O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

Similar documents
Practical Design to Eurocode 2. The webinar will start at 12.30

Bending and Shear in Beams

Erratum. Chapter 4 - Earth and water pressure 26. Chapter Area loads. q a. c+d ϕ'/2. Piling Handbook, 9th edition (2016)

Concise Eurocode 2 25 February 2010

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Assignment 1 - actions

CRACK FORMATION AND CRACK PROPAGATION INTO THE COMPRESSION ZONE ON REINFORCED CONCRETE BEAM STRUCTURES

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

Introduction to The Design Example and EN Basis of Design

CE5510 Advanced Structural Concrete Design - Design & Detailing of Openings in RC Flexural Members-

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

RETAINING WALL ANALYSIS

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Serviceability Limit States

Reinforced Concrete Structures

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Practical Design to Eurocode 2

Einführung des EC2 in Belgien The introduction of EC2 in Belgium

Entrance exam Master Course

10/14/2011. Types of Shear Failure. CASE 1: a v /d 6. a v. CASE 2: 2 a v /d 6. CASE 3: a v /d 2

Clayey sand (SC)

EUROCODE EN SEISMIC DESIGN OF BRIDGES

NAGY GYÖRGY Tamás Assoc. Prof, PhD

Seminar Worked examples on Bridge Design with Eurocodes

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Neutral Axis Depth for a Reinforced Concrete Section. Under Eccentric Axial Load

Seismic Pushover Analysis Using AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design

Worked examples. Dr. Bernd Schuppener German Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute, Karlsruhe Past Chairman of CEN TC250/SC 7

Design Example 2.2. Pad foundation with inclined eccentric load on boulder clay

Annex - R C Design Formulae and Data

9.5 Compression Members

DESIGN OF DOWELS FOR SHEAR TRANSFER AT THE INTERFACE BETWEEN CONCRETE CAST AT DIFFERENT TIMES: A CASE STUDY

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Prepared by Engr. John Paul Timola

Pre-stressed concrete = Pre-compression concrete Pre-compression stresses is applied at the place when tensile stress occur Concrete weak in tension

- Rectangular Beam Design -

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Department of Mechanics, Materials and Structures English courses Reinforced Concrete Structures Code: BMEEPSTK601. Lecture no. 6: SHEAR AND TORSION

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Strengthening of columns with FRP

DESIGN OF STAIRCASE. Dr. Izni Syahrizal bin Ibrahim. Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Standardisation of UHPC in Germany

RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING STRUCTURES

Reinforced concrete structures II. 4.5 Column Design

five Mechanics of Materials 1 ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES: FORM, BEHAVIOR, AND DESIGN DR. ANNE NICHOLS SUMMER 2017 lecture

Foundation Engineering Prof. Dr N.K. Samadhiya Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Lecture-04 Design of RC Members for Shear and Torsion

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

Design of RC Sections with Single Reinforcement according to EC2-1-1 and the Rectangular Stress Distribution

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS Sample Problem 4.2

Chapter. Materials. 1.1 Notations Used in This Chapter

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

Characteristic Cylinder Strength. Characteristic axial tensile strength of concrete. coefficient related to bond condition

D1. A normally consolidated clay has the following void ratio e versus effective stress σ relationship obtained in an oedometer test.

Improving fire resistance of existing concrete slabs by concrete topping

3.2 Reinforced Concrete Slabs Slabs are divided into suspended slabs. Suspended slabs may be divided into two groups:

Customer: Job No.: Date: Subject: Reinforcement Design for RVK 101. = psi. = psi 1.5. Use #4 Rebar. = 335.

1. ARRANGEMENT. a. Frame A1-P3. L 1 = 20 m H = 5.23 m L 2 = 20 m H 1 = 8.29 m L 3 = 20 m H 2 = 8.29 m H 3 = 8.39 m. b. Frame P3-P6

Eurocode Training EN : Reinforced Concrete

Composite bridge design (EN1994-2) Bridge modelling and structural analysis

SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATE DESIGN

The European Concrete Platform ASBL, May 2008.

6. Bending CHAPTER OBJECTIVES

CHAPTER 4: BENDING OF BEAMS

PURE BENDING. If a simply supported beam carries two point loads of 10 kn as shown in the following figure, pure bending occurs at segment BC.

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 2. Introduction

DESIGN AND DETAILING OF COUNTERFORT RETAINING WALL

UNIT-I STRESS, STRAIN. 1. A Member A B C D is subjected to loading as shown in fig determine the total elongation. Take E= 2 x10 5 N/mm 2

Visit Abqconsultants.com. This program Designs and Optimises RCC Chimney and Foundation. Written and programmed

Andrew Bond 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Eurocode 7, Pavia, Italy, April 2010

Example 2.2 [Ribbed slab design]

Concrete and Masonry Structures 1 Office hours

GATE SOLUTIONS E N G I N E E R I N G

Eurocode 7 from soil mechanics to rock mechanics. Luís Lamas, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal Didier Virely, CEREMA, Toulouse, France

INTI COLLEGE MALAYSIA

UNIT II SHALLOW FOUNDATION

Analysis of Damaged Concrete Columns of Circular Cross-Section

D : SOLID MECHANICS. Q. 1 Q. 9 carry one mark each.

