Theory and Instrumentation of GC. GC Detectors
|
|
- Theodore Chapman
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Theory and Instrumentation of GC GC Detectors i Wherever you see this symbol, it is important to access the on-line course as there is interactive material that cannot be fully shown in this reference manual.
2 Aims and Objectives Aims To highlight the various detector types available for GC To describe the performance characteristics associated with a range of common detectors for GC To explain the working principles behind the following detectors: o Flame Ionisation o Electron Capture o Nitrogen Phosphorous o Thermal Conductivity o Flame Photometric To describe the optimisation process for each of the detector types and typical uses To illustrate the various performance characteristics of each of the detector types To highlight the use of various other detector types and give brief descriptions of them Objectives At the end of this Section you should be able to: Explain the parameters and performance measures by which GC detectors are characterised Describe the components and working principle of a number of common GC detectors Give suggestions of how each detector type might be optimised and demonstrate an understanding of each detector type in a practical context Choose the correct detector type for a variety of analyte and application types
3 Content Overview of GC Detectors 3 Concentration versus Mass Flow 3 Selective versus Universal 4 Destructive versus Nondestructive 4 Characteristics of GC Detectors 5 Noise 5 Signal to Noise Ratio 5 The Flame Ionisation Detector 6 Overview 6 Operating and Optimising 8 Uses and Performance 9 The Nitrogen Phosphorous Detector (NPD) 12 Overview 12 Operating and Optimising 13 Use and Performance 14 The Electron Capture Detector (ECD) 16 Overview 16 Operating and Optimising 17 Uses and Performance 19 The Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) 22 Overview 22 Operating and Optimising 25 Uses and Performance 26 Other GC Detectors 29 Flame Photometric Detector (FPD) 29 Photoionisation Detector (PID) 30 Electrolytic Conductivity Detector (ELCD) 31 Mass Spectrometer (MS) 32 Crawford Scientific 2
4 Overview of GC Detectors There have been over 60 detectors designed for GC applications since the inception of the technique. Probably detectors are used commonly in routine GC applications and of these only 3-4 are used in non-specific applications. All GC detectors monitor a physical property of the analyte the property chosen must significantly change, and therefore cause a large detector response, when the eluent gas flowing into the detector is contaminated by the analyte. Several properties have been used in GC detectors and these are outlined in the next table. Detectors that exhibit an enhanced response to certain analyte types are known as selective detectors. Table 1. Selected GC detectors Detector type Detector (Property) Selective Ionisation Flame Ionisation Detector (FID) No Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) No Electron Capture Detector Halogens Nitrogen Phosphorous Detector (NPD) N, P, Halogens Photoionisation Detector (PID) Aromatics Emission Flame Photometric Detector (FPD) S, P Plasma Atomic Emission (AED) Metal, Halogen, C, O Electrochemical Hall Electrolytic Conductivity (HECD) S, N, Halogen Others Chemiluminescent S Mass Spectrometer (MSD) Yes Fourier Transform Infra-red (FTIR) Yes There are three important classifications of GC detector and these are: Concentration versus Mass Flow Concentration sensitive detectors respond to the concentration of the analyte in the detector flow cell / chamber. If the flow to the detector were interrupted the signal (peak) height would not decrease, however the peak area would change. Mass Flow sensitive detectors respond to the amount of analyte in the detector at any time, irrespective of the volume of carrier gas. If the carrier flow is reduced the detector response (peak height) will decrease but the peak area will remain constant. The diagram below shows the effect of altering carrier flow on the two detector types: Crawford Scientific 3
5 Therefore, when using GC temperature programming and operating in constant pressure mode Concentration Sensitive Detectors (TCD, ECD) will have a variable peak area response as the flow rate changes, but Mass Flow sensitive detectors (FID, NPD) will show a constant peak area response as the flow rate changes. In reality, the use of constant flow with temperature programs is recommended to ensure constant peak widths. Selective versus Universal This classification describes the number of analytes that a detector will respond to. A Universal detector will theoretically respond to all solutes, whilst Selective detectors respond to specific types or classes of compound. Universal detectors are good for screening unknown mixtures and for situations where it is important to ensure all solutes are detected and quantified. Selective detectors usually show enhanced sensitivity to particular compounds and are able to simplify complex chromatograms by only detecting certain classes of compound. MS in Total Ion mode universal detector MS in Selected Ion mode responds to only compounds producing certain fragment ions. The chromatogram is simplified compared to the top example due to the specificity of the detection mode. Destructive versus Nondestructive Nondestructive detectors are required where the separated intact analyte components need to be recovered for further analysis or characterisation. This can be accomplished using destructive detectors (where the analyte is destroyed) by splitting the carrier effluent stream just prior to the detector entrance. Crawford Scientific 4
6 Characteristics of GC Detectors There are several important detector characteristics that apply to all Gas Chromatography detectors and help to describe the detector performance. The important characteristics of GC detectors include: Sensitivity (the signal output per unit concentration or mass of analyte) Minimum Detectability (usually measured by signal to noise ratio) Linearity (the range of concentrations over which reliable quantitative measurements can be made) These characteristics will be explored further using some of the terms outlined in the brief definitions above. Noise Noise is the background signal produced by the detector in the absence of analyte. It arises from electronic noise, stray environmental signals and contamination or leaks. Good design and shielding can help to reduce the inherent noise. Noise is a rapid random variation in output, whereas drift is a slow systematic change in detector output. Signal to Noise Ratio The ratio of the detector signal to the inherent background noise is a useful measure of detector performance to convey information about the lower limit of detection. Conventionally the lowest signal to noise ratio that can be attributed to an analyte would have a signal to noise (S/N) ratio of 2. From the figure opposite showing a S/N value of 2, the signal is only just perceptible from the background noise. Different regulatory authorities in various industries may specify limit of detection as a signal to noise value the actual value will vary from authority to authority but will usually be either 2 or 3. Schematic representation of the determination of detector (FID) noise using the ASTM method Crawford Scientific 5
7 Schematic representation of a peak representing a signal to noise ratio value of 2 The Flame Ionisation Detector Overview The Flame Ionisation Detector is the most widely used GC detector and was invented specifically for GC applications. It s high sensitivity and linear range for carbon-containing compounds make it very popular in organic analysis. A typical FID design is shown opposite. The column effluent is mixed with hydrogen and a make-up gas (for capillary systems) before exiting via a small orifice (jet-tip) which is surrounded by a high flow of air. The Hydrogen is combustible in air and can be lit via a remote glow plug. The stiochiometric ratio s of the air / hydrogen / carrier and make-up gas are important and will be studied further. i Crawford Scientific 6
8 As the column effluent is burned in this flame, ions are created which form a small current when a potential difference is applied. When no analyte (carbon containing compounds) are being burned, a small background current (10-20 picoamperes) arises from impurities in the carrier and detector gases. Conventionally the jet forms the anode and a cylindrical electrode held just above the flame is the cathode. A voltage of between 200 and 300V across these components is usually optimal but depends on detector design. The exact mechanism of ion production is not well characterised, however the formation of carbon ions via pyrolysis and the formation of small organic fragment ions produced via high energy combustion products are popular theories. The flame ionisation detector produces a proportional response to the number of carbon atoms in a molecule. One suggested reason for this constant response factor is the conversion of all solute carbon molecules to methane in the combustion process. When heteroatoms are present within the analyte molecule the sensitivity of the detector is much reduced. A calibration curve should be constructed for each analyte prior to quantitative analysis to take into account response variations due to detector settings. i Crawford Scientific 7
