Chapter 1 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for stochastic differential equations
|
|
- Osborne Ford
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for stochastic differential equations Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément Abstract We establish an integration by parts formula based on jump times in an abstract framewor in order to study the regularity of the law for processes solution of stochastic differential equations with jumps. Key words: Integration by parts formula, Stochastic Equations, Poisson Point Measures. 200 MSC: Primary: 60H07, Secondary: 60G55, 60G57. Introduction We consider the one-dimensional equation X t = x + 0 E c(u, a, X u )dn(u, a) + 0 g(u, X u )du (.) where N is a Poisson point measure of intensity measure µ on some abstract measurable space E. We assume that c and g are infinitely differentiable with respect to t and x, have bounded derivatives of any order and have linear growth with respect to x. Moreover we assume that the derivatives of c are bounded by a function c such that c(a)dµ(a) <. Under these E Vlad Bally Université Paris-Est, Laboratoire d Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées, UMR 8050, 5 Bld Descartes, Champs-sur-marne, Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 2, France vlad.bally@univ-mlv.fr Emmanuelle Clément Université Paris-Est, Laboratoire d Analyse et de Mathématiques Appliquées, UMR 8050, 5 Bld Descartes, Champs-sur-marne, Marne-la-Vallée Cedex 2, France emmanuelle.clement@univ-mlv.fr
2 2 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément hypotheses the equation has a unique solution and the stochastic integral with respect to the Poisson point measure is a Stieltjes integral. Our aim is to give sufficient conditions in order to prove that the law of X t is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure and has a smooth density. If E = R m and if the measure µ admits a smooth density h then one may develop a Malliavin calculus based on the amplitudes of the jumps in order to solve this problem. This has been done first in Bismut [4] and then in Bichteler, Gravereaux and Jacod [3]. But if µ is a singular measure this approach fails and one has to use the noise given by the jump times of the Poisson point measure in order to settle a differential calculus analogous to the Malliavin calculus. This is a much more delicate problem and several approaches have been proposed. A first step is to prove that the law of X t is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure, without taing care of the regularity. A first result in this sense was obtained by Carlen and Pardoux [5] and was followed by a lot of other papers (see [6], [7], [], [3]). The second step is to obtain the regularity of the density. Recently two results of this type have been obtained by Ishiawa and Kunita [0] and by Kuli [2]. In both cases one deals with an equation of the form dx t = g(t, X t )dt + f(t, X t )du t (.2) where U is a Lévy process. The above equation is multi-dimensional (let us mention that the method presented in our paper may be used in the multi-dimensional case as well, but then some technical problems related to the control of the Malliavin covariance matrix have to be solved - and for simplicity we preferred to leave out this ind of difficulties in this paper). Ishiawa and Kunita [0] used the finite difference approach given by J. Picard [4] in order to obtain sufficient conditions for the regularity of the density of the solution of an equation of type (.) (in a somehow more particular form, close to linear equations). The result in that paper produces a large class of examples in which we get a smooth density even for an intensity measure which is singular with respect to the Lebesgue measure. The second approach is due to Kuli [2]. He settled a Malliavin type calculus based on perturbations of the time structure in order to give sufficient conditions for the smoothness of the density. In his paper the coefficient f is equal to one so the non degeneracy comes from the drift term g only. As before, he obtains the regularity of the density even if the intensity measure µ is singular. He also proves that under some appropriate conditions, the density is not smooth for a small t so that one has to wait before the regularization effect of the noise produces a regular density. The result proved in our paper is the following. We consider the function α(t, a, x) = g(x) g(x + c(t, a, x)) + (g x c + t c)(t, a, x). Except the regularity and boundedness conditions on g and c we consider the following non degeneracy assumption. There exists a measurable function α
3 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 3 such that α(t, a, x) α(a) > 0 for every (t, a, x) R + E R. We assume that there exists a sequence of subsets E n E such that µ(e n ) < and lim n µ(e n ) ln( dµ(a)) = θ <. E n α(a) We need this hypothesis in order to control the error due to the fact that we localize our differential calculus on a non degeneracy set. If θ = 0 then, for every t > 0, the law of X t has a C density with respect to the Lebesgue measure. Suppose now that θ > 0 and let q N. Then, for t > 6θ(q + 2)(q + ) 2 the law of X t has a density of class C q. Notice that for small t we are not able to prove that a density exists and we have to wait for a sufficiently large t in order to obtain a regularization effect. In the paper of Kuli [2] one taes c(t, a, x) = a so α(t, a, x) = g(x) g(x + c(t, a, x)). Then the non degeneracy condition concerns just the drift coefficient g. And in the paper of Ishiawa and Kunita the basic example (which corresponds to the geometric Lévy process) is c(t, a, x) = xa(e a ) and g constant. So α(t, a, x) = a(e a ) a 2 as a 0. The drift coefficient does not contribute to the non degeneracy condition (which is analogous to the uniform ellipticity condition). The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we give an integration by parts formula of Malliavin type. This is analogous to the integration by parts formulas given in [2] and []. But there are two specific points: first of all the integration by parts formula tae into account the border terms (in the above mentioned papers the border terms cancel because one maes use of some weights which are null on the border; but in the paper of Kuli [2] such border terms appear as well). The second point is that we use here a one shot integration by parts formula: in the classical gaussian Malliavin calculus one employs all the noise which is available - so one derives an infinite dimensional differential calculus based on all the increments of the Brownian motion. The analogous approach in the case of Poisson point measures is to use all the noise which comes from the random structure (jumps). And this is the point of view of almost all the papers on this topic. But in our paper we use just one jump time which is chosen in a cleaver way (according to the non degeneracy condition). In Section 3 we apply the general integration by parts formula to stochastic equations with jumps. The basic noise is given by the jump times.
4 4 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément.2 Integration by parts formula.2. Notations-derivative operators The abstract framewor is quite similar to the one developed in Bally and Clément [2] but we introduce here some modifications in order to tae into account the border terms appearing in the integration by parts formula. We consider a sequence of random variables (V i ) i N on a probability space (Ω, F, P ), a sub σ-algebra G F and a random variable J, G measurable, with values in N. Our aim is to establish a differential calculus based on the variables (V i ), conditionally on G. In order to derive an integration by parts formula, we need some assumptions on the random variables (V i ). The main hypothesis is that conditionally on G, the law of V i admits a locally smooth density with respect to the Lebesgue measure. H0. i) Conditionally on G, the random variables (V i ) i J are independent and for each i {,..., J} the law of V i is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure. We note p i the conditional density. ii) For all i {,..., J}, there exist some G measurable random variables a i and b i such that < a i < b i < +, (a i, b i ) {p i > 0}. We also assume that p i admits a continuous bounded derivative on (a i, b i ) and that ln p i is