Upper Bounds for Stern s Diatomic Sequence and Related Sequences


 sa0a0 sa0a0
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Upper Bounds for Stern s Diatomic Sequence and Related Sequences Colin Defant Department of Mathematics University of Florida, U.S.A. Sumitted: Jun 18, 01; Accepted: Oct, 016; Pulished: Oct 14, 016 Mathematics Suject Classifications: 0A0; 11B37 Astract Let (s (n)) n=0 denote Stern s diatomic sequence. For n, we may view s (n) as the numer of partitions of n 1 into powers of with each part occurring at most twice. More generally, for integers, n, let s (n) denote the numer of partitions of n 1 into powers of with each part occurring at most times. Using this cominatorial interpretation of the sequences s (n), we use the transfermatrix method to develop a means of calculating s (n) for certain values of n. This then allows us to derive upper ounds for s (n). In the special case =, our ounds improve upon the current upper ounds for the Stern sequence. We then show that lim sup n s (n) n log φ = ( 1) log φ. Keywords: Stern sequence; Fionacci numer; Lucas numer; overexpansion; transfermatrix method. 1 Introduction Throughout this paper, F m and L m will denote the Fionacci and the Lucas numers. We have F m+ = F m+1 +F m and L m+ = L m+1 +L m for all integers m (including negative integers). We convene to use the initial values F 1 = F = 1, L 1 = 1, and L = 3. We also let φ = 1 + and φ = 1 = 1. The symol N will denote the set of positive φ integers. Prolem B1 of the 014 William Lowell Putnam Competition defines a ase 10 overexpansion of a positive integer N to e an expression of the form N = d k 10 k + d k 1 10 k d the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 1
2 with d k 0 and d i {0, 1,,..., 10} for all i. We may generalize (and slightly modify) this notion to otain the following definition. Definition 1. Let e an integer. A ase overexpansion of a positive integer N is k a word d k d k 1 d 0 over the alphaet {0, 1,..., } such that d k 0 and d i i = N. We refer to the letter d i as the i th digit of the expansion. It is wellknown that each positive integer N has a unique ase overexpansion that does not contain the letter (or digit) ; we refer to this expansion as the ordinary ase expansion of N. The SternBrocot sequence, also known as Stern s diatomic sequence or simply Stern s sequence, is defined y the simple recurrence relations s(n) = s(n) and s(n + 1) = s(n) + s(n + 1) for all nonnegative integers n, where s(0) = 0. This sequence has found numerous applications in numer theory and cominatorics, and it has several interesting properties which relate it to the Fionacci sequence. For n, it is wellknown that s(n) is the numer of ase overexpansions (also known as hyperinary expansions) of n 1 [3]. To generalize Stern s sequence, let s (n) denote the numer of ase overexpansions of n 1. Equivalently, one may wish to think of s (n) as the numer of partitions of n 1 into powers of with each part occurring at most times. We convene to let s (0) = 0 and s (1) = 1. The sequence s (n) satisfies the recurrence relations s (n) = s (n), s (n + 1) = s (n) + s (n + 1), and s (n + i) = s (n + 1) for i {, 3,..., 1}. Equivalently, ( s n ), if n 0 (mod ); ( s (n) = s n 1 ) ( + n 1 s + 1 ), if n 1 (mod ); ( s n i + 1 ) (1), if n i (mod ) and i <. Using (1), one may easily prove the following lemma. Lemma. Let n e a positive integer. If n 1 (mod ), then ( ) ( ) n 1 n + 1 s (n) = s + s. If n + 1 (mod ), then s (n) = s ( n 1 Calkin and Wilf [] determined that ) ( ) n s = 3log φ lim sup n s(n) 1 + φ φ+ n log = , the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8
3 and they asked for the exact value of lim sup s(n). Here, we give upper ounds for the n log φ values of s (n) for any integer, from which we will deduce that lim sup n s (n) n log φ = ( 1) log φ. φ s(n) In particular, lim sup n n = 3log. While preparing this manuscript, the author discovered that Coons and Tyler [4] had already determined this value of the supremum log φ s(n) limit of ; in the same paper, they mention that this prolem actually dates ack n log φ to Berlekamp, Conway, and Guy in 198 [1]. However, the ounds we derive apply to the more general family of sequences s (n) and are stronger than those given in [4]. In addition, our methods of proof are quite different from those used in [4]. Coons and Tyler use clever analytic estimates to prove their results from the recursive definition of s(n). By contrast, we will make heavy use of the interpretation of s (n) as the numer of ase overexpansions of n 1 in order to prove several of our most important results. In particular, we will comine this cominatorial interpretation of s (n) with the transfermatrix method in order to prove Theorem 1. In turn, Theorem 1 will allow us to determine the maximum values of s (n) when n is restricted to certain intervals. For each fixed, the sequence s (n) has a somewhat periodic nature. Our upper ounds are local estimates within the periods; they refine the more gloal estimates given in [4] when =. Determining Maximum Values Throughout this section, fix an integer. Our goal is to derive upper ounds for the numers s (n), particularly those values of n that are slightly larger than a power of (we will make this precise soon). To do so, we will make use of the following sequence. Definition 3. Let h 1 = h = 1. For m 3, let h m = 1 + m 3 m i. Alternatively, we may calculate h m using the recurrence relation { h m 1 + 1, if m; h m = h m 1 + 1, if m () along with the initial value h 1 = 1. For example, h 3 = + 1, h 4 = + 1, h = , and h 6 = It is important to note that h m 1 (mod ) for all m N. We state the following lemma for easy reference, although we omit the proof ecause it is fairly straightforward. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 3
4 Lemma 4. For any positive integer m, h m+1 h m = m + ( 1) m. + 1 The following lemma lists three simple ut useful oservations aout the numers s (n). We omit the proof ecause it follows easily from (1). Lemma. Let n and k e nonnegative integers with k n k+1. i. If n = j k for some j {1,,..., 1}, then s (n) = 1. ii. If k = 1, then s (n), where equality holds if and only if n 1 (mod ). iii. If k 1 and n 1 (mod ), then s (n) = s (n ) for some integer n with k 1 n k. Proposition 6. Let k and n e nonnegative integers with k n < k+1. We may write n uniquely in the form n = j k + t, where j {1,,..., 1} and t {0, 1,..., k 1}. We have s (n) F k+, where equality holds if and only if t = h k or t = h k+1. Proof. That we may write n uniquely in the form n = j k + t is trivial. The proof of the rest of the proposition is y induction on k. The case k = 0 is immediate from the first part of Lemma. The case k = 1 follows from the second part of the same lemma. Now, assume k > 1. We divide the proof into three cases. Case 1: In this case, suppose t = h k or t = h k+1. We will assume that t = h k and that k is even; a similar argument holds if k is odd or t = h k+1. Thus, n = j k + h k. Because k is even, we may use () to write h k = h k and h k 1 = h k + 1. Furthermore, h k 1 (mod ) ecause k is even. Since n h k 1 (mod ), we have y Lemma that s (n) = s ( n 1 = s ( j k + h k 1 1 ) ( ) ( n s = s j k + h ) ( k 1 + s j k 1 + h ) k ) ( ) ( ) ( ) + s j k 1 + h k 1 = s j k + h k + s j k 1 + h k 1. ( ) ( ) By induction on k, s j k + h k = Fk and s j k 1 + h k 1 = Fk+1. Thus, s (n) = F k + F k+1 = F k+, as desired. Case : In this case, suppose n 1 (mod ). By Lemma, there exists an integer n with k 1 n k such that s (n) = s (n ). If n = k, then, using Lemma again, s (n) = 1 < F k+. If n < k, then it follows from induction on k that s (n) = s (n ) F k+1 < F k+. Case 3: In this final case, suppose n 1 (mod ) and that t h k and t h k+1. Suppose, y way of contradiction, that s (n) F k+. Since t n 1 (mod ), we may write t = t + 1 for some integer t < k 1. Using (1), we have s (n) = s ( n 1 ) + s ( n 1 ) + 1 = s (j k 1 + t ) + s (j k 1 + t + 1). (3) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 4
5 If t 0, 1 (mod ), then we know from Lemma and the fact that k 1 j k 1 + t < j k 1 + t + 1 k that s (j k 1 + t ) = s (v 1 ) and s (j k 1 + t + 1) = s (v ) for some integers v 1, v [ k, k 1 ]. By (3) and induction on k, it follows that if t 0, 1 (mod ), then s (n) = s (v 1 ) + s (v ) = F k + F k < F k+. This is a contradiction, so t 0, 1 (mod ). We will assume that t 0 (mod ); a similar argument may e used to derive a contradiction in the case t 1 (mod ). Write t = t. Because t < k 1 and j 1, j k 1 + t + 1 k. We know that j k 1 + t + 1 k ecause t 0 (mod ). Therefore, we have the inequalities k j k + t < k 1 < j k 1 + t + 1 < k. We see y (3) and induction that s (n) = s (j k 1 +t )+s (j k 1 +t +1) = s (j k +t )+s (j k 1 +t +1) F k +F k+1 =F k+, where the equality s (j k 1 +t ) = s (j k +t ) is immediate from (1). This last inequality must e an equality since we are assuming s (n) F k+, so we must have s (j k +t ) = F k and s (j k 1 +t +1) = F k+1. The induction hypothesis states that this is only possile if t {h k, h k 1 } and t +1 {h k 1, h k }. Suppose first that t = h k and t +1 = h k 1. We have h k 1 = h k + 1, so it follows from () that k must e even. Using () again, we see that h k = h k = (t + 1) + 1 = t, which contradicts our assumption that t h k. Similarly, if t = h k 1 and t + 1 = h k, then we may derive the contradiction t = h k+1. It is clearly impossile to have t = h k 1 and t + 1 = h k 1 since t = t. Therefore, we are left to conclude that t = h k and t + 1 = h k. If k is even, then we may use () to write t = t = h k 1 = h k 1 = (h k + 1) = h k = t, which is impossile. This means that k must e odd, so h k = h k y (). Since h k = t + 1 = t + 1 = h k + 1, we conclude that h k 1 = h k. It is easy to see from Definition 3 that this is only possile if k = 3. Hence, t = h 1 = 1, t = h 3 1 =, and t = t + 1 = + 1. However, this means that t = h 4 = h k+1, which is our final contradiction ecause we assumed t {h k, h k+1 }. Now that we know the maximum values of s (n) for k n < k+1, we may easily derive the following result. Corollary 7. We have lim sup n s (n) n log φ ( 1) log φ. Proof. We will need Binet s formula for the Fionacci numers, which states that F m = φm ( φ) m for all m Z. For each positive integer k, let u k = k + h k. Let i k = ( 1)h k k, and oserve that { 1, if k; i k = 1, if k. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8
6 We have φ k+ ( φ) (k+) 1 φ (k+) ( φ) (k+) lim = lim k ( k+ + i k ) log φ k φ (k+) ( k+ + i k ) = lim 1 φ (k+) ( φ) (k+) = 1. log φ k (1 + i k / k+ ) log φ By Proposition 6 and Binet s formula, s (u k ) u log φ k = F k+ ( k + h k ) log φ = φk+ ( φ) (k+) ( k + h k ) log φ = φk+ ( φ) (k+) ( k + k +i k 1 )log φ so lim sup n = ( 1) log φ s (n) s (u k ) lim n log φ k u log φ k φ k+ ( φ) (k+) ( k+ + i k ) log φ, = ( 1) log φ. s (n) We now wish to show that lim sup n n ( 1) log φ. If k + h log φ k < n < k+1 for some positive integer k, then we know from Proposition 6 that We saw in the proof of Corollary 7 that s (n) n log φ F k+ n log φ = s ( k + h k ) n log φ < s ( k + h k ) ( k + h k ) log φ. lim k s ( k + h k ) ( k + h k ) log φ = ( 1) log φ. Hence, we need only find a sufficiently strong upper ound for s (n) when k n k +h k for some positive integer k. For this purpose, we make the following definitions. Definition 8. For nonnegative integers k, r, y, let { I(k, r, y) = n N: k < n k + } y r i, and µ(k, r, y) = max{s (n): n I(k, r, y)}, ν(k, r, y) = min{n I(k, r, y): s (n) = µ(k, r, y)}. Our goal is to calculate µ(k, r, y) for any given nonnegative integers k, r, y that satisfy y < r < k 1. This will allow us to to derive tight upper ounds for all integers n that satisfy k n k + h k for some k y choosing appropriate values of r and y. One might think that a simple inductive argument ased on the recurrence relation (1) should e ale to derive our upper ounds quite effortlessly. However, the author has found that attempts to prove upper ounds for s (n) using induction often fail or ecome the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 6
7 incredily convoluted. Indeed, the reader may wish to look at [4] in order to appreciate the surprising amount of ingenuity that Coons and Tyler need for the derivation of their upper ounds (which are weaker than ours) in the specific case =. Therefore, we shall prove a sequence of lemmas in order to develop more cominatorial means of calculating µ(k, r, y) and ν(k, r, y). Lemma 9. Let a t a t 1 a 0 e the ordinary ase expansion of a positive integer n. Let c l c l 1 c 0 e a ase overexpansion of n. Set c i = 0 for all integers i with l < i t. For any m {0, 1,..., t}, {0, 1, }, if a m = 0; c m {0, 1, }, if a m = 1; {a m 1, a m }, otherwise. Proof. We know that t a i i = t c i i ecause a t a t 1 a 0 and c l c l 1 c 0 are ase overexpansions of the same numer. Therefore, for any j {0, 1,..., t}, j a i i j c i i (mod j+1 ). (4) j j If a i i > c i i for some j {0, 1,..., t}, then it follows from (4) and the fact that a i {0, 1,..., 1} for all i that j c i i j+1 + j a i i j+1 + j ( 1) i = 1, which is impossile. Hence, j a i i j c i i for all j {0, 1,..., t}. Choose some m {0, 1,..., t}. Since c i for all i, we have m c i i c m m + It follows that m 1 a m m i = (c m + 1) m + m a i i m m c i i < (c m + ) m, i+1 < (c m + ) m. () so c m a m 1. To complete the proof, we simply need to show that if c m > a m, then either a m = 0 and m { 1, } or a m = 1 and c m =. Suppose c m > a m. We have m a i i = a m m + m 1 a i i a m m + m 1 c i i < m c i i the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 7
