Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam

Similar documents
INFLOW DESIGN FLOOD CONTROL SYSTEM PLAN 40 C.F.R. PART PLANT YATES ASH POND 2 (AP-2) GEORGIA POWER COMPANY

THE NEED FOR AN ADDITIONAL SPILLWAY AT THE SANFORD DAM BOILING SPRING LAKES, NC. Presentation for The Brunswick County Commissioners April 20, 2015

North Carolina Simplified Inundation Maps For Emergency Action Plans December 2010; revised September 2014; revised April 2015

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY CHESTERFIELD POWER STATION LOWER ASH POND CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Appendix C. Pleasure Lake Emergency Action Plan

Louisiana s NIKE Approach to EAPs: Just Do It

President s Day Weekend Storm Community Meeting and Workshop April 17, 2017

Emergency Action Plan

DAM SAFETY PROGRAM DAM INSPECTION REPORT FORM FOR REGULATORY INSPECTION

Limited Visual Dam Safety Inspections OA Oahu Reservoir No Oahu, Hawaii

WEST CATARACT CREEK DAM FINAL DESIGN REPORT

STRUCTURAL STABILITY ASSESSMENT

Interpretive Map Series 24

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

CCR Rule Annual Inspection Report (cont.) 2

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT FOR SR. 0522, SECTION 5BN ALONG BLACKLOG CREEK CROMWELL TOWNSHIP HUNTINGDON COUNTY. Prepared for:

USGS Flood Inundation Mapping of the Suncook River in Chichester, Epsom, Pembroke and Allenstown, New Hampshire

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

COPPER MOUNTAIN MINE TAILINGS MANAGEMENT FACILITY DAM BREACH INUNDATION STUDY REVISION 1. Submitted to: Copper Mountain Mine (BC) Ltd.

Monitoring Scour Critical Bridges During Floods For Local Bridge Owners. Presented by

United States Multi-Hazard Early Warning System

COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM FLOODS INTRODUCTION

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

A Simple Procedure for Estimating Loss of Life from Dam Failure. Wayne J. Graham, P.E. 1

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Is It Safe to Frack Beneath Lake Lewisville?

Modeling Great Britain s Flood Defenses. Flood Defense in Great Britain. By Dr. Yizhong Qu

HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GADSDEN ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i)-(xii)

design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the BAP is consistent with recognized and generally accepted good engineering standards.

SAN JACINTO RIVER / BAUTISTA CREEK LEVEE SYSTEM RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD ID #

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 6-0 HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT. for SR 3062, SECTION 29S STRASBURG ROAD.

Attachment B to Technical Memorandum No.2. Operations Plan of Ross Valley Detention Basins

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

This is a digital document from the collections of the Wyoming Water Resources Data System (WRDS) Library.

Flood Scenario Worksheet

FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING OF DHAKA-NARAYANGANJ-DEMRA (DND) PROJECT USING GEO-INFORMATICS TOOLS

Tailings Dam Classification and Breach Analyses, Perspectives from the Canadian Dam Association

Section 4: Model Development and Application

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Issue 44: Phase II & III H&H Issues Date: 07/03/2006 Page 1

Standards for Soil Erosion and Sediment Control in New Jersey May 2012

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Timeframe. Crow Wing County, Baxter, Brainerd, Breezy Point, Crosby, Crosslake, Cuyuna, Deerwood, Emily, Fifty

Evaluation of Public Safety at Run-of-River Dams

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT IN MID- EASTERN PART OF DHAKA, BANGLADESH

Chapter 1 Overview of Maps

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY The Electronic Journal of the International Association for Environmental Hydrology VOLUME

Rebuilding Flood-Conscious Society

Floods. Floods COMMUNITY EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM FLOODS CONTENT INSTRUCTOR GUIDANCE

