Protein-protein interactions and NMR: G protein/effector complexes

Similar documents
Protein-protein interactions by NMR

PROTEIN NMR SPECTROSCOPY

Principles of NMR Protein Spectroscopy. 2) Assignment of chemical shifts in a protein ( 1 H, 13 C, 15 N) 3) Three dimensional structure determination

Deuteration: Structural Studies of Larger Proteins

Resonance assignments in proteins. Christina Redfield

Labelling strategies in the NMR structure determination of larger proteins

Using NMR to study Macromolecular Interactions. John Gross, BP204A UCSF. Nov 27, 2017

NMR in Medicine and Biology

Triple Resonance Experiments For Proteins

3D NMR 3D NMR 3D NMR. Visualising 3D NMR spectra. strip plots. preparation mixing mixing t1 t2 t3 I S T I

Protein NMR. Bin Huang

BMB/Bi/Ch 173 Winter 2018

HADDOCK: High Ambiguity

Timescales of Protein Dynamics

Protein NMR. Part III. (let s start by reviewing some of the things we have learned already)

Filtered/edited NOESY spectra

Timescales of Protein Dynamics

Finding Bonds, H-bonds

- Basic understandings: - Mapping interactions:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Introduction solution NMR

NMR parameters intensity chemical shift coupling constants 1D 1 H spectra of nucleic acids and proteins

Accurate Characterisation of Weak Protein- Protein Interactions by Titration of NMR Residual Dipolar Couplings

NMR in Structural Biology

1. 3-hour Open book exam. No discussion among yourselves.

Biochemistry 530 NMR Theory and Practice. Gabriele Varani Department of Biochemistry and Department of Chemistry University of Washington

Sequential resonance assignments in (small) proteins: homonuclear method 2º structure determination

Sequential Assignment Strategies in Proteins

Name: BCMB/CHEM 8190, BIOMOLECULAR NMR FINAL EXAM-5/5/10

Sensitive NMR Approach for Determining the Binding Mode of Tightly Binding Ligand Molecules to Protein Targets

Interpreting and evaluating biological NMR in the literature. Worksheet 1

Supplementary Figure 1.

Table S1. Primers used for the constructions of recombinant GAL1 and λ5 mutants. GAL1-E74A ccgagcagcgggcggctgtctttcc ggaaagacagccgcccgctgctcgg

HSQC spectra for three proteins

Biochemistry 530 NMR Theory and Practice

Longitudinal-relaxation enhanced fast-pulsing techniques: New tools for biomolecular NMR spectroscopy

I690/B680 Structural Bioinformatics Spring Protein Structure Determination by NMR Spectroscopy

Jeff Grinstead SB 2006/2007. NMR Spectroscopy. NMR Spectroscopy JG/1 07

How to study the structure and dynamics of protein-rna complexes by NMR spectroscopy

Protein Structure Determination using NMR Spectroscopy. Cesar Trinidad

Basic principles of multidimensional NMR in solution

1) NMR is a method of chemical analysis. (Who uses NMR in this way?) 2) NMR is used as a method for medical imaging. (called MRI )

Protein dynamics from NMR Relaxation data

NMR-spectroscopy in solution - an introduction. Peter Schmieder

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) via NMR. Paola Turano

A.D.J. van Dijk "Modelling of biomolecular complexes by data-driven docking"

Basics of NMR Spectroscopy. Mark Maciejewski Nov 29, 2016

Theory and Applications of Residual Dipolar Couplings in Biomolecular NMR

Using cryoprobes to decrease acquisition times of triple-resonance experiments used for protein resonance assignments

Supplementary Materials for

Easy, Robust and Accurate NMR Analysis of Biomolecules using BioPack

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) via NMR. Paola Turano

Structural determination of biomolecular interfaces by nuclear magnetic resonance of proteins with reduced proton density

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Supporting Information. Copyright Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2009

