HYDRAULIC systems are favored in industry requiring
|
|
- Hugo Ashley Wright
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 6, NO. 4, AUGUST Integrated Direct/Indirect Adaptive Robust Control of Hydraulic Manipulators With Valve Deadband Amit Mohanty, Student Member, IEEE, andbinyao, Senior Member, IEEE Abstract In this paper, an integrated direct indirect adaptive robust control (DIARC) algorithm is proposed for an electrohydraulic manipulator with unknown valve deadband to improve the achievable output-tracking performance. The controller design for such a system is nontrivial due to various factors, such as nonsmooth static and Coulomb friction model uncertainties arising from the use of a simplified proportional-flow-valve model, and other unknown disturbances present in the system. Furthermore, when an unknown input-valve deadband is present, the controller performance can deteriorate if it is not taken care of explicitly. This paper recognizes the fact that though unknown valve deadband nonlinearity is not globally linearly parameterizable, it can still be linearly parameterized during most of the working ranges. Hence, by using an indirect estimation algorithm with online condition monitoring, accurate estimates of the unknown deadband parameters are obtained for an improved control performance. Comparative experimental results for motion control of an electrohydraulic manipulator with two different valves having deadband illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Index Terms Adaptive control, electro-hydraulic system, motion control, robust control. I. INTRODUCTION HYDRAULIC systems are favored in industry requiring large actuation force [] [4]. In [5], the direct-adaptive robust-control (DARC) technique proposed in [6] was applied for precision-motion control of an electro-hydraulic manipulator. However, being a tuning function-based Lyapunov design, it does not provide the freedom to choose parameter estimation law independent of controller design. The usual gradient-type of parameter estimation law, as used in the DARC design, may not have good convergence properties as the indirect estimation laws (e.g., the least-squares method). In [7], an indirect adaptive robust controller (IARC) design was proposed to overcome the poor parameter-estimation property of the DARC algorithm. The modular design in the IARC algorithm allowed the use of Manuscript received June 7, 2009; revised September 7, 2009; accepted October 9, Date of publication July, 200; date of current version May, 20. Recommended by Technical Editor N. Chaillet. This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant CMS A. Mohanty is with the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA ( amitmohanty@gmail.com). B. Yao is with the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN USA, and also a Chang Jiang Chair Professor at the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power Transmission and Control, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 30027, China ( byao@purdue.edu). Color versions of one or more of the figures in this paper are available online at Digital Object Identifier 0.09/TMECH least-squares type of estimation law to have better parameterconvergence properties and accuracies. It also achieved a complete separation of controller and estimator designs. The outputtracking performance was guaranteed by use of a robust-control law, which was independent of the parameter estimation module. Hence, when the driving signal is not persistently exciting (PE), the estimator module could be turned off without affecting the stability of the overall closed-loop system. This switching of adaptation algorithm ensures that the good parameter estimates obtained by PE signals are not corrupted by non-pe signals. The better estimation properties of such an algorithm was effectively demonstrated in [8]. To overcome the lack of fast-integration-type-model compensation in IARC design, an integrated direct indirect adaptive robust control (DIARC) approach was proposed for a class of single-input single-output (SISO) uncertain nonlinear systems transformable to semistrict parametric feedback form [9], and it has been applied for the control of linear motors [0] and parallel manipulators driven by pneumatic muscles []. In this paper, such an integrated ARC-design framework will be employed for the precision-motion control of an electro-hydraulic robotic arm driven by single-rod hydraulic actuators with valve deadband. In addition to various unmatched model uncertainties considered in [8], this paper also explicitly takes into account the effect of unknown valve deadband. During the past decade, various researchers have tried to solve this problem by estimating the deadband parameters using direct adaptive control algorithms [2], [3]. As pointed out in [4], the unknown deadband nonlinearity cannot be linearly parameterized globally. As such, when direct adaptive control approach is used, it becomes impossible to accurately estimate the deadband parameters even when persistent exciting conditions are satisfied. Departing from these direct estimation laws, this paper will employ indirect estimation design with explicit condition monitoring of signal excitations in the proposed modified DIARC algorithm. The proposed controller design fully utilizes the fact that even though unknown deadband nonlinearity cannot be globally linearly parameterized, it can be linearly parameterized during most of the working range. This approach ensures complete adaptive compensation in the presence of parametric uncertainty only and, thus, is able to achieve asymptotic-output tracking or zero steady-state tracking errors. II. DYNAMIC MODEL AND PROBLEM FORMULATION In this paper, we consider a 3 DOF hydraulic robot arm shown in Fig.. For clarity of presentation, only the swing-joint motion is considered while the other two joints (boom and stick) are kept fixed /$ IEEE
2 708 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 6, NO. 4, AUGUST 20 Fig.. 3 DOF hydraulic manipulator. A. Manipulator Dynamics AsshowninFig.,x s (q) represents the cylinder displacement and q is the angular displacement of the swing arm. P and P 2 are the pressures in the cylinder forward and return chamber, respectively, A and A 2 are the RAM areas of the forward and return chambers, respectively. The applied torque on the swing arm can be written as μ(p A P 2 A 2 ), where μ(q) = x s / q is the first-order partial derivative of cylinder displacement x s with respect to the swing angle q.letb be the combined-damping and viscous-friction coefficient, A be the magnitude of modeled Coulomb friction force, and (D n + D ) be the lumped-modeling error including external disturbances and terms like the unmodeled-friction forces and D n be its nominal value. As shown in [8], the dynamics of the swing motion can be described by () J q = μ(p A P 2 A 2 ) B q AS( q)+d n + D () where J is the moment of inertia of the robotic arm and external payload and S( ) represents a smooth approximation of signum function. B. Pressure Dynamics As shown in Fig., and are the total volumes of the forward and return chambers, respectively, and Q and Q 2 are the supply-flow rate to the forward chamber and return-flow rate of the return chamber, respectively. Let β e be the