Theorems Geometry. Joshua Ruiter. April 8, 2018

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Theorems Geometry. Joshua Ruiter. April 8, 2018"

Transcription

1 Theorems Geometry Joshua Ruiter Aril 8, 2018 Aendix A: Toology Theorem 0.1. Let f : X Y be a continuous ma between toological saces. If K X is comact, then f(k) Y is comact. 1 Chater 1 Theorem 1.1 (Toological Invariance of Dimension). A nonemty n-dimensional toological manifold cannot be homeomorhic to an m-dimensional manifold unless m = n. Theorem 1.2. Every toological manifold has a countable basis of recomact oen balls. Theorem 1.3. Let M 1,..., M k be toological manifolds of dimensions n 1,..., n k resectively. The roduct sace i M i is a toological manifold of dimension i n i. For ( i ) i M i, we choose charts (U i, φ i ) in each M i with i U i and then the mas φ 1... φ k : i U i R n n k given by are the coordinate charts. ( 1,..., k ) (φ 1 ( 1 ),..., φ k ( k )) Theorem 1.4. Every toological manifold is locally comact. Theorem 1.5. Every toological manifold is aracomact. Theorem 1.6. A toological manifold has countably many comonents, each of which is an oen subset and a connected toological manifold. Theorem 1.7. Every smooth atlas for a manifold M is contained in a unique maximal smooth atlas. Theorem 1.8. Two smooth atlases for a manifold M determine the same smooth structure if and only if their union is a smooth atlas. 1

2 Theorem 1.9. Every smooth manifold has a countable basis of regular coordinate balls. Theorem Any oen subset U of a manifold M is also a manifold, by forming smooth charts for U by taking intersections of U with smooth charts for M. (It has the same dimension rovided U is nonemty.) Theorem Let M 1,..., M k be smooth manifolds of dimension n 1,..., n k resectively. Then the charts defined for the roduct manifold are smoothly comatible. Theorem 1.12 (Smooth Manifold Chart Lemma). Let M be a set and suose there is a collection {U α } of subsets and a collection of mas φ α : U α R n so that 1. φ α is a bijection with oen image in R n 2. φ α (U α U β ) is oen for every α, β 3. If U α U β, the ma φ β φ 1 α is smooth 4. A countable subcollection of U α is a cover for M 5. For, q M, either both are contained in some U α or there are disjoint U α, U β so that U α and q U β. Then M has a unique smooth manifold structure such that (U α, φ α ) are smooth charts. 2 Chater 2 Theorem 2.1. Let M be a smooth manifold and f : M R. Then f is smooth if and only if f is smooth in every smooth chart. Theorem 2.2. Let M be a smooth manifold. Then C (M) is a commutative ring (with ointwise addition and multilication). Theorem 2.3. Smooth mas are continuous. Theorem 2.4. Let M, N be manifolds and F : M N be a ma. equivalent: The following are 1. F is smooth. 2. For every M, there exist smooth charts (U, φ), (V, ψ) with U, F () V such that U F 1 (V ) is oen in M and ψ F φ 1 : φ(u F 1 (V )) ψ(v ) is smooth. 3. F is continuous and there exist smooth atlases {U α, φ α } for M and {V β, ψ β } for N such that ψ β F φ 1 α is smooth for all α, β. 4. For every M, there is a neighborhood U such that F U is smooth. 2

3 Theorem 2.5 (Gluing Lemma for Smooth Mas). Let M, N be smooth manifolds, and let {U α } α A be an oen cover for M. Suose that for each α A we have a smooth ma F α : U α N such that they agee on overlas, that is, F α Uα U β = F β Uα U β for all α, β. Then there is a unique smooth ma F : M N such that F Uα = F α for all α A. Theorem 2.6. Let M, N be smooth manifolds, and let F : M N be a ma. Then F is smooth if and only if every coordinate reresentation of F is smooth. Theorem 2.7. Constant mas are smooth. Theorem 2.8. The identity ma is smooth. Theorem 2.9. Inclusion mas are smooth. Theorem The comosition of smooth mas is smooth. Theorem Let M 1,..., M k be smooth manifolds. Let π i : k j=1 M j M i be the rojection ( 1,..., k ) i. A ma F = (F 1,... F k ) : N k i=1 M i is smooth if and only if each F i = π i F : N M i is smooth. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and (U, φ) be a smooth chart. Then φ : U φ(u) is a diffeomorhism. Theorem The comosition of diffeomorhisms is a diffeomorhism. Theorem Diffeomorhism is an equivalence relation on smooth manifolds. Theorem 2.15 (Diffeomorhism Invariance of Dimension). Smooth manifolds can only be diffeomorhic if they have the same dimension, unless one is emty (in which case both are emty). Theorem Let f : M R k. If x M \ su(f), then f(x) = 0. Note that we may have f(y) = 0 for y su(f). Proof. If f(x) 0, then x su(f). Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and X = {X α } α A an oen cover. Then there exists a smooth artition of unity subordinate to X. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and A, U be subsets with A U and A closed and U oen. Then there exists a smooth bum function for A suorted in U. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold, with A M closed and f : A R k a smooth function. Then for any oen subset U with A U, there exists a smooth function f : M R k such that f A = f and su F U. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold. Then there exists a smooth exhaustion function for M, that is, there exists a smooth function f : M R such that f 1 ((, a]) is comact for all a R. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and K a closed subset of M. Then there is a smooth nonnegative function f : M R such that f 1 (0) = K. 3

4 3 Chater 3 Theorem 3.1. Let M be a smooth manifold and M. Then T M is a vector sace (over R). Proof. Let v, w T M and a R. We need to show that v + w T M and av T M, so we need to show that v + w and av are derivations at. (v + w)(fg) = v(fg) + w(fg) = f()vg + g()vf + f()wg + g()wf Thus v + w is a derivation at. = f()(vg + wg) + g()(vf + wf) = f()(v + w)g + g()(v + w)f (av)(fg) = a(v(fg)) = a(f()vg + g()vf) = f()(avg) + g()(avf) Thus av is a derivation at. = g()(av)f + f()(av)g Theorem 3.2. Let M be a smooth manifold, and let M, v T M, and f, g C (M). If f is a constant function, then vf = 0. If f() = g() = 0, then v(fg) = 0. Proof. First suose that f is the constant function f() = 1. vf = v(ff) = f()vf + f()vf = 2vf = vf = 0 Then by linearity, if g() = c we have vg = v(cf) = c(vf) = c(0) = 0. The other assertion is obvious. Theorem 3.3. Let M, N be smooth manifolds, F : M N be smooth, and M. Then df (v) = F (v) is a derivation at F (). Theorem 3.4. Let M, N, P be smooth manifolds, and F : M N and G : N P be smooth mas, and let M. Then 1. df = F : T M T F () N is linear. 2. d(g F ) = dg F () df : T M T G F () P. In the other notation, (G F ) = G F 3. d(id M ) = (Id M ) = Id TM. 4. If F is a diffeomorhism, then df = F is an isomorhism, and (F ) 1 = (F 1 ). Theorem 3.5. Let M be a smooth manifold, M, and v T M. Let f, g C (M) and suose there is a neighborhood U of such that f(x) = g(x) for x U. Then vf = vg. Theorem 3.6. Let M be a smooth manifold and U M be oen. Let ι : U M be the inclusion ma. Then for U, the differential dι = ι : T U T M is an isomorhism. Theorem 3.7. Let M be a smooth n-manifold. Then for M, T M is an n-dimensional vector sace (over R). 4

5 Theorem 3.8. Let V be a finite-dimensional (real) vector sace with its standard smooth manifold structure. For a V the ma v D v a is a canonical isomorhism from V to T a V, and for any linear ma L : V W, the diagram commutes: V W L = = T a V L T La W Theorem 3.9. Let M 1,... M k be smooth manifolds and let π j : (M 1... M k ) M j be the rojection ( 1,... k ) j. Then is an isomorhism. α : T (M 1... M k ) T 1 M 1... T k M k α(v) = ((π 1 ) (v),..., (π k ) (v)) = (d(π 1 ) (v),..., d(π k ) (v)) Theorem Let R n. The derivations x 1, x 2,..., x n form a basis for T R n. Theorem Let M be a smooth n-manifold and M. Then T M is an n-dimensional (real) vector sace, and for any smooth chart (U, φ) = (U, (x 1,..., x n )) containing, the coordinate vectors x 1, x 2,..., x n form a basis for T M. Therefore, any v T M can be written as v = n i=1 v i x i Furthermore, x j : U R is a smooth function, so ( ) v(x j ) = v i (x j ) = v i xj () = x i vj xi Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and let F : M N be a smooth ma. Let (U, φ) be a chart for M with U and (V, ψ) be a chart for N with F () V. Let F = ψ F φ 1 be the coordinate reresentation of F and = φ() be the coordinate reresentation of. Then ( ) F = F j x i x ( ) i y j F () 5

