On the Dynamics of Delayed Neural Feedback Loops. Sebastian Brandt Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis

Similar documents
Dynamical systems in neuroscience. Pacific Northwest Computational Neuroscience Connection October 1-2, 2010

Consider the following spike trains from two different neurons N1 and N2:

Computing with Inter-spike Interval Codes in Networks of Integrate and Fire Neurons

arxiv:physics/ v2 [physics.bio-ph] 21 Feb 2007

Neural Excitability in a Subcritical Hopf Oscillator with a Nonlinear Feedback

Most Probable Escape Path Method and its Application to Leaky Integrate And Fire Neurons

Localized Excitations in Networks of Spiking Neurons

DESYNCHRONIZATION TRANSITIONS IN RINGS OF COUPLED CHAOTIC OSCILLATORS

Self-organized Criticality and Synchronization in a Pulse-coupled Integrate-and-Fire Neuron Model Based on Small World Networks

Influence of Criticality on 1/f α Spectral Characteristics of Cortical Neuron Populations

Tracking the State of the Hindmarsh-Rose Neuron by Using the Coullet Chaotic System Based on a Single Input

Effects of Interactive Function Forms and Refractoryperiod in a Self-Organized Critical Model Based on Neural Networks

A Mathematical Study of Electrical Bursting in Pituitary Cells

Entrainment and Chaos in the Hodgkin-Huxley Oscillator

An Introductory Course in Computational Neuroscience

Causality and communities in neural networks

Memories Associated with Single Neurons and Proximity Matrices

Phase Locking. 1 of of 10. The PRC's amplitude determines which frequencies a neuron locks to. The PRC's slope determines if locking is stable

Modelling biological oscillations

Phase Response Properties and Phase-Locking in Neural Systems with Delayed Negative-Feedback. Carter L. Johnson

Effects of Interactive Function Forms in a Self-Organized Critical Model Based on Neural Networks

Dendritic computation

Lecture IV: LTI models of physical systems

Synchrony in Stochastic Pulse-coupled Neuronal Network Models

High-conductance states in a mean-eld cortical network model

Neural Modeling and Computational Neuroscience. Claudio Gallicchio

Balance of Electric and Diffusion Forces

Plasticity and learning in a network of coupled phase oscillators

Neuronal Dynamics: Computational Neuroscience of Single Neurons

Bo Deng University of Nebraska-Lincoln UNL Math Biology Seminar

Mathematical Analysis of Bursting Electrical Activity in Nerve and Endocrine Cells

Analysis of Neural Networks with Chaotic Dynamics

Lecture 4: Feed Forward Neural Networks

Visual Selection and Attention Shifting Based on FitzHugh-Nagumo Equations

Recursive calculation of effective potential and variational resummation

Coherence of Noisy Oscillators with Delayed Feedback Inducing Multistability

Delayed Feedback and GHz-Scale Chaos on the Driven Diode-Terminated Transmission Line

RF Upset and Chaos in Circuits: Basic Investigations. Steven M. Anlage, Vassili Demergis, Ed Ott, Tom Antonsen

Stability and bifurcation of a simple neural network with multiple time delays.

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.bio-ph] 19 Feb 1999

M. Dechesne R. Sepulchre

Sparse Coding as a Generative Model

Methods for Estimating the Computational Power and Generalization Capability of Neural Microcircuits

Self-Excited Vibration

Electrophysiology of the neuron

Phase Response. 1 of of 11. Synaptic input advances (excitatory) or delays (inhibitory) spiking

Nonlinear Dynamics of Neural Firing

Lecture 2: Analysis of Biomolecular Circuits

Firefly Synchronization. Morris Huang, Mark Kingsbury, Ben McInroe, Will Wagstaff

Introduction. Previous work has shown that AER can also be used to construct largescale networks with arbitrary, configurable synaptic connectivity.

