Supporting Information

Similar documents
Vulnerability of Bangladesh to Cyclones in a Changing Climate

TABLE I SUMMARY STATISTICS a

PRE MONSOON TROPICAL CYCLONE ALERT (LAILA)

Development from Representation? A Study of Quotas for the Scheduled Castes in India. Online Appendix

Sea Level Rise and Hurricane Florence storm surge research methodology

RISK OF PRINCIPAL DISASTERS IN INDIA AND IMPACTS OF DISASTERS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

Notes On: Do Television and Radio Destroy Social Capital? Evidence from Indonesian Village (Olken 2009)

A Review of Concept of Peri-urban Area & Its Identification

Paper Reference. Paper Reference(s) 1312/4H Edexcel GCSE Geography A Higher Tier. Monday 11 June 2007 Afternoon Time: 1 hour 15 minutes

APPLICATION OF REMOTE SENSING & GIS ON LANDSLIDE HAZARD ZONE IDENTIFICATION & MANAGEMENT

Households or locations? Cities, catchment areas and prosperity in India

Use of Geospatial data for disaster managements

A Hurricane Outlook for the 21st Century.

Tropical Cyclone Sandy (AL182012)

Prepared by: Ryan Ratcliffe GPH-903 December 10, 2011

IMPACTS OF SEA LEVEL RISE in Bangkok, Thailand

Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e Case History: Indonesian Tsunami Indonesian Tsunami (2) Introduction Historic Tsunamis

Vietnam Coastal Erosion - Cause and Challenges -

APPENDIX TABLE 1 Expansion of the National Malaria Control Program Population protected. # Units established (cumulative)

Chapter 6. Fundamentals of GIS-Based Data Analysis for Decision Support. Table 6.1. Spatial Data Transformations by Geospatial Data Types

Vulnerability Assessment of Cyclonic Hazards in Coastal Region of Bangladesh

Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Contextualizing-Riots:-Changing-Explanations-of-Political-Violence-in-India,- 1971>2000!

Proposal Report On Flood Hazards Mapping Project In Xebangfai River

Cities in Bad Shape: Urban Geometry in India

Montserrat Eruption = Monster rat

E Geographic Information System. Created By: Freda Rocker Pearl River County Mapping

Techniques for Science Teachers: Using GIS in Science Classrooms.

Georeferencing and Satellite Image Support: Lessons learned, Challenges and Opportunities

Compact guides GISCO. Geographic information system of the Commission

Maggie M. Kovach. Department of Geography University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Outline. Remote Sensing, GIS and DEM Applications for Flood Monitoring. Introduction. Satellites and their Sensors used for Flood Mapping

Use Eaton Kortum model to look at very cool data

Use of administrative registers for strengthening the geostatistical framework of the Census of Agriculture in Mexico

Paper Reference. Paper Reference(s) 1312/2F Edexcel GCSE Geography A Foundation Tier. Monday 11 June 2007 Afternoon Time: 1 hour 15 minutes

Hydrologic Modelling of the Upper Malaprabha Catchment using ArcView SWAT

COMMUNITY SERVICE AREA

Farah Nusrat NRS 509: Concepts in GIS & Remote Sensing Due Date: December 15, 2016

The Tampa Bay Catastrophic Plan Presentation to CFGIS Users Group FDOT District 5 Urban Offices - Orlando July 30, 2010

Sri Lanka Enhancing the Role of ICTs for Disaster Risk Management

The AIR Tropical Cyclone Model for India

Modeling Storm Surge for Emergency Management

Progress Report. Flood Hazard Mapping in Thailand

THE NEW STORM SURGE MODULE IN AIR S U.S. HURRICANE MODEL

Apéndice 1: Figuras y Tablas del Marco Teórico

International Journal of Computing and Business Research (IJCBR) ISSN (Online) : APPLICATION OF GIS IN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT

Environmental Impact Assessment Land Use and Land Cover CISMHE 7.1 INTRODUCTION

Urban Expansion and Loss of Agricultural Land: A Remote Sensing Based Study of Shirpur City, Maharashtra

Journal of Telecommunications System & Management

UK NEA Economic Analysis Report Cultural services: Mourato et al. 2010

Excel Geomatics. Rajesh Paul Excel Geomatics Pvt. Ltd., Noida February, 2015 India Geospatial Forum, Hyderabad

Summary Visualizations for Coastal Spatial Temporal Dynamics

Exposure Disaggregation: Introduction. By Alissa Le Mon

Raster Spatial Analysis Specific Theory

Politician Family Networks and Electoral Outcomes: Evidence from the Philippines. Online Appendix. Cesi Cruz, Julien Labonne, and Pablo Querubin

1. Introduction. S.S. Patil 1, Sachidananda 1, U.B. Angadi 2, and D.K. Prabhuraj 3

Urban Hydrology - A Case Study On Water Supply And Sewage Network For Madurai Region, Using Remote Sensing & GIS Techniques

Status and Challenges on Geo-DRM Information Systems in Tonga

A Method for Mapping Settlement Area Boundaries in the Greater Golden Horseshoe

7.1 INTRODUCTION 7.2 OBJECTIVE

Quick Response Report #126 Hurricane Floyd Flood Mapping Integrating Landsat 7 TM Satellite Imagery and DEM Data

W.B (pp126) 1. Why does cold air sink and hot air rise? When air is heated it expands, becomes lighter and goes up. Cold air is denser and heavy.

Understanding China Census Data with GIS By Shuming Bao and Susan Haynie China Data Center, University of Michigan

Contents. Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 2 Cyclones Chapter 3 Hurricanes Chapter 4 Tornadoes... 36

How GIS can be used for improvement of literacy and CE programmes

Developing a Community Geographical Information System (GIS) in Rural India

Terrain Analysis through Maps.

ILO Assessment Report: Community Based Emergency Employment Nabulini, Manu and Naibita Village.

MAP STUDY: INTERPRETATION OF SURVEY MAPS

ANALYZING CITIES & POPULATION: POPULATION GEOGRAPHY

10/13/2011. Introduction. Introduction to GPS and GIS Workshop. Schedule. What We Will Cover

Untitled.notebook May 12, Thunderstorms. Moisture is needed to form clouds and precipitation the lifting of air, or uplift, must be very strong

UNITED NATIONS E/CONF.97/6/IP. 33

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

Geospatial SDI Portal for effective Governance of Pune METROPOLIS region

Flood Hazard Vulnerability Mapping Using Remote Sensing and GIS: A Case Study of Surat Dhruvesh KM 1*, Praful MU 2 and Aditya MV 1 1

Current Status of Vietnam Coastal Erosion and Major Measures for Mitigation

Valuation of environmental amenities in urban land price: A case study in the Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia

Report. Developing a course component on disaster management

Flooding on the Somerset Levels. ArcGIS Online

DISASTER INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Sri Lanka

Information. Information Technology. Geographic. Services (GIS) 119 W Indiana Ave Deland, FL 32720

LAND USE LAND COVER, CHANGE DETECTION OF FOREST IN KARWAR TALUK USING GEO-SPATIAL TECHNIQUES

CENSUS MAPPING WITH GIS IN NAMIBIA. BY Mrs. Ottilie Mwazi Central Bureau of Statistics Tel: October 2007

Applying Hazard Maps to Urban Planning

Assessing the Regional Vulnerability of Large Scale Mining in Ghana: An Application of Multi Criteria Analysis

Chapter 6: Writing the News Story in Simple Steps

5. MANY COASTAL COMMUNITIES AND FACILITIES WILL FACE INCREASING EXPOSURE TO STORMS.

GNSS and Its Applications in the context of Bangladesh

Application of Remote Sensing Techniques for Change Detection in Land Use/ Land Cover of Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra

Role of Hydro-Met Services in Disaster Risk Management

Exercise 2: Working with Vector Data in ArcGIS 9.3

Add NOAA nowcoast Layers to Maps

Geospatial Analysis of Rural Weekly Markets: A Case Study of Bemetara District of Chhattisgarh, India

EFFECT OF WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME IN GUDHA GOKALPURA VILLAGE, BUNDI DISTRICT, RAJASTHAN - A REMOTE SENSING STUDY

Tropical Update. 5 AM EDT Tuesday, September 12, 2017 Post-Tropical Cyclone Irma, Hurricane Jose, & Tropical Wave (10%)

Planning for coastal hazards in a changing climate

Pacific Catastrophe Risk Assessment And Financing Initiative

SLOSH New Orleans Basin 2012 Update

HURRICANE MATTHEW A GIS PERSPECTIVE GLYNN COUNTY GIS

Transcription:

Supporting Information Das and Vincent 10.1073/pnas.0810440106 Table S1. Definitions and data sources for variables Variable Description Source Human deaths Number of deaths per village during the cyclone Emergency Office, Kendrapada, Government of Orissa Village population Estimated number of residents Interpolated from estimates for 1991 and 2001 reported in the Primary Census Abstract of the State of Orissa 1999 mangrove width Distance (in km) between the coast and the interior boundary of the forest along the shortest distance from a village to the coast 1944 mangrove width Distance (in km) between the coast and the 1944 interior boundary of the forest along the shortest distance from a village to the coast Height of storm surge Height of storm surge (in m) along the coast, at the shortest distance from a village Low elevation 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if a village was located within the 1944 or 1999 mangrove boundary and 0 otherwise Casuarina buffer 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if there was a casuarina buffer between a village and the coast and 0 otherwise Seawater dike 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if there was a seawater dike in a village and 0 otherwise Forest boundary based on October 11, 1999, images from the LISS-III Pan sensor of Indian satellite IRS-1D Forest boundary based on 1:250,000 U.S. Army map (NF 45 14 Series U502, Cuttack sheet) Surge envelope curve constructed by the Indian Meteorological Department (1) Same as for 1944 and 1999 mangrove widths Same as 1999 mangrove width GIS files purchased from Digital Cartography and Services, Bhubaneswar, Orissa Distance from coast Minimum distance between a village and the coast Same as seawater dike Distance from major river Minimum distance between a village and a river that Same as seawater dike flowed directly into the sea Distance from minor river Minimum distance between a village and a tributary of Same as seawater dike a major river Distance from nearest road Minimum distance between a village and a metallic Same as seawater dike road Literacy rate Fraction of village residents who were literate Same as for village population Scheduled caste Fraction of village residents who were members of a Same as for village population scheduled caste Cultivator Fraction of village residents employed as cultivators Same as for village population (farmers) Agricultural laborer Fraction of village residents employed as agricultural Same as for village population laborers Worker in home industry Fraction of village residents self-employed in Same as for village population businesses operated out of their homes Marginal worker Fraction of village residents employed as casual Same as for village population laborers Other worker Fraction of village residents employed in all other Same as for village population occupations (teacher, doctor, etc.) Tahasil: Marshagai 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if a village was located Primary Census Abstract of the State of Orissa in Marshagai tahasil and 0 otherwise Tahasil: Patamundai 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if a village was located Primary Census Abstract of the State of Orissa in Patamundai tahasil and 0 otherwise Tahasil: Rajnagar 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if a village was located Primary Census Abstract of the State of Orissa in Rajnagar tahasil and 0 otherwise Tahasil: Mahakalpada 0 1 dummy variable, equal to 1 if a village was located in Mahakalpada tahasil and 0 otherwise. Note: This variable was excluded from the regression models to avoid perfect colinearity between the tahasil variables and the regression constant. Primary Census Abstract of the State of Orissa Unless otherwise noted, all estimates are for 1999. Village and district boundaries and many other spatial variables were based on GIS files purchased from a private source (Digital Cartography and Services, Bhubaneswar, Orissa). Distances were calculated using ArcView 3.2. 1. Kalsi SR, Jayanthi N, Roy Bhowmik SK (2004) A Review of Different Storm Surge Models and Estimated Storm Surge Height in Respect of Orissa Supercyclonic Storm of 29 October, 1999 (Indian Meteorological Department, New Delhi). 1of10

