arxiv:hep-ph/ v3 27 Mar 2007

Transcription

1 FIUN-GCP-07/3 W-gauge boson condensation via background currents arxiv:hep-ph/07036v3 7 Mar 007 C. A. Peña and C. J. Quimbay Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, Colombia March 7, 007 Abstract We study the electroweak standard model at finite temperature in presence of a bosonic chemical potential associated with the conserved electromagnetic current. To preserve the thermodynamic equilibrium of the system, the thermal medium is neutralized by the introduction of four background currents related to the four gauge bosons of this model. Using the mean-field approximation, in the high temperature limit, we find that there exists a difference between the effective mass of the spatial and temporal components of the W-gauge boson. A W-gauge boson condensation inducted via the background currents allows to vanish this difference. Introduction Since long time ago it is well known that the spontaneous symmetry breaking for gauge theories at finite temperature in presence of chemical potentials can be seen as a Bose- Einstein condensation phenomena [, ]. At this respect, the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field at finite temperature can be seen as a variational parameter of Bose-Einstein condensation of the Higgs field. The Electroweak Standard Model (ESM allows to simultaneously both electroweak phase transition and Bose-Einstein condensation for the Higgs field if a bosonic chemical potential µ related with the conserved electromagnetic current of the model is considered in the system. It was found in [] that the Critical Temperature (T c of the electroweak phase transition increases with µ. This fact suggest that µ can be considered as an effective parameter of spontaneous symmetry breaking. To make the system neutral, it was necessary in capenac@unal.edu.co, associate researcher of Universidad Antonio Nariño, Bogotá, Colombia. cjquimbayh@unal.edu.co, associate researcher of CIF, Bogotá, Colombia.

2 [] to add an external charge background to offset the charge density of the scalar field. On the other hand, a zero temperature condensation of SU( vectorial bosons generated by an external lepton density was proposed in [3]-[4], for the case in which the system is electrically neutralized by the inclusion of a external charge. The generalization at finite temperature of a W-gauge boson condensation was investigated in [5]-[8] for the case of ESM. This W-gauge boson condensation for the ESM can be induced by the presence of a fermion density in the system. Specifically, a W-gauge boson condensed was investigated by consideration of the chemical potentials associated with the conserved electromagnetic and leptonic currents [5]. This condensed can also be investigated by the additional consideration of the chemical potential associated with the conserved weak neutral current [7]-[8]. The way followed in references [5]-[8] to study the existence of the W-gauge boson condensation was through the calculation of the thermodynamical potential, which allows to the phase diagram of this condensation. It is possible to see in these references that if the chemical potentials associated with the conserved leptonic and neutral weak currents vanish, the chemical potential associated with conserved electromagnetic current µ has a zero value in T = T c, being this fact consistent with the gauge symmetry restoration at high temperatures. This behavior is not strange because the condensed considered in these references is neutral and the T c has not a dependence over µ. In such references the neutralization of the thermodynamic system was performed by the inclusion of the leptonic chemical potential associated with the conserved leptonic current of the ESM. In this paper we propose a W-gauge boson condensation for the ESM at high temperatures which is inducted by the inclusion of background currents (external charges in the thermodynamical system. This W-gauge boson condensation differs from the one previously studied in the literature [5]-[8] in the sense that it is inducted but with external charge, instead of a fermion density. By this reason we do not include in the system the chemical potentials associated with the conserved leptonic and neutral weak currents. We only include a bosonic chemical potential µ associated with the conserved electromagnetic current of the ESM. We neutralize the thermal medium by the introduction of a external charge background which offsets the charge density of the scalar field, as was performed by Kapusta in []. Specifically we preserve the thermodynamic equilibrium of the system by the introduction of four background currents J, J, J and J3, which are associated with the four gauge bosons of the ESM [, 9, 0]. The background currents J and J are associated with the SU( L gauge fields A and A respectively. It is possible to see that if the background currents J and J vanish, then the vacuum average values of the A and A fields vanish too, i. e. A 0 = A 0 = 0. We note that the bosonic chemical potential that we consider here does not vanish for T = T c, because our interest is focused in

