arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Apr 1994

Transcription

1 Preprint EFUAZ April 1994 arxiv:hep-th/ v1 23 Apr 1994 Comment on The Klein-Gordon Oscillator ( S. Bruce and P. Minning, Nuovo Cim. 106A (1993) 711) Valeri V. Dvoeglazov Escuela de Física, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas Ciudad Universitaria, Antonio Dovalí Jaime, s/n Zacatecas, ZAC., México Submitted to Nuovo Cimento A On leave of absence from Dept. Theor. and Nucl. Phys., Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya str., 83, Saratov RUSSIA valeri@bufa.reduaz.mx, dvoeglazov@main1.jinr.dubna.su

2 Abstract The different ways of description of the S = 0 particle with oscillator-like interaction are considered. The results are in conformity with the previous paper of S. Bruce and P. Minning.

3 In connection with the publications of Moshinsky et al. [1] the interest in the model with a S = 1/2 Hamiltonian that is linear in both momenta and coordinates [2] has grown recently [3]. Analogous type of interaction has been considered for the case of S = 0 and S = 1 Duffin-Kemmer field [4] and for the case of S = 0 Klein-Gordon field [5]. In the paper [5] the operators Q, coordinate, and P, momentum, have been represented in n n matrix form Q = ˆη q, P = ˆη p, (1) with ˆη 2 = 1. The interaction in the Klein-Gordon equation has been introduced in the following way: P P imˆγˆω Q, (2) where for the sake of completeness ˆΩ is chosen by 3 3 matrix with coefficients ˆΩ ij = ω i δ ij (the case of anisotropic oscillator). The ˆγ matrix obeys the following anticommutation relations: {ˆγ,ˆη} = 0, ˆγ 2 = 1. (3) The Klein-Gordon equation for Ψ( q, t), the wave function which could be expanded in two-component form, is then 2 t 2Ψ( q,t) = ( p 2 +m 2 q ˆΩ 2 q +mˆγ trω+m 2) Ψ( q,t), (4) what gives the energy spectrum [5] E 2 (a)n i m 2 = 2m(ω 1 N 1 +ω 2 N 2 +ω 3 N 3 ), N 1,N 2,N 3 = 0,1,2... E 2 (b)n i m 2 = 2m(ω 1 (N 1 +1)+ω 2 (N 2 +1)+ω 3 (N 3 +1)). (5) It becomes, up to an additive constant, the spectrum of the anisotropic oscillator in the non-relativistic limit. However, the physical sense of implementing the matrices ˆη and ˆγ in [5] is obscure. In this short communication we try to attach some physical foundations to this procedure. It is well-known some ways to recast the Klein-Gordon equation in the Hamiltonian form [6]-[10]. First of all, the Klein-Gordon equation could be re-written to the system of two coupled equations [8,p.98] Ψ x α = κξ α, Ξ α = κψ, (6) xα where κ = mc/ h (in the following we use the system where c = h = 1). By means of redefining the components they are easy to present in the matrix Hamiltonian form 1

4 (cf. with [11]) φ 0 p 1 p 2 p φ i χ 1 t χ 2 = p p m χ χ 2, (7) χ 3 p χ 3 provided that Using matrices { φ = i t Ψ+mΨ χ i = i i Ψ = p i Ψ i j k α = i, β = j k (8) (9) ( i, j, k are the orth-vectors of the Euclidean basis) and substituting analogously [1a], i. e., p p imωβ r, we come to the equation for upper component (E 2 m 2 )φ = [ p 2 +m 2 ω 2 r 2 3mω ] φ, (10) what coincides with Eq. (10a) of ref. [5] in the case ω 1 = ω 2 = ω 3. The similar formulation also originates from the Duffin-Kemmer approach [12]. In this case the wave function Φ = column(φ 1,φ 2,χ i ) is five-dimensional and its components are φ 1 = (i t Ψ+mΨ)/ 2 φ 2 = (i t Ψ mψ)/ 2 (11) χ i = i i Ψ = p i Ψ. It satisfies the equation i Φ t = ( B p+mβ0 ) Φ, Bµ = [β 0,β µ ] (12) (our choice of 5 5 dimensional β-matrices corresponds to ref. [4b]). As shown there, the substitution p p imωη 0 r, where η =, (13)

5 leads to the equation (10) for both φ 1 and φ 2. Let us remark, in both the approaches based on Eq. (7) and the Duffin-Kemmer approach, Eq. (12), we have the equation (E 2 m 2 )χ i = (p i imωx i )(p j +imωx j )χ j (14) for down components, which seems to not be reduced to oscillator-like equation. Then, Sakata-Taketani approach [9, 10] is characterized by the equation which we write in the form: i { t Φ = p(τ3 +iτ 2 ) p +mτ 3 }Φ, (15) 2m with τ i being the Pauli matrices. Φ = column(φ,χ) is a two-component wave function with the components which could be written as following: { φ = (Ψ+ i m tψ)/ 2 χ = (Ψ i m tψ)/ (16) 2. From the previous experience we learned that in order to get the oscillator-like equation we need to do substitution with matrix which anticommutes with matrix structure of the momentum part of the equation. In our case the matrix which has this property is τ 1 matrix. Therefore, we do the substitution and come to p p imωτ 1 r (17) E 2 ξ = [ p 2 +m 2 ω 2 r 2 3mω +m 2] ξ, (18) where ξ = φ + χ and, to the analogous equation for η = φ χ = E (φ + χ). In the m process of calculations we convinced ourselves that the Hamiltonian H = 1 ( p 2 +m 2 ω 2 x 2 3mω ) (τ 3 +iτ 2 )+mτ 3 (19) 2m is the same as in [4b,formula (3.9)] since τ 1 (τ 3 +iτ 2 )τ 1 = (τ 3 +iτ 2 ) and (τ 3 +iτ 2 )τ 1 = τ 3 +iτ 2. Let us also recall the Dirac oscillator in (1 + 1) dimensions [13]. Curiously, the formula (7) in (1 + 1) dimensions looks like as the Dirac equation in the case of the choice of γ-matrices as following: In the case of the choice of γ-matrices as in ref. [14], i. e., α = τ x, β = τ z. (20) γ 0 = τ 1 γ 1 = iτ 3, (21) in order to obtain the Dirac oscillator it is necessary to do substitution (17). I am grateful to A. del Sol Mesa for discussions on the subject of this communication. 3