Table S2. Number of deaths caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India: Villages in area affected by storm surge in Kendrapada District Village-level deaths Sample No. villages No. villages with no deaths Mean SD Minimum Maximum All villages 409 307 0.63 1.81 0 21 Villages within 10 km of coast 154 116 0.77 2.04 0 13 Villages beyond 10 km of coast 255 191 0.54 1.66 0 21 2of10

Table S3. Coefficient and standard error estimates from multivariate regression models of deaths caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India: Sample includes all 409 villages in area affected by storm surge in Kendrapada District Model Variable Only 1999 mangrove width and population Add 1944 mangrove width Add height of storm surge Add topography variables Add distance variables Add socioeconomic characteristics Add government administration 1999 mangrove width 0.631 (0.187)*** 0.515 (0.174)*** 0.524 (0.183)*** 0.519 (0.141)*** 0.507 (0.148)*** 0.505 (0.149)*** 0.485 (0.163)*** Village population 0.000335 (0.0000904)*** 0.000384 (0.0000916)*** 0.000390 (0.0000982)*** 0.000200 (0.0000919)** 0.000207 (0.0000931)** 0.000253 (0.0000982)*** 0.000198 (0.000102)* 1944 mangrove 0.0862 (0.0351)** 0.0886 0.104 0.0628 0.0748 0.0880 (0.0564) width (0.0377)** (0.0374)*** (0.0404) (0.0411)* Height of storm 0.0143 0.126 (0.0786) 0.140 (0.0890) 0.156 (0.0925)* 0.0502 (0.111) surge (0.0824) Low elevation 1.54 1.16 1.12 (0.393)*** 1.22 (0.405)*** (0.270)*** (0.349)*** Casuarina buffer 0.650 0.576 0.466 (0.284)* 0.286 (0.304) (0.271)** (0.270)** Seawater dike 0.130 0.294 0.309 (0.249) 0.370 (0.257) (0.245) (0.248) Distance from 0.0171 0.0147 0.0145 (0.0240) coast (0.0196) (0.0204) Distance from 0.0199 0.0109 0.0129 (0.0427) major river (0.0364) (0.0368) Distance from 0.174 0.183 0.146 (0.0841)* minor river (0.0761)** (0.0814)** Distance from 0.0615 0.0422 (0.0485) 0.0406 (0.0488) nearest road (0.0463) Literacy rate 0.364 (1.33) 0.317 (1.33) Scheduled caste 1.14 (0.909) 0.843 (0.913) Cultivator 0.271 (1.12) 0.599 (1.13) Agricultural 3.22 (2.09) 3.14 (2.07) laborer Worker in home 9.90 (14.0) 9.21 (13.8) industry Marginal worker 1.29 (1.26) 0.676 (1.31) Other worker 2.23 (3.22) 1.54 (3.23) Tahasil: Marshagai 0.635 (0.748) Tahasil: 0.625 (0.511) Patamundai Tahasil: Rajnagar 0.447 (0.465) Constant 0.356 (0.240) 0.980 (0.346)*** 0.965 (0.358)*** 1.52 (0.401)*** 0.745 (0.608) 1.05 (1.08) 0.671 (1.09) Dependent variable is village-level number of deaths. All models were estimated using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, with population used to adjust for the inflated number of villages with zero deaths. Standard errors are shown in parentheses beside or beneath coefficient estimates. Significance levels: ***1%, **5%, *10%. 3of10

