Cascadia Seismic Event Planning for the Maritime Community

Similar documents
RECENT COMPREHENSIVE TSUNAMI MODELING FOR COASTAL OREGON

New Oregon Tsunami Simulation Scenarios, Published Data, and Probable Effect on the Oregon Building Code

What is a tsunami? Capital Regional District Tsunami Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) Tsunami (soo-nah-mee)

Tsunami potential and modeling

Tsunami Hazard Map of the Warrenton Area, Clatsop County, Oregon

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY & MINERAL INDUSTRIES

DRAFT - Tsunami Response Plan Playbook Santa Cruz Harbor Maritime Community

Surviving the Big One: Understanding and Preparing for a Major Earthquake in Western Oregon

Earthquakes and Tsunamis

(energy loss is greater with longer wavelengths)

The Impacts of the Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquake on Oregon. Dr. Althea Rizzo Oregon Military Department Office Of Emergency Management

The 1700/01/26 Cascadia subduction zone Earthquake and Tsunami

Landslide & Coastal Erosion Risk Reduction at Oregon s Water/Wastewater Networks

Three Fs of earthquakes: forces, faults, and friction. Slow accumulation and rapid release of elastic energy.

Lessons Learned from Past Tsunamis Warning and Emergency Response

Tsunami waves swept away houses and cars in northern Japan and pushed ships aground.

Predicting tsunami waves and currents on the West Coast of Canada: A case study for Ucluelet, BC

What causes tsunamis?

Magnitude 7.5 NEW BRITAIN REGION, PAPUA NEW GUINEA

Disclaimer. This report was compiled by an ADRC visiting researcher (VR) from ADRC member countries.

The Field Research Facility, Duck, NC Warming Ocean Observations and Forecast of Effects

TSUNAMI INUNDATION MODELING: SENSITIVITY OF VELOCITY AND MOMENTUM FLUX TO BOTTOM FRICTION WITH APPLICATION TO BUILDING DAMAGE AT SEASIDE, OREGON

Scientific Research on the Cascadia Subduction Zone that Will Help Improve Seismic Hazard Maps, Building Codes, and Other Risk-Mitigation Measures

Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e Case History: Indonesian Tsunami Indonesian Tsunami (2) Introduction Historic Tsunamis

FROM: GEORGE PRIEST, Tsunami Specialist, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries

Magnitude 7.7 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION

Portland Water Bureau. Preparing Portland s Water Supply for The Big One. July 11, Tim Collins, P.E., G.E.

REPORT TO THE PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMITTEE MEETING OF JUNE 26, 2013

Magnitude 6.5 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA

Introduction to Environmental Geology, 5e

Marine Studies Initiative Building Site Selection TAB U

The Cascading Hazards from Cascadia s Earthquakes

TSUNAMI HAZARD MITIGATION ACTIVITIES IN CALIFORNIA

What Are Disasters? The Rescue Kids Trio!

Wainui Beach Management Strategy (WBMS) Summary of Existing Documents. GNS Tsunami Reports

Magnitude 7.9 SE of KODIAK, ALASKA

The Three Things You Need to Know About Tsunami Preparedness Patrick Corcoran, Oregon Sea Grant,

Cascadia Preparedness. Tsunami Road Show 2012

Magnitude 7.1 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN

Pacific Ocean Tsunami Generated by Japan Earthquake

Indian Ocean Tsunami Warning System: Example from the 12 th September 2007 Tsunami

Earthquakes in Oregon: Past, Present & Future. Earthquakes in OREGON: Are we ready for the Big One?

TSUNAMI and SEICHE DEFINITIONS:

Tsunami Hazard Assessment of the Ocosta School Site in Westport, WA

Unit 9 (packet #2): Volcanoes and Earthquakes

Linkage to the National Program

Magnitude 7.0 N of ANCHORAGE, ALASKA

"The Big One" by sea and not by land

Natural Hazards Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards ISSN X

Mondo Quake in Pacific Northwest? By Leander Kahney

Coseismic slip model

Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis. Hong Kie Thio AECOM, Los Angeles

How to communicate Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake hazards

Seismic Activity and Crustal Deformation after the 2011 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake

Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Maps and GIS

Surviving Tsunamis on the Oregon Coast

TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT FOR THE CENTRAL COAST OF PERU USING NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS FOR THE 1974, 1966 AND 1746 EARTHQUAKES

We have previously looked at artificial seismograms such as this one here.