8 and m a i i (y (4)), so we know from () that m a i i m+1 + m c i i (mod m+1 ) m c i i < m+1 + (c m + ) m. This implies that a m m < m+1 + c m m + m, so c m a m >. This is impossile if a m {0, 1} ecause c m. If a m = 0, we must have either c m = 1 or c m =, and if a m = 1, then we must have c m =. Lemma 10. Let k, r, y e nonnegative integers with y < r < k 1. If a t a t 1 a 0 is the ordinary ase expansion of ν(k, r, y) 1, then t = k, a k = 1, a j = a 0 = 0 for all j {r + 1,..., k 1}, and a i {0, 1} for all i {0, 1,..., k}. Proof. Let ν = ν(k, r, y), and let a t a t 1 a 0 e the ordinary ase expansion of ν 1. It follows from the fact that ν I(k, r, y) that t = k, a k = 1, and a j = 0 for all j {r + 1,..., k 1}. We still need to show that a 0 = 0 and a i {0, 1} for all i {0, 1,..., k}. Suppose, for the sake of finding a contradiction, that a m {, 3,..., 1} for some m {0, 1,..., k}. Because a k = 1, we know that m {0, 1,..., k 1}. Let ν = ν (a m 1) m. The ordinary ase expansion of ν 1 is simply the word otained from a k a k 1 a 0 y replacing the m th digit (which is a m ) with 1. Oserve that ν < ν and ν I(k, r, y) since k < k + m = k + a m m (a m 1) m ν (a m 1) m = ν. Hence, y the definition of ν in Definition 8, s (ν ) < s (ν). Choose some ase overexpansion c l c l 1 c 0 of ν 1, and let f(c l c l 1 c 0 ) e the word otained from c l c l 1 c 0 y replacing the m th digit (which is c m ) with c m a m + 1. Lemma 9 implies that c m a m + 1 {0, 1} ecause c m {a m 1, a m }. Therefore, f(c l c l 1 c 0 ) is a ase overexpansion of ν 1. We see that f is an injection from the set of ase overexpansions of ν 1 to the set of ase overexpansions of ν 1. This contradicts the fact that s (ν ) < s (ν), so we conclude that a i {0, 1} for all i {0, 1,..., k}. We are left with the task of showing that a 0 = 0. Suppose a 0 0. By the preceding paragraph, we must have a 0 = 1. This means that ν (mod ), so ( ) ( ) ( ) ν ν ν s (ν) = s + 1 < s + s + 1 = s (ν 1) y (1). Since ν (mod ) and ν > k y definition, we know that ν 1 > k. Therefore, ν 1 I(k, r, y) and s (ν) < s (ν 1), which contradicts the definition of ν. It follows from this contradiction that a 0 = 0. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 8
9 Lemma 10 hints that it is of interest to enumerate the ase overexpansions of positive integers whose ordinary ase expansions use only the digits 0 and 1. Let e 0, e 1,..., e l e nonnegative integers with e 0 < e 1 < < e l, and let n = e 0 + e e l. Let Q i denote the operation that changes one ase overexpansion of n into another y increasing the i th digit of an expansion y and decreasing the (i + 1) th digit of the expansion y 1. The operation Q i can only e used if the i th digit of the expansion under consideration is a 0. If we use the operation Q i when the (i + 1) th digit of the expansion is a 0, then this digit is immediately converted to a 1 and the (i + ) th digit is reduced y 1. If the (i + ) th digit is also 0, then it is immediately converted to a 1 and the (i + 3) th digit is reduced y 1. This process continues until a nonzero digit is reduced y 1. After using the operation Q i, any leading 0 s are erased from the expansion. The transformation of 0 s to ( 1) s is analogous to the transformation of 0 s to 9 s that occurs when the numer 1 is sutracted from the numer 10000, resulting in As an example, only the operations Q, Q 4, Q, Q 6, and Q 8 may e used to transform the expansion into a new expansion. The operation Q 4 changes the expansion into the expansion 100( 1)( 1)1011. The operation Q 8 first changes the expansion into ; the leading 0 is then erased, yielding We will transform the ordinary ase expansion of n into a ase overexpansion c t c t 1 c 0 of n y repeated use of the operations just descried. At each step, we will choose the value of c ei for some i {0, 1,..., l} while simultaneously deciding the values of c j for all j {e i 1 +1, e i 1 +,..., e i 1} (or all j < e i in the case i = 0). We proceed y permanently deciding the values of c 0, c 1,..., c e0, then permanently deciding the values of c e0 +1, c e0 +,..., c e1, and so on until we decide the values of c el 1 +1, c el 1 +,..., c el. We omit c el from the word c t c t 1 c 0 if c el = 0; in this case, t = e l 1. For the sake of providing a concrete example of this process, we will suppose that {e 0, e 1,..., e l } = {, 4,, 9, 11} and = 7. Here, the ordinary ase 7 expansion of n is Since e 0 =, we first choose the value of c (while simultaneously deciding the values of c 0 and c 1 ). There is only one way to set c = 1; namely, we keep the same expansion If we want to have c = 0, then we could either perform the operation Q 0 to get the expansion or perform the operation Q 1 to get the expansion Similarly, if we want to have c = 7, then we could either perform the operations Q 0 and then Q to otain or perform the operations Q 1 and then Q to get That is, there are e 0 = ways to set c = 0 and e 0 = ways to set c = 7. By Lemma 9, 0, 1, and 7 are the only possile values of c. For this example, we will assume we chose to use the operations Q 1 and Q to get the expansion Next, we choose the value of c 4 ecause e 1 = 4. Because we used the operation Q, the 4 th digit of the expansion was temporarily converted into a 0. This means that there is no way to set c 4 = 1 using the operations Q i. There is one way to set c 4 = 0; just keep the expansion Similarly, there is one way to set c 4 = 7; just use the operation Q 4 to otain We will assume that we make the former choice and keep the expansion Next, we choose the value of c since e =. The only way to set c = 1 is to keep the expansion the same. Since we have already determined c 0, c 1, c, c 3, c 4, we cannot perform any of the operations Q 0, Q 1, Q, Q 3, Q 4 in order to the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 9
10 u 0 u 1 u u 3 u 4 u v 0 v 1 v v 3 v 4 v w 0 w 1 w w w 4 w 0 Figure 1: The edgeweighted digraph G for the given example. Note that each of the vertices u 0, v 0, w 0 is drawn twice. temporarily reduce the th digit of the expansion y 1. In other words, c is stuck with the value 1. We now have the expansion , and we wish to choose the value of c 9 (since e 3 = 9) while simultaneously determining the values of c 6, c 7, c 8. Again, the only way to make c 9 = 1 is to keep the expansion To make c 9 = 0, we could use Q 6 to get , use Q 7 to get , or use Q 8 to get To set c 9 = 7, we could use Q 6 and then Q 9 to otain , use Q 7 and then Q 9 to get , or use Q 8 and then Q 9 to get Hence, there are e 3 e 1 = 3 ways to set c 9 = 0 and e 3 e 1 = 3 ways to set c 9 = 7. We will assume that we choose to use Q 7 (and not Q 9 ) to otain the expansion All that is left to do is decide the value of c 11 (while simultaneously determining c 10 ). We cannot set c 11 = 7 ecause there is no nonzero digit to the left of the 11 th digit from which to orrow. Alternatively, one could oserve that if c 11 = 7, then c 11 c 10 c 0 would e a ase 7 overexpansion for a numer strictly larger than n. We can, however, keep the expansion if we wish to set c 11 = 1. There is one way (ecause e 4 e 3 1 = 1) to set c 11 = 0; simply use the operation Q 10 to otain the expansion Figure 1 depicts an edgeweighted digraph G which encodes all the possile choices that we could have made in this example. The graph has only fifteen vertices, ut we have drawn each of the vertices u 0, v 0, w 0 twice in order to improve the aesthetics of the image. The vertex u i corresponds to choosing to set c ei = 0. The vertex v i corresponds to setting c ei = 1. The vertex w i corresponds to setting c ei = 7. The weights of the edges correspond to the numer of choices possile. For example, if we have chosen to let c = 0 (corresponding to the vertex u ), then there are three ways to set c 9 = 7 (corresponding to the vertex w 3 ). Thus, there is an edge of weight 3 from u to w 3. After setting c 9 = 7, it is impossile to set c 11 = 1, so there is an edge of weight 0 from w 3 to v 4. The reader might ask why there are edges from u 4, v 4, w 4 to u 0, v 0, w 0. We include these edges ecause the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 10
11 we wish to interpret ase 7 overexpansion of n in terms of closed walks in the graph G. There are edges of weight from u 4, v 4, w 4 to u 0 ecause there are two ways to set c = 0, regardless of the value of c 11 (recall that we choose c efore choosing c 11 ). Similarly, there are edges of weight 1 from u 4, v 4, w 4 to v 0 and edges of weight from u 4, v 4, w 4 to w 0. Suppose we want to construct a ase 7 overexpansion of n in which c = 0, c 4 = 1, c = 1, c 9 = 7, and c 11 = 0. This choice of the values of c ei for i {0, 1,, 3, 4} corresponds to the closed walk (u 0, v 1, v, w 3, u 4, u 0 ) in G. The weight of this walk (which we calculate as the product of the weights of its edges) is 6, so there are 6 ase 7 overexpansions of n with these specific values of c, c 4, c, c 9, c 11. As another example, there are no ase 7 overexpansions of n in which c = 7, c 4 = 7, c = 1, c 9 = 0, and c 11 = 1 ecause the weight of the closed walk (w 0, w 1, v, u 3, v 4, w 0 ) is 0. We are finally in a position to enumerate the ase 7 overexpansions of n. To do so, we will need the following definition. Definition 11. For any real t, let t 1 t M t = t 1 t and N t = t 1 t t 1 t If we put the vertices of G in the order u 0, v 0, w 0, u 1, v 1, w 1,..., u 4, v 4, w 4, then the adjacency matrix of G (written as a lock matrix) is O M d1 O O O O O M d O O A = O O O M d3 O O O O O B, C O O O O where d i = e i e i 1 1, e l e l B = e l e l = , C =. e 0 1 e 0 e 0 1 e 0 e 0 1 e 0 = and O denotes the 3 3 zero matrix. The total numer of ase 7 overexpansions of n is equal to the sum of the weights of the closed walks of length in G that start at u 0, v 0, or w 0. This, in turn, is equal to the sum of the first three diagonal entries of A. Using elementary linear algera, we see that the first three rows and the first three columns of A intersect in a 3 3 lock given y M 1 M M 3 BC. Therefore, the sum of the first three diagonal entries of A is Tr(M 1 M M 3 BC), where Tr denotes the trace of a matrix. One easily calculates this value to e 18. We now state this result in greater generality (and in a slightly different form). Sketching the proof of the following theorem, we trust the reader to see that the method used in the preceding example is representative of the method used in general., the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 11
12 Theorem 1. Let e 0, e 1,..., e l e nonnegative integers with e 0 < e 1 < < e l (where l 1). Let d i = e i e i 1 1 for all i {1,,..., l}. The numer of ase overexpansions of the numer e 0 + e e l is given y Tr(N e0 M d1 M d M dl ). Proof. Let n = e 0 + e e l. Let O M d1 O O O O O O M d O O O O O O O O O A = , O O O O M dl 1 O O O O O O B C O O O O O where B = d l 1 0 d l and C = e 0 1 e 0 e 0 1 e 0 e 0 1 e 0 Let G e the edgeweighted digraph with vertex set {u 0, v 0, w 0, u 1, v 1, w 1,..., u l, v l, w l } and adjacency matrix A. Suppose we wish to construct a ase overexpansion c t c t 1 c 0 of n. As in the example aove, specifying the values of c e0, c e1,..., c el (each such value must e 0, 1, or y Lemma 9) corresponds to choosing a closed walk of length l + 1 in G starting at u 0, v 0, or w 0. The weight of this walk is the numer of ase overexpansions c el c el 1 c 0 of n that have the specified values of c e0, c e1,..., c el. Therefore, the total numer of ase overexpansions of n is equal to the sum of the first three diagonal entries of A l+1. The first three rows and the first three columns of A l+1 intersect in the 3 3 lock M d1 M d M dl 1 BC, so the numer of ase overexpansions of n is Tr(M d1 M d M dl 1 BC). Now, one may easily calculate that BC = M dl N e0. Therefore, using the fact that Tr(XY ) = Tr(Y X) for any square matrices X, Y of the same size, we conclude that Tr(M d1 M d M dl 1 BC) = Tr(M d1 M d M dl 1 M dl N e0 ) = Tr(N e0 M d1 M d M dl ). x 1 z x 1 Definition 13. We define Ξ = x 1 z x 1 : x 1, x, x 3, z 0, z 0 and Ξ = x x 3 x Ξ {I 3 }, where I 3 is the 3 3 identity matrix. We omit the proofs of the following three lemmas ecause they are fairly straightforward. Lemma 14. The set Ξ is closed under matrix multiplication, and Ξ is a monoid under matrix multiplication. For any nonnegative real numer u, M u, N u Ξ.. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 1
