arxiv:quant-ph/ Jun 1999

Transcription

1 EPJ manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds arxiv:quant-ph/ Jun 1999 Jan Pe»rina Jr. 1 Joint Laboratory of Optics of Palacký University and Institute of Physics of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic perina j@sloup.upol.cz 17. listopadu 50, Olomouc Czech Republic Abstract. The dependence of one- and two-photon characteristics of pulsed entangled two-photon elds generated in spontaneous parametric down-conversion on the pump-pulse properties (shape of the pumppulse spectrum and its internal structure) is examined. It is shown that entangled two-photon elds with dened properties can be generated. A general relation between the spectra of the down-converted elds is established. As a special case interference of two partially overlapping pulsed two-photon elds is studied. Fourth-order interference pattern of entangled two-photon elds is investigated in the polarization analog of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer. PACS. 1 Introduction k Nonlinear optics 4.65.Ky Harmonic generation, frequency conversion Over the last decades, the process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion in nonlinear crystals pumped by cw lasers has been extensively studied [1,, 3]. Nonclassical properties of entangled two-photon light generated by this process have been used many times for successful tests of quantum mechanics []. Recently a great deal of attention has been devoted to the properties of spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by femtosecond pulses. The main reason is that femtosecond pump-pulse duration may provide time synchronization of several entangled two-photon elds [4, 5] and create this way more than two mutually entangled photon elds. Such elds have already been successfully used when observing quantum teleportation [6] and generating GH states [7,8,9]. The basic theoretical model of down-conversion process pumped by an (ultrashort) pulse has been developed in [10,11]. It has been studied in detail for a Gaussian pump pulse. It has been shown that ultrashort pump-pulse duration leads in general to a loss of visibility as a consequence of partial" distinguishability of photons introduced by the pump pulse [10, 11]. Spectral aspects of the process are studied in [1]. Coincidencecount interference pattern has been already measured in case when the down-converted elds propagate through narrow frequency lters [11,13]. The effect of dispersion in the down-converted elds on the coincidence-count interference pattern has been studied in [14]. Fourth-order interference of two two-photon down-converted elds has been investigated in the setting where the Mach-ehnder interferometer is placed into the path of one of the output elds coming from the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer [15]. Pulsed parametric frequency conversion can also provide pulsed squeezed light [16]. In the above mentioned papers a Gaussian pump-pulse spectrum has been assumed. In the paper we study how the pump-eld spectral characteristics (shape and internal structure of the spectrum) influence the properties of down-converted elds. This may nd an application in the generation of entangled two-photon elds with dened properties. Both one-photon (spectrum and timedependent mean photon number) and two-photon (coincidence-count rates) characteristics are investigated. Twophoton characteristics are considered in the polarization analog of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer. Because the down-converted elds are strongly influenced by the internal structure of the pump spectrum, we consider the case in which the overall pump spectrum is composed of the spectra of two mutually coherent ultrashort pulses. As a special case two-photon interference of two partially overlapping two-photon elds is investigated. Spontaneous parametric down-conversion The process of spontaneous parametric down-conversion is described by the following interaction Hamiltonian [1]: ^H int (t) = 0 dz χ () E p (z; t) L ( ) ( ) ^E 1 (z; t) ^E (z; t) + h.c.; (1)