9 Operating and Optimising Since water is a product of combustion, the FID detector should be maintained at temperatures above 125 o C to prevent condensation of water and high boiling sample species. Typically most FID detectors will operate at 250 o C or above depending upon the application. Temperature does affect the sensitivity of the detector although in practice, the detector temperature is rarely a parameter that is important in optimising an analysis. If required start with a detector temperature of 250 o C and raise and lower the temperature in 20 o C steps to investigate the temperature / sensitivity relationship for particular analytes or compound groups. For efficient operation the ratio (stoichiometry) of the gases used must be correct. This is usually in the order of 1 effluent (carrier): 1 fuel (hydrogen): 10 oxidiser (air) for capillary applications this is usually in the order of ml/min. For capillary column applications where the carrier flow is less than 30ml/min. a makeup gas is used to increase the column effluent volume this serves to dilute the effluent stream (to keep within the detector linear range) and propels the analyte up into the body of the flame. The makeup gas is usually chosen to be different from the carrier nitrogen is the most popular as it s viscosity ensures good mixing with the effluent stream. The ratio of fuel to makeup + carrier is vital in determining the sensitivity of the instrument this ratio can be optimised for each analysis if required. The air flow (ratio) is not so important (as can be seen opposite) so long as a minimum flow is established. The makeup (nitrogen in this case) and hydrogen ratio have an affect on the sensitivity of the detector this is demonstrated on the plot. Each makeup flow (actually carrier + makeup) is plotted against a range of fuel (hydrogen) flow rates. As can be seen below there is a maximum value for each combination representing a possible increase of around 10% response by optimising the gas flow rates. Once past a critical minimum value the actual flow of the oxidiser seems to make little difference to the detector sensitivity. Typically this value will be between 300 and 400mL/min. The critical ratio for sustaining a flame is 8-12% hydrogen in air. Crawford Scientific 8
10 Uses and Performance The FID detector shows excellent sensitivity to carbon containing compounds the response being proportional to the number of carbon atoms in the molecule. Compounds containing halogens show a reduced response in FID detection and analytes not containing organic carbon do not burn and are therefore not detected. These include some significant compounds in organic analysis and are listed below perhaps the most significant being water. Table 2. Compounds giving little or no response in FID Detection He CS 2 NH 3 Ar COS CO Kr H 2 S CO 2 Ne SO 2 H 2 O Xe NO SiCl 4 O 2 N 2 O SiHCl 3 N 2 NO 2 SiF 4 Flame Ionisation Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD) ~ g (~50ppb) Response organic carbon containing compounds, exceptions shown above Linearity 10 7 (very wide dynamic range) Stability excellent stability, virtually no response change on flow or temperature fluctuation Temperature Limit ~ 400 o C (instrument / column dependant) Gases Combustion: Hydrogen and air, Makeup: helium or nitrogen The presence of water in samples often produces very large tailing solvent peaks and induces tailing in analyte peaks. Having a detector that effectively ignores the water is sometimes useful at simplifying the chromatogram. Other solvents (such as carbon Crawford Scientific 9
11 disulphide) are also ignored by the detector and have utility when dealing with very early eluting analytes that may otherwise elute beneath the solvent peak. The general uses of FID are too widespread to categorise fully here open any column manufacturers catalogue to find a host of relevant applications. A few typical examples have been shown cited opposite for general reference. The FID performance figures of merit are shown highlighting just why this detector is the most popular GC detector in use today. It s excellent sensitivity, linearity and wide applicability make it the foremost detector in general organic analysis. Sulphur containing compounds analysis. HP-PlotQ m 0.30mm 40μm Where: 1. Hydrogen sulphide 2. Carbonyl sulphide 3. Ethanelthiol 4. iso- propyl mercaptan 5. n- propyl mercaptan 6. n- butyl mercaptan Analysis conditions. Inlet 250 o C, split mode, 0.25cc injection Oven Temperature programmed Split flow 100mL/min Detector FID 250 o C Concentrations Mercaptans less than 10% Crawford Scientific 10
12 Blood analysis compounds on a DB-ALC1 30m 0.32mm 1.8μm Where: 1. Methanol 2. Acetaldehyde 3. Ethanol Headspace conditions. Oven: 70 o C Loop: 80 o C Transfer line: 90 o C Vial equil time: 10 o C Press time: 0.20min Analysis conditions. 4. Isopropanol 5. Acetone 6. 1-Propanol Loop fill time: Loop equil time: Inject time: Sample loop size: Samp comp: 0.20min 0.05min min 1.0mL 0.1% ethanol Carrier Oven Injector Detector Helium at 69 cm/sec, measured at 40 o C 40 o C Isothermal Headspace to split inlet, split 1:10, 250 o C injection FID 300 o C, nitrogen makeup gas at 23mL/min Crawford Scientific 11
13 The Nitrogen Phosphorous Detector (NPD) Overview Although the nitrogen phosphorous detector (NPD) is based on a similar design to the FID, and whilst belonging to the family of ionising detectors it works on a different principle to the FID. First introduced in 1964 by Karmen and Giuffrida this detector is also known as the Thermionic detector and is popular because of it s enhanced sensitivity and selectivity towards compounds containing nitrogen and/or phosphorous, as its name suggests. Whilst the main structure of the detector looks essentially similar to the FID, the main difference is the addition of a resistively heated bead just above or in the vicinity of the jet. The bead contains or is coated with an alkali metal salt usually caesium or rubidium silicate. When heated this bead emits thermionic electrons which migrate to the collector electrode and form the background current. The hydrogen flow into the detector is appreciably less than used in the FID and is too low to sustain a flame at the jet tip. Rather a plasma of fuel (hydrogen), oxidiser (air), carrier effluent and makeup passes over the bead at which point partial combustion occurs due to the heating filament. When a suitable analyte is eluted into the plasma, the partially combusted nitrogen or phosphorous materials are adsorbed onto the surface of the bead. This reduces the work function of the bead surface effectively making it easier to emit electrons at the applied voltage / temperature. Thus the emitted electron density increases, which causes an increase in the current in the detector which is amplified and becomes the chromatographic peak. i Crawford Scientific 12
14 Operating and Optimising Typically NPD detectors are run at slightly higher temperatures than FID detectors 260 to 350 o C being typical. The temperature of the detector does not have a radical effect on response but higher temperatures do extend bead lifetime. The voltage applied to the bead (and hence the resulting temperature) does have a marked effect on the detector response. If unsure start at 2V and make 10mV adjustments until the optimum response is obtained. It is essential to ensure that the hydrogen flow rate is low enough NOT to sustain a flame at the jet tip otherwise measurement of nitrogen containing compounds will not be possible. The detector is sensitive to variations in the hydrogen flow rate and a constant flow of hydrogen is recommended to ensure steady baselines. The main disadvantage of this detector is that its performance deteriorates with time usually seen via the need to increase the bead voltage in order to generate a signal. The water formed from combustion of hydrogen hydrolyses the alkali silicate to the metal hydroxide and silica. As the alkali metal hydroxide is volatile under typical operating conditions, the rubidium or caesium is constantly lost from the bead ultimately leaving an inert bead of silica. To conserve bead life it is possible to turn off the detector (conventionally by interrupting the hydrogen flow) whilst solvent peaks elute or between injections when the GC oven is cooling. As the detector is flow sensitive it is recommended that constant flow mode is used during temperature programming. i Crawford Scientific 13