effective-bulk modulus of hydraulic liquid. The pressure dynamics in both the chambers can be written as [5] (q)β e P = μa q + Q +(D 2n + D 2 ) (2) (q)β e P 2 =+μa 2 q Q 2 (D 22n + D 22 ) (3) where (D 2n + D 2 ) and (D 22n + D 22 ) are the modeling errors associated with forward and return chamber flows, respectively. These uncertainties can be attributed to the nonexact proportional nature of hydraulic valves and the presence of leakages in the hydraulic circuit. D 2n and D 22n are the nominal values of the uncertainties, and D 2 and D 22 are the deviations from the nominal values. C. Deadband and Flow Characteristics Two different valves will be used in the experiments conducted in this paper. One is a servo valve and another one is a Fig. 2. Deadband and inverse deadband functions. (a) Deadband. (b) Inverse deadband. proportional-directional-control (PDC) valve, which has a quite large deadband due to the closed-centered valve configuration. The servo valve has no deadband, so an artificial deadband would be introduced during the experiment while using servocontrol valve. Ignoring the relatively much faster valve dynamics, the actual orifice opening x n due to the spool movement can be modeled as a static mapping of control-voltage command to the valve x v with deadband. Without loss of generality, we assume the slope of the static map beyond deadband region to be unity and any nonunity gain between x n and x v can be taken care of by flow constants k q and k q2, which will be defined later in (7) and (8). As shown in Fig. 2(a), x v x + n, if x v x + n x n = D(x v )= 0, if x n x v x + n x v + x n, if x v x n where x n and x + n are the deadband widths for the positive and negative spool displacements, respectively. Let us define two-set indicator functions as follows: { {, if 0, if 0 ℵ + ( ) =, ℵ ( ) = 0, else 0, else. (5) Using the set-indicator functions ℵ + ( ) and ℵ ( ), the inverse deadband function can be written as follows: (4) x v = ID(x n )=x n + x + n ℵ + (x n )+x n ℵ (x n ). (6) Assuming proportional-flow characteristics of the valves, we can write the supply flow Q and return flow Q 2 as [5] { Ps P, x n 0 Q = k q ΔP x n, ΔP = P P ref, x n < 0 { P2 P ref, x n 0 Q 2 = k q2 ΔP2 x n, ΔP 2 = P s P 2, x n < 0 where k q and k q2 are the flow-gain coefficients, P s and P ref are the supply and tank reference pressures, respectively. (7) (8)
3 MOHANTY AND YAO: INTEGRATED DIRECT/INDIRECT ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC MANIPULATORS 709 In general, the considered system is subjected to parametric uncertainties due to the variations of J, B, A, D n, D 2n, D 22n, β e, x + n, and x n. Define a set of the parameters as: θ = J, θ 2 = B, θ 3 = A, θ 4 = D n, θ 5 = βe, θ 6 = x + n, θ 7 = x n, θ 8 = D 2n, and θ 9 = D 22n. Define a set of state variables as x =[x x 2 x 3 x 4 ] T =[q q P A P 2 A 2 ] T. Using these state variables, the system described by () (3), (7), and (8) can be expressed as x = x 2 (9) θ ẋ 2 = μ(x 3 x 4 ) θ 2 x 2 θ 3 S(x 2 )+θ 4 + D (0) θ 5 ẋ 3 = A2 μx 2 + g A x n + θ 8 A + D 2 A () θ 5 ẋ 4 =+ A2 2 μx 2 g 2 A 2 x n θ 9 A 2 D 22 A 2 (2) where g and g 2 are two variables introduced for the convenience of notation g = k q ΔP, g 2 = k q2 ΔP2. (3) Given the desired motion trajectory q d (t) with bounded derivatives up to the third order, the control objective is ) to synthesize a control input x v such that the output q tracks q d as closely as possible in spite of various model uncertainties and disturbances and 2) to design a parameter-estimation algorithm such that accurate parameter estimates are obtained. III. INTEGRATED-DIRECT/INDIRECT-ADAPTIVE ROBUST-CONTROLLER DESIGN A. Assumptions and Notations The following nomenclature is used throughout this paper: is used to denote the estimate of, is used to denote the estimation error of, e.g., θ = θ θ. Since the extents of the parametric uncertainties and uncertain nonlinearities are normally known, the following practical assumptions are made. Assumption : The unknown parameter vector θ lies within a known bounded-convex set Ω θ. Without loss of generality, it is assumed that θ Ω θ, θ imin θ i θ imax, i =,...,9, where θ imin and θ imax are some known constants, respectively. Assumption 2: All the uncertain nonlinearities are bounded, i.e., D i Ω d = { D : D δi,i=, 2, 22}, where δ i (t) is a known bounded function. Assumption 3: The actual valve-orifice opening x n is not measured. B. Projection-Type Adaptation Law With Rate Limits One of the key elements of the DIARC design is to use the practical available a prior information to construct the projection-type adaptation law for a controlled learning process. For this purpose, we define the following projection mapping Projˆθ( ) [6], [6]: ζ, θ Ωθ or n Ṱ ζ 0 θ Projˆθ(ζ) ( = I Γ nˆθn ) Ṱ θ n Ṱ ζ, θ Ωθ & n Ṱ ζ>0 θ Γnˆθ θ (4) where ζ R p and Γ(t) R p p are any time-varying positive definite-symmetric matrix, Ω θ and Ω θ denote the interior and the boundary of Ω θ, respectively, and nˆθ represents the outward unit normal vector at θ Ω θ. We also define the following saturation function sat θm ( ), ζ θ M sat θm (ζ) =s 0 ζ, s 0 = θ M ζ, ζ > θ M. (5) Lemma ([7], [9]): Suppose that the parameter estimate θ is updated using the following parameter estimator structure: ( θ =sat θm Proj θ (Γτ) ), θ(0) Ωθ (6) where Γ=Γ T > 0 is the adaptive-rate matrix and τ is the adaptation function (both of them to be designed later). With this adaptation-law structure, the following desirable properties hold: P: The parameter estimates are always within the known bounded set Ω θ, i.e., θ(t) Ω θ, t. Thus, from Assumption, θ imin θ i (t) θ imax, i =,...,9 t. P2: θ ( T Γ Proj θ(γτ) τ ) 0 τ. P3: The parameter update rate θ is uniformly bounded by θ(t) θm t. C. DIARC-Control Law As pointed out in Lemma, with the use of projection-type adaptation law with rate limit (6), the parameter estimates and their derivatives are bounded with known bounds, regardless of how the actual estimation function τ and adaptation-rate matrix Γ are designed. In this section, this property will be utilized to synthesize a robust-control law for the system (9) (2) that achieves a guaranteed transient and final tracking error independent of the parameter-estimator design. As the system (9) (2) has unmatched model uncertainties, back-stepping design [7] is used as follows: Step : Define a variable z 2 as z 2 = z + k z = x 2 x 2eq, x 2eq =ẋd k z (7) where z = x q d (t) is the output tracking error and k is any positive feedback gain. Since G s (s) =z (s)/z 2 (s) = /(s + k ) is a stable-transfer function, making z 2 small or converging to zero is equivalent to making z small or converging to zero. Differentiating (7) and noting (0), we obtain θ ż 2 = μ(x 3 x 4 ) θ 2 x 2 θ 3 S(x 2 )+θ 4 θ ẋ 2eq + D. (8)