bounded on (a i, b i ). We define now the class of functions on which this differential calculus will apply. We consider in this paper functions f : Ω R N R which can be written as f(ω, v) = f m (ω, v,..., v m ) {J(ω)=m} (.3) m= where f m : Ω R m R are G B(R m ) measurable functions. In the following, we fix L N and we will perform integration by parts L times. But we will use another set of variables for each integration by parts. So for l L, we fix a set of indices I l {,..., J} such that if l l, I l I l =. In order to do l integration by parts, we will use successively the variables V i, i I l then the variables V i, i I l and end with V i, i I. Moreover, given l we fix a partition (Λ l,i ) i Il of Ω such that the sets Λ l,i G, i I l. If ω Λ l,i, we will use only the variable V i in our integration by parts. With these notations, we define our basic spaces. We consider in this paper random variables F = f(ω, V ) where V = (V i ) i and f is given by (.3). To simplify the notation we write F = f J (ω, V,..., V J ) so that conditionally on G we have J = m and F = f m (ω, V,..., V m ). We denote by S 0 the space of random variables F = f J (ω, V,..., V J ) where f J is a continuous function on O J = J i= (a i, b i ) such that there exists a G measurable random variable C satisfying sup f J (ω, v) C(ω) < + a.e. (.4) v O J
5 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 5 We also assume that f J has left limits (respectively right limits) in a i (respectively in b i ). Let us be more precise. With the notations V (i) = (V,..., V i, V i+,..., V J ), (V (i), v i ) = (V,..., V i, v i, V i+,..., V J ), for v i (a i, b i ) our assumption is that the following limits exist and are finite: lim f J (ω, V (i), a i + ε) := F (a + ε 0 i ), lim f J (ω, V (i), b i ε) := F (b ε 0 i ). (.5) Now for, S (I l ) denotes the space of random variables F = f J (ω, V,..., V J ) S 0, such that f J admits partial derivatives up to order with respect to the variables v i, i I l and these partial derivatives belong to S 0. We are now able to define our differential operators. The derivative operators. We define D l : S (I l ) S 0 (I l ) : by D l F := OJ (V ) i I l Λl,i (ω) vi f(ω, V ), where O J = J i= (a i, b i ). The divergence operators We note p (l) = i I l Λl,i p i, (.6) and we define δ l : S (I l ) S 0 (I l ) by δ l (F ) = D l F + F D l ln p (l) = OJ (V ) i I l Λl,i ( vi F + F vi ln p i ) We can easily see that if F, U S (I l ) we have δ l (F U) = F δ l (U) + UD l F. (.7) The border terms (.5) ) Let U S 0 (I l ). We define (using the notation [U] l = i I l Λl,i OJ,i (V (i) )((Up i )(b i ) (Up i)(a + i )) with O J,i = j J,j i (a j, b j )
6 6 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément.2.2 Duality and basic integration by parts formula In our framewor the duality between δ l and D l is given by the following proposition. In the sequel, we denote by E G the conditional expectation with respect to the sigma-algebra G. Proposition. Assuming H0 then F, U S (I l ) we have E G (UD l F ) = E G (F δ l (U)) + E G [F U] l. (.8) For simplicity, we assume in this proposition that the random variables F and U tae values in R but such a result can easily be extended to R d value random variables. Proof. We have E G (UD l F ) = i I l Λl,i E G OJ (V )( vi f J (ω, V )u J (ω, V )). From H0 we obtain E G OJ (V )( vi f J (ω, V )u J (ω, V )) = E G OJ,i (V (i) ) bi By using the classical integration by parts formula, we have a i vi (f J )u J p i (v i )dv i. bi a i bi vi (f J )u J p i (v i )dv i = [f J u J p i ] bi a i f J vi (u J p i )dv i. a i Observing that vi (u J p i ) = ( vi (u J ) + u J vi (ln p i ))p i, we have E G ( OJ (V ) vi f J u J ) = E G OJ,i [(V (i) )f J u J p i ] bi a i E G OJ (V )F ( vi (U) + U vi (ln p i )) and the proposition is proved. We can now state a first integration by parts formula. Proposition 2. Let H0 hold true and let F S 2 (I l ), G S (I l ) and Φ : R R be a bounded function with bounded derivative. We assume that F = f J (ω, V ) satisfies the condition min i I l where γ is G measurable and we define on {γ > 0} then inf vi f J (ω, v) γ(ω), (.9) v O J (D l F ) = OJ (V ) i I l Λl,i vi f(ω, V ), {γ>0} E G (Φ () (F )G) = {γ>0} E G (Φ(F )H l (F, G)) + {γ>0} E G [Φ(F )G(D l F ) ] l (.0)
7 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 7 with H l (F, G) = δ l (G(D l F ) ) = Gδ l ((D l F ) ) + D l G(D l F ). (.) Proof. We observe that D l Φ(F ) = OJ (V ) Λl,i vi Φ(F ) = OJ (V )Φ () (F ) Λl,i vi F, i I l i I l so that D l Φ(F ).D l F = Φ () (F )(D l F ) 2, and then {γ>0} Φ () (F ) = {γ>0} D l Φ(F ).(D l F ). Now since F S 2 (I l ), we deduce that (D l F ) S (I l ) on {γ > 0} and applying Proposition with U = G(D l F ) we obtain the result..2.3 Iterations of the integration by parts formula We will iterate the integration by parts formula given in Proposition 2. We recall that if we iterate l times the integration by parts formula, we will integrate by parts successively with respect to the variables (V i ) i I for l. In order to give some estimates of the weights appearing in these formulas we introduce the following norm on S l ( l = I ), for l L. F l = F + where. is defined on S 0 by l = l <...<l l F = sup v O J f J (ω, v). D l... D l F, (.2) For l = 0, we set F 0 = F. We remar that we have for l <... < l l D l... D l F = i I l,...,i I l ( Λlj,i j ) vi... vi F, and since for each l (Λ l,i ) i Il is a partition of Ω, for ω fixed, the preceding sum has only one term not equal to zero. This family of norms satisfies for F S l+ ( l+ = I ) : j= F l+ = D l+ F l + F l so D l+ F l F l+. (.3)
8 8 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément Moreover it is easy to chec that if F, G S l ( l = I ) F G l C l F l G l, (.4) where C l is a constant depending on l. Finally for any function φ C l (R, R) we have φ(f ) l C l l =0 φ () (F ) F l C l max 0 l φ() (F ) ( + F l l). (.5) With these notations we can iterate the integration by parts formula. Theorem. Let H0 hold true and let Φ : R R be a bounded function with bounded derivatives up to order L. Let F = f J (w, V ) S ( L l= I l) such that inf i {,...,J} inf vi f J (ω, v) γ(ω), γ [0, ] Gmeasurable (.6) v O J then we have for l {,..., L}, G S l ( l = I ) and F S l+ ( l = I ) {γ>0} E G Φ (l) (F )G C l Φ {γ>0} E G ( G l ( + p 0 ) l Π l (F ) ) (.7) where Φ = sup x Φ(x), p 0 = max l=,...,l p (l), C l is a constant depending on l and Π l (F ) is defined on {γ > 0} by Π l (F ) = l ( + (D F ) )( + δ ((D F ) ) ). (.8) = Moreover we have the bound Π l (F ) C l ( + ln p ) l γ l(l+2) l ( + F = where ln p = max i=,...,j (ln p i ). + D F ) 2, (.9) Proof. We proceed by induction. For l =, we have from Proposition 2 since G S (I ) and F S 2 (I ) {γ>0} E G (Φ () (F )G) = {γ>0} E G (Φ(F )H (F, G)) We have on {γ > 0} + {γ>0} E G [Φ(F )G(D F ) ]. (.20) H (F, G) G δ ((D F ) ) + D G (D F ), ( G + D G )( + (D F ) )( + δ ((D F ) ) ), = G ( + (D F ) 0 )( + δ ((D F ) ) 0 ). Turning to the border term [Φ(F )G(D F ) ], we chec that
9 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 9 [Φ(F )G(D F ) ] 2 Φ G i I Λ,i vi F i I Λ,i p i, 2 Φ G 0 (D F ) 0 p 0. This proves the result for l =. Now assume that Theorem is true for l and let us prove it for l+. By assumption we have G S l+ ( l+ = I ) S (I l+ ) and F S l+2 ( l+ = I ) S 2 (I l+ ). Consequently we can apply Proposition 2 on I l+. This gives ) {γ>0} E G (Φ (l+) (F )G) = {γ>0} E G (Φ (l) (F )H l+ (F, G) + {γ>0} E G [Φ (l) (F )G(D l+ F ) ] l+, (.2) with H l+ (F, G) = Gδ l+ ((D l+ F ) ) + D l+ G(D l+ F ), [Φ (l) (F )G(D l+ F ) ] l+ = ( Λl+,i OJ,i (V (i) ) (Φ (l) (F )G vi F p i)(b i ) i I l+ (Φ (l) (F )G ) vi F p i)(a + i ). We easily see that H l+ (F, G) S l ( l = I ) and so using the induction hypothesis we obtain {γ>0} E G Φ (l) (F )H l+ (F, G) C l Φ {γ>0} E G H l+ (F, G) l (+ p 0 ) l Π l (F ), and we just have to bound H l+ (F, G) l on {γ > 0}. But using successively (.4) and (.3) H l+ (F, G) l C l ( G l δ l+ ((D l+ F ) ) l + D l+ G l (D l+ F ) ) l, C l G l+ ( + (D l+ F ) ) l )( + δ l+ ((D l+ F ) ) l ). This finally gives E G Φ (l) (F )H l+ (F, G) C l Φ E G G l+ ( + p 0 ) l Π l+ (F ). (.22) So we just have to prove a similar inequality for E G [Φ (l) (F )G(D l+ F ) ] l+. This reduces to consider i I l+ Λl+,i p i (b i )E G OJ,i (V (i) )(Φ (l) (F )G vi F )(b i ) (.23) since the other term can be treated similarly. Consequently we just have to bound E G OJ,i (V (i) )(Φ (l) (F )G vi F )(b i ).