2 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds where χ () is the second-order susceptibility, E p denotes the positive-frequency part of the electric-eld amplitude of the pump eld, and ^E( ) 1 ( ^E( ) ) is the negative-frequency part of the electric-eld operator of down-converted eld 1 (). The nonlinear crystal extends from z = L to z =0. The symbol h.c. means Hermitian conjugate. The wave function jψ () (0;t)i describing an entangled two-photon state at z = 0 (at the output plane of the crystal) for times t sufciently long so that the nonlinear interaction is complete can be obtained in the form (for details, see [14]): jψ () (0;t)i = C ψ exp[i(! 0 1 +! 0 )t] exp dν 1» i νp 0 dz L dν p dν E p (0;ν p )^a y 1 (ν 1)^a y (ν ) ν 1 ν v p v 1 v z f(ν p ν 1 ν ) exp [i(ν 1 + ν )t] jvaci; () where ν j =! j! j 0 for j = p; 1;. The symbol E p (0;ν p ) denotes the spectrum of the positive-frequency part of the envelope of the pump-eld amplitude at the output plane of the crystal; ^a y 1 (ν 1)[^a y (ν )] means the creation operator of the mode with wave vector k 1 (k ) and frequency! 1 0 +ν 1 (! +ν 0 )indown-converted eld 1 (). The symbol! j 0 stands for the central frequency of eld j (j =1; ;p) and 1=v j denotes the inverse of group velocity of eld j [1=v j = dk j =(d! kj )j!kj =! 0 ]. The susceptibility χ () is included in the constant C ψ.frequency- and wave-vector j phase matching for central frequencies (! p 0 =! 1 0 +! ) 0 and central wave vectors (kp 0 = k1 0 + k), 0 respectively, are assumed to be fullled when deriving Eq. (). We note that spontaneous parametric process is so weak that the pump-pulse depletion can be omitted even when intense ultrashort pump pulses are considered. and (4) into Eq. (3) we arrive at the expression for N j in the form: N j () = (ß) jcn j j jdj in which 0 dz E L p (0; D pj z) ; (5) D pj = 1 1 = Λ +() j D ; j =1; ; v p v j Λ = 1 v p 1 1 v v ; D = 1 v 1 1 v : (6) The symbol E p (0;t) denotes the positive frequency part of the envelope of the pump-eld amplitude at the output plane of the crystal; CN j is a constant [CN j = p ßC ψ e j (ν j = 0)]. Because photons are R in the nonlinear R process 1 generated in pairs, it holds that dn 1 1() = dn (). If we consider the case in which D pj L char, where char isacharacteristic time of the change of pump-eld intensity, then, according to Eq. (5), the time dependence of N j () resembles that of the pump eld. This means that one-photon multimode Fock-state elds with a given mean-photon-number time dependence can be generated if the pump-eld intensity is suitably chosen (see Fig. in Subsec. 5.1). The spectrum S j of down-converted eld j dened as S j (ν j )=hψ () (0;t 0 )je Λ j(ν j )^a y j (ν j)e j (ν j )^a j (ν j )jψ () (0;t 0 )i (7) can be obtained in terms of the pump-pulse spectrum: S j (ν j )=jcsj(ν j )j dν p E p (0;ν p ) L sinc» L (D p 3 jν p Dν j ) ; (8) 3 One-photon characteristics The mean number of photons N j in down-converted eld j is dened as: where N j () =hψ () (0;t 0 )j ^E j (z j ;t j )= X ν j e j (ν j )^a j (ν j ) ( ) ^E j (0;t 0 + ) ^E j (0;t 0 + )jψ () (0;t 0 )i; (3) exp[ik v j (!0 j + ν j)z j i(! 0 j + ν j)t j ]: (4) The symbol e j (ν j ) denotes the amplitude per photon of the mode with the frequency! j 0 + ν j; kj v means a wave vector in vacuum in the jth eld. Substituting Eqs. () where E p (0;ν p )= 1 1 dt E p (0;t) exp(iν p t); (9) ß sinc(x) = sin(x)=x, and CS j (ν j )= C ψ e j (ν j ). According to Eq. (8), the spectrum of a down-converted eld is obtained as a convolution of the pump-pulse spectrum with a function (sinc )characterizing phase-matching of the interacting elds in the nonlinear crystal. Oscillations in the spectrum S j (ν j ) occur for longer crystals if the pump-eld spectrum je p (0;ν p )j has a peaked structure (for an example, see Fig. 3 in Subsec. 5.1). The higher the numberof peaks in the pump-eld spectrum is the smaller the amplitude and period of the oscillations are. For shorter crystals the sinc function in Eq. (8) is wide and smooths out the peak structure of the pump-pulse spectrum je p (0;ν p )j. This results in a suppression of oscillations in the spectrum S j (ν j ).

