Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis

Similar documents
Analysis of a single pile settlement

Analysis of the horizontal bearing capacity of a single pile

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Verification of a Micropile Foundation

Clayey sand (SC)

Jose Brito, Cenor, Portugal

EN Eurocode 7. Section 3 Geotechnical Data Section 6 Spread Foundations. Trevor L.L. Orr Trinity College Dublin Ireland.

Creation and modification of a geological model Program: Stratigraphy

Talić Z. et al: Geotechnical characteristics... Archives for Technical Sciences 2014, 11(1), 33-39

Creation and modification of a geological model Program: Stratigraphy

Axially Loaded Piles

Leaf Spring (Material, Contact, geometric nonlinearity)

CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual

TC211 Workshop CALIBRATION OF RIGID INCLUSION PARAMETERS BASED ON. Jérôme Racinais. September 15, 2015 PRESSUMETER TEST RESULTS

A Pile Pull Out Test

Permafrost Thawing and Deformations

Seminar Worked examples on Bridge Design with Eurocodes

v Prerequisite Tutorials GSSHA WMS Basics Watershed Delineation using DEMs and 2D Grid Generation Time minutes

COMPARISON OF ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS WITH NUMERICAL MODELING RESULTS OF CONTACT PROBLEM OF THE SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS INTERACTION WITH SUBSOIL

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Rock slope rock wedge stability

Verification Manual. of GEO5 Gravity Wall program. Written by: Ing. Veronika Vaněčková, Ph.D. Verze: 1.0-en Fine Ltd.

Harmonized European standards for construction in Egypt

Multi Linear Elastic and Plastic Link in SAP2000

Use of the Light Falling Weight Deflectometer (LFWD) as a site investigation tool for residual soils and weak rock

USER S MANUAL. 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example. University of California: San Diego.

2D Liquefaction Analysis for Bridge Abutment

Liquefaction and Foundations

13 Dewatered Construction of a Braced Excavation

You w i ll f ol l ow these st eps : Before opening files, the S c e n e panel is active.

Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Geotechnical Modeling Issues

Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering 1.1 Geotechnical Engineering 1.2 The Unique Nature of Soil and Rock Materials

Chapter 1 Introduction

EARTHQUAKE ANALYSIS with SAP2000

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

PILE-SUPPORTED RAFT FOUNDATION SYSTEM

Deep Foundations 2. Load Capacity of a Single Pile

Engineer. Engineering. Engineering. (in-ja-neer ) A person trained and skilled in any of the various branches of engineering: a civil engineer

KDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC METHODS FOR EARTHWORK ASSESSMENT

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

AAG TPoint Mapper (Version 1.40)

The theories to estimate lateral earth pressure due to a strip surcharge loading will

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation

NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF A PILE SUBJECTED TO LATERAL LOADS

Use of CPT for design, monitoring, and performance verification of compaction projects

Earth dam steady state seepage analysis

Dynamics Manual. Version 7

Mechanics of Composite Materials, Second Edition Autar K Kaw University of South Florida, Tampa, USA

Sample Alignment (2D detector) Part

Single Pile Simulation and Analysis Subjected to Lateral Load

Problems of building and designing on semi-rocky soils

Unwedge Geometry and Stability Analysis of Underground Wedges. Sample Problems

St art. rp m. Km /h 1: : : : : : : : : : : : :5 2.5.

STABILITY AND DEFORMATION RESPONSE OF PAD FOUNDATIONONS ON SAND USING STANDARD PENETRATION TEST METHOD

George Mason University Department of Civil, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering


NCHRP LRFD Design Specifications for Shallow Foundations TRB AFS30 Committee Meeting January 26, 2011

BUCKLING OF VARIABLE CROSS-SECTIONS COLUMNS IN THE BRACED AND SWAY PLANE FRAMES

How to create a new geodatabase using the extract data wizard. 1. How to Extract the Schema to create a Geodatabase using an existing design.

CHAPTER 8 ANALYSES OF THE LATERAL LOAD TESTS AT THE ROUTE 351 BRIDGE

Lesson 25. Static Pile Load Testing, O-cell, and Statnamic. Reference Manual Chapter 18

USER S MANUAL 1D Seismic Site Response Analysis Example University of California: San Diego August 30, 2017

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

Pullout Tests of Geogrids Embedded in Non-cohesive Soil

Reliability analysis of slender reinforced concrete column using probabilistic SBRA method

85. Geo Processing Mineral Liberation Data

Appraisal of Soil Nailing Design

Workshop: Build a Basic HEC-HMS Model from Scratch

Task 1: Open ArcMap and activate the Spatial Analyst extension.