3 the coexistence of the electroweak broken phase and the Higgs condensed. Considering the ESM at finite temperature in presence of µ, in section, we calculate the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field as a function of T and µ, using the mean-field approximation in the high temperature limit []. Next we calculate, in section 3, the effective masses of the scalar and gauge bosons using a generalized gauge. We find that the effective mass of the spatial component of the W-gauge boson has a difference of µ respect to its temporal component. In section 4, by consideration of non-vanishing background currents J and J, we assume that the vacuum average values of the A and A fields do not vanish. i. e. A 0 = ξ A and A 0 = ξ A. Because the W-gauge field is a combination of the A and A fields, then we obtain a W-gauge boson condensation associated to the spatial component of W-gauge boson. As a consequence of this condensed, the mentioned difference among the effective masses of the spatial and temporal components of the W-gauge boson vanishes. In section 5, by mean of the calculation of the thermodynamic potential, we obtain the electromagnetic charge density of the system and we calculate the critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation. We demonstrate that the W-gauge boson condensed is consistent with the usual condition of condensation m W = µ, where m W is the effective mass of the W-gauge boson. Finally the conclusion are presented in section 6. Vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field Because the electromagnetic current is conserved in the ESM, then it is possible to associate a bosonic chemical potential µ with the electromagnetic charge. In the formalism of the quantum field theory at finite temperature [9], µ is introduced in the formalism through the partition function. We initially restrict our interest to the gauge boson and scalar sectors of the ESM. Performing the functional integrations over the canonical momentums, we obtain that the effective Lagrangian density L eff of the ESM is [] L eff = [(D + iµqδ 0 Φ] + [(D + iµqδ 0 Φ] + c Φ + Φ λ(φ + Φ 4 Gµ G µ 4 F µ a F µ a + g B J + ga a Ja, (. where D = + iga a τ a / + ig B / is the SU( L U( Y covariant derivative, Q = (I + τ/ is the electromagnetic charge, G µ = µ B B µ is the U( Y strength field tensor, F a µ = µa a A a µ gǫabc (A b µ + µ g δ µ0δ b3 (A c + µ g δ 0δ c3 (.

4 is the SU( L effective strength field tensor [], and J = J 0 δ 0, (. 3 J a = J 3 0δ 0 δ a3, (. 4 are respectively the abelian and non-abelian background currents which are introduced with the purpose of having a vanishing electromagnetic charge density, preserving the thermodynamical equilibrium of the system [, 7, ]. It can be seen in (. that the gauge fields have a shift proportional to µ. For µ = 0 the shift vanishes, (. becomes in the normal non-abelian strength field tensor and the Lagrangian density given by (. becomes in the usual for the scalar and gauge boson sectors of the ESM. Starting of the effective Lagrangian density (., it is possible to show that the equation of motion for the scalar field doublet Φ is given by ( + i g ( A a τa + iga a τa + i g ( B + ig B + iµ(i + τ [ga a τa + g B + µδ 0 (I + τ 3 ] c Φ = λφφ + Φ. (. 5 In the ESM, the electroweak symmetry is broken spontaneously through the Higgs mechanism. As it is shown in [], since we are considering a system which has an external charge density, the Higgs mechanism is associated with the existence of a Bose-Einstein condensed. The implementation of this mechanism is performed by means of the following translation of the scalar field doublet Φ = ( ψ + iψ + ψ 3 + iψ 4 ( ξ 0 = ( + ψ + iψ ψ 3 + iψ 4, (. 6 where the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field has been defined in terms of the ξ parameter as = ξ. The ξ parameter represents the infrared stated of the field Φ, and it can be understood as a variational parameter of the Bose-Einstein condensation of this scalar field. The choosing of a vacuum state of the system through (. 6 is consistent with the fact that this state is energetically preferred for the case µ 0 []. Substituting (. 6 into (. 5, using the mean-field approximation in which both the field and mixed field fluctuations vanish [], we obtain that the non-trivial solution for ξ is ξ = [ c + µ λ(3 ψ λ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 + e A A + 4 (g g ( e Z Z gg + ] g W + W = λ [c + µ T ( g g 4 + λ ], (. 7