13 Lemma 1. Let X e a 3 3 matrix with nonnegative real entries, and let Y Ξ. If the second diagonal entry (the entry in the second row and the second column) of X is positive, then Tr(XY ) > 0. Lemma 16. For any positive integer t, F t F t 1 F t M1 t = F t F t 1 F t. F t 1 F t F t 1 The following lemma attempts to gain information aout the ordinary ase expansion of ν(k, r, y) 1 when y < r < k 1. By Lemma 10, all of the digits in that expansion are 0 s and 1 s, so we may write ν(k, r, y) 1 = e 0 + e e l for some nonnegative integers e 0, e 1,..., e l that satisfy e 0 < e 1 < < e l = k. Because ν(k, r, y) I(k, r, y), we have y k ν(k, r, y) 1 < k + r i. It follows that e l 1 j r j for all j {0, 1,..., y}, where equality cannot hold for all j. Hence, we may consider the smallest nonnegative integer λ such that e l 1 λ r λ 1. Lemma 17. Let k, r, y e nonnegative integers with y < r < k 1. Let a k a k 1 a 0 e the ordinary ase expansion of ν(k, r, y) 1, and write ν(k, r, y) 1 = e 0 + e e l, where e 0, e 1,..., e l are nonnegative integers that satisfy e 0 < e 1 < < e l = k. Let λ e the smallest nonnegative integer such that e l 1 λ r λ 1. There does not exist i {1,,..., e l 1 λ } such that a i = a i+1. Proof. Let ν = ν(k, r, y). Note that it follows from the preceding paragraph that λ y. Because ν 1 = e 0 + e e l, we have { 1, if i = e j for some j; a i = (6) 0, otherwise. for all i {0, 1,..., k}. In particular, e 0 > 0 ecause a 0 = 0 y Lemma 10. We will let d j = e j e j 1 1 for all j {1,,..., l}. Suppose, y way of contradiction, that a i = a i+1 for some i {1,,..., e l 1 λ }, and let m e the smallest such index i. We have five cases to consider. First, assume a 1 = 1 and a m = a m+1 = 0. By the minimality of m, we see that a i = 0 for all nonnegative even integers i < m and a j = 1 for all positive odd integers j < m. In addition, m must e even. Therefore, setting t = m, we have e j = j + 1 for all j {0, 1,..., t}. This means that d j = 1 for all j {1,,..., t}. It follows from (6) and the assumption that a m = a m+1 = 0 that e t = m 1 < m < m + 1 < e t+1 < e t+ < < e l = k. (7) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 13
14 Note that t < l 1 λ ecause e t < m {1,,..., e l 1 λ }. Let us write ν 1 = 1 + t ei+1 +. We have i=t+1 ν 1 = 1 + t ei+1 + i=t m n + n=1 i=t e t+1 n=1 n + i=t+1 < e t i=t+1 = e t l 1 λ i=t+1 + i=l λ Recall from the paragraph immediately preceding this theorem that e l 1 j r j for all j {0, 1,..., y}. Since λ is the smallest nonnegative integer such that e l 1 λ r λ 1, e l 1 i = r i for all nonnegative integers i < λ. Furthermore, e l = k, so we find that λ 1 = k + r i. Therefore, i=l λ ν 1 < e t l 1 λ i=t+1. λ 1 λ 1 + k + r i < el 1 λ+1 + k + λ 1 k + r λ + r i k + y r i, where we have used the inequalities e l 1 λ r λ 1 and λ y. This shows that ν 1 I(k, r, y), so s (ν 1 ) s (ν) y the definition of ν. Our goal is to derive a contradiction y showing that s (ν 1 ) > s (ν). Let B = M dt+ M dt+3 M dl. We saw that t < l 1 λ, so t + 1 < l. This shows that the matrix product defining B is nonempty. Lemma 14 implies that B Ξ. Now, e 0 = (0) + 1 = 1. By Theorem 1, s (ν) = Tr(N 1 M d1 M d M dl ) = Tr(N 1 M t 1M dt+1 B). We may write ν 1 1 = e 0 + e e l, where e j = e j + 1 for all j {0, 1,..., t} and e j = e j for all j {t + 1,..., l}. Setting d j = e j e j 1 for all j {1,,..., l}, we have y Theorem 1. Consequently, s (ν 1 ) = Tr(N e 0 M d 1 M d M d l ) = Tr(N M t 1M dt+1 1B) s (ν 1 ) s (ν) = Tr((N M t 1M dt+1 1 N 1 M t 1M dt+1 )B). We remark that one must take care when considering the case t = 0. In this case, M t 1 is the 3 3 identity matrix. A straightforward calculation invoking Lemma 16 shows that N M t 1M dt+1 1 N 1 M t 1M dt+1 = F t+ N dt+1, r i the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 14
15 so s (ν 1 ) s (ν) = F t+ Tr(N dt+1 B). Because d t+1 = e t+1 e t 1 (m + ) (m 1) 1 = y (7), we see that N dt+1 is a matrix with nonnegative entries whose second diagonal entry is positive. By Lemma 1, s (ν 1 ) s (ν) > 0, which is our desired contradiction. Next, we assume a 1 = 1 and a m = a m+1 = 1. The proof is similar to that given in the preceding paragraph. It follows from the minimality of m that a i = 0 for all even nonnegative integers i < m and a j = 1 for all odd positive integers j < m. Also, m must e odd. Let t = m 1. We have e j = j + 1 for all j {0, 1,..., t} and e t = m < m + 1 = e t+1 < e t+ < < e l = k. We know from Lemma 10 that a j = 0 for all j {r +1,..., k 1}, so m < r. This implies t 1 that e t+1 = m + 1 r < k = e l. Setting ν = 1 + ei+1 +, we have t 1 ν 1 = ei+1 + = t ei 1 + i=1 i=t+1 i=t+1 t 1 = ei < ν 1 < k + i=t+1 i=t+1 y r i, so ν I(k, r, y) and ν < ν. It follows from the definition of ν that s (ν ) < s (ν). As in the preceding case, we let B = M dt+ M dt+3 M dl. The matrix product defining B is nonempty ecause e t+1 < e l. In addition, B Ξ, so we may write B = ξ 1 ξ ξ 1 ξ 1 ξ ξ 1 ξ 3 ξ 4 ξ 3 for some nonnegative real ξ 1, ξ, ξ 3, ξ 4 with ξ > 0. Since d t+1 = e t+1 e t 1 = (m + 1) m 1 = 0, we have y Theorem 1 that s (ν) = Tr(N 1 M t 1M 0 B) and s (ν ) = Tr(N M t 1B). As in the previous paragraph, note that M1 t is the 3 3 identity matrix if t = 0. By elementary calculations that make use of Lemma 16, we find that N M1 t N 1 M1M t 0 = F t Thus, s (ν ) s (ν) = Tr((N M t 1 N 1 M t 1M 0 )B) = F t+1 (ξ 3 + ξ 4 ) 0, the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 1
16 which is a contradiction. We now assume a 1 = 0, a = 1, and a m = a m+1 = 0. Invoking the minimality of m, we see that a i = 1 for all positive even integers i < m and a j = 1 for all positive odd integers j < m. The index m must e odd. Let t = m 3. We find that e j = j + for all j {0, 1,..., t}, so d j = 1 for all j {1,,..., t}. Coupling (6) with the assumption that a m = a m+1 = 0 shows us that e t = m 1 < m < m + 1 < e t+1 < e t+ < < e l = k. (8) Thus, t < l 1 λ ecause e t < m {1,,..., e l 1 λ }. Let ν 3 = 1++ We find that e t+1 n=1 ν 3 1 = + n + i=t+1 t ei+1 + < e t i=t+1 i=t+1 e t+1 n + n=1 = e t i=t+1 l 1 λ i=t+1 t ei i=l λ Because e l = k and e l 1 i = r i for all nonnegative integers i < λ, we have Consequently, ν 3 1 e t l 1 λ i=t+1 i=l λ λ 1 = k + r i. λ 1 λ 1 + k + r i < el 1 λ+1 + k + λ 1 k + r λ + r i k + y r i,. r i i=t+1 where we have used the inequalities e l 1 λ r λ 1 and λ y. It follows that ν 3 I(k, r, y), so s (ν 3 ) s (ν). Let B = M dt+ M dt+3 M dl. As in the previous two cases, the matrix product defining B is nonempty (ecause t + 1 < l λ l) and B Ξ. Note that e 0 = (0) + =. We have s (ν) = Tr(N M1M t dt+1 B) and s (ν 3 ) = Tr(N 1 M1 t+1 M dt+1 1B), so s (ν 3 ) s (ν) = Tr((N 1 M t+1 1 M dt+1 1 N M t 1M dt+1 )B). Using Lemma 16, one may easily show that N 1 M t+1 1 M dt+1 1 N M t 1M dt+1 = F t+3 N dt+1,. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 16
17 so s (ν 3 ) s (ν) = F t+3 Tr(N dt+1 B). Because d t+1 = e t+1 e t 1 (m + ) (m 1) 1 = y (8), there follows that N dt+1 is a matrix with nonnegative entries whose second diagonal entry is positive. By Lemma 1, s (ν 3 ) s (ν) > 0, a contradiction. The fourth case we consider is that in which a 1 = 0, a = 1, and a m = a m+1 = 1. By now the reader is proaly familiar with the general pattern of the proof. We use the minimality of m to say that a i = 1 for all positive even integers i < m and a j = 1 for all positive odd integers j < m. The index m must e even. Let t = m, and oserve that e j = j + for all j {0, 1,..., t} and that e t = m < m + 1 = e t+1 < e t+ < < e l = k. We know that m < r ecause Lemma 10 tells us that a j = 0 for all j {r + 1,..., k 1}. t 1 Therefore, e t+1 r < k = e l. Let ν 4 = ei+1 +. We have = + t 1 ν 4 1 = + ei+1 + t ei 1 + i=1 i=t+1 = i=t+1 t ei 1 + i=t+1 t 1 = + ei i=t+1 i=t+1 < ν 1 < k + y r i, so ν 4 I(k, r, y) and ν 4 < ν. This implies that s (ν 4 ) < s (ν). Let B =M dt+ M dt+3 M dl. The matrix product defining B is nonempty ecause e t+1 < e l, and B Ξ. Consequently, ξ 1 ξ ξ 1 B = ξ 1 ξ ξ 1 ξ 3 ξ 4 ξ 3 for some nonnegative real ξ 1, ξ, ξ 3, ξ 4 with ξ > 0. Because d t+1 = e t+1 e t 1 = (m + 1) m 1 = 0, we may use Theorem 1 to deduce that One may show that so s (ν) = Tr(N M t 1M 0 B) and s (ν 4 ) = Tr(N 1 M t+1 1 B). N 1 M1 t+1 N M1M t 0 = F t s (ν 4 ) s (ν) = Tr((N 1 M t+1 1 N M t 1M 0 )B) = F t+ (ξ 3 + ξ 4 ) 0., the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 17
18 This is our desired contradiction. Finally, we consider the case in which a 1 = a = 0. In this case, ν 1 (mod 3 ). y y Because ν 1 < k + r i and ν 1 k + r i 0 (mod ), it follows that ν 1 k + y r i. This means that ν + I(k, r, y), so s (ν + ) s (ν) y the definition of ν. As ν (mod 3 ), we find y (1) and Lemma that ( ) ( ) (ν + ) 1 (ν + ) + 1 s (ν + ) = s + s and ( ) (( ν 1 ν ) ) 1 s + 1 = s (( ν ) ) 1 > s (( ν ) ) 1 + s + 1 ( ) ( ) ν 1 ν 1 = s = s 3. Therefore, ( ) ( ) (ν + ) 1 (ν + ) + 1 s (ν + ) = s + s ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ν 1 ν 1 ν 1 ν 1 = s s + 1 > s s = s (ν). With this contradiction, the proof is complete. Lemma 18. Preserving the notation from Lemma 17, we have e l 1 λ = r λ 1. Proof. The proof is very similar to those of the first and third cases considered in the proof of Lemma 17. Suppose, y way of contradiction, that e l 1 λ r λ, and let l 1 λ ν = 1 + ei+1 + and ν = ν +. We have ν 1 < ν 1 = + < r λ + i=l λ i=l λ l 1 λ +1 + i=l λ e l 1 λ +1 n=1 n + λ 1 = r λ + k + r i = k + i=l λ r λ 1 n=1 λ r i k + n + y r i, i=l λ λ 1 where we convene to let r i = 0 if λ = 0. Therefore, ν, ν I(k, r, y). This means that s (ν ), s (ν ) s (ν), so we will derive a contradiction y showing that s (ν ) > s (ν) or s (ν ) > s (ν). the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 18
19 Let B = M dl λ+1 M dl λ+ M dl, where we define B to e the 3 3 identity matrix if λ = 0. By Lemma 14, B Ξ. To ease our notation, let t = l 1 λ and q = d l λ. We have s (ν) = Tr(N e0 M1M t q B), s (ν ) = Tr(N e0 +1M1M t q 1 B), and s (ν ) = Tr(N 1 M e0 1M1M t q 1 B). It is straightforward to show that N M1M t q 1 N 1 M1M t q = F t+ N q and N 1 M1 t+1 M q 1 N M1M t q = F t+3 N q. If λ = 0, then it follows from our assumption that e l 1 λ r λ that q = e l λ e l 1 λ 1 = e l e l 1 1 = k e l 1 1 k (r ) 1 3. If λ > 0, then q = e l λ e l 1 λ 1 = e l 1 (λ 1) e l 1 λ 1 = (r (λ 1)) e l 1 λ 1 (r (λ 1)) (r λ ) 1 = 3. In either case, q 3, so oth F t+ N q and F t+3 N q are 3 3 matrices with nonnegative real entries whose second diagonal entries are positive. It follows from Lemma 1 that if e 0 = 1, then s (ν ) s (ν) = Tr((N M t 1M q 1 N 1 M t 1M q )B) = Tr(F t+ N q B) > 0. Similarly, if e 0 =, then s (ν ) s (ν) = Tr((N 1 M t+1 1 M q 1 N M t 1M q )B) = Tr(F t+3 N q B) > 0. This is a contradiction, so the proof is complete. For nonnegative integers k, r, y with y < r < k 1, let w = a k a k 1 a 0 e the ordinary ase expansion of ν(k, r, y) 1. We summarize here the information we have gained aout this expansion. From Lemma 10, we know that a i {0, 1} for all i. We know from the same lemma that a k = 1, a 0 = 0, and a j = 0 for all j {r + 1,..., k 1}. Therefore, w = 10 k r 1 v, where v is a word of length r +1 over the inary alphaet {0, 1} that ends in the letter (digit) 0. From Lemmas 17 and 18 and (6), we find that there exists some λ {0, 1,..., y} such that A. a r i = 1 and a r i 1 = 0 for all i {0, 1,..., λ 1}. B. a r λ = 0. C. a r λ i+1 = 1 and a r λ i = 0 for all i {1,,..., r/ λ}. That is, This means that w = v = This leads us to the following. { (10) λ 0(10) r/ λ 0, if r; (10) λ 0(10) r/ λ, if r. { 10 k r 1 (10) λ 0(10) r/ λ 0, if r; 10 k r 1 (10) λ 0(10) r/ λ, if r. (9) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 19
20 Definition 19. Let k, r, x e nonnegative integers such that x < r < k 1. Define the word w(k, r, x) y { 10 k r 1 (10) x 0(10) r/ x 0, if r; w(k, r, x) = 10 k r 1 (10) x 0(10) r/ x, if r, and let γ(k, r, x) e the positive integer whose ordinary ase expansion is w(k, r, x). Definition 0. For any integers k, r, x, define V (k, r, x) = 1 ((k r)(l r+ L r 4x+1 ) + L r+1 + L r 4x+ ). Lemma 1. Let k, r, x, y e nonnegative integers such that x y < r < k 1. We have γ(k, r, x) + 1 I(k, r, y) and s (γ(k, r, x) + 1) = V (k, r, x). Proof. The ordinary ase expansion of k + y r i is 10 k r 1 (10) y+1 0 r y 1, so one may see from Definition 19 and the hypothesis that x y that γ(k, r, x)+1 k + y r i. It should also e clear from Definition 19 that k < γ(k, r, x)+1, so γ(k, r, x)+1 I(k, r, y). If we choose to write γ(k, r, x) = for nonnegative integers e 0, e 1,..., e l with e 0 < e 1 < e l, then and e 0 = {, if r; 1, if r, e j = e 0 + j for all j {1,,..., t}, e t+j = r x + j = e 0 + t + j + 1 for all j {1,,..., x}, e l = k, where t = r/ x 1. Oserve that the letter (digit) 1 appears exactly r/ + 1 times in the word w(k, r, x), so it follows from (6) that l = r/ (implying that t + 1 = l x). Let us first assume x = 0. Setting d j = e j e j 1 1 for all j {1,,..., l}, we have { 1, if j {1,,..., l 1}; d j = k r, if j = l. We may invoke Theorem 1 to see that s (γ(k, r, 0) + 1) = Tr(N e0 M d1 M d M dl ) = Tr(N e0 M l 1 1 M k r ). (10) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 0