2012 MECHANICS OF SOLIDS

Special edition paper

Unit III Theory of columns. Dr.P.Venkateswara Rao, Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg., SVCE, Sriperumbudir

[8] Bending and Shear Loading of Beams

The Concepts of Eurocode 7 for Harmonised Geotechnical Design in Europe

CHAPTER 4. Design of R C Beams

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Seismic design of bridges

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

Flexure: Behavior and Nominal Strength of Beam Sections

Chapter 8. Shear and Diagonal Tension

CHAPTER 6: ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

CHAPTER 4. ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COLUMNS

Design of a Multi-Storied RC Building

ENG2000 Chapter 7 Beams. ENG2000: R.I. Hornsey Beam: 1

Transcription:

DECODING EUROCODES 2 + 7: DESIGN SG OF FOUNDATIONS O Dr Andrew Bond (Geocentrix)

Outline of talk April 2010: the death of British Standards? UK implementation of Eurocodes Verification of strength: limit states STR and GEO Some technical pitfalls Guidance on use of Eurocodes

APRIL 2010: THE DEATH OF BRITISH STANDARDS?

British Standards for foundations prior to April 2010 Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 4

European design standards for foundations (Eurocodes) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 5

European specifications for materials (and testing standards) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 6

European execution standards Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 7

UK IMPLEMENTATION OF EUROCODES

The Eurocode family BON ND AND HARRIS (2008) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 3+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and The Steel Construction Institute Ltd 9

Role of Eurocodes in UK practice BON ND AND HARRIS (2008) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 3+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and The Steel Construction Institute Ltd 10

BSI Published Documents to support the Eurocodes Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 11

De facto UK standards for basement design Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 12

VERIFICATION OF STRENGTH: LIMIT STATES S STR AND GEO

Verification of strength Verification of strength is expressed in Eurocode 7 by: E d R E d = design effect of actions R d = design resistance corresponding to that effect Applies to GEO: Failure or excessive deformation of the ground, in which the strength of soil or rock is significant in providing resistance d EN 1997 1 2.4.7.1(1)P EN 1997 1 2.4 4.7.1(1 1)P and to STR: Internal failure or excessive deformation of the structure or structural elements in which the strength of structural materials is significant in providing resistance EN 1997 1 2.4.7.1(1)P Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 14

Application of partial factors and tolerances Actions F = γ F d F rep Material properties X = d X γ k M Effects of actions {,, } E = γ E F X a d E d d d Resistances R { F X a } Geometrical parameters,, d d d a = a ±Δa d nom R d = γ R Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 15

Verification of strength for STR (structural design) BON ND AND HARRIS (2008) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 16

Verification of strength for GEO/STR (DA1 1) BON ND AND HARRIS (2008) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 17

Verification of strength for GEO/STR (DA1 2) BON ND AND HARRIS (2008) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 18

Partial factors for GEO/STR (DA1): footings, walls, and slopes Parameter Symbol Combination 1 Combination 2 A1 M1 R1 A2 M2 R1 Permanent Unfavourable γ G 135 1.35 10 1.0 action (G) Favourable (γ G,fav ) 1.0 Variable Unfavourable γ Q 1.5 1.3 action (Q) Favourable (0) (0) Shearing resistance (tan ϕ) γ ϕ 1.0 1.25 Effective cohesion (c ) Undrained shear strength (c u ) γ cu 1.4 Unconfined compressive strength (q u ) Weight density (γ) γ γ 1.0 γ c γ qu Bearing resistance (R v ) γ Rv 1.0 1.0 Sliding resistance (R h ) Earth resistance (R e ) γ Rh γ Re Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 19

SOME TECHNICAL DETAILS

Design strength of concrete Design compressive strength of concrete is: f = α f γ cd cc ck c f ck = characteristic compressive strength of concrete (from cylinder tests) γ c = partial factor for concrete in compression α cc = factor for long term effects on compressive strength and unfavourable effects resulting from the way the load is applied Design tensile strength of concrete is: f f f 23 ctd = αct ctk,0.05 γc = 0.21 αct ck γc f ctk,0.05 05 = characteristic tensile strength of concrete (5% fractile value) α ct = factor for long term effects on tensile strength, etc. [f ck has units of MPa in this expression] EN 1992 1 1 EX XP (3.15 5 3.16 ) & TA BLE 3.1 Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 21

Design strength of reinforcing steel Design yield strength of reinforcing steel is: f = f γ yd yk s f yk = characteristic yield strength of reinforcing steel γ s = partial factor for reinforcing steel EN 1992 1 1 3 3.2.7(2 2) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 22