15 Extending the life of the bead Use the lowest practical adjust offset or bead voltage. Run clean samples. Turn the bead off when not in use. Keep the detector temperature high (320 to 335 C). Turn the hydrogen flow off during solvent peaks and between runs. If your NPD is Off for a long time in a high-humidity environment, water may accumulate in your detector. To evaporate this water: o Set the detector temperature at 100 C and maintain it for 30 minutes o Set the detector temperature to 150 C and maintain it for another 30 minutes Use and Performance The NPD detector is a factor of around 500 times more sensitive to nitrogen and phosphorous containing compounds than to carbon containing compounds in general this makes the detector effectively selective towards nitogenated and phosphorylated compounds. The NPD has a very high sensitivity, i.e., about an order of magnitude less than that of the electron capture detector (ca g/ml for phosphorus and g/ml for nitrogen). The high selectivity of the detector leads to it s high sensitivity and the ability of the detector to simplify chromatograms by effectively ignoring other compound classes. The specific response of the NPD to nitrogen and phosphorus, coupled with its relatively high sensitivity, makes it especially useful for the analysis of many pharmaceuticals and in environmental samples containing herbicides. Employing appropriate column system traces of herbicides at the 500 pg level can easily be determined. Nitrogen Phosphorous Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD) ~ 10-11g (~10pg) Response selective to nitrogen and phosphorous containing compounds Linearity 10 6 (very wide dynamic range) Stability excellent stability, hydrogen flow and bead temperature should be carefully controlled Temperature Limit ~ 400 o C (instrument / column dependant) Gases Combustion: Hydrogen and air, Makeup: helium or nitrogen Nitrogen/Phosphorous containing Pesticides (carrier gas 30cm/sec He), EPA method 507 Crawford Scientific 14
16 Where: 1. Prometon 2. Atrazine 3. Prometryne 4. Ametryne Oven and detector parameters. Oven Initial temp: 80 o C 1 st ramp: 30 o C/min to 178 o C 2 nd ramp: 2 o C/min to 205 o C 3 rd ramp: 30 o C/min to 310 o C Final temp: 310 o C for 4min Detector Temperature: Makeup gas: Hydrogen: 290 o C He, 30mL/min 4mL/min Injection and pressure programming. Injection parameters Pressure programming Temp: Vol injected: Pneumatics: Purge delay: 250 o C 1μL Splitless mode 1min Initial head pressure: 13.6 psi 1 st ramp: 0.5psi/min to 21psi 2 nd ramp: 1psi/min to 31psi Void time: 1.63 min Determination of carbaryl Conditions. Injection parameters Oven: 70 o C (1min) to 230 o C (5min) at 20 o C/min Column: HP-5, mm 0.25mmμL Makeup gas: N 2, 15mL/min Pressure programming Column flow: 2mL/min Detector temp: 330 o C Detector: 3mL/min of H 2, air at 60mL/min Inlet: SL mode, 60mL/min purge 0.75min Inlet temp: 250 o C Crawford Scientific 15
17 Determination of triazines in pond water extract Where: 1. Propazine 2. Atrazine 3. Simazine 4. Terbuthylazine 5. Prometryne 6. Ametryne 7. Simetryne 8. Terbutryne Conditions. Oven Initial temp: 170 o C for 1min 1 st ramp: to 195 o C at 2 o C/min 2 nd ramp: to 230 o C at 2 o C/min Final temp: 230 o C for 3min Detector: NPD 250 o C Makeup gas: He at 28mL/min Injector: Split 1:10, 250 o C Column: DB-35 30m 0.25mm 0.25μm The Electron Capture Detector (ECD) Overview The invention of the Electron Capture Detector is attributed in Lovelock in The detector measures the electrical conductivity of the effluent gas stream resulting from exposure to ionising radiation from a radionulclide. It is a selective detector that responds to compounds capable of capturing electrons more especially, halogenated compounds. The radionuclide is 63Nickel which emits beta particles (low energy electrons). 63 Ni These negatively charged particles collide with carrier gas molecules and produce further, higher energy, electrons (remember that beta particles are themselves low energy electrons). Crawford Scientific 16
18 N2 2e N2 The electrons formed by this process establish a high standing current between the anode (usually the inlet tube or detector body) and the cathode (usually a cylindrical electrode in the centre or top of the detector). The potential difference applied is usually V dc). When an electronegative analyte elutes, the analyte molecules capture some of the background electrons and this results in a reduction of the standing (background) current. A e A The negative analyte ions formed are slow moving and are not collected by the anode. The extent of electron absorption, and hence the reduction in standing current, is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. i Operating and Optimising The carrier gases used for ECD operation should be pure and dry. Oxygen and water are both electronegative and as such contribute to a noisy baseline if they are present in the carrier or makeup gases even in trace amounts. When the detector is used with capillary columns, a makeup gas is generally required in this case it is convenient to use less expensive (but high quality) nitrogen as the makeup gas and the more expensive helium as the carrier. It is recommended that ultrapure gases are used at all times when operating an ECD detector. Crawford Scientific 17
19 63 Ni sources are preferred to 3 H (tritium) sources as they can be operated at higher temperatures (up to 400 o C vs 220 o C), and are inherently less radioactive, however they produce a less linear response. Improved performance and linearity can be obtained by operating the detector in a pulsed mode. A square wave pulse (amplitude 50V, width 1 m s at intervals of μs) is applied at a frequency that maintains a constant current in the detector cell in order to maintain the current in the presence of an analyte the pulse frequency has to be increased. The signal is generated in proportion to the frequency of the applied pulse. The cleanliness of the detector needs to be maintained at all times, which often means care with sample preparation. Chromatographic peaks obtained from a dirty ECD detector have a distinctive shape and the sensitivity of the detector can often increase as detector performance deteriorates. i Crawford Scientific 18
20 As the ECD is a non-destructive detector, contamination builds up on the inner surfaces of the detector. As a result the magnitude of the standing current decreases although the decrease in the current per analyte molecule remains the same. Unusually this may lead to an increase in the instrument sensitivity as the detector becomes dirtier. This behaviour is less likely when the detector is operated in the pulsed mode. Typically, when the detector performance in deteriorating a marked deviation away from the expected linear range is seen especially at higher analyte concentrations as shown. Further, a typical chromatographic symptom od detector performance loss is the formation of a negative dip either before or after each peak. Uses and Performance One drawback of the ECD is the necessity to use a radioactive source, which may require a license or at least regular radiological testing. The sensitivity of the electron capture detector is variable, depending upon the electron affinity of the analyte. For compounds of high electron affinity, such as halogenated compounds, minimum detectability of picograms on column are not untypical with the added benefit that chromatograms are much simplified due to the very high selectivity. The linearity of the detector is limited, although as discussed the use of the detector in pulsed mode does extend the minimum detectability, and hence the dynamic range. Ranges of X50 are typical for 63 Ni sources. It is vital that any analysis is carried out against a multi-point calibration curve that covers the anticipated range of sample concentrations. The detector is perhaps, one of the more tricky to operate in practice. It will also require periodic cleaning. Given that it contains a radioactive source this may need to be carried out by the equipment manufacturer. Electron Capture Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD): ~ g Response: highly selective towards analytes with electronegative atoms (especially halogens) Linearity: (limited dynamic range- better in pulsed mode) Stability: fair but susceptible to impurities in gases used and leaks in the detector body Temperature Limi:t ~ 400 o C ( 63 Ni) / 220 o C ( 3 H) Gases Carrier: Helium, Makeup: nitrogen or 5% methane in argon (all gases must be ultra high purity) Crawford Scientific 19
21 Organochloride pesticides Where: 1. Trifluralin 2. Chloroneb 3. Propachlor 4. HCB 5. α-bhc 6. r-bhc 7. β-bhc 8. Chlorothalonil 9. Heptachlor 10. δ-bhc 11. Alachlor 12. Aldrin 13. DCPA 14. Heptachlor epoxide 15. r-chlordane 16. o,p -DDE 17. α-chlordane 18. Endosulfan I 19. p,p -DDE 20. Dieldrin 21. o,p -DDD 22. Chlorobenzilate 23. Endrin 24. o,p -DDT 25. p,p -DDD 26. Endosulfan II 27. p,p -DDT 28. Endrin aldehyde 29. Endosulfan sulphate 30. Dibuthyl chlorendate 31. Methoxychlor 32. HBB Conditions. Oven Initial temp: 140 o C for 2min 1 st ramp: to 240 o C at 10 o C/min Dwell: 240 o C for 5 min 2 nd ramp: to 265 o C at 5 o C/min Final temp: 265 o C for 10min Detector: ECD 325 o C Makeup gas: N 2 at 30mL/min Carrier: He at 35cm/sec measured, 250 o C Column: DB-5 30m 0.53mm 1.5μm Crawford Scientific 20