4 70 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 6, NO. 4, AUGUST 20 Define the actuator load as F L = x 3 x 4. In (8), treating F L as the virtual control, the following virtual DIARC law α 2 for F L is designed α 2 = α 2a + α 2s = α 2a + α 2a2 + α 2s + α 2s2 (9) α 2a = μ [ θ ẋ 2eq + θ 2 x 2 + θ 3 S(x 2 ) θ 4 ] (20) α 2s = μ k 2s z 2,α 2s2 = μ k 2s2 (x,x 2,t)z 2. (2) In (9), α 2a is the usual model compensation with the physical parameter estimates θ, α 2s represents the negative feedback term with gain k 2s > 0 to stabilize the nominal system (i.e., when θ = D =0). Define the input discrepancy z 3 as z 3 = F L α 2 and substituting (9) (2) in (8), the z 2 dynamics can be written as θ ż 2 = μ(α 2s2 + α 2a2 )+μz 3 θ 2 x 2 θ 3 S(x 2 )+ θ 4 θ ẋ 2eq + D. (22) Now, we lump all the uncertainties together and categorize it into a constant or low-frequency component d and a high-frequency component Δ as follows: d + Δ =+ θ ẋ 2eq + θ 2 x 2 + θ 3 S(x 2 ) θ 4 + D. (23) As done in [9], the low-frequency component d can be compensated using α 2a2 as follows: α 2a2 = μ d (24) where d is the estimate of d, which is determined using the following gradient type of estimation law { 0, if d (γ =Proj d z 2 )= d = d M and d (t)z 2 > 0 γ z 2, else (25) where γ > 0, d (0) d M and d M is any preset bound. The nonlinear feedback gain k 2s2 (x,x 2,t) is chosen large enough to satisfy the following inequality: z 2 [μα 2s2 d + Δ ] ε 2 (26) where d = d d and ε 2 > 0 is a design parameter. Remark : One example of k 2s2 so that the robustperformance condition (26) is satisfied, is given by the following: k 2s2 [ θ M ẋ 2eq + θ 2M x 2 + θ 3M S(x 2 ) 4ε 2 + θ 4M + d M + δ ] 2 (27) where θ im = θ imax θ imin. Other smooth or continuous examples of α 2s2 can be found in [6]. Substituting α 2a2 = μ d in (22), we obtain θ ż 2 = k 2s z 2 + μα 2s2 + μz 3 [ d d D ] = k 2s z 2 + μz 3 +(μα 2s2 d + Δ ). (28) Step 2: Let x nd be the control input that stabilizes the system with no deadband. If we knew the actual deadband function D( ), then we can use ID( ) as defined in (6) to find out x v. But, as there is uncertainty in ID( ), the following estimated inverse function would be used: x v = ÎD(x nd)=x nd + θ 6 ℵ + (x nd )+ θ 7 ℵ (x nd ). (29) Substituting (29) in (4), we can write x n = D(x v )=D(ÎD(x nd)) = x nd +Δ d (t) (30) where Δ d (t) is the error due to uncertainty in deadband and is defined as follows: θ 6, x v θ 6 Δ d (t) = x nd, θ 7 <x v <θ 6 (3) θ 7, x v θ 7. From (), (2), and (30), the following z 3 dynamics is obtained: ( ) θ 5 ż 3 = θ 5 F A A 2 A 2 L θ 5 α 2 = θ 8 + θ 9 + A2 2 μx 2 + gx n + gδ d (t) θ 5 α 2c θ 5 α 2u + D 2 (32) where D 2 =( A V D2 + A 2 V D22 2 ), g = g A + g 2 A 2 and α 2c and α 2u represent the calculable and incalculable part of α 2 = α 2c + α 2u as follows: α 2c = α 2 x 2 + α 2 ẋ 2 + α 2 θ + α 2 x x 2 θ t, α 2u = α 2 ẋ 2 x 2 (33) in which ẋ 2 =ẋ 2 ẋ 2 and ẋ 2 represents the estimate of ẋ 2 given by ẋ 2 = θ (μx 3 θ 2 x 2 θ 3 S f (x 2 )+ θ 4 ). (34) With notation u = gx nd, we design the following DIARC control law for u: u = u a + u s = u a + u a2 + u s + u s2 (35) ( A 2 ) u a = + A2 2 μx 2 μz 2 + V θ 5 α 2c θ A 8 2 V θ A 2 9 (36) u s = k 3s z 3,u s2 = k 3s2 (x, t)z 3. (37) In (35), u a is the usual model compensation with the physical parameter estimates θ, u 2s represents the negative feedback term with gain k 3s > 0 to stabilize the nominal system (i.e., when θ = D 2 =0). With (35) (37), we can rewrite (32) as follows: θ 5 ż 3 =(u a2 + u s2 ) μz 2 θ 8 A θ 9 A 2 + gδ d (t) + θ 5 α 2c θ 5 α 2u + D 2. (38) Similar to step, all the uncertainties are lumped together and categorized it into a constant or low-frequency component d 2 and a high-frequency component Δ 2 as follows: d 2 + Δ 2 = θ 5 α 2c θ 5 α 2u A θ8 A 2 θ9 + gδ d + D 2. (39)
5 MOHANTY AND YAO: INTEGRATED DIRECT/INDIRECT ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC MANIPULATORS 7 The low-frequency component d 2 can be compensated using u a2 = d 2, where d 2 is the estimate of d 2. The estimate d 2 is determined by the following gradient type of estimation law: { 0, if d 2 = d 2 = d 2M and d 2 z 3 > 0,γ 2 > 0 (40) γ 2 z 3, else where d 2 (0) d 2M and d 2M are any preset bound. The nonlinear feedback gain k 3s2 is chosen large enough to satisfy the following inequality: z 3 [u s2 d 2 + Δ 2 ] ε 3 (4) where d 2 = d 2 d 2 and ε 3 > 0 is a design parameter. With this control law, the z 3 dynamics can be written as θ 5 ż 3 = k 3s z 2 3 μz 2 +(u s2 d 2 + Δ 2 ) (42) Denoting x nd = g u, the control input x v can be solved from the following nonlinear mapping: x v = g u + θ 6 ℵ + (x nd )+ θ 7 ℵ (x nd ). (43) Theorem (Guaranteed transient performance): Under Assumptions 3, consider the DIARC-control law (43) and ratelimited-adaptation law (6), in which τ and Γ(t) could be any adaptation function and adaptation-rate matrix, respectively. In general, all the signals in the resulting closed-loop system are bounded. Furthermore, the positive definite function V =/2(θ z 2 2 )+/2(θ 5 z 2 3 ), an index for the controller performance is bounded earlier by V (t) e λt V (0) + ε λ [ e λt ] (44) where λ = 2min {k 2s /θ max,k 3s /θ 5max } and ε =(ε 2 + ε 3 ). Proof (Outline): Differentiating V (t) and noting (26), (28), (4), and (42), we can obtain V = θ z 2 ż 2 + θ 5 z 3 ż 3 k 2s z2 2 k 3s z3 2 +[ε 2 + ε 3 ] [ λ 2 θ z2 2 + ] 2 θ 5z3 2 + ε λv + ε (45) which leads to (44) by Comparison Lemma. As θ and θ are guaranteed to be bounded by P and P3 of Lemma, respectively, one can follow standard back-stepping proofs to show that all the control functions (9), (35), (43) and states x are bounded for any desired trajectory q d (t) with bounded third-order derivatives. IV. PARAMETER ESTIMATION In this section, the estimation function τ and the adaptationrate matrix Γ are designed so that an improved final-tracking accuracy asymptotic tracking can be obtained in the presence of parametric uncertainties only (i.e., D = D 2 = D 22 = 0). Before we design any parameter-estimation module, we note the following two difficulties in designing an efficient-parameter estimator for the considered electro-hydraulic system. ) As the measurement of ẋ 2, ẋ 3, and ẋ 4 are not available, we cannot directly estimate the unknown parameters θ from (0) to (2). To overcome this difficulty, we need to resort to X-swapping scheme [7, p. 248]. 2) From (3), we observe that the error due to uncertainty in deadband parameters Δ d (t) cannot be expressed globally linearly with respect to uncertainty in the deadband parameters θ 6 and θ 7. However, for most of the working range (e.g., x v < θ 7 and x v θ 6 ), Δ d (t) is linear w.r.t. θ 6 and θ 7.Although the value of the deadband parameters θ 6 and θ 7 are not known, from Assumption, we know the value of θ 6max and θ 7max. Hence, there exists a known region x v A B = {x v : x v θ 6max or x v θ 7max } where Δ d (t) is linear w.r.t. the parametric uncertainty θ 6 and θ 7. Noting aforementioned facts, the condition x A B is explicitly monitored and the parameters in pressure channel were estimated only when x A B. A. Static-Parametric Model for Manipulator Dynamics Assuming that there is no nonlinear uncertainty (i.e., D =0), the manipulator dynamics (0) can be written as θ ẋ 2 = μf L θ 2 x 2 θ 3 S(x 2 )+θ 4. (46) Let us define the following two filters: = τ + μf L, (0) = 0 (47) Ψ T = τ Ψ T + F (x 2 ) T, Ψ (0) = [x 2 (0) 0 0 0] (48) where F (x 2 ) T =[τ x 2 x 2 S(x 2 ) ] and τ > 0 is the break frequency of the filters defined earlier. Let us define a variable Y =, which is available from (47). Defining ɛ = +(Ψ T Λ )θ 234, Λ =[x ] T, and θ 234 =[θ θ 2 θ 3 θ 4 ] T, we can write Y = (Ψ T Λ )θ ɛ. (49) Differentiating ɛ, we get ε = τ ε. From the initial conditions of the filters (47) and (48), it can be verified that ε (0) = 0. Hence, ε (t) =0 t. Now, we can rewrite (49) as Y = (Ψ T Λ )θ 234. The prediction of Y is defined as Ŷ =(Ψ T Λ ) θ 234. The prediction error ɛ = Ŷ Y can be written as ɛ =(Λ T Ψ T ) θ 234 =Ω T θ 234 (50) where Ω T =(Λ T Ψ T ). Thus, we obtained the staticparametric model (50) that is linear with respect to the parameter-estimation error θ 234. B. Static-Parametric Model for Pressure Dynamics We define the following time intervals during which the estimation process will be done: [t K ji,t K jf]={t : x v (t) K, K {A, B} j N} (5) where N is the set of positive integers and x v (t) enters region K {A, B} at time t = t K ji and leaves it at time t = tk jf.assuming that there is no nonlinear uncertainties (i.e., D 2 =0),
