The 14 Nov 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake: Surface rupture... and much more

Similar documents
The Seismic Hazardscape of New Zealand

Shattering a plate boundary: the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake

The 14 Nov 2016 M 7.8 Kaikoura, South Island, New Zealand Earthquake: Notes from the Field. Mark Hemphill-Haley - Humboldt State University

THE M W KAIKŌURA EARTHQUAKE: SURFACE FAULT RUPTURE AND SEISMIC HAZARD CONTEXT

SOURCES, GROUND MOTION AND STRUCTURAL RESPONSE CHARACTERISTICS IN WELLINGTON OF THE 2013 COOK STRAIT EARTHQUAKES

Time-varying and long-term mean aftershock hazard in Wellington

The National Seismic Hazard Model, NZS1170, & the M7.1, 4 Sept 2010 Darfield Earthquake. Mark Stirling, Graeme McVerry, & Matt Gerstenberger

2016 Kaikoura Earthquake (NZ) Effects & Phenomena. Trevor Matuschka With special acknowledgement Dan Forster (Damsafety Intelligence)

Jocelyn Karen Campbell

M7.8 Kaikōura earthquake one year on

LANDSLIDES CAUSED BY THE MW7.8 KAIKŌURA EARTHQUAKE AND THE IMMEDIATE RESPONSE

Incorporating simulated Hikurangi subduction interface spectra into probabilistic hazard calculations for Wellington

The Impact of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake on the Geodetic Infrastructure in New Zealand 1

Imaging Unknown Faults in Christchurch, New Zealand, after a M6.2 Earthquake

Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid Earth

The 2016 Valentine s Day Mw 5.7 Christchurch earthquake: Preliminary report

This is a repository copy of Complex multi-fault rupture during the 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura earthquake, New Zealand.

Wellington Whose Fault?

Modelling Strong Ground Motions for Subduction Events in the Wellington Region, New Zealand

Source studies of the ongoing ( ) sequence of recent large earthquakes in Canterbury

Ground motion modelling of a large subduction interface earthquake in Wellington, New Zealand

Illustrations of historic and pre-historic surface rupture of active faults in New Zealand

which illustrates how exploration seismic technology can be applied in the case of a societal need. Summary

Quantifying the effect of declustering on probabilistic seismic hazard

Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion

A NEW PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD MODEL FOR NEW ZEALAND

The Tectonic Setting of New Zealand

Ground Motion Comparison of the 2011 Tohoku, Japan and Canterbury earthquakes: Implications for large events in New Zealand.

Slide 1: Earthquake sequence (with colour coding around big events and subsequent period). Illustrates migration to the east initially into

Going Down II: Estimating co-seismic subsidence in the Hutt Valley resulting from rupture of the Wellington Fault

Impact of Source Model on Earthquake Hazard and Insurance Risk in New Zealand

The 2003, M W 7.2 Fiordland Earthquake, and its nearsource aftershock strong motion data

Representative ground-motion ensembles for several major earthquake scenarios in New Zealand

crustal structure experiment beneath Wairarapa - Wellington area: results from SAHKE

Basics of the modelling of the ground deformations produced by an earthquake. EO Summer School 2014 Frascati August 13 Pierre Briole

Sendai Earthquake NE Japan March 11, Some explanatory slides Bob Stern, Dave Scholl, others updated March

SURFACE RUPTURE OF THE GREENDALE FAULT DURING THE DARFIELD (CANTERBURY) EARTHQUAKE, NEW ZEALAND: INITIAL FINDINGS

Earthquakes and Faulting

Earthquakes and Seismotectonics Chapter 5

Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

Lifelines mitigation in Hawke s Bay

S. Toda, S. Okada, D. Ishimura, and Y. Niwa International Research Institute of Disaster Science, Tohoku University, Japan

Magnitude 6.3 SOUTH ISLAND OF NEW ZEALAND

Magnitude 7.7 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION

Abstract. Betsie Hopper a and Brendan Duffy b a Colorado College, b Department of Geology, University of Canterbury

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Geoscience Society of New Zealand Hochstetter Lecture Presented by: Russ Van Dissen (on behalf of the It s Our Fault team)

The Canterbury Earthquakes: Scientific answers to critical questions

Differentiating earthquake tsunamis from other sources; how do we tell the difference?