Factor for long term effects on concrete strength Document Reinforced concrete Plain/lightly reinforced conc. Compression Tension Compression Tension α cc α ct α cc,pl α ct,pl EN 1992 1 1 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 UK NA (Amd 1) 085flexure/axial 0.85 10 1.0 06 0.6 08 0.8 1.0 otherwise Long vs short term strength Justification for α cc = 0.85 EN 1992 1 1 3 3.1.6 & PD 66 687 Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 23

Partial factors for reinforced concrete Limit states Design situation Reinforced concrete Reinforcing and prestressing steel General Piles* γ s γ c Ultimate Persistent 1.5 1.65 1.15 k f γ c Transient 1.5 1.65 1.15 Accidental 1.2 1.32 1.0 Seismic 1.0 1.0 1.0 Serviceability 1.0 1.0 1.0 *Cast in place piles without permanent casing; k f = 11 1.1 Recommended value for situations not explicitly covered by EN 1992 EN 1992 1 1 2 2.4.2.4 4 & 2.4 4.2.5 Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 24

Bending resistance of singly reinforced beam Verification of bending resistance requires: M Ed M Rd M Ed = design value of applied bending moment effect M Rd = design bending resistance, given by: M Rd A s = area of steel reinforcement fydas = Af s ydd 1 2η fcd bd f yd = design yield ildstrength of reinforcing i steel b= width of cross section; d = its effective depth f cd = design compressive strength of concrete η = 1.0 Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 25

Design chats for singly reinforced beams 0.3 9 0.28 0.26 8 / bd^2fcd K = M / 024 0.24 0.22 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.1 0.08 006 0.06 0.04 0.02 M / bd^ ^2 (MPa) 7 6 5 4 fck = 50 MPa 45 MPa 3 40 MPa 35 MPa 2 30 MPa 1 25 MPa 20 MPa 0 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 0.2 0.24 0.28 0.32 0.36 (As / bd) (fyd/fcd) d) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 As / bd (%) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 26

Differences between design aids Design aids for Eurocode 2 that have appeared to date present N:M interaction diagrams in subtly different ways: Author/Guide Axes Contours TT Designer s Guide Concrete Centre TCC Spreadsheets N M A f vs 2 hf hf hf Ed Ed 2 3 cd hfcd N M vs 2 hf hf Ed Ed 2 3 ck ck s yd hf cd Asfyk hf ck N Ed ( kn ) vs M Ed ( knm ) A s (e.g. 4B32) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 27

Truss model for variable strut inclination method EN 1992 1 1 6.2.3(1) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 28

Design charts for shear resistance 1 0.9 08 0.8 8 7 21.8 8 7 (MPa) vrd.c 0.7 0.6 2% 05 0.5 1.75% 1.5% 0.4 1.25% 0.3 1.0% 0.75% 02 0.2 05% 0.5% 0.1 0.25% 0.15% 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 Effective depth (mm) tance (MPa) Shear resist 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 20 25 30 35 40 45 Truss angle (deg) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 29

Assumptions used to develop N:M interaction charts Reinforcing bars are (rotationally) symmetrical about the pile centre Aboveneutralaxis axis, concrete andreinforcingbarsprovidecompression compression force Below neutral axis, only reinforcing bars provide tension Shape of concrete in compression = segment of circle; must deduct area of steel in compression zone from it Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 30

Circular pile (D = 600 mm, c = 75 mm, φ l = 32 mm, φ t = 8 mm) PILE INTERACTION DIAGRAM

Feltham (2004), paper in The Structural Engineer d v z β Area of concrete strut 2r s /π Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 32

Comparing minimum reinforcement for concrete piles 40 Minimum longitudinal reinforcement for concrete piles A c.en1992,max m 2 30 As (cm^2 2) 20 10 EN 1536 (bored piles) BD 74/00 (bored piles) EN 14199 (driven cast-in-place) EN 14199 (micropiles) Minimum for column (EN 1992) Maximum for column (EN 1992) EN 1992 (bored piles) 0 025 0.25 05 0.5 075 0.75 1 125 1.25 15 1.5 Ac (m^2) Oct-10 Decoding Eurocodes 2+7 2010 Geocentrix Ltd and Modulus Structural Engineering Ltd 33

GUIDANCE ON USE OF EUROCODES

Guidance from SCI/BCSA/Corus/Concrete Centre 27 October 2010 http://www.steel-ncci.co.uk/

Designers Guides, Decoding book and blog WW WW.EUROCODE7.COM Oct-10 Decoding the Structural Eurocodes 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 36

Decoding training courses from Geocentrix WW WW.GEOCENTRIX.CO.UK/TRAINING Oct-10 Decoding Eurocode 7 2005-10 Geocentrix Ltd. All rights reserved 37

JACK OFFORD (WITH APOLOGIES TO MUNCH) The Eurocode Scream Oct-10 April 2010 - the death of British Standards 38

FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT. Eurocode 7 training: www.geocentrix.co.uk Eurocode 7 book: www.decodingeurocode7.com Eurocode 7 blog: www.eurocode7.com