10 0 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément Since all variables satisfy (.4), we obtain from Lebesgue Theorem, using the notation (.5) E G OJ,i (V (i) )(Φ (l) (F )G vi F )(b i ) = lim E G OJ,i (V (i) )(Φ (l) (f J (V (i), b i ε))(g J ε 0 vi f J )(V (i), b i ε). To shorten the notation we write simply F (b i ε) = f J (V (i), b i ε). Now one can prove that if U S l ( l+ = I ) for l l then i I l+, U(b i ε) S l ( l = I ) and U(b i ε) l U l. We deduce then that i I l+ F (b i ε) S l+ ( l = I ) and that (G vi F )(b i ε) S l ( l = I ) and from induction hypothesis E G (Φ (l) (F (b i ε)) OJ,i (G vi F )(b i ε) C l Φ E G { G(b i ε) l vi F (b i ε) l ( + p 0 ) l Π l (F (b i ε))}, C l Φ E G G l vi F l( + p 0 ) l Π l (F ). Putting this in (.23) we obtain E G Λl+,i OJ,i (Φ (l) (F )G vi F p i)(b i ) C l Φ E G { G l ( + p 0 ) l Π l (F ) i I l+ Finally plugging (.22) and (.24) in (.2) Λl+,i p i vi F l}, i I l+ C l Φ E G { G l ( + p 0 ) l+ Π l (F ) (D l+ F ) l }. (.24) E G (Φ (l+) (F )G) C l Φ ( EG G l+ ( + p 0 ) l Π l+ (F ) +E G G l ( + p 0 ) l+ Π l (F ) (D l+ F ) l ), C l Φ E G G l+ ( + p 0 ) l+ Π l+ (F ), and inequality (.7) is proved for l +. This achieves the first part of the proof of Theorem. It remains to prove (.9). We assume that ω {γ > 0}. Let l. We first notice that combining (.3) and (.4) we obtain δ (F ) F ( + D ln p () ), since p () only depends on the variables V i, i I. So we deduce the bound Now we have δ ((D F ) ) (D F ) ( + ln p ). (.25)
11 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s From (.5) with φ(x) = /x and consequently (D F ) = Λ,i vi F i I vi F ( + F ) C γ, (D F ) C ( + F ) γ. (.26) Moreover we have using successively (.3) and (.26) Putting this in (.25) (D F ) = (D ( F ) + D (D F ), (+ F ) ) C + (+ D F γ ), γ + (+ F C + D F ) γ +. δ ((D F ) ) ( + F + D F ) C γ + ( + ln p ). (.27) Finally from (.26) and (.27), we deduce Π l (F ) C l ( + ln p ) l γ l(l+2) l ( + F = + D F ) 2, and Theorem is proved..3 Stochastic equations with jumps.3. Notations and hypotheses We consider a Poisson point process p with measurable state space (E, B(E)). We refer to Ieda and Watanabe [9] for the notation. We denote by N the counting measure associated to p so N t (A) := N((0, t) A) = #{s < t; p s A}. The intensity measure is dt dµ(a) where µ is a sigma-finite measure on (E, B(E)) and we fix a non decreasing sequence (E n ) of subsets of E such that E = n E n, µ(e n ) < and µ(e n+ ) µ(e n ) + K for all n and for a constant K > 0. We consider the one dimensional stochastic equation
12 2 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément X t = x + c(s, a, X s )dn(s, a) + g(s, X s )ds. (.28) 0 E 0 Our aim is to give sufficient conditions on the coefficients c and g in order to prove that the law of X t is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure and has a smooth density. We mae the following assumptions on the coefficients c and g. H. We assume that the functions c and g are infinitely differentiable with respect to the variables (t, x) and that there exist a bounded function c and a constant g, such that (t, a, x) c(t, a, x) c(a)( + x ), sup t l xc(t, l a, x) c(a); l+l (t, x) g(t, x) g( + x ), sup t l xg(t, l x) g; l+l We assume moreover that c(a)dµ(a) <. E Under H, equation (.28) admits a unique solution. H2. We assume that there exists a measurable function ĉ : E R + such that ĉ(a)dµ(a) < and E (t, a, x) x c(t, a, x)( + x c(t, a, x)) ĉ(a). To simplify the notation we tae ĉ = c. Under H2, the tangent flow associated to (.28) is invertible. At last we give a non-degeneracy condition wich will imply (.6). We denote by α the function α(t, a, x) = g(t, x) g(t, x + c(t, a, x)) + (g x c + t c)(t, a, x). (.29) H3. We assume that there exists a measurable function α : E R + such that (t, a, x) α(t, a, x) α(a) > 0, n dµ(a) < and lim inf E n α(a) n µ(e n ) ln ( E n α(a) dµ(a) ) = θ <. We give in the following some examples where E = (0, ] and α(a) = a..3.2 Main results and examples Following the methodology introduced in Bally and Clément [2], our aim is to bound the Fourier transform of X t, ˆp Xt (ξ), in terms of / ξ, recalling that if R ξ q ˆp Xt (ξ) dξ <, for q > 0, then the law of X t is absolutely continuous and its density is C [q]. This is done in the next proposition. The proof of this
13 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 3 proposition relies on an approximation of X t which will be given in the next section. Proposition 3. Assuming H, H2 and H3 we have for all n, L N ( ˆp Xt (ξ) C t,l e µ(en)t/(2l) + ) ξ L A n,l, with A n,l = µ(e n ) L ( E n α(a) dµ(a))l(l+2). From this proposition, we deduce our main result. Theorem 2. We assume that H, H2 and H3 hold. Let q N, then for t > 6θ(q + 2)(q + ) 2, the law of X t is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure and its density is of class C q. In particular if θ = 0, the law of X t is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure and its density is of class C for every t > 0. Proof. From Proposition 3, we have ( ˆp Xt (ξ) C t,l e µ(en)t/2l + ) ξ L A n,l. Now, 0 > 0, if t/2l > θ, we deduce from H3 that for n n L t/2l > µ(e n ) ln( E n α(a) dµ(a)) + ln µ(e n) 0 µ(e n ) since the second term on the right hand side tends to zero. This implies e µ(en)t/2l > ( E n α(a) dµ(a)) µ(e n ) /0. Choosing = L(L + 2) and / 0 = L, we obtain that for n n L and t/2l > L(L + 2)θ e µ(en)t/2l > A n,l. and then ) ˆp Xt (ξ) C t,l (e µ(en)t/2l + e µ(en)t/2l, ξ L C t,l ( B + Bn(t) n(t) ), ξ L with B n (t) = e µ(en)t/2l. Now recalling that µ(e n ) < µ(e n+ ) K + µ(e n ), we have B n (t) < B n+ (t) K t B n (t). Moreover since B n (t) goes to infinity with n we have { ξ L/2 B nl (t)} = n n L {Bn(t) ξ L/2 <B n+(t)}. But if B n (t) ξ L/2 < B n+ (t), ˆp Xt (ξ) C t,l / ξ L/2 and so
14 4 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément ξ q ˆp Xt (ξ) dξ = ξ L/2 <B nl(t) ξ q ˆp Xt (ξ) dξ + ξ L/2 B nl (t) ξ q ˆp Xt (ξ) dξ, C t,l,nl + ξ L/2 B nl (t) ξ q L/2 dξ. For q N, choosing L such that L/2 q >, we obtain ξ q ˆp Xt (ξ) dξ < for t/2l > L(L + 2)θ and consequently the law of X t admits a density C q for t > 2L 2 (L + 2)θ and L > 2(q + ), that is t > 6θ(q + ) 2 (q + 2) and Theorem 2 is proved. We end this section with two examples Example. We tae E = (0, ], µ λ = δ λ / with 0 < λ < and E n = [/n, ]. We have n E n = E, µ(e n ) = n = and µ λ λ (E n+ ) µ λ (E n )+. We consider the process (X t ) solution of (.28) with c(t, a, x) = a and g(t, x) = g(x) assuming that the derivatives of g are bounded and that g (x) g > 0. We have E adµ λ(a) = < so H and H2 hold. λ+ Moreover α(t, a, x) = g(x) g(x + a) so α(a) = ga. Now E n a dµ λ(a) = n = λ which is equivalent as n go to infinity to n 2 λ /(2 λ). Now we have µ λ (E n ) ln ( E n α(a) dµ λ(a) ) = ln(g n = λ ) n = n C ln(n2 λ ) n λ 0, λ and then H3 is satisfied with θ = 0. We conclude from Theorem 2 that t > 0, X t admits a density C. In the case λ =, we have µ (E n ) = n = n ln n then ( ) µ (E n ) ln E n α(a) dµ (a) = ln(g n = ) n, n = and this gives H3 with θ =. So the density of X t is regular as soon as t is large enough. In fact it is proved in Kuli [2] that under some appropriate conditions the density of X t is not continuous for small t. Example 2. We tae the intensity measure µ λ as in the previous example and we consider the process (X t ) solution of (.28) with g = and c(t, a, x) = ax. This gives c(a) = a and α(a) = a. So the conclusions are similar to example in both cases 0 < λ < and λ =. But in this example we can compare our result to the one given by Ichiawa and Kunita [0]. They assume the condition lim inf u 0 for some h (0, 2). Here we have a u u h a 2 dµ(a) > 0, a u a 2 dµ(a) = /u 2+λ u 0 ( ) u +λ + λ.
