,...n r (5.6) When m = n, one can directly use the algorithms above to get a point on the surface. When m n, to get a point on the surface after applications of formula (5.5) or (5.6), we perform formula (4.6) for the intermediate point P, i,j. Note: We get q-bézier curves and surfaces for (u,v) [0, [0, when we set the parameter p = p = as proved in [3, 4.

13 6 Shape control of (p, q)-bernstein curves We have constructed (p, q)-bernstein functions which holds both the end point interpolation property as shown in figure and. Parameter p and q has been used to control the shape of curves and surfaces: if 0 < q < p, as p and q decreases, the curve moves close to the control polygon, as p and q increases, the curve moves far away from the control polygon; If p > and q >, the effects of p and q are opposite, as p and q decreases, the curve moves far away from the control polygon, as p and q increases, the curve moves close to the control polygon. Figure 3, 4, 5, 6and7 shows (p, q)-bernstein function approximating the surface generated by control points. 7 6 For q=., p=.5 For q=.4, p=.9 For q=.9, p= control polygon Figure 3: Bézier curve 7 6 For q=, p=5 For q=5, p=5 For q=0, p=5 control polygon Figure 4: Bézier curve 3

14 7 6 For q=., p=.99 For q=.5, p=.99 For q=.7, p=.99 control polygon Figure 5: Bézier curve 7 6 For q=.3, p=.5 For q=.3, p=.7 For q=.3, p=.9 control polygon Figure 6: Bézier curve References [ S. N. Bernstein, Constructive proof of Weierstrass approximation theorem, Comm. Kharov Math. Soc. (9) [ P.E. Bézier, Numerical Control-Mathematics and applications, John Wiley and Sons, London, 97. [3 Cetin Disibuyu and Halil Oruc, Tensor Product q-bernstein Polynomials, BIT Numerical Mathematics, Springer 48 (008) [4 Cetin Disibuyu. Tensor Product q-bernstein Bézier Patches, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 009. [5 Rida T. Faroui, V. T. Rajan, Algorithms for polynomials in Bernstein form, Computer Aided Geometric Design, Volume 5, Issue, June

15 7 6 For q=5, p=0 For q=5, p=5 For q=5, p=5 control polygon Figure 7: Bézier curve [6 R. Jagannathan, K. Srinivasa Rao, Two-parameter quantum algebras, twin-basic numbers, and associated generalized hypergeometric series, Proceedings of the International Conference on Number Theory and Mathematical Physics, 0- December 005. [7 P. P. Korovin, Linear operators and approximation theory, Hindustan Publishing Corporation, Delhi, 960. [8 A. Lupaş, A q-analogue of the Bernstein operator, Seminar on Numerical and Statistical Calculus, University of Cluj-Napoca, 9(987) [9 M. Mursaleen, K. J. Ansari, A. Khan, On (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein Operators, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 66 (05) [0 M. Mursaleen, K. J. Ansari, A. Khan, On (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein Operators (Revised), arxive: [ M. Mursaleen and Md. Nasiruzzaman, On (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein-Schurer operators, arxiv: v [math.ca. [ M. Mursaleen, K. J. Ansari and Asif Khan,, Some Approximation Results by (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein-Stancu Operators, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 64,(05), [3 M. Mursaleen, K. J. Ansari and Asif Khan, Approximation by a (p, q)-analogue of Bernstein- Kantorovich Operators, arxiv: [ [math.CA [4 M. Mursaleen, Faisal Khan and Asif Khan, Approximation by (p, q)-lorentz polynomials on a compact dis, arxiv: v [math.ca. [5 M. Mursaleen, Md. Nasiruzzaman, Asif Khan and Khursheed J. Ansari, Some approximation results on Bleimann-Butzer-Hahn operators defined by (p, q)-integers, arxiv: v [math.ca. [6 M. Mursaleen, Asif Khan, Generalized q-bernstein-schurer Operators and Some Approximation Theorems, Journal of Function Spaces and Applications Volume 03, Article ID 79834, 7 pages [7 G.M. Phillips, Bernstein polynomials based on the q-integers,the heritage of P.L.Chebyshev, Ann. Numer. Math., 4 (997)

16 [8 Li-Wen Hana, Ying Chua, Zhi-Yu Qiu, Generalized Bézier curves and surfaces based on Lupaş q- analogue of Bernstein operator, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 6 (04) [9 Halil Oru, George M. Phillips, q-bernstein polynomials and Bézier curves, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 5 (003) -. [0 N. I. Mahmudov and P. Sabancgil, Some approximation properties of Lupaş q-analogue of Bernstein operators, arxiv:0.445v [math.fa 0 Dec 00. [ Mahouton Norbert Hounonnou, Joseph Désiré Buweli Kyemba, R(p, q)-calculus: differentiation and integration, SUT Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 49, No. (03), [ Vishnu Narayan Mishra, Shiha Pandey, Approximation properties of Chlodowsy variant of (p, q)-bernstein-stancu-schurer operators, arxiv: v [3 K. Victor, C. Poman, Quantum Calculus, Springer-Verlag (00), New Yor Berlin Heidelberg. [4 Thomas W. Sederberg, Computer Aided Geometric Design Course Notes, Department of Computer Science Brigham Young University, October 9, 04. [5 Abdul Wafi, Nadeem Rao, Approximation properties of ()-variant of Stancu-Schurer and Kantorovich-Stancu-Schurer operators, arxiv: v. 6

Some Approximation Results For (p, q)-lupaş-schurer Operators

Some Approximation Results For (p, q)-lupaş-schurer Operators Filomat 3:1 018, 17 9 https://doi.org/10.98/fil180117k Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat Some Approimation Results