DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview

Similar documents
The time period while the spacecraft is in transit to lunar orbit shall be used to verify the functionality of the spacecraft.

Team X Study Summary for ASMCS Theia. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. with contributions from the Theia Team

Lunette: Satellite to Satellite Gravity Mapping of the Moon

New Worlds Observer Operations Concept NEW WORLDS OBSERVER OPERATIONS CONCEPT (OPSCON)

Small Satellite Aerocapture for Increased Mass Delivered to Venus and Beyond

Mission Design Overview for the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (GRAIL) Mission

LOW-COST LUNAR COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION

A Concept of Nanosatellite Small Fleet for Earth Observation

WISE Science Data System Single Frame Position Reconstruction Peer Review: Introduction and Overview

Vicky Chu, Jer Ling, Tom Lin, Joe Fong, Feng-Tai Huang, Guey-Shin Chang. April 15, 2011

The Interstellar Boundary Explorer (IBEX) Mission Design: A Pegasus Class Mission to a High Energy Orbit

SciBox, a Proven Automated Planning and Commanding System

SELENE TRANSLUNAR TRAJECTORY AND LUNAR ORBIT INJECTION

ESSE Payload Design. 1.2 Introduction to Space Missions

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix E. Section E: Starshades Subsection E.6: Starshade Spacecraft Lead Author: Amy Lo

ASPECT Spectral Imager CubeSat Mission to Didymos

Mission Overview. EAGLE: Study Goals. EAGLE: Science Goals. Mission Architecture Overview

Attitude Determination and Control System Design for STU-2A Cubesat and In-Orbit Results

SSC13-VI-1 MISSION DESIGN CONCEPT

Small Satellite Aerocapture for Increased Mass Delivered to Venus and Beyond

The Quantum Sensor Challenge Designing a System for a Space Mission. Astrid Heske European Space Agency The Netherlands

PRELIMINAJ3.:( 6/8/92 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICATION FOR THE DSPSE GUIDANCE, NAVIGATION, AND CONTROL CSCI. Prepared by

New Worlds Observer Final Report Appendix J. Appendix J: Trajectory Design and Orbit Determination Lead Author: Karen Richon

ESMO Mission Analysis

LADEE PDS Mission Description

Paper Session III-B - Mars Global Surveyor: Cruising to Mars

The Lunar polar Hydrogen Mapper (LunaH-Map) CubeSat Mission. Hannah Kerner Flight Software Lead

Prospector-1: A Low-Cost Commercial Asteroid Mission Grant Bonin SmallSat 2016

Spacecraft Bus / Platform

LAUNCH SYSTEMS. Col. John Keesee. 5 September 2003

The E-SAIL programme. 10th IAA Symposium on Small Satellites for Earth Observation April 20-24, 2015 Berlin LuxSpace s.à.r.

What s Up in Space? Dean W McCall, Ed.D.

Proton Launch System Mission Planner s Guide APPENDIX F. Proton Launch System Options and Enhancements

MISSION ENGINEERING SPACECRAFT DESIGN

The European Student Moon Orbiter (ESMO) A Small Mission for Education, Outreach, and Science

Orbit Design Marcelo Suárez. 6th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010

Lunar Flashlight & NEA Scout A NanoSat Architecture for Deep Space Exploration

Launch strategy for Indian lunar mission and precision injection to the Moon using genetic algorithm

Orbiter Element Brian Cooke

GRAIL Takes A Roundabout Route To Lunar Orbit

Astrodynamics of Interplanetary Cubesats

Spacecraft Bus / Platform

Space Frequency Coordination Group

Overview of the Current Baseline of the Solar-C Spacecraft System

ADVANCED NAVIGATION STRATEGIES FOR AN ASTEROID SAMPLE RETURN MISSION

arxiv:gr-qc/ v1 15 Nov 2004

Satellite Components & Systems. Dr. Ugur GUVEN Aerospace Engineer (P.hD) Nuclear Science & Technology Engineer (M.Sc)

Predicting Long-Term Telemetry Behavior for Lunar Orbiting, Deep Space, Planetary and Earth Orbiting Satellites

Status of the European Student Moon Orbiter (ESMO) Project:

Communication. Provides the interface between ground and the spacecraft Functions:

GOES-R Instrument Status and Accommodations. Barbara Pfarr GOES-R Program Systems Engineering January 2010 AMS Conference

Figure 1. View of ALSAT-2A spacecraft

MAE 180A: Spacecraft Guidance I, Summer 2009 Homework 4 Due Thursday, July 30.

