arxiv:hep-th/ v2 20 Sep 2000

Transcription

1 UOSTP SNUST 99-0 hep-th/ revise version Cosmic Holography 1 arxiv:hep-th/990173v 0 Sep 000 Dongsu Bak 1 an Soo-Jong Rey Physics Department, University of Seoul, Seoul Korea 1 Physics Department & Center for High-Energy Physics Seoul National University, Seoul Korea sbak@mach.uos.ac.kr, sjrey@gravity.snu.ac.kr abstract A version of holographic principle for the cosmology is propose, which ictates that the particle entropy within the cosmological apparent horizon shoul not excee the gravitational entropy associate with the apparent horizon. It is shown that, in the Friemann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmology, the open Universe as well as a restricte class of atمخ cases are compatible with the principle, whereas close Universe is not. It is also foun that inمخationary universe after the big-bang is incompatible with the cosmic holography. 1 Work supporte in part by BK-1 Initiative Program an KRF International Collaboration Grant

2 The holographic principle in quantum gravity is rstمح suggeste by tلا Hooft[1] an, later, extene to string theory by Susskin[]. The most raical part of the principle is that the egrees of freeom of a spatial region resie not in the bulk but in the bounary. Further, the number of bounary egrees of freeom per Planck area shoul not excee unity. Recently, the holographic principle is applie to the stanar cosmological context by Fischler an Susskin[3]. This Fischler-Susskin version of cosmological holographic principle emans that the particle entrophy containe in a volume of particle horizon shoul not excee the area of the horizon in Planck units. The string cosmology is also teste by the Fischler-Susskin holographic principle[4]. In both cases, the matter contents as well as the spacetime geometry of the universe are restricte by the holographic principle alone an the results appear to be consistent with the recent measurement of the reshift-to-istance relation an the theory of the large scale structure formation[5]. In applying the holography in the cosmological context, several outstaning questions still remain unanswere. One of them is concerning a natural choice of the holographic bounary. Fischler an Susskin have chosen it to be the particle horizon, but it is not clear if the choice is consistent with other physical principles. In this note, we will propose a simple choice of the bounary surface base on the concept of cosmological apparent horizon that is a bounary hypersurface of an anti-trappe region an has a topology of S. It turns out that there is natural gravitational entropy associate with the apparent horizon an the associate holographic principle emans that the particle entrophy insie the apparent horizon shoul not excee the apparent-horizon gravitational entropy. Moreover, the holography base on the apparent horizon obeys the first law of thermoynamics, in sharp contrast to that base on the particle horizon. We shall apply the propose principle to the FRW cosmology an show that, in both the stanar cosmology an the string cosmology, the open universe as well as restricte class of atمخ universe are compatible, while the close universe is not. We shall further show that the inمخationary senario for the stanar cosmology is not compatible with the cosmic holography. Cosmological Apparent Horizon an Gravitational Entropy: We shall consier the spatially homogeneous an isotropic universe escribe by the FRW metric, s = t +a r (t) 1 kr +a (t)r م 1, (1) where k = 0, 1, +1 correspon to a, atمخ open or close Universe respectively. Using the spherical symmetry, the metric can be rewritten as s = h ab x a x b ﷺr + مx) ) 1, () where x 0 = t, x 1 = r an the two metric h ab = iag [ ] a 1, 1 kr is introuce. A ynamical apparent horizon is eمحne by h ab a ﷺr b = ﷺr 0, which implies that the vector ﷺr is null (or 1