Table S4. Coefficient and standard error estimates from multivariate regression model of deaths caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India: Coefficient on population and regression constant allowed to differ between villages within 10 km of coast and villages beyond 10 km of coast Variable Coefficient estimate (standard error) 1999 mangrove width 0.587 (0.191)*** Population: villages within 10 km 0.000397 (0.000122)*** Population: villages beyond 10 km 0.0000986 (0.000145) 1944 mangrove width 0.0330 (0.0542) Height of storm surge 0.0271 (0.105) Low elevation 1.29 (0.383)*** Casuarina buffer 0.115 (0.285) Seawater dike 0.394 (0.254) Distance from coast 0.0282 (0.0268) Distance from major river 0.0180 (0.0428) Distance from minor river 0.135 (0.0806)* Distance from nearest road 0.0708 (0.0476) Literacy rate 0.385 (1.25) Scheduled caste 0.828 (0.879) Cultivator 1.25 (1.01) Agricultural laborer 4.75 (2.02)** Worker in home industry 0.788 (12.8) Marginal worker 1.61 (1.31) Other worker 1.90 (3.12) Tahasil: Marshagai 1.19 (0.762) Tahasil: Patamundai 0.832 (0.526) Tahasil: Rajnagar 0.538 (0.460) Constant 1.19 (1.14) Village located within 10 km of coast 1.98 (0.530)*** Dependent variable is village-level number of deaths. Sample includes all 409 villages in area affected by storm surge in Kendrapada District. All models were estimated using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, with population used to adjust for the inflated number of villages with zero deaths. Significance levels: ***1%, **5%, *10%. 4of10

Table S5. Estimated impact of government warning issued to villages within 10 km of coast in advance of October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India Step in calculation Result Predicted mean number of deaths per village within 10 km of the coast ( mean of fitted values from regression model in Table S4) Coefficient on dummy variable for villages within 10 km of the coast (from regression model in Table S4) Ratio of number of deaths per village within 10 km of the coast to number of deaths per village beyond 10 km, controlling for all observable village characteristics Predicted mean number of deaths per village within 10 km of the coast, in absence of government warning 0.808 1.98 0.138 ( e 1.98 ) 5.84 ( 0.808/0.138) Calculations are for subsample of 154 villages within 10 km of coast, in area affected by storm surge in Kendrapada District. 5of10

Table S6. Coefficient and standard error estimates from multivariate regression model of damage caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India: Dependent variable changed from village-level deaths to village-level number of damaged houses Type of house damage Variable All damage Most severe damage 1999 mangrove width 99.1 (77.9) 12.3 (30.8) Population: villages within 10 km 0.148 (0.0399)*** 0.146 (0.0208)*** Population: villages beyond 10 km 0.243 (0.0474)*** 0.150 (0.0361)*** 1944 mangrove width 4.35 (10.3) 0.0806 (7.03) Height of storm surge 1.67 (15.3) 4.06 (13.8) Low elevation 6.49 (60.9) 0.754 (40.0) Casuarina buffer 47.9 (87.6) 32.4 (67.6) Seawater dike 23.2 (49.9) 23.0 (40.1) Distance from coast 12.5 (8.33) 7.54 (5.67) Distance from major river 2.60 (12.5) 4.93 (11.0) Distance from minor river 4.17 (14.8) 6.83 (11.4) Distance from nearest road 4.82 (10.5) 2.86 (5.85) Literacy rate 10.3 (183) 48.1 (129) Scheduled caste 56.5 (132) 67.8 (104) Cultivator 1005 (503)** 615 (379)* Agricultural laborer 1729 (893)* 930 (644) Worker in home industry 991 (6692) 343 (5104) Marginal worker 8.16 (224) 53.2 (194) Other worker 548 (964) 711 (671) Tahasil: Marshaghai 196 (287) 228 (208) Tahasil: Patamundai 168 (222) 176 (157) Tahasil: Rajnagar 873 (331)*** 1051 (180)*** Constant 432 (241)* 304 (160)* Village located within 10 km of coast 2.36 (89.5) 38.4 (58.4) Most severe damage refers to houses that were completely destroyed; All damage adds in the number of houses that were damaged but not destroyed. Sample includes 147 gram panchayats and villages in area affected by storm surge in Kendrapada District. (In some areas, house damage was reported at the gram panchayat level, not the village level.) The coefficient on population and the regression constant were allowed to differ between villages within 10 km of coast and villages beyond 10 km of coast. All models were estimated using ordinary least squares regression. Robust (Huber-White sandwich) standard errors are shown in parentheses beside coefficient estimates. Significance levels: ***1%, **5%, *10%. 6of10

