arxiv:physics/ v4 [physics.class-ph] 9 Jul 1999

Transcription

1 AIAA PROPULSION THROUGH ELECTROMAGNETIC SELF-SUSTAINED ACCELERATION arxiv:physics/ v4 [physics.class-ph] 9 Jul 1999 Abstract As is known the repulsion of the volume elements of an uniformly accelerating charge or a charge supporte in an uniform gravitational fiel accounts for the electromagnetic contribution to the charge s inertial an gravitational mass, respectively. This means that the mutual repulsion of the volume elements of the charge prouces the resistance to its accelerate motion. Conversely, the effect of electromagnetic attraction of opposite charges enhances the accelerate motion of the charges provie that they have been initially uniformly accelerate or supporte in an uniform gravitational fiel. The significance of this effect is that it constitutes a possibility of altering inertia an gravitation. Introuction In 1881 J. J. Thomson [1] first realize that a charge particle was more resistant to being accelerate than an otherwise ientical neutral particle. His observation marke the origin of the concept of electromagnetic mass of charge particles. This concept was evelope in a full theory mostly by Heavisie [2], Searle [3], Lorentz [4, 5], Poincaré [6, 7], Abraham [8], Fermi [9, 10] an Rohrlich [11, 12]. It follows from this theory that it is the unbalance 1 repulsion of the volume elements of an accelerating charge particle that causes the resistance to its acceleration known as inertia. Alternatively, the unbalance attraction of accelerating opposite charges results in further enhancement of their acceleration. By the equivalence principle the opposite effects of resistance to like charges acceleration an increase of unlike charges acceleration 1 The mutual repulsion of two inertial like charges is completely balance an therefore there is no net force acting on the charges. Vesselin Petkov Physics Department, Concoria University 1455 De Maisonneuve Boulevar West Montreal, Quebec, Canaa H3G 1M8 vpetkov@alcor.concoria.ca resulting from the unbalance repulsion of like charges an the unbalance attraction of unlike charges, respectively shoul also occur when the charges are in a gravitational fiel. The equivalence principle requires that these effects be present in a gravitational fiel as well but oes not provie any insight into what causes them there. The answer to this question is that it is a spacetime anisotropy aroun massive boies that causes those effects. It manifests itself in the anisotropy of the velocity of electromagnetic signals (for short - the velocity of light). Since it is now believe that the anisotropy of the velocity of light aroun massive boies results from the curvature of spacetime, here we shall iscuss two inepenent results which inicate that the correct interpretation of general relativity is in terms of spacetime anisotropy, not spacetime curvature. While the first result just shows that there is no nee for spacetime curvature since spacetime anisotropy alone accounts for all inertial an gravitational effects, the secon one irectly emonstrates that the stanar curve-spacetime interpretation of general relativity contraicts the gravitational reshift experiments. The implication that there is no spacetime curvature is crucial not only for unerstaning an possible utilization of the effects iscusse but also for gaining eeper insight into the nature of inertia an gravitation. One far-reaching consequence from the anisotropy of spacetime is that inertia an gravitation can (at least in principle) be electromagnetically manipulate. It is the anisotropy of spacetime that causes the phenomena traitionally calle inertia an gravitation. An analysis of the classical electromagnetic mass theory in conjunction with general relativity leas to the conclusion that (i) gravitational attraction is cause by the anisotropy of spacetime aroun massive objects an (ii) inertia (an inertial mass) as escribe in an accelerating reference frame originates from the space- 1