3 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds 3 Eq. (8) can be inverted and the pump-eld spectrum E p (0;ν p ) may be determined from the spectrum S j. This is useful for the generation of a down-converted eld (in multimode Fock state) with a required spectrum, because the inverse formula to that in Eq. (8) provides a suitable prole of the pump-eld spectrum. If jd p1 j jd p j, the spectrum S 1 can be expressed in terms of the spectrum S as follows (jcs j (ν j )j cs j is assumed to be frequency independent for j =1; ): S 1 (ν 1 )= c S 1 cs where d = D p =D p1 and p x;y (ν) = 1 ßy dν p jdjl;d (ν 1 ν )S ν d x 0 ; (10) dt x jtj cos(νt): (11) x yjtj The relation in Eq. (10) between the spectra of the downconverted elds is rather general and holds for an arbitrary pump eld. This relation is a consequence of entanglement of photons emerging during their generation. It shows how photons in modes of the down-converted elds are correlated. Because the function p(ν) has a peak around ν =0 and goes to zero for larger values of ν, the mode with a given ν 1 has the strongest correlation with the mode of frequency ν = ν 1 =d [see Eq. (10)]. It is worth to note that for d <0 the strongest correlation occurs between modes at the same sides of the spectra. 4 Two-photon characteristics Two-photon properties of down-converted elds determine results in coincidence-count measurements. Such measurements are conveniently described in terms of a two-photon amplitude A 1 dened as follows: A 1 ( 1 ; )=hvacj ^E 1 (0;t ) ^E (0;t 0 + )jψ () (0;t 0 )i: (1) Using the state jψ () (0;t 0 )i given in Eq. (), we arrive at the expression (! 1 0 =! 0 is assumed): 1 A 1 (T 0 ;)=CA jdj exp( i!0 1 T 0)rect DL E p 0; Λ D + T 0 ; (13) = 1 and T 0 =( 1 + )=. The symbol rect means the rectangular function (rect(x) = 1 for 0 < x < 1, rect(x) = 0 otherwise); CA =ße 1 (ν 1 =0)e (ν =0)C ψ. We further consider one of typical interferometric congurations, the polarization analog of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer (see Fig. 1). Assuming type-ii parametric down-conversion, two mutually perpendicularly polarized photons occur at the output plane of the crystal. They propagate through a birefringent material of a variable length l and then hit a 50/50 % beamsplitter. The! p - NLC! 1! delay line - l - A A F A BS A B F B - - DB? D A - çç? C çç Fig. 1. Sketch of the system for coincidence-count measurement: pump pulse at the frequency! p generates in the nonlinear crystal NLC down-converted photons at the frequencies! 1 and!. They propagate through a delay line of the length l and are detected at the detectors D A and D B; BS denotes a beamsplitter, A A and A B are analyzers, F A and F B are frequency lters, and C means a coincidence device. coincidence-count rate R c is then given by the number of simultaneously detected photons at both detectors D A and D B in a given time interval. Analyzers rotated by 45 degrees with respect to ordinary and extraordinary polarization directions of the nonlinear crystal enable quantum interference between two paths leading to a coincidence count; either a photon from eld 1 is detected by the detector D A and a photon from eld by the detector D B or vice versa. The normalized coincidence-count rate R n in this setting can be expressed as follows [14]: where and ρ(l) = 1 R 0 R 0 = 1 R n (l) =1 ρ(l); (14) dt A dt B Re»A 1 A Λ 1 dt A t A l g 1 ;t B l t B l g 1 ;t A l g g (15) dt B ja 1 (t A ;t B )j : (16) The symbol Re means real part; l is the length of a birefringent optical material (compare Fig. 1) with the group velocities g 1 and g appropriate for the down-converted elds 1 and, respectively. Using the expression for A 1 in Eq. (13), we get (D >0 is assumed): ρ(l) = jc Aj DL= j lj R 0 D d Re ρ R 0 = jc Aj D E p DL=+j lj 0; Λ D + T 0 DL d 0 dt 0 E ( ) p dt 0 E p 0; Λ D + T 0 0; Λ D + T 0 ff ; (17) ;