5 where the electromagnetic (A, neutral electroweak boson (Z and charged electroweak boson (W ± fields have been defined as usual in terms of the abelian (B and non-abelian (A a gauge boson fields. We have used in (. 7 the definition e = gg /(g + g, and the Gibbs averages have been evaluated in the high temperature limit [0], i. e. W + W = Z Z = A A = 3T, ψ = ψ = ψ 3 = ψ4 = T. The T c of the electroweak phase transition corresponds to the temperature in which the electroweak symmetry is restored. The value of T c is obtained for the temperature in which ξ vanishes, i.e. ξ(t c = 0. From (. 7, we obtain that the square of T c is given by [] Tc = 4(c + µ (. 8 + λ. g + 3g 4 4 Due ξ is a parameter of Bose-Einstein condensation of the field Φ, the temperature given by (. 8 also corresponds to the critical temperature of the Bose-Einstein condensation of the same field. The T c obtained does not contain the fermion contributions and its value is unknown due λ and µ are free parameters. We can observe that µ has the effect to increase the T c value. For µ = 0, it is known that T c 00 GeV. 3 Effective masses of the bosonic fields The equation of motion for the scalar field doublet Φ, given by (. 5, leads to the equations of motion for the scalar fields ψ, ψ, ψ 3 and ψ 4. If we use the meanfield approximation in these equations of motion, the following mixing terms vanish [iga a τ a + ig B + i g (A a τ a + i g ( B ]φ, A a φ, B φ, A B φ. Using the following result that is obtained from the first-order perturbation theory [] ψ 3 + ψ ψ + ψ ψ 3 + ψ ψ 4 = [ 3 ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 ], (3. we find that the equations of motion of the scalars decouple and they can be written as ( + M (,,3,4eff ψ,,3,4 = 0, being M (,,3,4eff the effective masses of the scalar

6 bosons. We obtain that the square of these effective masses are M eff M eff M 3eff = c µ + λ(3 ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 e A A 4 (g g ( e Z Z gg g W + W + 6λξ = 4λξ, (3. = c µ + λ(3 ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 e A A 4 (g g ( e Z Z gg g W + W + λξ, = λ( ψ ψ, (3. 3 = c + λ(3 ψ 3 + ψ + ψ + ψ 4 g W + W 4 (gg e Z Z + λξ, = λ( ψ3 ψ, (3. 4 M 4eff = c + λ(3 ψ 4 + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 g W + W 4 (gg e Z Z + λξ, = λ( ψ4 ψ. (3. 5 [ ( ] We observe that in the high temperature limit Meff = c +µ T g + 3g +λ and Meff = M 3eff = M 4eff = 0. The effective masses obtained for the scalar particles do not include the effects of performing the gauge fixing. In the next we will use the renormalizable R ρ gauge [8]. The effective Lagrangian density (. leads to the effective equations of motion for the non-physical gauge bosons B and A a. It is possible to prove that the effective equation for the abelian gauge boson B is [ ] µ G µ = i g [(D + iµqδ 0 φ] + φ φ + (D + iµqδ 0 φ g J, (3. 6 while the ones for the non-abelian gauge bosons A a are µ a F µ = i g [(D + iµqδ 0 φ { ] } + τ a φ φ + τ a [(D + iµqδ 0 φ] ǫ abc b F µ (ga cµ + µδ µ0 δ c3 gj a, (3. 7 being a =,, 3. After substituting (. 6 into (3. 6, taking the statistical average, without considering fluctuations of the abelian gauge field, i. e. < B >= 0, we