6 That is, the matrix of the linear ma df = F is the Jacobian matrix of F at, F 1 F ()... 1 () x 1 x n..... F n F ()... n () x 1 x n Theorem 3.13 ( Chain Rule for Coordinate Changes). Let M be a smooth n-manifold and (U, φ) = (U, x i ) and (V, ψ) = (V, y i ) be two smooth charts. The change of basis from { } { } to is given by x i y i x i = n ( ) y j x ( ) i y j where = φ(). For v T M, we can write v in terms of both bases as v = a i x i = b i y i j=1 Then the relationshi between a i and b i is given by n ( ) y b i j = x ( ) i i=1 Theorem Let M be a smooth n-manifold. Then T M is a smooth manifold of dimension 2n. Theorem Let M be a smooth n-manifold such that M can be covered by a single smooth chart. Then T M is diffeomorhic to M R n. Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and F : M N be smooth. Then df : T M T N is smooth. Theorem Let M, N, P be smooth manifolds and F : M N, G : N P be smooth mas. Then 1. d(g F ) = dg df 2. d(id M ) = Id T M 3. If F is a diffeomorhism, then df : T M T N is also a diffeomorhism and (df ) 1 = d(f 1 ). Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and γ : J M be a smooth curve. Then for a function f C (M), γ (t 0 ) acts on f by ( ) γ d (t 0 )f = dγ f = d dt dt (f γ) = (f γ )(t 0 ) t0 t0 6 a i

7 Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and γ : J M be a smooth curve, and let t 0 J. Let (U, φ) be a smooth chart containing t 0, with φ() = (x 1 (),... x n ()). Then for t sufficiently close to t 0, we can write γ as γ(t) = (γ 1 (t),... γ n (t)) and then γ (t 0 ) = dγi dt (t 0) x i γ(t0 ) Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and M, and v T M. Then there exists a curve γ : ( ɛ, ɛ) M with γ(0) = and γ (0) = v for some ɛ > 0. Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma and let γ : J M be a smooth curve. For t 0 J, the velocity of F γ : J N at t 0 is (F γ) (t 0 ) = df (γ (t 0 )) Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma, and M and v T M. Then df (v) = F (v) = (F γ) (0) for any smooth curve γ : J M satisfying 0 J, γ(0) =, and γ (0) = v. 4 Chater 4 Theorem 4.1. Let F : M N. min(dim M, dim N). For all M, the rank of F at does not exceed Theorem 4.2. Let F : M N be a smooth ma and M. If df = F is surjective, then there is a neighborhood U of such that F U is a submersion. Similarly, if df = F is injective, then there is a neighborhood U of such that F U is an immersion. Theorem 4.3. Let M 1,... M k be smooth manifolds, and let π : M 1... M k M i be the rojection ( 1,..., k ) i. Then π i is a smooth submersion. Theorem 4.4. Let M be a smooth manifold and γ : J M a smooth curve. Then γ is a smooth immersion if and only if γ (t) is never zero. Theorem 4.5. Let M be a smooth manifold and T M the tangent bundle. Then the standard rojection π : T M M given by (, v) is a smooth submersion. Theorem 4.6. A comosition of surjective functions is surjective. Theorem 4.7. A comosition of injective functions is injective. Theorem 4.8. A comosition of smooth submersions is a smooth submersion. Theorem 4.9. A comosition of smooth immersions is a smooth immersion. 7

8 Theorem 4.10 (Proerties of Local Diffeomorhisms). 1. A comosition of local diffeomorhisms is a local diffeomorhism. 2. A finite roduct of local diffeomorhisms is a local diffeomorhism. 3. A bijective local diffeomorhism is a diffeomorhism. 4. A local diffeomorhism is a smooth immersion and a smooth submersion. Conversely, a ma that is a smooth submersion and smooth immersion is a local diffeomorhism. 5. A smooth immersion between manifolds of equal dimension is a local diffeomorhism. Likewise for smooth submersions. Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma. Then F is a local diffeomorhism if and only if it is both a smooth immersion and a smooth submersion. Consequently, if dim M = dim N and F is either a smooth sumbersion or a smooth immersion, then F is a local diffeomorhism. Theorem 4.12 (Inverse Function Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds and F : M N a smooth ma. If M such that df = F is invertible, then there are connected neighborhoods U 0 of and V 0 of F () such that F U0 : U 0 V 0 is a diffeomorhism. Theorem 4.13 (Rank Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds of dimension m, n resectively and F : M N a smooth ma with constant rank r. Then for M there exist smooth charts (U, φ) for M with U and (V, ψ) for N with F () V such that F (U) V and F has a coordinate reresentation of the form F (x 1,..., x r, x r+1,... x m ) = (x 1,..., x r, 0,... 0) In articular, if F is a smooth submersion, then and if F is a smooth immersion then F (x 1,... x n, x n+1,..., x m ) = (x 1,... x n ) f(x 1,..., x m ) = (x 1,..., x m, 0,..., 0) Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma and suose M is connected. Then the following are equivalent: 1. F has constant rank. 2. For M, there exist smooth charts (U, φ) and (V, ψ) with U, F () V, such that the coordinate reresentation F = ψ F φ 1 is linear. Theorem 4.15 (Global Rank Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds such that F : M N is a smooth ma of constant rank. Then 1. If F is surjective, then it is a smooth submersion. 8

9 2. If F is injective, then it is a smooth immersion. 3. If F is bijective, then it is a diffeomorhism. Theorem The comosition of smooth embeddings is a smooth embedding. Theorem If M is a smooth manifold and U M is an oen submanifold, then the inclusion ma is a smooth embedding. Theorem Let M 1,..., M k be smooth manifolds and i M i be oints. Then the ma ι j : M j i M i given by is a smooth embedding. ι j (q) = ( 1,..., j 1, q, j+1,..., k ) Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and F : M N be an injective smooth immersion. If any of the following holds, then F is a smooth embedding. 1. F is an oen or closed ma. 2. F is a roer ma. 3. M is comact. 4. M has emty boundary and dim M = dim N. Theorem 4.20 (Local Embedding Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds and F : M N be a smooth ma. Then F is a smooth immersion if and only if every M has a neighborhood U M such that F U : U N is a smooth embedding. Theorem 4.21 (Local Section Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds and π : M N a smooth ma. Then π is a smooth submersion if and only if every M is in the image of a local section of π. Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and π : M N a smooth submersion. Then π is an oen ma. If π is surjective, then it is a quotient ma. 5 Chater 5 Theorem 5.1. Let M be a smooth manifold. The embedded submanifolds of codimension zero in M are exactly the oen submanifolds. Theorem 5.2. Let M, N be smooth manifolds, and F : N M be a smooth embedding. Let S = F (N). Then with the subsace toology (from M), S is a toological manifold, and it has a unique smooth structure making it into an embedded submanifold of M with the roerty that F is a diffeomorhism between N and F (N). Theorem 5.3. Let M, N be smooth manifolds and let N. Then the slice M {} is an embedded submanifolds of M N, and it is diffeomorhic to M. 9