4 4 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds where l = l DL= and l = (18) 1 g 1 g 1 l: (19) The analysis of the interference term ρ(l) in Eq. (17) for an arbitrary pump eld shows, that ρ(l) is nonzero only in the interval 0» l» DL. The interference pattern has the shape of a dip of the width DL. The change of envelope of the pump eld leads only to a small modication of this shape. On the other hand internal structure of the pump eld may result in the occurrence of peaks at the bottom of the dip (for an example, see Fig. 4 in Subsec. 5.). This behaviour follows if we consider the general relation Fig.. Mean number of photons N between the shape of the two-photon amplitude and the 1() of the signal eld; 1 = 1 10 prole of the interference pattern (for details, see [14]) for 3 s, =0: s, a 1 =0,a = 10, ο 1 = ο =1, L =0:05 mm, f = 0 rad, =0s,jC the two-photon amplitude A 1 (T 0 ;) given in Eq. (13). N1 j =1m. In Figs. 9, values of the inverse group velocities appropriate for the BBO Both one- and two-photon characteristics depend strongly on the internal structure of the pump-pulse spectrum. p = 413 nm and at the down-conversion wavelengths 1 = crystal [18] with type-ii interaction at the pump wavelength In experiment pump-pulse spectra with interesting internal structures can be obtained, e.g., if we add spectra 56: s/mm, and 1=v =54: s/mm. The = 86 nm apply: 1=v p = 56: s/mm, 1=v 1 = of several mutually coherent ultrashort pulses [17]. The optical material for the delay line is assumed to be quartz, for pulses can be mutually delayed and have in general different widths and phase modulations of their spectra. We s/mm. which 1=g 1 =51: s/mm and 1=g =51: further pay attention to the case when the pump eld is composed of two ultrashort pulses. 5 Effects of the internal structure of the pump-pulse spectrum We assume that the pump eld consists of two mutually delayed pulses with the amplitudes E p1 and E p : E p (0;t)=E (0;t) + exp(if)e (0;t+ #); (0) p1 where # denotes a mutual delay between the pulses and f stands for a relative phase of the pulses. Pulses with Gaussian envelopes [17] are used in numerical calculations: ψ! E pj (0;t)=ο j exp 1+ia j j t ; j =1; : (1) The symbol ο j denotes the amplitude of the jth pulse with duration j and chirp parameter a j. The spectrum E pj (0;ν j) determined according to the denition in Eq. (9) is obtained in the form: E pj (0;ν j)=ο j j p ß p 1+ia j exp 5.1 One-photon characteristics p ψ j 4(1 + ia j ) ν j! j =1; : () For short crystals the time dependence of the mean number of photons N j (t) inmodej resembles that of the pump ; Fig. 3. Spectrum S 1(ν 1) of the signal eld for various values of the delay #; # = 0 s (solid curve without symbols), # = s(λ), # = s(π), and # = s (4); 1 = = s, a 1 = a = 0, ο 1 = ο = 1, L = 10 mm, f = 0 rad, and jc S1 j =1m. eld (see Sec. 3). So, e.g., if the pump eld consists of two femtosecond pulses of the same duration and one has no chirp whereas the other one is highly chirped, the overall pump eld as well as N j (t) has a peaked structure (see Fig. ). Oscillations occur in one-photon spectra S 1 and S, see Fig. 3 for the signal spectrum S 1. The period as well as the amplitude of these oscillations decrease with increasing values of the delay # as it has been discussed in Sec. 3. A nonzero delay # causes oscillations in the pump-eld spectrum je p (0;ν p )j which are transferred