15 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 5 So if 0 < λ <, ( ) holds and their results apply. In the case λ =, ( ) fails and they do not conclude. However in our approach we conclude that the density of X t is C q for t > 6(q + 2)(q + ) 2. The next section is devoted to the proof of Proposition Approximation of X t and integration by parts formula In order to bound the Fourier transform of the process X t solution of (.28), we will apply the differential calculus developed in section 2. The first step consists in an approximation of X t by a random variable Xt N which can be viewed as an element of our basic space S 0. We assume that the process (Xt N ) is solution of the discrete version of equation (.28) X N t = x + 0 c(s, a, Xs N )dn(s, a) + E N 0 g(s, X N s )ds. (.30) Since µ(e N ) <, the number of jumps of the process X N on the interval (0, t) is finite and consequently we may consider the random variable Xt N as a function of these jump times and apply the methodology proposed in section 2. We denote by (Jt N ) the Poisson process defined by Jt N = N((0, t), E N ) = #{s < t; p s E N } and we note (T N) its jump times. We also introduce the notation N = p T N. With these notations, the process solution of (.30) can be written Jt N Xt N = x + c(t N, N, X N T N ) + g(s, Xs N )ds. (.3) = We will not wor with all the variables (T N) but only with the jump times (T n) of the Poisson process J t n, where n < N. In the following we will eep n fixed and we will mae N go to infinity. We note (T N,n ) the jump times of the Poisson process J N,n t = N((0, t), E N \E n ) and n,n = p T n,n. Now we fix L N, the number of integration by parts and we note t l = tl/l, 0 l L. Assuming that Jt n l Jt n l = m l for l L, we denote by (Tl,i n ) i m l the jump times of Jt n belonging to the time interval (t l, t l ). In the following we assume that m l, l. For i = 0 we set Tl,0 n = t l and for i = m l +, Tl,m n l + = t l. With these definitions we choose our basic variables (V i, i I l ) as (V i, i I l ) = (Tl,2i+, n 0 i [(m l )/2]). (.32) The σ-algebra which contains the noise which is not involved in our differential calculus is 0
16 6 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément G = σ{(j n t l ) l L ; (T n l,2i) 2i ml, l L; (T N,n ) ; ( N ) }. (.33) Using some well nown results on Poisson processes, we easily see that conditionally on G the variables (V i ) are independent and for i I l the law of V i conditionally on G is uniform on (Tl,2i n, T l,2i+2 n ) and we have p i (v) = Tl,2i+2 n T l,2i n (T n l,2i,tl,2i+2 n ) (v), i I l, (.34) Consequently taing a i = Tl,2i n and b i = Tl,2i+2 n we chec that hypothesis H0 holds. It remains to define the localizing sets (Λ l,i ) i Il. We denote h n l = t l t l = t 2m l 2Lm l and n l = [(m l )/2]. We will wor on the G measurable set Λ n l = n l i=0 {T n l,2i+2 T n l,2i h n l }, (.35) and we consider the following partition of this set: Λ l,0 = {T n l,2 T n l,0 h n l }, Λ l,i = i ={T n l,2 T n l,2 2 < h n l } {T n l,2i+2 T n l,2i h n l }, i =,..., n l. After L l iterations of the integration by parts we will wor with the variables V i, i I l so the corresponding derivative is D l F = i I l Λl,i Vi F = i I l Λl,i T n l,2i+ F. If we are on Λ n l then we have at least one i such that t l Tl,2i n < Tl,2i+ n < T l,2i+2 n t l and Tl,2i+2 n T l,2i n h n l. Notice that in this case Λl,i p i (h n l ) and roughly speaing this means that the variable V i = Tl,2i+ n gives a sufficiently large quantity of noise. Moreover, in order to perform L integrations by parts we will wor on Γ n L = L l=λ n l (.36) and we will leave out the complementary of ΓL n. The following lemma says that on the set ΓL n we have enough noise and that the complementary of this set may be ignored. Lemma. Using the notation given in Theorem one has i) p 0 := max l L i I l Λl,i p i 2L t J n t, ii) P ((Γ n L )c ) L exp( µ(e n )t/2l). Proof. As mentioned before Λl,i p i (h n l ) = 2Lm l /t 2L t J t n and so we have i). In order to prove ii) we have to estimate P ((Λ n l )c ) for l L.
17 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 7 We denote s l = 2 (t l + t l ) and we will prove that {Jt n l Js n l } Λ n l. Suppose first that m l = Jt n l Jt n l is even. Then 2n l + 2 = m l. If Tl,2i+2 n T l,2i n < hn l for every i = 0,..., n l then T n l,m l t l = n l i=0 (T n l,2i+2 T n l,2i) (n l + ) t t 2Lm l 4L s l t l so there are no jumps in (s l, t l ). Suppose now that m l is odd so 2n l +2 = m l + and Tl,2n n l +2 = t l. If we have Tl,2i+2 n T l,2i n < hn l for every i = 0,..., n l, then we deduce n l i=0 (T n l,2i+2 T n l,2i) < (n l + ) t < m l + t 2Lm l 4L m l t 2L, and there are no jumps in (s l, t l ). So we have proved that {Jt n l Js n l } Λ n l and since P (Jt n l Js n l = 0) = exp( µ(e n )t/2l) the inequality ii) follows. Now we will apply Theorem, with F N = Xt N, G = and Φ ξ (x) = e iξx. So we have to chec that F N S L+ ( L l= I l) and that condition (.6) holds. Moreover we have to bound F N l l and D l F N l l, for l L. This needs some preliminary lemma. Lemma 2. Let v = (v i ) i 0 be a positive non increasing sequence with v 0 = 0 and (a i ) i a sequence of E. We define J t (v) by J t (v) = v i if v i t < v i+ and we consider the process solution of J t X t = x + c(v, a, X v ) + = 0 g(s, X s )ds. (.37) We assume that H holds. Then X t admits some derivatives with respect to v i and if we note U i (t) = vi X t and W i (t) = v 2 i X t, the processes (U i (t)) t vi and (W i (t)) t vi solve respectively J t U i (t) = α(v i, a i, X vi )+ x c(v, a, X v )U i (v )+ x g(s, X s )U i (s)ds, =i+ v i (.38) J t W i (t) = β i (t) + x c(v, a, X v )W i (v ) + x g(s, X s )W i (s)ds, v i with =i+ α(t, a, x) = g(t, x) g(t, x + c(t, a, x)) + g(t, x) x c(t, a, x) + t c(t, a, x), (.39) β i (t) = t α(v i, a i, X vi ) + x α(v i, a i, X vi )g(v i, X vi ) x g(v i, X vi )U i (v i ) + J t =i+ 2 xc(v, a, X v )(U i (v )) 2 + v i xg(s, 2 X s )(U i (s)) 2 ds.
18 8 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément Proof. If s < v i, we have vi X s = 0. Now we have and consequently v i vi X vi = x + c(v, a, X v ) + g(s, X s )ds, 0 For t > v i, we observe that this gives X t = X vi + = vi X vi = g(v i, X vi ). J t =v i c(v, a, X v ) + v i g(s, X s )ds, vi X t = g(v i, X vi ) + g(v i, X vi ) x c(v i, a i, X vi ) + t c(v i, a i, X vi ) g(v i, X vi ) + J t =i+ xc(v, a, X v ) vi X v + v i x g(s, X s ) vi X s ds. Remaring that X vi = X vi + c(v i, a i, X vi ), we obtain (.38). The proof of (.39) is similar and we omit it. We give next a bound for X t and its derivatives with respect to the variables (v i ). Lemma 3. Let (X t ) be the process solution of (.37). We assume that H holds and we note J t n t (c) = c(a ). Then we have: = sup X t C t ( + n t (c))e nt(c). s t Moreover l, there exist some constants C t,l and C l such that (v i ) i=,...,l with t > v l, we have sup v... vl U l (s) + sup v... vl W l (s) v l s t v l s t C t,l ( + n t (c)) C l e C ln t(c). We observe that the previous bound does not depend on the variables (v i ). Proof. We just give a setch of the proof. We first remar that the process (e t ) solution of J t e t = + c(a )e v + g e s ds, = 0
19 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 9 is given by e t = J t = ( + c(a ))e gt. Now from H, we deduce for s t X s x + J s = c(a )( + X v ) + s 0 g( + X u )du, x + J t = c(a ) + gt + J s = c(a ) X v + s ( x + J t = c(a ) + gt)e s 0 g X u du, where the last inequality follows from Gronwall lemma. Then using the previous remar sup s t J t X s C t ( + n t (c)) ( + c(a )) C t ( + n t (c))e nt(c). (.40) = We chec easily that α(t, a, x) C( + x )c(a), and we get successively from (.38) and (.40) sup U l (s) C t (+ X vl )c(a l )(+n t (c))e nt(c) C t (+n t (c)) 2 e 2nt(c). v l s t Putting this in (.39), we obtain a similar bound for sup vl s t W l (s) and we end the proof of Lemma 3 by induction since we can derive equations for the higher order derivatives of U l (s) and W l (s) analogous to (.39). We come bac to the process (Xt N ) solution of (.30). We recall that F N = Xt N and we will chec that F N satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem. Lemma 4. i) We assume that H holds. Then l, C t,l, C l independent of N such that F N l + D l F N l C t,l (( + N t (c))e Nt(c)) C l, with N t (c) = c(a)dn(s, a). 0 E ii) Moreover if we assume in addition that H2 and H3 hold and that m l = Jt n l Jt n l, l {,..., L} then we have l L, i I l and (.6) holds. Vi F N ( e 2Nt(c) N t ( En /α)) := γn We remar that on the non degeneracy set ΓL n given by (.36) we have at least one jump on (t l, t l ), that is m l, l {,..., L}. Moreover we have ΓL n {γ n > 0}. Proof. The proof of i) is a straightforward consequence of Lemma 3, replacing n t (c) by J N t p= c( N p ) and observing that
20 20 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément Jt N c( N p ) = p= 0 E N c(a)dn(s, a) Turning to ii) we have from Lemma 2 N Jt T N Xt N = α(t N, N, X N T N ) + p=+ 0 E c(a)dn(s, a) = N t (c). x c(t N p, N p, X N T N p ) T N XN T N p + T N x g(s, X N s ) T N X s ds. Assuming H2, we define (Y N t ) t and (Z N t ) t as the solutions of the equations Y N t Z N t = + J N t p= xc(tp N, N p, X N Tp N )Y T N + 0 xg(s, Xs N )Ys N = J N xc(t N p, N p,xn T t p N ) p= + xc(tp N, N p,xn Tp N )Z T N 0 xg(s, Xs N )Zs N ds. ds, We have Y N t Z N t =, t 0 and Yt N e tg e Nt( E c) N e Nt(c), Zt N = e Nt(c). Now one can easily chec that Y N t T N Xt N = α(t N, N, X N T N )Y t N Z N T, N and using H3 and the preceding bound it yields T N X N t e 2Nt(c) α( N ). Recalling that we do not consider the derivatives with respect to all the variables (T N) but only with respect to (V i) = (Tl,2i+ n ) l,i with n < N fixed, we have l L and i I l J n t Vi Xt N e 2Nt(c) ( α( n = e 2Nt(c) N t ( En /α)), p ) and Lemma 4 is proved. p= With this lemma we are at last able to prove Proposition 3. Proof. From Theorem we have since Γ n L {γ n > 0} Γ n L E G Φ (L) (F N ) C L Φ Γ n L E G ( + p 0 ) L Π L (F N ).