22 Haloacetic acid methyl esters (optimized for resolution) Where: 1. Chloroacetic acid 2. Bromoacetic acid 3. Dichloroacetic acid 4. Dalapon 5. Trichloroacetic acid 6. Bromochloroacetic acid 7. 1,2,3,-Trichloropropane (ISTD) 8. Dibromoacetic acid 9. Bromodichloroacetic acid 10. Chlorodibromodichloroacetic acid 11. 2,3,-Dibromopropionic acid (SSTD) 12. Tribromoacetic acid Conditions. Oven Initial temp: 35 o C for 10min 1 st ramp: to 75 o C at 5 o C/min Dwell: 75 o C for 15 min 2 nd ramp: to 100 o C at 5 o C/min Dwell: 100 o C for 5 min 3 rd ramp: to 135 o C at 5 o C/min Final temp: 135 o C for 5min Detector: ECD 260 o C Makeup gas: N 2 at 30mL/min Injector: Splitless, 200 o C, 30sec purge Column: DB m 0.25mm 0.25μm Crawford Scientific 21
23 Purgeable halocarbons (EPA method 502.1) Where: 1. Fluorotrichloromethane 2. Methylene chloride 3. trans-1,2-dichloroethylene 4. 1,1-Dichloroethylene 5. 2,2- Dichloroethane, cis-1,2 Dichloroethylene 6. Bromochloromethane 7. Chloroform 8. 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 9. Carbon tetrachloride 10. 1,2-Dichloroethylene 11. 1,2-Dichloropropane 12. Bromodichloromethane 13. 1,1,2-Trichloroethane, 1,3- dichloropropane, tetrachloroethylene 14. Dibromochloromethane 15. 1,2-Dibromoethane (ECB) 16. 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 17. Bromoform 18.1,2,3-Trichloropropane, 1,1,2,2- tetrachloroethane 19. Pentachloroethane 20. bis-(2-chloroisopropyl) ether 21. 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane Conditions. Oven Initial temp: 35 o C for 5min Ramp: to 135 o C at 4 o C/min Detector: ECD 300 o C Makeup gas: N 2 at 40mL/min Injector: Purge and trap (desorption 8mL/min) Column: DB m 0.53mm 3.0μm The Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) Overview The Thermal Conductivity Detector (TCD) was used on most early GC instruments and was developed from a traditional gas analyser. It s simplicity, robustness and ability to monitor almost any analyte make it still popular today especially for the analysis of inorganic compounds and permanent gases. The detector is a heated metal (usually stainless steel) block drilled with two passageways or cavities. Each cavity contains a filament made from a high temperature coefficient of resistance metal such as Rhenium or Tungsten. These two filaments are heated and connected to the arms of a Wheatstone Bridge as shown opposite. Pure carrier (or reference gas) is allowed to flow over one filament (the reference cell) whilst the column effluent flows over the other (the analysis cell). Crawford Scientific 22
24 i When an analyte elutes into the analytical cell the thermal conductivity of the gas changes which causes a change in the rate of heat loss from the analytical filament. The Wheatstone Bridge becomes unbalanced and current needs to be supplied in order to restore the balance. Whilst the gas flowing over the two filaments is equal the thermal conductivity will be equal and the filaments will have the same rate of heat loss the Wheatsone bridge will be balanced and the signal will be zero. If an analyte elutes with the carrier, the thermal conductivity of the gas in the analysis cell changes, the rates of heat loss of the two filaments will not be balanced and a current will have to be applied to balance the Wheatstone bridge. It is this current which is recorded as the signal. The size of the applied current will be related to the concentration of analyte in the effluent gas. The size of the cell is critical in determining the sensitivity of the detector with 140 μl being typical in a detector used for packed column GC. These devices cannot be used with narrow bore capillary columns and the cell volume must be drastically reduced. Several manufacturers offer single cell devices of very low volume (~5μL) for use with capillary columns in which the reference and analysis streams are switched onto the single filament in the order of 5-10Hz. Ultra-small detector devices etched onto silica wafers are also available but are not used routinely. Crawford Scientific 23
25 i Thermal conductivity detector. In order to reduce volume single cell TCD s are used with capillary columns this design has a cell volume of around 5μL. The switching occurs around to times/second Crawford Scientific 24
26 Operating and Optimising It is important that the filaments are held at a temperature ABOVE that of the body of the detector so that the effects of filament temperature change are optimised. The larger the heating current applied to the filament, the greater the temperature differential and the greater the detector sensitivity. However, high filament temperatures also mean shorter filament life and the potential that the filament will burn out if no gas is flowing in the cell. The detector is susceptible to changes in the detector body, the filament temperature (and hence the current supplied), and the nature and flow of the carrier gas. Therefore, all of these parameters should be kept as stable as possible. This usually means covering the detector with a thermal cladding and ensuring that constant flow mode is used during temperature programming analysis. These factors inhibit the inherent stability of the detector. The sensitivity of the detector very much depends upon the difference in thermal conductivity between the eluting analyte and the carrier / reference gas. Interestingly this precludes the use of Area Normalisation as a method of quantitation! Hydrogen and helium have a much larger thermal conductivity value than most common analytes and as such they are preferred as the carrier. The use of nitrogen or argon as the carrier severely impairs the sensitivity of the detector. Table 3. Thermal Conductivities and TCD Response Values for Selected Compounds. Item Compound Thermal Conductivity Relative Molar Response Carrier gases Argon 12.5 Carbon Dioxide 12.7 Helium 100 Hydrogen 128 Nitrogen 18 Samples Ethane n-butane n-nonane i-butane Cyclohexane Benzene Acetone Ethanol Chloroform Methyl iodide Ethyl Acetate Thermal Conductivity values relative to Helium Relative Molar Response in Helium: Standard Benzene = 100 Crawford Scientific 25
27 Uses and Performance The thermal conductivity detector is capable of detecting almost any species, as long as their thermal conductivity is differentiated from that of the carrier gas used, therefore it s universality is excellent. By default, the selectivity of the detector is poor, however it is possible to use an interfering species as the carrier to increase selectivity. An example is the analysis of oxygen in argon, which are virtually impossible to separate chromatographically. However by using argon as the carrier, the argon peak is eliminated and the oxygen peak can be clearly seen in the chromatogram. Sensitivity of the detector again depends upon the equipment set-up and the differential in thermal conductivity between the analyte and the carrier gas. It is one of the few detectors that can be used to detect the inorganic gases (such as H 2 O, CO, CO 2, H 2 etc.) and therefore it is the detector of choice for permanent gases. As the detector is non-destructive, it is often used in series with other detectors to detect gaseous or highly volatile sample components. The use of the TCD alongside an FID for the analysis of Transformer Oil Headspace gas is highlighted opposite. The linearity of the detector is widest when the differential between the carrier and analyte thermal conductivity is widest. The dynamic range can be extended by using micro or nano cell devices or by employing low volume single cell instruments with stream switching as described previously. Detector stability is reasonable but precautions should be taken to avoid temperature drift or fluctuation and a consistent flow of carrier should be established prior to analysis. Thermal Conductivity Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD): ~ 10-9 g (~10ppm) Response: all compounds Linearity: 10 4 (limited range) Stability: moderate Temperature Limit: ~ 400 o C Gases Carrier: (usually) Helium / Makeup: Same as carrier Crawford Scientific 26
28 Fuel cell gas extract analysis Where: Conditions. Carrier gas: Helium Inlet: Purged packed 55 o C Sample loop: 0.1mL TCD: 180 o C Oven Initial temp: 50 o C for 10min Ramp: to 120 o C at 10 o C/min Permanent gas analysis (GS-Molsieve, 30m 0.53mm I.D.) Where: 1. Neon 2. Oxygen 3. Nitrogen 4. Methane 5. Carbon monoxide Conditions. Carrier gas: Helium at 35 cm/sec (4.6mL/min) Oven: 50 o C isothermal Injector: Detector: Makeup: Split 1:10, 250μL, 100 o C TCD 125 o C He at 10mL/min Crawford Scientific 27
29 Inorganic gases (GS-GasPro, 30m 0.32mm I.D.) Where: 1. Nitrogen 2. CO 2 3. SF 6 4. COS 5. H 2 S 6. Ethylene oxide 7. SO 2 Conditions. Carrier gas: Helium at 53 cm/sec Oven: 25 o C for 3 min o C (10 o C/min) -200 o C hold Injector: Split 1:50, 50μL, 200 o C Detector: TCD 250 o C Crawford Scientific 28
30 C1-C10 Hydrocarbons (GS-Q, 30m 0.53mm I.D.) Where: 1. Methane 2. Ethylene 3. Ethane 4. Propylene 5. Propane 6. Isobutane 7. 1-Butene 8. n-butane 9. cis-2-butene 10. trans-2-butene 11. Isopentane 12. n-pentane 13. n-hexane 14. n-heptane 15. n-octane 16. n-nonane 17. n-decane Conditions. Carrier gas: Oven: Helium at 8 ml/min 70 o C for 3 min o C (20 o C/min) 180 o C hold for 3 min o C (5 o C/min) 230 o C hold for 10 min Injector: Detector: Split 1:50, 250 o C TCD 300 o C Other GC Detectors Flame Photometric Detector (FPD) Compounds are burned in a hydrogen-air flame very similar to an FID detector. Sulphur and phosphorous containing compounds produce light emitting species (sulphur 394nm / phosphorous 526nm). A monochromatic filter allows only one of the wavelengths to pass and a photomultiplier tube is used to measure the amount of incident light and a signal is generated. A different filter is required for each detection mode. Crawford Scientific 29
