Space Debris Mitigation Activities at ESA

Similar documents
Space Debris Mitigation Activities at ESA in 2013

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Policy Updates

SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN INDIA

Tailoring the Observation Scenarios and Data Processing Techniques for Supporting Conjunction Event Assessments

GEO protected region: ISON capabilities to provide informational support for tasks of spacecraft flight safety and space debris removal

USA Space Debris Environment and Operational Updates

IADC Re-Entry Prediction Campaigns

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

The Characteristics and Consequences of the Break-up of the Fengyun-1C Spacecraft

Orbital Debris Challenges for Space Operations J.-C. Liou, PhD NASA Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris

USA Space Debris Environment, Operations, and Modeling Updates

OVERVIEW ON 2012 SPACE DEBRIS ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE

INTER-AGENCY SPACE DEBRIS COORDINATION COMMITTEE (IADC) SPACE DEBRIS ISSUES IN THE GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT AND THE GEOSTATIONARY TRANSFER ORBITS

COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION STRATEGY FOR THE GSOC GEO SATELLITES

Orbital Debris Mitigation

THE EUROPEAN SPACE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN CONCEPTS

Prof. Richard Crowther Chief Engineer, UK Space Agency. Reflections on Orbital Debris Mitigation Measures

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

Swiss Contributions to a Better Understanding of the Space Debris Environment

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

Space Debris Activities in India

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

The Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC)

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIA ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

EXPANDING KNOWLEDGE ON REAL SITUATION AT HIGH NEAR-EARTH ORBITS

Assessment and Categorization of TLE Orbit Errors for the US SSN Catalogue

Contribution of ISON and KIAM space debris. space

COLLISION AVOIDANCE ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR CONTROLLED GEO/GSO SPACECRAFTS WITH ORBITAL DEBRIS

Optical Tracking and Characterization of Space Objects

IMPACT OF SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE MISSION DESIGN OF ESA SPACECRAFT

How to Improve Small Satellite Missions in Two Easy Steps:

Collision Risk Assessment for Spacecraft with CASS

The use of ASPOS OKP System in the interests of ensuring the safety of space operations and increasing awareness about the situation in high orbits

Debris Mitigation Efforts

Eutelsat practice & views on long term sustainability. COPUOS/SCST - LTS Workshop Vienna, 14 February 2013

JAC Conjunction Assessment

on space debris objects obtained by the

Modeling of the Orbital Debris Environment Risks in the Past, Present, and Future

RECENT SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN FRANCE F.ALBY

9 th US/Russian Space Surveillance Workshop

STUDY THE SPACE DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE EARLY STAGES OF THE NANO-SATELLITE DESIGN

Asia-Pacific ground-base Optical Satellite Observation System APOSOS

Catcher s Mitt Final Report

Space debris and NEAs research at IFAC-CNR

Commercial SSA Catalog Performance

Overview of JAXA Activities on Sustainable Space Development and Space Situational Awareness

Space debris. feature. David Wright

A Summary of the Galaxy 15 Incident and its Impact on Space Sustainability

Implementation of the Outer Space Treaties in view of Small Satellites

A Space Debris Alert System for Aviation. US Patent pending Inventor: T. Sgobba - ESA Independent Safety Office

UPDATE OF ESA DRAMA ARES: COMPARISON OF ENVISAGED COLLISION ALERTS WITH OPERATIONAL STATISTICS AND IMPACT OF CATALOGUE ACCURACY

Yahsat s Approach to GEO Collision Avoidance A Case Stduy with STTW-4

Effects of Mitigation Measures on the Space Debris Environment

Space Debris Re-entries and Aviation Safety

SPACE DEBRIS. Hazard Evaluation and Mitigation. Edited by. Nickolay N. Smirnov. Moscow M.V. Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia

The Outer Space Legal Regime and UN Register of Space Objects

Sirius talks Space economy: urgent need for new global regulation? Space Policy

Sustainable activities in space: Space debris problematic in a nutshell

IMPROVED CONJUNCTION ANALYSIS VIA COLLABORATIVE SPACE SITUATIONAL AWARENESS

Propellantless deorbiting of space debris by bare electrodynamic tethers

Eutelsat practice & views on long term sustainability of space activities

DESIGN STANDARD. Micro-debris Impact Survivability Assessment Procedure

Space Systems Space Debris Mitigation

closeap: GMV S SOLUTION FOR COLLISION RISK ASSESSMENT

Current issues in Space Situational Awareness (SSA) and Space Traffic Management (STM)

Analysis of Debris from the Collision of the Cosmos 2251 and the Iridium 33 Satellites

General Assembly. United Nations A/AC.105/951

Accuracy Assessment of SGP4 Orbit Information Conversion into Osculating Elements

Major fragmentation of Atlas 5 Centaur upper stage B (SSN #40209)

Space Debris Mapping Services for use by LEO Satellite Operators. Adam Archuleta DigitalGlobe,

ACTIVITY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON SPACE DEBRIS PROBLEM

