DATE: 9/ L I S R E L 8.80

Similar documents
The Role of Leader Motivating Language in Employee Absenteeism (Mayfield: 2009)

The use of structural equation modeling to examine consumption of pornographic materials in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong

SC705: Advanced Statistics Instructor: Natasha Sarkisian Class notes: Model Building Strategies

THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL WITH LATENT VARIATES

C:\Users\Rex Kline\AppData\Local\Temp\AmosTemp\AmosScratch.amw. Date: Friday, December 5, 2014 Time: 11:20:30 AM

CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS

THE GENERAL STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL WITH LATENT VARIATES

EVALUATION OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS

SEM Day 3 Lab Exercises SPIDA 2007 Dave Flora

Evaluation of structural equation models. Hans Baumgartner Penn State University

RESMA course Introduction to LISREL. Harry Ganzeboom RESMA Data Analysis & Report #4 February

Instrumental variables regression on the Poverty data

SAS Example 3: Deliberately create numerical problems

Regression without measurement error using proc calis

SEM Day 1 Lab Exercises SPIDA 2007 Dave Flora

Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Psych 818 DeShon

Psychology 454: Latent Variable Modeling How do you know if a model works?

* IVEware Analysis Examples Replication for ASDA 2nd Edition * Berglund April 2017 * Chapter 13 ;

Introduction to Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Lecture notes I: Measurement invariance 1

Multi-group analyses for measurement invariance parameter estimates and model fit (ML)

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO MISSISSAUGA April 2009 Examinations STA431H5S Professor Jerry Brunner Duration: 3 hours

Evaluating the Sensitivity of Goodness-of-Fit Indices to Data Perturbation: An Integrated MC-SGR Approach

Structural Equation Modeling Lab 5 In Class Modification Indices Example

Using Structural Equation Modeling to Conduct Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Factor analysis. George Balabanis

sempower Manual Morten Moshagen

Appendix A (Note: this material is to be place on web, not intended for print version)

Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variables

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Preface. List of examples

This course. Tutors. Jon Heron, PhD (Bristol) Anna Brown, PhD (Cambridge)

A Threshold-Free Approach to the Study of the Structure of Binary Data

Multi-sample structural equation models with mean structures, with special emphasis on assessing measurement invariance in cross-national research

Pelatihan Statistika. Jonathan Sarwono

Psychology 454: Latent Variable Modeling How do you know if a model works?

A Cautionary Note on the Use of LISREL s Automatic Start Values in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Studies R. L. Brown University of Wisconsin

A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Factor Analysis in Examining the Effect of a Calculator Accommodation on Math Performance

Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Types of Variables

Chapter 13 Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling

Related Concepts: Lecture 9 SEM, Statistical Modeling, AI, and Data Mining. I. Terminology of SEM

The comparison of estimation methods on the parameter estimates and fit indices in SEM model under 7-point Likert scale

2/26/2017. PSY 512: Advanced Statistics for Psychological and Behavioral Research 2

SEM Analysis of Epigenetic Data

Structural Equation Modeling

Testing Structural Equation Models: The Effect of Kurtosis

Introduction to Structural Equation Models with Latent Variables. Scope. Statistics in Social Sciences. Measuring errors in Social Sciences

A study on new customer satisfaction index model of smart grid

Latent Variable Analysis

Structural Equation Modelling

Multiple group models for ordinal variables

Essentials of Structural Equation Modeling

DIAGNOSTICS OF THE ERROR FACTOR COVARIANCES OTTÓ HAJDU 1

Inference using structural equations with latent variables

USING AN EIGENVALUE DISTRIBUTION TO COMPARE COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MATRICES DISSERTATION. Presented to the Graduate Council of the

Title. Description. Remarks and examples. stata.com. stata.com. Variable notation. methods and formulas for sem Methods and formulas for sem

Introduction to Confirmatory Factor Analysis

MICHAEL SCHREINER and KARL SCHWEIZER

Chapter 3: Testing alternative models of data

Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Dominique Zephyr Applied Statistics Lab

Compiled by: Assoc. Prof. Dr Bahaman Abu Samah Department of Professional Developmentand Continuing Education Faculty of Educational Studies

A Measurement Model of Child Health: Latent Variables Approach

Multiple Group CFA Invariance Example (data from Brown Chapter 7) using MLR Mplus 7.4: Major Depression Criteria across Men and Women (n = 345 each)

Can Variances of Latent Variables be Scaled in Such a Way That They Correspond to Eigenvalues?