10 Theorem 5.4. Let M, N be smooth manifolds with dimension m, n resectively. Let U M be oen and f : U N be a smooth ma. Let Γ(f) M N be the grah of f. Then Γ(f) is an embedded m-dimensional submanifold of M N. Theorem 5.5. Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and S M an embedded submanifold. Then S is roerly embedded if and only if it is a closed subset of M. Theorem 5.6. Every comact embedded submanifold is roerly embedded. Theorem 5.7. Let M, N be smooth manifolds, where N may have boundary, and let f : M N be a smooth ma. Then Γ(f) is a roerly embedded submanifold of M N. Theorem 5.8 (Local Slice Criterion for Embedded Submanifolds). Let M be a smooth n- manifold. If S M is an embedded k-dimensional submanifold, then S satisfies the local k-slice condition. Conversely, if S M is a subset that satisfies the local k-slice condition, then S is a toological manifold with the subsace toology and has a smooth structure making it a k-dimensional embedded submanifold of M. Theorem 5.9. Let M be a smooth n-manifold with boundary, and give M the subsace toology. Then M is a toological (n 1)-dimensional submanifold (without boundary), and it has a unique smooth structure such that it is a roerly embedded submanifold of M. Theorem 5.10 (Constant-Rank Level Set Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds and let φ : M N be a smooth ma with constant rank r. Then every level set of φ is a roerly embedded submanifold of codimension r in M. Theorem 5.11 (Submersion Level Set Theorem). Let M, N be smooth manifolds and φ : M N be a smooth submersion. Then every level set of φ is a roerly embedded submanifold of M, with codimension equal to the dimension of N. Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and φ : M N a smooth ma. Suose that dim M < dim N. Then every oint in M is a critical oint of φ. Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and φ : M N a smooth submersion. Then every oint in M is a regular oint. Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds and φ : M N a smooth ma. The sets of regular oints of φ is an oen subset of M. Theorem 5.15 (Regular Level Set Theorem). Every regular level set of a smooth ma between smooth manifolds is a roerly embedded submanifold with codimension equal to the dimension of the codomain. Theorem Let S be a subset of a smooth m-manifold M. Then S is an embedded k-submanifold of M if and only if every oint of S has a neighborhood U M such that U S is a level set of a smooth submersion φ : U R m k. Theorem Every embedded submanifold is also an immersed submanifold. 10

11 Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary, and N be a smooth manifold, and F : M N an injective smooth immersion. Let S = F (N). Then S has a unique toology and smooth structure such that it is a smooth immersed submanifold of M and such that F : N S is a diffeomorhism. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and S M an immersed submanifold. If any of the following holds, then S is an embedded submanifold. 1. S has codimension zero in M. 2. The inclusion ma S M is roer. 3. S is comact. Theorem 5.20 (Immersed Submanifolds are Locally Embedded). Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and S M an immersed submanifold. Then for S, there exists a neighborhood U of with U S such that U is an embedded submanifold of M. Theorem Let M, N be smooth manifolds with or without boundary, and F : M N a smooth ma, and S M an immersed (or embedded) submanifold. Then F S : S N is smooth. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold without boundary, and S M an immersed submanifold, and F : N M a smooth ma such that f(n) S. If F is continuous as a ma from N S, then F : N S is smooth. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and S M an embedded submanifold. Then every smooth ma F : N M whose image is contained in S is also smooth as a ma from N to S. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and S M an immersed submanifold, and f C (S). Then 1. If S is embedded, then there exists a neighborhood U of S in M and a smooth function f C (U) such that f S = f. 2. If S is roerly embedded, then the neighborhood above can be taken to be all of M. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold with or without bondary, and S M an immersed (or embedded) submanifold, and S. Then for v T M, we have v T S if and only if there is a smooth curve γ : J M whose image is contained in S, where γ is also smooth as a ma into S, such that 0 J, γ(0) =, and γ (0) = v. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and S M an embedded submanifold, and S. As a subsace of T M, the tangent sace T S is recisely T S = {v T M : vf = 0 whenever f C (M) and f s = 0} Theorem Let M be a smooth n-manifold with boundary, and let M and (x i ) be smooth boundary coordinates on a neighborhood of. Write v T M as v i. Then x i v is inward ointing v n > 0 v is outward ointing v n < 0 v T ( M) v n = 0 11

12 6 Chater 6 Theorem 6.1. Let A R n with m(a) = 0 and F : A R n be a smooth ma. Then m(f (A)) = 0. Theorem 6.2. Let F : M N be a smooth ma between smooth manifolds. If A M has measure zero, then F (A) N has measure zero. Theorem 6.3 (Sard s Theorem). Let F : M N be a smooth ma between smooth manifolds. The set of critical values of F has measure zero. Theorem 6.4 (Corollary to Sard s Theorem). Let F : M N be a smooth ma between smooth manifolds. If dim M < dim N, then F (M) has measure zero in N. 7 Chater 7 Theorem 7.1. If G is a smooth manifold with a grou structure such that the ma (g, h) gh 1 is smooth, then G is a Lie grou. Theorem 7.2. Every Lie grou homomorhism has constant rank. Theorem 7.3. A Lie grou homomorhism is a Lie grou isomorhism if and only if it is bijective. Theorem 7.4. Let G be a Lie grou and W G an oen neighborhood of the identity. Then W generates an oen subgrou of G. If W is connected, it generates a connected oen subgrou of G. If G is connected, then W generates G. Theorem 7.5. Let G be a Lie grou and let G 0 be the connected comonent containing the identity. Then G 0 is a normal subgrou of G and it is the only connected oen subgrou. Every connected comonent of G is diffeomorhic to G 0. Theorem 7.6. Let F : G H be a Lie grou homomorhism. Then ker F is a roerly embedded Lie subgrou of G, with codimension equal to rank F. Theorem 7.7. Let F : G H be an injective Lie grou homomorhism. Then im F has a unique smooth manifold structure such that it is a Lie subgrou of H and F : G im F is a Lie grou isomorhism. Theorem 7.8 (Equivariant Rank Theorem). Let G be a Lie grou and let M, N be smooth manifolds such that G acts transitively (and smoothly) on M and N. If F : M N is a smooth equivariant ma, then F has constant rank. 8 Chater 8 Theorem 8.1 (Smoothness Criterion for Vector Fields). Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and X : M T M a rough vector field. If (U, x i ) is a smooth chart on M, then the restriction of X to U is smooth if and only if its comonent functions with resect to U are smooth. 12

13 Theorem 8.2 (Extension Lemma for Vector Fields). Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and let A M be a closed subset. Suose X is a smooth vector field on A. If U is an oen subset containing A, then there is a smooth global vector field X on M such that X A = X and su X U. Theorem 8.3. Let M be a smooth manifold with or without boundary and let X : M T M be a rough vector field. The following are equivalent: 1. X is smooth. 2. For every f C (M), the function Xf is smooth. 3. For every oen subset U M and every f C (M), the function Xf is smooth on U. Theorem 8.4. A ma D : C (M) C (M) is a derivation if and only if it is of the form Df = Xf for a smooth vector field X X(M). Theorem 8.5. Let F : M N be a smooth ma and X X(M) and Y X(N). Then X and Y are F -related if and only if for every smooth real-valued function f defined on an oen subset of N we have X(f F ) = (Y f) F Theorem 8.6. Let F : M N be a diffeomorhism. Then for every X X(M), there is a unique smooth vector field on N that is F -related to X. Theorem 8.7 (Coordinate Formula for Lie Bracket of Vector Fields). Let X, Y X(M), and let (U, x i be a smooth chart for M. We can write X = X i and Y = Y i on U. x i x i Then the coordinate exression for [X, Y ] is given by [X, Y ] = (X i Y j x i Y i Xj x i ) x j = (XY j Y X j ) x j Theorem 8.8. Let M be a smooth manifold and (U, x i ) be local coordinates. Then [ ] x, = 0 i x j Theorem 8.9 (Proerties of the Lie Bracket). The Lie bracket of vector fields is bilinear, antisymmetric, and satisfies the Jacobi identity. For f, g C (M), [fx, gy ] = fg[x, Y ] + (fxg)y (gy f)x Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma, and let X 1, X 2 X(M) and Y 1, Y 2 X(N) such that X 1 is F -related to Y 1 and X 2 is F -related to Y 2. Then [X 1, X 2 ] is F -related to [Y 1, Y 2 ]. Theorem Let F : M N be a diffeomorhism and X 1, X 2 X(M). Then F [X 1, X 2 ] = [F X 1, F X 2 ] 13