5 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds 5 through the phase-matching function [sinc in Eq. (8)] into the spectra of the down-converted elds. These oscillations are well pronounced for longer crystals. If the pump pulses are in phase (f = 0 rad), there is maximum in the center of the spectrum. There occurs a local minimum in the center of the spectrum providing that the pump pulses are out of phase. Alternatively we may consider the overall down-converted eld to be composed of two contributions from two down-conversion processes (pumped by two pump pulses) and then the origin of the oscillations lies in a coherent summation of these contributions in each frequency mode. A suitable choice of the pump-eld characteristics may provide down-converted elds with required one-photon properties. Down-converted elds with given properties can also be obtained by passive methods", e.g., by frequency ltering of elds already generated in parametric process. However, entanglement of photons between two down-converted elds is partially disturbed in this case. Fig. 4. Interference pattern in the normalized coincidencecount rate R n( l) shows three dips; 1 = s, = 0: s, a 1 = a =0,ο 1 =1,ο =1:5, L =1:5 mm, f = ß rad, and jc Aj =10m. 5. Two-photon characteristics The formulas for the quantities ρ (17) and R 0 (18) can be recast into the following form if the pump eld given in Eq. (0) is taken into account: ρ(l; #; f) =ρ 1 (l)+ρ (l; #; f); (3) ρ 1 (l) = jc Aj DL= j lj R 0 D d Re E ( ) pj 8 < X : DL=+j lj j=1; E pj 0; Λ D + T 0 ρ (l; #; f) = jc Aj DL= j lj R 0 D d Re ρ E ( ) p DL=+j lj exp( if)e p1 dt 0 0; Λ D + T 0 ff 0; Λ D + T 0 + # ; (4) dt 0 0; Λ D + T 0 ff ; (5) R 0 (#; f) =R 01 + R 0 (#; f); (6) R 01 = jc Aj L jdj R 0 (#; f) = jc Aj L jdj dt 0 4 X j=1; dt 0 Re E ( ) p (0;T 0 + #) o E pj (0;T 0) 3 5 ;(7) n exp( if)e p1 (0;T 0) : (8) The expressions for ρ 1, ρ, R 01, and R 0 for Gaussian pump pulses are contained in Appendix. We demonstrate the general conclusions given in Sec. 4 considering two Gaussian pump pulses of different time durations and being out of phase. The overall pump eld Fig. 5. Probability of a coincidence count R 0 as a function of the delay #; 1 = = s, a 1 = a =0,ο 1 = ο =1, L =1:5 mm, f = 0 rad, and jc Aj =10m. then has positivevalues at the edges and is negative in the center and so the corresponding fourth-order interference pattern consists of three dips (see Fig. 4). 5.3 Interference of two entangled two-photon elds Physically interesting case occurs if the overall pump eld consists of two partially overlapping ultrashort pulses. Then the overall down-converted eld can be considered as composed of two partially overlapping two-photon elds [see the expression for A 1 in Eq. (13)]. The two two-photon elds are mutually coherent and interfere. In the following we study the fourth-order interference of these elds in detail. Fourth-order interference influences coincidence-count probability. This probability is linearly proportional to the quantity R 0 (#; f) which is shown in Fig. 5 as a function of the mutual delay # of the pump pulses in case when two pump pulses are in phase (f = 0 rad). The coincidence-count probability decreases with increasing #