21 Let T = If r, we may use Lemma 16 to find that Similarly, if r, then F r F r 1 F r F r F r 1 F r N e0 M l 1 1 = N 1 M 1 (r ) 1 = T. N e0 M l 1 1 = N M 1 (r 3) 1 = T. Therefore, regardless of the parity of r, we have s (γ(k, r, 0) + 1) = Tr(T M k r ) y (10). Thus, s (γ(k, r, 0) + 1) = Tr(T M k r ) = (k r)f r+1 + F r+, where the last equality is otained y simply calculating the matrix T M k r y hand. One may easily show that F r+1 = 1 (L r+ L r+1 ) and F r+ = 1 (L r+1 + L r+ ), so s (γ(k, r, 0) + 1) = 1 ((k r)(l r+ L r+1 ) + L r+1 + L r+ ) = V (k, r, 0). Let us now assume x > 0. Again, we set d j = e j e j 1 1 for all j {1,,..., l}, and we see that 1, if j {1,,..., l 1} \ {t + 1}; d j =, if j = t + 1; k r 1, if j = l. By Theorem 1, s (γ(k, r, x) + 1) = Tr(N e0 M d1 M d M dl ) = Tr(N e0 M t 1M M l 1 (t+1) 1 M k r 1 ) = Tr(N e0 M t 1M M x 1 1 M k r 1 ). If r, then Lemma 16 allows us to find that Similarly, if r, then N e0 M t 1 = N 1 M r/ x 1 1 = N e0 M t 1 = N M (r 1)/ x 1 1 = F r x F r x 1 F r x F r x F r x 1 F r x F r x F r x 1 F r x F r x F r x 1 F r x the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 1
22 Therefore, no matter the parity of r, we have N e0 M t 1M M x 1 1 M k r 1 = F r x F r x 1 F r x F r x F r x 1 F r x Using Lemma 16 again, we find that F r x F r x 1 F r x F r x F r x 1 F r x M M1 x 1 M k r 1 = where and Therefore, M M x 1 1 M k r 1. χ 1 χ χ 1 χ 1 χ χ χ 1 = (k r)(f r x+3 F x + F r x+1 F x 1 ) F r x+3 F x F r x+1 F x 3 χ = F r x+3 F x + F r x+1 F x 1. s (γ(k, r, x) + 1) = Tr(N e0 M t 1M M x 1 1 M k r 1 ) = χ 1 + χ = (k r)(f r x+3 F x + F r x+1 F x 1 ) + F r x+3 F x 1 + F r x+1 F x. We now make use of the wellknown identity to otain F m F n = 1 (L m+n ( 1) n L m n ) F r x+3 F x + F r x+1 F x 1 = 1 (L r+3 L r 4x+3 + L r + L r 4x+ ), = 1 (L r+ + L r+1 + L r L r 4x+1 ) = 1 (L r+ L r 4x+1 ) and F r x+3 F x 1 + F r x+1 F x = 1 (L r+ + L r 4x+4 + L r 1 L r 4x+3 ) Consequently, s (γ(k, r, x) + 1) = (k r) = 1 (L r+1 + L r + L r 1 + L r 4x+ ) = 1 (L r+1 + L r 4x+ ). ( ) 1 (L r+ L r 4x+1 ) + 1 (L r+1 + L r 4x+ ) = V (k, r, x). Before proceeding to our main result, we need one final easy lemma. Lemma. For any integers k, r, x, V (k, r, x + 1) V (k, r, x) = 1 ((k r)(l r 4x+1 L r 4x 3 ) + L r 4x L r 4x+ ). the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8
23 Proof. Referring to Definition 0, we have V (k, r, x + 1) = A + 1 ((k r)( L r 4(x+1)+1) + L r 4(x+1)+ ) and V (k, r, x) = A + 1 ((k r)( L r 4x+1) + L r 4x+ ), where A = 1 ((k r)(l r+) + L r+1 ). Thus, V (k, r, x + 1) V (k, r, x) = 1 ((k r)(l r 4x+1 L r 4x 3 ) + L r 4x L r 4x+ ). We are finally in a position to prove our main result. Theorem 3. Let k, r, y e nonnegatve integers such that y < r < k 1. If r is even, then ν(k, r, y) = γ(k, r, y) + 1 and µ(k, r, y) = V (k, r, y). If k = r 3 (mod 4) and y r + 1 4, then Otherwise, ν(k, r, y) = γ(k, r, (r 3)/4) + 1 and µ(k, r, y) = V (k, r, (r 3)/4). ν(k, r, y) = γ(k, r, δ(r, y)) + 1 and µ(k, r, y) = V (k, r, δ(r, y)), where δ(r, y) = min { } r 1 4, y. Proof. We saw in the discussion immediately preceding Definition 19 that ν(k, r, y) = γ(k, r, λ) + 1 for some λ {0, 1,..., y}; we simply need to determine the value of λ. By Definition 8, λ is the element of {0, 1,..., y} such that s (γ(k, r, λ) + 1) is maximized and γ(k, r, λ) + 1 I(k, r, y). Lemma 1 tells us that γ(k, r, x) + 1 I(k, r, y) and s (γ(k, r, x) + 1) = V (k, r, x) for all x {0, 1,..., y}, so µ(k, r, y) = max{v (k, r, x): x {0, 1,..., y}}. That is, λ must e the element of the set {0, 1,..., y} that maximizes V (k, r, λ) (if there are multiple such elements, we choose the smallest in accordance with the definition of ν(k, r, y) in Definition 8). We first assume r is even. We wish to show that λ = y. This is immediate if y = 0, so we will assume y > 0. Choose some x {0, 1,..., y 1}. We make use of an easilyproven fact aout Lucas numers that states that if m, n are odd integers (not necessarily positive) with m < n, then L m < L n. In this case, we use the assumption that r is even to see that r 4x 3 and r 4x + 1 are odd integers with r 4x 3 < r 4x + 1. Therefore, L r 4x+1 L r 4x 3 > 0. Because k r y hypothesis, we may use Lemma to find that V (k, r, x + 1) V (k, r, x) 1 ((L r 4x+1 L r 4x 3 ) + L r 4x L r 4x+ ) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 3
24 = 1 (L r 4x 1 L r 4x ). As r 4x and r 4x 1 are odd integers with r 4x < r 4x 1, we see that Because x was aritrary, this shows that so λ = y. V (k, r, x + 1) V (k, r, x) > 0. V (k, r, 0) < V (k, r, 1) < < V (k, r, y), We now assume r is odd. Let x 1, x e integers such that x 1 r 4 < r 1 4 x. We will make use of the fact that L m = L m for any even integer m. Because x 1 r 4, we otain the inequalities r 4x 1 +1 > r 4x 1 3 > 0. Therefore, L r 4x1 +1 L r 4x1 3 > 0. Because k r, we see from Lemma that V (k, r, x 1 + 1) V (k, r, x 1 ) 1 ((L r 4x 1 +1 L r 4x1 3) + L r 4x1 L r 4x1 +) = 1 (L r 4x 1 1 L r 4x1 ). We know that L r 4x1 1 L r 4x1 > 0 ecause r 4x 1 0. Thus, V (k, r, x 1 + 1) > V (k, r, x 1 ). (11) If y < r 1 r 4, then every element of the set {0, 1,..., y 1} is less than, so (11) 4 shows that This shows that if y < r 1 4, then V (k, r, 0) < V (k, r, 1) < < V (k, r, y). λ = y = δ(r, y), which agrees with the statement of the theorem. Therefore, we will henceforth assume that y r 1 4 so that δ(r, y) = r 1 4. It follows from the inequality x r 1 that 4 4x r + 3 > 4x r 1. If 4x r 1 0, then If 4x r 1 =, then L 4x r 1 L 4x r+3 < 0. L 4x r 1 L 4x r+3 = L L = 0. Hence, L 4x r 1 L 4x r+3 0. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 4
25 Because r 4x + 1 and r 4x 3 are even, L r 4x +1 L r 4x 3 = L 4x r 1 L 4x r+3 0. Using Lemma and the fact that k r, we have V (k, r, x + 1) V (k, r, x ) 1 ((L r 4x +1 L r 4x 3) + L r 4x L r 4x +) = 1 (L r 4x 1 L r 4x ). Because 4x r + > 4x r and r 4x 1, r 4x are even, we have This shows that L r 4x 1 L r 4x = L 4x r+1 L 4x r+ < 0. V (k, r, x + 1) < V (k, r, x ). (1) We now have three short cases to consider. In the first case, assume r 1 (mod 4). We have shown through (11) and (1) that and V (k, r, m) > V (k, r, m 1) > V (k, r, m ) > V (k, r, m) > V (k, r, m + 1) > V (k, r, m + ) >, where m = r 1 r 1. This implies that 4 4 is the unique value of x that maximizes r 1, so {0, 1,..., y}. Conse 4 V (k, r, x). Recall that we have assumed that y r 1 4 quently, λ = r 1 = δ(r, y). 4 For the second case, we suppose that r 3 (mod 4) and r < k. We need to show that λ = δ(r, y). We may use (11) and (1) to see that and where n = r 3. By Lemma, 4 V (k, r, n) > V (k, r, n 1) > V (k, r, n ) > V (k, r, n + 1) > V (k, r, n + ) > V (k, r, n + 3) >, V (k, r, n + 1) V (k, r, n) = 1 ((k r)(l 4 L 0 ) + L 1 L ) = 1 ((k r)(7 ) ) = k r > 0, the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8
26 so V (k, r, n) < V (k, r, n + 1). This shows that n + 1 = r+1 is the unique value of x 4 that maximizes V (k, r, x). Because y r 1 4 = r+1 r+1, it follows that {0, 1,..., y}. 4 4 Therefore, λ = r+1 = r = δ(r, y). For the third and final case, we assume k = r 3 (mod 4). We wish to show that λ = r 3. Using (11) and (1), we otain 4 and V (k, r, n) > V (k, r, n 1) > V (k, r, n ) > V (k, r, n + 1) > V (k, r, n + ) > V (k, r, n + 3) >, where n = r 3. Lemma tells us that 4 V (k, r, n + 1) V (k, r, n) = 1 ((k r)(l 4 L 0 ) + L 1 L ) = 1 ((k r)(7 ) ) = k r = 0, so V (k, r, n) = V (k, r, n + 1). Therefore, V (k, r, x) otains its maximum when x = n and when x = n+1. This means that µ(k, r, y) = V (k, r, n). Either ν(k, r, y) = γ(k, r, n)+1 or γ(k, r, n+1)+1. Note that γ(k, r, n)+1 < γ(k, r, n+1)+1 y Definition 19. Since ν(k, r, y) is defined to e the smallest element of I(k, r, y) such that s (ν(k, r, y) + 1) = µ(k, r, y), it follows that ν(k, r, y) = γ(k, r, n) + 1. That is, λ = n = r 3 4. We end this section with a definition and a theorem that will prove useful in the next section. Definition 4. For any integers k and m with m k, let G k (m) = k + h m and H k (m) = F m+ + (k m)f m. Although it is possile to give an easy inductive proof of the following theorem using the simple Fionaccilike recurrence we prefer a proof ased on Theorem 1. H k (m) = H k 1 (m 1) + H k (m ), (13) Theorem. For any integers k and m with m k, we have s (G k (m)) = H k (m). Proof. Referring to Definition 3, we see that we may write G k (m) 1 = k + m 3 m i =, the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 6
27 where e 0 = m m 3 {, if m; = 1, if m, l = m 1, el = k, and e j = e 0 + j for all j {0, 1,..., l 1}. For example, G 1 (7) 1 = i = Defining d i as in Theorem 1, we have d j = 1 for all j {1,,..., l 1} and d l = e l e l 1 1 = k (e 0 + (l 1)) 1 = k (( m ) ( m 3 + m 1 )) 1 1 = k m + 1. By Theorem 1, s (G k (m)) = Tr(N e0 M1 l 1 M k m+1 ). Using Lemma 16, one may show that ρ 1 ρ ρ 1 N e0 M1 l 1 M k m+1 = ρ 1 ρ ρ 1, where Therefore, ρ 1 = (k m 1)(e 0 F l + F l 1 ) + e 0 F l+ + F l+1 and ρ = e 0 F l + F l 1. s (G k (m)) = ρ 1 + ρ = (k m)(e 0 F l + F l 1 ) + e 0 F l+ + F l+1. If m is even, then e 0 = and l = m, so s (G k (m)) = (k m)(f m + F m 3 ) + F m + F m 1 = (k m)f m + F m+ = H k (m). If m is odd, then e 0 = 1 and l = m 1, so s (G k (m)) = (k m)(f m 1 + F m ) + F m+1 + F m = (k m)f m + F m+ = H k (m). 3 More Manageale Bounds In the previous section, we derived fairly strong upper ounds (relative to those previously known) for the values of s (n) for those integers n satisfying k n k + h k for some integer k 3. Unfortunately, these ounds are somewhat cumersome. In this section, we will weaken them in order to make them cleaner and more easily applicale. Suppose k, m, and n are integers such that m < k and G k (m) < n < G k (m + 1). We wish to use Theorem 3 to show that the point (n, s (n)) lies elow the line segment connecting the points (G k (m), H k (m)) and (G k (m + 1), H k (m + 1)). This leads us to the following definition. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 7
28 Definition 6. For any integers k and m with m < k, define a function J k,m : R R y J k,m (x) = H k(m + 1) H k (m) G k (m + 1) G k (m) (x G k(m)) + H k (m). The graph of J k,m (x) is the line passing through (G k (m), H k (m)) and (G k (m + 1), H k (m + 1)). Our aim is to show that s (n) < J k,m (n) for all n {G k (m) + 1,..., G k (m + 1) 1}. Oserve that we may rewrite J k,m (x) as J k,m (x) = F m 1(k m) (x G k (m)) + H k (m) h m+1 h m ecause H k (m+1) H k (m) = (k m 1)F m+1 +F m+3 (k m)f m F m+ = F m 1 (k m) and G k (m + 1) G k (m) = h m+1 h m. Lemma 7. If m and x are positive integers with m 4 and x < G m 1 (m 3), then s (x) F m. Proof. Let m and x e as in the statement of the lemma. If x < m 1, then it follows from Proposition 6 that s (x) F m. If x = m 1, then s (x) = 1 < F m y Lemma. Therefore, we will assume m 1 < x. Note that the inequalities m 1 < x < G m 1 (m 3) force m 6. Since m 1 < x G m 1 (m 3) 1 = m 1 + m 6 m i, it follows from Definition 8 that x I ( m 1, m, ) m 6. Referring to Definition 8 again, we find that s (x) µ ( m 1, m, ) m 6. Therefore, we simply need to show that µ ( m 1, m, ) m 6 Fm. (14) Suppose m is odd. It follows from Theorem 3 and Definition 0 that µ ( m 1, m, ) ( ) ( ) m 6 = µ m 1, m, m 7 = V m 1, m, m 7 = 1 (4(L m 3 L 10 m ) + L m 4 + L 11 m ). Because m is odd, L 10 m = L m 10 and L 11 m = L m 11. Therefore, For any integer t, let µ ( m 1, m, ) m 6 1 = (4(L m 3 + L m 10 ) + L m 4 + L m 11 ). η t = 1 (4(L t 3 + L t 10 ) + L t 4 + L t 11 ) and κ t = 11F t. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 8
29 It is easy to see that the recurrence relations η t+4 = 3η t+ η t and κ t+4 = 3κ t+ κ t hold for all integers t. In addition, one may verify that κ = η = 0 and κ 7 = η 7 = 11. This implies that κ t = η t for all odd integers t. In particular, µ ( m 1, m, m 6 ) = ηm = κ m = 11F m < F m, where the inequality 11F m < F m is easilyproven for all odd m > 6 (for example, y showing that 11F m = F m F m 8 < 1F m F m 8 = F m ). This proves (14) when m is odd. Next, assume m is even. By Theorem 3, where µ ( m 1, m, m 6 δ ( m, m 6 If m 0 (mod 4), then m 6 4 = m 4, so 4 µ ( m 1, m, m 6 ) = V ( m 1, m, δ ( m, m 6 ) { = min (m ) 1 4, m 6 } = m 6 4. )), ) ( ) = V m 1, m, m = (4(L m 3 L 0 ) + L m 4 + L 1 ) = 1 (8L m 3 + L m 4 7) < 1 (8L m 3 + L m 4 ). Similarly, if m (mod 4), then m 6 4 = m 6, so 4 µ ( m 1, m, m 6 ) ( ) = V m 1, m, m = (4(L m 3 L ) + L m 4 + L 3 ) = 1 (8L m 3 + L m 4 8) < 1 (8L m 3 + L m 4 ). In either case, we may use the identity F u = 1 (L u+1 + L u 1 ) to see that µ ( m 1, m, ) m 6 1 < (8L m 3 +L m 4 ) = 1 (6L m 3 +L m ) = 1 (4L m 3 +L m 1 ) = 1 (L m 3 + L m 1 ) + 1 (L m 3 + L m 4 + L m ) = F m + 1 (L m + L m ) < F m + 1 (L m + L m 4 ) = F m + F m 3 = F m. This proves (14) in the case when m is even, so the proof is complete. Throughout the proofs of the following three lemmas, we assume =. For example, since G k (4) = k + h 4 = k + + 1, it will e understood that G k (4) = k +. Lemma 8. For any positive integers t and x with t log x +, we have s ( t + x) s (x)(t + 1 log x ). the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 9
