ISC 5 SELF-BORING PRESSUREMETER TESTS AT THE NATIONAL FIELD TESTING FACILITY, BALLINA 5 9 SEPT 2016

Similar documents
Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation

CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual

A non-linear elastic/perfectly plastic analysis for plane strain undrained expansion tests

Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice

CPT: Geopractica Contracting (Pty) Ltd Total depth: m, Date:

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

Interpretation of Flow Parameters from In-Situ Tests (P.W. Mayne, November 2001)

The CPT in unsaturated soils

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Determining G-γ decay curves in sand from a Seismic Dilatometer Test (SDMT)

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

OBSERVATIONS AND PREDICTIONS OF SHALLOW FOUNDATION RESPONSE IN SOFT CLAY

Cavity Expansion Methods in Geomechanics

IGC. 50 th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE ESTIMATION OF FINES CONTENT FROM CPT PARAMETERS FOR CALCAREOUS SOILS OF WESTERN INDIAN OFFSHORE

Pressuremeter testing in Ruritania

From - To 0,00-4,90 4,90-6,40 6,40-8,60 8,60-9,60 9,60-10,50 10,50-12,00 12,00-14,80 14,80-15,80 15,80-19,30 19, ,00

Examples of CPTU results in other soil types. Peat Silt/ clayey sands Mine tailings Underconsolidated clay Other

Effect of embedment depth and stress anisotropy on expansion and contraction of cylindrical cavities

Interpretation of in-situ tests some insights

In Situ Tests and the Pre-failure Deformation Behaviour of Soils

Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

VIRTUAL LAB. Z Soil.PC report revised by R.F. Obrzud, A. Truty and K. Podleś. with contribution by S. Commend and Th.

1.8 Unconfined Compression Test

Engineering Units. Multiples Micro ( ) = 10-6 Milli (m) = 10-3 Kilo (k) = Mega (M) = 10 +6

Jose Brito, Cenor, Portugal

3. EVOLUTION In 1948 the basic mechanical cone was developed (Figure 1) and this cone is still in use today as the

PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO DETERMINING SOIL PARAMETERS

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

USE OF CPT/CPTU FOR SOLUTION OF

CPT: _CPTU1. GEOTEA S.R.L. Via della Tecnica 57/A San Lazzaro di Savena (BO)

Prof. B V S Viswanadham, Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Bombay

GUIDE TO CONE PENETRATION TESTING

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Suitability of the SDMT method to assess geotechnical parameters of post-flotation sediments.

Pressuremeter test in permafrost on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Offshore subsoil investigations

Conventional Field Testing & Issues (SPT, CPT, DCPT, Geophysical methods)

Interpretation of the CPT in engineering practice

ScienceDirect. Correlations between cone penetration test and seismic dilatometer Marchetti test with common laboratory investigations

The San Jacinto Monument Case History

Soil and Rock Strength. Chapter 8 Shear Strength. Steel Strength. Concrete Strength. Dr. Talat Bader May Steel. Concrete.

ABP Southampton. Environmental Statement for Port of Southampton: Berth 201/202 Works. Appendix B. Dredge Material Characterisation

CHARACTERISING THE NON LINEARITIES OF LACUSTRINE CLAYS IN THE GRENOBLE BASIN

Site characterisation for the Ballina field testing facility

5th International Workshop "CPTU and DMT in soft clays and organic soils" Poznan, Poland, Sept , 2014

INTRODUCTION PURPOSES OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS. The purposes of the geotechnical investigations were as follows:

Evaluation of soil liquefaction using the CPT Part 2

A practical method for extrapolating ambient pore pressures from incomplete pore pressure dissipation tests conducted in fine grained soils

Correlations between PENCEL Pressuremeter, Cone Penetrometer and Dilatometer Parameters

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION

Effect of Frozen-thawed Procedures on Shear Strength and Shear Wave Velocity of Sands

4 Undrained Cylindrical Cavity Expansion in a Cam-Clay Medium

Determination of silica sand stiffness

IN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc.