2 time anisotropy in that frame [13, 14]. The essence of this analysis is as follows. Consier a classical 2 electron in the Earth s gravitational fiel. Due to the anisotropy of the velocity of light in a non-inertial reference frame (supporte in the Earth s gravitational fiel) the electric fiel of an electron on the Earth s surface is istorte which gives rise to a self-force originating from the interaction of the electron charge with its istorte electric fiel 3. This self-force tries to force the electron to move ownwars 4 an coincies with what is traitionally calle the gravitational force. The electric self-force is proportional to the gravitational acceleration g an the coefficient of proportionality is the mass attache to the electron s electric fiel which proves to be equal to the electron mass. The anisotropy of the spee of light in the Earth s vicinity is compensate if the electron is falling towar the Earth s surface with an acceleration g. In other wors, the electron is falling in orer to keep its electric fiel not istorte. A Coulomb (not istorte) fiel oes not give rise to any self-force acting on the electron; that is why the motion of a falling electron is non-resistant (inertial, or geoesic) 5. If the electron is prevente from falling it can no longer compensate the anisotropy of the spee of light, its fiel istorts an as a result a self-force pulling the electron ownwars arises. The resistance which an electron offers to being accelerate is similarly escribe in an accelerating reference frame as cause by the anisotropy of the spee of light there. When the electron accelerates its electric fiel istorts an the electron resists that eformation. In such a way, given the fact that the spee of light is anisotropic in non-inertial reference frames, all inertial an gravitational effects (incluing the equivalence of inertial an gravitational mass) of the electron an the other elementary charge particles are fully an consistently accounte for if both the inertial an passive gravitational mass of the elementary charge particles are entirely 6 electromagnetic in origin. The 2 At present quantum mechanical treatment of the electromagnetic mass is not possible since quantum mechanics oes not offer a moel for the quantum object itself. 3 That explanation of the origin of the self-force is another way of saying that the force arises from the mutual unbalance repulsion of the volume elements of the electron charge. 4 The self-force which starts to act on the electron whenever its electric fiel istorts effectively resists this istortion. That is why the self-force strives to make the electron move ownwars with an acceleration g in orer to compensate the spacetime anisotropy which in turn will eliminate the istortion of the electron s electric fiel. 5 It is clear from here that a falling electron oes not raiate since its electric fiel is the Coulomb fiel an therefore oes not contain the raiation r 1 terms [13]. 6 On the one han, the entirely electromagnetic mass of an elementary charge particle - an electron for example - is supgravitational attraction an inertia of all matter can be accounte for as well if it is assume that there are no elementary neutral particles in nature. A irect consequence from here is that only charge particles or particles that consists of charge constituents possess inertial an passive gravitational mass 7. State another way, it is only elementary charges that comprise a boy; there is no such funamental quantity as mass. This means that a boy s (inertial or passive gravitational) mass correspons to the energy store in the electric fiels of all elementary charge particles comprising the boy. However, the inertial an passive gravitational mass of a boy manifest themselves as such - as a measure of the boy s resistance to being accelerate - only if the boy is subjecte to an acceleration (kinematic or gravitational). This resistance originates from the unbalance mutual repulsion of the volume elements of every elementary charge constituent of the boy. The active gravitational mass of a boy proves to be also electromagnetic originating from its charge constituents 8 since there is no mass but only charges. As there is no nee for spacetime curvature since all gravitational effects are fully accounte for by the electromagnetic nature of the passive gravitational mass an the anisotropic velocity of light in the vicinity of a massive object [13, 14], it follows that it is the object s charges (an their fiels) that cause that anisotropy of spacetime aroun the object. One thing concerning the electromagnetic mass theporte by the fact that the electromagnetic mass of the classical electron is equal to its observable mass. On the other han, the electromagnetic mass raises the question of stability of the electron (what keeps its charge together). This question, however, cannot be aequately aresse until a quantum-mechanical moel of the electron structure is obtaine. An important feature of the electromagnetic mass theory is that the stability problem oes not interfere with the erivation of the self-force (acting on a non-inertial electron) containing the electromagnetic mass [13, 14]. This hints that perhaps there is no real problem with the stability of the electron (as a future quantum mechanical moel of the electron itself may fin); if there were one it woul inevitably emerge in the calculation of the self-force. 