30 Proof. The proof is y induction on t. The inequality t log x + forces t. If t =, then the inequality t log x + forces x = 1 so that s ( t + x) = s () = 3 = s (1)( + 1 log 1 ) = s (x)(t + 1 log x ). Now, suppose t 3. If x is even, then it follows from (1) and induction on t that s ( t + x) = s ( t 1 + x/) s (x/)((t 1) + 1 log (x/) ) = s (x)(t + 1 log x ). Therefore, we may assume x is odd. By induction on t, we have and s ( t 1 + (x 1)/) s ((x 1)/)((t 1) + 1 log ((x 1)/) ) = s ((x 1)/)(t + 1 log x ) s ( t 1 + (x + 1)/) s ((x + 1)/)((t 1) + 1 log ((x + 1)/) ) Therefore, it follows from (1) that s ((x + 1)/)(t + 1 log x ). s ( t + x) = s ( t 1 + (x 1)/ ) + s ( t 1 + (x + 1)/ ) (s ((x 1)/) + s ((x + 1)/)) (t + 1 log x ) = s (x)(t + 1 log x ). Lemma 9. If k, m, and n are integers such that 4 m < k and then s (n) < H k (m). k + m 1 n < k + G m 1 (m 3), Proof. Let k, m, and n e as stated in the lemma. Let x = n k, and note that log x = m 1. We may comine Lemmas 7 and 8 to get s (n) = s ( k + x) s (x)(k + 1 log x ) = s (x)(k m + ) F m (k m + ) < F m (k m) + F m+ = H k (m). Lemma 30. If k, m, and n are integers such that m {, 7}, m < k, and n = k + G m 1 (m 3), then s (n) < J k,m (n). Proof. The proof is very straightforward. We make use of the fact that s (17) = and s (69) = 14. Suppose m =. Then k 6 and n = k + G 4 () = k h = k + 17 y hypothesis. Using Lemma 8 and the remark following Definition 6, we have s (n) = s ( k + 17) s (17)(k + 1 log 17 ) = (k 3) < 34 (k ) + 13 = 3(k ) 1 11 ((k + 17) ( k + 11)) (k ) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 30
31 = F 4(k ) (n G k ()) + F 7 + F (k ) = J k, (n). h 6 h Next, suppose m = 7. Then k 8 and n = k + G 6 (4) = k = k Using Lemma 8 and the paragraph following Definition 6 once again yields s (n) = s ( k + 69) s (69)(k + 1 log 69 ) = 14(k ) < 104 (k 7) (k 7) 1 8(k 7) = 8 43 ((k + 69) ( k + 43)) (k 7) = F 6(k 7) (n G k (7)) + F 9 + F 7 (k 7) = J k,7 (n). h 8 h 7 We now return to our ase assumption that may represent any integer larger than 1. Lemma 31. Let m and y e integers such that m 4 and 1 y m. We have L m 4y 1 L m and L m 4y L m 6. Proof. First, suppose m is even. We use the fact that L u < L v for any odd integers u, v with u < v to see that the maximum possile value of L m 4y 1 is otained when y = 1. That is, L m 4y 1 L m. It is easy to see that L u for all even integers u, so L m 4y > L m 6. Next, suppose m is odd. We use the fact that L u = L u < L v = L v for any nonnegative even integers u, v with u < v to find that the ilateral sequence..., L 4, L, L 0, L, L 4,... is strictly convex. Therefore, the maximum possile value of L m 4y 1 occurs when y = 1 or when y = m = m 3. Because L m 4(1) 1 = L m = L m = L m 4((m 3)/) 1, the maximum possile value of L m 4y 1 is L m. As L u < L v for any odd integers u, v with u < v, the smallest possile value of L m 4y occurs when y = m 3. That is, L m 4y L m 4((m 3)/) = L 6 m. Now, L u = L u for all odd integers u, so L m 4y L 6 m = L m 6. Lemma 3. If m and y are integers such that m 4 and 1 y m, then L m + L m 4y >. F m 1 Furthermore, if m 4 and m {, 7}, then L m + L m 4 F m Proof. We will use the closedform expressions F n = φn φ n and L n = φ n + φ n for the Fionacci and Lucas numers. We also make use of the fact that L u for any even integer u. For any integer j, we have L m j F m 1 1 φ j 1 = φ m j m j + φ (φ m 1 φ m 1) 1 φ j 1 = 1 φ (φ m j j 1 + φ j 1) ( φ j 1 φ m 1 φ m 1) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 31
32 = 1 φ m j Lj 1 φ j 1 φ m 1 φ m 1 = L j 1 φ m j = ( 1) m j L j 1, φ j 1 F m 1 φ m 1 F m 1 where the last equality follows from the identity φ = 1 φ. Therefore, L m j F m 1 = L j 1 1 φ j 1 + ( 1)m j. (1) φ m 1 F m 1 If m is even, then we may set j = in (1) and invoke the inequality L m 4y (since m 4y is even) to find that L m + L m 4y F m 1 L m + F m 1 > L m F m 1 = 1 φ + ( 1)m L 1 φ m 1 F m 1 = 1 φ + 1 > 1 φ m 1 F m 1 φ >. Let us now suppose m is odd. By Lemma 31, L m + L m 4y F m 1 L m L m 6 F m 1 Using (1), once with j = 3 and once with j =, yields = L m 3 + L m F m 1. L m 3 + L m F m 1 = 1 φ + ( 1)m 3 L φ m 1 F m φ 4 + ( 1)m L 4 φ m 1 F m 1 > 1 φ + 1 φ 4 = ecause ( 1) m 3 L and ( 1) m L 4 are positive. This completes the φ m 1 F m 1 φ m 1 F m 1 proof of the first inequality in the statement of the lemma. Assume, now, that m 4 and m {, 7}. We may use (1), once with j = and again with j = 4, to see that L m + L m 4 F m 1 = 1 φ + ( 1)m L 1 φ m 1 F m φ 3 + ( 1)m 4 L 3 φ m 1 F m 1 = 1 φ + 1 φ 3 + ( 1)m (L 1 + L 3 ) = 1 φ m 1 F m 1 φ + 1 φ 3 + ( 1)m. φ m 1 F m 1 For m 4 and m {, 7}, it is easy to see that ( 1) m φ m 1 F m 1 attains its minimum when m = 9. Thus, L m + L m 4 1 F m 1 φ + 1 φ 3 + ( 1)9 = 8 φ 8 F 8 1, where this last equality is easily verified. Alternatively, we could have proven the second inequality stated in the lemma using the fact that L m + L m 4 F m 1 = F m 3 F m 1. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 3
33 Lemma 33. Let k and m e integers such that k and m k 1. Define a function Θ k,m : R R y Θ k,m (x) = J k,m( k + x) ( k + x) log φ. For any x 0, d dx Θ k,m( k + x) 0. Proof. We egin with the easilyproven fact that F m F m 1 3 this, we have for all integers m 4. From H k (m) (k m)f m 1 = (k m)f m + F m+ (k m)f m 1 (k m)f m + (k m)f m+ (k m)f m 1 = F m + F m+ F m 1 One may easily show that = 4F m 1 + 3F m F m log φ 6 log φ = F m F m 1 6. for any choice of an integer (if 3, this follows from the oservation that > 6 log φ). In addition, using Definition 3 and Lemma 4, we have h m m and Therefore, h m+1 h m m m + m = m 1. k + h m log φ k + m log φ = m 1 ( k m log φ) m 1 ( + 1 log φ) 6 m 1 log φ 6(h m+1 h m ) log φ Let T k (m) = (k m)f m 1 h m+1 h m x 0. We have H k (m) (k m)f m 1 (h m+1 h m ) log φ. so that we otain k +h m log φ H k(m) T k (m) log φ. Choose some xt k (m)(1 log φ) 0 T k (m) [ ] Hk (m) T k (m) log φ h m log φ k = [H k (m) T k (m)h m ] log φ k T k (m). Adding xt k (m) log φ + k T k (m) to each side of this last inequality yields which we may rewrite as ( k + x)t k (m) log φ (xt k (m) + [H k (m) T k (m)h m ]), ( k + x)t k (m) log φ [H k (m) + T k (m)(x h m )] 0. (16) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 33
34 Now, referring to the paragraph immediately following Definition 6, we see that J k,m ( k +x) = T k (m)(x h m )+H k (m). Therefore, (16) ecomes ( k +x)t k (m) J k,m ( k + d x) log φ 0. In addition, dx J k,m( k + x) = T k (m). Consequently, d J k,m ( k + x) dx ( k + x) = (k + x) log φ T k (m) J k,m ( k + x) log φ( k + x) log φ 1 log φ ( k + x) log φ = (k + x)t k (m) J k,m ( k + x) log φ ( k + x) log φ+1 0. We are finally ready to prove the main results of this section. Theorem 34. If k, m, and n are integers such that m < k and G k (m) < n < G k (m + 1), then s (n) < J k,m (n). Proof. By Definition 3 and Definition 4, n G k (m + 1) 1 = k + m m 1 i. Therefore, we may let y e the smallest element of the set { 0, 1,..., } m such that y n k + m 1 i. Referring to Definition 8, we find that s (n) µ(k, m 1, y) ecause n I(k, m 1, y). Hence, it suffices to prove that µ(k, m 1, y) < J k,m (n). (17) It follows from Theorem 3, Definition 0, Definition 4, and the identity F u = 1 (L u+1 + L u 1 ) that µ(k, m 1, 0) = V (k, m 1, 0) = 1 ((k m + 1)(L m+1 L m ) + L m + L m+1 ) ( ) 1 = (k m) (L m+1 L m ) + 1 (L m+ + L m 1 ) ( ) 1 = (k m) (L m+1 + L m 1 ) + 1 (L m+3 + L m+1 ) = (k m)f m + F m+ = H k (m). This shows that if y = 0, then s (n) µ(k, m 1, 0) = H k (m) = J k,m (G k (m)) < J k,m (n), the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 34
35 where we have used the trivial fact that J k,m is an increasing function. Therefore, we may y 1 assume y > 0. Because of the way we chose y, this means that n > k + m 1 i k + m 1. Note that this also forces m 4 ecause y m. By a similar token, it follows from Lemma 9 that s (n) = s (n) H k (m) = J k,m (G k (m)) < J k,m (n) if = and n < k + G m 1 (m 3). Therefore, we may assume n k + G m 1 (m 3) if =. If =, m {, 7}, and n = k + G m 1 (m 3), then the desired result is simply Lemma 30. This means that if = and m {, 7}, then we may assume n k + G m 1 (m 3) + 1. We have two cases to consider. Case 1: In this case, assume that µ(k, m 1, y) = V (k, m 1, y). Recall Definition 0 to see that V (k, m 1, y) = 1 ((k m + 1)(L m+1 L m 4y ) + L m + L m 4y+1 ) = 1 ((k m)(l m+1 L m 4y ) + L m+ + L m 4y 1 ). We now use the fact that L m 4y 1 < L m 1 (which follows immediately from Lemma 31) as well as the identity 1 (L u+1 + L u 1 ) = F u to see that V (k, m 1, y) < 1 ((k m)(l m+1 L m 4y ) + L m+ + L m 1 ) = 1 (k m)(l m+1 L m 4y ) + 1 (L m+3 + L m+1 ) = 1 (k m)(l m+1 L m 4y ) + F m+. Because we simply need to show that J k,m (n) = F m 1(k m) h m+1 h m (n G k (m)) + H k (m) = F m 1(k m) h m+1 h m ( n k h m ) + Fm (k m) + F m+, 1 (k m)(l m+1 L m 4y ) F m 1(k m) ( ) n k h m + Fm (k m) h m+1 h m in order to otain (17). After dividing each side y k m and using the identity 1 (L m+1 L m 4y ) = F m+1 1 (L m + L m 4y ), we find that this last inequality ecomes F m+1 1 ( (L m + L m 4y ) F m 1 1 h ) m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m + F m, the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 3
36 which we may rewrite as h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m L m + L m 4y F m 1 (18) after sutracting F m+1 from each side and then rearranging terms. We will prove (18) in each of the following two sucases. Sucase 1: In this sucase, assume = and y = 1. Recall that we mentioned at the eginning of the proof that we may assume n k + G m 1 (m 3) when =. Furthermore, we may assume n k + G m 1 (m 3) + 1 if m {, 7}. If m =, then If m = 7, then h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m h m+1 (G m 1 (m 3) + 1) h m+1 h m = h 6 (G 4 () + 1) h 6 h = ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) = 3 10 < 1 3 = L 3 + L 1 F 4 = L m + L m 4y F m 1. h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m h m+1 (G m 1 (m 3) + 1) h m+1 h m = h 8 (G 6 (4) + 1) h 8 h 7 = ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) = 14 < 3 8 = L + L 3 F 6 = L m + L m 4y F m 1. This proves (18) if m {, 7}, so we will assume m {, 7}. By Definition 3, h m+1 = 1 + = 1 + m 1 + m 3 + m m 6 m 1 i = 1 + m 1 + m 3 + m m 1 i m i = m 3 + m 1 + h m 3 = m 3 + G m 1 (m 3). Therefore, using Lemma 4 to write h m+1 h m = m + ( 1) m, we have 3 h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m h m+1 G m 1 (m 3) h m+1 h m = If m is even, then m 3 i= m 3 = 3 h m+1 h m m + ( 1) m. If m is odd, then m 9, so h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m 3 m 3 m + < 3m 3 m = 3 8 < 8 1. h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m 3 m 3 m = = 4 m < 8 1. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 36
37 Either way, h m+1 (n k ) < 8 h m+1 h m 1. Lemma 3 tells us that 8 1 L m + L m 4, so we F m 1 otain (18). Sucase : In this sucase, suppose either y > 1 or. It follows from our choice of y y 1 that n > k + m 1 i. Using Definition 3 and Lemma 4, we see that h m+1 (n k ) = 1 + m m 1 i (n k ) < 1 + m 1 i (n k ) and Therefore, < 1 + y 1 m 1 i m 1 i = 1 + i=y h m+1 h m m + 1. m 1 i = 1 + m+1 y 1 h m+1 (n k ) < 1 + m+1 y /( 1) h m+1 h m ( m )/( + 1) = + m+1 y 1 ( m )( 1). (19) If we treat m as a continuous real variale, then ( ) + m+1 y 1 = 1 ( ) + m+1 y 1 m ( m )( 1) 1 m m = 1 ( m ) m+1 y log ( + m+1 y 1) m log 1 ( m ) = This shows that + m+1 y 1 ( m )( 1) log ( 1)( m ) ( m+ y m+ + m ) < 0. is decreasing in m. Suppose y. This forces m 6 ecause y m decreasing in m, we see from (19) that. Because + m+1 y 1 ( m )( 1) is h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m < + m+1 y 1 ( m )( 1) + 7 y 1 ( 6 )( 1) ( 6 )( 1). If =, then h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m < ( 6 )( 1) = 11 6 <. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 37
38 If 3, then h m+1 (n k ) < h m+1 h m ( 6 )( 1) < ( 6 )( 1) = ( 1)( 1) No matter the value of, we find from Lemma 3 that = 1 ( 1) 1 3 (3 1) = 1 36 <. h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m < < L m + L m 4y F m 1, which is (18). We have proven (18) when y, so assume y = 1. We assumed either y > 1 or, so we must have 3. Since + m+1 y 1 is decreasing in m and m 4, it follows ( m )( 1) from (19) that If = 3, then h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m < + m+1 y 1 ( m )( 1) + y 1 ( 4 )( 1) = ( 4 )( 1). h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m < ( 4 )( 1) = 3 16 <, which proves (18) with the help of Lemma 3. If 4, then h m+1 (n k ) h m+1 h m < ( 4 )( 1) < ( 4 )( 1) = ( 3 1)( 1) = 1 ( 1) 1 (4 1) = 1 9 <, which proves (18) once again. Case : Here, assume µ(k, m 1, y) V (k, m 1, y). Referring to Theorem 3, we see that ν(k, m 1, y) = γ(k, m 1, x)+1 and µ(k, m 1, y) = V (k, m 1, x) for some x < y. x 1 One finds from Definition 19 that γ(k, m 1, x) + 1 > k + m 1 i. By Lemma 1, γ(k, m 1, x) + 1 I(k, m 1, x). In other words, if we let y e the smallest element of the set { 0, 1,..., y } m such that γ(k, m 1, x) + 1 k + m 1 i, then y = x. By definition, µ(k, m 1, x) is the maximum value of s (j) as j ranges over all elements of I(k, m 1, x). Because γ(k, m 1, x) + 1 I(k, m 1, x), this means that µ(k, m 1, x) s (γ(k, m 1, x) + 1) = s (ν(k, m 1, y)) = µ(k, m 1, y), the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 38