Table S7. Coefficient and standard error estimates from multivariate regression models of deaths caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India: Interaction between mangrove and storm surge Model Variable Base model (no interaction) Add interaction with height of storm surge Drop 1999 mangrove width Split interaction term for smaller and larger storm surges 1999 mangrove width 1.64(0.394)*** 0.347 (0.905) 1999 mangrove width Height of storm surge 1.24 (0.839) 1.54 (0.345)*** 1999 mangrove width 1.85 (0.588)*** Below-mean height of storm surge 1999 mangrove width 1.36 (0.429)*** Above-mean height of storm surge Village population 0.000610 (0.0000898)*** 0.000590 (0.0000881)*** 0.000584 (0.0000864)*** 0.000589 (0.0000870)*** 1944 mangrove width 0.552 (0.142)*** 0.545 (0.144)*** 0.535 (0.141)*** 0.559 (0.146)*** Height of storm surge 0.255 (0.149)* 0.620 (0.289)** 0.705 (0.196)*** 0.628 (0.220)*** Low elevation 2.40 (0.598)*** 2.49 (0.621)*** 2.49 (0.624)*** 2.50 (0.621)*** Casuarina buffer 0.500 (0.415) 1.04 (0.579)* 1.18 (0.483)** 0.974 (0.553)* Seawater dike 0.0472 (0.376) 0.0616 (0.369) 0.0542 (0.367) 0.110 (0.382) Distance from coast 0.531 (0.148)*** 0.504 (0.150)*** 0.490 (0.146)*** 0.522 (0.153)*** Distance from major river 0.190 (0.115)* 0.208 (0.113)* 0.212 (0.112)* 0.208 (0.113)* Distance from minor river 0.120 (0.108) 0.114 (0.108) 0.109 (0.107) 0.126 (0.110) Distance from nearest road 0.0102 (0.0588) 0.0386 (0.0672) 0.0478 (0.0633) 0.0273 (0.0696) Literacy rate 3.40 (1.20)*** 3.08 (1.23)** 2.98 (1.20)** 3.24 (1.25)** Scheduled caste 3.24 (1.73)* 3.28 (1.70)* 3.27 (1.69)* 3.29 (1.70)* Cultivator 0.196 (1.15) 0.178 (1.17) 0.195 (1.17) 0.161 (1.16) Agricultural laborer 3.99 (1.65)** 5.09 (1.97)*** 5.21 (1.99)*** 5.01 (1.94)*** Worker in home industry 4.16 (31.6) 5.66 (31.3) 6.87 (31.1) 4.45 (31.4) Marginal worker 3.68 (1.31)*** 3.84 (1.35)*** 3.86 (1.36)*** 3.80 (1.34)*** Other worker 2.61 (2.98) 2.35 (2.98) 2.22 (2.96) 2.43 (2.97) Tahasil: Patamundai 3.20 (1.17)*** 3.51 (1.20)*** 3.56 (1.20)*** 3.50 (1.20)*** Tahasil: Rajnagar 0.715 (0.502) 1.14 (0.576)** 1.25 (0.500)** 0.996 (0.625) Constant 1.43 (1.24) 1.51 (1.26) 1.57 (1.26) 1.53 (1.25) Dependent variable is village-level number of deaths. Sample includes 154 villages within 10 km of coast, in area affected by storm surge in Kendrapada District. All models were estimated using poisson regression. Dummy variable for Marshagai was dropped because this tahasil is beyond 10 km of coast. Standard errors are shown in parentheses beside coefficient estimates. Significance levels: ***1%, **5%, *10%. 7of10

