TFMA Spring Conference Houston, Texas March 10, 2016 PROJECT TEAM:

Similar documents
IH 35 at Blanco River May 2015

Randall W. Parkinson, Ph.D., P.G. Institute of Water and Environment Florida International University

Community Discovery Data Questionnaire

Discovery Data Questionnaire

Storm Surge Analysis Update Meeting Cross City, Florida June 17, 2014

LOCATED IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY PREPARED FOR S.J.R.W.M.D. AND F.W.C.D. DECEMBER, 2003 Updated 2007 Updated May 2014 PREPARED BY

Assumption Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 1, 2015 Napoleonville, LA

City of Madison Flooding Event AUGUST 20 TH, 2018-PRESENT

Location: Jacksonville, FL December 11, 2012

Rebuilding after Hurricane Katrina: Neighborhood Planning with a GIS Template

New Jersey Department of Transportation Extreme Weather Asset Management Pilot Study

Village of Glenview: Community-wide Flood Risk Reduction Program (FRRP)

GIS Monroe Geographic Information System March 14, 2018

New Mapping, Recent Events What do we know? June 9, 2011

Quick Response Report #126 Hurricane Floyd Flood Mapping Integrating Landsat 7 TM Satellite Imagery and DEM Data

West Carroll Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. August 25, 2015 Oak Grove, LA

Ground Water Protection Council 2017 Annual Forum Boston, Massachusetts. Ben Binder (303)

Flood Event Analysis to Estimate the Avoided Damages Due to Flood Improvement Projects & Voluntary Buyout Program

Table G - 6. Mitigation Actions Identified for Implementation by the City of Kent ( ) (From Wilkin County Master Mitigation Action Chart)

Climate Adaptation Challenges for Boston s Water and Sewer Systems

VILLAGE COUNCIL STORMWATER REPORT JULY 23, 2016 STORM EVENT

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

RE: Inadequacy of December 2017 Draft Supplemental Environmental Assessment Review of Recent Storm Events and Flooding

Why Hydrological Services are Important to Business

STATUS OF HAZARD MAPS VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENTS AND DIGITAL MAPS

THE 3D SIMULATION INFORMATION SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING THE FLOODING LOST IN KEELUNG RIVER BASIN

Proposed Scope of Work Village of Farmingdale Downtown Farmingdale BOA Step 2 BOA Nomination Study / Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement

GIS and Remote Sensing Support for Evacuation Analysis

Out with the Old, In with the New: Implementing the Results of the Iowa Rapid Floodplain Modeling Project

Summary of Available Datasets that are Relevant to Flood Risk Characterization

HEC & GIS Modeling of the Brushy Creek HEC & GIS Watershed Modeling of the

Area-wide geotechnical information summary for CERA zoning review panel

Flood Map. National Dataset User Guide

Flood Inundation Mapping

Hurricane Protection and Environmental Restoration

City of Manitou Springs

Information. Information Technology. Geographic. Services (GIS) 119 W Indiana Ave Deland, FL 32720

Page G Crow Wing County Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2017

Volume 1, Chapter 4 Rainfall

Timeframe. Crow Wing County, Baxter, Brainerd, Breezy Point, Crosby, Crosslake, Cuyuna, Deerwood, Emily, Fifty

HAZUS-MH: A Predictable Hurricane Risk Assessment Tool for the City of Houston and Harris County

FLOOD HAZARD AND RISK ASSESSMENT IN MID- EASTERN PART OF DHAKA, BANGLADESH

Floodplain Mapping & Flood Warning Applications in North Carolina

Sea Level Rise and Hurricane Florence storm surge research methodology

IMPERIAL COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT

Background and Purpose of Meeting. River Towers Meeting. Flood Risk Management Study Alternatives Overview

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

A GIS TOUR OF DES MOINES PRESENTED BY ANNA WHIPPLE, GIS MANAGER APRIL 20, 2015

Base Level Engineering FEMA Region 6

Oregon APA Legal Issues Workshop December 7, Tricia Sears, DLCD With information from Bill Burns, DOGAMI

Study 16.5 Probable Maximum Flood (PMF)

Annual TTFO Meeting April 10, 2018 Michael J. Wittman, P.S. Chief Surveyor / GIS Coordinator

Development of a Fluvial Erosion Hazard Mitigation Program for Indiana

Las Colonias Subdivision September 2010 Flood Study

MISSOURI LiDAR Stakeholders Meeting

King City URA 6D Concept Plan

From Vulnerability to Resilience And the Tools to Get There. Out of Harm s Way Partnership for the Delaware Estuary August 1, 2012

An overview of the applications for early warning and mapping of the flood events in New Brunswick

MARINMAP PROJECTS

Final Results and Outreach Lessons Learned

GREENE COUNTY, PA. Revised Preliminary DFIRM Mapping FEMA. Kevin Donnelly, P.E., CFM GG3, Greenhorne & O Mara, Inc. April 10, 2013

Superstorm Sandy What Risk Managers and Underwriters Learned

HURRICANE MATTHEW A GIS PERSPECTIVE GLYNN COUNTY GIS

Dealing with Zone A Flood Zones. Topics of Discussion. What is a Zone A Floodplain?