39 where we have used Definition 8 to deduce the last equality. Similarly, µ(k, m 1, y) is the maximum value of s (j) as j ranges over all elements of I(k, m 1, y). Since x < y, I(k, m 1, x) I(k, m 1, y). Therefore, µ(k, m 1, x) µ(k, m 1, y). This shows that µ(k, m 1, x) = µ(k, m 1, y) = V (k, m 1, x). ( ] x 1 x Now, choose some integer n k + m 1 i, k + m 1 i (note that γ(k, m 1, x) + 1 is in this interval). { 0, 1,..., m } satisfying n k + Because x is the smallest element of the set x m 1 i and µ(k, m 1, x) = V (k, m 1, x), it follows from Case 1 that s (n ) < J k,m (n ). We may set n = γ(k, m 1, x) + 1, so s (γ(k, m 1, x) + 1) < J k,m (γ(k, m 1, x) + 1). Using the fact that γ(k, m 1, x) + 1 y 1 x k + m 1 i k + m 1 i < n, we have µ(k, m 1, y) = s (γ(k, m 1, x) + 1) < J k,m (γ(k, m 1, x) + 1) < J k,m (n). This proves (17) and completes the proof of the theorem. Corollary 3. We have Proof. Corollary 7 states that lim sup n lim sup n s (n) n log φ = ( 1) log φ. s (n) n log φ ( 1) log φ, so we will now prove the reverse inequality. For each integer k 3, let u k = G k (k) = k + h k. Let θ(x) = log (x) 1 for each x > 0. Recall that we showed in the proof of Corollary 7 that We will show that s (u k ) lim k u log φ k It will then follow from (0) and (1) that lim sup n s (n) lim sup n log φ n = ( 1) log φ. (0) s (n) n s (u θ(n) ) for all n >. (1) log φ (u θ(n) ) log φ s (u θ(n) ) (u θ(n) ) log φ = lim sup k s (u k ) u log φ k = ( 1) log φ, which will complete the proof. In order to derive (1), let us choose some integer n >. Let θ = θ(n), and note that θ < n θ+1. It follows from Proposition 6 that s (n) F θ+ = s ( θ + h θ ) = s (u θ ) the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 39
40 (if n = θ+1, then Proposition 6 does not apply, ut the inequality still holds ecause s (n) = 1 < F θ+ ). If n u θ, then this shows that s (n) n s (u θ ) log φ n s (u θ ) log φ u log φ θ which is the inequality we seek to prove. Therefore, we will assume n < u θ. For any t {, 3,..., θ 1}, we may use Lemma 33 to see that Θ θ,t (G θ (t)) = Θ θ,t ( θ + h t ) Θ θ,t ( θ + h t+1 ) = Θ θ,t (G θ (t + 1)), where we have preserved the notation from that lemma. Furthermore, with the help of Definition 6, we find that Θ θ,t (G θ (t+1)) = J θ,t(g θ (t + 1)) G θ (t + 1) = H θ(t + 1) log φ G θ (t + 1) = J θ,t+1(g θ (t + 1)) log φ G θ (t + 1) log φ for all t {, 3,..., θ 1}. Therefore, for all t {, 3,..., θ 1}. That is, Θ θ,t (G θ (t)) Θ θ,t+1 (G θ (t + 1)), = Θ θ,t+1 (G θ (t+1)) () Θ θ, (G θ ()) Θ θ,3 (G θ (3)) Θ θ,θ (G θ (θ)). (3) Because θ < n < u θ = G θ (θ), there exists some m {, 3,..., θ 1} such that G θ (m) n < G θ (m + 1). In other words, we may write n = θ + x for some x {h m, h m + 1,..., h m+1 1}. By Lemma 33 and (), Θ θ,m (n) = Θ θ,m ( θ + x) Θ θ,m ( θ + h m+1 ) = Θ θ,m (G θ (m + 1)) = Θ θ,m+1 (G θ (m + 1)). It follows from (3) that Θ θ,m+1 (G θ (m + 1)) Θ θ,θ (G θ (θ)), so Θ θ,m (n) Θ θ,θ (G θ (θ)). (4) If n = G θ (m), then it follows easily from Theorem and Definition 6, that s (n) = s (G θ (m)) = H θ (m) = J θ,t (G θ (m)) = J θ,m (n). If n G θ (m), then G θ (m) < n < G θ (m + 1), so Theorem 34 shows that s (n) < J θ,m (n). Either way, s (n) J θ,m (n). Hence, using (4), we otain s (n) n J θ,m(n) log φ n log φ = Θ θ,m(n) Θ θ,θ (G θ (θ)) = J θ,θ(g θ (θ)) G θ (θ) log φ = s (G θ (θ)) G θ (θ) = s (u θ ), log φ u log φ θ which proves (1). the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 40
41 Theorem 36. For any real x 0 and any integer k 3, let β(x) = log (( 1)x + 1) and f k (x) = 1 [ (k β(x))(φ β(x) + φ β(x) ) + φ β(x)+ + φ β(x) ]. If k and n are positive integers such that k 3 and k < n k + h k, then s (n) < f k (n k ). Proof. Let k 3 e an integer. Let α = k + 1, and note that h k α. We 1 will show that f k is increasing and concave down on the open interval (1, α). The desired inequality will then follow quite easily. Oserve that we may write f k (x) = g k (β(x)), where g k (x) = 1 [ (k x)(φ x + φ x ) + φ x+ + φ x ]. If x log ( k + ), then ( k x k log ( k + ) = log ) k 1 1 k 1 log 1 log 1 4 log, where we have used the inequality log (1 + u) u that holds for all u > 1 (as well log as the inequalities k 3 and ). Therefore, if x log ( k + ), then where and g k(x) = 1 [ (k x)(φ x φ x ) log φ (φ x + φ x ) + (φ x+ φ x ) log φ ] 1 [ 1 ] 4 log (φx φ x ) log φ (φ x + φ x ) + (φ x+ φ x ) log φ ) ( )] + φ x = 1 [ φ x ( φ log φ log φ 4 log 1 = 1 [ C1 φ x + C φ x], C 1 = φ log φ log φ 4 log φ log φ + log φ 4 log 1 C = φ log φ + log φ 4 log If x, then C 1 φ x C 1 φ and C φ x C φ. This means that g k(x) 1 [ C1 φ x + C φ x] C 1 φ + C φ > 0 the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 41
42 whenever x log ( k + ). Now, if 1 x α, then β(x) log ( k + ) and β (x) > 0. Consequently, f k(x) = d dx g k(β(x)) = g k(β(x))β (x) > 0 for all x [1, α]. This shows that f k is increasing on the open interval (1, α). We now wish to show that f k is concave down on the interval (1, α). We first calculate and to otain β (x) = 1 1 log ( 1)x + 1 β (x) = 1 ( ) 1 = (β (x)) log log ( 1)x + 1 f k (x) = d d x g k(β(x)) = d dx (g k(β(x))β (x)) = g k(β(x))β (x) + (β (x)) g k(β(x)) = (β (x)) (g k(β(x)) g k(β(x)) log ). Therefore, to show that f k is concave down on the interval (1, α), we just need to show that g k (β(x)) log > g k (β(x)) for all x (1, α). To do so, it suffices to show that log log φ g k(x) > log φ g k(x) () for all x (, log ( k + )). Suppose x (, log ( k + )). We have so (φ x + φ x ) + (φ x+ φ x ) log φ = φ x (φ log φ 1) φ x (φ log φ + 1) φ (φ log φ 1) φ x (φ log φ + 1) φ (φ log φ 1) φ (φ log φ + 1) > 0, g k(x) = 1 [ (k x)(φ x φ x ) log φ (φ x + φ x ) + (φ x+ φ x ) log φ ] In other words, Using the inequality log (1 + u) > 1 [ (k x)(φ x φ x ) log φ ]. log log φ g k(x) > (k x)(φ x φ x ) log. (6) u, which holds for all u > 1, we find that log ) k x > k log ( k + ) = log ( k 1 1 k 1 log, the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 4
43 so it follows from the assumption that k 3 that In addition, since x >, k x > 1 log. (7) φ x (log log φ) φ x (log + log φ) > φ (log log φ) φ (log + log φ) > 0. (8) Comining (6), (7), and (8) with the fact that log φ g k(x) = log φ [(k x)(φ x + φ x ) φx φ x log φ yields log log φ g k(x) log φ g k(x) > ] + (φ x+ + φ x ) (k x)(φ x φ x ) log (k x)(φ x + φ x ) log φ + (φ x φ x ) (φ x+ + φ x ) log φ = (k x)(φ x (log log φ) φ x (log + log φ)) + φ x ( φ log φ) φ x ( + φ log φ) > 1 log (φx (log log φ) φ x (log + log φ)) + φ x ( φ log φ) φ x ( + φ log φ) = A 1 φ x A φ x, where A 1 = φ log φ 1 (log log φ) log and A = + φ log φ 1 (log + log φ). log Because, it is easy to see that A 1 > φ log φ 1 φ log φ 1 4 > 0.49 and A < + φ log φ <.19. Since x >, log log φ g k(x) log φ g k(x) > A 1 φ x A φ x > 0.49φ x.19φ x > 0.49φ.19φ > 0, which proves (). We have shown that f k is increasing and concave down on the interval (1, α). Now, suppose m is odd and 3 m k. Because m is odd, one may easily show that h m = 1 + m 3 m i = m + 1. Since 1 G k (m) k = h m = m > m 1 1, the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 43
44 we may use the fact that f k is increasing on (1, α) to see that ( ) ( ( )) f k (G k (m) k m 1 m 1 ) > f k = g k β = g 1 k (m) 1 = 1 [ (k m)(φ m + φ m ) + φ m+ + φ m ] = (k m) φm ( 1/φ) m + φm+ ( 1/φ) m+ Similarly, if m is even and m k, then f k (G k (m) k ) = f k (h m ) = f k ( m 1 1 = (k m)f m + F m+ = H k (m). ) = g k ( β = 1 [ (k m)(φ m + φ m ) + φ m+ + φ m ] > 1 [ (k m)(φ m φ m ) + φ m+ φ m ] = (k m) φm ( 1/φ) m + φm+ ( 1/φ) m+ ( )) m 1 = g k (m) 1 = (k m)f m + F m+ = H k (m). Hence, f k (G k (m) k ) > H k (m) for all m {, 3,..., k}. We may now prove that s (n) < f k (n k ) for all n { k + 1, k +,..., k + h k }. Choose such an integer n. If n = G k (m) for some m {, 3,..., k}, then it follows from Theorem and the preceding discussion that s (n) = H k (m) < f k (n k ). Therefore, we will assume n G k (m) for all m {, 3,..., k}. Note that there exists some m {, 3,..., k 1} such that G k (m) < n < G k (m + 1). Let C e the curve {(x, f k (x k )): G k (m) x G k (m + 1)}, and let L = {J k,m (x): G k (m) x G k (m + 1)} e the line segment connecting the points (G k (m), H k (m)) and (G k (m+1), H k (m+1)). Because f k (x) is concave down on the interval (1, α), the curve C is concave down. Since f k (G k (m) k ) > H k (m) and f k (G k (m + 1) k ) > H k (m + 1), the curve C must lie aove the line segment L. In particular, J k,m (n) < f k (n k ). By Theorem 34, s (n) < J k,m (n) < f k (n k ), as desired. 4 Concluding Remarks We wish to acknowledge some of the potential uses and extensions of results derived in this paper. First, we note that Theorem 1 allows us to derive explicit formulas for the values of s (n) for integers n whose ordinary ase expansions have certain forms. For example, we were ale to invoke Theorem 1 in the proof of Theorem in order to show the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 44
45 Figure : Two plots of s (n) for 1 n 10. The top plot uses the value =, while the ottom uses = 3. For each k {3, 4,..., 9}, the graph of f k (x k ) for k x k + h k is shown in green. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 4
46 Figure 3: A plot of s 3 (n) for 3 9 n h 9 (where h 9 is defined with = 3). The graph of f k (x 3 9 ) is colored green. The upper ound from Theorem 34 is the polygonal path colored purple. The points (G 9 (m), H 9 (m)) for m {, 3,..., 9} are colored lue. that s (G k (m)) = H k (m). As another example, it is possile to use Theorem 1 to show that s (1 + x 1 + x 1+x + x 1+x +x 3 ) = x 1 x x 3 + x 1 x + x 1 x 3 + x x 3 + x 1 (9) for any positive integers x 1, x, x 3. The equation (9) appears with several similar identities (many of which can e deduced from Theorem 1) in [3]. Second, arguments ased on symmetry and periodicity may e used to extend the upper ounds given y Theorems 3, 34, and 36. For example, referring to the top image in Figure, one will see that the plot of s (n) forms several mound shapes. However, only the left sides of the mounds are ounded aove y the green curves. It is known [, page ] that if k N, then s ( k + x) = s ( k+1 x) for all x {1,,..., k }. (30) This allows us to otain upper ounds over the right sides of the mounds for free. More precisely, since we know from Theorem 36 that s ( k +x) < f k (x) for all x {1,,..., h k }, it follows from (30) that s ( k+1 x) < f k (x) for all such x. Using identities similar to (30) for aritrary values of, one may extend our upper ounds for s (n) to a larger range of values of n. the electronic journal of cominatorics 3(4) (016), #P4.8 46
Determinants of generalized binary band matrices
Determinants of generalized inary and matrices Dmitry Efimov arxiv:17005655v1 [mathra] 18 Fe 017 Department of Mathematics, Komi Science Centre UrD RAS, Syktyvkar, Russia Astract Under inary matrices we
More informationGeneralized Geometric Series, The Ratio Comparison Test and Raabe s Test
Generalized Geometric Series The Ratio Comparison Test and Raae s Test William M. Faucette Decemer 2003 The goal of this paper is to examine the convergence of a type of infinite series in which the summands
More informationPostorder Preimages. arxiv: v3 [math.co] 2 Feb Colin Defant 1. 1 Introduction
Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science DMTCS vol. 19:1, 2017, #3 Postorder Preimages arxiv:1604.01723v3 [math.co] 2 Feb 2017 1 University of Florida Colin Defant 1 received 7 th Apr. 2016,
More informationContinuity. Chapter 4
Chapter 4 Continuity Throughout this chapter D is a nonempty subset of the real numbers. We recall the definition of a function. Definition 4.1. A function from D into R, denoted f : D R, is a subset of
More informationSummation Formulas. Math Review. Let N > 0, let A, B, and C be constants, and let f and g be any functions. Then: S1: factor out constant
Computer Science Dept Va Tech August 005 005 McQuain WD Summation Formulas Let > 0, let A, B, and C e constants, and let f and g e any functions. Then: f C Cf ) ) S: factor out constant g f g f ) ) ))
More informationLaver Tables A Direct Approach
Laver Tables A Direct Approach Aurel Tell Adler June 6, 016 Contents 1 Introduction 3 Introduction to Laver Tables 4.1 Basic Definitions............................... 4. Simple Facts.................................