14 Theorem Let G be a Lie grou. The set of left-invariant smooth vector fields on G is a Lie algebra under the above bracket. That is, it is a vector sace and closed under brackets. Theorem Let G be a Lie grou. Define ɛ : Lie(G) T e G by ɛ(x) = X e. Then ɛ is a vector sace isomorhism. Thus dim Lie(G) = dim G. Theorem Every Lie grou is arallelizable. 9 Chater 9 Theorem 9.1. Let V be a smooth vector field on a smooth manifold M. For M, there exists ɛ > 0 and a smooth curve γ : ( ɛ, ɛ) M so that γ is an integral curve of V, with γ(0) =. Theorem 9.2. Let F : M N be a smooth ma and X X(M) and Y X(N). Then X and Y are F -related if and only if F mas integral curves of X to integral curves of Y. That is, if γ is an integral curve of X, then F γ is an integral curve of Y. Theorem 9.3. Let θ : R M M be a smooth global flow on M. The infinitesimal generator of θ is a smooth vector field on M, and each curve θ is an integral curve of V. Theorem 9.4. Let θ : D M be a smooth flow. The infinitesimal generator of θ is a smooth vector field and the curves θ are integral curves of V. Theorem 9.5 (Fundamental Theorem of Flows). Let V be a smooth vector field on M. There is a unique smooth maximal flow θ : D M whose infinitesimal generator is V. For this flow, θ is a maximal integral curve of V. Theorem 9.6. Let F : M N be a smooth ma and X X(M) and Y X(N). Let θ be the flow of X and η the flow of Y. If X and Y are F -related, then the diagram commutes. M t θ t M t F N t η t F N t Theorem 9.7 (Diffeomorhism Invariance of Flows). Let F : M N be a diffeomorhism. If X X(M) and θ is the flow of X, then the flow of F X is η t = F θ t F 1. Theorem 9.8. Let V be a smooth vector field on M. Suose there exists ɛ > 0 such that for every M, the domain of θ contains ( ɛ, ɛ). Then V is comlete. Theorem 9.9. Every comactly suorted smooth vector field is comlete. Theorem On a comact manifold, every smooth vector field is comlete. Theorem Every left-invariant vector field on a Lie grou is comlete. 14

15 Theorem Let V be a smooth vector field on M and let θ : D M be the flow of V. If M is a regular oint, then θ : D M is a smooth immersion. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and V, W X(M). The following are equivalent: V and W commute, V is invariant under the flow of W, and W is invariant under the flow of V. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold, and let V X(M). A smooth covariant tensor field A is invariant under the flow of V if and only if L V A = Chater 10 Theorem Let E be a smooth vector bundle over M. The rojection ma π : E M is a smooth submersion. Theorem The tangent bundle is a vector bundle. Theorem Let π : E M be a smooth vector bundle of rank k over M. Suose φ : π 1 (U) U R k and ψ : π 1 (V ) V R k are local trivializations such that U V. Then there is a smooth function τ : U V GL(k, R) such that Such a ma τ is called a transition function. φ ψ 1 (, v) = (, τ()v) Theorem A vector field is a global section of the tangent bundle. 11 Chater 11 Theorem Let V be a finite-dimensional vector sace. If (E 1,..., E n ) is a basis of V, then define ɛ i : V R by ɛ i (E j ) = δ j i. Then (ɛ1,..., ɛ n ) is a basis for V, called the dual basis. Theorem The assignment that sends a vector sace to its dual sace and a linear ma to its dual ma is a contravariant functor from the category of real vector saces to itself. Theorem Let V be a finite-dimensional vector sace and define ξ : V V by defining ξ(v) : V R to be the ma ξ(v)(ω) = ω(v). Then ξ is a vector sace isomorhism. ( ) Theorem If (U, x i ) is a smooth chart for a manifold, then is a basis for T x i M, and its dual basis is (dx i ). Theorem Let F C (M). comonent of M. Then df = 0 if and only if f is constant on each Theorem 11.6 (Pullback Commutes with d). Let F : M N be a smooth ma, and let u C (M) and ω be a 1-form on N. Then F (du) = d(u F ) 15

16 Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma and let ω be a 1-form on N. Let (U, x i ) a smooth chart on M and (V, y j ) be a smooth chart on N with F (U) V. Then we can write ω as ω = ω j dy j, and 12 Chater Chater Chater 14 F ω = (ω j F )d(y j F ) = (ω j F )df j Theorem 14.1 (Proerties of Elementary k-covectors). Let (E i ) be a basis for V and (ɛ i ) the dual basis, and I a multi-index. If I has a reeated index, ɛ I = 0. If J = I σ for some σ S k, then ɛ I = (sgn σ)ɛ J. Also, ɛ I (E j1,..., E jk ) = δ I J Theorem Let V be an n-dimensional vector sace. If (ɛ i ) is a basis for V, then the collection {ɛ I : I is an increasing multi-index of length k} is a basis for Λ k (V ). Theorem Let I, J be multi-indices. Then ɛ I ɛ J = ɛ IJ. Theorem 14.4 (Proerties of Wedge Product). The wedge roduct is bilinear, associative, and anti-commutative. The anticommutative roerty says that where k, l are the resective degrees of ω, η. ω η = ( 1) kl (η ω) Theorem Let V be an n-dimensional vector sace. If (ɛ i ) is a basis for V, then As a result, ɛ i 1... ɛ i k = ɛ I ω 1... ω k (v 1,..., v k ) = det(ω j (v i )) Theorem 14.6 (Proerties of Interior Multilication). Let V be a finite-dimensional vector sace and v V. Then i v i v = 0, and for ω Λ k (V ) and η Λ l (V ) we have More generally, i v (ω η) = (i v ω) η + ( 1) k ω (i v η) = (v ω) η + ( 1) k ω (v η) v (ω 1... ω k ) = k ( 1) (i 1) ω i (v)ω 1... ω i... ω k i=1 16

17 Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma. Then F (ω η) = F ω F η. In a smooth chart (V, y i ) for N, we have ( ) F ω I dy i 1... dy i k = (ω I F )d(y i 1 F )... d(y i k F ) I I Theorem 14.8 (Pullback for To Degree Forms). Let F : M N be smooth. Let (U, x i ) be a chart for M and (V, y i ) be a chart for N, and f C (V ). Then on U F 1 (V ), we have F (udy 1... dy n ) = (u F )(det J(F ))dx 1... dx n (Note that J(F ) is the Jacobian of F in these coordinates.) Theorem If (U, x i ) and (V, y j ) are overlaing charts on M, then on U V we have ( ) dy dy 1... dy n j = det dx 1... dx n dx i Theorem The exterior derivative exists and is unique. Theorem Let F : M N be a smooth ma. For each k, the ma F : Ω k (N) Ω k (M) commutes with d. That is, F (dω) = d(f (ω) Theorem Every exact form is closed. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold and V X (M). A smooth covariant tensor field A is invariant under the flow of V if and only if L V A = 0. Theorem (Cartan s Magic Formula). Let M be a smooth manifold and V a smooth vector field on M, and ω a differential form on M. Then 15 Chater 15 L V ω = V (dω) + d(v ω) Theorem Let M be a smooth n-manifold. Any nonvanishing n-form on M determines a unique orientation on M. Conversely, if M is oriented, there is a smooth nonvanish n-form on M that determines that orientation. Theorem Let M be an oriented smooth manifold and D M a smooth codimesion-0 (immersed) submanifold. The orientation on M restricts to an orientation on D. If ω is an orientation form for M, then ι ω is an orientation form for D. (ι : D M is the inclusion ma.) Theorem Let F : M N be a local diffeomorhism and N be oriented. Then M has a unique orientation such that F is orientation reserving. Theorem Every arallelizable manifold is orientable. Theorem Let M be an oriented smooth n-manifold with boundary. The M is orientable, and all outward-ointing vector fields along M determine the same orientation on M. 17

18 16 Chater 16 Theorem Let U and V be oen sets in R n and let G : U V be an orientationreserving diffeomorhism. If ω is a comactly suorted n-form on V, then G ω = ω If G is orientation reversing instead of orientation reserving, then G ω = ω U U Theorem 16.2 (Proerties of Integrals). Let M, N be non-emty oriented smooth n-manifold and ω, η comactly suorted n-forms on M, and let a, b R. Denote M with oosite orientation by M. Then aω + bη = a M M = M ω is ositively oriented = V V M ω + b η M M ω ω > 0 Theorem If F : M N is an orientation reserving diffeomorhism, then ω = F ω If F is orientation reversing instead, then ω = M M Theorem Let M be an oriented smooth n-manifold and ω a comactly suorted n- form on M. Suose D 1,..., D k are oen domains of integration in R n and we have smooth mas F i : D i M satisfying 1. F i restricts to an orientation reserving diffeomorhism from D i to an oen subset W i M. 2. W i W j = for i j. 3. su ω W 1... W k N N F ω Then M ω = k i=1 D i F ω 18

