EAST ASIA AND PACIFIC China Transport Global Practice IBRD/IDA Specific Investment Loan FY 2010 Seq No: 7 ARCHIVED on 28-Jun-2015 ISR18605 Implementing Agencies: Wuhan Urban Construction Utilization of Foreign Investment Project Management Office Key Dates Key Project Dates Board Approval date:30-mar-2010 Planned Mid Term Review Date:31-Dec-2013 Original Closing Date:31-Dec-2015 Effectiveness Date:07-Sep-2010 Actual Mid-Term Review Date:20-Dec-2013 Revised Closing Date:31-Dec-2015 Project Development Objectives Project Development Objective (from Project Appraisal Document) The objective of the Project is to assist the Borrower's Municipality of Wuhan to enhance mobility for passenger trips within and to the central area of Wuhan in an environmentally sustainable, integrated and safe manner. Has the Project Development Objective been changed since Board Approval of the Project Objective? No PHRPDODEL Components Name Public Transport (PT):(Cost $53.97 M) Road Safety (RS):(Cost $11.17 M) Road Improvement (RI):(Cost $960.02 M) Travel Demand Management (TDM):(Cost $5.61 M) Institutional Development (ID) Component:(Cost $4.04 M) Overall Ratings Name Previous Rating Current Rating Progress towards achievement of PDO Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory Overall Implementation Progress (IP) Moderately Unsatisfactory Moderately Unsatisfactory 6/28/2015 Page 1 of 15
Overall Risk Rating -- Substantial Implementation Status and Key Decisions This ISR is the first after a second-order restructuring that was processed to address issues affecting project implementation. The restructuring included the following changes: (i) amend the scope of the Public Transport and Road Safety Components; (ii) amend funding arrangements for the Road Improvement Component; (iii) extend the Loan Closing Date by 20 months to August 31, 2017; (iv) reallocate loan proceeds between disbursement categories, with an increase in disbursement percentage for civil works from 50% to 90%; and (v) modify the Results Framework to reflect the revised project scope and improve the measurement of the results indicators. The Restructuring Paper for this second order restructuring will become a public document soon. 6/28/2015 Page 2 of 15
6/28/2015 Page 3 of 15
Risks Systematic Operations Risk-rating Tool Risk Category Rating at Approval Previous Rating Current Rating Political and Governance -- -- Low Macroeconomic -- -- Low Sector Strategies and Policies -- -- High Technical Design of Project or Program -- -- Moderate Institutional Capacity for Implementation and Sustainability -- -- Substantial Fiduciary -- -- Moderate Environment and Social -- -- Low Stakeholders -- -- Low Other -- -- -- Overall -- -- Substantial Results Project Development Objective Indicators PHINDPDOTBL 1. Modal share of public transport (bus and metro) on targeted PT corridors (Percentage, Custom) Value -- -- -- -- PHINDPDOTBL 1.2. Hanyang Avenue (sub-indicator) (Percentage, Custom Breakdown) 6/28/2015 Page 4 of 15
Value 31.00 -- -- 35.00 PHINDPDOTBL 1.1. Heping Avenue (sub-indicator) (Percentage, Custom Breakdown) Value 27.00 -- -- 31.00 PHINDPDOTBL 2. Average number of fatalities per year on four Road Safety corridors (Number, Custom) Value 22.00 -- -- 18.00 PHINDPDOTBL 3. Average peak hour travel time on Jiefang Avenue (Huangpu Lu/Dibian Lu) and on the Shuidong Section of the 2nd Ring Road (Number, Custom) Value -- -- -- -- PHINDPDOTBL 3.2. on the Shuidong Section of the 2nd Ring Road (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 22.00 -- -- 15.00 6/28/2015 Page 5 of 15
PHINDPDOTBL 3.1. on Jiefang Avenue (Huangpu Lu/Dibian Lu) (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 45.00 -- -- 35.00 Overall Comments The M&E Framework was restructured as part of the second order restructuring of the project. The restructuring did not change the PDO. The results framework was changed to reflect the restructured project scope and improve the measurement of the indicators. Some of the original monitoring indicators in the PAD were not easily measurable and the PMO was not able to gather data to evaluate and report on implementation progress. As a result, the reporting on this project has been weak and warrants a significant adjustment to ensure that the outcomes of the proposed restructured project can be properly recorded at the completion stage. As a result, the PMO will start measuring these indicators and will report in the next months. Therefore, there are no updated values at this point, right after the restructuring was approved. Intermediate Results Indicators 1. Average walking time between bus and metro stations in Heping Avenue and Hanyang Avenue (Minutes, Custom) Value -- -- -- -- Date -- 24-Jun-2015 24-Jun-2015 -- 1.2. on Hanyang Avenue (sub-indicator) (Minutes, Custom Breakdown) Value 2.00 -- -- 1.80 6/28/2015 Page 6 of 15