Table S8. Coefficient and standard error estimates from multivariate regression models of deaths caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India: Add distance from cyclone path Variable Full sample of 409 villages Subsample of 154 villages Distance from cyclone path 0.00817 (0.0272) 0.0441 (0.0517) 1999 mangrove width 0.477 (0.163)*** 1999 mangrove width below-mean height of 1.73 (0.612)*** storm surge 1999 mangrove width above-mean height of 1.26 (0.430)*** storm surge Village population 0.000204 (0.000104)** 0.000607 (0.0000916)*** 1944 mangrove width 0.0860 (0.0568) 0.543 (0.147)*** Height of storm surge 0.0717 (0.132) 0.626 (0.220)*** Low elevation 1.17 (0.434)*** 2.28 (0.653)*** Casuarina buffer 0.303 (0.309) 0.677 (0.643) Seawater dike 0.367 (0.257) 0.109 (0.385) Distance from coast 0.0115 (0.0260) 0.536 (0.156)*** Distance from major river 0.0159 (0.0437) 0.189 (0.117) Distance from minor river 0.145 (0.0841)* 0.132 (0.111) Distance from nearest road 0.0386 (0.0491) 0.0510 (0.0756) Literacy rate 0.279 (1.34) 3.35 (1.28)** Scheduled caste 0.828 (0.914) 3.15 (1.75)* Cultivator 0.572 (1.13) 0.0182 (1.19) Agricultural laborer 2.91 (2.21) 4.51 (2.02)** Worker in home industry 9.96 (14.0) 3.04 (32.0) Marginal worker 0.538 (1.39) 3.66 (1.35)*** Other worker 1.70 (3.27) 2.92 (3.04) Tahasil: Marshagai 0.599 (0.758) Tahasil: Patamundai 0.699 (0.567) 3.68 (1.22)*** Tahasil: Rajnagar 0.693 (0.941) 2.47 (1.86) Constant 0.907 (1.35) 2.75 (1.98) Dependent variable is village-level number of deaths in all models. Subsample refers to villages within 10 km of coast. Model for full sample was estimated using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, with population used to adjust for the inflated number of villages with zero deaths. Model for subsample was estimated using poisson regression, with dummy variable for Marshagai dropped because this tahasil is beyond 10 km of coast. Standard errors are shown in parentheses beside coefficient estimates. Significance levels: ***1%, **5%, *10%. 8of10

Table S9. Estimated average cost of saving a life by retaining 1999 mangrove area in Kendrapada District, Orissa, India Step in calculation Predicted mean number of deaths per village ( mean of fitted values from model in last 0.77 column of Table S7) Predicted mean number of deaths per village, if mangroves had been absent ( mean of 2.49 fitted values from model in last column of Table S7, with 1999 mangrove width 0) Predicted increase in mean number of deaths per village, if mangroves had been absent 1.72 ( 2.49 0.77) Predicted increase in total number of deaths, if mangroves had been absent 265 ( 1.72 154) 1999 mangrove area (hectares) 17,900 Predicted number of averted deaths per hectare of mangrove 0.0148 ( 265/17,900) Average price of agricultural land near mangroves in Kendrapada District in 1999 (rupees per 172,970 hectare) Estimated average cost of saving a life by retaining 1999 mangrove area (rupees per life) 11,667,592 ( 172,970/0.0148) Calculations are for subsample of 154 villages within 10 km of coast, in area affected by storm surge. Result 9of10