6 72 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 6, NO. 4, AUGUST 20 Fig. 3. Three different regions A = {x v : x v θ 7max }, B = {x v : x v θ 6max }, and C = {x v : θ 7max <x v <θ 6max }. The parameter adaptation is done only when x v A B. the pressure dynamics from () can be written as ( θ 5 P = g x v A ) μ q + θ { 8 g θ 6, if x v B g θ 7, if x v A. (52) Let us define F A2 and F B 2 as F A2 =[τ 2 P, 0, g, V ] T R 4 (53) F B 2 =[τ 2 P, g, 0, V ] T R 4. (54) We define following set of low-pass filters to get a staticparametric model: [ K 2 = τ 2 K 2 + g x v A ] μ q, K 2 (t K V ji)=0 (55) Ψ T K 2 = τ 2 Ψ T K 2 + FK T 2, Ψ T K 2(t K ji)=[p 0 0 0] (56) where K {A, B}. As done in the previous section, let us define a variable Y 2 = 2, its prediction Ŷ2 =(Λ T 2 Ψ T K 2 ) θ 5678 where θ 5678 =[θ 5 θ 6 θ 7 θ 8 ] T and Λ 2 = [P 0 0 0] T. Then, the prediction error ɛ 2 = Ŷ2 Y 2 can be written as follows ɛ 2 =(Λ T 2 Ψ T K 2 ) θ 5678 ɛ 2, where ε 2 = K 2 (Λ T K 2 ΨT K 2 )θ Following a similar procedure as the previous section, it can be shown that ɛ 2 (t) =0and, hence, the prediction error ɛ 2 can be written as ɛ 2 =(Λ T 2 Ψ T K 2) θ 5678 =Ω T 2 θ 5678 (57) where Ω T 2 =(Λ T 2 Ψ T K 2 ). Thus, we obtained the staticparametric model (57) that is linear with respect to the parameter-estimation error θ Following exact similar procedure, we can obtain the static parametric model for P 2 -pressure dynamics as ɛ 22 =Ω T 22 θ (58) With the static-parametric models (50), (57), and (58), the leastsquares estimation algorithm with exponential forgetting factor and covariance resetting [8] is used in this paper. For such an estimation algorithm, the adaptation-rate matrix Γ i is given by Γ i = α i Γ i Γ iω i Ω T i Γ i +ν i Ω T i Γ iω i, Γ i (t + r )=ρ im I,ν 0 (59) where Γ i (0) = Γ T i (0) > 0 and the adaptation function τ i is given by τ i = +ν i Ω T i Γ Ω i ɛ i (60) iω i where i = {, 2, 22}. In (59), α i 0 is the forgetting factor, t r is the covariance resetting time, i.e., the time when λ min (Γ i (t)) = ρ i, where ρ i is a preset lower limit for Γ i (t) satisfying 0 <ρ i <ρ im and ν i 0 is the normalizing factor (see Fig. 3). As previously mentioned in this section, the parameter estimation for pressure channel is conducted only when x A B. Hence, as x v leaves the region A B and enters the region C, the rate of change of adaptation rate matrices Γ 2 and Γ 22 and adaptation function τ 2 and τ 22 are set to zero and thus, leading to θ5 = θ6 = θ7 = θ8 = θ9 =0. Theorem 2: In the presence of parametric uncertainties only (i.e., D = D 2 = D 22 =0), by using the control law (43), and adaptation law (6) with least-squares type adaptation function (60) and adaptation rate matrix (59), if the following PE condition is satisfied for i = {, 2, 22} t+t t Ω i (σ)ω T i (σ)dσ κ i I p, for some κ i,t >0 (6) then, θ 0, i.e., θ converges to its true value θ. Furthermore, along with the robust performance of Theorem, an improved final tracking asymptotic tracking is also obtained, i.e., z,z 2,z 3 0 as t. Proof (Outline): Following standard techniques in adaptive control, it can be shown that if D = D 2 = D 22 =0and the PE condition given by (6) is satisfied, then θ 0, ast and θ L 2 [0, ). Defining a positive definite function as V n = 2 θ z θ 5z γ d + 2 γ 2 d 2, we can write V n = (k 2s + k 2s2 )z2 2 (k 3s + k 3s2 ) z2 2 +[ẋ 2eq θ + x 2 θ2 + S(x 2 ) θ 3 θ 4 ]z 2 + [ θ5 α 2c θ 5 α 2u θ 8 A θ 9 A ] 2 + gδ d (t) z 3 + d γ (Proj d (γ z 2 ) z 2 )+ d 2 γ 2 (Proj d2 (γ 2 z 3 ) z 3 ). (62) Using P2 of Lemma, we see that the last two terms of (62) are less than zero. From (3), it can be verified that Δ d (t) θ 6 ℵ + (x v )+ θ 7 ℵ (x v ). Using aforementioned facts, we rewrite (62) as follows: V n (k 2s + k 2s2 )z2 2 (k 3s + k 3s2 ) z2 2 + ζ (63) where ζ is a term linear with respect to parametric uncertainty θ. Using the fact that θ L 2 [0, ), we assert that ζ L 2 [0, ). Hence, from (63), z 2,z 3 L 2 [0, ). Using Barbalat s Lemma and noticing that z 2 and z 3 are uniformly continuous, we conclude z,z 2,z 3 0 as t.
7 MOHANTY AND YAO: INTEGRATED DIRECT/INDIRECT ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC MANIPULATORS 73 Fig. 4. Desired trajectory for the swing joint. TABLE I PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF IARC AND DIARC: SERVO VALVE Fig. 5. Swing joint-tracking error for the servo valve. V. COMPARATIVE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS The IARC and DIARC controllers were tested for swing joint control for an electro-hydraulic manipulator, while other two joints were kept fixed. The desired trajectory q d (t) is shown in Fig. 4. The initial values of the unknown parameters were kept same for both the controllers. The complete details of experimental test-bed are omitted for brevity and can be found in [8]. Electro-hydraulic system parameters are as follows: P s =7MPa,P ref =MPa, A =3.4 in 2,A 2 =.66 in 2 in 3 k q =0.82 lb/in 2 sv, k in 3 q2 =0.89 lb/in 2 sv β =2.7e8 Pa, θ min = [60, 0, 0, 0, 2e8, 0, 0, 0.000, 0.000] θ max = [250, 00, 00, 00, 4e8, 2, 2, 0.000, 0.000]. Fig. 6. Estimate of θ and θ 2 for the servo valve. A. Servo Valve The servo valve used in this experiment has a bandwidth around 8 9 Hz and a maximum flow rate of 0 gallon/min. As the servo valve possesses no deadband, an artificial deadband of [.5,.5]V was introduced during the experiment. The valve dynamics was neglected in this experiment as it significantly increases the complexities in real-time controller implementation. Therefore, it was necessary to keep the closedloop bandwidth less than the bandwidth of the servo valve. Keeping this limitation in mind, the feedback gains were chosen to be k =0,k 2s + k 2s2 =0, and k 3s + k 3s2 =0 0 8, so that the closed-loop bandwidth of the system was less than the bandwidth of the servo valve. For DIARC controller, the integral gains were set at γ =20and γ 2 = Fig. 5. shows the tracking errors for IARC and DIARC algorithm with both using the servo valve. Table I compares the transient performance and the final tracking error of two algorithms. The following comparative observations were made: Fig. 7. Estimate of θ 3 and θ 4 for the servo valve. ) during the transient, the maximum absolute error for DIARC is about five times less than IARC; 2) during the transient, the mean absolute error for DIARC is about ten times less than IARC; thus a faster rate of error decay is achieved for DIARC algorithm as compared to IARC; and 3) a better final tracking error is achieved for DIARC. Figs. 6 0 show that the better tracking performance of DIARC is achieved without sacrificing the accuracy of estimated parameters. The dotted line in Figs. 8 and 9 are the true values of estimated parameters.