21 Integration by parts formula with respect to jump times for SDE s 2 Now from Lemma i) we have p 0 2LJ n t /t and moreover we can chec that ln p = 0. So we deduce from Lemma 4 This finally gives Π L (F N ) C ( t,l ( + Nt (c))e Nt(c)) C L γn L(L+2) C t,l N t ( En /α) ( L(L+2) ( + N t (c))e Nt(c)) C L. E Γ n L Φ (L) (F N ) Φ C t,l E ( (J N t ) L N t ( En /α) L(L+2) (( + N t (c))e Nt(c)) C L ). (.4) Now we now from a classical computation (see for example [2]) that the Laplace transform of N t (f) satisfies Ee snt(f) = e tα f (s), α f (s) = ( e sf(a) )dµ(a). (.42) From H, we have c(a)dµ(a) <, so we deduce using (.42) with f = c E that, q > 0 ( E ( + N t (c))e Nt(c)) q Ct,q <. Since J n t is a Poisson process with intensity tµ(e n ), we have q > 0 E E(J n t ) q C t,q µ(e n ) q. Finally, using once again (.42) with f = En /α we see easily that q > 0 ( ) q EN t ( En /α) q C t,q E n α(a) dµ(a). Turning bac to (.4) and combining Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the previous bounds we deduce ( ) L(L+2) E Γ n L Φ (L) (F N ) Φ C t,l µ(e n ) L E n α(a) dµ(a) = Φ C t,l A n,l. (.43) We are now ready to give a bound for ˆp X N t (ξ). We have ˆp X N t (ξ) = EΦ ξ (F N ), with Φ ξ (x) = e iξx. Since Φ (L) ξ (x) = (iξ) L Φ ξ (x), we can write ˆp X N t (ξ) = EΦ (L) ξ (F N ) / ξ L and consequently we deduce from (.43)
22 22 Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément ˆp X N t (ξ) P ((ΓL n ) c ) + C t,l A n,l / ξ L. But from Lemma ii) we have P ((ΓL n ) c ) Le µ(en)t/(2l) and finally ˆp X N t (ξ) C L,t (e µ(en)t/(2l) + A n,l / ξ L). We achieve the proof of Proposition 3 by letting N go to infinity, eeping n fixed. References. Vlad Bally, Marie-Pierre Bavouzet, and Marouen Messaoud. Integration by parts formula for locally smooth laws and applications to sensitivity computations. Ann. Appl. Probab., 7():33 66, Vlad Bally and Emmanuelle Clément. Integration by parts formula and applications to equations with jumps. Preprint, Klaus Bichteler, Jean-Bernard Gravereaux, and Jean Jacod. Malliavin calculus for processes with jumps, volume 2 of Stochastics Monographs. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New Yor, Jean-Michel Bismut. Calcul des variations stochastique et processus de sauts. Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete, 63(2):47 235, Eric A. Carlen and Étienne Pardoux. Differential calculus and integration by parts on Poisson space. In Stochastics, algebra and analysis in classical and quantum dynamics (Marseille, 988), volume 59 of Math. Appl., pages Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, L. Denis. A criterion of density for solutions of Poisson-driven SDEs. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 8(3): , Robert J. Elliott and Allanus H. Tsoi. Integration by parts for Poisson processes. J. Multivariate Anal., 44(2):79 90, Nicolas Fournier. Smoothness of the law of some one-dimensional jumping S.D.E.s with non-constant rate of jump. Electron. J. Probab., 3:no. 6, 35 56, Nobuyui Ieda and Shinzo Watanabe. Stochastic differential equations and diffusion processes, volume 24 of North-Holland Mathematical Library. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, second edition, Yasushi Ishiawa and Hiroshi Kunita. Malliavin calculus on the Wiener-Poisson space and its application to canonical SDE with jumps. Stochastic Process. Appl., 6(2): , Alexey M. Kuli. Malliavin calculus for Lévy processes with arbitrary Lévy measures. Teor. Ĭmovīr. Mat. Stat., (72):67 83, Alexey M. Kuli. Stochastic calculus of variations for general Lévy processes and its applications to jump-type SDE s with non degenerated drift. Preprint, Ivan Nourdin and Thomas Simon. On the absolute continuity of Lévy processes with drift. Ann. Probab., 34(3):035 05, Jean Picard. On the existence of smooth densities for jump processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields, 05(4):48 5, 996.
THE LENT PARTICLE FORMULA
THE LENT PARTICLE FORMULA Nicolas BOULEAU, Laurent DENIS, Paris. Workshop on Stochastic Analysis and Finance, Hong-Kong, June-July 2009 This is part of a joint work with Laurent Denis, concerning the approach
More informationTHE MALLIAVIN CALCULUS FOR SDE WITH JUMPS AND THE PARTIALLY HYPOELLIPTIC PROBLEM
Takeuchi, A. Osaka J. Math. 39, 53 559 THE MALLIAVIN CALCULUS FOR SDE WITH JUMPS AND THE PARTIALLY HYPOELLIPTIC PROBLEM ATSUSHI TAKEUCHI Received October 11, 1. Introduction It has been studied by many
More informationInverse Brascamp-Lieb inequalities along the Heat equation
Inverse Brascamp-Lieb inequalities along the Heat equation Franck Barthe and Dario Cordero-Erausquin October 8, 003 Abstract Adapting Borell s proof of Ehrhard s inequality for general sets, we provide
More informationConvergence at first and second order of some approximations of stochastic integrals
Convergence at first and second order of some approximations of stochastic integrals Bérard Bergery Blandine, Vallois Pierre IECN, Nancy-Université, CNRS, INRIA, Boulevard des Aiguillettes B.P. 239 F-5456
More informationDirichlet Forms for Poisson Measures and Lévy Processes: The Lent Particle Method
Dirichlet Forms for Poisson Measures and Lévy Processes: The Lent Particle Method Nicolas BOULEAU and Laurent DENIS Abstract We present a new approach to absolute continuity of laws of Poisson functionals.
