DRIFT EFFECTS IN HgCdTe DETECTORS

Similar documents
InAs/GaSb Mid-Wave Cascaded Superlattice Light Emitting Diodes

PHOTOVOLTAICS Fundamentals

Computer modelling of Hg 1 x Cd x Te photodiode performance

3.1 Introduction to Semiconductors. Y. Baghzouz ECE Department UNLV

Chapter 7. Solar Cell

Simulation of AlGaN/Si and InN/Si ELECTRIC DEVICES

Lecture 15: Optoelectronic devices: Introduction

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

EE 5344 Introduction to MEMS CHAPTER 5 Radiation Sensors

Solar cells operation

Supplementary material for High responsivity mid-infrared graphene detectors with antenna-enhanced photo-carrier generation and collection

Semiconductor Physical Electronics

EE 5611 Introduction to Microelectronic Technologies Fall Tuesday, September 23, 2014 Lecture 07

Title: Colloidal Quantum Dots Intraband Photodetectors

EE 6313 Homework Assignments

Carrier Recombination

ET3034TUx Utilization of band gap energy

Single Photon detectors

February 1, 2011 The University of Toledo, Department of Physics and Astronomy SSARE, PVIC

Chapter 3 The InAs-Based nbn Photodetector and Dark Current

Basics of Infrared Detection

Photonic Communications Engineering Lecture. Dr. Demetris Geddis Department of Engineering Norfolk State University

Chapter 6: Light-Emitting Diodes

Energetic particles and their detection in situ (particle detectors) Part II. George Gloeckler

Carrier Loss Analysis for Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes

Course overview. Me: Dr Luke Wilson. The course: Physics and applications of semiconductors. Office: E17 open door policy

Comparison of Ge, InGaAs p-n junction solar cell

Lect. 10: Photodetectors

Thermionic Current Modeling and Equivalent Circuit of a III-V MQW P-I-N Photovoltaic Heterostructure

INFRARED EMISSION: A NEW POSSIBLE APPROACH TO PARTICLE DETECTORS

Utmost response time of long-wave HgCdTe photodetectors operating under zero voltage condition

FIBER OPTICS. Prof. R.K. Shevgaonkar. Department of Electrical Engineering. Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture: 14.

Supplementary Figure 1. Supplementary Figure 1 Characterization of another locally gated PN junction based on boron

Luminescence Process

Paper Review. Special Topics in Optical Engineering II (15/1) Minkyu Kim. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Feb 1985

Non-traditional methods of material properties and defect parameters measurement

Physics of the thermal behavior of photovoltaic cells

In this block the two transport mechanisms will be discussed: diffusion and drift.

Lecture 5 Junction characterisation

Third generation solar cells - How to use all the pretty colours?

CMOS Devices and CMOS Hybrid Devices. Array Detector Data Reduction and Problems

Lecture 11: Direct Imaging 1. Overview. Photoconductive Detection. Charge Coupled Devices. Outline

An Overview of the analysis of two dimensional back illuminated GaAs MESFET

Study of Hall Effect Sensor and Variety of Temperature Related Sensitivity

Multiband GaN/AlGaN UV Photodetector

Lecture 4 - Carrier generation and recombination. February 12, 2007

Session 5: Solid State Physics. Charge Mobility Drift Diffusion Recombination-Generation

Barrier Photodetectors for High Sensitivity and High Operating Temperature Infrared Sensors

ELECTRONIC DEVICES AND CIRCUITS SUMMARY

1 Name: Student number: DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS AND PHYSICAL OCEANOGRAPHY MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND. Fall :00-11:00

A study of the silicon Bulk-Barrier Diodes designed in planar technology by means of simulation

Characterization of the In 0.53 Ga 0.47 As n + nn + Photodetectors

DEVICE CHARACTERIZATION OF (AgCu)(InGa)Se 2 SOLAR CELLS

Theoretical Study on Graphene Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell

Temperature and Silicon Film Thickness Influence on the Operation of Lateral SOI PIN Photodiodes for Detection of Short Wavelengths

Inductively coupled plasma induced type conversion of HgCdTe for infrared photodiode applications

A Determination of Planck s Constant with LED s written by Mark Langella

High Power Diode Lasers

Haoyang Cui, Jialin Wang, Chaoqun Wang, Can Liu, Kaiyun Pi, Xiang Li, Yongpeng Xu, and Zhong Tang