8 74 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 6, NO. 4, AUGUST 20 TABLE II PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF IARC AND DIARC: PDC VALVE Fig. 8. Deadband estimates for the servo valve: θ 6,θ 7. Fig. 2. Estimate of θ and θ 2 for the PDC valve. Fig. 9. Estimate of β e = θ 5 for the servo valve (in Pa). Fig. 3. Estimate of θ 3 and θ 4 for the PDC valve. Fig. 0. Fig.. Estimate of θ 8 and θ 9 for the servo valve. Swing joint-tracking error for PDC valve. B. Proportional-Directional Control Valve Fig. shows the output-tracking performance of both the controller for a PDC valve. The PDC valve used in this experiment has a bandwidth around 5 6 Hz, which is approximately half the bandwidth of the servo valve. Therefore, the feedback gains for IARC and DIARC were set at k = k 2s + k 2s2 =7, k 3s + k 3s2 =7 0 8 for the PDC valve, which are less than the feedback gains used for the servo-control valve. For DIARC controller, the integral gains were set at γ =5and γ 2 =5 0 9, which are less than the integral gains used for the servo valve. The reduced feedback proportional and integral gains caused overall degraded controller performance for PDC valve as compared to the servo valve (for both the controllers). However, comparing the performance of IARC and DIARC algorithm for PDC valve, we observe that by using DIARC algorithm, significant improvement in transient performance and final tracking accuracy is achieved (see Table II). Figs. 2 4
9 MOHANTY AND YAO: INTEGRATED DIRECT/INDIRECT ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF HYDRAULIC MANIPULATORS 75 Fig. 4. Deadband estimates for the PDC valve: θ 6,θ 7. show that the better-tracking performance of DIARC is achieved without sacrificing the accuracy of estimated parameters. VI. CONCLUSION In this paper, DIARC was proposed for high-performancemotion control of an electro-hydraulic systems driven by singlerod actuators with input valve deadband. The proposed controller uses least-squares type indirect parameter adaptation algorithm with certain condition monitoring to estimate accurate deadband parameters. Furthermore, a fast dynamic compensation similar to the DARC design is employed to improve the tracking performance. Experimental results are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. REFERENCES [] E. Papadopoulos, B. Mu, and R. Frenette, On modeling, identification, and control of a heavy-duty electrohydraulic harvester manipulator, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp , Jun [2] C. To, R. Kobetic, J. Schnellenberger, M. Audu, and R. Triolo, Design of a variable constraint hip mechanism for a hybrid neuroprosthesis to restore gait after spinal cord injury, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp , Apr [3] S. Kuchler, T. Mahl, J. Neupert, K. Schneider, and O. Sawodny, Active control for an offshore crane using prediction of the vessel s motion, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, to be published. [4] W. Kemmetmuller, S. Muller, and A. Kugi, Mathematical modeling and nonlinear controller design for a novel electrohydraulic power-steering system, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 2, no., pp , Feb [5] B. Yao, F. Bu, J. T. Reedy, and G. T. Chiu, Adaptive robust control of single-rod hydraulic actuators: Theory and experiments, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, vol. 5, no., pp. 79 9, Mar [6] B. Yao, High performance adaptive robust control of nonlinear systems: A general framework and new schemes, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 997, pp [7] B. Yao and A. Palmer, Indirect adaptive robust control of SISO nonlinear systems in semi-strict feedback forms, presented at the IFAC World Congr., Barcelona, Spain, [8] A. Mohanty and B. Yao, Indirect adaptive robust control of hydraulic manipulators with accurate parameter estimates, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., to be published. [9] B. Yao, Integrated direct/indirect adaptive robust control of SISO nonlinear systems transformable to semi-strict feedback forms, in Proc. American Control Conference, 2003, pp (the O. Hugo Schuck Best Paper (Theory) Award from the American Automatic Control Council in 2004). [0] B. Yao and R. Dontha, Integrated direct/indirect adaptive robust precision control of linear motor drive systems with accurate parameter estimations, in Proc. 2nd IFAC Conf. Mechatro. Syst., 2002, pp [] X. Zhu, G. Tao, B. Yao, and J. Cao, Integrated direct/indirect adaptive robust posture trajectory control of a parallel manipulator driven by pneumatic muscles, IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, pp , May [2] X.-S. Wang, C.-Y. Su, and H. Hong, Robust adaptive control of a class of nonlinear systems with unknown dead-zone, Automatica, vol. 40, pp , [3] S. Ibrir, W. F. Xie, and C. Y. Su, Adaptive tracking of nonlinear systems with non-symmetric dead-zone input, Automatica,vol.43,no.3,pp , [4] C. Hu, B. Yao, and Q. Wang, Integrated direct/indirect adaptive robust control of a class of nonlinear systems preceded by unknown dead-zone nonlinearity, in Proc. 48th IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, Shanghai, China, Dec. 6 8, 2009, pp [5] H. E. Merritt, Hydraulic Control Systems. New York: Wiley, 967. [6] S. Sastry and M. Bodson, Adaptive Control: Stability, Convergence and Robustness. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 989. [7] M. Krstic, I. Kanellakppoulos, and P. V. Kokotovic, Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. New York: Wiley, 995. [8] I. D. Landau, R. Lozano, and M. M Saad, Adaptive Control. NewYork: Springer-Verlag, 998. Amit Mohanty received the B.Tech degree from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India, in 2003, and the M.S. degree from Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, in 2004, both in mechanical engineering. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering in the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. His current research interests include adaptive and robust control of mechatronic systems, nonlinear observer design, fault detection, diagnostics, and adaptive fault-tolerant control. Bin Yao received the B.Eng. degree in applied mechanics from Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, China, in 987, the M.Eng. degree in electrical engineering from Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, in 992, and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of California, Berkeley, in 996. In 996, he joined the School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, where he has been a Professor since Dr. Yao was the recipient of a Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award from the National Science Foundation in 998, a Joint Research Fund for Outstanding Overseas Chinese Young Scholars from the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2005, the O. Hugo Schuck Best Paper (Theory) Award from the American Automatic Control Council in 2004, and the Outstanding Young Investigator Award of ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division (DSCD) in He was honored with the Kuang-piu Professor Award in 2005 and the Chang Jiang Chair Professor in 200 from Zhejiang University, China. He is currently the Chair of the ASME DSCD Mechatronics Technical Committee.
Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Control. Theory and Applications to the Integrated Design of Intelligent and Precision Mechatronic Systems.
A Short Course on Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Control Theory and Applications to the Integrated Design of Intelligent and Precision Mechatronic Systems Bin Yao Intelligent and Precision Control Laboratory
More informationProgrammable Valves: a Solution to Bypass Deadband Problem of Electro-Hydraulic Systems
Programmable Valves: a Solution to Bypass Deadband Problem of Electro-Hydraulic Systems Song Liu and Bin Yao Abstract The closed-center PDC/servo valves have overlapped spools to prevent internal leakage
More information576 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 17, NO. 3, MAY /$ IEEE
576 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 17, NO 3, MAY 2009 Integrated Direct/Indirect Adaptive Robust Posture Trajectory Tracking Control of a Parallel Manipulator Driven by Pneumatic
More information1 Introduction Hydraulic systems have been used in industry in a wide number of applications by virtue of their small size-to-power ratios and the abi
NONLINEAR ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF ONE-DOF ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC SERVO SYSTEMS Λ Bin Yao George T. C. Chiu John T. Reedy School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907 Abstract
More informationAdaptive Robust Motion Control of Single-Rod Hydraulic Actuators: Theory and Experiments
IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 5, NO. 1, MARCH 2000 79 Adaptive Robust Motion Control of Single-Rod Hydraulic Actuators: Theory Experiments Bin Yao, Member, IEEE, Fanping Bu, John Reedy,
More informationALL actuators of physical devices are subject to amplitude
198 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 12, NO. 2, APRIL 2007 A Globally Stable High-Performance Adaptive Robust Control Algorithm With Input Saturation for Precision Motion Control of Linear
More informationPerformance Improvement of Proportional Directional Control Valves: Methods and Experiments
Performance Improvement of Proportional Directional Control Valves: Methods and Experiments Fanping Bu and Bin Yao + School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 4797 + Email:
More informationPRECISION CONTROL OF LINEAR MOTOR DRIVEN HIGH-SPEED/ACCELERATION ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS. Bin Yao