GEM Faulted Earth. A Global Active Fault and Fault Source Database

Description of faults

Magnitude 7.0 N of ANCHORAGE, ALASKA

(First Edition: prepared on 29/12/2003)

Mw 7.8, Southwest of Sumatra, Indonesia Wed, 2 March 2016 at 12:49:48 UTC M /03/03

Tsunami Simulation of 2009 Dusky Sound Earthquake in New Zealand

BEFORE THE INDEPENDENT HEARING COMMISSIONERS

This seminar is jointly presented by the Body Corporate Chairs Group, the Wellington Inner City Associa>on and the Wellington City Council.

The New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model: Rethinking PSHA

Elastic rebound theory

A Spatial Analysis of Modern and. Paleo Rockfall. Purau, Lyttelton Harbour, New Zealand. Laura Stamp 1,2, Josh Borella 1, Sam Hampton 1

Characterisation of late Quaternary displacements on the Waitangi Fault at Aviemore Dam, New Zealand

Assessment of Seismic Design Motions in Areas of Low Seismicity: Comparing Australia and New Zealand

Elastic Rebound Theory

Design Spectra for the Reconstruction of Christchurch

8.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

GEOLOGY MEDIA SUITE Chapter 13

Modeling earthquake hazard and risk in Australia and New Zealand

Geomorphic Deformation of a Small Glaciofluvial Basin by an Upstream-Facing Thrust Fault over Multiple Glacial Cycles

The Earthquake of Padang, Sumatra of 30 September 2009 scientific information and update

Preliminary report on the Canterbury Earthquake South Island of New Zealand , M 6.3

What is an Earthquake?

Low-Latency Earthquake Displacement Fields for Tsunami Early Warning and Rapid Response Support

GROUND MOTION MAPS BASED ON RECORDED MOTIONS FOR THE EARTHQUAKES IN THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE

Chapter 2. Earthquake and Damage

Did a submarine landslide contribute to the 2011 Tohoku tsunami?

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

Crustal deformation by the Southeast-off Kii Peninsula Earthquake

Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

Alpine Fault Magnitude 8 Hazard Scenario

Case study of Japan: Reference Frames in Practice

Hosgri-San Simeon Fault Zone Geologic Slip Rate

An analysis of the Kefalonia seismic sequence of Jan Feb. 3, 2014

Earthquakes. Building Earth s Surface, Part 2. Science 330 Summer What is an earthquake?

Active Tectonics. Earthquakes, Uplift, and Landscape. Edward A. Keller University of California, Santa Barbara

Magnitude 7.0 PAPUA, INDONESIA

What Drives Seismic Risk in New Zealand? Insights from a nextgeneration

Magnitude 7.0 NEW CALEDONIA

2 Model and Methods We employ a fully-dynamic rupture simulation using the Fast-Domain-Partitioning Boundary Integral equation method (FDP-BIEM)

A. Kaiser, C. Holden & C. Massey

ESTIMATES OF HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1999 TAIWAN EARTHQUAKE

Working group. Study of the evolution of the seismic cycle of stress and strain to. Main areas of study. Research lines

Case Study 1: 2014 Chiang Rai Sequence

Gisborne 2007 earthquake tectonics and strong-motion records. In the Pacific plate subducting beneath the North Island

GPS Strain & Earthquakes Unit 5: 2014 South Napa earthquake GPS strain analysis student exercise

THE EFFECT OF THE LATEST SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE TO MALAYSIAN PENINSULAR

Kinematics of the Southern California Fault System Constrained by GPS Measurements

UGRC 144 Science and Technology in Our Lives/Geohazards

Transcription:

The 14 Nov 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikoura Earthquake: Surface rupture... and much more Pilar Villamor on behalf of the Earthquake Geology Response Team (54): Adrian Benson, Alan Bischoff, Alex Hatem, Andrea Barrier, Andy Nicol, Anekant Wandres, Biljana Lukovic, Brendan Hall, Caleb Gasston, Callum Margetts, Cam Asher, Chris Grimshaw, Chris Madugo, Clark Fenton, Dan Hale, David Barrell, David Heron, Delia Strong, Dougal Townsend, Duncan Noble, Jamie Howarth, Jarg Pettinga, Jesse Kearse, Jack Williams, Joel Bensing, John Manousakis, Josh Borella, Joshu Mountjoy, Julie Rowland, Kate Clark, Kate Pedley, Katrina Sauer, Kelvin Berryman, Mark Hemphill-Haley, Mark Stirling, Marlene Villeneuve, Matt Cockroft, Narges Khajavi, Nick Griffiths, Philip Barnes, Pilar Villamor, Rachel Carne, Robert Langridge, Robert Zinke, Russ van Dissen, Sam McColl, Simon Cox, Steve Lawson, Tim Little, Tim Stahl, Ursula Cochran, Virgina Toy, William Ries, Zoe Juniper

14 November Kaikoura Earthquake This talk - Background - Kaikoura Earthquake - Seismicity, ground motions - InSAR and GNSS - Preliminary rupture models - Surface Rupture - Tsunami, Landslides (if we have time..) Photo: Sally Dellow, Surface rupture of the Papatea Fault displacing the coastal platform, road, railway and hill country.

Background The 14 Nov event occurred in the region between the Hikurangi subduction system of the North Island and the oblique collisional regime of the South Island (Alpine Fault)

Background The 14 Nov event ruptured several faults that expand into different tectonic domains: o The strike-slip Marlborough fault system consists of a series of right lateral strike-slip faults, some with reverse component, that link to the Alpine fault on the west and to the subduction margin fore-arc to the east. Net fault slip rate varies from 0.1 to 25 mm/yr. The contractional North Canterbury Fault Zone has mixed fault orientations (northerly and easterly) and fault types (reverse faulting and folding and strikeslip). Net fault slip rate varies from 0.1 to 3.5 mm/yr (poorly constrained). The subduction zone terminates in close proximity to the area that ruptured during 14 Nov. Litchfield et al 2014

2016 2010 Pettinga et al., 2001 Historic Seismicity Tectonic domains

ACTIVE FAULTS Known active faults and rates North Canterbury faults Onshore Hundalee, c. 0.5-1.5 mm/yr The Humps,?? Lowry, c. 0.5-1.5 mm/yr Kaiwara, c. 0.2-1.2 mm/yr Offshore NorthCant10, c. 1-3 NorthCant13 c. 0.3 mm/yr NorthCant8, c. 0.1-0.4 mm/yr Marlborough faults dextral slip rates Onshore Wairau, c. 3 mm/yr Awatere, c. 6 mm/yr Clarence, c. 3 mm/yr Hope Fault, c. 20-30 mm/yr Kekerengu, c. 20-26 mm/yr Offshore Needles, c. 16 mm/yr Chancet, c. 3 mm/yr Vernon, c. 4.5 mm/yr Nicholson B., c. 11 mm/yr Boo Boo, c. 11 mm/yr

Geodetic strain Area Strain with Scaled Force Arrows Log Shear Strain max(-2.5,log10 (shear strain))- with Principal Contraction Directions John Haines and Laura Wallace in prep.