19 The above theorem says, in an overly comlicated way, that if we arametrize our manifold M by finitely many charts that don t overla, then we can integrate ω over M by integrating the ullback of ω on each chart. All the technicalities of the theorem say that you don t actually need to arametrize the whole manifold - you just need to arametrize the art where ω is nonzero, and you can throw away sets of measure zero, because they don t affect integration. Theorem 16.5 (Stokes s Theorem). Let M be an oriented smooth n-manifold with boundary, and let ω be a comactly suorted smooth (n 1) form on M. Then dω = ω M The ω on the RHS actually means ι ω where ι : M M is the inclusion. If M =, then the RHS is zero. M 17 Chater 17 Theorem Diffeomorhic smooth manifolds have isomorhic de Rhan cohomology grous. Theorem Let M be a smooth manifold, written as a disjoint union of its connected comonents, M = i M i. Then H n (M) = i Hn (M i ). The above theorem means that it is trivial to comute the de Rham cohomology of a disjoint union if we know the cohomologies of the ieces. Theorem Let M be connected. Then H 0 (M) = R. Theorem Let M and N are homotoy equivalent manifolds, then H n (M) = H n (N) for all n. Theorem If M is a contractible smooth manifold, then H n (M) = 0 for n 1. Theorem 17.6 (Poincare Lemma). If U is a star-shaed oen subset of R n, then H n (U) = 0 for 1. Theorem The de Rham cohomology of R k is given by { H n (R k R n = 1 ) = 0 n 1 Theorem Let M be a connected smooth manifold. Then φ : H 1 (M) Hom(π 1 (M), R) is well-defined and injective. Theorem If M is a connected smooth manifold with finite fundamental grou, then H 1 (M) = 0. 19

20 Theorem If M is a comact connected oriented smooth n-manifold, then H n (M) = R. Theorem Let f : M N be a smooth ma between smooth manifolds. If dim M < dim N, then f is not surjective. Proof. Every oint in M is critical, since rank df < dim M < dim T f() N. Thus f(m) has measure zero by Sard s Theorem. Hence f(m) N. 20

CHAPTER 2: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Introduction In this chapter we introduce smooth maps between manifolds, and some important

CHAPTER 2: SMOOTH MAPS. 1. Introduction In this chapter we introduce smooth maps between manifolds, and some important CHAPTER 2: SMOOTH MAPS DAVID GLICKENSTEIN 1. Introduction In this chater we introduce smooth mas between manifolds, and some imortant concets. De nition 1. A function f : M! R k is a smooth function if

More information

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURES 9-10,

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURES 9-10, DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY. LECTURES 9-10, 23-26.06.08 Let us rovide some more details to the definintion of the de Rham differential. Let V, W be two vector bundles and assume we want to define an oerator

More information

ε i (E j )=δj i = 0, if i j, form a basis for V, called the dual basis to (E i ). Therefore, dim V =dim V.

ε i (E j )=δj i = 0, if i j, form a basis for V, called the dual basis to (E i ). Therefore, dim V =dim V. Covectors Definition. Let V be a finite-dimensional vector sace. A covector on V is real-valued linear functional on V, that is, a linear ma ω : V R. The sace of all covectors on V is itself a real vector

More information

Math 751 Lecture Notes Week 3

Math 751 Lecture Notes Week 3 Math 751 Lecture Notes Week 3 Setember 25, 2014 1 Fundamental grou of a circle Theorem 1. Let φ : Z π 1 (S 1 ) be given by n [ω n ], where ω n : I S 1 R 2 is the loo ω n (s) = (cos(2πns), sin(2πns)). Then

More information

SECTION 5: FIBRATIONS AND HOMOTOPY FIBERS

SECTION 5: FIBRATIONS AND HOMOTOPY FIBERS SECTION 5: FIBRATIONS AND HOMOTOPY FIBERS In this section we will introduce two imortant classes of mas of saces, namely the Hurewicz fibrations and the more general Serre fibrations, which are both obtained

More information

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds

Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Chapter 1. Smooth Manifolds Theorem 1. [Exercise 1.18] Let M be a topological manifold. Then any two smooth atlases for M determine the same smooth structure if and only if their union is a smooth atlas.

More information

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim

Math 868 Final Exam. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each). Y (φ t ) Y lim SOLUTIONS Dec 13, 218 Math 868 Final Exam In this exam, all manifolds, maps, vector fields, etc. are smooth. Part 1. Complete 5 of the following 7 sentences to make a precise definition (5 points each).

More information

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE

LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE LECTURE: KOBORDISMENTHEORIE, WINTER TERM 2011/12; SUMMARY AND LITERATURE JOHANNES EBERT 1.1. October 11th. 1. Recapitulation from differential topology Definition 1.1. Let M m, N n, be two smooth manifolds

More information

MATH 6210: SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM SET #3

MATH 6210: SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM SET #3 MATH 6210: SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEM SET #3 Rudin, Chater 4, Problem #3. The sace L (T) is searable since the trigonometric olynomials with comlex coefficients whose real and imaginary arts are rational form

More information

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds

Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds MA 755 Fall 05. Notes #1. I. Kogan. Manifolds and tangent bundles. Vector fields and flows. 1 Differential manifolds, smooth maps, submanifolds Definition 1 An n-dimensional C k -differentiable manifold

More information

Quaternionic Projective Space (Lecture 34)

Quaternionic Projective Space (Lecture 34) Quaternionic Projective Sace (Lecture 34) July 11, 2008 The three-shere S 3 can be identified with SU(2), and therefore has the structure of a toological grou. In this lecture, we will address the question

More information

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California

Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring Francis Bonahon. Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California Notes for Math 535 Differential Geometry Spring 2016 Francis Bonahon Department of Mathematics, University of Southern California Date of this version: April 27, 2016 c Francis Bonahon 2016 CHAPTER 1 A

More information

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39)

i = f iα : φ i (U i ) ψ α (V α ) which satisfy 1 ) Df iα = Df jβ D(φ j φ 1 i ). (39) 2.3 The derivative A description of the tangent bundle is not complete without defining the derivative of a general smooth map of manifolds f : M N. Such a map may be defined locally in charts (U i, φ

More information

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f))

fy (X(g)) Y (f)x(g) gy (X(f)) Y (g)x(f)) = fx(y (g)) + gx(y (f)) fy (X(g)) gy (X(f)) 1. Basic algebra of vector fields Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over R. Recall that V = {L : V R} is defined to be the set of all linear maps to R. V is isomorphic to V, but there is no canonical

More information

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X.

B 1 = {B(x, r) x = (x 1, x 2 ) H, 0 < r < x 2 }. (a) Show that B = B 1 B 2 is a basis for a topology on X. Math 6342/7350: Topology and Geometry Sample Preliminary Exam Questions 1. For each of the following topological spaces X i, determine whether X i and X i X i are homeomorphic. (a) X 1 = [0, 1] (b) X 2

More information

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, )

Eilenberg-Steenrod properties. (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, ) II.3 : Eilenberg-Steenrod properties (Hatcher, 2.1, 2.3, 3.1; Conlon, 2.6, 8.1, 8.3 8.5 Definition. Let U be an open subset of R n for some n. The de Rham cohomology groups (U are the cohomology groups

More information

LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES

LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES LECTURE 15-16: PROPER ACTIONS AND ORBIT SPACES 1. Proper actions Suppose G acts on M smoothly, and m M. Then the orbit of G through m is G m = {g m g G}. If m, m lies in the same orbit, i.e. m = g m for

More information

Math 423 Course Notes

Math 423 Course Notes Math 423 Course Notes David Rose October 18, 2003 Contents 1 Smooth Manifolds 3 1.1 Definitions and Examples.................... 3 1.2 Morphisms of Manifolds..................... 5 1.3 Partitions of Unity........................