Mathematical Model for Computation of Reliability of Online Off-Campus Paperless Admissions System

Arturo, GARCÍA-SANTILLÁN. 1. Introduction

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING. Khaled Bedair Statistics Department Virginia Tech LISA, Summer 2013

Misspecification in Nonrecursive SEMs 1. Nonrecursive Latent Variable Models under Misspecification

2* %"/.. %4, (9 '()* +, +J:(

AN INTRODUCTION TO STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Answers to Exercises

Package semgof. February 20, 2015

Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling

A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models

Improper Solutions in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Causes and Treatments

Longitudinal Invariance CFA (using MLR) Example in Mplus v. 7.4 (N = 151; 6 items over 3 occasions)

Condition 9 and 10 Tests of Model Confirmation with SEM Techniques

An Introduction to Mplus and Path Analysis

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING

Dimensionality Assessment: Additional Methods

Structural Equation Modeling In Determining Factors that Influence User Satisfaction of KRS Online IPB

Effect of Estimation Method on Incremental Fit Indexes for Covariance Structure Models

STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS WITH LATENT VARIABLES

Minor data correction

An Introduction to Path Analysis

Stat 5101 Lecture Notes

Fit Indices Versus Test Statistics

CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS

The Classical (ML) and the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Study Causal Relationships by Structural Equation Modeling

A Parsimonious Approach to Interaction Effects in Structural Equation Models: An Application to Consumer Behavior

Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling: Issues and Practical Considerations

SRMR in Mplus. Tihomir Asparouhov and Bengt Muthén. May 2, 2018

Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, b Department of Education, University of Amsterdam,

Mathematics Review Exercises. (answers at end)

SAS/STAT 14.1 User s Guide. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling with Latent Variables

A Structural Model for Sustainable Urban Elements, Information Technology Use, and Cultural Communications in Tourism Industry

Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Bishop Chapter 2: Probability Distributions

Systematic error, of course, can produce either an upward or downward bias.

RANDOM INTERCEPT ITEM FACTOR ANALYSIS. IE Working Paper MK8-102-I 02 / 04 / Alberto Maydeu Olivares

Uppsala University and Norwegian School of Management, b Uppsala University, Online publication date: 08 July 2010

Transcription:

98 LAMPIRAN 3 STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODEL ONE CONGINERIC Use of this program is subject to the terms specified in the Convention. Universal Copyright 9/2017 DATE: 9/ TIME: 20:22 Website: www.ssicentral.com The following lines were read from file D:\1A BIMBINGAN\2 ONE CONGENERIC\DATAFULL8.LS8: Dag Sörbom L I S R E L 8.80 BY Karl G. Jöreskog & LA PM='DATA.PMM' AC='DATA.ACM' SE 1 2 3 4 5/ This program is published exclusively by Scientific International, Inc. Software 7383 N. Lincoln Avenue, Suite 100 Lincolnwood, 60712, U.S.A. IL Phone: (800)247-6113, (847)675-0720, Fax: (847)675-2140 Copyright by Scientific Software International, Inc., 1981-2006 MO NX=2 NY=3 NK=2 NE=3 LX=FU,Fi LY=FU,Fi GA=FU,Fi BE=FU.FI PH=SY,FR TD=SY,Fi PS=DI,FR TE=SY,Fi LK LE FR GA 3 1 GA 1 2 FR BE 1 2 BE 2 3 VA 1 LX 1 1 VA 0 TD 1 1 VA 1 LX 2 2

99 VA 0 TD 2 2 VA 1 LY 1 1 VA 0 TE 1 1 VA 1 LY 2 2 VA 0 TE 2 2 VA 1 LY 3 3 VA 0 TE 3 3 PD OU MI EF ----- --- -------- PI 1.00 PV 0.23 0.30 PQ 0.24 0.23 0.39 0.29 0.23 0.33 0.53 0.04 0.09 0.12 0.10 0.22 Variables 5 Variables 3 Variables 2 Variables 3 Number of Input Number of Y - Number of X - Number of ETA - Parameter Specifications BETA Number of K - Variables 2 Number of Observations 200 PI 0 1 0 PV 0 0 2 PQ 0 0 0 GAMMA Covariance Matrix

100 PI 0 3 PV 0 0 PQ 4 0 PI 1.00 - - - - PV - - 1.00 - - PHI PQ - - - - 1.00 LAMBDA-X 5 6 7 1.00 - - P - - 1.00 BETA 8 9 10 PI - - 0.82 - - (0.17) 4.70 PV - - - - 0.58 Number of Iterations = 7 (0.07) 8.19 LISREL Estimates (Robust Maximum Likelihood) LAMBDA-Y PQ - - - - - - GAMMA

101 PI - - -0.12 (0.20) -0.63 14.11 0.10 0.22 (0.03) (0.02) 3.84 14.11 PV - - - - PQ 0.63 - - P Note: This matrix is diagonal. 10.29 K Covariance Matrix of ETA and 0.81 0.17 0.18 (0.11) (0.04) (0.04) 7.62 4.70 4.28 ----- --- -------- PI 1.01 PV 0.24 0.30 PQ 0.18 0.23 0.39 0.15 0.19 0.33 0.53 0.00 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.22 PHI 0.53 (0.04) Squared Multiple Correlations for Structural Equations 0.19 0.45 0.54 Squared Multiple Correlations for Reduced Form 0.04 0.24 0.54 Reduced Form