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG

Appendix C. Questionnaire Summary of Responses Geographic Information Systems

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

West Baton Rouge Parish Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Public Meeting. September 9, 2015 Port Allen, LA

Topographic Wetness Index Urban Flooding Awareness Act Action Support Will and DuPage Counties, Illinois

KENTUCKY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN RISK ASSESSMENT

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

Atlas of the Upper Gila River Watershed

ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA

The Coastal Change Analysis Program and the Land Cover Atlas. Rebecca Love NOAA Office for Coastal Management

COLORING PAGES. Follow Raindy the Raindrop as he travels from your house out to sea.

Dewberry Support to Federal, State, and Local Governments with Hurricane Evacuation Studies

Technical Memorandum #2 Future Conditions

Applying Hazard Maps to Urban Planning

FEMA REGION III COASTAL HAZARD STUDY

DRY LAND APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM 1 U.S.

Initial OPW Designation APSR AFRR IRR Co-ordinates Easting: Northing: River / Catchment / Sub-catchment Type of Flooding / Flood Risk

August 2006 El Paso. Policy Factors

Coastal Flood Risk Study Project for East Coast Central Florida Study Area

3Chapter Three: Rescue and Response

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

Urban Mapping and Providing Partner Services Utilizing GIS Presenter: Josh Garver. GISP, Assistant Director;

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

BRANDON LAKES AVENUE PRE AND POST CONDITIONS DRAINAGE REPORT

Geospatial natural disaster management

Preliminary Vulnerability Assessment of Coastal Flooding Threats - Taylor County, Florida

North Carolina Simplified Inundation Maps For Emergency Action Plans December 2010; revised September 2014; revised April 2015

Innovated Technological Trends in Highways. Flood Modelling & Evaluation of Impacts on Infrastructure

Exhibit A Description of Services Section 37 Floodplain Storage Design

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

Climate Risk Visualization for Adaptation Planning and Emergency Response

why is a national or regional context important?

Risk Identification using Hazus

CHAPTER FIVE: THE LOWER MISSISSIPPI REGION AND PLAQUEMINES PARISH

Design of Levee Breaches in Sheltered Water for Flood Risk Reduction & Marsh Restoration ASFMP; June 5, 2014 Presented By:

Yanbo Huang and Guy Fipps, P.E. 2. August 25, 2006

Transcription:

TFMA Spring Conference Houston, Texas March 10, 2016 PROJECT TEAM: Brown, Leal & Associates R. Gutierrez Engineering ERO Architects Administered by the Texas Water Development Board

History of the Study Funding:» State of Texas Funding following Hurricanes Dolly and Ike» Funded by CDBG appropriations and administered by TWDB» Analysis of Impediments to the Fair Housing» Impediments were identified concerning Colonia Areas What is a Colonia» The term Colonia, in Spanish means a community or neighborhood. A Colonia is a residential area along the Texas-Mexico border that may lack some of the most basic living necessities, such as potable water and sewer systems, electricity, paved roads, and safe and sanitary housing. Project Goal:» To examine the drainage infrastructure needs of the Colonias and identify drainage study and infrastructure gaps that need to be filled in order to address drainage issues.

Planning Area 3 County Focus: Hidalgo, Cameron and Willacy 1,039 OAG and SOS Colonias

Flooding in the LRGV LRGV is floodprone Large Drainage Area with 6 Main Outfalls IBWC South Drain at Highway 281 in Pharr

Flooding in LRGV Subject to tropical storms No drainage to Rio Grande River Very flat terrain with many roads, canal and levee embankments Experiencing rapid development Agriculture based gravity drainage system with several drains Hurricane Buelah September 1967 Hurricane Allen August 1980

About the Study Colonia Assessment» Identify Colonias & Location» Risk» Need Finding the Gap» Evaluate why Colonias Flood Filling the Gap» Evaluate Solutions

Finding the Gap Evaluate why Colonias Flood» Severity of Flooding» Where water moves» Insufficient Drainage» Historical Studies Data Collection» Local Stakeholders» Advocacy Groups» Colonia Residents» Existing Studies» Identified Mitigation Projects

Filling the Gap Evaluate Solutions» Greatest Risk» Alternatives Analysis» Identify Projects» Implement Solutions (Future) Potential Improvements» Drainage channels» Storm drain systems» Detention ponds» Retention ponds» Pumping systems

Phase 1 Summary Outreach» Public Meetings» Colonia Representatives Data Collection» List & Location of Colonias» Catalog existing Studies & Projects Examine existing stormwater drainage studies. Identify projects that reduce flood risk for colonias within the three counties. Colonia Assessment» Ultimately identify the Colonias with the greatest need (risk of flooding) for drainage study and infrastructure necessary to address drainage issues.