Space Object Registration by the European Space Agency: current policy and practice

DE-ORBITATION STUDIES AND OPERATIONS FOR SPIRALE GTO SATELLITES

TUNDRA DISPOSAL ORBIT STUDY

CIVIL PROTECTION AND SAFE SKY

Orbital Debris: Time to Remove

Joint R&D and Ops: a Working Paradigm for SSA

Achievements of Space Debris Observation

D.Fornarelli (1), B.Bastida Virgili (2), K.Merz (3), E.Maestroni (3), N.Mardle (3), T.Parrinello (3)

Space Debris Assessment for USA-193

estec ESA Space Debris Mitigation Compliance Verification Guidelines

Fragmentation Consequence Analysis for LEO and GEO Orbits

ESA s Annual Space Environment Report

Accepted Manuscript. Stephen Hobbs. S (10) /j.asr Reference: JASR 10051

SIMONETTA DI PIPPO, DIRECTOR United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs United Nations Office at Vienna

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

The Space Situation Monitoring Laboratory What s Happening in Space?

DARPA Perspective on Space Situational Awareness

Debris Detection and Observation Systems. Rüdiger Jehn ESA/ESOC, Robert-Bosch-Str. 5, Darmstadt, Germany,

RISK INDUCED BY THE UNCATALOGUED SPACE DEBRIS POPULATION IN THE PRESENCE OF LARGE CONSTELLATIONS

Conjunction Risk Assessment and Avoidance Maneuver Planning Tools

Dealing with the asteroid impact threat in Europe - ESA's SSA-NEO programme status

SST ANALYSIS TOOL (SSTAN) SUPPORTING SPACE SURVEILLANCE AND TRACKING (SST) SERVICES ASSESSMENT

Communications satellites

THE KESSLER SYNDROME: IMPLICATIONS TO FUTURE SPACE OPERATIONS

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

DEBRIS CLOUD ANALYTICAL PROPAGATION FOR A SPACE ENVIRONMENTAL INDEX

IAC-17-F Attitude State Evolution of Space Debris Determined from Optical Light Curve Observations

ATTITUDE CONTROL MECHANIZATION TO DE-ORBIT SATELLITES USING SOLAR SAILS

Transcription:

Space Debris Mitigation Activities at ESA Heiner Klinkrad ESA Space Debris Office H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 1

Space Debris Environment in 2010 4,765 launches and 251 on-orbit break-ups led to 16,200 objects in the US Space Surveillance Network (SSN) catalog by Dec. 2010 launches in 2010 70 mass on orbit ~6,700 tons catalog orbital distribution: low Earth orbits 77%; near-geostationary orbits 6%; highly eccentric orbits 10%; other orbits (incl. GNSS) 7% catalog composition: 20% satellites (only ~6% operational), 11% rocket bodies, 5% mission-related objects, and 64% fragments (41% before the FengYun 1C ASAT test and the collision between Cosmos-2251 and Iridium 33) consequences of recent in-orbit engagements/collisions: FengYun 1C (11 Jan. 2007) 3,040 cataloged fragments; Iridium-33/C-2251 (10 Feb. 2009) 1961 cataloged fragments H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 2

History of On-Orbit Space Objects Iridium-33/ Cosmos-2251 FengYun 1C H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 3

ESA Collision Event Statistics for 2010 conjunction event screening process at ESA: screened ESA satellites: Envisat, ERS-2, CryoSat-2 conjunction event screening performed with regard to all US SSN catalog objects; daily forecasts are performed automatically, on a 24/7 basis avoidance maneuver criteria: collision probability exceeds 1 in 1,000; maneuver must be based on actionable orbit data (i.e. JSpOC or ESA orbit determinations with information on related uncertainties) conjunction event statistics for the year 2010: 5 events exceeded a collision probability of 1 in 1,000 (4 for Envisat, 1 for ERS-2); 49 events exceeded a collision probability of 1 in 10,000 (43 for Envisat; 4 for ERS-2; 2 for Cryosat-2); near-miss events: 8 at < 100m, 22 at < 200m, 40 at < 300m, 70 at < 400m, and 104 at < 500m conjunctor objects: 19% spacecraft, 4% orbital stages, 3% mission-related objects, and 75% fragmentation debris (25% Cosmos-2251, 20% Iridium- 33, 14% FengYun 1C, 11% rocket bodies, 5% other spacecraft) repeated close conjunctions: 118 conjunctions of Cryosat-2 with KITSAT; 98 conjunctions of Cryosat-2 with SwissCube avoidance maneuvers: 9 in total (4 for Envisat, 4 for ERS-2, 1 for Cryosat-2) H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 4

Recent High-Risk Conjunction for Envisat conjunction of Envisat (02-009A) with an Iridium 33 fragment (97-051AA): predicted conjunctions on Dec. 01, 2010, at 20:01 21:41 23:41 UTC, at a total distance of 757m 47m 794m, with a radial separation of 63m +25m +66m (based on JSpOC CSM data & ESA Envisat data) Envisat: max. dimension 26m; Iridium fragment: max. dimension ~0.2m collision probability at t 2d: 1 in 49 (highest so far at maneuver decision time) a two-burn avoidance maneuver (2 1.5 cm/s) between the 1 st and 2 nd, and after the 3 rd conjunction increased the min. separation to 160m (100m radial) H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 5