6 6 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds Fig. 6. Visibility V [V =(R n;max R n;min)=(r n;max+r n;min)] as a function of the delay #; values of the parameters are the same as in Fig. 5. Fig. 7. Interference pattern in the normalized coincidencecount rate R n( l) for various phases f: f = ß rad (solid curve without symbols) and f = 0 rad (solid curve with Λ); # = : s; values of the other parameters are the same as in Fig. 5. and is twice for completely overlapping entangled twophoton elds (# = 0 s) than in the case where there is no overlap (#!1s). This dependence reflects constructive interference between two entangled two-photon elds having its origin in the mutual coherence of the pump pulses. The fourth-order interference pattern in the polarization analog of the Hong-Ou-Mandel interferometer behaves as follows. The visibility V of the coincidence-count pattern (coincidence-count dip [1]) as a function of the delay # is shown in Fig. 6. For # = 0 s the entangled two-photon elds completely overlap, so in fact, there is only one entangled two-photon eld with a given visibility. As the delay # increases, two entangled two-photon elds are gradually formed at the output plane of the crystal. When the delay # increases, the overlap of the two entangled two-photon elds becomes smaller and higher values of the visibility V occur. This means that distinguishability of the signal and idler photons decreases with increasing # because the higher the visibility the higher the distinguishability of the signal and idler photons [11]. For greater values of # the visibility V decreases. When the pump pulses are delayed so much that they do not overlap there are two non-overlapping down-converted elds and the visibility is back to the value appropriate for # =0s. The increase of the visibility V caused by partially overlapped entangled two-photon elds might be useful in various multiparticle experiments for which high visibilities are required. When the distinguishability of the signal and idler photons is minimum(v is maximum), we can already distinguish two entangled two-photon elds in the signaleld mean photon number N 1 (t). We note that the value of the delay # for which two entangled two-photon elds in a down-converted beam can be distinguished differs for the signal and idler elds as a consequence of different group velocities in the nonlinear crystal. The relative phase f influences the shape of coincidencecount pattern. There might occur a peak at the bottom of the dip if the pump pulses are not in phase (f 6= 0 rad, see Fig. 7). This then results in a loss of visibility. The reason is that if the pump pulses are not in phase the Fig. 8. Visibility V as a function of the relative phase f; # = : s, values of the other parameters are the same as in Fig. 5. overall two-photon amplitude A 1 (T 0 ;) gets phase modulation along T 0 [compare the expression for A 1 in Eq. (13)] which then results in the loss of visibility (for a relation between the shapes of the two-photon amplitude A 1 and the coincidence-count pattern described by R n, see [14]).Atypical dependence of the visibility V as a function of f is depicted in Fig. 8. The value of the delay # max for which there is a maximum visibility of coincidence-count pattern increases with the increasing pump pulse duration 0 (we assume 1 = = 0 ). This is demonstrated in Fig. 9. The value of # max is influenced also by pump-pulse chirp. The higher the chirp the lower the value of # max.however, nonzero chirp also results in the loss of visibility [14] because it leads to a phase modulation of the two-photon amplitude A 1. Using this fact, the influence of chirp can be eliminated from the measured visibilities and the pump-pulse duration 0 may be in principle determined from the measured value of # max.