SOLIDWORKS Simulation Time Based Thermal Stress

Chapter 7 GEOMECHANICS

Design Example 2.2. Pad foundation with inclined eccentric load on boulder clay

An example of panel solution in the elastic-plastic regime

Hyperbolic Soil Bearing Capacity

Software Verification

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

THE BEHAVIOUR OF FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT BY NONLINEAR FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

Geography 281 Map Making with GIS Project Four: Comparing Classification Methods

Dynamic Response of EPS Blocks /soil Sandwiched Wall/embankment

Safe bearing capacity evaluation of the bridge site along Syafrubesi-Rasuwagadhi road, Central Nepal

85. Geo Processing Mineral Liberation Data

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

Lesson Plan 3 Google Earth Tutorial on Land Use for Middle and High School

How to Perform a Site Based Plant Search

Tutorial 12 Excess Pore Pressure (B-bar method) Undrained loading (B-bar method) Initial pore pressure Excess pore pressure

Sci.Int.(Lahore),28(2), ,2016 ISSN ; CODEN: SINTE

YOUR HW MUST BE STAPLED YOU MUST USE A PENCIL (no pens)

Soil-Structure Interaction in Nonlinear Pushover Analysis of Frame RC Structures: Nonhomogeneous Soil Condition

Sample Alignment Part

Supplementary Problems for Chapter 7

Tower Cranes & Foundations The Interface & CIRIA C654 Stuart Marchand C.Eng. FICE FIStructE Director Wentworth House Partnership


Watershed Modeling Orange County Hydrology Using GIS Data

(THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE REPORT OR APPENDIX OFFERED TO THE USERS OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAM

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

Transcription:

Engineering manual No. 10 Updated: 05/2018 Spread footing settlement and rotation analysis Program: File: Spread footing Demo_manual_10.gpa This engineering manual describes how the analysis of settlement and rotation of a spread footing is performed. Assignment Analyze the settlement of a centric spread footing that was designed in the last chapter (No. 9 Design of dimensions of a spread footing). The geometry of the structure, load, geological profile and soils are all the same as in the last chapter. Perform the settlement analysis using the oedometric modulus and consider the structural strength of the soil. Analyze the foundation in terms of limit states of serviceability. For a structurally indeterminate concrete structure, of which the spread footing is a part, the limiting settlement is: s 60, 0 mm. m, lim = Scheme of the assignment analysis of settlement of a spread footing Solution To solve this task, we will use the GEO5 Spread footing program. We will base our analysis on the task from the last chapter, where almost all the required data are already entered. The design of a spread footing in the last task was performed using the standard EN 1997, DA1. Eurocodes do not dictate which theory for the analysis of settlement must be used, so any common settlement theory will do. In the default setting of the program, the most widely used theory is selected. 1

Firstly, uncheck the option Do not calculate settlement in the Settings frame. Frame Settings Then check the settings by clicking on the Edit button. In the tab Settlement select the method Analysis using oedometric modulus and set the Restriction of influence zone to based on structural strength. Dialog window Edit current settings Note: Structural strength represents the resistance of a soil against the deformation from a load. It is only used in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In other countries, the restriction of the influence zone is described by the percentage of the initial in-situ stress. The recommended values of the structural strength are from CSN 73 1001 standards (Foundation soil below the foundation) 2

In the next step, define the parameters of the soils for a settlement analysis in the frame Soils. We need to edit the existing soil and add values of the Poisson s ratio, the coefficient of structural strength and the oedometric modulus (deformation modulus). Table with the soil parameters Soil, rock (classification) Unit weight 3 kn m Angle of internal friction ef Coeff. of structural Strength m [-] Deformation modulus E def MPa Poisson s ratio S-F Sand with trace of fines, medium dense soil 17,5 29,5 0,3 15,5 0,3 Note: The coefficient of structural strength depends on the type of the soil (more info in F1 HELP). Dialog window Edit soil parameters 3

Analysis Now, we will run the analysis in the frame Settlement. Settlement is always analyzed for the service load. We first need to input some other parameters in the bottom left part of the screen: Initial in-situ stress in the footing bottom is considered from the finished grade In Reduction coefficient to compute settlement, select the option Consider foundation thickness effect ( 1). Frame Settlement analysis settings Note: The value of the in-situ stress in the footing bottom influences the amount of settlement and the depth of the influence zone a larger initial in-situ stress means less settlement. The option of insitu stress acting on the footing bottom depends on how long the footing bottom is open. If the footing bottom is open for a longer period of time, the soil compaction will be smaller and it is not possible to consider the original stress conditions of the soil. Note: The coefficient 1 takes into account the influence of the depth of the foundation and gives more realistic results of the settlement. When using this coefficient, the so-called substitute value of depth under the footing bottom z r is used. 4

Frame Settlement analysis results Results of the analysis The final settlement of the structure is 16,9 mm. Using an analysis of limit states of serviceability, we can compare the values of the analyzed settlement with the limit values, which are permissible for the structure. Note: The stiffness of the structure (soil foundation) has a major influence on the settlement. This stiffness is described by the coefficient k if k is greater than 1, the foundation is considered to be stiff and the settlement is calculated under a characteristic point (located in 0,37l or 0,37b from the center of the foundation, where l and b are the dimensions of the foundation). If the coefficient k is smaller than 1, the settlement is calculated under the center of the foundation. The analyzed stiffness of the foundation in direction is k = 241,94. Therefore, the settlement is computed under a characteristic point of the foundation. Note: Informative values of allowable settlement for different kinds of structures can be found in various standards for example in the CSN EN 1997-1 (2006) Design of geotechnical structures. 5

The Spread footing program also provides results for the rotation of the foundation, which is analyzed using the difference in settlement of the centers of each edge. Rotation of the foundation analysis principle Rotation in direction x : 0,753 (tan 1000) = 0,043 Rotation in direction y : 1,784 (tan 1000) = 0,1 Note: Rotation of the foundation is very important when analyzing the foundation of special structures e. g. bridge abutment, high columns. chimneys, pylons etc. Conclusion This spread footing satisfies the evaluation criteria in terms of settlement. Settlement: s m = 60,0 s 16, 9 [mm]., lim = 6