7 It is evient that in this case the electromagnetic mass theory preicts zero neutrino mass an appears to be in conflict with the apparent mass of the Z 0 boson which is involve in the neutral weak interactions. The resolution of this apparent conflict coul lea to either restricting the electromagnetic mass theory (in a sense that not the entire mass is electromagnetic) or reexamining the facts believe to prove (i) that the Z 0 boson is a funamentally neutral particle (unlike the neutron), an (ii) that it oes possess inertial an gravitational mass if truly neutral. 8 Given that the inertial an passive gravitational masses are electromagnetic the electromagnetic nature of the active gravitational mass follows immeiately since the three kins of masses are equal. 2

3 ory which is often overlooke shoul be especially stresse: even if the mass is viewe as only partly electromagnetic, as presently believe, it still follows that inertia an gravitation are electromagnetic in origin but in part. It shoul be also note that once the fact of the partly electromagnetic origin of inertia an gravitation is fully realize a thorough analysis of this open issue can be carrie out which will most probably lea to the result that electromagnetic interaction is the only cause behin inertia an gravitation which are now regare as separate phenomena 9. The concept of spacetime curvature is in irect contraiction with experiments. A recently obtaine result [15] shows that the gravitational reshift contraicts the curve-spacetime interpretation of general relativity. It has not been notice up to now that both frequency an velocity of a photon change in the gravitational reshift experiment. In such a way the measurement of a change in a photon frequency is in fact an inirect measurement of a change in its local velocity in this experiment. This shows that the local velocity of a photon epens upon its pre-history (whether it has been emitte at the observation point or at a point of ifferent gravitational potential) - a result that contraicts the stanar curve-spacetime interpretation of general relativity which requires that the local velocity of light be always c [16]. Therefore the gravitational reshift emonstrates that general relativity cannot be interprete in terms of spacetime curvature. This situation calls for another interpretation of the mathematical formalism of general relativity. Such a possibility of interpreting the Riemann tensor not in terms of spacetime curvature but in terms of spacetime anisotropy has always existe since the creation of general relativity but receive no attention. In such an interpretation the Riemannian geometry escribes not a curve but an anisotropic spacetime thus linking gravitation to the anisotropy of spacetime [13]. An aitional inication that spacetime aroun massive boies is anisotropic (not curve) comes from the following argument. Accoring to the stanar 9 Such an analysis will be presente in another paper. The basic iea of this analysis is to emonstrate that it is highly unlikely that Nature has invente two rastically ifferent an inepenent causes of gravitation - an anisotropic spacetime for elementary charge particles an a curve spacetime for elementary neutral ones (such as the Z 0 boson if it turns out to be a truly neutral particle). If the mass of the elementary charge particles is regare as only partly electromagnetic, the phenomenon of gravitation becomes even more complicate. Spacetime must be anisotropic (to account for the gravitational interaction of the electromagnetic part of the mass of the particles) as well as curve (to account for the gravitational interaction of the non-electromagnetic part of the mass of the charge particles). curve-spacetime interpretation of general relativity the gravitational effects observe in a non-inertial reference frame N g on the Earth s surface are cause by the curvature of spacetime originating from the Earth s mass. The principle of equivalence requires that what is happening in N g be happening in a noninertial (accelerating) frame N a as well. The gravitational effects in general relativity inclue time an length effects in aition to the pre-relativistic ones (falling of boies an their weight). These, accoring to the stanar interpretation of general relativity, are also cause by the spacetime curvature aroun the