The 14 November 2016 Mw 7.8 Earthquake Location and aftershocks Up to Friday 25 th November Two M6+ aftershocks (largest M6.3) occurred within two hours of the mainshock. Focal Mechanisms Mainshock thrust mechanism Aftershock mechanisms thrust and strike-slip John Ristau Epicentre M7.8 Stephen Bannister

Ground Motions: Intensity New Zealand ShakeMap: MM VIII, isolated pockets of MM IX Nick Horspool GeoNet, 15000+ felt reports

Ground Motions: Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) PGA confirmed up to 1.3g (Ward station) Horizontal PGA > 1g recorded in the top of the South Island (Ward, Kekerengu) and the epicentral region (Waiau). Lower accelerations recorded in Kaikoura Ground shaking significantly lower in Christchurch than Wellington due to northward rupture from epicentre and distribution of fault slip Anna Kaiser

InSAR observations from ALOS-2 Using radar satellites orbiting at 700 km we measure the displacement of the Earth s surface by measuring the change in the path length between two radar acquisitions. Each contour represents 11.5 cm of ground motion either towards or away from the satellite 3D Displacement field derived from Sentinel-1 radar amplitude. Ian Hamling

Coseismic geodetic measurements Hmax: 6m; Vmax: 2m Horizontal Vertical Sigrun Hreinsdottir et al (preliminary 6/12/16)

Geodetic Fault Model Sentinel Preliminary slip model derived from InSAR and GPS data. Despite the current model explaining 94% of the total data variance, significant residuals remain, further highlighting the complexity of the rupture. Ian Hamling

Kinematic Fault Model (Preliminary) Inversion of strong motion data for slip and timing of rupture on pre-defined fault segments (based on the preliminary geodetic fault model). Caroline Holden South to North rupture across multiple fault segments VIDEO http://info.geonet.org.nz/display/quake/2016/11/23/watching+ the+m7.8+kaikoura+quake+dominos+fall+in+real+time

Observed fault ruptures and amount of displacement (m) The Humps fault zone- up to H:2 V:2 Hundalee fault- up to H: 3.7 V: >2 Hope fault up to H: 0.5 V:0.5 Papatea fault up to H:5 & V:8 Jordan Thrust-? Kekerengu up to H: 10. V: 2.5 Needles fault? Fidget fault?

The Humps-Leader Fault What did we know The Humps fault was mapped as active (AFDB), not included and a fault source in the NSHM (National Seismic Hazard Model) but Mmax for floating eq in this area in the Mw 7s Faulting in the area is strikeslip and reverse Active fault trace: AFDB (Active fault database) + Barrell et al 2012

The Humps-Leader Fault Fault What we found Scattered small traces in areas where fault was mapped as well as other areas with no active flts Fault displacement is oblique reverse with some oblique normal NE strike = right lateral N-S strike = left lateral; Large displacements also shown in INSAR Active fault trace AFDB +Barrell et al 2012 2016 Surface rupture 2012 NSHM fault source

Photo: Jarg Pettinga Photo: Jarg Pettinga The Humps Fault ENE trend Fault rupture west of Waiau township. Here the oblique dextral fault offset is further complicated by liquefaction and lateral spreading.

Photo: Andy Nicol Segmented fault right lateral offset of ~1m, The Humps Fault Zone, ENE trend

Photo: Kate Pedley Photo: Andy Nicol Leader Fault Left lateral and reverse of ~1.5-2m (approximately equal values of each) Woodchester Station, N-S trend

The Woodchester Wall Leader Fault Left lateral and reverse of ~1.5-2m (approximately equal values of each) Woodchester Station. N-S trend Photo: Kate Pedley Photo: Andy Nicol

The Hundalee fault What did we know The Hundalee was mapped as an active fault onshore but no active traces found close to coast It is a fault source in the NSHM but no field data exists. Derived parameters are: reverse (dextral); 0.4-1.5 (1.2) mm/yr slip rate; 53 km long; Last rupture < 10,000; RI 800-5000; Mw 7.3, SED 3.7 m NSHM: Mapped extending offshore Active fault trace: AFDB and Barrell et al 2012

The Hundalee Fault What we found Scattered small traces in areas where fault was mapped as well as other areas not mapped Some traces mapped as active did not rupture Traces are NE, N-S and E-W Fault displacement is oblique reverse, or just reverse It extended offshore and could be responsible for uplift of Kaikoura Peninsula but no offshore mapping yet Active fault trace AFDB +Barrell et al 2012 2016 Surface rupture 2012 NSHM fault source