More information

Integration and Manifolds

Integration and Manifolds Integration and Manifolds Course No. 100 311 Fall 2007 Michael Stoll Contents 1. Manifolds 2 2. Differentiable Maps and Tangent Spaces 8 3. Vector Bundles and the Tangent Bundle 13 4. Orientation and Orientability

More information

CHAPTER 5 TANGENT VECTORS

CHAPTER 5 TANGENT VECTORS CHAPTER 5 TANGENT VECTORS In R n tangent vectors can be viewed from two ersectives (1) they cature the infinitesimal movement along a ath, the direction, and () they oerate on functions by directional

More information

Stone Duality for Skew Boolean Algebras with Intersections

Stone Duality for Skew Boolean Algebras with Intersections Stone Duality for Skew Boolean Algebras with Intersections Andrej Bauer Faculty of Mathematics and Physics University of Ljubljana Andrej.Bauer@andrej.com Karin Cvetko-Vah Faculty of Mathematics and Physics

More information

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1

Exercises in Geometry II University of Bonn, Summer semester 2015 Professor: Prof. Christian Blohmann Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 Assistant: Saskia Voss Sheet 1 1. Conformal change of Riemannian metrics [3 points] Let (M, g) be a Riemannian manifold. A conformal change is a nonnegative function λ : M (0, ). Such a function defines

More information

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final

Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final Math 225B: Differential Geometry, Final Ian Coley March 5, 204 Problem Spring 20,. Show that if X is a smooth vector field on a (smooth) manifold of dimension n and if X p is nonzero for some point of

More information

3 Properties of Dedekind domains

3 Properties of Dedekind domains 18.785 Number theory I Fall 2016 Lecture #3 09/15/2016 3 Proerties of Dedekind domains In the revious lecture we defined a Dedekind domain as a noetherian domain A that satisfies either of the following

More information

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1

M4P52 Manifolds, 2016 Problem Sheet 1 Problem Sheet. Let X and Y be n-dimensional topological manifolds. Prove that the disjoint union X Y is an n-dimensional topological manifold. Is S S 2 a topological manifold? 2. Recall that that the discrete

More information

Geometry Qualifying Exam Notes

Geometry Qualifying Exam Notes Geometry Qualifying Exam Notes F 1 F 1 x 1 x n Definition: The Jacobian matrix of a map f : N M is.. F m F m x 1 x n square matrix, its determinant is called the Jacobian determinant.. When this is a Definition:

More information

Lie algebra cohomology

Lie algebra cohomology Lie algebra cohomology Relation to the de Rham cohomology of Lie groups Presented by: Gazmend Mavraj (Master Mathematics and Diploma Physics) Supervisor: J-Prof. Dr. Christoph Wockel (Section Algebra and

More information

Elements of differential geometry

Elements of differential geometry Elements of differential geometry R.Beig (Univ. Vienna) ESI-EMS-IAMP School on Mathematical GR, 28.7. - 1.8. 2014 1. tensor algebra 2. manifolds, vector and covector fields 3. actions under diffeos and

More information

LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES

LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES LECTURE 6: FIBER BUNDLES In this section we will introduce the interesting class o ibrations given by iber bundles. Fiber bundles lay an imortant role in many geometric contexts. For examle, the Grassmaniann

More information

arxiv:math/ v4 [math.gn] 25 Nov 2006

arxiv:math/ v4 [math.gn] 25 Nov 2006 arxiv:math/0607751v4 [math.gn] 25 Nov 2006 On the uniqueness of the coincidence index on orientable differentiable manifolds P. Christoher Staecker October 12, 2006 Abstract The fixed oint index of toological

More information

Transversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2

Transversality. Abhishek Khetan. December 13, Basics 1. 2 The Transversality Theorem 1. 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2 Transversality Abhishek Khetan December 13, 2017 Contents 1 Basics 1 2 The Transversality Theorem 1 3 Transversality and Homotopy 2 4 Intersection Number Mod 2 4 5 Degree Mod 2 4 1 Basics Definition. Let

More information

Reminder on basic differential geometry

Reminder on basic differential geometry Reminder on basic differential geometry for the mastermath course of 2013 Charts Manifolds will be denoted by M, N etc. One should think of a manifold as made out of points (while the elements of a vector

More information

ON THE PROLONGATION OF FIBER BUNDLES AND INFINITESIMAL STRUCTURES ( 1 )

ON THE PROLONGATION OF FIBER BUNDLES AND INFINITESIMAL STRUCTURES ( 1 ) Du rolongement des esaces fibrés et des structures infinitésimales, Ann. Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 17, 1 (1967), 157-223. ON THE PROLONGATION OF FIBER BUNDLES AND INFINITESIMAL STRUCTURES ( 1 ) By Ngô Van

More information

NOTES ON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO

NOTES ON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO NOTES ON MANIFOLDS ALBERTO S. CATTANEO Contents 1. Introduction 2 2. Manifolds 2 2.1. Coordinates 6 2.2. Dimension 7 2.3. The implicit function theorem 7 3. Maps 8 3.1. The pullback 10 3.2. Submanifolds

More information

DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY AND THE POINCARÉ-HOPF THEOREM

DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY AND THE POINCARÉ-HOPF THEOREM DIFFERENTIAL TOPOLOGY AND THE POINCARÉ-HOPF THEOREM ARIEL HAFFTKA 1. Introduction In this paper we approach the topology of smooth manifolds using differential tools, as opposed to algebraic ones such

More information

The Algebra of Tensors; Tensors on a Vector Space Definition. Suppose V 1,,V k and W are vector spaces. A map. F : V 1 V k

The Algebra of Tensors; Tensors on a Vector Space Definition. Suppose V 1,,V k and W are vector spaces. A map. F : V 1 V k The Algebra of Tensors; Tensors on a Vector Space Definition. Suppose V 1,,V k and W are vector spaces. A map F : V 1 V k is said to be multilinear if it is linear as a function of each variable seperately:

More information

CHAPTER 3: TANGENT SPACE

CHAPTER 3: TANGENT SPACE CHAPTER 3: TANGENT SPACE DAVID GLICKENSTEIN 1. Tangent sace We shall de ne the tangent sace in several ways. We rst try gluing them together. We know vectors in a Euclidean sace require a baseoint x 2

More information

Notes on quotients and group actions

Notes on quotients and group actions Notes on quotients and group actions Erik van den Ban Fall 2006 1 Quotients Let X be a topological space, and R an equivalence relation on X. The set of equivalence classes for this relation is denoted

More information

Let V, W be two finite-dimensional vector spaces over R. We are going to define a new vector space V W with two properties:

Let V, W be two finite-dimensional vector spaces over R. We are going to define a new vector space V W with two properties: 5 Tensor products We have so far encountered vector fields and the derivatives of smooth functions as analytical objects on manifolds. These are examples of a general class of objects called tensors which

More information

Manifolds (CM437Z/CMMS18)

Manifolds (CM437Z/CMMS18) Manifolds (CM437Z/CMMS18) Neil Lambert Deartment of Mathematics King s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS, U. K. Email: lambert@mth.kcl.ac.uk Contents 1 Manifolds 2 1.1 Elementary Toology and Definitions....................

More information

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY

INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY INTRODUCTION TO ALGEBRAIC GEOMETRY WEI-PING LI 1 Preliminary of Calculus on Manifolds 11 Tangent Vectors What are tangent vectors we encounter in Calculus? (1) Given a parametrised curve α(t) = ( x(t),

More information

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS

class # MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS class # 34477 MATH 7711, AUTUMN 2017 M-W-F 3:00 p.m., BE 128 A DAY-BY-DAY LIST OF TOPICS [DG] stands for Differential Geometry at https://people.math.osu.edu/derdzinski.1/courses/851-852-notes.pdf [DFT]

More information

SECTION 12: HOMOTOPY EXTENSION AND LIFTING PROPERTY

SECTION 12: HOMOTOPY EXTENSION AND LIFTING PROPERTY SECTION 12: HOMOTOPY EXTENSION AND LIFTING PROPERTY In the revious section, we exloited the interlay between (relative) CW comlexes and fibrations to construct the Postnikov and Whitehead towers aroximating

More information

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M =

CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS. 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = CALCULUS ON MANIFOLDS 1. Riemannian manifolds Recall that for any smooth manifold M, dim M = n, the union T M = a M T am, called the tangent bundle, is itself a smooth manifold, dim T M = 2n. Example 1.

More information

satisfying the following condition: If T : V V is any linear map, then µ(x 1,,X n )= det T µ(x 1,,X n ).

satisfying the following condition: If T : V V is any linear map, then µ(x 1,,X n )= det T µ(x 1,,X n ). ensities Although differential forms are natural objects to integrate on manifolds, and are essential for use in Stoke s theorem, they have the disadvantage of requiring oriented manifolds in order for

More information

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS

A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS A MARSDEN WEINSTEIN REDUCTION THEOREM FOR PRESYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS FRANCESCO BOTTACIN Abstract. In this paper we prove an analogue of the Marsden Weinstein reduction theorem for presymplectic actions of

More information

SISSA Differential Geometry

SISSA Differential Geometry SISSA Differential Geometry Boris DUBROVIN Contents 1 Geometry of Manifolds 3 1.1 Definition of smooth manifolds.......................... 3 1.2 Tangent space to a manifold............................