102 Statistics Goodness of Fit PI 0.30-0.12 (0.09) (0.20) 3.36-0.63 PV 0.37 - - 6.21 PQ 0.63 - - 10.29 Squared Multiple Correlations for Y - Variables Freedom = 5 Degrees of Minimum Fit Function Chi-Square = 38.70 (P = 0.00) Normal Theory Weighted Least Squares Chi-Square = 35.31 (P = 0.00) Satorra-Bentler Scaled Chi- Square = 9.11 (P = 0.10) Chi-Square Corrected for Non-Normality = 13.41 (P = 0.020) Estimated Non-centrality Parameter (NCP) = 4.11 90 Percent Confidence Interval for NCP = (0.0 ; 16.71) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Squared Multiple Correlations for X - Variables 1.00 1.00 Minimum Function Value = 0.19 Fit Population Discrepancy Function Value (F0) = 0.021 90 Percent Confidence Interval for F0 = (0.0 ; 0.084) Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.064 90 Percent Confidence Interval for RMSEA = (0.0 ; 0.13) P-Value for Test of Close Fit (RMSEA < 0.05) = 0.30 Expected Cross- Validation Index (ECVI) = 0.15

103 90 Percent Confidence Interval for ECVI = (0.13 ; 0.21) Model = 0.15 ECVI for Saturated ECVI Independence Model = 2.26 for (RFI) = 0.96 330.54 Relative Fit Index Critical N (CN) = Chi-Square for Independence Model with 10 Degrees of Freedom = 438.78 = 448.78 29.11 30.00 CAIC = 470.28 72.09 94.47 (NFI) = 0.98 Independence AIC Model AIC = Saturated AIC = Independence Model CAIC = Saturated CAIC = Normed Fit Index Non-Normed Index (NNFI) = 0.98 Fit Parsimony Normed Fit Index (PNFI) = 0.49 Comparative Index (CFI) = 0.99 (IFI) = 0.99 Fit Incremental Fit Index Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) = 0.048 = 0.097 (GFI) = 0.93 Standardized RMR Goodness of Fit Index Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.80 Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index (PGFI) = 0.31 Modification Indices and Expected Change No Non-Zero Modification Indices for LAMBDA-Y Modification Indices for LAMBDA-X - - 31.35

104 - - - - Expected Change for LAMBDA-X PI 22.07 - - PV - - 1.00 PQ - - 22.08 - - -0.76 Expected Change for GAMMA - - - - Modification Indices for BETA PI - - - - - - PV 11.47 - - - - PI 0.76 - - PV - - 0.06 PQ - - 0.33 No Non-Zero Modification Indices for PHI PQ 1.60 4.99 - - Expected Change for BETA No Non-Zero Modification Indices for P PI - - - - - - PV -0.21 - - - - PQ -0.05-0.21 - - Modification Indices for GAMMA Modification Indices for THETA-EPS PI - - PV - - - - PQ 0.67 - - - -

105 EPS Expected Change for THETA- PI - - PV - - - - - - 106.28 0.04 Expected Change for THETA- DELTA PQ 0.02 - - - - Modification Indices for THETA-DELTA-EPS - - -0.54-0.01 3.59 2.13 - - - - 0.51 12.72 Expected Change for THETA- DELTA-EPS Maximum Modification Index is 106.28 for Element ( 2, 1) of THETA-DELTA Total and Indirect Effects Total Effects of K on ETA 0.06 0.02 - - - - 0.01 0.04 PI 0.30-0.12 Modification Indices for THETA-DELTA (0.09) (0.20) 3.36-0.63 PV 0.37 - -

106 6.21 PQ 0.63 - - 10.29 Indirect Effects of K on ETA PI 0.30 - - (0.09) 3.36 PV 0.37 - - 6.21 PQ - - - - Total Effects of ETA on ETA PI - - 0.82 0.48 (0.17) (0.13) 4.70 3.76 PV - - - - 0.58 (0.07) 8.19 PQ - - - - - - Largest Eigenvalue of B*B' (Stability Index) is 0.673 Indirect Effects of ETA on ETA PI - - - - 0.48 (0.13) 3.76 PV - - - - - - PQ - - - - - - Total Effects of ETA on Y PI 1.00 0.82 0.48 (0.17) (0.13) 4.70 3.76 PV - - 1.00 0.58 (0.07) 8.19 PQ - - - - 1.00 Indirect Effects of ETA on Y

107 PI - - 0.82 0.48 (0.17) (0.13) 4.70 3.76 PV - - - - 0.58 (0.07) 8.19 PQ - - - - - - Total Effects of K on Y PI 0.30-0.12 (0.09) (0.20) 3.36-0.63 PV 0.37 - - 6.21 PQ 0.63 - - 10.29 Seconds Time used: 0.016