More informationAsymptotic behavior of some weighted quadratic and cubic variations of the fractional Brownian motion
Asymptotic behavior of some weighted quadratic and cubic variations of the fractional Brownian motion Ivan Nourdin To cite this version: Ivan Nourdin. Asymptotic behavior of some weighted quadratic and
More informationA connection between the stochastic heat equation and fractional Brownian motion, and a simple proof of a result of Talagrand
A connection between the stochastic heat equation and fractional Brownian motion, and a simple proof of a result of Talagrand Carl Mueller 1 and Zhixin Wu Abstract We give a new representation of fractional
More informationRandom Fields: Skorohod integral and Malliavin derivative
Dept. of Math. University of Oslo Pure Mathematics No. 36 ISSN 0806 2439 November 2004 Random Fields: Skorohod integral and Malliavin derivative Giulia Di Nunno 1 Oslo, 15th November 2004. Abstract We
More informationGeneralized Gaussian Bridges of Prediction-Invertible Processes
Generalized Gaussian Bridges of Prediction-Invertible Processes Tommi Sottinen 1 and Adil Yazigi University of Vaasa, Finland Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications III September 1, 212, Kyiv, Ukraine
More informationA Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations
A Concise Course on Stochastic Partial Differential Equations Michael Röckner Reference: C. Prevot, M. Röckner: Springer LN in Math. 1905, Berlin (2007) And see the references therein for the original
More informationBERNARD HOST AND BRYNA KRA
UIFORMITY SEMIORMS O l AD A IVERSE THEOREM SUMMARY OF RESULTS BERARD HOST AD BRYA KRA Abstract. For each integer k, we define seminorms on l (Z), analogous to the seminorms defined by the authors on bounded
More informationRegularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation
Regularity of the density for the stochastic heat equation Carl Mueller 1 Department of Mathematics University of Rochester Rochester, NY 15627 USA email: cmlr@math.rochester.edu David Nualart 2 Department
More informationCOVARIANCE IDENTITIES AND MIXING OF RANDOM TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE WIENER SPACE
Communications on Stochastic Analysis Vol. 4, No. 3 (21) 299-39 Serials Publications www.serialspublications.com COVARIANCE IDENTITIES AND MIXING OF RANDOM TRANSFORMATIONS ON THE WIENER SPACE NICOLAS PRIVAULT
More informationLocal null controllability of the N-dimensional Navier-Stokes system with N-1 scalar controls in an arbitrary control domain
Local null controllability of the N-dimensional Navier-Stokes system with N-1 scalar controls in an arbitrary control domain Nicolás Carreño Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 UMR 7598 Laboratoire
More informationON THE PATHWISE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 55 Fasc. 4 1998 ON THE PATHWISE UNIQUENESS OF SOLUTIONS OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS C. Sonoc Abstract: A sufficient condition for uniqueness of solutions of ordinary
More informationInternal Stabilizability of Some Diffusive Models
Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 265, 91 12 (22) doi:1.16/jmaa.21.7694, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Internal Stabilizability of Some Diffusive Models Bedr Eddine
More informationFiltrations, Markov Processes and Martingales. Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition
Filtrations, Markov Processes and Martingales Lectures on Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus, Braunschweig, Lecture 3: The Lévy-Itô Decomposition David pplebaum Probability and Statistics Department,
More informationEULER MARUYAMA APPROXIMATION FOR SDES WITH JUMPS AND NON-LIPSCHITZ COEFFICIENTS
Qiao, H. Osaka J. Math. 51 (14), 47 66 EULER MARUYAMA APPROXIMATION FOR SDES WITH JUMPS AND NON-LIPSCHITZ COEFFICIENTS HUIJIE QIAO (Received May 6, 11, revised May 1, 1) Abstract In this paper we show
More information1 Brownian Local Time
1 Brownian Local Time We first begin by defining the space and variables for Brownian local time. Let W t be a standard 1-D Wiener process. We know that for the set, {t : W t = } P (µ{t : W t = } = ) =
More informationand finally, any second order divergence form elliptic operator
Supporting Information: Mathematical proofs Preliminaries Let be an arbitrary bounded open set in R n and let L be any elliptic differential operator associated to a symmetric positive bilinear form B
More informationRATIO ERGODIC THEOREMS: FROM HOPF TO BIRKHOFF AND KINGMAN
RTIO ERGODIC THEOREMS: FROM HOPF TO BIRKHOFF ND KINGMN HNS HENRIK RUGH ND DMIEN THOMINE bstract. Hopf s ratio ergodic theorem has an inherent symmetry which we exploit to provide a simplification of standard
More informationLAN property for sde s with additive fractional noise and continuous time observation
LAN property for sde s with additive fractional noise and continuous time observation Eulalia Nualart (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona) joint work with Samy Tindel (Purdue University) Vlad s 6th birthday,
More informationProbability approximation by Clark-Ocone covariance representation
Probability approximation by Clark-Ocone covariance representation Nicolas Privault Giovanni Luca Torrisi October 19, 13 Abstract Based on the Stein method and a general integration by parts framework
More informationBOOK REVIEW. Review by Denis Bell. University of North Florida
BOOK REVIEW By Paul Malliavin, Stochastic Analysis. Springer, New York, 1997, 370 pages, $125.00. Review by Denis Bell University of North Florida This book is an exposition of some important topics in
More informationarxiv: v4 [math.pr] 19 Jan 2009
The Annals of Probability 28, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2159 2175 DOI: 1.1214/7-AOP385 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 28 arxiv:75.57v4 [math.pr] 19 Jan 29 ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR OF WEIGHTED QUADRATIC AND CUBIC
More informationMATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, Introduction
1 INTRODUCTION MATHS 730 FC Lecture Notes March 5, 2014 1 Introduction Definition. If A, B are sets and there exists a bijection A B, they have the same cardinality, which we write as A, #A. If there exists
More informationOn a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 10 (2003), No. 2, 517 529 On a Class of Multidimensional Optimal Transportation Problems G. Carlier Université Bordeaux 1, MAB, UMR CNRS 5466, France and Université Bordeaux
More informationSome Properties of NSFDEs
Chenggui Yuan (Swansea University) Some Properties of NSFDEs 1 / 41 Some Properties of NSFDEs Chenggui Yuan Swansea University Chenggui Yuan (Swansea University) Some Properties of NSFDEs 2 / 41 Outline
More informationOn pathwise stochastic integration
On pathwise stochastic integration Rafa l Marcin Lochowski Afican Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Warsaw School of Economics UWC seminar Rafa l Marcin Lochowski (AIMS, WSE) On pathwise stochastic
More informationMean-field SDE driven by a fractional BM. A related stochastic control problem
Mean-field SDE driven by a fractional BM. A related stochastic control problem Rainer Buckdahn, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest Durham Symposium on Stochastic Analysis, July 1th to July 2th,
More informationThe Lévy-Itô decomposition and the Lévy-Khintchine formula in31 themarch dual of 2014 a nuclear 1 space. / 20
The Lévy-Itô decomposition and the Lévy-Khintchine formula in the dual of a nuclear space. Christian Fonseca-Mora School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Sheffield, UK Talk at "Stochastic Processes
More informationAlmost sure limit theorems for U-statistics
Almost sure limit theorems for U-statistics Hajo Holzmann, Susanne Koch and Alesey Min 3 Institut für Mathematische Stochasti Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Maschmühlenweg 8 0 37073 Göttingen Germany
More informationStrong uniqueness for stochastic evolution equations with possibly unbounded measurable drift term
1 Strong uniqueness for stochastic evolution equations with possibly unbounded measurable drift term Enrico Priola Torino (Italy) Joint work with G. Da Prato, F. Flandoli and M. Röckner Stochastic Processes
More informationThe Wiener Itô Chaos Expansion
1 The Wiener Itô Chaos Expansion The celebrated Wiener Itô chaos expansion is fundamental in stochastic analysis. In particular, it plays a crucial role in the Malliavin calculus as it is presented in
More informationFunctional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals
Functional Limit theorems for the quadratic variation of a continuous time random walk and for certain stochastic integrals Noèlia Viles Cuadros BCAM- Basque Center of Applied Mathematics with Prof. Enrico
More informationREGULARITY OF SUBELLIPTIC MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATIONS IN THE PLANE
REGULARITY OF SUBELLIPTIC MONGE-AMPÈRE EQUATIONS IN THE PLANE PENGFEI GUAN AND ERIC SAWYER (.). Introduction There is a vast body of elliptic regularity results for the Monge-Ampère equation det D u (x)
More informationNOTES ON EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS THEOREMS FOR ODES
NOTES ON EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS THEOREMS FOR ODES JONATHAN LUK These notes discuss theorems on the existence, uniqueness and extension of solutions for ODEs. None of these results are original. The proofs
More informationA NOTE ON STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS AS L 2 -CURVES
A NOTE ON STOCHASTIC INTEGRALS AS L 2 -CURVES STEFAN TAPPE Abstract. In a work of van Gaans (25a) stochastic integrals are regarded as L 2 -curves. In Filipović and Tappe (28) we have shown the connection
More informationHardy-Stein identity and Square functions
Hardy-Stein identity and Square functions Daesung Kim (joint work with Rodrigo Bañuelos) Department of Mathematics Purdue University March 28, 217 Daesung Kim (Purdue) Hardy-Stein identity UIUC 217 1 /
More informationWiener Measure and Brownian Motion
Chapter 16 Wiener Measure and Brownian Motion Diffusion of particles is a product of their apparently random motion. The density u(t, x) of diffusing particles satisfies the diffusion equation (16.1) u
More informationBrownian Motion. 1 Definition Brownian Motion Wiener measure... 3
Brownian Motion Contents 1 Definition 2 1.1 Brownian Motion................................. 2 1.2 Wiener measure.................................. 3 2 Construction 4 2.1 Gaussian process.................................