More informationADVANCED CALCULUS  MTH433 LECTURE 4  FINITE AND INFINITE SETS
ADVANCED CALCULUS  MTH433 LECTURE 4  FINITE AND INFINITE SETS 1. Cardinal number of a set The cardinal number (or simply cardinal) of a set is a generalization of the concept of the number of elements
More informationBoolean InnerProduct Spaces and Boolean Matrices
Boolean InnerProduct Spaces and Boolean Matrices Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver CO 80208 Frédéric Latrémolière Department of Mathematics, University of Denver, Denver
More informationDefinitions, Theorems and Exercises. Abstract Algebra Math 332. Ethan D. Bloch
Definitions, Theorems and Exercises Abstract Algebra Math 332 Ethan D. Bloch December 26, 2013 ii Contents 1 Binary Operations 3 1.1 Binary Operations............................... 4 1.2 Isomorphic Binary
More informationMATH 2200 Final Review
MATH 00 Final Review Thomas Goller December 7, 01 1 Exam Format The final exam will consist of 810 proofs It will take place on Tuesday, December 11, from 10:30 AM  1:30 PM, in the usual room Topics
More informationLogarithms. For example:
Math Review Summation Formulas Let >, let A, B, and C e constants, and let f and g e any functions. Then: f C Cf ) ) S: factor out constant ± ± g f g f ) ) )) ) S: separate summed terms C C ) 6 ) ) Computer
More informationMulticoloring and Mycielski s construction
Multicoloring and Mycielski s construction Tim Meagher Fall 2010 Abstract We consider a number of related results taken from two papers one by W. Lin [1], and the other D. C. Fisher[2]. These articles
More informationMatching Polynomials of Graphs
Spectral Graph Theory Lecture 25 Matching Polynomials of Graphs Daniel A Spielman December 7, 2015 Disclaimer These notes are not necessarily an accurate representation of what happened in class The notes
More informationCHAPTER 5. Linear Operators, Span, Linear Independence, Basis Sets, and Dimension
A SERIES OF CLASS NOTES TO INTRODUCE LINEAR AND NONLINEAR PROBLEMS TO ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS, AND APPLIED MATHEMATICIANS LINEAR CLASS NOTES: A COLLECTION OF HANDOUTS FOR REVIEW AND PREVIEW OF LINEAR THEORY
More informationkprotected VERTICES IN BINARY SEARCH TREES
kprotected VERTICES IN BINARY SEARCH TREES MIKLÓS BÓNA Abstract. We show that for every k, the probability that a randomly selected vertex of a random binary search tree on n nodes is at distance k from
More informationStandard forms for writing numbers
Standard forms for writing numbers In order to relate the abstract mathematical descriptions of familiar number systems to the everyday descriptions of numbers by decimal expansions and similar means,
More informationNOTE. A Note on Fisher's Inequality
journal of cominatorial theory, Series A 77, 171176 (1997) article no. TA962729 NOTE A Note on Fisher's Inequality Douglas R. Woodall Department of Mathematics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7
More informationReversal of regular languages and state complexity
Reversal of regular languages and state complexity Juraj Šeej Institute of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, P. J. Šafárik University Jesenná 5, 04001 Košice, Slovakia juraj.seej@gmail.com Astract.
More informationParity Versions of 2Connectedness
Parity Versions of 2Connectedness C. Little Institute of Fundamental Sciences Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand c.little@massey.ac.nz A. Vince Department of Mathematics University of Florida
More informationFAREYPELL SEQUENCE, APPROXIMATION TO IRRATIONALS AND HURWITZ S INEQUALITY (COMMUNICATED BY TOUFIK MANSOUR)
Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis Applications ISSN: 89 URL: http://wwwmathaag Volume 8 Issue (06) Pages  FAREYPELL SEQUENCE APPROXIMATION TO IRRATIONALS AND HURWITZ S INEQUALITY (COMMUNICATED BY TOUFIK
More informationYOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP
YOUNG TABLEAUX AND THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE SYMMETRIC GROUP YUFEI ZHAO ABSTRACT We explore an intimate connection between Young tableaux and representations of the symmetric group We describe the construction
More informationLecture 1 & 2: Integer and Modular Arithmetic
CS681: Computational Numer Theory and Algera (Fall 009) Lecture 1 & : Integer and Modular Arithmetic July 30, 009 Lecturer: Manindra Agrawal Scrie: Purushottam Kar 1 Integer Arithmetic Efficient recipes
More informationSums of Squares. Bianca Homberg and Minna Liu
Sums of Squares Bianca Homberg and Minna Liu June 24, 2010 Abstract For our exploration topic, we researched the sums of squares. Certain properties of numbers that can be written as the sum of two squares
More informationQuivers. Virginia, Lonardo, Tiago and Eloy UNICAMP. 28 July 2006
Quivers Virginia, Lonardo, Tiago and Eloy UNICAMP 28 July 2006 1 Introduction This is our project Throughout this paper, k will indicate an algeraically closed field of characteristic 0 2 Quivers 21 asic
More informationFRAMES, GRAPHS AND ERASURES
FRAMES, GRAPHS AND ERASURES BERNHARD G. BODMANN AND VERN I. PAULSEN Abstract. Twouniform frames and their use for the coding of vectors are the main subject of this paper. These frames are known to be
More informationSome notes on Coxeter groups
Some notes on Coxeter groups Brooks Roberts November 28, 2017 CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 Sources 2 2 Reflections 3 3 The orthogonal group 7 4 Finite subgroups in two dimensions 9 5 Finite subgroups in three
More informationEXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF INFINITE COMPONENTS IN GENERIC RIGIDITY PERCOLATION 1. By Alexander E. Holroyd University of Cambridge
The Annals of Applied Probability 1998, Vol. 8, No. 3, 944 973 EXISTENCE AND UNIQUENESS OF INFINITE COMPONENTS IN GENERIC RIGIDITY PERCOLATION 1 By Alexander E. Holroyd University of Cambridge We consider
More informationThe Advantage Testing Foundation Olympiad Solutions
The Advantage Testing Foundation 015 Olympiad Problem 1 Prove that every positive integer has a unique representation in the form d i i, where k is a nonnegative integer and each d i is either 1 or. (This
More informationInfinite constructions in set theory
VI : Infinite constructions in set theory In elementary accounts of set theory, examples of finite collections of objects receive a great deal of attention for several reasons. For example, they provide
More informationchapter 5 INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX ALGEBRA GOALS 5.1 Basic Definitions
chapter 5 INTRODUCTION TO MATRIX ALGEBRA GOALS The purpose of this chapter is to introduce you to matrix algebra, which has many applications. You are already familiar with several algebras: elementary
More informationUndergraduate Notes in Mathematics. Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics
Undergraduate Notes in Mathematics Arkansas Tech University Department of Mathematics An Introductory Single Variable Real Analysis: A Learning Approach through Problem Solving Marcel B. Finan c All Rights
More informationIMVI ISSN (p) , ISSN Open Mathematical Education Notes Vol. 3 (2013), / JOURNALS / IMVI OMEN
IMVI ISSN (p) 23034882 ISSN 18404383 Open Mathematical Education Notes Vol. 3 (2013) 1729 www.imvil.org / JOURNALS / IMVI OMEN FROM PASCAL S TRIANGLE TO A MATHEMATICAL FRONTIER: UNCOVERING HIDDEN PATTERNS
More informationLebesgueRadonNikodym Theorem
LebesgueRadonNikodym Theorem Matt Rosenzweig 1 LebesgueRadonNikodym Theorem In what follows, (, A) will denote a measurable space. We begin with a review of signed measures. 1.1 Signed Measures Definition
More informationThe Number of NonZero (mod k) Dominating Sets of Some Graphs
The Number of NonZero (mod k) Dominating Sets of Some Graphs Cheryl Jerozal The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, 16802 Email: pseudorandomcheryl@psu.edu William F. Klostermeyer Dept.
More informationOn nonhamiltonian circulant digraphs of outdegree three
On nonhamiltonian circulant digraphs of outdegree three Stephen C. Locke DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES, FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, BOCA RATON, FL 33431 Dave Witte DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS, OKLAHOMA
More information1 Systems of Differential Equations
March, 20 7 Systems of Differential Equations Let U e an open suset of R n, I e an open interval in R and : I R n R n e a function from I R n to R n The equation ẋ = ft, x is called a first order ordinary
More informationOn Aperiodic Subtraction Games with Bounded Nim Sequence
On Aperiodic Subtraction Games with Bounded Nim Sequence Nathan Fox arxiv:1407.2823v1 [math.co] 10 Jul 2014 Abstract Subtraction games are a class of impartial combinatorial games whose positions correspond
More informationUMA Putnam Talk LINEAR ALGEBRA TRICKS FOR THE PUTNAM
UMA Putnam Talk LINEAR ALGEBRA TRICKS FOR THE PUTNAM YUFEI ZHAO In this talk, I want give some examples to show you some linear algebra tricks for the Putnam. Many of you probably did math contests in
More informationCONSTRUCTION OF sequence of rational approximations to sets of rational approximating sequences, all with the same tail behaviour Deﬁnition 1.