7 obtain that the background abelian current J is given by J = i ( D φ + φ φ + ( D φ, (3. 8 where D = D + iµqδ 0. In the mean-field approximation, the mixed field terms of (3. 8 can be forgotten and we obtain J = µδ 0 (ξ + ψ + ψ, (3. 9 being J proportional to µ. It is clear that for a vanishing chemical potential this background abelian current vanishes. In a similar way, starting from (3. 7, without considering fluctuations as A a 0 = 0, we obtain that the background non-abelian current J a has the form J a = i [ ( D φ + τ a φ φ + τ a ( D φ ] g ǫabc b F µ (gacµ + µδ µ0 δ c3. (3. 0 After substituting (. 6 into (3. 0, we obtain the three following background currents: J = µ [ A g 0 0 δ 0 A ] 0, (3. J = µ g J 3 [ A 0 0 δ 0 A ] 0, (3. = µδ [ 0 ξ + ψ + ψ ] [ ( (A +µ + (A δ 0 ( A A0 + A A0 ], (3. 3 where we note that J a, with a =,, 3, are proportional to µ. As we have defined J a = J3 0 δa3 δ 0 in (. 4, this means that J = J = 0. According with (3. and (3., it is necessary by consistency that A i 0 = A i 0 = 0. It is clear that the background currents J y J 3 are not conserved because they have a dependence over the temperature. Additionally, because there are not vacuum fluctuations for the nonabelian gauge fields A y A, then there not exists a W-gauge boson condensation due W ± 0 = ( A 0 i A 0 = 0. Using the mean-field approximation, in which the mixing terms that appears in the equation of motion (3. 6 and (3. 7 vanish, we obtain that the effective masses

8 of the non-physical gauge bosons are given by being MeffB = g ( ξ + ψ 4 + ψ + ψ3 + ψ4, (3. 4 M effa M effa 3 = M effa = g 4 (ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 + q, (3. 5 = g 4 (ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4, (3. 6 q = { 0, if = 0. µ, if = i. (3. 7 Because the W-gauge boson is defined as W ± = (A ia, we observe that the effective mass of the spatial component of the W-gauge boson has a difference of µ respect to its temporal component. The quantity ψ + ψ + ψ ( 3 + ψ 4, which appears in (3. 4, (3. 5 and (3. 6, has its origin in the term ψ +ψ +ψ3 +ψ4 [(A +(A +(A 3 ] +(B of the Lagrangian density (. and contributes also to the effective masses of the scalar bosons. With the purpose to include only the terms that contribute to the effective masses of the bosons, we obtain that the effective action S E, in the imaginary time formalism, is given by [ S E = d 4 x ψ ( + Meffψ ψ ( + Meffψ ψ 3( + M3effψ 3 ψ 4( + M4effψ 4 + ξ (µ + c λξ + [ ( ] A3 + g ξ g µ µ A 3µ + [ ( A + g ξ + q ] g µ µ A µ + [ ( A + g ξ + q ] g µ µ A µ + B [ ( + g ξ µ ]B + ga3 ξ ψ ga ξ ψ 3 + ga ξ ψ 4 + g B ξ ψ ], (3. 8 where we have depressed the terms of L eff which do not contribute to the equations of motion and we have only preserved the terms which can be canceled with the gauge fixing.

9 In this paper we work with the renormalizable R ρ gauge [8]. For the U( Y abelian part, the gauge fixing function is given by F = B g ξρψ f(x, τ, (3. 9 F α = ( g ρξ, (3. 0 being α the abelian gauge transformation phase given by B B = B α(x, τ, while for the SU( L non-abelian gauge part, the gauge fixing function is given by: F = A g ξρψ4 f (x, τ, (3. F = A + g ξρψ3 f (x, τ, (3. F 3 = A 3 g ξρψ f 3 (x, τ. (3. 3 Because f a (x, τ labels the three gauge arbitrary functions and α a (x, τ labels the non-abelian gauge transformation phases: then: A c A c = A c + gǫ abc A a α b (x, τ α c (x, τ, (3. 4 F i α i = ( g ρξ, for i =,, 3. (3. 5 We observe that our gauge fixing functions F and F a do not have a dependence over µ and this fact will allow to obtain a gauge invariant thermodynamical potential which does not depend over the ρ parameter. The effective partition function Z E that we obtain working in the generalized gauge fixing and in the imaginary time formalism is ( [ ] 3( [ Z E = det τ + m ] C det a τ + m C D[ψ ]D[ψ ]D[ψ 3 ]D[ψ 4 ]D[A ]D[A ]D[A 3 ]D[B ] periodic D[f ]D[f ]D[f 3 ]D[F]δ(F δ(f δ(f 3 δ(f { β exp S E dτ d 3 x ρ (fa + } ρ (f, ( V