3 egenerate) on the apparent horizon surface. The explicit evaluation of the conition reas ﷺr AH = 1 H + ka, (3) where H = aپ/a is the Hubble parameter. The expansion θ IN (θ OUT ) of the ingoing (outgoing) null geoesic congruence are given by θ IN = H 1 ﷺkr 1 ﷺr a θ OUT = H + 1 ﷺkr 1 ﷺr a. (4) The region of spherically symmetric spacetime is referre to as trappe (antitrappe) if the expansions of both in- an out-going null geoesics, normal to the spatial 1 sphere with a raius ﷺr centere at the origin, are negative (positive). The region will be calle normal if ingoing rays have negative expansion but the outgoing rays have positive expansion. The region ) ( > ﷺr of H + k 1 ) ( < ﷺr is, then, antitrappe, whereas the region of H + k 1 is normal a a (assuming H > 0). The bounary hypersurface of the antitrappe spacetime region is nothing but the apparent horizon surface. The ingoing rays outsie the horizon actually propagate in the irection of the growing,ﷺr whereas the ingoing rays insie the horizon are moving towar the origin. In general, the raius of the apparant horizon, ﷺr AH, changes in time. But, for example, in the e Sitter universe where a(t) = a 0 e Ht with a constant H an k = 0, the apparent horizon, ﷺr AH = 1, is constant in time an agrees with the cosmological event horizon of the e Sitter H space. The antitrappe region outsie of the apparent horizon in the e Sitter space can never be seen in the comoving observer locate at the origin. However, in generic situation, the apparent horizon evolves in time an visiblity of the outsie antitrappe region epens on the time evelopement of the apparent horizon. In case the ﷺr AH becomes smaller in time, the spatial region outsie the horizon can never be seen. On the other han, if it grows, the spatial region outsie of the horizon at a given time may be observe at later time. The situation here is reminiscent of what is happening with the black-hole apparent horizon. Namely, the trappe region can never be seen by an outsie observer if the horizon of the black grows by an infalling matter, while once-trappe region may become normal if the apparent horizon shrinks by an evaporation of the black hole in presence of the Hawking raiation. For the total energy insie a sphere of raius,ﷺr we introuce an energy eمحne by E ( 1)V (5),(ﷺr b ﷺr rﷺ (1 h ab a 16πG where V = π ( ) enotes the volume of the -imensional unit ball. This is actually the Γ +1 irect ( + 1) imensional generalization of the (3+1) imensional one given by Misner an

4 Sharp[7]. It is interesting to note that the energy surroune by the apparent horizon is given by E ( 1)V 16πG rﷺ AH, which agrees with the expression for the mass in the +1 imensional Schwarzschiel black hole once the apparent horizon is replace by the event horizon of the black hole. In terms of the energy-momentum tensor of matter T ab that is the projection of the +1 energy-momentum tensor T αβ to the normal irection of the 1 sphere, one may eمحne the work ensity by an the energy-supply vector by w 1 Tab h ab, (6) (7).ﷺr rﷺ+w a ψ a T a b b As note in Ref. [8], the work ensity at the apparent horizon may be viewe as the work one by the change of the apprent horizon an the energy-supply at the horizon is total energy owمخ through the apparent horizon. The Einstein equation relates these quantities by E = Aψ +w V. (8) where A = V ﷺr 1 an V = V ﷺr. This equation may be interprete as unifie first law. The entropy is associate with the energy-supply term, which in fact can be rewritten, with again help of the Einstein equations, as with the surface gravity κ eمحne by Aψ = κ 8π A+rﷺ ( E ﷺr ), (9) κ 1 h (10).ﷺr a hh ab b At the apparent horizon, the last term in (9) rops out an, then, the ynamic entropy of the gravity is ientiمحe with S = A that is a quarter of the area of the apparent horizon measure 4 in the Planck unit. This is irect ( + 1) imensional generalization of the eمحnition of ynamic entropy introuce by Haywar for the (3 + 1) case[8]. More precisely, the ynamic entropy associate with the apparent horizon is We now apply the eمحnition to the FRW universe ictate by S AH = V 4 rﷺ 1 AP. (11) H + k a = 16π ( 1) ρ, غa a = 8π [( )ρ+p], (1) ( 1) 3

5 with the energy-momentum conservation t (ρa )+p t a = 0. (13) The projecte (1 + 1)-imensional energy-momentum tensor for the FRW cosmology reas [ T ab = iag ρ, ] p. (14) 1 kr From (1), the Misner-Sharp energy can be evaluate, in terms of the matter ensity, as E = ( 1)V (H + ka ) = V 16π ﷺr ρ, (15) which is the matter ensity multiplie by the at-volumeمخ in spatial imensions. One shoul note that the at-volumeمخ is ifferent from the spatial volume (i.e. V p = V a r r 0 1 kr ) of raius ﷺr in case of the open or close universe. This iscrepancy appears ue to the gravity contribution to the energy in aition to the matter contribution. Having clariمحe the issue of the cosmological entropy, we now state a version of the cosmic holographic principle base on the cosmological apparent horizon: the particle entropy insie the apparent horizon can never excee the apparent-horizon gravitational entropy. The main ifference from the Fischler-Susskin version of the cosmological holography lies in the choice of the horizon; namely in the Fischler-susskin proposal, the particle horizon an a quarter of the associate area for the gravitational entropy is chosen for the holography. In the cosmological context, there apeare two ifferent kins of horizon base on the light paths[6]. The particle horizon that speciمحes the visible region for a comoving observer at time t, is expresse as ﷺr PH = a(t)g 1( t t ), (16) t I a(t ) where G(x) x 0 y 1 ky an t I represents the initial moment of the Universe. (In case the universe has no beginning, t I =.) On the other han, the cosmological event horizon that speciمحes the bounary of the spatial region to be seen in the future by the comoving observer reas ﷺr EH = a(t)g 1( t F t t ), (17) a(t ) where t F is the nalمح moment of the universe. This is contraste to the fact that the apparent horizon in (3) oes not refer to the initial or nalمح moment where our ability of physical escription often breaks own. Cosmic Holography Teste Against FRW Unverse: The holographic principle may restrict the matter contents of our universe because it involves the particle entropy of universe. Since matter contents are moling the geometry an evolution of the Universe, the Universe itself 4