PRECISION CONTROL OF LINEAR MOTOR DRIVEN HIGH-SPEED/ACCELERATION ELECTRO-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS Bin Yao Intelligent and Precision Control Laboratory School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University West
More informationThis article was published in an Elsevier journal. The attached copy is furnished to the author for non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the author s institution, sharing
More informationAdaptive robust control for DC motors with input saturation
Published in IET Control Theory and Applications Received on 0th July 00 Revised on 5th April 0 doi: 0.049/iet-cta.00.045 Adaptive robust control for DC motors with input saturation Z. Li, J. Chen G. Zhang
More informationLyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL VOL. 56 NO. 3 MARCH 2011 655 Lyapunov Stability of Linear Predictor Feedback for Distributed Input Delays Nikolaos Bekiaris-Liberis Miroslav Krstic In this case system
More informationThis article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and
This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
More information1482 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 20, NO. 3, JUNE 2015
482 IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 20, NO. 3, JUNE 205 μ-synthesis-based Adaptive Robust Control of Linear Motor Driven Stages With High- Frequency Dynamics: A Case Study Zheng Chen, Bin
More informationAdaptive Robust Precision Control of Piezoelectric Positioning Stages
Proceedings of the 5 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics Monterey, California, USA, 4-8 July, 5 MB3-3 Adaptive Robust Precision Control of Piezoelectric Positioning
More informationA NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF 3RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS
Copyright 00 IFAC 15th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain A NONLINEAR TRANSFORMATION APPROACH TO GLOBAL ADAPTIVE OUTPUT FEEDBACK CONTROL OF RD-ORDER UNCERTAIN NONLINEAR SYSTEMS Choon-Ki Ahn, Beom-Soo
More informationPERIODIC signals are commonly experienced in industrial
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 15, NO. 2, MARCH 2007 369 Repetitive Learning Control of Nonlinear Continuous-Time Systems Using Quasi-Sliding Mode Xiao-Dong Li, Tommy W. S. Chow,
More informationAdaptive Robust Precision Motion Control of a High-Speed Industrial Gantry With Cogging Force Compensations
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 19, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2011 1149 Adaptive Robust Precision Motion Control of a High-Speed Industrial Gantry With Cogging Force Compensations Bin Yao,
More informationAdaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 3, MAY 2010 723 Adaptive Robust Control for Servo Mechanisms With Partially Unknown States via Dynamic Surface Control Approach Guozhu Zhang,
More informationOVER THE past 20 years, the control of mobile robots has
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 18, NO. 5, SEPTEMBER 2010 1199 A Simple Adaptive Control Approach for Trajectory Tracking of Electrically Driven Nonholonomic Mobile Robots Bong Seok
More informationSolid:Effective mass without load. Dotted:Effective mass with load
Adaptive Robust Precision Motion Control of Single-Rod Hydraulic Actuators with Time-Varying Unknown Inertia: A Case Study Fanping Bu and Bin Yao + Ray W. Herrick Laboratory School of Mechanical Engineering
More informationNonlinear Adaptive Robust Force Control of Hydraulic Load Simulator
Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 5 (01) 766-775 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Chinese Journal of Aeronautics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cja Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Force Control
More informationNonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel
American Control Conference June -. Portland OR USA FrB. Nonlinear Tracking Control of Underactuated Surface Vessel Wenjie Dong and Yi Guo Abstract We consider in this paper the tracking control problem
More informationDESIRED COMPENSATION ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF MOBILE SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH DISTURBANCE AND MODEL UNCERTAINTIES
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 13 ISSN 1349-4198 Volume 9, Number 1, January 13 pp. 153 164 DESIRED COMPENSATION ADAPTIVE ROBUST CONTROL OF
More information458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 3, MAY 2008
458 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL 16, NO 3, MAY 2008 Brief Papers Adaptive Control for Nonlinearly Parameterized Uncertainties in Robot Manipulators N V Q Hung, Member, IEEE, H D
More informationIEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 13, NO. 6, DECEMBER Lu Lu, Zheng Chen, Bin Yao, Member, IEEE, and Qingfeng Wang
IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, VOL. 13, NO. 6, DECEMBER 2008 617 Desired Compensation Adaptive Robust Control of a Linear-Motor-Driven Precision Industrial Gantry With Improved Cogging Force Compensation
More informationCONTROL OF ROBOT CAMERA SYSTEM WITH ACTUATOR S DYNAMICS TO TRACK MOVING OBJECT
Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, V.31, N.3 (2015), 255 265 DOI: 10.15625/1813-9663/31/3/6127 CONTROL OF ROBOT CAMERA SYSTEM WITH ACTUATOR S DYNAMICS TO TRACK MOVING OBJECT NGUYEN TIEN KIEM
More informationNONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD
NONLINEAR CONTROLLER DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS USING THE IMMERSION AND INVARIANCE METHOD Ponesit Santhanapipatkul Watcharapong Khovidhungij Abstract: We present a controller design based on
More informationAdaptive Robust Control of Linear Motor Systems with Dynamic Friction Compensation Using Modified LuGre Model
Proceedings of the 8 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics July - 5, 8, Xi'an, China Adaptive Robust Control of Linear Motor Systems with Dynamic Friction Compensation
More informationTHE control of systems with uncertain nonlinear dynamics
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 2, MARCH 2008 373 Asymptotic Tracking for Systems With Structured and Unstructured Uncertainties P. M. Patre, Student Member, IEEE, W. MacKunis,
More informationA Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for Robotic Manipulators
932 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, VOL. 47, NO. 4, AUGUST 2000 A Nonlinear Disturbance Observer for Robotic Manipulators Wen-Hua Chen, Member, IEEE, Donald J. Ballance, Member, IEEE, Peter
More informationSimulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach
Simulation Study on Pressure Control using Nonlinear Input/Output Linearization Method and Classical PID Approach Ufuk Bakirdogen*, Matthias Liermann** *Institute for Fluid Power Drives and Controls (IFAS),
More informationNonlinear PD Controllers with Gravity Compensation for Robot Manipulators
BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES Volume 4, No Sofia 04 Print ISSN: 3-970; Online ISSN: 34-408 DOI: 0.478/cait-04-00 Nonlinear PD Controllers with Gravity Compensation
More informationDesign of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone
International Journal of Automation and Computing 8), May, -8 DOI:.7/s633--574-4 Design of Observer-based Adaptive Controller for Nonlinear Systems with Unmodeled Dynamics and Actuator Dead-zone Xue-Li
More informationAdaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties
Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 3(1): 308-322, 2009 ISSN 1991-8178 Adaptive Robust Tracking Control of Robot Manipulators in the Task-space under Uncertainties M.R.Soltanpour, M.M.Fateh
More informationAdaptive Robust Control (ARC) for an Altitude Control of a Quadrotor Type UAV Carrying an Unknown Payloads
2 th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems Oct. 26-29, 2 in KINTEX, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Adaptive Robust Control (ARC) for an Altitude Control of a Quadrotor Type UAV Carrying an Unknown
More informationPrediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate
www.scichina.com info.scichina.com www.springerlin.com Prediction-based adaptive control of a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems with nonlinear growth rate WEI Chen & CHEN ZongJi School of Automation
More informationA Design Method of A Robust Controller for Hydraulic Actuation with Disturbance Observers
A Design Method of A Robust Controller for Hydraulic Actuation with Disturbance Observers Hiroaki Kuwahara, Fujio Terai Corporate Manufacturing Engineering Center, TOSHIBA Corporation, Yokohama, Japan
More informationRobust fuzzy control of an active magnetic bearing subject to voltage saturation
University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences 2010 Robust fuzzy control of an active magnetic bearing subject to voltage
More informationAPPLICATION OF ADAPTIVE CONTROLLER TO WATER HYDRAULIC SERVO CYLINDER
APPLICAION OF ADAPIVE CONROLLER O WAER HYDRAULIC SERVO CYLINDER Hidekazu AKAHASHI*, Kazuhisa IO** and Shigeru IKEO** * Division of Science and echnology, Graduate school of SOPHIA University 7- Kioicho,
More informationAdaptive fuzzy observer and robust controller for a 2-DOF robot arm
Adaptive fuzzy observer and robust controller for a -DOF robot arm S. Bindiganavile Nagesh, Zs. Lendek, A.A. Khalate, R. Babuška Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg, 8 CD Delft, The Netherlands (email:
More informationThe Rationale for Second Level Adaptation
The Rationale for Second Level Adaptation Kumpati S. Narendra, Yu Wang and Wei Chen Center for Systems Science, Yale University arxiv:1510.04989v1 [cs.sy] 16 Oct 2015 Abstract Recently, a new approach