10 where the two determinants which appear in this partition function are the Fadev- Popov s determinants and they contain the contribution of the ghost fields C a and C, whose masses are m C = ( g ρξ and m a C = ( g ρξ, respectively. Now it is possible to identify in the argument of the exponential the bosonic effective masses. The squares of the effective masses of the scalar bosons are m (ξ = M eff, (3. 7 m (ξ = M eff + g ρξ + g ρξ, (3. 8 m 3 (ξ = M 3eff + g ρξ, (3. 9 m 4 (ξ = M 4eff + g ρξ, (3. 30 where the effective masses Meff, M eff, M 3eff and M 4eff are given by (3., (3. 3, (3. 4 and (3. 5, respectively. In the high temperature limit, the effective masses of the Higgs and Goldstone bosons are: m H (ξ = λ(ξ, (3. 3 m φ 0(ξ = g + g ρ(ξ, 4 (3. 3 m g φ ±(ξ = 4 ρ(ξ, (3. 33 [ ( ] being ξ = c + µ T g + 3g + λ. We note that the effective masses of λ the Goldstone bosons depend on the gauge parameter ρ and therefore the Goldstone bosons are not part of the physical particle spectrum. On the other hand, the squares of the effective masses of the non-physical gauge bosons are given by m B (ξ = g ( ξ, ( m A (ξ, µ = g m A (ξ, µ = 4 (ξ + q, (3. 35 m g A (ξ = 3 4 (ξ. (3. 36 Starting from (3. 34, (3. 35 and (3. 36, we can write the squares of the effective

11 masses of the physical gauge bosons as m A (ξ = ( g (g [g m g 4 g 4 B e g m A ] 3 = 0, (3. 37 m Z (ξ = ( g (g [g m g 4 g 4 B e g m A ] 3 = g + g [ c + µ T 4λ 4 m (ξ, µ = W ± m A (ξ, = m A (ξ, µ = g [ c + µ T (g 4λ 4 (g 4 + 3g 4 + λ], ( g 4 + λ] + q. (3. 39 The effective masses given by (3. 38 and (3. 39 allow to the physical masses of the electroweak gauge bosons taking T = 0 and µ = 0. For the case T 0 and µ = 0, these masses are in agree with the effective masses given in []. We note that the effective mass of the W-gauge boson is a function of the amount q. This implies that the effective mass of the spatial component of the W-gauge boson has a difference of µ respect to its temporal component. This behavior is in agree with the observation realized by Kapusta in [8], when he mentioned that the transverse W s have associated a chemical potential µ whereas the longitudinal W s does not have one. This strange behavior is contrary to what happens in the non-gauge theories where all three spin states of a massive spin- bosons have a associated a common chemical potential [8]. For high temperatures above the T c of the electroweak phase transition, i. e. T T C, we observe from (3. 38 that the effective mass of the Z-gauge boson vanishes because ξ = 0, while from (3. 39 the effective mass for the W-gauge boson nonvanishes, and it takes the value m W ± (ξ, µ = q. 4 Induction of a W-gauge boson condensation In the effective Lagrangian density of the ESM, given by (., we have introduced the abelian J µ and non-abelian Jµ 3 background currents with the purpose to have a vanishing electromagnetic charge density, and so, to preserve the thermodynamic equilibrium of the system. Now we also introduce in the system the non-abelian background currents Jµ and J µ, in such a way that the thermodynamic equilibrium of the system is not affected. The fact of considering Jµ 0 and Jµ 0 implies from (3. and (3. that A i 0 0 and A i 0 0. We parameterize the non-vanishing