Phase 1 : Outreach Public Meetings» Advertisement» Presentation» Comment Forms Advocate Group Support» Engagement» Targeted Efforts» Additional Comment Forms» Historical Information

Phase 1 : Studies & Projects Catalog Compiled Database» Location» Study/Report Details Name Date Associated Modeling Funding Source» Project Details Name Date Associated Study Associated Modeling and/or Design Project Status Funding Source Study/Report Catalog Report/Study Title Report/Study Date Report Available Model Available Model Platform Model Run Geospatial model Spatial Data Available Projects Identified Projects Designed Projects Funded Funding Source Projects Implemented Identified Project Catalog Projects Identifier Project Planned Project Cost Funding Secured Funding Source Project Implemented Project Impact Report/Study Title Report/Study Date Report Available Model Available Model Platform Model Run Geospatial model Spatial Data Available Design Sheets Available Design Format Design Status Survey Available Survey Data Format Notes: List report or study title. List report or study completion date. Is the report available? Is the model available? What modeling platform was used? (HMS, RAS, XP-SWMM, ICPR, etc.) Does the model run? Is the model geospatial? Is the geospatial data available? Did the report/study identify projects for flood mitigation? Were the identified projects analyzed/designed? Ready for construction? Is funding secured for projects? List the funding source. (FEMA, USACE, Bond, etc.) Has the project been constructed? Notes: List project name or identifier. Was the identified project analyzed/designed? Ready for construction? How much does the designed project cost? Is funding secured for project? List the funding source. (FEMA, USACE, Bond, etc.) Has the project been constructed? Briefly explain the impact or results of project. List report or study title. List report or study completion date. Is the report available? Is the model available? What modeling platform was used? (HMS, RAS, XP-SWMM, ICPR, etc.) Does the model run? Is the model geospatial? Is the geospatial data available? Are the project design plans available? What is the format of the design plans? (PDF, CADD, GIS, etc.) What is the status of the design? Is survey data available? What is the format of the survey data? (PDF, ASCII, text, CADD, etc.)

Phase 1 : Studies & Projects Catalog Location of Studies / Reports» 65 Identified Studies (including county-wide studies)

Phase 1 : Studies & Projects Catalog Location of Identified Mitigation Projects» 500 Identified Projects (including county-wide solutions)

Phase 1: Colonia Database Obtained from OAG Includes All Colonias (not just SOS)» Spatial Location of Colonia (size/location)» Population from TWDB Database» Defines if has Existing Drainage Infrastructure» Defines Establishment Date» Historic Flooding

Location Verification Collin Subdivision Hidalgo County» Shift = 1,000 feet» Population = 59 S&C Willacy County» Shift = 700 feet» Population = 17

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment People (40%) Community (10%) Risk (40%) Infrastructure (10%)

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment People» Low to Moderate Income Indexing HUD 2010 LOWMOD Income Data for Texas» Population OAG Database/2010 Census

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment People - LMI

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment People Population

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Community» City Boundaries OAG Database» Drainage Districts Political Boundaries

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Community City Boundaries

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Community Drainage Districts

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Risk» Historic Flooding TWDB High Water Marks Public High Water Marks (Comment Forms) Insurance Claims OAG Database» Floodplains FEMA Cameron County DD6 Studies USACE Delineations Willacy Estimations» Low Terrain LiDAR Surface Filled Sinks to find ponded water locations» Soil Survey Hydric Soils Types C& D

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Risk Historic Flooding

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Risk Floodplains

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Risk Low Terrain

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Risk Hydric Soils

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Infrastructure» Model Subdivision OAG Database» Existing Drainage Infrastructure OAG Database» Identified Project Project Catalog

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Infrastructure Existing Drainage Infrastructure

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Results People Information for all Colonias» 79% of Colonias are considered LMI Communities» 16% of Colonias have a population greater than 250 Risk Information for all Colonias» 50% not in a designated floodplain» 70% are not in low lying terrain» 78% have non-hydric soils

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Validation Outreach and Site Visits» 4 Public Workshops with Colonia Stakeholder Assistance» 404 Site Visits to observe site conditions and validate desktop data» Survey Residents Colonia Categorization» A1 Localized Solutions with Structure Flooding» A2 Localized Solutions with Nuisance (Roadway, Lot, Maintenance Flooding)» B1 Regional Solutions with Structure Flooding» B2 Regional Solutions with Nuisance (Roadway, Lot, Maintenance Flooding)» C Colonias that may not have Possible Solution» D Colonias that may not be Impacted

Phase 1: Colonia Assessment Categorization Results

Phase 2: Localized Analysis Localized analysis of Individual Colonias» Consistent, Accurate, and Defendable Models» Drainage Standards (Establish Design Frequencies)» Level of Risk (Establish Depths of Flooding)» Localized Drainage Solutions» No Adverse Impact (Improvements do not negatively impact neighbors)

Phase 2: Localized Analysis

Questions www.lrgvdrainage.org