CONSTRUCTION OF R 1. MOTIVATION We are used to thinking of real numbers as successive approximations. For example, we write π = 3.14159... to mean that π is a real number which, accurate to 5 decimal places,
More informationINTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYSIS II MATH 4332 BLECHER NOTES
INTRODUCTION TO REAL ANALYSIS II MATH 4332 BLECHER NOTES You will be expected to reread and digest these typed notes after class, line by line, trying to follow why the line is true, for example how it
More informationGeneralized ReedSolomon Codes
Chapter 5 Generalized ReedSolomon Codes In 1960, I.S. Reed and G. Solomon introduced a family of errorcorrecting codes that are douly lessed. The codes and their generalizations are useful in practice,
More informationSTRONG NORMALITY AND GENERALIZED COPELAND ERDŐS NUMBERS
#A INTEGERS 6 (206) STRONG NORMALITY AND GENERALIZED COPELAND ERDŐS NUMBERS Elliot Catt School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
More informationCHARACTERISTICS OF COUNTER EXAMPLE LOOPS IN THE COLLATZ CONJECTURE. Thomas W. Allen II
CHARACTERISTICS OF COUNTER EXAMPLE LOOPS IN THE COLLATZ CONJECTURE by Thomas W Allen II An Abstract presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department
More informationThe rank of connection matrices and the dimension of graph algebras
The rank of connection matrices and the dimension of graph algebras László Lovász Microsoft Research One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 August 2004 Microsoft Research Technical Report TR200482 Contents
More informationDivideandConquer. Reading: CLRS Sections 2.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 28.2, CSE 6331 Algorithms Steve Lai
DivideandConquer Reading: CLRS Sections 2.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 28.2, 33.4. CSE 6331 Algorithms Steve Lai Divide and Conquer Given an instance x of a prolem, the method works as follows: divideandconquer
More informationPARTITIONS OF FINITE VECTOR SPACES INTO SUBSPACES
PARTITIONS OF FINITE VECTOR SPACES INTO SUBSPACES S.I. ELZANATI, G.F. SEELINGER, P.A. SISSOKHO, L.E. SPENCE, AND C. VANDEN EYNDEN Abstract. Let V n (q) denote a vector space of dimension n over the field
More information3 The language of proof
3 The language of proof After working through this section, you should be able to: (a) understand what is asserted by various types of mathematical statements, in particular implications and equivalences;
More informationThe MatrixTree Theorem
The MatrixTree Theorem Christopher Eur March 22, 2015 Abstract: We give a brief introduction to graph theory in light of linear algebra. Our results culminates in the proof of MatrixTree Theorem. 1 Preliminaries
More informationSEQUENCES, MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, AND RECURSION
CHAPTER 5 SEQUENCES, MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, AND RECURSION Copyright Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. SECTION 5.4 Strong Mathematical Induction and the WellOrdering Principle for the Integers Copyright
More informationOn Projective Planes
CUPPSATS 2002:02 TFM, Mid Sweden University 851 70 Sundsvall Tel: 06014 86 00 On Projective Planes 1 2 7 4 3 6 5 The Fano plane, the smallest projective plane. By Johan Kåhrström ii iii Abstract It was
More informationOn the adjacency matrix of a block graph
On the adjacency matrix of a block graph R. B. Bapat StatMath Unit Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi 7SJSS Marg, New Delhi 110 016, India. email: rbb@isid.ac.in Souvik Roy Economics and Planning Unit
More informationINFINITY: CARDINAL NUMBERS
INFINITY: CARDINAL NUMBERS BJORN POONEN 1 Some terminology of set theory N := {0, 1, 2, 3, } Z := {, 2, 1, 0, 1, 2, } Q := the set of rational numbers R := the set of real numbers C := the set of complex
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 3 Nov 2014
SPARSE MATRICES DESCRIBING ITERATIONS OF INTEGERVALUED FUNCTIONS BERND C. KELLNER arxiv:1411.0590v1 [math.co] 3 Nov 014 Abstract. We consider iterations of integervalued functions φ, which have no fixed
More informationMAT 3271: Selected solutions to problem set 7
MT 3271: Selected solutions to problem set 7 Chapter 3, Exercises: 16. Consider the Real ffine Plane (that is what the text means by the usual Euclidean model ), which is a model of incidence geometry.
More informationArticle 12 INTEGERS 11A (2011) Proceedings of Integers Conference 2009 RECURSIVELY SELFCONJUGATE PARTITIONS
Article 12 INTEGERS 11A (2011) Proceedings of Integers Conference 2009 RECURSIVELY SELFCONJUGATE PARTITIONS William J. Keith Department of Mathematics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA wjk26@math.drexel.edu
More informationParity Dominating Sets in Grid Graphs
Parity Dominating Sets in Grid Graphs John L. Goldwasser and William F. Klostermeyer Dept. of Mathematics West Virginia University Morgantown, WV 26506 Dept. of Computer and Information Sciences University
More informationEdge colored complete bipartite graphs with trivial automorphism groups
Edge colored complete bipartite graphs with trivial automorphism groups Michael J. Fisher Garth Isaak Abstract We determine the values of s and t for which there is a coloring of the edges of the complete
More informationPRIME LABELING OF SMALL TREES WITH GAUSSIAN INTEGERS. 1. Introduction
PRIME LABELING OF SMALL TREES WITH GAUSSIAN INTEGERS HUNTER LEHMANN AND ANDREW PARK Abstract. A graph on n vertices is said to admit a prime labeling if we can label its vertices with the first n natural
More informationThe Integers. Math 3040: Spring Contents 1. The Basic Construction 1 2. Adding integers 4 3. Ordering integers Multiplying integers 12
Math 3040: Spring 2011 The Integers Contents 1. The Basic Construction 1 2. Adding integers 4 3. Ordering integers 11 4. Multiplying integers 12 Before we begin the mathematics of this section, it is worth
More informationSection 8.5. z(t) = be ix(t). (8.5.1) Figure A pendulum. ż = ibẋe ix (8.5.2) (8.5.3) = ( bẋ 2 cos(x) bẍ sin(x)) + i( bẋ 2 sin(x) + bẍ cos(x)).
Difference Equations to Differential Equations Section 8.5 Applications: Pendulums MassSpring Systems In this section we will investigate two applications of our work in Section 8.4. First, we will consider
More informationIntroduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #5 09/19/2013
18.782 Introduction to Arithmetic Geometry Fall 2013 Lecture #5 09/19/2013 5.1 The field of padic numbers Definition 5.1. The field of padic numbers Q p is the fraction field of Z p. As a fraction field,
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 27 Aug 2015
Ppositions in Modular Extensions to Nim arxiv:1508.07054v1 [math.co] 7 Aug 015 Tanya Khovanova August 31, 015 Abstract Karan Sarkar In this paper, we consider a modular extension to the game of Nim, which
More informationCHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM
CHAPTER I THE RIESZ REPRESENTATION THEOREM We begin our study by identifying certain special kinds of linear functionals on certain special vector spaces of functions. We describe these linear functionals
More informationQuivers of Period 2. Mariya Sardarli Max Wimberley Heyi Zhu. November 26, 2014
Quivers of Period 2 Mariya Sardarli Max Wimberley Heyi Zhu ovember 26, 2014 Abstract A quiver with vertices labeled from 1,..., n is said to have period 2 if the quiver obtained by mutating at 1 and then
More informationCONSECUTIVE INTEGERS IN HIGHMULTIPLICITY SUMSETS
CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS IN HIGHMULTIPLICITY SUMSETS VSEVOLOD F. LEV Abstract. Sharpening (a particular case of) a result of Szemerédi and Vu [4] and extending earlier results of Sárközy [3] and ourselves
More informationarxiv: v1 [quantph] 11 Mar 2016
The Asymptotics of Quantum MaxFlow MinCut Matthew B. Hastings 1 Station Q, Microsoft Research, Santa Barbara, CA 931066105, USA 2 Quantum Architectures and Computation Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond,
More informationWeak bidders prefer firstprice (sealedbid) auctions. (This holds both exante, and once the bidders have learned their types)
Econ 805 Advanced Micro Theory I Dan Quint Fall 2007 Lecture 9 Oct 4 2007 Last week, we egan relaxing the assumptions of the symmetric independent private values model. We examined privatevalue auctions
More informationSequences. Chapter 3. n + 1 3n + 2 sin n n. 3. lim (ln(n + 1) ln n) 1. lim. 2. lim. 4. lim (1 + n)1/n. Answers: 1. 1/3; 2. 0; 3. 0; 4. 1.
Chapter 3 Sequences Both the main elements of calculus (differentiation and integration) require the notion of a limit. Sequences will play a central role when we work with limits. Definition 3.. A Sequence
More informationMinimal multipliers for consecutive Fibonacci numbers
ACTA ARITHMETICA LXXV3 (1996) Minimal multipliers for consecutive Fibonacci numbers by K R Matthews (Brisbane) 1 Introduction The Fibonacci and Lucas numbers F n, L n (see [2]) are defined by Since F 1
More informationCHAPTER II THE HAHNBANACH EXTENSION THEOREMS AND EXISTENCE OF LINEAR FUNCTIONALS
CHAPTER II THE HAHNBANACH EXTENSION THEOREMS AND EXISTENCE OF LINEAR FUNCTIONALS In this chapter we deal with the problem of extending a linear functional on a subspace Y to a linear functional on the
More informationSpragueGrundy Values of the RWythoff Game
SpragueGrundy Values of the RWythoff Game Albert Gu Department of Mathematics Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A agu@andrew.cmu.edu Submitted: Aug 6, 2014; Accepted: Apr 10, 2015;
More informationPUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS. Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include
PUTNAM TRAINING POLYNOMIALS (Last updated: December 11, 2017) Remark. This is a list of exercises on polynomials. Miguel A. Lerma Exercises 1. Find a polynomial with integral coefficients whose zeros include
More informationNets and filters (are better than sequences)
Nets and filters (are better than sequences) Contents 1 Motivation 2 2 More implications we wish would reverse 2 3 Nets 4 4 Subnets 6 5 Filters 9 6 The connection between nets and filters 12 7 The payoff
More informationEfficient packing of unit squares in a square
Loughborough University Institutional Repository Efficient packing of unit squares in a square This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an author. Additional
More informationRobot Position from Wheel Odometry
Root Position from Wheel Odometry Christopher Marshall 26 Fe 2008 Astract This document develops equations of motion for root position as a function of the distance traveled y each wheel as a function
More informationCOUNTABLE COMPACTNESS, HEREDITARY π CHARACTER, AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS
COUNTABLE COMPACTNESS, HEREDITARY π CHARACTER, AND THE CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS TODD EISWORTH Abstract. We prove that the Continuum Hypothesis is consistent with the statement that countably compact regular
More informationBasic counting techniques. Periklis A. Papakonstantinou Rutgers Business School
Basic counting techniques Periklis A. Papakonstantinou Rutgers Business School i LECTURE NOTES IN Elementary counting methods Periklis A. Papakonstantinou MSIS, Rutgers Business School ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
More informationPRIMES Math Problem Set
PRIMES Math Problem Set PRIMES 017 Due December 1, 01 Dear PRIMES applicant: This is the PRIMES 017 Math Problem Set. Please send us your solutions as part of your PRIMES application by December 1, 01.
More informationAN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE SPECTRAL RADIUS FORMULA FOR MATRICES
AN ELEMENTARY PROOF OF THE SPECTRAL RADIUS FORMULA FOR MATRICES JOEL A. TROPP Abstract. We present an elementary proof that the spectral radius of a matrix A may be obtained using the formula ρ(a) lim
More informationUpper triangular matrices and Billiard Arrays
Linear Algebra and its Applications 493 (2016) 508 536 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Linear Algebra and its Applications www.elsevier.com/locate/laa Upper triangular matrices and Billiard Arrays
More informationA Short Review of Cardinality
Christopher Heil A Short Review of Cardinality November 14, 2017 c 2017 Christopher Heil Chapter 1 Cardinality We will give a short review of the definition of cardinality and prove some facts about the
More informationBinomial coefficient codes over W2)
Discrete Mathematics 106/107 (1992) 181188 NorthHolland 181 Binomial coefficient codes over W2) Persi Diaconis Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Ron Graham AT & T Bell Laboratories, Murray
More informationHomework 7 Solutions to Selected Problems
Homework 7 Solutions to Selected Prolems May 9, 01 1 Chapter 16, Prolem 17 Let D e an integral domain and f(x) = a n x n +... + a 0 and g(x) = m x m +... + 0 e polynomials with coecients in D, where a
More informationGraph Coloring Inequalities from Alldifferent Systems
Constraints manuscript No (will be inserted by the editor) Graph Coloring Inequalities from Alldifferent Systems David Bergman J N Hooker Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract We explore the idea of
More informationRigid Divisibility Sequences Generated by Polynomial Iteration
Rigid Divisibility Sequences Generated by Polynomial Iteration Brian Rice Nicholas Pippenger, Advisor Christopher Towse, Reader May, 2008 Department of Mathematics Copyright c 2008 Brian Rice. The author
More informationarxiv: v2 [cs.dm] 29 Mar 2013
arxiv:1302.6346v2 [cs.dm] 29 Mar 2013 Fixed point theorems for Boolean networks expressed in terms of forbidden subnetworks Adrien Richard Laboratoire I3S, CNRS & Université de NiceSophia Antipolis, France.
More informationComputing the rank of configurations on Complete Graphs
Computing the rank of configurations on Complete Graphs Robert Cori November 2016 The paper by M. Baker and S. Norine [1] in 2007 introduced a new parameter in Graph Theory it was called the rank of configurations
More informationANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 2017: SOLUTIONS. 1 cos(nx) lim. n 2 x 2. g n (x) = 1 cos(nx) n 2 x 2. x 2.
ANALYSIS QUALIFYING EXAM FALL 27: SOLUTIONS Problem. Determine, with justification, the it cos(nx) n 2 x 2 dx. Solution. For an integer n >, define g n : (, ) R by Also define g : (, ) R by g(x) = g n
More informationCullen Numbers in Binary Recurrent Sequences
Cullen Numbers in Binary Recurrent Sequences Florian Luca 1 and Pantelimon Stănică 2 1 IMATEUNAM, Ap. Postal 613 (Xangari), CP 58 089 Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico; email: fluca@matmor.unam.mx 2 Auburn
More informationCOS597D: Information Theory in Computer Science October 19, Lecture 10
COS597D: Information Theory in Computer Science October 9, 20 Lecture 0 Lecturer: Mark Braverman Scribe: Andrej Risteski Kolmogorov Complexity In the previous lectures, we became acquainted with the concept
More informationAn Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees
An Algebraic View of the Relation between Largest Common Subtrees and Smallest Common Supertrees Francesc Rosselló 1, Gabriel Valiente 2 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Research Institute
More informationThe GaussJordan Elimination Algorithm
The GaussJordan Elimination Algorithm Solving Systems of Real Linear Equations A. Havens Department of Mathematics University of Massachusetts, Amherst January 24, 2018 Outline 1 Definitions Echelon Forms
More informationThe Real Number System
MATH 337 The Real Number System Sets of Numbers Dr. Neal, WKU A set S is a welldefined collection of objects, with welldefined meaning that there is a specific description from which we can tell precisely
More informationDiscrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 2014 Anant Sahai Note 3
EECS 70 Discrete Mathematics and Probability Theory Spring 014 Anant Sahai Note 3 Induction Induction is an extremely powerful tool in mathematics. It is a way of proving propositions that hold for all
More informationMeasure and integration
Chapter 5 Measure and integration In calculus you have learned how to calculate the size of different kinds of sets: the length of a curve, the area of a region or a surface, the volume or mass of a solid.
More informationSupplementary Notes for W. Rudin: Principles of Mathematical Analysis
Supplementary Notes for W. Rudin: Principles of Mathematical Analysis SIGURDUR HELGASON In 8.00B it is customary to cover Chapters 7 in Rudin s book. Experience shows that this requires careful planning
More informationarxiv: v1 [math.co] 13 Dec 2014
SEARCHING FOR KNIGHTS AND SPIES: A MAJORITY/MINORITY GAME MARK WILDON arxiv:1412.4247v1 [math.co] 13 Dec 2014 Abstract. There are n people, each of whom is either a knight or a spy. It is known that at
More informationMATH 6102: PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR FINAL EXAM
MATH 6102: PRACTICE PROBLEMS FOR FINAL EXAM (FP1) The exclusive or operation, denoted by and sometimes known as XOR, is defined so that P Q is true iff P is true or Q is true, but not both. Prove (through
More informationNormal Fans of Polyhedral Convex Sets
SetValued Analysis manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Normal Fans of Polyhedral Convex Sets Structures and Connections Shu Lu Stephen M. Robinson Received: date / Accepted: date Dedicated
More information