12 vacuum average values of the spatial components of the A and A fields as follow: A i 0 = ξ A i (x, (4. A i 0 = ξ A i (x, (4. in such a way that they acquire non-homogeneous classical components. The nonhomogeneity is shown by the dependence of ξ A i (x and ξ A i (x on the space-time. The later means that the vacuum average value of the spatial components of the W-gauge boson fields are non-homogeneous, and it is given by W ± i 0(x = ξ W ± i (x = ( ξa i (x iξ A i (x. (4. 3 This fact implies that we have obtained a W-gauge boson condensation associated with the spatial component of the W-gauge boson, for a system in which were not included the chemical potentials associated with the conserved leptonic and neutral weak currents. The background currents (3. and (3. are written as: gj = µ [ A 0 0 δ 0 A 0 ] = µ [ ξ A 0 (xδ 0 ξ A (x ], (4. 4 gj = µ [ A 0 0 δ 0 A 0 ] = µ [ ξ A 0 (xδ 0 ξ A (x ]. (4. 5 We observe that the time components of J and J vanish, while the spatial components of these currents non-vanish. The later means that the non-abelian background currents given by (4. 4 and (4. 5 are given by: gj = µ ξ A (x, (4. 6 gj = µ ξ A (x, (4. 7 where is clear that ξ A 0 (x = ξ A 0 (x = 0. If we use the mean-field approximation in the equation of motion (3. 7, modified by the introduction of the two news background currents, we obtain (( g µ µ + g 4 (( g µ µ + g 4 ( ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 + q A µ = gj, (4. 8 ( ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 + q A µ = gj, (4. 9 where the square of the vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field ξ, for this case, is ξ = ξ + ( g λ 4 (ξ W + + g 4 (ξ W, (4. 0

13 being (ξ W + and (ξ W the parameters of W-gauge boson condensation. The effective masses of the A and A fields can be obtained from the equation of motions of these fields in the vacuum state. If we substitute (4. 6 and (4. 7 into (4. 8 and (4. 9, respectively, and remembering that A, 0 = ξ A,(x, we obtain. (( g µ µ + g 4 (ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 ξ A,(x = 0, (4. µ where is clear the cancelation of the term q. For an excited state it is also possible to find the effective masses of the non-abelian gauge fields by the consideration of a small variation of the vacuum state as Aµ, ξ A,(X + δξ µ A, (X. Applying this µ result into (4. 8 and (4. 9, we obtain: (( g µ µ + g 4 (ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 + q δξ A,(x = 0, (4. µ due there not exist a W-gauge boson condensed in an excited state, i. e. ξ A,(x = 0. µ So, the effective masses of the non-abelian gauge bosons are M effa, = { g 4 (ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4 + q, (Excited state, 4 (ξ + ψ + ψ + ψ 3 + ψ 4, (Vacuum state, (4. 3 g being clear that the term q vanish in the vacuum state of the A and A fields. This vacuum state corresponds to the phase of W-gauge boson condensation. In the condensation phase the effective mass of the spatial components of the W-gauge boson is equal to its temporal component. The difference among the effective masses of the spatial and temporal components of the W-gauge boson has vanished as a consequence of the introduction of the non-abelian background currents J,, given by (4. 6 and ( Critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation The critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation T w can be obtained from (. 7 and (4. 0, for the case in which (ξ W ± = 0. This critical temperature is given by ( 4 Tw = c + µ λξ(t w 4 g + 3, (5. 4 g + λ where ξ is evaluated in T = T w. The expression (5. is not useful to calculate T w because ξ (T w is unknown. To known T w it is necessary first to calculate the thermodynamic potential Ω f, using the mean field approximation, in the high temperature limit.

