Is there a Scalar Sector?

Transcription

1 Is there a Scalar Sector? Roberto Peccei Cornwall Symposium UCLA November 2009

2 Is there a Scalar Sector? The Cornwall Norton Paper Technicolor and its Troubles Difficulties with CP Concluding Remarks

3 The Cornwall - Norton Paper In 1973 Mike Cornwall and Dick Norton published a seminal paper entitled: Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Without Scalar Mesons [Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 3338] which showed that one could construct a gauge theory with spontaneous symmetry breaking without introducing elementary scalar fields Similar ideas were put forth in parallel by Roman Jackiw and Ken Johnson [Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 2386]

4 These papers provided the theoretical underpinning for dynamical models of electroweak symmetry breaking, known generically as Technicolor models, introduced by Weinberg and Susskind in the late 1970s Although realistic Technicolor models are difficult to construct, experimentally the possibility remains open that the electroweak theory breakdown is generated dynamically rather than as the result of the non-vanishing vacuum expectation value of a scalar field- the Higgs mechanism Nevertheless, avoiding a scalar sector is hard to do!

5 Before discussing the reasons why it is difficult to avoid a scalar sector, I want to briefly review the Cornwall-Norton argument. They considered a theory with 2 degenerate fermions and two gauge fields. One of the gauge fields couples diagonally to the fermions, but the other off-diagonally. Taking ψ one has: L int = g ψγ µ ψa µ + g ψγ µ τ 2 ψb µ which is invariant under two U(1) symmetries ψ e iα ψ and ψ e iτ 2 β ψ

6 If the dynamics of the theory were to break the off-diagonal U(1) symmetry spontaneously then one would expect: i. The fermion mass degeneracy to lift m 1 m 2 ii. The gauge field Bµ to acquire a mass M B 0 Cornwall and Norton addressed this possibility by looking at the Schwinger-Dyson equations for the model. The fermion self energy has two pieces, one which does not and one which does distinguish among ψ 1,2 : Σ = Σ s + τ 3 Σ v Clear Σ v obeys a homogeneous SD equation

7 To O(g 2, g 2 ) one finds There is symmetry breakdown if this equation admits a non-vanishing solution for Σ v.. Cornwall and Norton found a self consistent solution, in which Σ v. asymptotically behaves as: Σ v (p) ~ δm (p 2 /m 2 ) -ε with ε>0 p 2 where δm is arbitrary and ε obeys the constraint ε(1- ε) = [3/16π 2 ] (g 2 - g 2 )

8 Cornwall and Norton were also then able to compute the dynamically induced mass for the B µ gauge field. They did this computation in the weak coupling limit g 2 0, g 2 0 [ with ε = [3/16π 2 ] (g 2 - g 2 ) 0 simultaneously, to respect the dynamical constraint] Their result, as expected, relates the dynamically generated mass M B to the mass difference between the fermions δm, as this is the only mass parameter generated in the theory: M B 2 = [8 g 2 / 3(g 2 - g 2 )] δm 2

9 Technicolor and its Troubles In the late 70s, Weinberg and Susskind recognized that the dynamical symmetry breaking mechanism identified by Cornwall, Norton, Jackiw and Johnson was naturally provided by the non-vanishing QCD quark condensates <q q>~ Λ QCD 3 for the SU(2)XU(1) electroweak theory, except that their scale was too small since Λ QCD ~ GeV Susskind then proposed the existence of a QCD-like theory - Technicolor- with dynamical fermionic condensates <T T>~ (TeV) 3 which cause the electroweak theory to break down dynamically, giving M W ~ 100 GeV

10 In Technicolor, just as in QCD, a custodial SU (2) symmetry, the analog of isospin, exists and serves to guarantee that in the electroweak theory the dynamically generated gauge boson masses obey the, well satisfied, relation: M W2 =M Z2 cos 2 θ W where θ W is the electroweak mixing angle Although Technicolor provides an attractive alternative to introducing a scalar Higgs sector to break down the SU(2)XU(1) electroweak theory, present day data does not seem to favor this alternative

11 All electroweak data is consistent with the breakdown of the standard model being effected by a relatively light Higgs boson [Figure] Since the Higgs self coupling is given by λ=m H2 /2v 2 with v= ( 2G F ) -1/2 250 GeV, it is clear that electroweak data is consistent with a weakly coupled symmetry breaking sector This result suggests that, at high energy E>> M W, the scattering of longitudinally polarized gauge bosons itself will be weak: A << 1 W LWL

12

13 This result follows from a famous theorem established by Cornwall, Levin and Tiktopolous [Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 1145] which relates, for E>> M W, A W to the LWL corresponding Goldstone boson scattering amplitude A ww : A = A W LWL ww + O( M W /E) ~ λ [Higgs case] In Technicolor, which is a strong coupling theory like QCD, one would expect A to W LWL be large rather than small. However, this is just an indication against Technicolor not a proof that the electroweak theory is not broken down dynamically