Advanced Lateral Spread Modeling

Use of CPT for design, monitoring, and performance verification of compaction projects

Use of Dilatometer in Unusual Difficult Soils a Case Study


Monotonic and dilatory excess pore water dissipations in silt following CPTU at variable penetration rate

Enhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization. Graduate Course CEE 6423

Evaluation of Cone Penetration Resistance in Loose Silty Sand Using Calibration Chamber

CPT Applications - Liquefaction 2

Lateral Earth Pressure


Mechanical Wave Measurements. Electromagnetic Wave Techniques. Geophysical Methods GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION. Mechanical Wave Geophysics

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 1, No 4, 2011

Research Article Determination Permeability Coefficient from Piezocone

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Introduction to Cone Penetration Testing

DRILLED DISPLACMENT PILE PERFORMANCE IN COASTAL PLAIN AND RESIDUAL SOILS

Published in: Geotechnique. DOI: /jgeot.14.P.242. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record

EVALUATION OF STRENGTH OF SOILS AGAINST LIQUEFACTION USING PIEZO DRIVE CONE

Importance of CPT in development of offshore windfarms

Performance based earthquake design using the CPT

Use of the Light Falling Weight Deflectometer (LFWD) as a site investigation tool for residual soils and weak rock

Offshore sediments. Numerical analysis of pipeline-seabed interaction using a constitutive model that considers clay destructuration

Drawing up of a geotechnical dossier for the stabilization of historical quay walls along the river Scheldt in Antwerp

Application of cyclic accumulation models for undrained and partially drained general boundary value problems

SOME OBSERVATIONS RELATED TO LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SILTY SOILS

IN SITU TESTING IN GEOMECHANICS. Fernando Schnaid Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

VARIATIONS IN PRESSUREMETER MODULUS (EM)

Liquefaction potential of Rotorua soils

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE OF SILTYSAND BASED ON LABORATORY UNDISTURBED SAMPLE AND CPT RESULTS

Canadian Geotechnical Journal. CPT-based Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) Classification System an update

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Numerical analysis for an interpretation of the pressuremeter test in cohesive soil

SHEAR STRENGTH I YULVI ZAIKA

Keywords: CPTu, pore water pressure, liquefaction analysis, Canterbury earthquake sequence

Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC

STUDY ON CONSOLIDATION OF ALLUVIAL CLAY IN NORTHERN QUEENSLAND

A Study on Dynamic Properties of Cement-Stabilized Soils

Axially Loaded Piles

Cyclic Triaxial Behavior of an Unsaturated Silty Soil Subjected to Suction Changes

Transcription:

ISC 5 5 9 SEPT 2016 SELF-BORING PRESSUREMETER TESTS AT THE NATIONAL FIELD TESTING FACILITY, BALLINA Fillippo Gaone James Doherty Susan Gourvenec Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, UWA School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, UWA Centre for Offshore Foundation Systems, UWA

National Field Testing Facility, Ballina Site description Located north of Ballina, New South Wales A1 Site location Ballina

National Field Testing Facility, Ballina Site description Located north of Ballina, New South Wales Managed by CGSE to develop and demonstrate new and existing site investigation tools. In situ testing involves: CPT/CPTu SDMT Shear vane HPT (Hydrostatik Profile Tool) Piezoball T-bar SBPM

National Field Testing Facility, Ballina Classification of the ground conditions Normalised Cone Resistance, Q tn 1000 100 10 1. Sensitive Fine Grained 7 2. Clay - Organic Soil 3. Clays - Clay to Silty Clay 4. Silt mixtures: clayey silt & silty clay 5. Sand mixtures: silty sand to sandy silt 6. Sands: clean sands to silty sands 7. Dense sand to gravelly sand 8. Stiff sand to clayey sand (OC or cemented) 9. Stiff fine-grained (OC or cemented) 0m to 1.5m 0m 1.5m 1.5m to 15.5m 1.5m 12m 12m 15.5m 18m to 18m 18m to 20.4m 1 2 1 0.1 1 10 Normalised Friction Ratio, F R (%) Robertson et al. (1986) Q tn -R r chart 6 5 8 4 3 9 0.50m AHD ALLUVIAL CLAYEY SILTY SANT -1.00m AHD ESTUARINE SILTY CLAY -12.50m AHD SILT / STIFF PLEISTOCENE CLAY -0.50m AHD Water Level F r [%] 0 200 4000 10600 200 30 40 10 20 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 q net [kpa] 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 S u [kpa]