31 i Flame photometric detector Flame Photometric Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD): ~ pg (sulphur); 1-10pg (phosphorous) Response: Sulphur or phosphorous containing compounds (one at a time) Linearity: The response in the phosphorus mode is linear over four orders of magnitude. The sulphur response, varies such that the square root of the response is proportional to the concentration and is linear on a log log scale over three orders of magnitude. Stability: moderate Temperature Limit: ~ 300 o C Combustion gases: Hydrogen and Air. Makeup: Nitrogen Photoionisation Detector (PID) Compounds eluting into a cell are bombarded with high-energy photons emitted from a lamp. Compounds with ionisation potentials below the photon energy are ionised. The resulting ions are attracted to an electrode, measured and a signal is generated. i Photoionisation Detector Crawford Scientific 30
32 Photoionisation Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD) ~ 25-50pg (aromatics); pg (olefins) Response: Depends on lamp characteristics, conventionally used for aromatics and olefins (10 ev lamp) The response is linear over six or seven orders of magnitude. Stability: good Temperature Limit: ~ 200 o C Makeup gas: Same as carrier Electrolytic Conductivity Detector (ELCD) Compounds are mixed with a reaction gas and passed through a high temperature reaction tube. Specific reaction products are created which mix with a solvent and pas through an electrolytic conductivity cell. The change in the electrolytic conductivity of the solvent is measured and a signal generated. Reaction tube temperature and solvent determine the type of reactant detected. Electrolytic Conductivity Detector Electrochemical Conductivity Detector Characteristics Minimum Detectability (LOD): ~ 5-10pg (halogens); 10-20pg (sulphur); 10-20pg (nitrogen) Response: Halogens, sulphur or nitrogen containing compounds (one at a time) Linearity: Sulphur ; Nitrogen ; Halogens Stability: good Temperature Limit: ~ o C (halogens); o C (nitrogen); o C (sulphur) Gases: Hydrogen (halogens and nitrogen); air (sulphur) Crawford Scientific 31
33 Mass Spectrometer (MS) The detector is maintained under vacuum. Compounds eluting from the GC column are bombarded with electrons (EI) or reagent gas ions (CI) in order to ionise them. Compounds fragment into characteristic charged ions or fragments and the resulting charged species are focussed and accelerated into a mass analysing device typically a Quadrupole mass analyser or Ion Trap mass analyser. The mass analyser selectively allows ions of a selected mass to charge ratio to pass through the analyser to the electron multiplier where a signal due to that specific mass to charge ration ion is generated. The mass filter can be adjusted to allow specified ions to pass (selected ion monitoring mode) or to quickly scan over a range of mass to charge values (scanning mode). The abundance (total ion count) versus time is plotted to form the chromatogram. A mass spectrum can be obtained for each scan which plots the number of ions at each different mass to charge ratio in the range selected. i Mass Spectrometer Characteristics Mass Spectrometer Minimum Detectability (LOD): ~ 1-10ng (SCAN); 1-10pg (SIM) Response: Any compound that produces fragments (or ions) within the selected mass range of the analysing device. May be an inclusive range of mass to charge ratios (SCAN mode) or selected ions (Selected Ion Mode (SIM)) Linearity: (good dynamic range) Stability: good Temperature Limit: ~ 250 o C Carrier gas: Helium Crawford Scientific 32
34
2401 Gas (liquid) Chromatography
2401 Gas (liquid) Chromatography Chromatography Scheme Gas chromatography - specifically gas-liquid chromatography - involves a sample being vaporized and injected onto the head of the chromatographic
More informationGas chromatography. Advantages of GC. Disadvantages of GC
Advantages of GC Gas chromatography Fast analysis, typically minutes Effi cient, providing high resolution Sensitive, easily detecting ppm and often ppb Nondestructive, making possible on - line coupling;
More informationIntroduction to Gas Chromatography
Introduction to Gas Chromatography 31-1 Objectives To know what is chromatography To understand the mechanism of compound separation To know the basic of gas chromatography system 31-2 Chromatography Definition
More informationHarris: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Eight Edition CHAPTER 23: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY
Harris: Quantitative Chemical Analysis, Eight Edition CHAPTER 23: GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY Chapter 23. Gas Chromatography What did they eat in the year 1,000? GC of Cholesterol and other lipids extracted from
More informationRtx -CLPesticides Columns Reduce Analysis Time; Reduce System Maintenance
Columns Reduce Analysis Time; Reduce System Maintenance 0 YEARS Turning Visions into Reality www.restek.com 00-- --00 and Fused Silica Columns Detect and confirm 0 common organochlorine pesticides simultaneously.
More information10/27/10. Chapter 27. Injector typically 50 C hotter than oven
Sample and solvent are vaporized onto the head of a column Vaporized solvent and solute are carried through the column by an inert gas (mobile phase) The mobile phase does not interact with compounds of
More informationGAS CHROMATOGRAPHY. Mobile phase is a gas! Stationary phase could be anything but a gas
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY Mobile phase is a gas! Stationary phase could be anything but a gas Gas Chromatography (GC) GC is currently one of the most popular methods for separating and analyzing compounds. This
More informationTHE NEW QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ULTRATRACE SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL GAS
International Gas Union Research Conference 14 THE NEW QUANTITATIVE ANALYTICAL METHOD FOR ULTRATRACE SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN NATURAL GAS Main author Hironori IMANISHI Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd. JAPAN himanishi@tokyo-.co.jp
More informationChromatographic Methods of Analysis Section: 5 Gas Chromatography (GC) Prof. Tarek A. Fayed
Chromatographic Methods of Analysis Section: 5 Gas Chromatography (GC) Prof. Tarek A. Fayed Gas Chromatography (GC) In gas chromatography, the sample is vaporized and injected onto the head of a chromatographic
More informationGas Chromatography CHEM Dr. Reem M. Alghanmi st term
Gas Chromatography CHEM 313-5 Dr. Reem M. Alghanmi 2017 1 st term 17.7 Gas Chromatography Introduction There are two types of gas chromatography: Gas-solid (adsorption) chromatography. Gas-liquid (partition)
More informationChapter 31 Gas Chromatography. Carrier Gas System
Chapter 31 Gas Chromatography GAS-LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY In gas chromatography, the components of a vaporized sample are fractionated as a consequence of being partitioned between a mobile gaseous phase
More informationGas Chromatography (GC)! Environmental Organic Chemistry CEE-PUBH Analysis Topic 5
Gas Chromatography (GC)! Environmental Organic Chemistry CEE-PUBH 5730-6730 Analysis Topic 5 Chromatography! Group of separation techniques based on partitioning (mobile phase/stationary phase). Two immiscible
More informationGas Chromatography. Rosa Yu, David Reckhow CEE772 Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis CEE 772 #16 2
Print version Gas Chromatography Rosa Yu, David Reckhow CEE772 Instrumental Methods in Environmental Analysis CEE 772 #16 1 Contents The primary components to a GC system 1. Carrier Gas System (including
More informationDetection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS
Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in polluted air by an Agilent mini Thermal Desorber and an Agilent 5975T LTM GC/MS Application Note Environmental Author Xiaohua Li Agilent Technologies (Shanghai)
More informationEvaluating CLP and EPA Methods for Pesticides in Water Using Agilent J&W DB-CLP1/DB-CLP2 GC Columns
Evaluating CLP and EPA Methods for Pesticides in Water Using Agilent J&W DB-CLP/DB-CLP GC Columns Application Note Environmental Authors Doris Smith and Ken Lynam Agilent Technologies, Inc. Abstract The
More informationValidation of USEPA Method Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS
Validation of USEPA Method 524.2 Using a Stratum PTC, AQUATek 100 Autosampler, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Application Note By: Nathan Valentine Abstract The US EPA developed Method 524.2¹, Measurement
More informationFar UV Absorbance Detector
Far UV Absorbance Detector Theory Most organic and inorganic species absorb strongly in the far UV. Notable exceptions are the inert gases, helium and nitrogen which absorb very weakly in this region.