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017


WP2.1 BREACH FORMATION LARGE SCALE EMBANKMENT FAILURE

Daily Operations Briefing Wednesday, February 15, :30 a.m. EST

Local Flood Hazards. Click here for Real-time River Information

Dam Break Analysis Using HEC-RAS and HEC-GeoRAS A Case Study of Ajwa Reservoir

APPENDIX E GREATER SPRINGFIELD RELIABILTIY PROJECT DRAINAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE NEWGATE/PHELPS ROAD AND THE HATCHETT HILL ROAD AREAS

NEEDLES S STREET LEVEE SYSTEM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA NLD SYSTEM ID #

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Red River Levee Panel

Base Level Engineering FEMA Region 6

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

DRAFT - Tsunami Response Plan Playbook Santa Cruz Harbor Maritime Community

Analysis of Hydraulic Impacts on the Schuylkill River

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

PRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK

Stone Outlet Sediment Trap

Appendix 15 Computational Methodology

Results of the Sava River Model

MEDIA RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 17, 2014 Preparing for the Spring Thaw

STABILIZATION OF THE H&CT RAILWAY STONE DAM WALTER E. SKIPWITH, PE, JOYCE CRUM, AIA AND JOHN BAUMGARTNER, PE. Introduction.

Todd N. Loar, PG, CEG

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

2014 San Gabriel Valley Water Forum. October 2, 2014

CITY OF RIVERSIDE USING HAZUS TO CREATE A EARTHQUAKE PLANNING GUIDE FOR A UNIFIED FIELD RESPONSE

RESERVOIR DRAWDOWN RATES/RESERVOIR DRAWDOWN TEST Iron Gate, Copco (I & II), and JC Boyle Dams

OC Public Works El Niño Storm Preparation 2015

EMERGENCY WARNING SYSTEM PROCEDURES FOR DEBRIS FLOWS IN WESTERN OREGON

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

ENGINEERING HYDROLOGY

NFIE-Response in Travis County, Texas Connecting NFIE Flood Forecasts to Transportation Infrastructure

Chapter 3 Erosion in the Las Vegas Wash

Real-Time Flood Forecasting Modeling in Nashville, TN utilizing HEC-RTS

Badger Flood Situation Report. Robert Picco Amir Ali Khan Ken Rollings. Department of Environment Water Resources Management Division

FRED BURR DAM FEASIBILITY STUDY

Suitable Applications Sediment traps should be considered for use:

GIS for Planning and Revenue Collection

Appendix B2 Hydraulics

Feasibility Study for Potential Removal of McLane & Goldman Dams Souhegan River, Milford, NH. Public Kick-off Meeting

Chapter 10 - Sacramento Method Examples

Daily Operations Briefing. Friday, May 5, :30 a.m. EDT

CHAPTER FIVE: THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI REGION AND PLAQUEMINES PARISH

APPENDIX B HYDROLOGY

Transcription:

For Official Use Only Not for Public Distribution 02/03/16 Emergency Action Plan (EAP) Tata Pond Dam State of Connecticut Dam ID: 0000 Town or City, County, Connecticut Name of Dam Owner Dam Hazard Classification is B Reviewed and Updated: Dam Owner or Owner s Representative Emergency Management Director, Town or City, CT Date Date Copy of

Description Table of Contents Page 1 Basic EAP Data...1 1.1 Purpose...1 1.2 General...1 1.3 Dam Description...1 1.4 Directions to Dam...2 1.5 Emergency Conditions...2 1.6 Breach Modeling Assumptions...3 1. Potential Impacted Area...3 2 Roles and Responsibilities...4 2.1 Dam Owner s Representative...4 2.2 Dam Operator s Representative...4 2.3 State Dam Safety Agency...4 2.4 Incident Commander...5 2.5 Norfolk Local Emergency Operations Center (LEOC)...5 3 The Five-step EAP Process...6 3.1 Step 1 - Event Detection... 3.2 Step 2 - Emergency Level Determination... 3.2.1 Emergency Level 1: Nonemergency, unusual event, slowly developing... 3.2.2 Emergency Level 2: Potential dam failure situation, rapidly developing... 3.2.3 Emergency Level 3: Urgent; dam failure appears imminent or is in progress... 3.2.4 Guidance for Determining the Emergency Level...8 3.2.5 Examples of Emergency Situations...9 3.3 Step 3 - Notification and Communication...11 3.3.1 Notification...11 3.3.2 Communication...11 3.3.3 Notification Charts...13 3.3.4 Emergency Level 1 Notifications...14 3.3.4.1 Emergency Level 2 Notifications...15 3.3.4.2 Emergency Level 3 Notifications...16 3.3.4.3 Emergency Services Contacts... 3.4 Step 4 - Expected Actions...19 3.4.1 Emergency Level 1: Nonemergency, unusual event; slowly developing...19 3.4.2 Emergency Level 2: Potential dam failure situation; rapidly developing...19 3.4.3 Emergency Level 3: Urgent; dam failure appears imminent or is in progress... 3.5 Step 5 - Termination...23 Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT I-i