Introduction to Optoelectronic Device Simulation by Joachim Piprek

Photoelectrochemical characterization of Bi 2 S 3 thin films deposited by modified chemical bath deposition

A. K. Das Department of Physics, P. K. College, Contai; Contai , India.

A Photovoltaic Detector Technology Based on. Plasma-induced p-to-n Type Conversion of. Long Wavelength Infrared HgCdTe. Thuyen Huu Manh Nguyen

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Metal Vapour Lasers Use vapoured metal as a gain medium Developed by W. Silfvast (1966) Two types: Ionized Metal vapour (He-Cd) Neutral Metal vapour

Uniform excitation: applied field and optical generation. Non-uniform doping/excitation: diffusion, continuity

Lecture 18. New gas detectors Solid state trackers

Appendix 1: List of symbols

A SOLID STATE PYRANOMETER. Anca Laura Dumitrescu, Marius Paulescu, Aurel Ercuta

SILICON AVALANCHE PHOTODIODES ARRAY FOR PARTICLE DETECTOR: MODELLING AND FABRICATION

Unit IV Semiconductors Engineering Physics

Device 3D. 3D Device Simulator. Nano Scale Devices. Fin FET

Sheng S. Li. Semiconductor Physical Electronics. Second Edition. With 230 Figures. 4) Springer

Semiconductors and Optoelectronics. Today Semiconductors Acoustics. Tomorrow Come to CH325 Exercises Tours

DEVICE CHARACTERISTICS OF VLWIR MCT PHOTODIODES. August 1999

LASER. Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation

EE495/695 Introduction to Semiconductors I. Y. Baghzouz ECE Department UNLV

Lecture 8. Equations of State, Equilibrium and Einstein Relationships and Generation/Recombination

Atmospheric Extinction

OPTICAL RESPONSE STUDY OF THE Al=a-SiC:H SCHOTTKY DIODE FOR DIFFERENT SUBSTRATE TEMPERATURES OF THE r.f. SPUTTERED a-sic:h THIN FILM

Quiz #1 Practice Problem Set

Chapter 1 Overview of Semiconductor Materials and Physics

Chalcogenide semiconductor research and applications. Tutorial 2: Thin film characterization. Rafael Jaramillo Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Laser Basics. What happens when light (or photon) interact with a matter? Assume photon energy is compatible with energy transition levels.

T. L. Lin, J. S. Park, S. D. Gunapala, E. W. Jones, and H. M. Del Castillo. Pasadena, CA 91109

Organic Electronic Devices

Spring Semester 2012 Final Exam

Multiple Exciton Generation in Quantum Dots. James Rogers Materials 265 Professor Ram Seshadri

UNIT I: Electronic Materials.

arxiv: v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] 18 Sep 2013

Photodetector. Prof. Woo-Young Choi. Silicon Photonics (2012/2) Photodetection: Absorption => Current Generation. Currents

Nanophotonics: solar and thermal applications

Semiconductor Physics. Lecture 3

Photosynthesis & Solar Power Harvesting

Radiation damage models: comparison between Silvaco and Synopsys

Lab #5 Current/Voltage Curves, Efficiency Measurements and Quantum Efficiency

Status Report: Charge Cloud Explosion

Toward a 1D Device Model Part 1: Device Fundamentals

Title: Ultrafast photocurrent measurement of the escape time of electrons and holes from

Transcription:

Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 8, No. 4 (2013) 472-481 School of Engineering, Taylor s University DRIFT EFFECTS IN HgCdTe DETECTORS B. PAVAN KUMAR 1, M. W. AKRAM 1, *, BAHNIMAN GHOSH 1, JOSEPH JOHN 2 1 Department of Electrical Eng., Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur-208016, India 2 Department of Electrical Eng., Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai, Powai-400076, India *Corresponding Author: mwakram@iitk.ac.in Abstract The characteristics of temporal drift in spectral responsivity of HgCdTe photodetectors is investigated and found to have an origin different from what has been reported in literature. Traditionally, the literature attributes the cause of drift due to the deposition of thin film of ice water on the active area of the cold detector. The source of drift as proposed in this paper is more critical owing to the difficulties in acquisition of infrared temperature measurements. A model explaining the drift phenomenon in HgCdTe detectors is described by considering the deep trapping of charge carriers and generation of radiation induced deep trap centers which are meta-stable in nature. A theoretical model is fitted to the experimental data. A comparison of the model with the experimental data shows that the radiation induced deep trap centers and charge trapping effects are mainly responsible for the drift phenomenon observed in HgCdTe detectors. Keywords: HgCdTe, Spectral responsivity, Meta-stable traps, Quantum efficiency, Detectivity, Carrier lifetime. 1. Introduction HgCdTe detectors are widely used in high speed infrared radiation measurements since it has high response speed. By varying the composition of x in Hg 1-x Cd x Te its bandgap can be tuned over a wide range (0-1.5 ev) and therefore it is a noteworthy material for detector applications over the entire IR range [1-4]. HgCdTe is a direct bandgap semiconductor with large optical absorption coefficient. In order to reduce the number of thermally generated minority carriers and also to obtain higher responsivity, HgCdTe detectors have to be operated at cryogenic temperature (~80 K). Stability of the spectral responsivity of photodetectors with time is an important requirement for accurate infrared 472

Drift Effects in HgCdTe Detectors 473 radiation measurements. These HgCdTe photo detectors are widely used over 3-5 µm wavelengths due to their higher responsivity and also offering low noise equivalent power (NEP) [1]. The stochastic nature of generation and recombination of charge carriers limits the performance of HgCdTe photodetectors. The response per unit incident radiant power of HgCdTe detectors shows wavelength dependence. To have a very fast response and perfect signalto-noise ratio, the HgCdTe detectors need cooling. Drift of spectral responsivity with time is observed in HgCdTe detectors. The characteristics of the drift are investigated and found to have an origin different from that reported in literature [5-8]. The drifts as reported in literature are caused due to the deposition of ice on the active area of the cold detector. Ice has a strong absorption coefficient approximately 3.1µm and so the incident radiant power on the detector reaching the active area is depleted due to absorption of radiation by ice in between them. The increasing thickness of ice in front of the active area of the detector results in decrease in spectral responsivity of cryogenically cooled detectors at 3.1 µm wavelength. Analogous behaviour in the responsivity of HgCdTe detectors has also been observed in the regime of 11 to 13 µm wavelength. One of the authors [6] attributed the drift in spectral responsivity due to interaction of the thin film of ice (a dielectric film) with the multilayer dielectric anti-reflection coatings deposited on the active areas of HgCdTe detectors. These drifts could be reduced by regularly evacuating the detector Dewar by baking it at temperatures of 50 C for approximately 48h. This ensured ice-free operation for a few weeks. The aim of this paper is to report the causes of drift in HgCdTe detectors which is different from that reported in literature. The Dewar in which the detector is housed had been completely evacuated before the drifts were observed. This ensures that drifts observed have nothing to do with ice-formation. All the photoconductive (PC) HgCdTe detectors whose drift characteristics are subject of this paper, consists of 1 mm 1 mm active areas and is thermo-electric cooled. The source of drift as proposed in this paper is more critical owing to the difficulties in acquisition of infrared temperature measurements. In this work it is demonstrated that the source of new drift is due to charge trapping effects and generation of radiation induced deep trap centers which are meta-stable in nature [9-11]. Experiments and simulations have been carried out to ascertain the cause of the drift and a theoretical model has been proposed which explains the characteristics of the drift phenomenon. It has been shown that due to the variation of radiation induced deep trap centers, effective carrier lifetime in the semiconductor changes and hence the drift effects are being observed. 2. Experiments 2.1. Experimental setup Figure 1 shows the block diagram of the experimental setup. The detector was placed in a chamber in front of infrared source. The incandescent bulbs of different intensities (40 W, 100 W, 200 W, 300 W) are used as infrared source [1-4]. These are ordinary incandescent bulbs used at households (made by M/s Philips India). These bulbs have peak emission in the 500-700 nm region with comparatively lower powers above the visible range (>750 nm). Judson J15D series HgCdTe photoconductive (PC) detector with three stage thermo-electric cooling is being used. The three stage thermo-electric cooler maintains the