More information

LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY

LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY LECTURE 11: TRANSVERSALITY Let f : M N be a smooth map. In the past three lectures, we are mainly studying the image of f, especially when f is an embedding. Today we would like to study the pre-image

More information

An Introduction to Riemannian Geometry

An Introduction to Riemannian Geometry An Introduction to Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Mechanics and Relativity Leonor Godinho and José Natário Lisbon, 2004 Contents Chapter 1. Differentiable Manifolds 3 1. Topological Manifolds

More information

Differential Geometry

Differential Geometry Differential Geometry by Will Merry Lecture notes based on the Differential Geometry course lectured by Prof. P.M.H. Wilson in Michaelmas term 2007 for Part III of the Cambridge Mathematical Tripos. Contents

More information

Elementary Analysis in Q p

Elementary Analysis in Q p Elementary Analysis in Q Hannah Hutter, May Szedlák, Phili Wirth November 17, 2011 This reort follows very closely the book of Svetlana Katok 1. 1 Sequences and Series In this section we will see some

More information

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit

Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit Differential Geometry qualifying exam 562 January 2019 Show all your work for full credit 1. (a) Show that the set M R 3 defined by the equation (1 z 2 )(x 2 + y 2 ) = 1 is a smooth submanifold of R 3.

More information

THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM

THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM THE JORDAN-BROUWER SEPARATION THEOREM WOLFGANG SCHMALTZ Abstract. The Classical Jordan Curve Theorem says that every simple closed curve in R 2 divides the plane into two pieces, an inside and an outside

More information

10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces.

10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10. The subgroup subalgebra correspondence. Homogeneous spaces. 10.1. The concept of a Lie subgroup of a Lie group. We have seen that if G is a Lie group and H G a subgroup which is at the same time a

More information

MATH 210A, FALL 2017 HW 5 SOLUTIONS WRITTEN BY DAN DORE

MATH 210A, FALL 2017 HW 5 SOLUTIONS WRITTEN BY DAN DORE MATH 20A, FALL 207 HW 5 SOLUTIONS WRITTEN BY DAN DORE (If you find any errors, lease email ddore@stanford.edu) Question. Let R = Z[t]/(t 2 ). Regard Z as an R-module by letting t act by the identity. Comute

More information

Differential Geometry II

Differential Geometry II Technische Universität Berlin Institut für Mathematik Differential Geometry II Analysis and geometry on manifolds Prof. Dr. Ulrich Pinkall Lecture notes Dr. Felix Knöppel November 22, 2018 Contents 1

More information

Theorem 3.11 (Equidimensional Sard). Let f : M N be a C 1 map of n-manifolds, and let C M be the set of critical points. Then f (C) has measure zero.

Theorem 3.11 (Equidimensional Sard). Let f : M N be a C 1 map of n-manifolds, and let C M be the set of critical points. Then f (C) has measure zero. Now we investigate the measure of the critical values of a map f : M N where dim M = dim N. Of course the set of critical points need not have measure zero, but we shall see that because the values of

More information

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus

MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, Elementary tensor calculus MATH 4030 Differential Geometry Lecture Notes Part 4 last revised on December 4, 205 Elementary tensor calculus We will study in this section some basic multilinear algebra and operations on tensors. Let

More information

Introduction to Banach Spaces

Introduction to Banach Spaces CHAPTER 8 Introduction to Banach Saces 1. Uniform and Absolute Convergence As a rearation we begin by reviewing some familiar roerties of Cauchy sequences and uniform limits in the setting of metric saces.

More information

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry

Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry Section 2. Basic formulas and identities in Riemannian geometry Weimin Sheng and 1. Bianchi identities The first and second Bianchi identities are R ijkl + R iklj + R iljk = 0 R ijkl,m + R ijlm,k + R ijmk,l

More information

GENERICITY OF INFINITE-ORDER ELEMENTS IN HYPERBOLIC GROUPS

GENERICITY OF INFINITE-ORDER ELEMENTS IN HYPERBOLIC GROUPS GENERICITY OF INFINITE-ORDER ELEMENTS IN HYPERBOLIC GROUPS PALLAVI DANI 1. Introduction Let Γ be a finitely generated grou and let S be a finite set of generators for Γ. This determines a word metric on

More information

δ(xy) = φ(x)δ(y) + y p δ(x). (1)

δ(xy) = φ(x)δ(y) + y p δ(x). (1) LECTURE II: δ-rings Fix a rime. In this lecture, we discuss some asects of the theory of δ-rings. This theory rovides a good language to talk about rings with a lift of Frobenius modulo. Some of the material

More information

LECTURE NOTES ON DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS

LECTURE NOTES ON DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS LECTURE NOTES ON DIFFERENTIABLE MANIFOLDS JIE WU Contents 1. Tangent Spaces, Vector Fields in R n and the Inverse Mapping Theorem 2 1.1. Tangent Space to a Level Surface 2 1.2. Tangent Space and Vectors

More information

with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map which is bilinear, satisfies the associative law for multiplication, and

with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map which is bilinear, satisfies the associative law for multiplication, and Chapter 2 Rules of calculus. 2.1 Superalgebras. A (commutative associative) superalgebra is a vector space A = A even A odd with a given direct sum decomposition into even and odd pieces, and a map A A

More information

Subgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold.

Subgroups of Lie groups. Definition 0.7. A Lie subgroup of a Lie group G is a subgroup which is also a submanifold. Recollections from finite group theory. The notion of a group acting on a set is extremely useful. Indeed, the whole of group theory arose through this route. As an example of the abstract power of this

More information

Differential Forms, Integration on Manifolds, and Stokes Theorem

Differential Forms, Integration on Manifolds, and Stokes Theorem Differential Forms, Integration on Manifolds, and Stokes Theorem Matthew D. Brown School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287 matthewdbrown@asu.edu March

More information

Survey on exterior algebra and differential forms

Survey on exterior algebra and differential forms Survey on exterior algebra and differential forms Daniel Grieser 16. Mai 2013 Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Exterior algebra for a vector space 1 1.1 Alternating forms, wedge and interior product.....................

More information

1. Tangent Vectors to R n ; Vector Fields and One Forms All the vector spaces in this note are all real vector spaces.

1. Tangent Vectors to R n ; Vector Fields and One Forms All the vector spaces in this note are all real vector spaces. 1. Tangent Vectors to R n ; Vector Fields and One Forms All the vector spaces in this note are all real vector spaces. The set of n-tuples of real numbers is denoted by R n. Suppose that a is a real number

More information

(2) For x π(p ) the fiber π 1 (x) is a closed C p subpremanifold in P, and for all ξ π 1 (x) the kernel of the surjection dπ(ξ) : T ξ (P ) T x (X) is

(2) For x π(p ) the fiber π 1 (x) is a closed C p subpremanifold in P, and for all ξ π 1 (x) the kernel of the surjection dπ(ξ) : T ξ (P ) T x (X) is Math 396. Submersions and transverse intersections Fix 1 p, and let f : X X be a C p mapping between C p premanifolds (no corners or boundary!). In a separate handout there is proved an important local

More information

Math 535a Homework 5

Math 535a Homework 5 Math 535a Homework 5 Due Monday, March 20, 2017 by 5 pm Please remember to write down your name on your assignment. 1. Let (E, π E ) and (F, π F ) be (smooth) vector bundles over a common base M. A vector

More information

Lecture 8. Connections

Lecture 8. Connections Lecture 8. Connections This lecture introduces connections, which are the machinery required to allow differentiation of vector fields. 8.1 Differentiating vector fields. The idea of differentiating vector

More information

(1) Let π Ui : U i R k U i be the natural projection. Then π π 1 (U i ) = π i τ i. In other words, we have the following commutative diagram: U i R k

(1) Let π Ui : U i R k U i be the natural projection. Then π π 1 (U i ) = π i τ i. In other words, we have the following commutative diagram: U i R k 1. Vector Bundles Convention: All manifolds here are Hausdorff and paracompact. To make our life easier, we will assume that all topological spaces are homeomorphic to CW complexes unless stated otherwise.