6 conforme with the holography principle may well belong to a restricte class. The cosmic holography conition leas to an inequality σvol AH (t) A AH(t). (18) 4 where Vol AH (t) = V rah (t) 0 r r 1 1 kr is the coorinate volume insie the apparent horizon. The left sie of (18) is the total particle entropy insie the apparent horizon, where the coorinate entropy ensity is constant in time. In testing the conition to the FRW cosmology, we shall restrict ourselves to the cases of matters with simple equation of state p = γρ. In the atمخ Universe (k = 0), the conition is explicitly 4σ a 1 (t)aپ(t) 1. (19) Since a(t) = a 0 t(1+γ) for γ 1 an a(t) = a 0 e H0t for γ = 1, one conclues that the holography conition is satisمحel all the time followe by the Planck time for γ 1 once it is satisمحe at the Planck time, t t P. The matters with γ > 1 that are also inconsistent with special relativity, is not compatible with the cosmic holography conition. Letusnowturntothecaseofopenuniverse. Fortheiscussion ofopenancloseuniverses, it is convenient to introuce the conformal time η, The holography conition now reas t t η = a(t ). (0) 4σ χ(η) 0 ξsinh 1 ξ a 1 (η)sinh 1 1. (1) (χ(η)) where we eمحne χ(η) by sinhχ(η) = r AH (η). The solutions of the equation of motion (1) are given by a(η) = a 0 ( sinh (K 1)η ) 1 K 1. () where K = (1+γ), η (0, ) for K 1 > 0 an η (, 0) for K 1 < 0. Here the initial moment correspons to η = 0 for K 1 > 0 an for K 1 < 0. Using the eمحnition of apparent horizon in (3), one nsمح χ(η) = (K 1)η. Using the explicit solution, one may easily show that, for γ 1, the holography conition is satisمحe once satisمحe at the initial moment aroun the Planck epoch. For γ > 1, the maximum of the left han sie of (1) occurs at some satisمحes niteمح time after initial moment an the holography is respecte if this this maximun the boun. But if one assumes that the holography boun is saturate at the Planck epoch, the case of γ > 1 is rejecte by the holography conition. So far the restrictions on the matter contents ue to our holography conition are not quite ifferent from those of Fischler-Susskin holography. But we will see that there is some ifference in the case of the close Universe. 5

7 The holography conition for the close Universe (k = 1) is 4σ χ(η) 0 ξsin 1 ξ a 1 (η)sin 1 1. (3) (χ(η)) where we eمحne χ(η) by sinχ(η) = r AH (η). The solutions of the equation of motion (1) are given by ( ) 1 a(η) = a 0 sin (K 1)η K 1. (4) where η ( ) 1 0, K 1. For the Universe with K 1 < 0 (i.e. γ < 1) begins with inمحnite scale factor a(η), an we shall not iscuss these cases since it is clear that our Universe begins with small scale factor from the observational groun. Noting r AH (η) = sin( (K 1) η), one obtains that χ(η) = K 1 η. Then one nsمح that the universe with γ > 1 are not compatible with the cosmic holography conition. Namely, even if one may satisfy the boun at an initial moment, it is baly violate before reaching the big crunch. This is because the term χ(η) 0 ξsin 1 ξ monotonically grow with time. The situation is worsene if one assumes that the boun saturates at the Planck time scale. In the Fischler-Susskin case, a careful analysis shows that the isfavore region by the holography conition is only for γ 4 1. With = 3, the universe with the matter of 4 1 = 1 3 correspons to raiation-ominate Universe, which is their marginal boun. On the contrary, the cosmic holography conition seems to isfavor any close Universe, cleary an over-restrictive conition. We now consier inمخationary moel of our = 3 Universe. As illustrate in Ref. [3], the particle entropy-area ratio α(t) 4σVol AH(t) A AH (t) at the time of ecoupling is α(t D ) 10 8, (5) where the ecoupling time is t D in Planck units. Since α(t) is proportional to t 1 uring the raiation ominant era, the expresion of the ratio in the era reas α(t) = 10 8 [ td t ]1. (6) This show that α(t) 1 for all the time later Planck time in case Universe starts off as a raiation-ominant Universe after the Planck time. However, if one assume the inمخationary perios after the Planck epoch an an exit to the raiation-ominant Universe, the above conclusion rastically change. To illustrate this, let us note that in the e Sitter phase, the α(t) scales like e (+1)Ht = e 4Ht with constant H. For example, the inمخationary factor The estimation use in the Ref. [3] relies upon the particle-horizon base holography, but, in case of stanar cosmology, the particle horizon iffers from apparent horizon by a constant factor of orer one. Thus the estimation is still vali for our version of the holography. 6