More information1 Lyapunov theory of stability
M.Kawski, APM 581 Diff Equns Intro to Lyapunov theory. November 15, 29 1 1 Lyapunov theory of stability Introduction. Lyapunov s second (or direct) method provides tools for studying (asymptotic) stability
More informationI forgot to mention last time: in the Ito formula for two standard processes, putting
I forgot to mention last time: in the Ito formula for two standard processes, putting dx t = a t dt + b t db t dy t = α t dt + β t db t, and taking f(x, y = xy, one has f x = y, f y = x, and f xx = f yy
More informationLecture 10: Semi-Markov Type Processes
Lecture 1: Semi-Markov Type Processes 1. Semi-Markov processes (SMP) 1.1 Definition of SMP 1.2 Transition probabilities for SMP 1.3 Hitting times and semi-markov renewal equations 2. Processes with semi-markov
More informationNonlinear stabilization via a linear observability
via a linear observability Kaïs Ammari Department of Mathematics University of Monastir Joint work with Fathia Alabau-Boussouira Collocated feedback stabilization Outline 1 Introduction and main result
More informationGENERATING SERIES FOR IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIALS OVER FINITE FIELDS
GENERATING SERIES FOR IRREDUCIBLE POLYNOMIALS OVER FINITE FIELDS ARNAUD BODIN Abstract. We count the number of irreducible polynomials in several variables of a given degree over a finite field. The results
More informationB. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAULT
DEVIAION INEQUALIIES FOR EXPONENIAL JUMP-DIFFUSION PROCESSES B. LAQUERRIÈRE AND N. PRIVAUL Abstract. In this note we obtain deviation inequalities for the law of exponential jump-diffusion processes at
More information2 (Bonus). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due 9/5). Prove that every countable set A is measurable and µ(a) = 0. 2 (Bonus). Let A consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is
More informationOPTIMAL SOLUTIONS TO STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSIONS
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 29,4 (22), pp. 387 398 Mariusz Michta (Zielona Góra) OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS TO STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL INCLUSIONS Abstract. A martingale problem approach is used first to analyze
More informationMATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA
MATH 205C: STATIONARY PHASE LEMMA For ω, consider an integral of the form I(ω) = e iωf(x) u(x) dx, where u Cc (R n ) complex valued, with support in a compact set K, and f C (R n ) real valued. Thus, I(ω)
More informationBrownian motion. Samy Tindel. Purdue University. Probability Theory 2 - MA 539
Brownian motion Samy Tindel Purdue University Probability Theory 2 - MA 539 Mostly taken from Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus by I. Karatzas and S. Shreve Samy T. Brownian motion Probability Theory
More informationPROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING HOMEWORK PROBLEMS
PROBABILITY: LIMIT THEOREMS II, SPRING 218. HOMEWORK PROBLEMS PROF. YURI BAKHTIN Instructions. You are allowed to work on solutions in groups, but you are required to write up solutions on your own. Please
More informationJae Gil Choi and Young Seo Park
Kangweon-Kyungki Math. Jour. 11 (23), No. 1, pp. 17 3 TRANSLATION THEOREM ON FUNCTION SPACE Jae Gil Choi and Young Seo Park Abstract. In this paper, we use a generalized Brownian motion process to define
More informationLecture 21 Representations of Martingales
Lecture 21: Representations of Martingales 1 of 11 Course: Theory of Probability II Term: Spring 215 Instructor: Gordan Zitkovic Lecture 21 Representations of Martingales Right-continuous inverses Let
More information5 Measure theory II. (or. lim. Prove the proposition. 5. For fixed F A and φ M define the restriction of φ on F by writing.
5 Measure theory II 1. Charges (signed measures). Let (Ω, A) be a σ -algebra. A map φ: A R is called a charge, (or signed measure or σ -additive set function) if φ = φ(a j ) (5.1) A j for any disjoint
More informationOn the minimum of several random variables
On the minimum of several random variables Yehoram Gordon Alexander Litvak Carsten Schütt Elisabeth Werner Abstract For a given sequence of real numbers a,..., a n we denote the k-th smallest one by k-
More informationUNCERTAINTY FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS FOR FINANCE
Surveys in Mathematics and its Applications ISSN 1842-6298 (electronic), 1843-7265 (print) Volume 5 (2010), 275 284 UNCERTAINTY FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS FOR FINANCE Iuliana Carmen Bărbăcioru Abstract.
More informationChapter 4. The dominated convergence theorem and applications
Chapter 4. The dominated convergence theorem and applications The Monotone Covergence theorem is one of a number of key theorems alllowing one to exchange limits and [Lebesgue] integrals (or derivatives
More informationIto Formula for Stochastic Integrals w.r.t. Compensated Poisson Random Measures on Separable Banach Spaces. B. Rüdiger, G. Ziglio. no.
Ito Formula for Stochastic Integrals w.r.t. Compensated Poisson Random Measures on Separable Banach Spaces B. Rüdiger, G. Ziglio no. 187 Diese rbeit ist mit Unterstützung des von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
More informationLAN property for ergodic jump-diffusion processes with discrete observations
LAN property for ergodic jump-diffusion processes with discrete observations Eulalia Nualart (Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona) joint work with Arturo Kohatsu-Higa (Ritsumeikan University, Japan) &
More informationThe Codimension of the Zeros of a Stable Process in Random Scenery
The Codimension of the Zeros of a Stable Process in Random Scenery Davar Khoshnevisan The University of Utah, Department of Mathematics Salt Lake City, UT 84105 0090, U.S.A. davar@math.utah.edu http://www.math.utah.edu/~davar
More informationBrownian Motion and Conditional Probability
Math 561: Theory of Probability (Spring 2018) Week 10 Brownian Motion and Conditional Probability 10.1 Standard Brownian Motion (SBM) Brownian motion is a stochastic process with both practical and theoretical
More informationNon-linear factorization of linear operators
Submitted exclusively to the London Mathematical Society doi:10.1112/0000/000000 Non-linear factorization of linear operators W. B. Johnson, B. Maurey and G. Schechtman Abstract We show, in particular,
More informationON A SDE DRIVEN BY A FRACTIONAL BROWNIAN MOTION AND WITH MONOTONE DRIFT
Elect. Comm. in Probab. 8 23122 134 ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS in PROBABILITY ON A SDE DRIVEN BY A FRACTIONAL BROWNIAN MOTION AND WIT MONOTONE DRIFT BRAIM BOUFOUSSI 1 Cadi Ayyad University FSSM, Department
More information(2m)-TH MEAN BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS UNDER PARAMETRIC PERTURBATIONS
(2m)-TH MEAN BEHAVIOR OF SOLUTIONS OF STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS UNDER PARAMETRIC PERTURBATIONS Svetlana Janković and Miljana Jovanović Faculty of Science, Department of Mathematics, University
More informationHomework #6 : final examination Due on March 22nd : individual work
Université de ennes Année 28-29 Master 2ème Mathématiques Modèles stochastiques continus ou à sauts Homework #6 : final examination Due on March 22nd : individual work Exercise Warm-up : behaviour of characteristic
More informationSet-Indexed Processes with Independent Increments
Set-Indexed Processes with Independent Increments R.M. Balan May 13, 2002 Abstract Set-indexed process with independent increments are described by convolution systems ; the construction of such a process
More informationSEPARABILITY AND COMPLETENESS FOR THE WASSERSTEIN DISTANCE
SEPARABILITY AND COMPLETENESS FOR THE WASSERSTEIN DISTANCE FRANÇOIS BOLLEY Abstract. In this note we prove in an elementary way that the Wasserstein distances, which play a basic role in optimal transportation
More informationOn the Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Some Continuous Time Processes
On the Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Some Continuous Time Processes Sergueï Dachian and Yury A. Kutoyants Laboratoire de Mathématiques, Université Blaise Pascal Laboratoire de Statistique et Processus, Université
More informationCitation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 41(4)
TitleA non quasi-invariance of the Brown Authors Sadasue, Gaku Citation Osaka Journal of Mathematics. 414 Issue 4-1 Date Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/1194/1174 DOI Rights Osaka University
More informationSupermodular ordering of Poisson arrays
Supermodular ordering of Poisson arrays Bünyamin Kızıldemir Nicolas Privault Division of Mathematical Sciences School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Nanyang Technological University 637371 Singapore
More informationµ X (A) = P ( X 1 (A) )
1 STOCHASTIC PROCESSES This appendix provides a very basic introduction to the language of probability theory and stochastic processes. We assume the reader is familiar with the general measure and integration
More informationAnalysis Comprehensive Exam Questions Fall 2008
Analysis Comprehensive xam Questions Fall 28. (a) Let R be measurable with finite Lebesgue measure. Suppose that {f n } n N is a bounded sequence in L 2 () and there exists a function f such that f n (x)
More informationOPTIMAL CONTROL AND STRANGE TERM FOR A STOKES PROBLEM IN PERFORATED DOMAINS
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 59 Fasc. 2 2002 Nova Série OPTIMAL CONTROL AND STRANGE TERM FOR A STOKES PROBLEM IN PERFORATED DOMAINS J. Saint Jean Paulin and H. Zoubairi Abstract: We study a problem of
More informationBernardo D Auria Stochastic Processes /10. Notes. Abril 13 th, 2010
1 Stochastic Calculus Notes Abril 13 th, 1 As we have seen in previous lessons, the stochastic integral with respect to the Brownian motion shows a behavior different from the classical Riemann-Stieltjes
More informationApplied Math Qualifying Exam 11 October Instructions: Work 2 out of 3 problems in each of the 3 parts for a total of 6 problems.