Description Table of Contents (Continued) Page 4 Maintenance - EAP Review and Revision... 24 4.1 EAP Call Out Exercise... 24 4.2 EAP Tabletop Exercise... 24 4.3 Revisions... 25 5 Record of Holders of Control Copies of this EAP... 26 6 Record of Revisions and Updates Made to EAP... 2 Concurrences... Appendices Appendix A 1 Appendix A 2 Appendix A 3 Appendix A 4 Appendix B 1 Appendix B 2 End of Report Contact Checklist... (1-2 pages) Unusual or Emergency Event Log Form... (1 page) Dam Emergency Termination Log... (1 page) Glossary of Terms... (5 pages) Resources Available... (1 page) Aerial, Location and Watershed Maps... (2 pages) Appendix B 3 Evacuation Maps... (1-10 pages, 11 x ) Appendix B 4 Residents/Roads at Risk Table... (1-6 pages) Appendix B 5 LEOC and Emergency Shelter Addresses... (1 page) Appendix B 6 Plan-Profile of Tata Pond Dam... (1-4 pages, 11 x ) Appendix B Flood Inundation Summary Table... (1-3 pages) Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT I-ii

For Official Use Only Not for Public Distribution 02/03/16 1 Basic EAP Data 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Emergency Action Plan (EAP) is to provide advanced warning of a potential failure of Tata Pond Dam to allow time to take mitigating action to prevent a dam failure, and to minimize the loss of life and injury from a dam failure. This EAP is to be used in conjunction with the Town or City Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) and guidelines. 1.2 General In order to accomplish the above purpose, an inspection and monitoring program is to be established including both routine inspections and monitoring during severe storm events. This EAP defines responsibilities for inspections and notifications, provides procedures for identifying conditions that could result in failure of the dam, and provides mapping of the potential inundation area from a dam failure (evacuation area). The Glossary of Terms can be found in Appendix A-4. This EAP should be distributed to the appropriate emergency management officials with adequate explanation to place the hazard potential of the dam in its proper perspective. The local emergency management officials are responsible for warning and evacuating the downstream residents if a dam failure is imminent. The EAP should be exercised periodically to assure that all phases work as intended. Section 4 describes the training and exercising of the EAP to improve the close coordination necessary for a successful execution of emergency procedures during an emergency. This EAP should be reviewed biennially and modified, if found necessary, as noted in Section 4. The review should verify personnel assignments, any change in emergency management officials to be notified and/or telephone numbers, significant development or construction activity downstream of the dam, or modifications to the dam and/or spillway. 1.3 Dam Description Tata Pond Dam consists of an earthen embankment, concrete spillway and training walls, and a lowlevel outlet with a sluice gate and weir boards. The upstream slope is riprapped above spillway level with grass cover on the remaining upstream slope, dam crest, and downstream slope. A footbridge spans the principal spillway and a vehicle access gate is located on the left abutment. Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT Page 1