The Self-Boring Pressuremeter What is a pressuremeter? Cylindrical, insitu testing device to measure: Inflating pressure Radial expansion Introduced by Menard (1956) in France Placed into a pre-drilled bore hole Soil disturbance: Borehole walls remoulding Stress relief Pressuremeter prototype 1956

The Self-Boring Pressuremeter Developments in pressuremeter equipment 1. Installation into a pre-bored hole 2. Installation by pushing 3. Installation by self-boring mechanism

The Self-Boring Pressuremeter Self-boring mechanism Almost undisturbed soil basic soil parameters Consists of a cutting shoe and a rotating cutter Installation steps: Conventional drilling of a bore hole to 1m above the target depth Gently pushing the pressuremeter into the ground by simultaneously cutting and hoisting the borehole cuttings Rest period to allow excess pore pressure to dissipate Source: www.cambridge-insitu.com

Data Interpretation Interpretation of the basic soil parameters σ h, s u and G Total horizontal stress, σ h : Inspection method Lunne & Lacasse (1982) Undrained shear strength, s u : Gibson and Anderson (1961) Shear modulus, G UR : Palmer (1972) But more is possible

Total Pressure, p [MPa] Data Interpretation Inspection method (Lunne & Lacasse, 1982): : 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.08 Total pressure, p [M Pa] 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 σ h Lift off 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Average Cavity Strain ε [%] 0 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 ln ε [%]

Total Pressure, p [MPa] Data Interpretation Gibson and Anderson (1961) Based on an elastic-perfectly plastic soil model, Gibson and Anderson derived the following equation to determine the undrained shear strength s u. s u = p ln V V 2 1 V V 1 + v p 0 E 0.11 0.1 Based on the Menard pressuremeter 0.09 S u,uncorrected For the SBPM the equation can be reduced to: s u = p ln V V 0.08 0.07 0.06 1 1 S u,corrected 0.05 2 4 8 16 Ln ε [%]

Total Pressure, p [MPa] G UR / p' [-] Data Interpretation Palmer (1972) The shear modulus may either be determined from the initial part of the stress-strain curve or from an unload-reload loop carried out at a nominated cavity strain 90 Depends on the strain range 0.14 80 70 60 0.12 0.10 0.08 0.06 G = 1 dp 2 dε 50 40 30 0.04 0.02 0.00 0 2 4 6 8 10 Average Cavity Strain, ε [%] 20 10 0 BH 1 BH 5 BH 6 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 Strain range, ε r [%]

Depth, z [m] Depth, z [m] Results Validation against other field data from the Ballina site: Total Stress [kpa] Undrained shear strength, s u [kpa] 0 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Lift off pressure 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 σ h (k 0 = 1.5) 5 5 6 σ v 6 7 8 σ h (k0 = 0.7) 7 8 3 Arm interpretation CPT Shear vane

Results More is possible σ h, s u Initial Parameters Model Simulation The new inverse analysis tool developed at the University of Western Australia allows the identification of a representative MCC parameter set. Model Data Compare Model Data with Test Data and evaluate objective function Optimisation routine determines new set of parameters Is objective function < Tolerance No Yes κ, λ, R, M Terminate with optimal parameters

Conclusions The self-boring pressuremeter is a repeatable and reliable method of determining the in situ undrained shear strength, shear modulus and in situ horizontal stress It is an economical alternative to laboratory testing The quality of the data relies mainly on the quality of the self-drilling process and on the applied interpretation method

JamesDoherty2 SusanGourvenec @SusanGourvenec This exercise is a research project, funded by the Australian Research Council, for the purpose of advancing geotechnical knowledge and practice for the benefit of all.