14 To calculate Ω f, by convenience, we initially calculate the thermodynamic potential Ω 0 that we obtain for the case in which the background currents J µ and Jµ 3 are not included in the system. The effective partition function ZE 0 for this case is given by ( [ ZE 0 ] 3( [ = det τ + m ] C det a τ + m C D[ψ ]D[ψ ]D[ψ 3 ]D[ψ 4 ]D[δξ A ]D[δξ A ]D[A 3 ]D[B ] periodic D[f ]D[f ]D[f 3 ]D[F]δ(F δ(f δ(f 3 δ(f exp[a], (5. where the effective action A is β { A = dτ d 3 ( x 0 V ψ τ + m (ξ ψ + ( ψ τ + m (ξ + ( ψ 3 τ + m 3 (ξ ψ 3 + ( ψ 4 τ + m 4 (ξ ψ 4 + ( ( ξ A µ(x, τ τ + g ξ δµ + ρ ρ µ ξ A (x, τ + ( ( ξ A µ(x, τ τ + g ξ δµ + ρ ρ µ ξ A (x, τ + ( ( A3µ τ + g ξ δµ + ρ ρ µ A 3 + ( ( Bµ τ + g ξ δµ + ρ ρ µ B +ξ( µ + c λξ g ] + [(ξ W + (ξ + W 4 ξ + µ [(ξ W + + (ξ W ] }. (5. 3 After performing the functional integrals over lnze 0, using the high temperature limit, we obtain that the thermodynamic potential Ω 0 is Ω 0 = ln Z0 E βv = ξ [ µ + c + T 4 ( 3g 4 +λξ 4 g 4 ξ ( 3g 4 + g T 4 + λ g 4 + λ π 5 T 4 ] (µ + 4c T ((ξ W + + (ξ W. ( ψ

15 We observe that Ω 0 does not dependent from the gauge parameter ρ. For the case µ = 0, we obtain that (5. 4 is in agree with the thermodynamic potential known in the literature [9]. Starting from (5. 4 we find that the electromagnetic charge density σ 0 for the non-neutralized system is σ 0 = Ω 0 µ = µt 6 + µξ. (5. 5 If we include in the system the background currents J µ and J 3 µ, the system has now a vanishing electromagnetic charge density. The electromagnetic charge density σ for the neutralized system is given by σ = βv ln Z µ = βv Z Z, (5. 6 µ where Z is the partition function given by (3. 6 modified by the inclusion of the non-abelian background currents Jµ and J µ. Using the mean field approximation, in the high temperature limit, we obtain that where σ 0 is given by (5. 5 and σ is σ = 4 µ F µ a = 3µT 6 σ = σ 0 + σ, (5. 7 F µ a + µ g B 0 J 0 + ga 0 3 J3 0 + µ g B 0 J 0 + ga 0 3 J3 0 (5. 8 Because the system has been neutralized, then the electromagnetic charge density vanishes, i. e. σ = σ 0 + σ = 0, and then: g B 0 J 0 + ga 0 3 J3 0 = 3 µ T µξ dµ + f(t, (5. 9 where f(t is an arbitrary function over temperature, that we choose as zero. For T = T c, we obtain that the background currents are: J 0 = T=Tc µt c, (5. 0 = 7µT c. (5. T=Tc J 3 0

16 Substituting (5. 0 and (5. into (5. 9, and assuming a non-vanishing chemical potential, we obtain that (g B 0 + 7g A 0 3 = 4µ. (5. We observe, for T = T c, that a possible solution of the last equation is B 0 = µ and g A 0 3 = µ. This means that any value of µ satisfies σ = 0, and then µ can describes g a phase transition. The thermodynamic potential of the neutralized system can be written as Ω f = Ω 0 σ dµ g A J + A J. (5. 3 With the end to find (ξ W ±, we calculate Ω f near to T w, and we obtain: Ω f = Ω 0 6µ T 4 If we minimize (5. 4 respect to (ξ W, we find that ] g B 0 J 0 + ga 0 3J0 3 [(ξ µ W + (ξ + W. (5. 4 Ω f Ω 0 = (ξ W (ξ W µ = 0. (5. 5 where we have taken in consideration that the quantity g B 0 J 0 +ga 0 3J0 3, for T T w, does not depend over (ξ W. We have also considered that (ξ W = (ξ W + = (ξ W and we have used written as ξ (ξ W = g 4λ Ω f (ξ W = g 4λ [c + µ ]. It is easy to probe that the equation (5. 5 can be ( T T c + 3g4 8λ (ξ W µ = 0. (5. 6 From this last equation, we can obtain (ξ W = [ [c + µ ] ( T ] 4λµ 3g Tc g = [ ( g c + µ ] 3g 4 + 3g T 4 + λ 4 4λµ, (5. 7 g where we have substituted T c by the value given by (5. 7. The critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation T w is obtained from (5. 7, doing (ξ W = 0, and is given by: T w = 4(c + µ 4λµ g g + 3g λ. (5. 8