7 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds 7 A Coincidence-count interference pattern for two Gaussian pump pulses The quantities ρ 1 in Eq. (4), ρ in Eq. (5), R 01 in Eq. (7), and R 0 in Eq. (8) can be expressed in the following forms when Gaussian pump pulses are considered: Fig. 9. Delay # max corresponding to the maximum of the visibility V (#) as a function of the pump pulse duration 0 ( 0 = 1 = ); a 1 = a =0,ο 1 = ο =1, L =1:5 mm, f = 0 rad, and jc Aj =10m. 6 Conclusions We have studied both one- and two-photon properties of entangled two-photon elds generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion pumped by elds with arbitrary characteristics. The spectrum of a down-converted eld may be expressed as a convolution of the pump-eld spectrum with the function originating in phase-matching of waves in a nonlinear crystal. The spectra of the downconverted elds are mutually strongly correlated and a general relation between them independent of the pumpeld parameters has been established. Both one- and twophoton properties depend strongly on the internal structure of the pump eld. For example, there may occur oscillations in the spectrum of a down-converted eld. Onephoton multimode Fock-state elds with dened characteristics (intensity or spectrum prole) can be generated if the pump-eld parameters are suitably chosen. For more complex pump elds a typical dip in the coincidence-count interference pattern of the polarization analog of the Hong- Ou-Mandel interferometer is replaced by more complex patterns which may be composed, e.g., of two or three dips. Properties of two (partially) overlapping entangled twophoton elds have been also investigated in detail. It has been shown that two entangled two-photon elds are mutually coherent if the corresponding pump pulses are coherent. Partial overlap of two entangled two-photon pulsed elds leads to higher values of the visibility of coincidencecount interference pattern in comparison with those appropriate for one entangled two-photon eld. This may be conveniently used in many multiparticle experiments for which high values of visibilities are required. The author thanks for a kind hospitality in Quantum Imaging Laboratory at Boston University. He also thanks J. Pe»rina for reading the manuscript. He acknowledges support from Grant No. VS9608 of the Czech Ministry of Education and Grant No of the Czech Home Department. p ßjC Aj DL= j lj ρ 1 (l) = p d R 0 D DL=+j lj 8 < " X οj jffj j j Λ j exp D : j=1; DL= j lj d DL=+j lj p ßjC Aj ο 1 ο ρ (l; #; f) = R 0 D ( exp( if) Re p ff1 + ff Λ " exp ff 1ff Λ # ff 1 + ff Λ p ßjC Aj L ο #9 = ; ;(9) ΛD #) ; (30) R 01 = p 1 jdj 1 + ο Λ ; (31) p ( ßjC Aj Lο 1 ο exp( if) R 0 (#; f) = Re p jdj ff1 + ff Λ exp where ff j =(1+ia j )= j References ff ff 1ff Λ ff 1 + ff Λ # ; (3) for j =1;. 1. L. Mandel, E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1995), and references therein.. J. Pe»rina,. Hradil, B. Jur»co, Quantum Optics and Fundamentals of Physics (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994), and references therein. 3. J. Pe»rina, Quantum Statistics of Linear and Nonlinear Optical Phenomena (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991). 4. M. ukowski, A. eilinger, M. A. Horne, A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 487 (1993). 5. J.-W. Pan and A. eilinger, Phys. Rev. A 57, 08 (1998). 6. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, A. eilinger, Nature 390, 575 (1997). 7. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, A. eilinger, Am. J. Phys. 58, 1131 (1990). 8. D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, A. eilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 8, 1345 (1999). 9. J. G. Rarity, P. R. Tapster, Phys. Rev. A 59, R35 (1999). 10. T. E. Keller, M. H. Rubin, Phys. Rev. A 56, 1534 (1997). 11. G. Di Guiseppe. L. Haiberger, F. De Martini, A. V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 56, R1 (1997). 1. W. P. Grice, I. A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A 56, 167 (1997). 13. W. P. Grice, R. Erdmann, I. A. Walmsley, D. Branning, Phys. Rev. A 57, R87 (1998).

8 8 Jan Pe»rina Jr.: Properties of pulsed entangled two-photon elds 14. J. Pe»rina, Jr., A. V. Sergienko, B. M. Jost, B. E. A. Saleh, M. C. Teich, Phys. Rev. A 59, 359 (1999). 15. T. E. Keller, M. H. Rubin, Y. Shih, Phys. Lett. A 44, 507 (1998). 16. A. Ber»zanskis, K.-H. Feller, A. Stabinis, Opt. Commun. 155, 155 (1998). 17. J.-C. Diels, W. Rudolph, Ultrashort Laser Pulse Phenomena (Academic Press, San Diego, 1996). 18. V. G. Dmitriev, G. G. Gurzadyan, D. N. Nikogosyan, Handbook of Nonlinear Optical Crystals (Springer, Berlin, 1997).