Experimental Techniques in Protein Structure Determination

Supporting Information

Chemical Exchange and Ligand Binding

Structural characterization of complexes using NOESY experiments

NMR Resonance Assignment Assisted by Mass Spectrometry

Biochemistry 530 NMR Theory and Practice

Effects of Chemical Exchange on NMR Spectra

Acta Crystallographica Section D

Magic-Angle Spinning (MAS) drive bearing

BMB/Bi/Ch 173 Winter 2018

NMR Assay of Purity and Folding

8.2 The Nuclear Overhauser Effect

NMR-spectroscopy of proteins in solution. Peter Schmieder

Supporting Information

Assignment of Heme Resonances and. High- and Low-Spin Nitrophorin 2 by 1 H and. Order of Heme Methyl Resonances in High- Spin Ferriheme Proteins

Biochemistry,530:,, Introduc5on,to,Structural,Biology, Autumn,Quarter,2015,

Effects of Chemical Exchange on NMR Spectra

Magnetic Resonance Lectures for Chem 341 James Aramini, PhD. CABM 014A

The wonderful world of NUCLEIC ACID NMR!

NMR study of complexes between low molecular mass inhibitors and the West Nile virus NS2B-NS3 protease

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectrum of Deamino-Lysine-Vasopressin in Aqueous Solution and Its Structural Implications

THE NUCLEAR OVERHAUSER EFFECT IN STRUCTURAL AND CONFORMATIONAL ANALYSIS

COSY type experiments exploring through-bond homonuclear correlations

Solid-state NMR and proteins : basic concepts (a pictorial introduction) Barth van Rossum,

Biophysical Journal, Volume 96. Supporting Material

Molecular Modeling lecture 2

Protein Structure Determination Using NMR Restraints BCMB/CHEM 8190

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR)

Macromolecular X-ray Crystallography

Solving the three-dimensional solution structures of larger

NMR Spectroscopy: A Quantum Phenomena

Tips & Tricks around temperature

Applications of the NOE in Molecular Biology

Residual Dipolar Couplings BCMB/CHEM 8190

Guided Prediction with Sparse NMR Data

Chapter 6. The interaction of Src SH2 with the focal adhesion kinase catalytic domain studied by NMR

Evaluation of the Utility of NMR Structures Determined from Minimal NOE-Based Restraints for Structure-Based Drug Design, Using MMP-1 as an Example

PROTEIN'STRUCTURE'DETERMINATION'

Automated Projection Spectroscopy and Its Applications

Use of deuterium labeling in NMR: overcoming a sizeable problem Michael Sattler and Stephen W Fesik*

Spectroscopy in Organic Chemistry. Types of Spectroscopy in Organic

Supplementary Materials for

Solution Structure of Syrian Hamster Prion Protein rprp(90-231)

Algorithms for analysis of NMR projections: Design, implementation and applications

Structural basis for catalytically restrictive dynamics of a high-energy enzyme state

Transcription:

Protein-protein interactions and NMR: G protein/effector complexes Helen Mott 5th CCPN Annual Conference, August 2005 Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Fast k on,off >> (ν free - ν bound ) A + B k on k off AB k on,off ~ (ν free - ν bound ) Slow k on,off << (ν free - ν bound ) να free να bound

15 N-HSQC: Titration of Unlabelled Peptide into Labelled Protein 1:0 1:0.1 Fast 1:0.3 Intermediate Slow? 1:0.5 1:1.0 Fast/ Intermediate

15 N-HSQC: Titration of Unlabelled Peptide into Labelled Protein 1:0 1:0.1 Fast 1:0.3 Intermediate Slow? 1:0.5 1:1.0 Fast/ Intermediate 1:1.2