More informationGC Instruments. GC Instruments - Sample Introduction
GC Instruments 1 Fairly simple instrumentation Maintaining constant average pressure is important! Pressure controls flow rate T influences retention (k ) Flow rate monitoring Changing flow rate changes
More informationProduct Brief. - Hydrocarbons alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, dienes including natural gas, refinery gas, liquified petroleum gas
Agilent Porous Polymer PLOT Columns: New Products, Expanded Uses, Prices Cut in Half! Product Brief Need improved resolution of small volatile compounds? Didn't try a PLOT column due to high price, short
More informationUsing Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260
Using Hydrogen as An Alternative Carrier Gas for US EPA 8260 Application Note Abstract Due to regional shortages and increasing costs of helium, the preferred carrier gas in gas chromatography, alternative
More informationHeadspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications
Headspace Technology for GC and GC/MS: Features, benefits & applications Karima Baudin Oct 2015 Why use Headspace? Very Simple no to minimum sample prep Robust enhance uptime Non-detectable carry-over
More informationGas chromatography. Flow measurement. Flow control. Injection methods. Flow measurement
Gas chromatography Schematic of a packed column gas chromatograph First instrumental chromatographic method developed commercially. Reason - it is relatively easy to produce a stable flow and pressure
More informationContinuous Improvement in Petroleum/Petrochemical Analysis HP s Family of Innovative PLOT Columns
Continuous Improvement in Petroleum/Petrochemical Analysis HP s Family of Innovative PLOT Columns Brochure Brief Porous Layer Open Tubular (PLOT) columns have been replacing traditional packed columns
More informationChapter 27: Gas Chromatography
Chapter 27: Gas Chromatography Gas Chromatography Mobile phase (carrier gas): gas (He, N 2, H 2 ) - do not interact with analytes - only transport the analyte through the column Analyte: volatile liquid
More informationVirtually Particle-Free Rt -Silica BOND Columns
Petrochemical Applications Virtually Particle-Free Rt -Silica BOND s Provide Reliable PLOT Performance With Less Time Lost for Maintenance By Amanda Rigdon, Bill Bromps, Tom Vezza, and Jaap de Zeeuw Optimized
More informationStudy of Residual Solvents in Various Matrices by Static Headspace
Application Note Abstract United States Pharmacopeia (USP) chapter is a widely used method for identifying and quantifying Organic Volatile Impurities (OVI) used in the production of pharmaceuticals.
More informationThe Analysis of Trace Contaminants in High Purity Ethylene and Propylene Using GC/MS. Application. Agilent Technologies/Wasson ECE Monomer Analyzer
The Analysis of Trace Contaminants in High Purity Ethylene and Propylene Using GC/MS Agilent Technologies/Wasson ECE Monomer Analyzer Application Authors Fred Feyerherm 119 Forest Cove Dr. Kingwood, TX
More informationUnderstanding Gas Chromatography
Understanding Gas Chromatography What is Really Going on Inside the Box? Simon Jones GC Applications Engineer Page 1 Group/Presentation Title Month ##, 200X ?? K? Page 2 Typical GC System Gas supply Injector
More informationHelium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C
APPLICATION NOTE 10441 Helium conservation in volatile organic compound analysis using U.S. EPA Method 8260C Authors Andrea Caruso, 1 Tommaso Albertini, 1 Jacob A. Rebholz 2 ; 1 Thermo Fisher Scientific,
More informationRoger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1
Application Note US EPA Method 524.4 with the Tekmar Lumin P & T Concentrator and Thermo Scientific TRACE 1310 GC and ISQ LT MS System Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar P a g e 1 Abstract
More informationAnalysis of USP Method <467> Residual Solvents on the Agilent 8890 GC System
Application Note Residual Solvent Analysis of USP Method Residual Solvents on the Agilent 889 GC System Author Lukas Wieder, Jie Pan, and Rebecca Veeneman Agilent Technologies, Inc. 8 Centerville Road
More informationUS EPA Method with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS
APPLICATION NOTE: TECHNOLOGY: INDUSTRY: AN1806 P+T VOC ENV US EPA Method 524.2 with the Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator, AQUATek LVA and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS Amy Nutter, Applications Chemist; Teledyne
More informationDET REPORT. 1.) CATALYTIC COMBUSTION IONIZATION DETECTION (CCID) - MORE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SELECTIVITY FOR n PARAFFINS. NO.