474 B. P. Kumar et al. detector at -65 o C. LM35, a temperature sensor IC is placed in front of the detector to monitor the temperature of the chamber. Fig. 1. Block Diagram of the Experimental Setup. The model PA-300 current pre-amplifier is used in conjunction with J15D series HgCdTe detectors as shown in Fig 2. A National Instruments NI USB- 6221, multifunction DAQ, is used to digitize the analog voltages. The output of the detector-amplifier and LM35 output are wired into appropriate channels of NI USB-6221 for data acquisition. The NI USB-6221 is connected to the computer which interacts with the controlling software programmed in LabVIEW. The program developed in LabVIEW is used to store data output of the detector over a period of time. Readings were taken for every 30 seconds over a period of approximately 6 hours. After the temperature gets stabilized inside the chamber due to incandescent bulb, the power to the detector is switched on and the output of the detector is recorded for a period of six hours. The experiments are conducted for different temperature measurements as shown in the Table 1 and are repeated to check reproducibility. Table 1. Temperature of the Chamber Maintained due to Different Bulb Intensities. S. No. Bulb Intensities Temperature of chamber 1 40 W 45 2 100 W 55 3 200 W 70 4 300 W 90 The first stage output voltage V out of the detector is given by the following equation V out = (V d - V b ) G b R f + (V d R f G d ) + V d (1) It can be seen from Eq. (1) that V out is a linear function of the photodetector conductance G d. V d is the voltage across the detector, R f is the feedback resistor as shown in Fig. 2, R b is the bias resistor, G b =(1/ R b ), and V b is the voltage across bias resistor. R b = 2.64 KΩ, R d = 230Ω, R set = 357 Ω. Fig. 2. PA-300 Preamp Equivalent Circuit.

Drift Effects in HgCdTe Detectors 475 2.2. Observations The output voltage of the detector is observed to slowly drift with time as shown in Figs. 3 and 4, and the drift in output voltage for different temperatures is shown in Fig. 5. The resulting drifts are reproducible. It is observed that the amount of drift for different temperature measurements is dependent on the intensity of radiation. After running the device for a long time, it is switched off and put to on state again; output recovers to its initial values and starts to drift again. This suggests that the mechanism responsible for these drifts is reversible. Fig. 3. Output Drift for a Temperature Measurement of 45 o C. Fig. 4. Output Drift for a Temperature Measurement of 55 o C. Fig. 5. Drift in Output Voltage for Various Temperature Measurements.

476 B. P. Kumar et al. 2.3. Discussions This output voltage drift with time is attributed to the decrease in spectral responsivity of the detector with time. This decrease in responsivity is attributed not just due to trapping of charge carriers but also due to increased recombination through meta-stable trap centre s which are generated due to irradiation. The radiation induced defects take up a broad spectrum of energy levels within the semiconductor energy gap and act as recombination centers or electron trap centers that cause a change in free carrier concentration, mobility and carrier lifetime. Therefore, the increase in trap density results in increase in the resistance of the detector. The resistance variation with time is plotted for a temperature measurement of 70 o C as observed from experiment shown in Fig. 6. The variation of resistance with trap density as estimated from simulations is shown in Fig. 7. The increased recombination due to radiation induced deep trap centers reduces the carrier-lifetime and hence reduces the gain and responsivity of the photoconductive detector. Since the output recovers to its initial values when the detector is switched on again, this suggests that radiation induced deep trap centers are meta-stable in nature. Fig. 6. Detector Resistance Variation due to Continuous-Wave Irradiation. Fig. 7. Detector Resistance Variation with Trap Density.