14 Stronger indications against Technicolor can be garnered by looking at the modifications that the symmetry breaking sector induces to the gauge propagators [oblique corrections] Expanding the vector boson self energies as: Π (q 2 )=Π(0) + q 2 Π`(0) + it turns out that the combination S = -4π[Π`VV (0) - Π`AA (0)] = o ds/s [v(s)-a(s)] is particularly sensitive to the symmetry breaking sector. An analysis of all electroweak data by Erler and Langacker gives S= -0.1 ± 0.1

15 In QCD, with just u and d quarks, one can estimate the spectral function integral in S by saturating it with ρ and A 1 poles, obtaining S QCD 0.3 If Technicolor is QCD-like one expects a similar result, modulo techniflavor and technicolor factors : S Techni S QCD n N/3 1 Electroweak data disfavors a QCD-like Technicolor theory. But, more complicated theories [Walking Technicolor ] where α WT evolves slowly can give S WT << S Techni However, there are other problems!

16 Difficulties with CP In a theory without scalar fields, it is difficult to generate CP violating phenomena In 4 dimensions, a theory involving only fermions and gauge fields is CP-conserving at the Lagrangian level, up to θ-terms, since there are no natural complex structures in the theory: g i real; A µ a Adjoint Furthermore, θ-terms do not give the kind of CP violation that is observed in nature

17 Although the topological nature of the non- Abelian gauge theory vacuum allows the presence of CP-violating θ-terms, these terms are flavor neutral and troublesome does not contribute because θ W 0 θ S < since [edm] n < 6.3 x ecm Cannot see how any θ-term from a Technicolor theory will contribute to the observed flavorviolating CP phenomena in K and B decays

18 Nevertheless, it is possible to generate flavor changing CP violation in a Technicolor theory, as first discussed by Eichten, Lane and Peskin, because the Technicolor condensates <T T> can be complex The possibility of having complex condensates and, therefore, spontaneous breaking of CP was suggested originally by Dashen in 1971 in theories where global symmetries are both spontaneously G H and explicitly Ħ broken The correct ground state follows by minimizing an effective potential, and the minimum can occur for complex values of the condensates

19 In Technicolor theories to generate any flavor violating interactions one must introduce a further gauge theory (ETC) which becomes strong at higher scales than Technicolor and connects fermions and technifermions ETC interactions at low energy produce effective residual terms of the form which, when SU(2)xU(1) breaks down, generate mass matrices for the quarks, and which serve to break remaining global symm.

20 The correct ground state of this theory, following Dashen, arises from minimizing the effective potential [G H; g G] V(g)= - H <Ω U(g)-1 L residual U(g) Ω> H and generally gives complex condensates and, hence, complex quark mass matrices Unfortunately, as Eichten, Lane and Preskill showed, besides the ordinary CKM CP violation coming from the complex mass matrices, the aligned residual interactions can also give rise to flavor diagonal CP violation, leading to a too large neutron edm

21 Because the flavor aspects of Technicolor theories are complicated and quite model dependent, perhaps one can ignore these potential troubles However, in my view, one really cannot ignore a more general problem arising from having CP being spontaneously violated by complex condensates As Zeldovich, Kobzarev and Okun pointed out in 1974, spontaneous CP violation gives rise to different CP domains in the Universe and these in general spell trouble

22 The different CP domains in the Universe are separated by walls that have substantial energy density Furthermore, being 2-dimensional, the walls dissipate slowly as the Universe cools Roughly speaking, the surface energy density in the walls is of order σ ~ <T T>~ (TeV) 3 thus, if they existed, the walls would contribute an enormous amount to the energy density of the universe now: ρ wall ~ σt ~ 10-7 GeV 4 >> ρ closure ~ GeV 4

23 Unless one can find a mechanism to rapidly destroying the domain walls, one cannot countenance a theory with spontaneous CP violation below T~T inflation Theories where CP is violated at high scales exist [Nelson, Barr], but they are recondite and difficult to reconcile with experiment (which agrees perfectly with the CKM theory [Figure]) Typically, the CP violating phases generated at high scales induce small phases at low energy: γ eff ~ [M w /M HS ] n γ while γ CKM ~ O(1)

24

25 Concluding Remarks I have discussed some theoretical and phenomenological constraints which argue against the beautiful idea of Cornwall, Norton, Jackiw and Johnson that the electroweak theory is broken dynamically - electroweak data is consistent with having a light weakly coupled Higgs boson - CP violation is consistent with originating from explicit phases in the mass matrices coming from scalar Yukawa couplings

26 However, ultimately, we will know the truth only from experiment and not from theoretical arguments Fortunately, we are at the threshold of the turnon of the LHC, a machine which should really elucidate the nature of electroweak symmetry breaking So, the only thing left to do is to wait and wish Mike a Happy Birthday!