Exploring the Mysteries of the Cosmos on the MOST Microsatellite Mission

Creating Large Space Platforms From Small Satellites

SMAP Data Product Overview

Science planning and operations for Mars Express

AUTOMATED FLIGHT DYNAMICS SYSTEM FOR THAICHOTE SATELLITE

WISE Science Data System Frame Co-addition Peer Review: Introduction and Overview

GODDARD RAPID SPACECRAFT DEVELOPMENT OFFICE (RSDO) CATALOG SPACECRAFT BUS APPROACH. RSDO Catalog

OTSUKIMI Moon-sighting Satellite Kyushu Institute of Technology. 3 rd Mission Idea Contest UNISEC Global

Small Spacecraft Design for the GRAIL Mission

mission status & ISRU related activity in Japan

Successful Demonstration for Upper Stage Controlled Re-entry Experiment by H-IIB Launch Vehicle

Using the International Space Station as an Engineering Technology Research Laboratory for Space Based Telescopes

StellarXplorers IV Qualifying Round 2 (QR2) Quiz Answer Key

Marlene H. Dortch Secretary, Federal Communications Commission th Street, S.W. Washington, D.C

MarCO: Early Operations of the First CubeSats to Mars

China s Chang E Program

Launch Period Development for the Juno Mission to Jupiter

SP-1291 June Mars Express. The Scientific Investigations

THE TRAJECTORY CONTROL STRATEGIES FOR AKATSUKI RE-INSERTION INTO THE VENUS ORBIT

ISIS Impactor for Surface and Interior Science

Section E. Mission Implementation Plan

End of Life Re-orbiting The Meteosat-5 Experience

I n the early morning of 9 November 2005, Reaching our Sister Planet

ASEN 6008: Interplanetary Mission Design Lab Spring, 2015

BepiColombo MPO Science Operations Planning Drivers IWPSS-2013

Design of Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem

Small Satellite Rendezvous and Characterization of Asteroid Apophis

ExoplanetSat: A Nanosatellite Space Telescope for Detecting Transiting Exoplanets

Mars Sample Return Mission

Deep Space Communication*

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Interplanetary Cruise Navigation

Status of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Observatory

Space Travel on a Shoestring: CubeSat Beyond LEO

THE MICRO ADVANCED STELLAR COMPASS FOR ESA S PROBA 2 MISSION

483 Lecture. Space Mission Requirements. February11, Definition Examples Dos/ Don ts Traceability

Remote Imaging of Electron Acceleration at the Sun with a Lunar Radio Array

Introduction of Small Solar Power Sail Demonstrator IKAROS

Electrically Propelled Cargo Spacecraft for Sustained Lunar Supply Operations

Venus Express: The Spacecraft

SENTINEL-1A FLIGHT DYNAMICS LEOP OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE

Power, Propulsion, and Thermal Preliminary Design Review James Black Matt Marcus Grant McLaughlin Michelle Sultzman

Final Examination 2015

BOWSER Balloon Observatory for Wavelength and Spectral Emission Readings

Generation X. Attitude Control Systems (ACS) Aprille Ericsson Dave Olney Josephine San. July 27, 2000

An Astrophysics Mission of Opportunity on the International Space Station

AIM RS: Radio Science Investigation with AIM

Design of an Earth-to-Mars Tether Launch System

Transcription:

DARE Mission and Spacecraft Overview October 6, 2010 Lisa Hardaway, PhD Mike Weiss, Scott Mitchell, Susan Borutzki, John Iacometti, Grant Helling The information contained herein is the private property of Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. that is being made available to the recipient under the terms of a nondisclosure agreement or by other special arrangement. It may not be used, in whole or in part, except for the limited purpose for which it has been furnished. It may not be distributed or reproduced, except as specifically authorized by Ball Aerospace and with this legend conspicuously attached. This information is exempt from public disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), and its use by Government personnel is subject to the restrictions imposed by 18 U.S.C. 1905.

Agenda Mission Design Overview Lunar trajectory Insertion Orbit Spacecraft Design Overview Mission operations Overview Page_2

Two Types of Trajectories to Get to the Moon Direct (conventional) Hohmann transfer, used by most lunar missions including Apollo Weak Stability Boundary trajectory The WSB lunar trajectory offers savings in terms of orbit insertion delta-v, at the cost of restricted launch days per month and much longer transit duration. DARE has selected the WSB due to fuel savings Smaller fuel tank enables use of smaller launch fairing Gravitational attraction of Earth and moon approximately balanced Used successfully by the Japanese Hiten mission in 1991. Compatible with Taurus and Minotaur launch vehicles Page_3

Insertion into Orbit is Dependent on Launch Requires specific injection conditions (leaving Earth) and a few small, delicate trajectory correction maneuvers to produce the trajectory desired. Launch must occur when the moon is about 140 degrees counter-clockwise from the sun direction. The trajectory will then be as shown, in quadrant II. There is a second launch opportunity each month in quadrant IV Launch a day or two earlier or later is possible, At the cost of larger mid-course correction burns. Two sets of launch windows each month Each is one launch opportunity per day for ~5 consecutive days. Quadrant II Quadrant IV Page_4