Drift Effects in HgCdTe Detectors 477 3. Simulation Numerical computations and simulations have been carried out using ATLAS Silvaco for the theoretical characterization of an n-type Hg 0.71 Cd 0.29 Te photoconductive detector at an operating temperature of 208 K. Simulations are carried out to characterize drift phenomenon theoretically in the HgCdTe PC detectors. A program has been developed for simulation of a two dimensional photoconductive detector. The photoconductive detector consists of an n-type Hg 0.71 Cd 0.29 Te photoconductor grown on sapphire substrate. The parameters used in simulation are shown in Table 2. I-V characteristics have been plotted for increasing trap densities. The resistances calculated from the slopes of these I-V curves are matched to the experimental data (Resistance variation with time).the plot of resistance variation with trap density is shown in Fig. 7. The simulated data stored in.log files is extracted using Origin tool and then from the extracted data s, the quantum efficiency is plotted. The photoconductive gain, g, in a photoconductive detector defined as the ratio of the carrier lifetime to the transit time of charge carriers, also decreases due to decrease in carrier lifetime. Table 2. Parameters Used in Simulation. Parameter Values n-type Hg 1-x Cd x Te X = 0.2915 Operating Temperature 208 K Bandgap Energy (E g) 0.2583 ev Cut-off wavelength ( c ) 4.8 µm Length (l) 50 µm Width (w) 50 µm Thickness (t) 10 µm Intrinsic carrier concentration 3.387 10 14 cm -3 Capture cross section ( p, n ) 10-16 cm 2 Background photon flux 6.5 10 14 photons / cm 2 s n-type doping density 8 10 16 cm -3 The carrier lifetime decreases due to increase in recombination through deep level traps generated because of irradiation. The performance of photodetector depends on the lifetime of photoexcited carriers. The effective carrier lifetime (τ eff ) is given by [12], 1 τ eff 1 = τ SRH 1 1 + + τ τ R Aug 2S + d (2) where τ SRH is the Shockley-Read-Hall lifetime, τ Aug is Auger lifetime, τ R is the radiative recombination lifetime and S is the surface recombination velocity. The increased trap density results in increase in trap assisted non-radiative recombination and reduces the overall lifetime of the carriers. The Shockley- Read-Hall lifetime is given by [2], τ SRH 1 = (3) σ υ N n th trap

478 B. P. Kumar et al. where n is the capture cross section, N trap is the trap density and the thermal velocity of charge carrier ( υ ) in n-type Hg 1-x Cd x Te alloy is given by [2], * n th 8KT υ th = (4) πm The carrier lifetime has an effect on photoconductive current gain of the HgCdTe detector. The photoconductive current gain is defined as the ratio of the carrier lifetime, τ eff, to the transit time of carriers, τ tr. The expression for photoconductive current gain (g) can be written as [2], g τ eff = (5) τ tr The gain of the photoconductor is shown to be affected by non-radiative recombination through trap centers. The photoconductive gain is plotted as a function of trap density in Fig. 8. The responsivity and detectivity which depends on the gain of the PC detector also decreases. The responsivity variation with increasing trap density is shown in Fig. 9. The responsivity decreases with increasing trap density. The responsivity, R V of an HgCdTe photoconductor is given by [12], R V ηeλqgrd = (6) hc where η e is the quantum efficiency, g is the photoconductive current gain. The detectivity (D*) which characterizes the signal-to-noise ratio of the detector also decreases with the increase in trap density and it is expressed as [2], R lwb D = V * V (7) n where B is the bandwidth of the detector and V n is the noise voltage. 140 120 100 Photoconductive gain, g 80 60 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Trap density N t (cm -3 ) x 10 14 Fig. 8. Variation of Photoconductor Gain with SRH Trap Density for an Applied Voltage of 1.17 V in the Absence of Surface Recombination.

Drift Effects in HgCdTe Detectors 479 Fig. 9. Variation of Responsivity with Operating Wavelength for Different Trap Densities. 4. Analytical Model The radiation induced deep trap centers are considered to be better recombination centers. The concentration of radiation induced deep trap centers is a function of material, energy of radiation, and the amount of radiation exposure. The kinetics of generation of deep trap centers due to radiation is considered to be a first order rate equation, as given below, N t (t) = N oe + N se (1-Exp(t/t M )) (8) where N oe is the concentration of initial deep trap centers. N se is the saturation value of the radiation induced deep trap centers and t M is the time constant. N se and t M are constants which depend on the intensity of radiation. Figure 10 shows the variation of trap density with time for different radiation measurements. The markers indicate the variation of trap density with time as estimated from simulations and the solid line represents the fitting curve plotted using the analytical model developed. By using least squares fitting method in MATLAB, the values of N se, t M for different temperatures are extracted as shown in Table 3. The initial value of trap density during irradiation N oe, for all temperature measurements is found to be 1 10 13 cm -3. Table 3. The Saturation Value of Radiation Induced Deep-Trap Centers and the Time Constant for Different Temperature Measurements. Time constant, t M (hrs) 45 5.40 5.0 10 13 55 4.42 5.4 10 13 70 3.04 6.2 10 13 90 2.03 6.8 10 13 Temperature ( o C) Saturation value of trap density, N se (cm -3 )