Stochastic resonance in the absence and presence of external signals for a chemical reaction

Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: Elementary Bifurcations

3. Controlling the time delay hyper chaotic Lorenz system via back stepping control

CISC 3250 Systems Neuroscience

PULSE-COUPLED networks (PCNs) of integrate-and-fire

Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view

Oscillation Onset In. Neural Delayed Feedback

CONTROLLING CHAOS. Sudeshna Sinha. The Institute of Mathematical Sciences Chennai

Principles of DCM. Will Penny. 26th May Principles of DCM. Will Penny. Introduction. Differential Equations. Bayesian Estimation.

A Spiking Independent Accumulator Model for Winner-Take-All Computation

Chimera states in networks of biological neurons and coupled damped pendulums

1. Synchronization Phenomena

CSE/NB 528 Final Lecture: All Good Things Must. CSE/NB 528: Final Lecture

Lecture 11 : Simple Neuron Models. Dr Eileen Nugent

A More Complicated Model of Motor Neural Circuit of C. elegans

Synfire Waves in Small Balanced Networks

A Model for Real-Time Computation in Generic Neural Microcircuits

An analysis of how coupling parameters influence nonlinear oscillator synchronization

Asynchronous oscillations due to antigenic variation in Malaria Pf

Controlling Chaos in a State-Dependent Nonlinear System

Computation with phase oscillators: an oscillatory perceptron model

Convolutional networks. Sebastian Seung

Neuronal Dynamics: Computational Neuroscience of Single Neurons

Hierarchy. Will Penny. 24th March Hierarchy. Will Penny. Linear Models. Convergence. Nonlinear Models. References

Dynamical behaviour of a controlled vibro-impact system

Artificial Neural Networks Examination, June 2004

Membrane equation. VCl. dv dt + V = V Na G Na + V K G K + V Cl G Cl. G total. C m. G total = G Na + G K + G Cl

Artificial Neural Networks Examination, March 2004

Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to Control Chaos

team Hans Peter Büchler Nicolai Lang Mikhail Lukin Norman Yao Sebastian Huber

Data assimilation with and without a model

Circular symmetry of solutions of the neural field equation

IN THIS turorial paper we exploit the relationship between

Nature-inspired Analog Computing on Silicon

Neuron. Detector Model. Understanding Neural Components in Detector Model. Detector vs. Computer. Detector. Neuron. output. axon

Modeling and Results for a Mach-Zehnder Chaotic System

Introduction to Neural Networks

Chapter 14 Semiconductor Laser Networks: Synchrony, Consistency, and Analogy of Synaptic Neurons

Predicting Synchrony in Heterogeneous Pulse Coupled Oscillators

HSND-2015, IPR. Department of Physics, University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal.

This document is downloaded from DR-NTU, Nanyang Technological University Library, Singapore.

Single-Cell and Mean Field Neural Models

Krauskopf, B., Erzgraber, H., & Lenstra, D. (2006). Dynamics of semiconductor lasers with filtered optical feedback.

Dynamic Phasors in Modeling, Analysis and Control of Energy Processing Systems

Single neuron models. L. Pezard Aix-Marseille University

Linearization of F-I Curves by Adaptation

Assembling and Testing Physically Based Models of Observed Complex Systems

Dynamical phase transitions in periodically driven model neurons

Stochastic Oscillator Death in Globally Coupled Neural Systems

Canonical Neural Models 1

Transcription:

On the Dynamics of Delayed Neural Feedback Loops Sebastian Brandt Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis

Overview of Dissertation Chapter 2: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Variational calculation of the limit cycle and its frequency in a two-neuron model with delay, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036201/1-14 (2006). Chapter 3: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Synchronization in a neuronal feedback loop through asymmetric temporal delays, Europhys. Lett. 79, 38001/1-5 (2007). Chapter 4: U. Meyer, J. Shao, S. Chakrabarty, S. F. Brandt, H. Luksch, and R. Wessel, Distributed delays stabilize neural feedback systems (submitted). arxiv:0712.0036 [physics.bio-ph]. Chapter 5: M. Caudill, S. F. Brandt, and R. Wessel, Dynamics of neural feedback triads with delays (in preparation). Chapter 6: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, Winner-take-all selection in a neural system with delayed feedback, Biol. Cybern. 97, 221-228 (2007). Chapter 7: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, The isthmotectal feedback loop as a winner-take-all and novelty detection circuit (in preparation). Chapter 8: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Noise-dependent stability of the synchronized state in a coupled system of active rotators (in preparation). Chapter 9: S. F. Brandt, B. K. Dellen, and R.Wessel, Synchronization from disordered driving forces in arrays of coupled oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 034104/1-4 (2006).

Chapters 2 and 3 S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Variational calculation of the limit cycle and its frequency in a two-neuron model with delay, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036201/1-14 (2006). S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Synchronization in a neuronal feedback loop through asymmetric temporal delays, Europhys. Lett. 79, 38001/1-5 (2007). τ 1 u ( ) u ( ) 2 t 1 t τ 2

Chapter 4 U. Meyer, J. Shao, S. Chakrabarty, S. F. Brandt, H. Luksch, and R. Wessel, Distributed delays stabilize neural feedback systems (submitted). arxiv:0712.0036 [physics.bio-ph]. τ 1 u ( ) u ( ) 2 t 1 t τ 2

Chapter 5 M. Caudill, S. F. Brandt, and R. Wessel, Dynamics of neural feedback triads with delays (in preparation).

Chapters 6 and 7 S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, Winner-take-all selection in a neural system with delayed feedback, Biol. Cybern. 97, 221-228 (2007). S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, The isthmotectal feedback loop as a winner-take-all and novelty detection circuit (in preparation). Wang et al. (2004)

Chapter 8 S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Noise-dependent stability of the synchronized state in a coupled system of active rotators (in preparation).

Chapter 9 S. F. Brandt, B. K. Dellen, and R.Wessel, Synchronization from disordered driving forces in arrays of coupled oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 034104/1-4 (2006).

Outline of Talk Chapter 2: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Variational calculation of the limit cycle and its frequency in a two-neuron model with delay, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036201/1-14 (2006). Chapter 3: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Synchronization in a neuronal feedback loop through asymmetric temporal delays, Europhys. Lett. 79, 38001/1-5 (2007). u ( ) u ( t 2 ) 1 t τ 1 τ 2 Chapter 6: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, Winner-take-all selection in a neural system with delayed feedback, Biol. Cybern. 97, 221-228 (2007). Chapter 7: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, The isthmotectal feedback loop as a winner-take-all and novelty detection circuit (in preparation).

Time-Continuous Model of Neuron Dynamics by Hopfield Leaky neuron with external input and input from other neurons: Hopfield (1984) : input voltage, : output voltage, : synaptic interconnection matrix Nonlinear Transfer Function:

Two-Neuron Model With Delay Model Equations: Characteristic Equation: Supercritical Hopf-Bifurcation:

Poincaré-Lindstedt Method Expansions: plane: Rescaling:

Perturbative Results Angular Frequency Limit Cycle

Basic Principles of Variational Perturbation Theory Divergent Weak Coupling Series Convergent Strong Coupling Expansion Example: quantum-mechanical anharmonic oscillator:

Example: Anharmonic Oscillator Weak Coupling Series for Ground-State Energy Identity: Substitution: Example: First Order

Principle of Minimal Sensitivity Conditions:

Strong-Coupling Limit : Results Exponential Convergence:

Perturbation Expansion: Angular Frequency Introduction of Variational Parameter to the Perturbation Expansion: First Order: Result:

VPT Results: Convergence:

Limit Cycle Fourier Series: Introduction of Variational Parameter to the Fourier Series: Evaluation for Optimal Value from Angular Frequency:

VPT Results: Convergence:

Comparison VPT/Shohat Brandt, Pelster, and Wessel (2006) Conduction Velocity Asymmetry in the Biological System:

Numerical Results Delay Parameter: Covariance:

First Order VPT

VPT Results Brandt, Pelster, and Wessel (2007)

Outline of Talk Chapter 2: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Variational calculation of the limit cycle and its frequency in a two-neuron model with delay, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036201/1-14 (2006). Chapter 3: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Synchronization in a neuronal feedback loop through asymmetric temporal delays, Europhys. Lett. 79, 38001/1-5 (2007). u ( ) u ( t 2 ) 1 t τ 1 τ 2 Chapter 6: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, Winner-take-all selection in a neural system with delayed feedback, Biol. Cybern. 97, 221-228 (2007). Chapter 7: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, The isthmotectal feedback loop as a winner-take-all and novelty detection circuit (in preparation).

Bottom-Up Model For Attention (Koch and Ullman, 1985) Itti and Koch (2001)

The Isthmotectal feedback loop as a WTA circuit Wang et al. (2004)

Model Rate Model (Hopfield, 1984): Assumptions: Membrane Time Constants: Delays: Transfer Functions:

Topology: System of 2N + 1First-Order DDE s: Weights:

Numerical Results for Local Excitation and Global Inhibition No delay With delay - - + + + - - - -

Numerical Results for Local Inhibition and Global Excitation No delay With delay + + - - - + + + +

Outline of Talk Chapter 2: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Variational calculation of the limit cycle and its frequency in a two-neuron model with delay, Phys. Rev. E 74, 036201/1-14 (2006). Chapter 3: S. F. Brandt, A. Pelster, and R. Wessel, Synchronization in a neuronal feedback loop through asymmetric temporal delays, Europhys. Lett. 79, 38001/1-5 (2007). u ( ) u ( t 2 ) 1 t τ 1 τ 2 Chapter 6: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, Winner-take-all selection in a neural system with delayed feedback, Biol. Cybern. 97, 221-228 (2007). Chapter 7: S. F. Brandt and R. Wessel, The isthmotectal feedback loop as a winner-take-all and novelty detection circuit (in preparation).

Results from Marín et. al: Novelty Detection 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 Marín et al., J. Neurosci. (2007)

Model Network of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons dv τ dt = V E ) ( L + R I V = V T : V V R

Model Network of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons dv τ dt = V E ) ( L + R I V = V T : V V R

Model Network of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons dv τ dt = V E ) ( L + R I V = V T : V V R

Model Parameters variable constant

Random Scan of Parameter Space Simulate 1000 networks with random combinations of parameters Score networks according to winner-take-all selection and novelty detection TeO Ipc Imc

- Best network: unchanged Genetic Algorithm - Top 50 % of networks percentile rank 10%: probability of1/30 for change of every parameter: 1/2top, 1/2 arithmetic mean 10% percentile rank < 20% probability of 1/15 for change of every parameter: 1/2top, 1/2 arithmetic mean 20% percentile rank < 30%: probability of 2/15 for change of every parameter: 1/2top, 1/2 arithmetic mean 30 % percentile rank < 50 % probability of1/3 for change of every parameter: 1/2top, 1/2 arithmetic mean Point mutation (+/- 1) with probability 1/10 - Bottom 50 % of networks With probability 1/3: all parameters: 1/2top, 1/2 arithmetic mean With probability 1/3: all parameters: 1/2 2nd best, 1/2 arithmetic mean With probability 1/3: all parameters: 1/2 3rd best, 1/2 arithmetic mean Point mutation (any value) with probability 1/10

Parameter Optimization Simulate 20 generations of 50 networks Use genetic algorithm to optimize for winner-take-all selection and novelty detection TeO Ipc Imc

Convergence of Genetic Algorithm Score of best three networks vs. generation #

Predicting Parameter Relations Measured Delays: Meyer et al. (submitted)

Summary Variational Resummation Synchrony from asymmetric delays Delays and WTA Parameter optimization through genetic algorithm