The DARE Orbit has Heritage 200 Km selected as best balance between maximum data acquisition and altitude variations Equatorial lunar orbits at an altitude of 100 to 200 km are stable ~70-80 km periodic variations in apoapsis and periapsis altitudes DARE orbit stable without propulsive orbit maintenance for the mission Actual Lunar Prospector eccentricity-argument of periapsis in 100 km orbit (from Folta, et al., 1999, p. 3) Page_5

Spacecraft Maximizes Science Data Value by Optimizing Instrument Performance The DARE spacecraft is specifically designed to support the DARE science investigations with these key features: RF quiet spacecraft implementation does not compromise data gathering Spacecraft configuration that supports DARE antenna with a large, clear field of view Maximization of the DARE antenna baseline within fairing constraints Large data storage capacity, allowing for uninterrupted science even with missed ground contacts System architecture with high heritage from Kepler, Deep Impact (DI), WISE, and STP-SIV Propulsion tank sized to take advantage of a lighter spacecraft, Additional fuel equates to a shorter burn time for orbit capture Modular construction, allowing parallel integration and thereby reducing schedule risk Compatibility with standard 63 -fairing LV Page_6

Spacecraft and Payload Minimize Deployment Instrument radials deploy Solar arrays deploy downward away from the RF sensitive payload Instrument Payload Solar Arrays Deployed Spacecraft Interior Shown in Taurus 3113 (XL, 63 fairing, Star37 5 th stage) Page_7

Spacecraft Systems Simple and Proven ADCS design provides medium-accuracy pointing and navigation using flight-proven hardware and control algorithms Single String Star Tracker, IMU, Coarse Sun Sensor 3-axis Stabilized Reaction Wheels and Thrusters Monopropellant systems ensures a robust propulsion design. Low-cost system that meets DARE requirements using high-heritage components Lunar insertion with hydrazine thrusters Thrusters provide (minimal) orbit maintenance and de-saturate the reaction wheels The electrical power subsystem (EPS) uses a direct energy-transfer architecture that is reliable and efficient Battery dominated with fixed solar arrays The Thermal controls system will be mostly passive using Multi-Layer Insulation with a solar reflective outer layer Radiators will be oriented to avoid the Moon s IR load. 14 heater circuits controlled by redundant mechanical thermostats. Page_8

Modifications to Some Sub-systems Optimize Mission Performance The structure provides a Faraday cage to reduce RF noise emissions from the spacecraft components S-band telecom subsystem is based on the flight-proven architecture. Standard S-Band multi-mode transceiver provides S-band uplink and downlink functions. The S-band system provides both (1) high-data rate, high-data-volume capability for the mission science using a medium gain antenna (2) standard command/housekeeping functions via the hemispherical coverage low-gain antennas The data handling (C&DH) architecture is based on a light-weight high-performance single-string Integrated Avionics Unit (IAU) Low volume and mass supports the RF quiet bus 32+ Gbyte mass memory board for science data storage Incorporation of unique payload interfaces DARE FSW has the ability to easily adapt to changing mission demands. Includes modules for real-time (CCSDS) command and telemetry management, stored command processing, fault protection, attitude determination and control, battery charge management and instrument control Page_9

Mission Operations Utilize the Near Earth Network For command uplink, data downlink, and tracking data (Doppler, Ranging, Angle). The spacecraft uses medium gain antenna for science and stored engineering data downlinks, and a low gain antenna for uplink and real-time downlink via S-band. Data downlink is automated Commanding occurs once/week Data analysis will begin 6 months after first data received DARE Mission Timeline Terminal Countdown Start (L 3 hours) Spacecraft at launch site (L 8 weeks) Launch Launch Vehicle Separation Detumble, Acquire Sun AOS Deploy Antenna Radials LOI L+3 years L + TBD Mission Phases Pre-Launch Launch & Initialize Cruise Science Operations Post Operations Sub-Phases Bus Checkout TCMs Late Cruise Payload Calibration Science Collection Decommission Data Analysis Completion of final data analysis, archive Page_10

DARE Spacecraft Uniquely Suited to Science Objectives Spacecraft does not interfere with data gathering RF quiet Large data storage capacity Deployables located below instrument ground plane Design simplicity and heritage optimize data quality and cost Minor modifications where needed for instrument unique interfaces Trajectory and station keeping optimized to reduce fuel need Reduces size of propulsion tank Able to fit into standard size launch fairing Mission operations specific to DARE Page_11