1.) CATALYTIC COMBUSTION IONIZATION DETECTION (CCID) - MORE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SELECTIVITY FOR n-paraffins. 2.) FINGERPRINT CHROMATOGRAMS OF GASOLINES BY SELECTIVELY DETECTING ALKANE AND OXYGENATE
More informationAnalysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the 4100 Autosampler
Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Using USEPA Method 8260 and the 4760 Purge and Trap and the Introduction Although analysis of VOCs by purge and trap is considered a mature technique, advances in
More informationImproved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source
Improved Volatiles Analysis Using Static Headspace, the Agilent 5977B GC/MSD, and a High-efficiency Source Application Note Environmental Authors Peter Gautschi and Harry Prest Senior Application Scientist
More informationCh24. Gas Chromatography (GC)
Ch24. Gas Chromatography (GC) 24.1 What did they eat in the year 1000? From 13 C content of cholesterol in ancient bone 13 C : 1.1%, 12 C: 98.9% 13 C/ 12 C ratio types of plants Bones of 50 people in Barton-on-Humber
More informationElectronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical Model of Analyte Uptake by Permeation Passive Samplers
Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts. This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 Electronic Supplementary Material Experimentally Validated Mathematical
More informationRelative Sensitivity RS Measurements of Gases
Gas Analysis Relative Sensitivity RS Measurements of Gases Introduction This note describes the main factors that influence the relative sensitivity factor (RSF) of a mass spectrometer and describes how
More informationRoger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1
Application Note US EPA Method 524.2 with the Teledyne Tekmar Lumin P&T Concentrator and Agilent 7890B GC / 5977A MS Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1 Abstract US EPA Method
More informationSkoog/Holler/Crouch Chapter 26 Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 6th ed. CHAPTER 26
Skoog/Holler/Crouch Chapter 26 Principles of Instrumental Analysis, 6th ed. Instructor s Manual CHAPTE 26 26-1. (a) Elution is a process in which species are washed through a chromatographic column by
More informationQuantification of Pesticides in Food without Calibration using GC/FID with the Polyarc Reactor
Quantification of Pesticides in Food without Calibration using GC/FID with the Polyarc Reactor Application Note Pesticides Authors Charlie Spanjers and Paul Dauenhauer University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
More informationBiochemistry. Biochemical Techniques. 12 Gas Liquid Chromatography
Description of Module Subject Name Paper Name 12 Module Name/Title 12 Gas - liquid Chromatography 1. Objectives 1.1 To understand principle of Gas Liquid Chromatography 1.2 To explain the different components
More informationAnalysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Benzene Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application
Analysis of Trace (mg/kg) Thiophene in Using Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography and Flame Ionization Detection Application Petrochemical Authors James D. McCurry and Bruce D. Quimby Agilent Technologies
More informationValidation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS
Validation of USEPA Method 8260C Using Teledyne Tekmar Atomx, and Perkin-Elmer Clarus 600 GC/MS Application Note By Tyler Trent Abstract In order to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds
More informationGas Chromatography. Chromatography Laboratory Course. Dr. Christian Jungnickel Chromatography Course GC September 2005
Gas Chromatography Chromatography Laboratory Course The laboratory course experiments General Aim: Gain general experience using a GC Constant Injection technique Temperature variations Qualitative and
More informationThermal Desorption Technical Support
Thermal Desorption Technical Support Note 86a: US EPA Method TO-17 for Monitoring Air Toxics in Ambient Air Using Sorbent Tubes and Automated, Cryogen-free Thermal Desorption Application Note Environmental,
More informationAUTOMATED ONLINE IDENTIFICATION AND MONITORING OF IMPURITIES IN GASES
JPACSM 127 AUTOMATED ONLINE IDENTIFICATION AND MONITORING OF IMPURITIES IN GASES Trace Analytical Inc. Menlo Park, CA ABSTRACT GC based gas analyzers with Reduction Gas Detector (RGD) and Flame Ionization
More informationGas Chromatography (GC)
Gas Chromatography (GC) Ahmad Aqel Ifseisi Assistant Professor of Analytical Chemistry College of Science, Department of Chemistry King Saud University P.O. Box 2455 Riyadh 11541 Saudi Arabia Office: AA53
More informationSolid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor Compounds in Beer
Solid Phase Micro Extraction of Flavor s in Beer ANNE JUREK USEPA 524.2 Method Validation Using the Evolution Purge and Trap Concentrator and the Centurion WS Autosampler Application Note Environmental
More informationLuminescence transitions. Fluorescence spectroscopy
Luminescence transitions Fluorescence spectroscopy Advantages: High sensitivity (single molecule detection!) Measuring increment in signal against a dark (zero) background Emission is proportional to excitation
More informationINNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT. Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist, EST Analytical
INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, SUPERIOR SUPPORT Presenter: Anne Jurek, Senior Applications Chemist,, pp, EST Analytical Air pollution is a growing problem due to the global economy and industrial development in
More informationValidation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters
Validation of Environmental Water Methods on One System: Considerations for Sample Volume, Purge Parameters and Quality Control Parameters Application Note Abstract Water quality laboratories across the
More informationCH 2252 Instrumental Methods of Analysis Unit V Gas Chromatography. M. Subramanian
CH 2252 Instrumental Methods of Analysis Unit V Gas Chromatography M. Subramanian Assistant Professor Department of Chemical Engineering Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering Kalavakkam 603
More informationSecrets of GC Column Dimensions
Secrets of GC Column Dimensions GC Columns and Consumables Simon Jones Application Engineer May 20, 2008 Slide 1 Secrets of GC Column Dimensions Do I have the right column phase? Resolution Equation Changes
More informationGas Chromatography. Presented By Mr. Venkateswarlu Mpharm KTPC
Gas Chromatography Gas Chromatography Presented By Mr. Venkateswarlu Mpharm KTPC What is Gas Chromatography? It is also known as Gas-Liquid Chromatography (GLC) GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY Separation of gaseous
More informationSUPELCO. Improved Performance for Cyanopropylphenyldimethylpolysiloxane (SPB-1701, SPB-1301) Capillary Columns
Improved Performance for Cyanopropylphenyldimethylpolysiloxane (SPB-1701, SPB-1301) Capillary Columns L.M. Sidisky, Yizeng Ni, Greg Baney, Rodney George, Katherine K. Stenerson 01-0026 T401044 CFK Discussion
More informationOREGON Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program ORELAP Fields of Accreditation ALS Environmental - Simi Valley
MATRIX Reference Code Analyte Code Description ASTM C471M- 14 2014 ASTM D5504-12 2012 3964 Orthorhombic Cyclooctasulfur 4842 1-Propanethiol 6113 2,5-Dimethylthiophene 4544 2-Ethylthiophene 4843 2-Propanethiol
More informationApplication Note S/SL
Analysis of Ultra low Sulfur Compounds in Natural Gas and Gaseous Fuels by Gas Chromatography and Chemiluminescence according to ASTM D Ultra low detection limits Excellent Sensitivity, Repeatability &
More informationOrganochlorine Pesticides by GCxGC-ECD
Organochlorine Pesticides by GCxGC-ECD LECO Corporation; Saint Joseph, Michigan USA Key Words: GCxGC-ECD, Environmental, Quantification 1. Introduction United States Environmental Protection Agency Method
More informationExploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time
Exploring US EPA Method 524 Purge and Trap Variables: Water Vapor Reduction and Minimizing Cycle Time Roger Bardsley, Applications Chemist; Teledyne Tekmar Page 1 Introduction Purge and Trap (P&T) concentrators
More informationA Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound Response When Using Nitrogen as a Purge Gas
A Comparison of Volatile Organic Compound When Using Nitrogen as a Gas Application Note By: Anne Jurek Abstract For many years Helium has been the gas of choice for purging Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).
More informationChromatography. Gas Chromatography
Chromatography Chromatography is essentially the separation of a mixture into its component parts for qualitative and quantitative analysis. The basis of separation is the partitioning of the analyte mixture
More informationAtmospheric Analysis Gases. Sampling and analysis of gaseous compounds
Atmospheric Analysis Gases Sampling and analysis of gaseous compounds Introduction - External environment (ambient air) ; global warming, acid rain, introduction of pollutants, etc - Internal environment
More informationResidual solvents analysis using an Agilent Intuvo 9000 GC system
Residual solvents analysis using an Intuvo GC system Technology advantage: simplified dual column analysis with Flow Chip modularity Introduction USP defines a method for analysis of residual solvents
More informationColumn Dimensions. GC Columns and Consumables. Mark Sinnott Application Engineer. March 12, 2010
Secrets of GC Column Dimensions GC Columns and Consumables Mark Sinnott Application Engineer Folsom California March 12, 2010 Page 1 Secrets of GC Column Dimensions Do I have the right column phase? Resolution
More informationAnalysis. Introduction: necessary. presented. Discussion: As part of be carried. consistent and reliable data. (MoRT) to.