Earth. By the principle of equivalence the time an length effects must be present in N a as well. An inertial observer can explain those effects happening in N a by employing only special relativity [17]. An observer in N a, however, can explain them neither by irectly making use of the frame s acceleration nor by the anisotropic velocity of light there since the concepts of time an space are more funamental than the concepts of velocity an acceleration. The noninertial observer in N a has to prove that spacetime in N a is anisotropic ue to N a s acceleration by obtaining the spacetime interval in N a. Only then the observer can erive the time an length effects in N a by using the anisotropic spacetime interval there. Therefore the stanar interpretation of general relativity leas to a picture involving the principle of equivalence that is not quite satisfying: if one cannot istinguish between the effects in N a an in N g then why is the spacetime in N a anisotropic while in N g it is curve. Taking into account the two results iscusse above the picture becomes perfectly consistent: spacetime in both N a an N g is anisotropic (in N a the spacetime anisotropy is cause by the frame s acceleration while in N g it originates from the elementary charges that comprise the Earth). The result that spacetime is anisotropic (in which the velocity of light is ifferent in ifferent irections) has enormous implications for both unerstaning the nature of inertia an gravitation an the possibility of controlling them since both inertia an gravitation turn out to be electromagnetic in origin (at least in part 10 ). There exist two theoretical possibilities for electromagnetic manipulation of inertia an gravitation: (i) Changing the anisotropy of spacetime. Since one of the corollaries of the electromagnetic mass theory is that the anisotropy of spacetime aroun a boy is cause by the boy s charge constituents (an 10 It is now an establishe (but unexplainably ignore [18]) fact from the electromagnetic mass theory that the inertial mass an inertia are at least partly electromagnetic in origin [12, 19]. 3

4 their electromagnetic fiels), the employment of strong electromagnetic fiels can create a local spacetime anisotropy which may lea to a boy being propelle without being subjecte to a irect force. (ii) Using the spacetime anisotropy. Due to the anisotropic velocity of light in an accelerating reference frame the electromagnetic attraction of the opposite charges of an accelerating electric ipole enhances its accelerate motion - it leas to a self-sustaining accelerate motion perpenicular to the ipole s axis [20]. Accoring to the principle of equivalence an electric ipole supporte in an uniform gravitational fiel shoul levitate [21]. In such a way a strong electromagnetic attraction between oppositely charge parts of a non-inertial evice may lea to its propulsion or at least to a reuction of its mass; thus allowing for the external force that accelerates the evice (or the weight of the evice) to be reuce. The possibility of manipulating inertia an gravitation by changing the anisotropy of spacetime was reporte in [14]. This paper eals with the possibility of altering inertia an gravitation by using the spacetime anisotropy. Self-Sustaine Acceleration The equations of classical electroynamics applie to an accelerating electric ipole show that it can unergo self-sustaining accelerate motion perpenicular to its axis, meaning that not only oes the electromagnetic attraction of the opposite charges of a ipole not resist its accelerate motion but further increases it. The application of the principle of equivalence shows that an electric ipole supporte in an uniform gravitational fiel will be also subjecte to a self-sustaine acceleration which may lea to the ipole s levitation. Here we shall erive this effect in a gravitational fiel irectly without applying the equivalence principle. Consier a non-inertial reference frame N g supporte in a gravitational fiel of strength g. The gravitational fiel is irecte opposite to the y axis. A ipole with a separation istance between the two charges is laying along the x axis. Due to the spacetime anisotropy in N g (manifesting itself in the anisotropic velocity of light in N g ) the electric fiel of the negative charge q with coorinates (, 0) at a point with coorinates (0, 0), where the positive charge +q is, is istorte 11 [13] E g + = q 4πǫ o ( n + 2 g n + n + + g ) (1) where n + is a unit vector pointing from the negative charge towar the positive charge an n + = ˆx where ˆx is a unit vector along the x