For Official Use Only Not for Public Distribution 02/03/16 Built/Upgraded: 16/16 Connecticut Dam ID No.: 0000 Height: 0 feet Dam Operator: Operator Name Drainage Area: 0 mi 2 Major Property Owner: Property Owner Name Impoundment Area: 0 acres Spillway Length: 0 feet Hazard Classification: Class B Significant Purpose: Recreation Latitude: 00 00'00"N Longitude: 00 00'00"W Outflow Location: Howard Creek 1.4 Directions to Dam Tata Pond Dam is located in Town or City, CT. Directions to the dam are as follows: (See Location, Watershed, and Aerial Maps; [Appendix B 2].) 1.5 Emergency Conditions Emergency conditions at the dam may be caused by any one of at least four different conditions: Excessive precipitation Seepage, including internal erosion and/or piping Earthquake Sabotage The spillway at Tata Pond Dam can safely discharge floods with recurrence intervals in excess of 100 years. As the dam would not be overtopped by one-half the probable maximum flood (1/2 PMF), the most likely cause of failure is excessive seepage resulting in internal erosion or piping through the embankment. This condition should develop gradually and could occur at any time, although it is more likely during a severe storm when the pond level is above normal and causing additional pressure on the dam. The majority of this EAP document is predicated on the presumption that the cause of the emergency condition is seepage and internal erosion associated with excessive precipitation. Should advance warning be available for any of the other conditions, the evacuation area, emergency procedures, and notification listing would be equally applicable. Tata Pond Dam is located in Seismic Zone 2A. Intensity of earthquakes in this zone are predicted to result in moderate damage. Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT Page 2

For Official Use Only Not for Public Distribution 02/03/16 The EAP includes: Actions the dam owner will take to moderate or alleviate a problem at the dam; Actions the dam owner will take, and in coordination with emergency management authorities, to respond to incidents or emergencies related to the dam; Procedures dam owners will follow to issue early warning and notification messages to responsible downstream emergency management authorities; Inundation maps to assist dam owners and emergency management authorities identify critical infrastructure sites and population at risk that may require protective measures, warning, and evacuation planning; and Delineation of the responsibilities of all those involved in managing an incident or emergency and how the responsibilities should be coordinated. 1.6 Breach Modeling Assumptions The Limits of Potential Flooding for failure of Tata Pond Dam were calculated under the following conditions: The pre-breach water level in Tata Pond is at the crest of the dam; There is significant flooding of Howard Creek from uncontrolled drainage areas; There is unobstructed flow through downstream bridges; The antecedent flow in the downstream channel was set equal to the 500-year FEMA flood flows; and A 2 foot differential exists at the downstream limits of potential flooding. This is a conservative estimate, but not the largest possible breach. If conditions exist that would result in a larger breach (such as a higher lake level), or if breach wave debris (such as trees, cars, structures, etc.) clog the bridge crossings, additional nearby properties may need to be evacuated. The limits of potential flooding used in the preparation of this EAP were derived using the US Army Corp of Engineers HEC-RAS computer program. 1. Potential Impacted Area See Evacuation Maps [Appendix B 3] and Resident/Roads at Risk [Appendix B 4] for the locations of the residents and roads along Howard Creek that may be flooded if the dam should fail. The Flood Inundation Summary Table [Appendix B-] shows the approximate time for the flood crest to travel from the dam to each downstream section, the maximum estimated USGS elevation of the flood crest, the maximum estimated flow in cubic feet per second (cfs), the antecedent flow elevation and the increase in depth of flow at each section. Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT Page 3

For Official Use Only Not for Public Distribution 02/03/16 3 The Five-step EAP Process Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT Page 6

For Official Use Only Not for Public Distribution 02/03/16 Appendix B 3 Evacuation Maps Tata Pond Dam (No. 0000), Town or City, County, CT Page B5