1.1. on Heping Avenue (sub-indicator) (Minutes, Custom Breakdown) Value 2.00 -- -- 1.80 2. % of bus stops targeted on PT corridors with enhanced accessibility for vulnerable users (Percentage, Custom) Value -- -- -- -- 2.2. Hanyang Avenue (sub-indicator) (Percentage, Custom Breakdown) Value 56.00 -- -- 90.00 2.1. Heping Avenue (sub-indicator) (Percentage, Custom Breakdown) Value 76.00 -- -- 90.00 6/28/2015 Page 7 of 15
3. Number of public transport terminals, interchanges and transfer facility completed (Number, Custom) Value 0.00 -- 0.00 3.00 Date 31-Dec-2008 -- 24-Jun-2015 31-Aug-2017 4. Number of intersections with traffic signals with pedestrian phase on RS corridors (Number, Custom) Value 7.00 32.00 32.00 38.00 4.4. Baishazhou Avenue (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 5.00 5.00 7.00 4.3. Xudong Dajie/No. 2 Yangtze Bridge (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 6/28/2015 Page 8 of 15
4.2. Hanyang Avenue (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 4.00 7.00 7.00 10.00 4.1. Heping Avenue (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 3.00 18.00 18.00 19.00 5. Number of unsignalized zebras on RS corridors converted to non-conflicting crossings (including signalized mid-block crossings, footbridges and underpasses) (Number, Custom) Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 32.00 5.4. Baishazhou Avenue (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 6/28/2015 Page 9 of 15
5.3. Xudong Dajie/No. 2 Yangtze Bridge (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 5.2. Hanyang Avenue (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 5.1. Heping Avenue (sub-indicator) (Number, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00 6. Length of road with improved or new constructed physical separation between motorized and non-motorized vehicle flow on RS corridors (Kilometers, Custom) Value -- -- -- -- 6/28/2015 Page 10 of 15
6.4. Baishazhou Avenue (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 -- -- 4.00 6.3. Xudong Dajie/No. 2 Yangtze Bridge (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 -- -- 3.50 6.2. Hanyang Avenue (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 -- -- 2.80 6.1. Heping Avenue (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 -- -- 3.00 6/28/2015 Page 11 of 15
7. Length of roads improved/constructed of three key links (Shuidong Section of the 2 Ring Road, Jiefang Avenue (shorter than original) and Shuidong Road) completed (Kilometers, Custom) Value -- -- -- -- Date -- -- -- -- 7.3. Shuidong Section of the 2 Ring Road (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 3.30 3.30 3.40 7.2. Jiefang Avenue (Huangpu Road Dijiao Garden Road) (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 -- -- 6.80 7.1. Shuidong Road (sub-indicator) (Kilometers, Custom Breakdown) Value 0.00 3.40 3.40 3.40 6/28/2015 Page 12 of 15
8. % of systems installed for traffic management on four Yangtze River bridges and three Hanjiang River bridges (Percentage, Custom) Value 0.00 90.00 90.00 100.00 9. Definition and adoption of a bus route optimization strategy (Text, Custom) Value No strategy In progress In progress Definition and adoption of a bus route optimization strategy 10. Definition and adoption of systematic parking pricing policy and a hierarchical parking zonal system (Text, Custom) Value No systematic parking pricing policy and a hierarchical parking zonal system In progress In progress Definition and adoption of systematic parking pricing policy and a hierarchical parking zonal system Date 31-Dec-2008 13-Oct-2014 24-Jun-2015 31-Aug-2017 11. Number of staff trained on selected topics (in line with capacity building program) with positive assessment of training (Percentage, Custom) Value 0.00 -- -- 1000.00 6/28/2015 Page 13 of 15
12. Non-motorized vehicles study completed (Yes/No, Custom) Value N Y Y Y Overall Comments The M&E Framework was restructured as part of the second order restructuring of the project and it included updating the intermediate indicators. For some intermediate there is data and it is reported. For others, measurement will start and the PMO will report in the next months. Data on Financial Performance Disbursements (by loan) Project Loan/Credit/TF Status Currency Original Revised Cancelled Disbursed Undisbursed Disbursed P112838 IBRD-78640 Effective USD 100.00 100.00 0.00 52.01 47.99 52% Key Dates (by loan) Project Loan/Credit/TF Status Approval Date Signing Date Effectiveness Date Orig. Closing Date Rev. Closing Date P112838 IBRD-78640 Effective 30-Mar-2010 11-Jun-2010 07-Sep-2010 31-Dec-2015 31-Dec-2015 Cumulative Disbursements 6/28/2015 Page 14 of 15
Restructuring History Level 2 Approved on 26-Jun-2015 Related Project(s) There are no related projects. 6/28/2015 Page 15 of 15