More information

1 )(y 0) {1}. Thus, the total count of points in (F 1 (y)) is equal to deg y0

1 )(y 0) {1}. Thus, the total count of points in (F 1 (y)) is equal to deg y0 1. Classification of 1-manifolds Theorem 1.1. Let M be a connected 1 manifold. Then M is diffeomorphic either to [0, 1], [0, 1), (0, 1), or S 1. We know that none of these four manifolds are not diffeomorphic

More information

Weil s Conjecture on Tamagawa Numbers (Lecture 1)

Weil s Conjecture on Tamagawa Numbers (Lecture 1) Weil s Conjecture on Tamagawa Numbers (Lecture ) January 30, 204 Let R be a commutative ring and let V be an R-module. A quadratic form on V is a ma q : V R satisfying the following conditions: (a) The

More information

Outline of the course

Outline of the course School of Mathematical Sciences PURE MTH 3022 Geometry of Surfaces III, Semester 2, 20 Outline of the course Contents. Review 2. Differentiation in R n. 3 2.. Functions of class C k 4 2.2. Mean Value Theorem

More information

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools

Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools Chap. 1. Some Differential Geometric Tools 1. Manifold, Diffeomorphism 1.1. The Implicit Function Theorem ϕ : U R n R n p (0 p < n), of class C k (k 1) x 0 U such that ϕ(x 0 ) = 0 rank Dϕ(x) = n p x U

More information

Mollifiers and its applications in L p (Ω) space

Mollifiers and its applications in L p (Ω) space Mollifiers and its alications in L () sace MA Shiqi Deartment of Mathematics, Hong Kong Batist University November 19, 2016 Abstract This note gives definition of mollifier and mollification. We illustrate

More information

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS

LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS LECTURE 5: COMPLEX AND KÄHLER MANIFOLDS Contents 1. Almost complex manifolds 1. Complex manifolds 5 3. Kähler manifolds 9 4. Dolbeault cohomology 11 1. Almost complex manifolds Almost complex structures.

More information

A review of the foundations of perfectoid spaces

A review of the foundations of perfectoid spaces A review of the foundations of erfectoid saces (Notes for some talks in the Fargues Fontaine curve study grou at Harvard, Oct./Nov. 2017) Matthew Morrow Abstract We give a reasonably detailed overview

More information

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström

A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity. Hans Ringström A brief introduction to Semi-Riemannian geometry and general relativity Hans Ringström May 5, 2015 2 Contents 1 Scalar product spaces 1 1.1 Scalar products...................................... 1 1.2 Orthonormal

More information

The prototypes of smooth manifolds

The prototypes of smooth manifolds The prototypes of smooth manifolds The prototype smooth manifolds are the open subsets of R n. If U is an open subset of R n, a smooth map from U to R m is an m-tuple of real valued functions (f 1, f 2,...,

More information

Math Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems:

Math Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems: Math 132 - Topology II: Smooth Manifolds. Spring 2017. Homework 2 Solution Submit solutions to the following problems: 1. Let H = {a + bi + cj + dk (a, b, c, d) R 4 }, where i 2 = j 2 = k 2 = 1, ij = k,

More information

NOTES ON FORMAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND JET BUNDLES

NOTES ON FORMAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND JET BUNDLES NOTES ON FORMAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND JET BUNDLES SHILIN U ABSTRACT. The purpose of this note is to review the construction of smooth and holomorphic jet bundles and its relation to formal neighborhood of

More information

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES

LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES LECTURE 28: VECTOR BUNDLES AND FIBER BUNDLES 1. Vector Bundles In general, smooth manifolds are very non-linear. However, there exist many smooth manifolds which admit very nice partial linear structures.

More information

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]).

BRST 2006 (jmf) 7. g X (M) X ξ X. X η = [ξ X,η]. (X θ)(η) := X θ(η) θ(x η) = ξ X θ(η) θ([ξ X,η]). BRST 2006 (jmf) 7 Lecture 2: Symplectic reduction In this lecture we discuss group actions on symplectic manifolds and symplectic reduction. We start with some generalities about group actions on manifolds.

More information

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps

Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps Hamiltonian flows, cotangent lifts, and momentum maps Jordan Bell jordan.bell@gmail.com Department of Mathematics, University of Toronto April 3, 2014 1 Symplectic manifolds Let (M, ω) and (N, η) be symplectic

More information

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY

EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY EXERCISES IN POISSON GEOMETRY The suggested problems for the exercise sessions #1 and #2 are marked with an asterisk. The material from the last section will be discussed in lecture IV, but it s possible

More information

Riemannian Geometry. Eckhard Meinrenken. Lecture Notes, University of Toronto, Spring 2002

Riemannian Geometry. Eckhard Meinrenken. Lecture Notes, University of Toronto, Spring 2002 Riemannian Geometry Eckhard Meinrenken Lecture Notes, University of Toronto, Spring 2002 Contents 1. Manifolds 4 2. Examples of manifolds 6 3. Submanifolds 7 4. Tangent spaces 9 5. Tangent map 11 6. Tangent

More information

LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP

LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP LECTURE 8: THE MOMENT MAP Contents 1. Properties of the moment map 1 2. Existence and Uniqueness of the moment map 4 3. Examples/Exercises of moment maps 7 4. Moment map in gauge theory 9 1. Properties

More information

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 5: DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY

NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 5: DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY NOTES ON DIFFERENTIAL FORMS. PART 5: DE RHAM COHOMOLOGY 1. Closed and exact forms Let X be a n-manifold (not necessarily oriented), and let α be a k-form on X. We say that α is closed if dα = 0 and say

More information

Notes on Differential Topology

Notes on Differential Topology Notes on Differential Topology George Torres Last updated January 18, 2018 Contents 1 Smooth manifolds and Topological manifolds 3 1.1 Smooth Structures............................................ 3 1.2

More information

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES. September 25, 2015 DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY CLASS NOTES INSTRUCTOR: F. MARQUES MAGGIE MILLER September 25, 2015 1. 09/16/2015 1.1. Textbooks. Textbooks relevant to this class are Riemannian Geometry by do Carmo Riemannian Geometry

More information

Derivations and differentials

Derivations and differentials Derivations and differentials Johan Commelin April 24, 2012 In the following text all rings are commutative with 1, unless otherwise specified. 1 Modules of derivations Let A be a ring, α : A B an A algebra,

More information

Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism

Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism Math 396. Bijectivity vs. isomorphism 1. Motivation Let f : X Y be a C p map between two C p -premanifolds with corners, with 1 p. Assuming f is bijective, we would like a criterion to tell us that f 1

More information

HOLONOMY GROUPOIDS OF SINGULAR FOLIATIONS

HOLONOMY GROUPOIDS OF SINGULAR FOLIATIONS j. differential geometry 58 (2001) 467-500 HOLONOMY GROUPOIDS OF SINGULAR FOLIATIONS CLAIRE DEBORD Abstract We give a new construction of Lie groupoids which is particularly well adapted to the generalization

More information

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009.

Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Practice Qualifying Exam Questions, Differentiable Manifolds, Fall, 2009. Solutions (1) Let Γ be a discrete group acting on a manifold M. (a) Define what it means for Γ to act freely. Solution: Γ acts

More information

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18

Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18 Differential Geometry MTG 6257 Spring 2018 Problem Set 4 Due-date: Wednesday, 4/25/18 Required problems (to be handed in): 2bc, 3, 5c, 5d(i). In doing any of these problems, you may assume the results

More information

Math 215B: Solutions 3

Math 215B: Solutions 3 Math 215B: Solutions 3 (1) For this problem you may assume the classification of smooth one-dimensional manifolds: Any compact smooth one-dimensional manifold is diffeomorphic to a finite disjoint union

More information

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY

ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ABSTRACT DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY VIA SHEAF THEORY ARDA H. DEMIRHAN Abstract. We examine the conditions for uniqueness of differentials in the abstract setting of differential geometry. Then we ll come up

More information

Volume-Preserving Diffeomorphisms with Periodic Shadowing

Volume-Preserving Diffeomorphisms with Periodic Shadowing Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 48, 2379-2383 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com htt://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ijma.2013.37187 Volume-Preserving Diffeomorhisms with Periodic Shadowing Manseob Lee

More information