Measure K d e.g. fluorescence, ITC, Biacore, NMR Minimize interacting region, if necessary e.g. limited proteolysis Find conditions where both components are stable and interaction still occurs (e.g. salt, ph dependence) and exchange regime is favourable Add unlabelled component in excess to saturate the other component Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Information attainable depends on the strength of the complex Structures of protein complexes Dynamics of interactions Mapping interactions e.g. for mutagenesis studies Extracting distance information (transferred NOE) Docking strong strong weak or strong weak or strong weak or strong Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Differential Labelling Schemes Labelled with 13 C, 15 N Unlabelled 12 C, 14 N 13 C H H 12 C Simplification of spectra 13 C H H 12 C Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Cdc42 + Cdc42/ACK Complex ACK Free 15N-labelled ACK 15N-ACK + unlabelled Cdc42 110.0 112.0 114.0 116.0 118.0 120.0 122.0 124.0 126.0 110.0 112.0 114.0 116.0 118.0 120.0 122.0 124.0 126.0 10.5 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 10.5 10.0 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5

Tight Complexes: Slow Exchange (the ideal case) Chemical Shift Assignments 1. Backbone experiments: HSQC, HNCA, HN(CO)CA, HNCACB, CBCA(CO)NH recorded on each component of complex 2. Sidechain experiments: 15 N-separated TOCSY, HCCH-TOCSY CC(CO)NH, H(CCCO)NH, HBHA(CBCA)(CO)NH on each component of the complex 3. Coupling constant experiments: HNHA on each component of the complex

Tight Complexes: Slow Exchange (the non-ideal case) Chemical Shift Assignments 1. Backbone experiments require full deuteration and TROSY: HSQC, HNCA, HN(CO)CA, HNCACB, HN(CO)CACB, HNCO, HNCACO 2. Sidechain experiments: CC(CO)NH (on deuterated sample) On protonated sample: HCCH-TOCSY, 15 N-separated NOESY (to guess shifts of sidechain 1 H) 3. Coupling constants: experiments do not work, use all shifts (including CO) to put into Talos. Full set of assignments of the free protein(s) is necessary

NOE Data (in all cases) 2 types of experiment: Edited or separated: keep 1 H attached to nucleus X 13 C and 15 N-separated NOESYs NOEs between 13 C-attached protons and NOEs between 13 C-attached and 12 C- attached protons Filtered or rejected: keep 1 H NOT attached to nucleus X X-filtered NOESY NOEs between 13 C- 1 H and 12 C- 1 H, 14 N- 1 H Doubly-rejected NOESY/TOCSY 12 C- 1 H/ 14 N- 1 H

X-filtered Experiments Two basic types: a) Schemes where X-attached 1 H are removed directly 1 H 1/2J X e.g. generate MQC b) Schemes where interleaved experiments are recorded and have to be added or subtracted to keep or discard X-attached 1 H 1 H X X-pulse present or absent in alternating experiments

All 13 C-filtered experiments suffer because 1 J CH varies: 120-145 Hz aliphatic CH; 160-220 Hz aromatic CH 1 delays are inevitably only tuned to one J coupling 220 200 180 1 J CH (Hz) 160 140 aliphatic His Tyr, Phe, Trp 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 δ 13 C (ppm) 1 J CH = (0.365 ± 0.01 Hz/ppm) δc + 120.0 ± 0.5 Hz 1 J CH = A δc + B Zwahlen et al (1997) JACS 119 6711-6721

Adiabatic pulses Trajectory of 13 C magnetization follows effective field for duration of the pulse Carrier frequency of the pulse starts far upfield, sweeps through resonance, then downfield 13 C resonate at different frequencies so they are all inverted at different times, depending on their frequency and the sweep rate and duration of the inversion pulse

Purge scheme with adiabatic pulse 1 H 13 C G a Hy + Iy G1 1 /2 1 /2 From a to b: t G1 b G2 13 C spin inverted at time t (t 0) after 1 H 180 pulse 1 J CH evolution occurs for a time 1-2t 1 J CH and t vary for each 13 C nucleus Hy + IycosπJ IS ( 1-2t) - 2IxSzsinπJ IS ( 1-2t) 90 ( 1 H) Hz + IzcosπJ IS ( 1-2t) - 2IxSzsinπJ IS ( 1-2t) IzcosπJ IS ( 1-2t) = 0 for all spins 1-2t = 1/(2 1 J CH ) (i) removed by G2 Since t 0 and 1 J CH is smallest for upfield 13 C (i.e. methyls), these must be inverted first. 1 is set close to 1/2 1 J CH (methyl) 1 J CH = Aδ C + B (ii) (A=0.365 Hz/ppm; B = 120.0 Hz) Frequency of the transmitter δ RF (t) = δc. Substitute for 1 J CH in (i) 1-2t = 1/[2(Aδ RF + B)] time derivative to get sweep rate during WURST Zwahlen et al (1997) JACS 119 6711-6721