GEO Satellite Retirements in 2010* GEO disposal statistics compiled by ESA with inputs from the USA, Russia, national space agencies, and commercial operators 11 satellites were re-orbited according to IADC Guidelines TDRS-1 (83-026B, USA) disposal at 357 km x 515 km above GEO Satcom C-3 (92-060B, USA) disposal at 826 km x 1056 km above GEO Thaicom 1 (93-078B, Thailand) disposal at 302 km x 317 km above GEO Brazilsat B1 (94-049A, Brazil) disposal at 282 km x 298 km above GEO PAS 4 (95-040A, USA) disposal at 803 km x 1011 km above GEO Nahuel 1A (97-002B, Argentina) disposal at 241 km x 265 km above GEO * BSAT-1A (97-016B, Japan) disposal at 309 km x 345 km above GEO Intelsat VIII F-2 (97-031A, Int.) disposal at 500 km x 738 km above GEO Eutelsat W2 (98-056A, Eut.) disposal at 281 km x 294 km above GEO Insat 4CR (07-037A, India) disposal at 275 km x 299 km above GEO Rascom QAF 1 (07-063A, Mauritius) disposal at 313 km x 372 km above GEO * Nahuel 1A might marginally penetrate the 200 km zone within a 100-year prediction time span H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 6

GEO Satellite Retirements in 2010 (cont d) 4 satellites were re-orbited too low (within GEO ± 200 km) Thaicom 2 (94-065B, Thailand) disposal at 192 km x 198 km above GEO Galaxy 9 (96-033A, USA) disposal at 178 km x 242 km above GEO Insat 2E (99-016A, India) disposal at 147 km x 205 km above GEO Yamal-100 No.2 (99-047B, Russia) disposal at 71 km x 95 km above GEO 1 satellites were left in the GEO protected region (GEO ± 200 km) Turksat 3 (96-040B, Turkey) left in libration around L1 (75 E) 2 satellites started to librate around L1 (within GEO ± 200 km) Cosmos-2240 (08-033A, Russia) identified by KIAM as being active Beidou DW2 (Compass G2) (09-018A) operational status uncertain Galaxy 15 (05-041A, USA) was in libration around L2 after a contingency; the spacecraft was recovered in Dec. 2010 and it is now back under control 1 orbital stage was left crossing the GEO protected region (GEO ± 200 km) Delta 4 2 nd stage (10-063B) 33,857km x 35,673km (87km penetration) H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 7

Orbit Control Status of GEO Object in 2010 1,274 objects were in or near the GEO ring in Dec. 2010 16 satellites were retired; 24 satellites and 2 stages were newly inserted 397 satellites are orbit-controlled (266 of them in E-W and N-S) * based on US SSN catalog data, ESA s DISCOS Database, and KIAM/ISON data H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 8

GEO End-of-Life Disposal History 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Total Left at L 1 5 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 1 26 (14.5%) Left at L 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 (5.1%) Left at L 1 /L 2 2 1 1 4 (2.2%) Drift orbit (too low) Drift orbit (compliant) 4 2 6 5 7 5 5 7 1 1 6 4 53 (29.6%) 5 3 2 4 8 5 11 9 11 6 12 11 87 (48.6%) Annual Total 15 11 14 11 16 13 19 19 13 11 21 16 179 (100%) compliance with IADC GEO end-of-life re-orbiting guidelines has improved during the past 12 years (from ~30% to ~60%) averaged over 12 years, 48.6% of the retired GEO spacecraft were properly re-orbited, 29.6% were insufficiently re-orbited, and 21.8% were abandonned in the GEO ring H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 9

Orbit Control Status vs. Satellite Age H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 10

Conclusions within 3 years the risk of catastrophic collisions for ESA satellites in low Earth orbits has increased twofold; evasive maneuvers for ESA satellites increased to 9 per year, with up to 4 per spacecraft the ratio of IADC compliant vs. non-compliant GEO disposals has improved from 1/3 to 2/3 over the past 12 years (with more room for improvement); ESA s Classification of Geosynchronous Objects, Issue 13, will be released in March 2011; electronic copies can be requested from tim.flohrer@esa.int routine, operational surveillance and tracking capabilities are mandatory to maintain a reliable, actionable space situational awareness (SSA) picture; ESA has started to develop corresponding capabilities as part of a European SSA preparatory program space debris mitigation is a necessary, but insufficient step to maintain a sustainable use of outer space; it must soon be accompanied by space debris environment remediation (mass removal), particularly in the LEO regime; ESA supports the UNCOPUOS WG on the Long-term Sustainability of Outer Space Activities H. Klinkrad, ESA, Feb 2011, page 11