Photo: Mark Stirling NE trend thrust, ~ 1m vertical Photo: Mark Stirling E-W trend thrust, cumulative ~ 2m vertical

Photo: David Barrell Photo: David Barrell N20E, reverse ~ 0.5 m N60E, RL strike slip ~1 m, reverse ~ 0.5 m

Hundalee fault Displacement increases towards the coast Photo: Julie Rowland NE trend 3.7 m RL strike-slip (NSHM!!) > 1m dip-slip Photo: Julie Rowland Photo: Julie Rowland

The Papatea Fault What did we know? It was a mapped bedrock fault: boundary between Cretaceous and Miocene rocks. It was a suspected active fault (pre-existing traces? Not in the AFDB, not in the NSHM Papatea fault Active fault trace: AFDB + NIWA

The Papatea Fault What we found Active fault trace AFDB 2016 Surface rupture 2012 NSHM fault source Fault is active Largest vertical offsets (8m) and quite large left lateral (11m) Traces are mainly N-S with some WNW Association with large landslides Linkage with Kekerengu fault is complex Some scarps difficult to detect (monoclines) Papatea fault

Papatea Fault - pop up between two faults at the coast Western coastal trace (left-lateral, reverse) Photo: Julian Thomson

Western coastal trace (left-lateral, reverse) Photo: Robert Langridge Photo: Julian Thomson Photo: Robert Langridge

Papatea Faulteastern coastal trace (left-lateral, reverse) Photo: Julian Thomson

Papatea Faulteastern coastal trace (leftlateral, reverse) 4-m high scarp in beach offset in railway line (down-to-the-east) Photo: Robert Langridge Photo Kate Clark Photo Kate Clark offset in S.H. 1 (down-to-the-east)

Association with huge landslides close to the coast Photo: Robert Langridge/Julie Rowland Seaward Landslide (previously known as cow island or stranded cow landslide) Photo: Robert Langridge/Julie Rowland

Papatea Fault- inland: ~ ^4 m ^6 m ^8+ m ^6 m ^8+ m Photo: Julie Rowland These measurements are approximate (sighted) we are verifying with RTK GPS

scarp ~6 m Posts ~2m high Compressional monocline Photo: Julie Rowland Cumulative throw >6 m, perhaps ~8 m

Papatea Fault- inland: Partial avulsion Clarence River Photo: Robert Langridge large (4 m) scarp formed in Clarence River gravels Photo: Julie Rowland /Robert Langridge

The Kekerengu Fault What did we know? Well studied active fault The second/third fastest fault in NZ: 20-26 mm/yr (Van Dissen et al, partially published) Active fault trace: AFDB and NIWA data offshore (unpublished) 3 last events prior to 2016 (Little et al, unpublished): 249-108 cal. yrs. B.P.; 528-356 cal. yrs. B.P.: 1248-903 cal. yrs. B.P. NSHM fault source is modeled as a combined rupture with Jordan Thrust to SW and Needles Ft or Chancet fault (offshore) Papatea fault

The Kekerengu Fault What we found Very large dextral offsets (max= 11+ m largest) They are still large (8+) close to the Fidget and Jordan faults. ~ 5m strike -slip at the coast Recent trenches: one displaced by 9 m, other not at all (most prominent scarp). Papatea fault Active fault trace AFDB + NIWA 2016 Surface rupture 2012 NSHM fault source

Fly over video

Trench 1 Photo: Tim Little Trench 1, as of Nov 20, 2016 (looking NE) Drone Photo Courtesy Julian Thomson, GNS

Photo: Tim Little

Photo: Tim Little/William Ries

Photo: Rob Zink/Alex Hatem Kekerengu Fault: very large dextral displacements In excess of 10 m! Photo: Mark Hemphill-Haley Photo: Rob Zink/Alex Hatem