6 References [1] a) M. Moshinsky and A. Szczepaniak, J. Phys. A22(17), L817-L819 (1989) b) M. Moshinsky, G. Loyola and C. Villegas, in Proc. of the XIII Oaxtepec Symposium on Nuclear Physics. Notas de Física 13 (1), (1990) c) M. Moshinsky et al., in Proc. of the Rio de Janeiro Int. Workshop on Relativistic Aspects of Nuclear Physics. Eds. T. Kodama et al. World Scientific, Singapore, 1990, pp d) M. Moshinsky, G. Loyola and A. Szczepaniak, in Anniversary Volume in Honour of J. J. Giambiaggi. Eds. H. Falomir et al. World Scientific, Singapore, 1990, pp e) C. Quesne and M. Moshinsky, J. Phys. A23(12), (1990) f) M. Moshinsky, G. Loyola and C. Villegas, J. Math. Phys. 32(2), (1991) g) V. I. Kukulin, G. Loyola and M. Moshinsky, Phys. Lett. A158(1-2), (1991) h) M. Moshinsky and G. Loyola, Found. Phys. 23(2), (1993) i) A. González, G. Loyola and M. Moshinsky, Rev. Mex. Fiz. 40(1), (1994) [2] a) D. Itô, K. Mori and E. Carrieri, Nuovo Cim. 51A(4), (1967) b) N. V. V. J. Swamy, Phys. Rev. 180(5), (1969) c) P. A. Cook, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 1(10), (1971) d) Y. M. Cho, Nuovo Cim. 23A(3), (1974) [3] a) M. Moreno and A. Zentella, J. Phys. A22(17), L821-L825 (1989) b) M. Moreno, R. Martínez and A. Zentella, Mod. Phys. Lett. A5(12), (1990) c) J. Benítez, R. P. Martínez y Romero, H. N. Núñez-Yepez and A. L. Salas-Brito, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64(14), (1990); ibid 65(16), 2085(E) (1990) d) J. Beckers and N. Debergh, Phys. Rev. D42(4), (1990) e) O. Castaños, A. Frank, R. López and L. F. Urrutia, Phys. Rev. D43(2), (1991) f) R. Martínez y Romero, M. Moreno and A. Zentella, Phys. Rev. D43(6), (1991) g) C. Quesne, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A6(9), (1991) h) L. M. Jones, Preprint Ill-(TH)-91-24, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1991 i) V. V. Dixit, T. S. Santhanam and W. D. Thacker, J. Math. Phys. 33(3), (1992) j) A. Szczepaniak and A. G. Williams, Phys. Rev. D 47(3), (1993) k) J. P. Crawford, J. Math. Phys. 34(10), (1993) l) V. M. Villalba, Preprint hep-th , Caracas, Oct [4] a) J. Beckers, N. Debergh and A. G. Nikitin, J. Math. Phys. 33(10), (1992) b) N. Debergh, J. Ndimubandi and D. Strivay, Zeitshr. Phys. 56(3), (1992) c) Y. Nedjadi and R. C. Barrett, Preprint CNP-93-21, Surrey U., 1993 [5] S. Bruce and P. Minning, Nuovo Cim. 106A(5), (1993); ibid 107A(1), 169(E) (1994) [6] a) N. Kemmer, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 166(924), (1938) b) E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 11, 225 (1938) [7] a) A. March, Quantum Mechanics of Particles and Wave Fields. John Wiley. New York, 1951, p. 176 b) A. Visconti, Quantum Field Theory. Vol. I. Pergamon Press, 1969, p. 183 [8] E. M. Corson, Introduction to Tensor, Spinors, and Relativistic Wave-Equations. Hafner Pub. Co. New York, 1953 [9] S. Sakata and M. Taketani, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. (Japan) 22, 757 (1940) [10] a) H. Feshbach and F. Villars, Rev. Mod. Phys. 30(1), (1958) b) A. S. Davydov, Quantum Mechanics. Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., 1968, section 56, 59 [11] M. D. Kostin, Phys. Lett. A 125(2-3), (1987) [12] a) R. J. Duffin, Phys. Rev. 54(12), 1114 (1938) b) N. Kemmer, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A 173(952), (1939) [13] F. Dominguez-Adame, Europhys. Lett. 13(3), (1990); Phys. Lett. A162(1), 18-20(1992) [14] F. Cooper et al., Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 187(1), 1-28 (1988) 4