Stone Dr 3 ³ 150 21 1501 1519 34 432 11 Angeli 16 433 154 Ct 89 1654 422 11 1664 < 14 412 Legend 39 24 02 166 9 144 AMTRAK 6 ' %90.8 90.2 3 83 9 84 344 350 99 114 Oconnell Dr 112 3 Avoid - Bridge Bridge Crossing Prohibited Railroad <Flow Direction ' 1 0.2 0.4 9 3 335 83 Limit of Potential Flooding Evacuation Area Cross Section Hours to Initial River Rise Hours to Peak Stage 104 111 336 314 124 116 12 300 309 99 136 2 1 18 0000 2 5 1 262 Mill Dam 142 222 23 2 18 263 131 190 243 New AMTRAK %90.9 90.3 Orchard Rd 6 Park Dr 226 Watch Hill %91.0 90.4 Spruce Brook Rd Olisky Blvd Maryann Ct < Toll Gate Rd Howard Creek «15 5 Bishops Curve Bishops Curv Meadow Casne r Dr Berlin Tpke Wilbur Cross Hwy State Hwy 15 199 4 05 ' 11 9 8 8 1 192 234 1980 4 1943 186 1 5 235 244 1 195 2 16 1 254 1 261 19 999 155 151 264 132 23 1934 1 26 US Hwy 5 222 118 135 9 134 133 43 9 108 119 4 18 1 1 51 65 1 106 105 23 101 6 15 102 1906 35 185 94 166 12 69 186 9 32 1 151 84 33 50 6 36 59 1861 14 132 51 34 64 1 135 ' 14 ' 22 110 1830 1 1801 30-32 103 0 82 8 81 59 91 Ln 33 Red Barn Ct 85 10 %91.2 90.6 141 869 Jeffrey Ln 18 9 Holly Ct 25 183 86 Tree Hill Rd 835 Kramer Dr Four Rod Rd Notes: - Base mapping consists of 12 Connecticut Color Orthophotos, Parcel data and Hydrography features from CT DEEP GIS databases. - For the purpose of clarity, cross sections used in the computations are not all shown. - Evacuation area based on inundation map resulting from a breach with water level at the top of the dam and downstream antecedent flow equal to the FEMA 500-year peak discharge. - Evacuation area includes properties cut off from emergency services due to a dam breach. 1823 10 1032 11 80 982 10 1031 1049 8 9 16 41 19 62 63 9 5 24 1 49 959 35 34 18 26 182 949 43 188 3 93 0 125 198 6 51 162 909 16 0 26 25 80 23 1 152 6 151 895 15 184 86 80 65 1 862 1 3 14 6 10 225 85 1 8 5 8 136 859 00 1 133 55 26 125 124 135 193 108 3 8 2 861 6 5 832 111 114 850 5 4 822 35 3 849 100 113 39 823 166 11 51 90 806 839 85 16 91 165 80 8 8 80 1660 8 1 5 90 63 30 6 18 101 0 8 Fawn Dr Worthington 1631 65 102 41 13 60 62 4 31 809 66 82 66 Ridge 1623 11 Wilks Pond Rd 113 55 Peter Parley Row 60 114 50 113 54 4 1326 801 123 34 Dunham Dr 105 43 82 124 95 13 Jarvis Ln 135 85 6 90 33 114 3 31 Valley Dr Lower Ln 55 32 59 9 Sage Dr 100 1 134 1 106 15 8 1308 1303 44 4 41 22 84 186 Wildermere Rd 144 25 18 6 103 19 6 14 3 115 12 9 19 12 1 8 8 31 13 1 50 4 26 60 1 35 25 16 19 3 126 125 63 110 102 92 15 36 62 09 43 1263 06 61 12 699 6 12 15 39 16 52 49 6 63 12 1243 2 33 5 66 690 1230 1233 Pondside Dr 349 1 Smoky Hill Rd 63 1224 %91.5 90.8 1223 30 22 12 1160 4 12 130 < 1 ' 654 15 Cindy Ln 1492 12 1 orto Rd Deerfield Dr 106 326 6 1198 134 1195 13 598 3 631 16 Sheet Index 1 3 2 323 316 143 624 1188 134 313 52 306 2 1183 Figure No. Limits of Potential Flooding and Evacuation Area B-3 Tata Pond Dam, Town or City, CT - Dam ID No. 0000 0 250 500 50 1,000 Feet Sheet 2 of 3 Owner Name February 16