Printed Name: Signature: Applied Math Qualifying Exam 11 October 2014 Instructions: Work 2 out of 3 problems in each of the 3 parts for a total of 6 problems. 2 Part 1 (1) Let Ω be an open subset of R
More informationLogFeller et Ray Knight
LogFeller et Ray Knight Etienne Pardoux joint work with V. Le and A. Wakolbinger Etienne Pardoux (Marseille) MANEGE, 18/1/1 1 / 16 Feller s branching diffusion with logistic growth We consider the diffusion
More information3 (Due ). Let A X consist of points (x, y) such that either x or y is a rational number. Is A measurable? What is its Lebesgue measure?
MA 645-4A (Real Analysis), Dr. Chernov Homework assignment 1 (Due ). Show that the open disk x 2 + y 2 < 1 is a countable union of planar elementary sets. Show that the closed disk x 2 + y 2 1 is a countable
More informationIntegration on Measure Spaces
Chapter 3 Integration on Measure Spaces In this chapter we introduce the general notion of a measure on a space X, define the class of measurable functions, and define the integral, first on a class of
More informationTHE SKOROKHOD OBLIQUE REFLECTION PROBLEM IN A CONVEX POLYHEDRON
GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL: Vol. 3, No. 2, 1996, 153-176 THE SKOROKHOD OBLIQUE REFLECTION PROBLEM IN A CONVEX POLYHEDRON M. SHASHIASHVILI Abstract. The Skorokhod oblique reflection problem is studied
More informationMaximum Likelihood Drift Estimation for Gaussian Process with Stationary Increments
Austrian Journal of Statistics April 27, Volume 46, 67 78. AJS http://www.ajs.or.at/ doi:.773/ajs.v46i3-4.672 Maximum Likelihood Drift Estimation for Gaussian Process with Stationary Increments Yuliya
More informationREGULARITY FOR INFINITY HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN TWO DIMENSIONS
C,α REGULARITY FOR INFINITY HARMONIC FUNCTIONS IN TWO DIMENSIONS LAWRENCE C. EVANS AND OVIDIU SAVIN Abstract. We propose a new method for showing C,α regularity for solutions of the infinity Laplacian
More informationExponential martingales: uniform integrability results and applications to point processes
Exponential martingales: uniform integrability results and applications to point processes Alexander Sokol Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen 26 September, 2012 1 / 39 Agenda
More informationRiemann integral and volume are generalized to unbounded functions and sets. is an admissible set, and its volume is a Riemann integral, 1l E,
Tel Aviv University, 26 Analysis-III 9 9 Improper integral 9a Introduction....................... 9 9b Positive integrands................... 9c Special functions gamma and beta......... 4 9d Change of
More informationSTAT 7032 Probability Spring Wlodek Bryc
STAT 7032 Probability Spring 2018 Wlodek Bryc Created: Friday, Jan 2, 2014 Revised for Spring 2018 Printed: January 9, 2018 File: Grad-Prob-2018.TEX Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cincinnati,
More informationHIGHER INTEGRABILITY WITH WEIGHTS
Annales Academiæ Scientiarum Fennicæ Series A. I. Mathematica Volumen 19, 1994, 355 366 HIGHER INTEGRABILITY WITH WEIGHTS Juha Kinnunen University of Jyväskylä, Department of Mathematics P.O. Box 35, SF-4351
More informationDiscrete approximation of stochastic integrals with respect to fractional Brownian motion of Hurst index H > 1 2
Discrete approximation of stochastic integrals with respect to fractional Brownian motion of urst index > 1 2 Francesca Biagini 1), Massimo Campanino 2), Serena Fuschini 2) 11th March 28 1) 2) Department
More informationDifferentiation of Measures and Functions
Chapter 6 Differentiation of Measures and Functions This chapter is concerned with the differentiation theory of Radon measures. In the first two sections we introduce the Radon measures and discuss two
More informationSolving the Poisson Disorder Problem
Advances in Finance and Stochastics: Essays in Honour of Dieter Sondermann, Springer-Verlag, 22, (295-32) Research Report No. 49, 2, Dept. Theoret. Statist. Aarhus Solving the Poisson Disorder Problem
More informationMathematical Methods for Neurosciences. ENS - Master MVA Paris 6 - Master Maths-Bio ( )
Mathematical Methods for Neurosciences. ENS - Master MVA Paris 6 - Master Maths-Bio (2014-2015) Etienne Tanré - Olivier Faugeras INRIA - Team Tosca November 26th, 2014 E. Tanré (INRIA - Team Tosca) Mathematical
More informationStochastic Differential Equations.
Chapter 3 Stochastic Differential Equations. 3.1 Existence and Uniqueness. One of the ways of constructing a Diffusion process is to solve the stochastic differential equation dx(t) = σ(t, x(t)) dβ(t)
More informationQuasi-invariant measures on the path space of a diffusion
Quasi-invariant measures on the path space of a diffusion Denis Bell 1 Department of Mathematics, University of North Florida, 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road South, Jacksonville, FL 32224, U. S. A. email: dbell@unf.edu,
More informationSTOKES PROBLEM WITH SEVERAL TYPES OF BOUNDARY CONDITIONS IN AN EXTERIOR DOMAIN
Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Vol. 2013 2013, No. 196, pp. 1 28. ISSN: 1072-6691. URL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.txstate.edu STOKES PROBLEM
More informationMan Kyu Im*, Un Cig Ji **, and Jae Hee Kim ***
JOURNAL OF THE CHUNGCHEONG MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 19, No. 4, December 26 GIRSANOV THEOREM FOR GAUSSIAN PROCESS WITH INDEPENDENT INCREMENTS Man Kyu Im*, Un Cig Ji **, and Jae Hee Kim *** Abstract.
More informationEXISTENCE OF NEUTRAL STOCHASTIC FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH ABSTRACT VOLTERRA OPERATORS
International Journal of Differential Equations and Applications Volume 7 No. 1 23, 11-17 EXISTENCE OF NEUTRAL STOCHASTIC FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS WITH ABSTRACT VOLTERRA OPERATORS Zephyrinus C.
More informationDensities for the Navier Stokes equations with noise
Densities for the Navier Stokes equations with noise Marco Romito Università di Pisa Universitat de Barcelona March 25, 2015 Summary 1 Introduction & motivations 2 Malliavin calculus 3 Besov bounds 4 Other
More informationA TWO PARAMETERS AMBROSETTI PRODI PROBLEM*
PORTUGALIAE MATHEMATICA Vol. 53 Fasc. 3 1996 A TWO PARAMETERS AMBROSETTI PRODI PROBLEM* C. De Coster** and P. Habets 1 Introduction The study of the Ambrosetti Prodi problem has started with the paper
More informationThe concentration of a drug in blood. Exponential decay. Different realizations. Exponential decay with noise. dc(t) dt.
The concentration of a drug in blood Exponential decay C12 concentration 2 4 6 8 1 C12 concentration 2 4 6 8 1 dc(t) dt = µc(t) C(t) = C()e µt 2 4 6 8 1 12 time in minutes 2 4 6 8 1 12 time in minutes
More informationOn boundary value problems for fractional integro-differential equations in Banach spaces
Malaya J. Mat. 3425 54 553 On boundary value problems for fractional integro-differential equations in Banach spaces Sabri T. M. Thabet a, and Machindra B. Dhakne b a,b Department of Mathematics, Dr. Babasaheb
More informationExistence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity
Existence of minimizers for the pure displacement problem in nonlinear elasticity Cristinel Mardare Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6, Laboratoire Jacques-Louis Lions, Paris, F-75005 France Abstract
More information