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

Prevention Tsunami wall 10m high (breached by the tsunami due to land level falling by 3m)

4-3-1 Earthquake and Tsunami Countermeasures of Tokyo s

Lessons from the 2004 Sumatra earthquake and the Asian tsunami

AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF

NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF TSUNAMI PROPAGATION AND INUNDATION ALONG THE RAKHINE COAST AREAS IN MYANMAR

Tsunami. Harry Yeh Oregon State University. Eastern Japan Earthquake Disaster Briefing at PEER: April 28, 2011

- Information before strong ground motion -

Important Concepts. Earthquake hazards can be categorized as:

Report on the Damage Survey Caused by Hurricane Katrina (Tentative Report)

4. Regions Northland Region Distant Eastern source: South America (Chile/Peru)

Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis (why do we live here?) Tectonic plates. Tectonic plates: Juan de Fuca. Volcanism the past 37 million years

Preparation for Future Earthquake and Tsunami Hazards: Lessons Learned from the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake and the Asian Tsunami

Marine Geomorphology as a Determinant for Essential Life Habitat III

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

REPORT ON THE TOHOKU AREA PASIFIC OFFSHORE EARTHQUAKE

Mechanism of tsunami generation,propagation and runup -sharing experiences with Japanese

Baldwin County, Alabama

UNDERSTANDING TSUNAMI RISK TO STRUCTURES: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE

Meeting July 2018 Agenda Item 7.1. Tsunami Service Provider Messages for the Maritime Community. Submitted by IOC Secretariat SUMMARY

IG-WRDRR, UNESCAP, UNESCO-IOC, WMO. Yukio Tamura Chairman, International. Group. Tuesday 10 May, , Room 13. for Disaster. Risk.

What scientists know and do not know about the big one at Cascadia

March 11, 2011 Japanese Tsunami

Three Dimensional Simulations of Tsunami Generation and Propagation

Chapter 4 Earthquakes and Tsunamis

Chapter 4 Earthquakes and Tsunamis. Geology of the Hawaiian Islands. Any Questions? Class March Mean = 78.

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS FOR TSUNAMI FORECASTING AT PADANG CITY USING OFFSHORE TSUNAMI SENSORS

UNDERSTANDING TSUNAMI RISK TO STRUCTURES: A CANADIAN PERSPECTIVE

Preliminary Data Release for the Humboldt Bay Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment: Humboldt Bay Sea Level Rise Inundation Mapping

The Bottom of the Ocean

Earthquakes in Canada

THE 2011 TOHOKU EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN. VSU Lyuben Karavelov, Sofia, Bulgaria. Key words: Tohoku earthquake, strong ground motion, damage

Tsunami Response and the Enhance PTWC Alerts

QUANTIFYING NUMERICAL MODEL ACCURACY AND VARIABILITY. Luis Montoya 1 and Patrick Lynett 1

LOCAL TSUNAMIS: CHALLENGES FOR PREPAREDNESS AND EARLY WARNING

Earthquake Hazards. Tsunami

TSUNAMI CHARACTERISTICS OF OUTER-RISE EARTHQUAKES ALONG THE PACIFIC COAST OF NICARAGUA - A CASE STUDY FOR THE 2016 NICARAGUA EVENT-

REAL-TIME TSUNAMI INUNDATION FORECAST STUDY IN CHIMBOTE CITY, PERU

KNOWLEDGE NOTE 5-1. Risk Assessment and Hazard Mapping. CLUSTER 5: Hazard and Risk Information and Decision Making. Public Disclosure Authorized

Finding an Earthquake Epicenter Pearson Education, Inc.

Tsunami Inundation Modelling for Bay of Plenty - Executive Summary March 2013

Interpretive Map Series 24

Transcription:

Cascadia Seismic Event Planning for the Maritime Community Jonathan Allan, Oregon Dept. of Geology and Mineral Industries Presentation to Annual Pacific Northwest Waterways Association Meeting (PNWA) October 7th, 2015 Embassy Suites, Portland

Presentation Outline Introduce concept of local vs distant tsunami sources; Discuss recent Oregon mapping efforts, results and end products; What are we doing to address maritime safety in response to tsunami; Upcoming focused modeling and mapping efforts in the Columbia R.; and, Conclusion.

Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) North American Plate Overrides Juan de Fuca Plate Along Cascadia Subduction Zone at a rate of 1.5 inches/year

Using paleoseismology as the foundation for tsunami modeling 10,000 year record of deep sea turbidites Coastal evidence of coseismic subsidence and tsunami inundation Tsunami deposits in Oregon estuaries and coastal lakes

A 10,000 year history of ~40 great Cascadia earthquakes in Oregon The last big Cascadia earthquake and local tsunami in the Northwest was January 26, 1700 at ~9:00 PM. (Satake et al., 2003, Journ. Geophys. Res., v 108, no. B11, p. 2535.)