3D 13 C-filtered, 13 C-edited NOESY-HSQC ( X-filter ) Two of these modules at the start of the sequence Suppression factors are 100-140-fold Putting filter modules at the start of the sequence makes H 2 O suppression easier No decoupling during T1 ( 1 H evolution) to detect breakthrough 15 N filter at the same time as the 13 C filter

2 Issues with the X-filter experiment 1. It has to be referenced in both proton dimensions 2. It has to be calibrated for structure calculation and there are no reference distances Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Structure calculation strategies (1) Assignment of intra-molecular NOEs in 13 C- and 15 N-separated spectra: check that they do not have any inter-molecular possibility (they may not appear in X-filter if they are weak) Ambiguous NOEs that appear in 13 C-edited NOESY as well as X-filter, 13 C-edited NOESY should be treated in the same way as other ambiguous NOEs as they may contain intra-molecular contribution to the intensity Check for the other things that appear in the X-filter experiment: Thr/Ser-OH ~ 5ppm Tyr-OH ~9ppm Cys-SH ~1ppm! In larger proteins, X-filter only really works for methyl groups Watch out for the artefacts..

Structure calculation strategies (2) Dealing with all the data - generation of restraints minimum 5-6 NOESY datasets all with different contributing atoms: the possibilities must be edited for the different experiment types e.g. 13 C-edited NOESY: F1/F3 = 13 CH only; F2 = any 1 H Starting from two extended chains with ideal geometry not lying on top of each other (bias starting structures) Starting from the free structures do not bias initial intermolecular possibilities with orientation.

Cdc42-21 kda small G protein of the Rho family GTP cofactor replaced by GMPPNP PAK - 5kDa fragment - can be expressed as GST-fusion K d ~ 30nM Samples: 15 N Cdc42 + unlabelled PAK 15 N, 13 C Cdc42 + unlabelled PAK 15 N PAK + unlabelled Cdc42 15 N, 13 C PAK + unlabelled Cdc42 no deuteration required - all experiments worked 3D X-filtered, 13 C-edited NOESY ran on 13 C, 15 N PAK, unlabelled Cdc42

13 C-separated NOESY (intra- and intermolecular) 13 C-filtered, 13 C-separated NOESY (inter-molecular only)

Summary of Cdc42/PAK Intermolecular NOEs Unambiguous Ambiguous 13 C-filter/ 13 C-edited 32 29 13 C-NOESY (PAK) 67 73 13 C-NOESY (Cdc42) 21 40 15 N-NOESY (PAK) 19 5 15 N-NOESY (Cdc42) 7 12 Total Intermolecular 146 159 Total number of NOEs = 4,000

HR1b domain of PRK1 complexed with Rac1 small GTPase HR1b Rac1

Hr1b/Rac1 (30 kda) Correlation time ~20 nsec 100% deuteration for backbone assignment of Rac (methyl protonation too expensive) HR1b 13 C/ 15 N labelling only Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Methyl group intermolecular NOEs 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 8 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 X-filter artifacts -dispersive diagonal 6 6 7 7 8 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 8 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

0 0 Arg Cδ/Hδ 1 1 Hγ 2 2 3 3 Hδ Hδ X-filter artifacts 4 4 - water exchange peaks - incomplete suppression of strong crosspeaks H 2 O 5 5 6 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 6 4.0 3.8 3.6 3.4 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