axis. Since g n + = 0 (g is orthogonal to n + ) the electric fiel (1) reuces to E g + = q 4πǫ o 2 ˆx q 4πǫ o g. The force with which the negative charge attracts the positive one in the anisotropic spacetime in N g is [13, 14] ( F g + = q 1 g n ) + 2c 2 E g + where n + is a unit vector pointing from the positive charge towar the negative charge. Noting that g n + = 0 we can write F g + = 4πǫ o 2 ˆx 4πǫ o c 2 g. (2) The first term in (2) is the orinary force with which the negative charge attracts the positive one. The secon term represents the vertical component of the force (2) that is opposite to g an has a levitating effect on the positive charge. The calculation of the force with which the negative charge of the ipole is attracte by the positive one gives F g + = 4πǫ o 2ˆx 4πǫ o c 2 g. (3) The net (self) force acting on the ipole as a whole is irectly obtaine from (2) an (3) F g self = Fg + + Fg + = 2πǫ o c 2 g. (4) Therefore, unlike the attraction of the charges of an inertial ipole which oes not prouce a net force acting on the ipole, the mutual attraction of the charges of a ipole in a gravitational fiel becomes unbalance 11 This is the electric fiel of a charge at rest in a gravitational fiel. If the charge is uniformly accelerate with a = g its electric fiel at a istance from the negative charge is [22, 23] E a + = q ( n + 4πǫ o 2 + a n + n + a This is the electric fiel as escribe in an inertial reference frame. The calculation of the electric fiel in the accelerate frame in which the ipole is at rest gives the same expression ue to the anisotropy of spacetime in that frame [13]. ). 4

5 an results in a self-force which opposes the ipole s weight. The effect of the self-force (4) on the ipole can be explaine in a sense that a fraction of the ipole of mass q 2 m att = 2πǫ o, (5) resulting from the unbalance attraction of the two charges, is subjecte to an acceleration g as long as the ipole stays in a gravitational fiel of strength g. While the mass (5) remains smaller than the ipole mass the effect of the self-force (4) will be a reuction of the ipole mass by m att since the self-force is opposite to the ipole s weight. When m att becomes equal to the ipole mass (i.e. when F g self becomes equal to the weight of the ipole), the ipole starts to levitate. Further increase of m att will result in lifting of the ipole. If the charges of the ipole are an electron an a positron its weight is F = 2m e g, where m e is the mass of the electron (an the positron). Using the electron electromagnetic mass [5] m e = e 2 4πǫ o c 2 r 0, (6) where r 0 is the classical electron raius, we can calculate the resultant force acting on the ipole supporte in a gravitational fiel ( F res = F + F g self = e2 1 2πǫ o c 2 1 ) g. (7) r 0 As seen from (7) the ipole will start to levitate when the separation istance between its charges becomes equal to r 0. However, this coul harly be achieve in a laboratory since r m. Consier now a reference frame N a which is uniformly accelerating with an acceleration a = g. Let the ipole be at rest in N a place in such a way that the acceleration a is perpenicular to its axis. In a similar fashion to what we have one in the case of a ipole in N g here too can be shown that ue to the anisotropic spee of light in N a there is a self-force acting on the ipole as a whole which is given by F a self = q 2 2πǫ o a (8) (the self-force (8) can be irectly obtaine from (4) by applying the equivalence principle an substituting g = a). A fraction of the ipole of mass m att resulting from the unbalance attraction of the two charges will be subjecte to an acceleration a as long as the whole ipole is experiencing the same acceleration a. This means that the fraction of the ipole of mass m att accelerates on its own (ue to the unbalance attraction of the two charges) which results in a reuction of the ipole s resistance to being accelerate by the external force. Therefore in orer to maintain the same acceleration a the external force accelerating the ipole shoul be reuce. State another way, the ipole mass is effectively reuce an the resistance which the ipole offers to being accelerate will reuce as well. When m att becomes equal to the ipole mass the resistance of the ipole to being accelerate will cease an consequently there will be no external force neee to accelerate it. The ipole will continue to maintain its acceleration entirely on its own - it will be in a state of self-sustaine accelerate motion. This type of motion resembles the inertial motion of an object: as a free object continues to move with constant