17 Comparing (5. 8 with (5., we observe that: λξ (T w = 4 λµ, (5. 9 g and it is possible to obtain from this last expression the known W-gauge condensation condition given by [5, 7, 8] m W(ξ = g ξ (T w = µ, (5. 0 being this fact a good indicator of the theoretical consistency of the W-gauge boson condensation induced by the introduction of the background currents Jµ and J µ. If the fermions are included in the ESM, considering the Yukawa terms in the Lagrangian, the square of the critical temperature of the electroweak phase transition T c is given by 4(c + µ T c =, (5. g + 3g + λ m= [Y dm + Y um + Y em 3 ] being the Y s the Yukawa coupling constants of the quarks and charged leptons. On the other hand, the square of the critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation, for this case, is Tw = 4(c + µ 4λµ g g + 3g + λ m= [Y dm + Y um + Y em 3 ]. (5. We observe that the inclusion of the fermions in the system allows to low the value of the critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation. This fact is also valid for the case of the critical temperature of the electroweak phase transition. 6 Conclusions In this paper we have shown a W-gauge boson condensation in the ESM inducted by the inclusion of background currents in the thermodynamical system. The W-gauge boson condensation that we have presented here has an origin different from the one studied in references [5]-[8]. Specifically we have not included in the system the chemical potentials associated with the conserved leptonic and neutral weak currents. We have considered the ESM at finite temperature in presence of only a bosonic chemical potential µ associated with the conserved electromagnetic current. We have neutralized the thermal medium by the introduction of a external charge background which offsets the charge density of the scalar field. Particularly we have preserved

18 the thermodynamic equilibrium of the system by the introduction of two currents J and J 3, which are associated with the U( Y gauge field and the third SU( L gauge field, respectively. We have calculated the effective masses of the scalar and gauge bosons using the mean-field approximation in the high temperature limit. We have found that the effective mass of the spatial component of the W-gauge boson has a difference of µ respect to its temporal component. By the inclusion in the system of the background currents J and J, which are associated with the first and second gauge fields of the SU( L gauge group, we have obtained a W-gauge boson condensation associated to the spatial component of W-gauge boson. As a consequence of this condensed, the mentioned difference among the effective masses of the spatial and temporal components of the W-gauge boson have vanished. We have obtained the critical temperature of the W-gauge boson condensation as a function of µ. We have demonstrated that the W-gauge boson condensed is consistent with the usual condition of condensation m W = µ, where m W is the effective mass of the W-gauge boson. We think that this work is a contribution in the purpose to understand a little better the origin and properties of the W-gauge boson condensation at high temperatures. Acknowledgments This work was supported by COLCIENCIAS (Colombia under research grant , CT We are indebted to Belén Gavela by important suggestions about this paper. C. Q. thanks Theoretical Physics Department of Universidad Autónoma de Madrid by its hospitality. References [] J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D 4 ( [] H. E. Haber and H. A. Weldon, Phys. Rev. D 5 (98 50; Phys. Rev. Lett. 46 ( [3] A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 86 B ( [4] I. V. Krive, Yad. Fiz. 3 ( [5] H. Pérez Rojas and O. K. Kalashnikov, Nucl. Phys. B 93 (987 4; Phys. Rev. D 40 (

19 [6] M. Chaichian, C. Montonen and H. Pérez Rojas, Phys. Lett. B 56 (99 7. [7] E. J. Ferrer, V. De La Incera and A. E. Shabad, Phys. Lett. B 85 ( ; Nucl. Phys. B 309 ( [8] J. I. Kapusta, Phys. Rev. D 4 ( [9] J. I. Kapusta, Finite-Temperature Field Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 989. [0] A. D. Linde, Rep. Prog. Phys. 4 ( [] F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Phys. Rev. 68 D ( [] M. B. Gavela, O. Pene, N. Rius and S. Vargas-Castrillón, Phys. Rev. 59 D (