More informationControl of Robot. Ioannis Manganas MCE Master Thesis. Aalborg University Department of Energy Technology
Control of Robot Master Thesis Ioannis Manganas MCE4-3 Aalborg University Department of Energy Technology Copyright c Aalborg University 8 LATEXhas been used for typesetting this document, using the TeXstudio
More informationIMECE IMECE ADAPTIVE ROBUST REPETITIVE CONTROL OF PIEZOELECTRIC ACTUATORS
Proceedings Proceedings of IMECE5 of 5 5 ASME 5 ASME International International Mechanical Mechanical Engineering Engineering Congress Congress and Exposition and Exposition November November 5-, 5-,
More informationL -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems
L -Bounded Robust Control of Nonlinear Cascade Systems Shoudong Huang M.R. James Z.P. Jiang August 19, 2004 Accepted by Systems & Control Letters Abstract In this paper, we consider the L -bounded robust
More informationRobust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems
Proceedings of the 26 American Control Conference Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, June 14-16, 26 FrB3.2 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of a Class of Nonminimum Phase Nonlinear Systems Bo Xie and Bin
More informationSensorless Sliding Mode Control of Induction Motor Drives
Sensorless Sliding Mode Control of Induction Motor Drives Kanungo Barada Mohanty Electrical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Rourkela-7698, India E-mail: kbmohanty@nitrkl.ac.in
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial. Miroslav Krstić
Adaptive Nonlinear Control A Tutorial Miroslav Krstić University of California, San Diego Backstepping Tuning Functions Design Modular Design Output Feedback Extensions A Stochastic Example Applications
More informationThe Design of Sliding Mode Controller with Perturbation Estimator Using Observer-Based Fuzzy Adaptive Network
ransactions on Control, utomation and Systems Engineering Vol. 3, No. 2, June, 2001 117 he Design of Sliding Mode Controller with Perturbation Estimator Using Observer-Based Fuzzy daptive Network Min-Kyu
More informationHYDRAULIC LINEAR ACTUATOR VELOCITY CONTROL USING A FEEDFORWARD-PLUS-PID CONTROL
HYDRAULIC LINEAR ACTUATOR VELOCITY CONTROL UING A FEEDFORWARD-PLU-PID CONTROL Qin Zhang Department of Agricultural Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 68 ABTRACT: A practical
More informationA Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems
53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control December 15-17, 2014. Los Angeles, California, USA A Novel Integral-Based Event Triggering Control for Linear Time-Invariant Systems Seyed Hossein Mousavi 1,
More informationAS A POPULAR approach for compensating external
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, VOL. 16, NO. 1, JANUARY 2008 137 A Novel Robust Nonlinear Motion Controller With Disturbance Observer Zi-Jiang Yang, Hiroshi Tsubakihara, Shunshoku Kanae,
More informationADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT
International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, Vol. 12, No. 7 (2002) 1599 1604 c World Scientific Publishing Company ADAPTIVE FEEDBACK LINEARIZING CONTROL OF CHUA S CIRCUIT KEVIN BARONE and SAHJENDRA
More informationObserver-based sampled-data controller of linear system for the wave energy converter
International Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, December 211, pp. 275-279 http://dx.doi.org/1.5391/ijfis.211.11.4.275 Observer-based sampled-data controller of linear system
More informationUDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances
16 American Control Conference ACC) Boston Marriott Copley Place July 6-8, 16. Boston, MA, USA UDE-based Dynamic Surface Control for Strict-feedback Systems with Mismatched Disturbances Jiguo Dai, Beibei
More informationIN recent years, controller design for systems having complex
818 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 29, NO 6, DECEMBER 1999 Adaptive Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Systems by State and Output Feedback S S Ge, Member,
More informationExperimental Design for Identification of Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Uncertainties
1 American Control Conference Marriott Waterfront Baltimore MD USA June 3-July 1 ThC17. Experimental Design for Identification of Nonlinear Systems with Bounded Uncertainties Lu Lu and Bin Yao Abstract
More informationEnergy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion
Energy-based Swing-up of the Acrobot and Time-optimal Motion Ravi N. Banavar Systems and Control Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Mumbai-476, India Email: banavar@ee.iitb.ac.in Telephone:(91)-(22)
More informationCHATTERING REDUCTION OF SLIDING MODE CONTROL BY LOW-PASS FILTERING THE CONTROL SIGNAL
Asian Journal of Control, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 392 398, May 2010 Published online 25 February 2010 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) DOI: 10.1002/asjc.195 CHATTERING REDUCTION OF SLIDING
More informationREPETITIVE LEARNING OF BACKSTEPPING CONTROLLED NONLINEAR ELECTROHYDRAULIC MATERIAL TESTING SYSTEM 1. Seunghyeokk James Lee 2, Tsu-Chin Tsao
REPETITIVE LEARNING OF BACKSTEPPING CONTROLLED NONLINEAR ELECTROHYDRAULIC MATERIAL TESTING SYSTEM Seunghyeokk James Lee, Tsu-Chin Tsao Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department University of California
More informationRobust Control Design for a Wheel Loader Using Mixed Sensitivity H-infinity and Feedback Linearization Based Methods
25 American Control Conference June 8-, 25. Portland, OR, USA FrB2.5 Robust Control Design for a Wheel Loader Using Mixed Sensitivity H-infinity and Feedback Linearization Based Methods Roger Fales and
More informationContraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems
9 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June -, 9 WeB4.5 Contraction Based Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems B. B. Sharma and I. N. Kar, Member IEEE Abstract
More informationIndirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme
Indirect Model Reference Adaptive Control System Based on Dynamic Certainty Equivalence Principle and Recursive Identifier Scheme Itamiya, K. *1, Sawada, M. 2 1 Dept. of Electrical and Electronic Eng.,
More informationReceived 21 April 2008; accepted 6 January 2009
Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences Vol. 16, February 2009, pp. 7-13 Inestigation on the characteristics of a new high frequency three-way proportional pressure reducing ale in ariable ale
More informationAdaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, VOL. 9, NO. 2, APRIL 2001 315 Adaptive Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinearly Parameterized Fuzzy Approximators Hugang Han, Chun-Yi Su, Yury Stepanenko
More informationFINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS 1. Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ
Copyright IFAC 5th Triennial World Congress, Barcelona, Spain FINITE TIME CONTROL FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS Yiguang Hong Λ Yangsheng Xu ΛΛ Jie Huang ΛΛ Λ Institute of Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
More information1 Introduction Almost every physical system is subject to certain degrees of model uncertainties, which makes the design of high performance control a
Observer Based Adaptive Robust Control of a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Dynamic Uncertainties Λ Bin Yao + Li Xu School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA + Tel:
More informationObserver Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems
2014 14th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2014) Oct. 22 25, 2014 in KINTEX, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Observer Based Friction Cancellation in Mechanical Systems Caner Odabaş
More informationAdaptive Tracking and Parameter Estimation with Unknown High-Frequency Control Gains: A Case Study in Strictification
Adaptive Tracking and Parameter Estimation with Unknown High-Frequency Control Gains: A Case Study in Strictification Michael Malisoff, Louisiana State University Joint with Frédéric Mazenc and Marcio
More informationDSCC2012-MOVIC
ASME 5th Annual Dynamic Systems and Control Conference joint with the JSME th Motion and Vibration Conference DSCC-MOVIC October 7-9,, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA DSCC-MOVIC-8784 DISPLACEMENT CONTROL
More informationCascade Controller Including Backstepping for Hydraulic-Mechanical Systems
Proceedings of the 22 IFAC Workshop on Automatic Control in Offshore Oil and Gas Production, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, ay 3 - June, 22 FrBT2.3 Cascade Controller
More informationRobust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers Using Coefficient Diagram Method
International Journal of Electrical Engineering. ISSN 0974-2158 Volume 7, Number 2 (2014), pp. 257-270 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Robust Tuning of Power System Stabilizers
More informationIMECE NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM PHASE LINEAR SYSTEMS
Proceedings of IMECE 27 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition November -5, 27, Seattle, Washington,USA, USA IMECE27-42237 NEW APPROACH OF TRACKING CONTROL FOR A CLASS OF NON-MINIMUM
More informationHover Control for Helicopter Using Neural Network-Based Model Reference Adaptive Controller
Vol.13 No.1, 217 مجلد 13 العدد 217 1 Hover Control for Helicopter Using Neural Network-Based Model Reference Adaptive Controller Abdul-Basset A. Al-Hussein Electrical Engineering Department Basrah University
More informationIEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL. 50, NO. 5, MAY Bo Yang, Student Member, IEEE, and Wei Lin, Senior Member, IEEE (1.