HR1b/Rac Very few NOEs in X-filter experiments on HR1b side (9 out of 62) HR1b proton shifts overlapped No aromatics in interface Only 2 Rac residues in the interface have methyl groups Interaction between two helices - no intermolecular NOEs in 15 N- separated NOESY ( 2 H Rac/ 1 H HR1b) Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

X-filter experiments work best for hydrophobic interfaces, with methyl groups and aromatics For larger complexes, -CH3 and flexible residues give NOEs (ILV approaches should help) For interfaces dominated by salt bridges the NOEs in the 13 C-separated X-filter experiment will be extremely sparse Intermolecular β-sheet interfaces - 15 N-separated NOESY on 100% 2 H/ 15 N labelled protein mixed with unlabelled partner Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Cross-saturation Takahashi et al (2000) Nat. Struc. Biol. 7 220-223 Protein II Protein I Strong binding case R.F. -NH -CH - 15 NH -C 2 H Band-selective proton saturation, followed by TROSY-HSQC cross-saturation Saturate the aliphatics of protein II - magnetization transferred by spin diffusion to the aromatics and amides. Cross-saturation to the 15 NH in the interface on protein I Measure intensity in HSQC vs time of saturation to find residues in interface More precise than chemical shift mapping Drawbacks Cys-SH also saturated, transferred within protein I Spin diffusion between NH in protein I Department of Biochemistry University of Cambridge

Using NMR data for docking Structures of components are known Use NMR data to map binding contacts or determine relative orientation of components

Sec5 NMR Structure ~0.5Å RMSD C N

Sec5/Ral Titration - all slow exchange 1:0 1:0.5 1:1.0

Definition of Residues in the Contact Site Pick all the peaks in free and bound and calculate combined shift difference in 15 N and 1 H shifts, often defined as: [( 15 N) 2 + 10( 1 H) 2 ] 1/2 Define significant chemical shift perturbation (>1 SD from average shift change) - add in the ones that have disappeared completely Check for solvent accessibility (e.g. NACCESS): NHs that are completely buried are unlikely to be involved in the interaction but are experiencing secondary effects, unless there is a significant structural change (should be obvious from the HSQC). NACCESS cutoff: if the residue is more than 50% exposed it is available for interaction.

Shift changes after accessibility filtering

Using Chemical Shift Mapping Data for Docking (HADDOCK) Take significant shift changes, screened by solvent accessibility Active residues Take residues close to active residues on the surface Passive residues Ambiguous interactive restraint (AIR) N atoms N res B N atoms ( ) (-1/6) d iab = Σ Σ Σ 1 d 6 m ia =1 k=1 n kb =1 m ia n kb between any atom m of active residue i in protein A (m ia ) and any atom n of both active and passive residues k (N res total) of protein B (n kb ) and inversely for protein B. For each active residue (i) in A, restraint to any active or passive residue (k) in B, over all atoms and vice versa. Dominguez et al (2003) J Am Chem Soc 125 1731-1737

HADDOCK calculation strategy (i) Randomization of orientations and rigid body energy minimization (ii) Semi-rigid simulated annealing (iii) Refinement with explicit solvent Models clustered by interaction energies (E elec, E vdw, E AIR ) and average buried surface area Lowest energy cluster with the highest buried surface area assumed to be correct Can also add RDCs, inter-molecular NOEs and radius of gyration term to prevent expansion at the interface (Clore(2003) JACS 125 2902-12)

Sec5: chemical shift mapping data (active) and nearest neighbours (passive) Ral: 3 mutations published (active) switch regions (passive) Ral: model based on Ras Lowest energy/highest buried SA cluster Second lowest was 180 rotation Ral Sec5

Haddock-derived model 2.1Å Crystal Structure Ral Sec5 Ral Sec5

Acknowledgements Darerca Owen Louise Hopkins HR1b/Rac complex Rakhee Modha Daniel Nietlispach Ernest Laue Cdc42/PAK Angela Morreale Meenakshi Venkatesan Sec5 Jacques Camonis Medical Research Council NMR Facility: BBSRC Wellcome Trust