Subduction Zone Fault Slip Displaces the Pacific

Tsunami genesis Courtesy Professor Miho Aoki, University of Alaska-Fairbanks Art Department, University of Alaska-Fairbanks

Tsunamis are NOT like wind waves Wind waves break on shore in a few seconds Tsunamis are a higher ocean surface that just keeps coming for tens of minutes

WHERE DO OREGON TSUNAMIS COME FROM? Subduction Zones (blue lines). Local Oregon Tsunamis Distant Tsunamis LSAC Meeting, Newport 2015

Distant vs Local Tsunami Distant: Arrives 4 + hours after the earthquake Lower damage and flooding than local tsunamis National Tsunami Warning System can warn you Local Tsunami: Arrives minutes after the earthquake Much higher waves Much further inland penetration NOAA Tsunami Warning System ineffective Earthquake = Only Warning

Tohoku, Japan, March 11, 2011 The tsunami, seen crashing into homes in Natori, Miyagi prefecture. AP AP Disaster Management Building

Oregon Tsunami Inundation Hazard Team Acknowledgments: Rob Witter Joseph Zhang Kelin Wang Chris Goldfinger George Priest Laura Stimely

Qualitative Explanation of Cascadia Tsunami Scenarios shown on published tsunami inundation maps (TIMs) = 100% of local tsunamis (~5000-yr event) Local Tsunami Evacuation Zone for Oregon = 98% of local tsunamis (~5000-yr event) = 95% of local tsunamis (~2500-yr event) SB 379 (approximately) = 79% of local tsunamis (~500-yr event)

Summary: Cascadia Tsunami Scenarios Paleoseismology constrains results Cascadia earthquakes: M w 8.7 to M w 9.2 Coseismic slip range: 9 to 44 m Tsunami runup: 4 to >25 m Max shoreline wave amplitude: 4 to >25 m Inundation distance: 1 to >3 km Tsunami arrival: 15 to 20 minutes Tsunami Inundation Map (TIM)

STATEWIDE DISTANT TSUNAMI SCENARIOS AK64: Largest historical tsunami (1964 Mw 9.2 earthquake in Gulf of Alaska) AKmax: Maximum-considered tsunami (Hypothetical Mw 9.2 earthquake in Gulf of Alaska)

AKmax = Distant Tsunami Evacuation Zone for Oregon Has maximum directivity to the Oregon coast. (Source 3 illustration from Tsunami Pilot Study Working Group (2006))

27 fathoms (164 ft) Shoreline Tsunami Height is Strongly Affected by Bathymetry Designing for Tsunamis 5-18-15

Open coast XXL1 mean = 62 ft

http://nvs.nanoos.org/tsunamievac http://www.oregongeology.org/tsuclearinghouse

Maritime Tsunami Dangers High velocity currents that tear up port facilities and tethered vessels Wind wave amplification by tsunami currents Rapidly reversing velocity Minimum flow depth (grounding of vessels) Debris field from withdrawing tsunamis & currents Tsunami wave steepness (only very close to shore) Vorticity (whirlpools)

Crescent City Near Brookings, Oregonian

Thresholds Vorticity, Minimum Flow Depth, Velocity, Wind Wave Amplification Velocity threshold >3 knots Large amplification of PNW wind waves in open ocean Damaging to port facilities in estuaries Minimum flow depth for grounding vessels <50 ft for statewide guidance Could be much less for estuaries with only smaller vessels Threshold vorticity >0.1 for very strong shear Could be as low as >0.01 for any shear

PORT DAMAGE vs TSUNAMI CURRENT VELOCITY (NTHMP Mapping and Modeling Subcommittee (2014) modified from Lynett and others (2014) 3-KNOT THRESHOLD

STATEWIDE MARITIME GUIDANCE Distant Tsunamis Warning: NOAA broadcasts 4 hours to take action Offshore: go to >30 fathoms; Guidance during event: USCG Tied to dock: Check with local officials Explore options in advance (e.g. go upriver? Out to sea?) On Land: Go to evacuation site Wait until local officials say it is safe to return. Local Tsunamis Warning: Ground shaking Ocean roar Water receding or surging 10 minutes to take action Offshore: go to >100 fathoms; Guidance during event: USCG Tied to dock or on land: Go to evacuation site Wait until local officials say it is safe to return. Plan to be out to sea for days with nearby ports out of commission (fuel, food, etc.).

Newport-Toledo Maritime Guidance for Distant Tsunamis Guidance is for distant tsunamis, because there are more options for these smaller tsunamis than for local tsunamis which arrive in tens of minutes after the earthquake and always destroy or heavily damage port assets. Process: Organize Local Tsunami Advisory Committee (LSAC) Present key tsunami hazard data Formulate straw man guidance options LSAC reviews and then meets to decide

Major Damage to Complete Destruction Moderate to Major Damage Minor to Moderate Damage Time history data is from Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Open-File Report O-13-16, observation Station 81, Grid B.

Threshold Assumed tide = MHHW (mean higher high water) 7.6 ft NAVD88 LSAC Meeting, Newport 2015

LSAC Meeting, Newport 2015

Summary Cascadia will be devastating for the PNW; Coastal communities will be isolated and likely will have to survive for a number of weeks on few supplies; Ports and harbors will be destroyed, and many estuaries (including critical navigational channels) will likely be filled with debris and impassable; Jetties will likely be destroyed and controlled entrances will be free to migrate again; For a distant tsunami, and time permitting, mariners may choose to evacuate to deep water (30 fathom line); For a local tsunami, there is no time to evacuate from ports; and, Vessels already out on the ocean should evacuate to either the 30 fathom line (distant event) or 100 fathom line for a local tsunami.