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, VOL 50, NO 5, MAY 2005 619 Robust Output Feedback Stabilization of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems With Uncontrollable and Unobservable Linearization Bo Yang, Student
More informationCOMPARISON OF TWO METHODS TO SOLVE PRESSURES IN SMALL VOLUMES IN REAL-TIME SIMULATION OF A MOBILE DIRECTIONAL CONTROL VALVE
COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS TO SOLVE PRESSURES IN SMALL VOLUMES IN REAL-TIME SIMULATION OF A MOBILE DIRECTIONAL CONTROL VALVE Rafael ÅMAN*, Heikki HANDROOS*, Pasi KORKEALAAKSO** and Asko ROUVINEN** * Laboratory
More informationI. D. Landau, A. Karimi: A Course on Adaptive Control Adaptive Control. Part 9: Adaptive Control with Multiple Models and Switching
I. D. Landau, A. Karimi: A Course on Adaptive Control - 5 1 Adaptive Control Part 9: Adaptive Control with Multiple Models and Switching I. D. Landau, A. Karimi: A Course on Adaptive Control - 5 2 Outline
More informationFault Detection and Diagnosis of an Electrohydrostatic Actuator Using a Novel Interacting Multiple Model Approach
2011 American Control Conference on O'Farrell Street, San Francisco, CA, USA June 29 - July 01, 2011 Fault Detection and Diagnosis of an Electrohydrostatic Actuator Using a Novel Interacting Multiple Model
More informationAnalysis of Offshore Knuckle Boom Crane Part Two: Motion Control
Modeling, Identification and Control, Vol. 34, No. 4, 23, pp. 75 8, ISSN 89 328 Analysis of Offshore Knuckle Boom Crane Part Two: Motion Control Morten K. Bak Michael R. Hansen Department of Engineering
More informationDynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems
Dynamic backstepping control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems ZHANG Sheng *, QIAN Wei-qi (7.6) Computational Aerodynamics Institution, China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center, Mianyang, 6,
More informationAdaptive Nonlinear Control Allocation of. Non-minimum Phase Uncertain Systems
2009 American Control Conference Hyatt Regency Riverfront, St. Louis, MO, USA June 10-12, 2009 ThA18.3 Adaptive Nonlinear Control Allocation of Non-minimum Phase Uncertain Systems Fang Liao, Kai-Yew Lum,
More informationWE PROPOSE a new approach to robust control of robot
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOL. 14, NO. 1, FEBRUARY 1998 69 An Optimal Control Approach to Robust Control of Robot Manipulators Feng Lin and Robert D. Brandt Abstract We present a new
More informationFEEDBACK LINEARIZATION WITH FUZZY COMPENSATION FOR ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC ACTUATED SYSTEMS
Page 438 FEEDBACK LINEARIZATION WITH FUZZY COMPENSATION FOR ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC ACTUATED SYSTEMS Marcelo Costa Tanaka, ybrtanaka@yahoo.com.br Josiane Maria Macedo Fernandes, josiane.eng.mec@gmail.com Andrew
More informationRESEARCH ON AIRBORNE INTELLIGENT HYDRAULIC PUMP SYSTEM
8 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH ON AIRBORNE INTELLIGENT HYDRAULIC PUMP SYSTEM Jungong Ma, Xiaoye Qi, Juan Chen BeiHang University,Beijing,China jgma@buaa.edu.cn;qixiaoye@buaa.edu.cn;sunchenjuan@hotmail.com
More informationAn Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems
,,, 323 E-mail: mxsun@zjut.edu.cn :, Lyapunov( ),,.,,,.,,. :,,, An Approach of Robust Iterative Learning Control for Uncertain Systems Mingxuan Sun, Chaonan Jiang, Yanwei Li College of Information Engineering,
More informationRobust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft
Robust Adaptive Attitude Control of a Spacecraft AER1503 Spacecraft Dynamics and Controls II April 24, 2015 Christopher Au Agenda Introduction Model Formulation Controller Designs Simulation Results 2
More informationADAPTIVE FORCE AND MOTION CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN CONSTRAINED MOTION WITH DISTURBANCES
ADAPTIVE FORCE AND MOTION CONTROL OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS IN CONSTRAINED MOTION WITH DISTURBANCES By YUNG-SHENG CHANG A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
More informationA Model-Free Control System Based on the Sliding Mode Control Method with Applications to Multi-Input-Multi-Output Systems
Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference of Control, Dynamic Systems, and Robotics (CDSR'17) Toronto, Canada August 21 23, 2017 Paper No. 119 DOI: 10.11159/cdsr17.119 A Model-Free Control System
More informationOutput Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems
Output Regulation of Uncertain Nonlinear Systems with Nonlinear Exosystems Zhengtao Ding Manchester School of Engineering, University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M3 9PL, United Kingdom zhengtaoding@manacuk
More informationAdaptive NN Control of Dynamic Systems with Unknown Dynamic Friction
Adaptive NN Control of Dynamic Systems with Unknown Dynamic Friction S. S. Ge 1,T.H.LeeandJ.Wang Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore Singapore 117576 Abstract
More informationNEURAL NETWORKS (NNs) play an important role in
1630 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS PART B: CYBERNETICS, VOL 34, NO 4, AUGUST 2004 Adaptive Neural Network Control for a Class of MIMO Nonlinear Systems With Disturbances in Discrete-Time
More informationNONLINEAR BACKSTEPPING DESIGN OF ANTI-LOCK BRAKING SYSTEMS WITH ASSISTANCE OF ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS
NONLINEA BACKSTEPPING DESIGN OF ANTI-LOCK BAKING SYSTEMS WITH ASSISTANCE OF ACTIVE SUSPENSIONS Wei-En Ting and Jung-Shan Lin 1 Department of Electrical Engineering National Chi Nan University 31 University
More informationDSCC PASSIVE CONTROL OF A HYDRAULIC HUMAN POWER AMPLIFIER USING A HYDRAULIC TRANSFORMER
Proceedings of the ASME 25 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference DSCC25 October 28-3, 25, Columbus, Ohio, USA DSCC25-9734 PASSIVE CONTROL OF A HYDRAULIC HUMAN POWER AMPLIFIER USING A HYDRAULIC TRANSFORMER
More informationChaos suppression of uncertain gyros in a given finite time
Chin. Phys. B Vol. 1, No. 11 1 1155 Chaos suppression of uncertain gyros in a given finite time Mohammad Pourmahmood Aghababa a and Hasan Pourmahmood Aghababa bc a Electrical Engineering Department, Urmia
More informationModelling the Dynamics of Flight Control Surfaces Under Actuation Compliances and Losses
Modelling the Dynamics of Flight Control Surfaces Under Actuation Compliances and Losses Ashok Joshi Department of Aerospace Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Powai, Mumbai, 4 76, India
More informationQuanser NI-ELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control. DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual
Quanser NI-ELVIS Trainer (QNET) Series: QNET Experiment #02: DC Motor Position Control DC Motor Control Trainer (DCMCT) Student Manual Table of Contents 1 Laboratory Objectives1 2 References1 3 DCMCT Plant
More informationRegulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii
Regulating Web Tension in Tape Systems with Time-varying Radii Hua Zhong and Lucy Y. Pao Abstract A tape system is time-varying as tape winds from one reel to the other. The variations in reel radii consist
More informationA Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of Nonlinear Systems with Unknown Control Direction
Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 16 Vol I, IMECS 16, March 16-18, 16, Hong Kong A Discrete Robust Adaptive Iterative Learning Control for a Class of
More informationState and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems
State and Parameter Estimation Based on Filtered Transformation for a Class of Second-Order Systems Mehdi Tavan, Kamel Sabahi, and Saeid Hoseinzadeh Abstract This paper addresses the problem of state and
More informationA Sliding Mode Controller Using Neural Networks for Robot Manipulator
ESANN'4 proceedings - European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks Bruges (Belgium), 8-3 April 4, d-side publi., ISBN -9337-4-8, pp. 93-98 A Sliding Mode Controller Using Neural Networks for Robot
More informationIndex. Index. More information. in this web service Cambridge University Press
A-type elements, 4 7, 18, 31, 168, 198, 202, 219, 220, 222, 225 A-type variables. See Across variable ac current, 172, 251 ac induction motor, 251 Acceleration rotational, 30 translational, 16 Accumulator,
More information