8 P e Ht E /e Ht B for the chaotic inمخationary senario, where t E an t B enote respectively the exit time an the beginning of the inمخation, is obtaine from the theory of galaxy formation[9]. This implies that the α(t B ) is bigger than α(t E ) by a factor The cosmic holography conition is clearly incompatible with this result. Furthermore, any moels where α(t) scales t C with C < 1 after Planck epoch, violates the holographic principle, so any typical post-big-bang inمخationary moels that solve the the atnessمخ problem by an ampliمحcation of the scale factor appear to be incompatible with the holography. Does only the pre-big-bang super-inمخationary senario[10] survive out of the restrictive holography conition or, otherwise, shoul one resort to the regularity of the Planck epoch to solve the atnessمخ an the horizon problem? One is thus le to conclue that the holography base on apparent horizon, espite its aesthetically simple an appealing features such as compatibility with the rst-lawمح of thermoynamics, are not totally satisfactory when applie to cosmology. Nevertheless, we trust that our proposal base on apparent horizon bears an important core of truth provie further speciمحcation is supplie on the holographic surfaces an boune regions therein. After the present work has appeare, Bousso has mae an interesting proposal [11] concerning a covariant entropy boun vali for all surfaces in all physical spacetimes. In particular, Bousso has establishe that Bekenstein boun hols if the surface permits a complete, future-irecte, ingoing null geoesic congruences. This singles out the apparent horizon as the largest amissible holographic surface, thus conمحrming our proposal. Boussoلاs proposal has also remeie nicely ifficulties we have pose in the present paper. Most relevantly, it was shown that the holography boun is satisمحe only if the surface obeys the completeness conition an, when ealing with close universe, the entropy ought to be interprete as that on null geoesic congruences irecte towar the smaller part of the universe. Before closing, we woul like to make a brief comments on the string cosmology. If one applies the new cosmic holographic principle to the string cosmology moel consiere in Ref.[4], it is straghtforwar to show that it selects out open Universe together with atمخ universes with γ 1, whilethecloseuniverses areruleout. Hereonemust notethattheapparenthorizon shoul be eمحne with the Einstein frame metric instea of the string-frame metric because the gravitational entropy is associate with the Einstein frame metric although the relevant physics shoul be inepenent of the choice of escription. In view of Boussoلاs proposal [11], the above results shoul be interprete as the conition on completeness of the apparent horizon. The above results are true both the pre-big-bang branch an the post-big-bang branch, so that the time reversal symmetry is respecte by the cosmic holography. In the analysis[4] using the Fischler-Susskin version, any atمخ Universes with matters are rule out by the holography conition. This ifference stems from the fact that the particle horizon in the pre-big-bang cosmology is inمحnite whereas the apparent horizon is niteمح in the pre-big-bang branch. 7

9 References [1] G. tفي Hooft, Dimensional Reuction in Quantum Gravity, in لاSalamfestفي pp (Worl Scientiمحc Co, Singapore, 1993). [] L. Susskin, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) [3] W. Fischler an L. Susskin, Holography an Cosmology, hep-th/ [4] D. Bak an S. Rey, Class. Quantum. Grav. 17 (000) L1 - L7. [5] S. Perlmutter et al., Nature 391 (1998) 51; A.G. Riess et al., Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009; See also, J. Glanz, Science 78 (1997) 799 an references therein. [6] W. Rinler, Mon.Not.Roy.Ast.Soc., 116 (1956) 663. [7] C.W. Misner an D.H. Sharp, Phys. Rev. 136, (1964) B571. [8] S.A. Haywar an S. Mukohyama, Phys. Lett. A56 (1999) 347. [9] See for example A. Line, particle Physics an Inflationary Cosmology, (Harwoo, Lonon, 1990) p. 53. [10] G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B65 (1991) 87. [11] R. Bousso, J. High-Energy Phys (1999) 004; ibi, J. High-Energy Phys (1999) 08. 8