Photo: Julian Thomson

Coastal uplift Coastal uplift reflects the uplift associated with fault movement during the 14 Nov event: -major uplift associated with Papatea and Needles? faults - Some offset across faults (or lack of) needs to be explained with offshore (near shore) faulting

(Photo: Pilar Villamor) High tide Seal snoozing in former subtidal zone Stranded crayfish Low tide tide: subtidal kelp exposed (Photo: Pilar Villamor) (Photo: Kate Clark)

DAY 1: red subtidal algae (Photo: Kate Clark) Low tide markers deteriorate fast!! DAY 6: more and more white: uncertainty of marker increasing (Photo: Pilar Villamor) (Photo: Nicola Litchfield) DAY 5: red turning brown and white

Offshore rupture mapping On Tangaroa - seafloor mapping and profiling of the Needles and Chancet faults, two major structures offshore of the Kekerengu Fault Rupture of Kekerengu Ft ss confirmed Rupture of Kekerengu Ft rv possible No Rupture of Boo Boo Ft (northern limit of rupture) Onshore fault breaks in Yellow, provided by onshore team

Post-Nov 14 multibeam mapping and sub-bottom profiling of the Needles and Chancet faults TOPAS PS18 Sub-bottom Profiles Fault rupture Needles Fault rupture preliminary Fault rupture Kekerengu Fault, Little 2015-NHRP Vertical offset up to 1.4 m up to NW

Example of newly mapped trace of the Needles Fault Inferred oblique thrust components of the Needles Fault: Currently uncertain if involved in the Nov 14 Mw 7.8 earthquake

Earthquake Geology Insights ( Not many yet sorry as I am writing this last slide I have received the following email : - Is this earthquake representative of the type of ruptures in this region or the odd event? ( Papatea Ft) - How does this earthquake inform surface displacement distribution? (fault per fault? Rupture as whole?) - How can we account for this complexity in seismic hazard model and PDHA? ( Eg what is secondary?; role of aftershocks) - How much complexity have we missed in historic events that had no INSAR, GNSS, dense seismic instrumentation? - Coseismic coastal uplift how would have we interpreted this event as a prehistoric one?

Tsunami ~ 4 meters Banks Peninsula (Christchurch) ~ 5 meters Oaro (just south of Kaikoura) - Due to rugged coast with mainly gravel offshore and coseismic coastal uplift - No permanent tsunami deposit but stranded fish, crayfish and subtidal algae species.

Landslides Reconnaissance Initial estimates of 80,000-100,000 landslides triggered ~5 >1,000,000 m 3 Identified ~158 landslide dams Area of severe damage: 3,600 km 2 Total area of landsliding: 10,000 km 2

Landslide dams ~158 dams identified Monitoring 11 dams 4 possibly hazardous Daily helicopter reconnaissance River flow gauges Daily reports to Regional Council Modelling of possible dam breaks 80 people evacuated from Goose Bay due to risk of flooding if dam breached Hapuku River Medway River Leader River

Acknowledgments We would like to acknowledge landowners for generously allowing us to undertake this reconnaissance during difficult times Slides different from Earthquake Geology Response come from numerous researchers across GNS Science and partner organisations, including CRIs, QuakeCore, NZ universities and private practice. Their efforts have all contributed to better understanding of this earthquake. These preliminary findings would not be possible without the crucial data provided by GeoNet with the support of its sponsors EQC, and LINZ. SLIDES from Seismology, Geodesy, Lanslide & Engineering Teams: Anna Kaiser, Natalie Balfour, Caroline Holden, Bill Fry, Ian Hamling, Nick Horspool, Graeme McVerry, Elisabetta D Anastasio, Matt Gerstenberger, Stephen Bannister, John Ristau, Chris Van Houtte, Elizabeth Abbott, Sigrun Hreinsdottir, Annemarie Christophersen, David Rhoades, Rafael Benites, Liam Wotherspoon, Sally Dellow, Brenda Rosser, Chris Massey, Fernando della Pascua and many others.