Optimal Conditions for USEPA Method 8260 Analysis Anne Jurek Introduction: Over the past decade, the need for environmental laboratoriess using purge and trap systems to report at or below the Method Detection
More informationTrajan SGE GC Columns
Trajan Scientific and Medical Trajan SGE GC Columns Trajan Scientific and Medical Our focus is on developing and commercializing technologies that enable analytical systems to be more selective, sensitive
More informationMaximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis
Maximizing Sample Throughput In Purge And Trap Analysis LINDSEY PYRON ANNE JUREK INTRODUCTION There are several demands and requirements imposed on chemists performing volatile organic analysis (VOC) in
More informationOptimizing. Abstract: is standardd. procedures. altered to
Optimizing Standard Preparation ANNE JUREK Abstract: Standardd preparation can often be a time consuming, tedious process. The opportunity for human error or inconsistencies between individual preparation
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYTICAL METHODS INTENDED FOR CIPAC COLLABORATIVE STUDY
Page 1 of 13 CIPAC/4105/R GUIDELINES FOR THE DESIGN OF CHROMATOGRAPHIC ANALYTICAL METHODS INTENDED FOR CIPAC COLLABORATIVE STUDY Prepared for CIPAC by Dr M J Tandy*, P M Clarke and B White (UK) The rapid
More informationChemistry Instrumental Analysis Lecture 27. Chem 4631
Chemistry 4631 Instrumental Analysis Lecture 27 Gas Chromatography Introduction GC covers all chromatographic methods in which the mobile phase is gas. It may involve either a solid stationary phase (GSC)
More informationUS EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS
Application Note US EPA Method 8260 with the Tekmar Atomx XYZ P&T System and Agilent 7890B GC/5977A MS Author Amy Nutter Applications Chemist, Teledyne Tekmar Abstract US EPA Method 8260 in conjunction
More informationPRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION OF CHROMATOGRAPHY. Dr. P. Jayachandra Reddy Mpharm PhD Principal & professor KTPC
PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION OF CHROMATOGRAPHY Dr. P. Jayachandra Reddy Mpharm PhD Principal & professor KTPC CHROMATOGRAPHY Laboratory technique for the Separation of mixtures Chroma -"color" and graphein
More informationSelection of a Capillary
Selection of a Capillary GC Column - Series 3 Mark Sinnott Application Engineer March 19, 2009 Page 1 Typical Gas Chromatographic System Mol-Sieve Traps Fixed Restrictors Regulators Injection Port Detector
More informationIdentifying Pesticides with Full Scan, SIM, µecd, and FPD from a Single Injection Application
Identifying Pesticides with Full Scan, SIM, µecd, and FPD from a Single Injection Application Food Safety, Environmental Authors Chin-Kai Meng and Bruce Quimby Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2850 Centerville
More informationRS DYNAMICS ECOPROBE 5. Portable IR/PID Gas Analyzer PID. PID and IR Analyzers
RS DYNAMICS ECOPROBE 5 Portable IR/PID Gas Analyzer PID + IR PID and IR Analyzers General ECOPROBE 5 has two autonomous analyzers in one case. The combination of analyzers provides a set of data designed
More informationPractical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software
Practical Faster GC Applications with High-Efficiency GC Columns and Method Translation Software GC Columns and Consumables Mark Sinnott Application Engineer January 8 th, 2008 Page 1 Questions to Ask
More informationCapillary GC Column Selection and Method Development A Primer on Column Parameters and Instrument Conditions
Capillary GC Column Selection and Method Development A Primer on Column Parameters and Instrument Conditions Michael D. Buchanan September 11, 2014 sigma-aldrich.com/analytical 2012 Sigma-Aldrich Co. All
More informationChlorinated Compounds in Hydrocarbon Streams Using a Halogen Specific Detector (XSD)
Introduction There has been an increase in concern for the detection and removal of organic chloride species from crude aromatic, naphtha, and other hydrocarbon streams. One process called catalytic reforming
More informationAnalytical techniques: Environmental samples. Lecture 2 Universidade do Algarve
Analytical techniques: Environmental samples Lecture 2 Universidade do Algarve Terms, definitions & applications Difference between technique and method: Analytical technique: Fundamental scientific application
More informationFast Determination of Impurities in Propane- Propylene Streams Using a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD) and a New Capillary.
Application Note 36720111 Fast Determination of Impurities in Propane- Propylene Streams Using a Pulsed Flame Photometric Detector (PFPD) and a New Capillary PLOT Column Keywords Pulsed Flame Photometric
More informationDetermination of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air
JSB is an authorised partner of Determination of Volatile Organic s in Air Anne Jurek #126 Introduction Air pollution is a growing problem due to the global economy and industrial development in many countries.
More informationValidation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System
Validation of New VPH GC/MS Method using Multi-Matrix Purge and Trap Sample Prep System Application Note Abstract The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) developed the Method
More informationAccurate Analysis of Fuel Ethers and Oxygenates in a Single Injection without Calibration Standards using GC- Polyarc/FID. Application Note.
Accurate Analysis of Fuel Ethers and Oxygenates in a Single Injection without Calibration Standards using GC- Polyarc/FID Application Note Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Author Andrew Jones Activated
More informationSelection of a Capillary GC Column
Selection of a Capillary GC Column Mark Sinnott Application Engineer March 13, 2008 Page 1 Typical Gas Chromatographic System Mol-Sieve Traps Fixed Restrictors Regulators Injection Port Detector Electrometer
More informationThe Theory of HPLC. Quantitative and Qualitative HPLC
The Theory of HPLC Quantitative and Qualitative HPLC i Wherever you see this symbol, it is important to access the on-line course as there is interactive material that cannot be fully shown in this reference
More informationApplication. Gas Chromatography February Introduction
Ambient Headspace Analysis with the Agilent 7683 Automatic Liquid Sampler Application Gas Chromatography February 1998 Authors Matthew S. Klee and Chin Kai Meng Agilent Technologies, Inc. 2850 Centerville
More informationChapter 11 Conventional Gas Chromatography
Chapter 11 Conventional Gas Chromatography Gas Chromatography GC is the first instrumental chromatographic method developed commercially It is relatively easy to introduce a stable flow and pressure for
More informationPermanent Gas Analysis by Gas Chromatography Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy
Application Note Permanent Gas Analysis by Gas Chromatography Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy Permanent Gas Analysis by Gas Chromatography Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy Introduction Gas Chromatography
More informationResidual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter <467> Methodology
APPLICATION NOTE Gas Chromatography Author: David Scott PerkinElmer, Inc. Shelton, CT Residual Solvents in Pharmaceuticals by USP Chapter Methodology Introduction The synthesis of active pharmaceutical
More informationMonomer Analysis. Analysis by Gas Chromatography WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION. Engineered Solutions, Guaranteed Results.
Monomer Analysis Analysis by Gas Chromatography Engineered Solutions, Guaranteed Results. WASSON - ECE INSTRUMENTATION Polymer Grade Monomer Analysis Monomer Analysis Impurities in feedstocks can adversely
More informationAPPLICATION NOTE. A Capillary Approach to ASTM D3606: Test Method for Determination of Benzene and Toluene in Finished Motor and Aviation Gasoline
A Capillary Approach to ASTM D3606: Test Method for Determination of Benzene and Toluene in Finished Motor and Aviation Gasoline Fast : Cycles in
More informationIntroduction to GC/MS
Why Mass Spectrometry? Introduction to GC/MS A powerful analytical technique used to: 1.Identify unknown compounds 2. Quantify known materials down to trace levels 3. Elucidate the structure of molecules
More informationAnalytical methods for hydrogen fuel QC Thomas Bacquart, Sam Bartlett, Abigail S.O. Morris, Nick Allen, Arul Murugan
Analytical methods for hydrogen fuel QC Thomas Bacquart, Sam Bartlett, Abigail S.O. Morris, Nick Allen, Arul Murugan 06-07/06/2017, HYCORA workshop (Trondheim)Laboratory NPL s Gas Metrology Group Analytical
More informationIntroduction to Capillary GC
?? Kβ? Page 1 Typical GC System Gas supply Injector Detector Data handling GAS Column Oven Page 2 CARRIER GAS Carries the solutes down the column Selection and velocity influences efficiency and retention
More informationGas Chromatography. Introduction
Gas Chromatography Introduction 1.) Gas Chromatography Mobile phase (carrier gas) is a gas - Usually N 2, He, Ar and maybe H 2 - Mobile phase in liquid chromatography is a liquid Requires analyte to be
More informationUSP <467> Headspace Residual Solvent Assay with a HT3 Headspace Instrument
Application Note Abstract The US Pharmacopeia recently released USP as the current monograph for determining residual solvents in pharmaceutical products by static headspace. The USP classified these
More informationThe Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note
The Importance of Area and Retention Time Precision in Gas Chromatography Technical Note Abstract Area and retention time are the two primary measurements in gas chromatography. The precision with which
More informationValidation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA. Method 8260C. Application Note. Abstract. Introduction. Experimental-Instrument Conditions
Validation of Volatile Organic Compound by USEPA Method 8260C Application Note Abstract In order to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in water and soil matrices the USEPA
More information