Table S10. Alternative standard error estimates from multivariate regression model of deaths caused by October 1999 cyclone in state of Orissa, India Full sample (409 villages) Subsample (154 villages) Variable Robust standard errors Clustered standard errors Robust standard errors Clustered standard errors 1999 mangrove width 0.485 (0.124)*** 0.485 (0.112)*** 1999 mangrove width 1.85 (0.654)*** 1.85 (0.576)*** below-mean height of storm surge 1999 mangrove width 1.36 (0.454)*** 1.36 (0.593)*** above- mean height of storm surge Village population 0.000198 (0.0000949)** 0.000198 (0.000101)* 0.000589 (0.0000713)*** 0.000589 (0.0000700)*** 1944 mangrove width 0.0880 (0.0587) 0.0880 (0.0634) 0.559 (0.154)*** 0.559 (0.140)*** Height of storm surge 0.0502 (0.109) 0.0502 (0.108) 0.628 (0.211)*** 0.628 (0.225)*** Low elevation 1.22 (0.418)*** 1.22 (0.396)*** 2.50 (0.602)*** 2.50 (0.669)*** Casuarina buffer 0.286 (0.381) 0.286 (0.327) 0.974 (0.486)** 0.974 (0.395)** Seawater dike 0.370 (0.239) 0.370 (0.278) 0.110 (0.333) 0.110 (0.312) Distance from coast 0.0145 (0.0247) 0.0145 (0.0265) 0.522 (0.148)*** 0.522 (0.119)*** Distance from major 0.0129 (0.0558) 0.0129 (0.0579) 0.208 (0.122)* 0.208 (0.129) river Distance from minor 0.146 (0.0841)* 0.146 (0.101) 0.126 (0.115) 0.126 (0.110) river Distance from nearest 0.0406 (0.0529) 0.0406 (0.0510) 0.0273 (0.0663) 0.0273 (0.0645) road Literacy rate 0.317 (1.34) 0.317 (1.39) 3.24 (1.08)*** 3.24 (0.945)*** Scheduled caste 0.843 (0.688) 0.843 (0.729) 3.29 (1.85)* 3.29 (2.18) Cultivator 0.599 (1.30) 0.599 (1.38) 0.161 (0.834) 0.161 (0.706) Agricultural laborer 3.14 (1.67)* 3.14 (1.69)* 5.01 (2.14)** 5.01 (2.90)* Worker in home 9.21 (11.2) 9.21 (9.93) 4.45 (25.1) 4.45 (23.9) industry Marginal worker 0.676 (1.13) 0.676 (1.39) 3.80 (1.50)** 3.80 (1.83)** Other worker 1.54 (3.21) 1.54 (3.00) 2.43 (3.14) 2.43 (2.59) Tahasil: Marshagai 0.635 (0.696) 0.635 (0.824) Tahasil: Patamundai 0.625 (0.447) 0.625 (0.545) 3.50 (1.09)*** 3.50 (0.710)*** Tahasil: Rajnagar 0.447 (0.482) 0.447 (0.546) 0.996 (0.595)* 0.996 (0.677) Constant 0.671 (1.16) 0.671 (1.17) 1.53 (1.16) 1.53 (1.12) Robust estimates refer to Huber-White sandwich estimates; clustered estimates allow for nonindependence across villages within the same gram panchayat (number of clusters 77 in full sample; 19 in subsample). Dependent variable is village-level number of deaths in all models. Subsample refers to villages within 10 km of coast. Models for full sample were estimated using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, with population used to adjust for the inflated number of villages with zero deaths. Models for subsample were estimated using poisson regression, with dummy variable for Marshagai dropped because this tahasil is beyond 10 km of coast. Standard errors are shown in parentheses beside coefficient estimates. Significance levels: ***1%, **5%, *10%. 10 of 10