480 B. P. Kumar et al. x 10 13 7 6 5 trap density ( cm -3 ) 4 3 2 45 degrees(simulation) 45 degrees(fitting curve) 55 degress(simulation) 55 degrees(fitting curve) 70 degrees(simulation) 70 degrees(fitting curve) 90 degrees(simulation) 90 degrees(fitting curve) 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Time (hrs) Fig. 10. Variation of Trap Density with Time. 5. Conclusions In this work, the characteristics of temporal drift in the spectral responsivity of HgCdTe photodetectors have been investigated and found to have an origin different from what has been reported in literature. The Dewar in which the detector is housed had been completely evacuated before the drifts are observed. This ensures that drifts observed have nothing to do with ice-formation. The source of drift as proposed in this paper is more critical owing to the difficulties in acquisition of infrared temperature measurements, however not the ice-formation. In this paper, it is demonstrated that the source of new drift is due to charge trapping effects and generation of radiation induced deep trap centers, which are meta-stable in nature. Experiments and simulations have been carried out to ascertain the cause of the drift and a theoretical model has been proposed which explains the characteristics of the drift phenomenon. It has been shown that due to the variation of radiation induced deep trap centers, effective carrier lifetime in the semiconductor changes and hence the drift effects are being observed. Acknowledgment Authors thank Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CTO, IIT Kanpur, for providing the necessary equipment s in conducting the experiments. References 1. Rogalski, A. (2005). HgCdTe infrared detector material: History, status, and outlook. Reports on Progress in Physics, 68(10), 2267-2336. 2. Dwivedi, A.D.D.; and P. Chakrabarti (2007). Modeling and Analysis of the Photo-conductive detectors based on Hg 1-x Cd x Te for free space optical Communication. Optical and Quantum Electronics, 39(8), 627-641.

Drift Effects in HgCdTe Detectors 481 3. Zhang, J.; Westerhout, R.J.; Tsen, G.K.O.; Antoszewski, J.; Yang, Y.; Dell, J.M.; and Faraone, L. (2008). Sidewall Effects of MBE Grown CdTe for MWIR HgCdTe Photoconductors. Conference on Optoelectronic and Microelectronic Materials and Devices (COMMAD 08), Sydney, Australia. 4. Siliquilini, J.F.; Musca, C.A.; Nener, B.D.; and Faraone, L. (1995), Temperature dependence of Hg0.68Cd0.32Te infrared photoconductor performance. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 42(8), 1441-1448. 5. Theocharous, E.; and Theocharous, O.J. (2006), Practical limit of the accuracy of radiometric measurements using HgCdTe detectors. Applied Optics, 45(30), 7753-7759. 6. Theocharous, E. (2006). On the stability of the spectral responsivity of cryogenically cooled HgCdTe infrared detectors. Infrared Physics and Technology, 48(3), 175-180. 7. Hatch, S.D.; Musca, C.A.; Becker, C.R.; Dell, J.M.; and Faraone, L. (2011). Photoresponse in photoconductor devices fabricated from HgTe-HgCdTe superlattices. Applied Physics Letters, 98(4), 043505-1- 043505-3. 8. Rogalski, A.; Antoszewski, J.; and Faraone, L. (2009). Third-generation infrared photodetector arrays. Journal of Applied Physics, 105(9), 091101-1- 091101-44. 9. Kodolbas, A.O.; Eray, A.; and Oktu, O. (2001). Effect of light-induced metastable defects on photo-carrier lifetime. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 69(4), 325-337. 10. Norton, P. (2002). HgCdTe infrared detectors. Opto-Electronics Review, 10(3), 159-174. 11. Pierre-Yves, E. (2009). HgCdTe Auger -Suppressed Infrared Detectors under Non-Equilibrium Operation. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan. 12. Pal, R.; Bhan, R.K.; Chhabra, K.C.; and Agnihotri, O.P. (1996). Analysis of the effect of surface passivant charges on HgCdTe photoconductive detectors. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 11(2), 231-237.