velocity until being prevente from oing so, a ipole (initially accelerate by an external force) whose charges an separation istance ensure that m att is equal to the ipole mass will continue to move with constant acceleration on its own until being prevente from oing so. If the charges of the ipole are an electron an a positron the external force accelerating the ipole will be F ext = 2m e a. Taking into account (8) the ipole will mantain a constant acceleration if F ext + F a self = 2m e a. Noting that for an electron an a positron the mass in (8) will be e 2 m att = 2πǫ o we can write F ext = (2m e m att )a. If we assume that m att > 2m e (which is unlikely to be achieve since the separation istance between the charges shoul be smaller than the imension r 0 of the classical electron consiere) an external force woul be neee to slow own the ipole in orer that it maintains its uniform acceleration a. The effect of mass reuction cause by the mutual attraction of the accelerating ipole s charges can be escribe in the following way as well. Instea of regaring the self-force (8) as subjecting only a part of the ipole of mass m att to the acceleration a it is also possible to say that F a self subjects the whole ipole of mass 2m e to an acceleration a att originating from the unbalance attraction between the electron an 5

6 the positron. Then using the electron electromagnetic mass (6) we obtain the relation between a att an a or e 2 e2 2πǫ o c 2 a att = r 0 2πǫ o a a att = r 0 a. (9) As seen from (9) the ipole will experience a selfsustaine acceleration a att a if r 0. Conclusion At present it oes not appear realistic to expect that a self-sustaine acceleration of a boy (equal or greater than its initial acceleration) can be achieve. However, the possibility for eventual practical applications of the effect of mass reuction can be assesse if macroscopic charge istributions are consiere. It appears that most promising will be the use of specially esigne capacitors like the commercial ones which consist of alternatively charge layers of metal foil rolle into the shape of a cyliner with the cyliner axis parallel to a or g. Such capacitors can be charge to large amounts of charge. There are capacitors alreay available on the market that can carry a charge well above 1C. With such (an greater) amounts of charge the experimental testing of the mass reuction effect appears now possible although it is not a real issue since this effect is a irect consequence of the classical electroynamics when applie to a non-inertial ipole an for this reason there shoul be no oubt that it will be experimentally confirme. The purpose of this paper is to emonstrate that the practical applicability of the mass reuction effect may be within reach if proper technological effort is investe. Acknowlegement I woul like to thank Dr. G. Hathaway for bringing to my attention the papers of Cornish [20] an Griffiths [21] in a iscussion of the effects consiere here. References [1] J. J. Thomson, Phil. Mag. 11, 229 (1881). [4] H. A. Lorentz, Proceeings of the Acaemy of Sciences of Amsteram 6, 809 (1904). [5] H. A. Lorentz, Theory of Electrons, 2n e. (Dover, New York, 1952). [6] H. Poincaré, Compt. Ren. 140, 1504 (1905). [7] H. Poincaré, Reniconti el Circolo Matematico i Palermo 21, 129 (1906). [8] M. Abraham, The Classical Theory of Electricity an Magnetism, 2n e. (Blackie, Lonon, 1950). [9] E. Fermi, Phys. Zeits. 23, 340 (1922). [10] E. Fermi, Atti Aca. Nazl. Lincei 31, 184; 306 (1922). [11] F. Rohrlich, Am. J. Phys. 28, 639 (1960). [12] F. Rohrlich, Classical Charge Particles (Aison-Wesley, New York, 1990). [13] V. Petkov, Ph.D. Thesis, Concoria University, Montreal, [14] V. Petkov, 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Clevelan, Ohio, July 12-15, 1998; Paper AIAA ( [15] V. Petkov, Foun. Phys. Lett., submitte ( [16] C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne an J. A. Wheeler, Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973), p [17] L. Schiff, Am. J. Phys. 28, 340 (1960). [18] P. Pearle, in D. Teplitz, e. Electromagnetism: Paths to Research (Plenum Press, New York, 1982), p [19] J. W. Butler, Am. J. Phys. 37, 1258 (1969). [20] F. H. J. Cornish, Am. J. Phys. 54, 166 (1986). [21] D. J. Griffiths, Am. J. Phys. 54, 744 (1986). [22] J. D. Jackson, Classical Electroynamics, 3r e., (Wiley, New York, 1999), p [23] D. J. Griffiths, Introuction to Electroynamics, 2n e., (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1989), p [2] O. Heavisie, The Electrician 14, 220 (1885). [3] G. F. C. Searle, Phil. Mag. 44, 329 (1897). 6