NGS is Scheduled to Replace NAVD 88 and NAD 83 In 2022

Similar documents
The National Spatial Reference System of the Future

MSGIC Spring Mtg Denton April 23, 2014

U.S. Datums: Where We ve Been,

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

NGS and the Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)

NATRF 2022 AND LDP OCTOBER 11, 2017

Vertical Reference Frame Pacific

Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System 2022 Datum. Jacksonville Chapter July 2018

MODERNIZATION OF THE NSRS

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

GISC3325 Spring 2011 Final Exam

Changes are coming NGS NSRS Modernization Are you Ready?

The U.S. National Spatial Reference System in 2022

New Datums: Replacing NAVD 88 and NAD 83

Achieving Great Height with GNSS

Update on GRAV-D and Progress toward a new vertical Datum

Height Modernization 2013 A New Canadian Vertical Datum

Beyond GEOID12: Implementing a New Vertical Datum for North America

Proceedings of the First International Conference on Civil Engineering, Assiut University, Volume 2, pp , October 7-8.

Height Modernization Program in the United States: Implementing a Vertical Datum Referenced to a Gravimetric Geoid Model

Geographic Information Systems class # 1 February 19, Coordinate reference systems in GIS: geodetic coordinates

GRAV-D. Gravity for the Re-definition of the American Vertical Datum

Ellipsoid Hydro Datum Geoid Errors

Control Surveys and Coordinate Systems

HORIZONTAL PROJECTION PARAMETERS: DANE COUNTY COORDINATES

Precise Hong Kong Geoid HKGEOID-2000

The U.S. National Spatial Reference System in 2022

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

New Datums: Replacing NAVD 88 and NAD 83

PGM2016: A new geoid model for the. Philippines

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Towards a New Geoid Model of Tanzania Using Precise Gravity Data. 1. Introduction. Selassie David Mayunga

Fusion of Geodesy and GIS at NOAA s National Geodetic Survey

Inclusion of Leveling with GNSS Observations in a Single, 3-D Geodetic Survey Network Adjustment. Daniel GILLINS, U.S.A., and Michael DENNIS, U.S.A.

GEOIDS FAQ. November

Modernization of National Geodetic Datum in China *

Positioning the Pacific: NOAA s Geospatial Activities. Juliana Blackwell, Director NOAA s National Geodetic Survey March 6, 2012

The Future of SPCS in Charles Chuck Ghilani, Ph.D. Professor Emeritus Pennsylvania State University

Consideration of a Global Vertical Reference System (GVRS) in the IERS Conventions

Session description and objectives

GPS and Mean Sea Level in ESRI ArcPad

Height systems. Rudi Gens Alaska Satellite Facility

Geodesy, Geoids, and Vertical Datums: A Perspective from the U.S. National Geodetic Survey

A new geoid model for Bhutan. Machiel Bos Rui Fernandes

Global vertical datum unification based on the combination of the fixed gravimetric and the scalar free geodetic boundary value problems

GEOID UNDULATIONS OF SUDAN USING ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS COMPARED WITH THE EGM96 ANG EGM2008

Positioning a nation for the future: Modernizing the United States National Spatial Reference System

System of Geodetic Parameters Parametry Zemli 1990 PZ-90.11

Why do we need a proper geoid

The Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) of the International Association of Geodesy (IAG)

GGOS Bureau for Standards and Conventions

GPS Surveying Dr. Jayanta Kumar Ghosh Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee. Lecture 06 GPS Position

Semi-Dynamic Datum of Indonesia

Specification of the Baltic Sea Chart Datum 2000 (BSCD2000)

National Geodetic Survey

What s Up? Tidal and Vertical Datums. Noel Zinn Hydrometronics LLC July 2011, revised November 2013

GEOID12A for LGO. September, Leica Geosystems Incorporated

VT State Plane. Daniel J. Martin National Geodetic Survey VT Geodetic Advisor. VSLS Conference Rutland VT April 11, 2008

Session 2.2: Gravity and WHS

Dependences in the pillar Earth s gravity field of

GPS Derived Heights: A Height Modernization Primer

Town of Chino Valley. Survey Control Network Report. mgfneerhg mc N. Willow Creek Road Prescott AZ

Geoiddetermination -a brief review. Zainal Abidin Md Som Department of Geoinformation FGHT

Boolean Operators and Topological OVERLAY FUNCTIONS IN GIS

3 Geodesy, Datums, Map Projections,

Faatasi Malologa (PGSC Chair) Director Department of Lands & Survey, Tuvalu

A Unique Reference Frame: Basis of the Global Geodetic Observing System (GGOS) for Geodynamics and Global Change

Positioning in the Pacific Islands

The 3-D Global Spatial Data Model: Geometrical Foundation of the Global Spatial Data Infrastructure

4 Survey Datums. 4.1 Horizontal Datum Policy SURVEY DATUMS SEPTEMBER 2006

Coordinate Systems and Datum Transformation in ArcGIS. Brittney White and Melita Kennedy

Meeting the ODOT Survey & Mapping Specifications

This Land Surveying course has been developed by Failure & Damage Analysis, Inc.

HEIGHT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION AND GEOID MODELLING STUDIES IN TURKEY

Brussels, BELGIUM. Bojan Stopar. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering

Shape of the Earth. Data Output by the Receiver

Update on GRAV-D and Progress toward a new vertical Datum

How does an ellipsoid differ from a sphere in approximating the shape and size of the Earth?

This week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6

The Future of SPCS in 2022

The Earth Explorer Missions - Current Status

Mobile Mapping Tips and Tricks

Global Navigation Satellite Systems

Definition and Realization of the EVRS: How do we want to proceed?

Towards The Modernization Of Indian Vertical Datum

TOWARDS ROBUST LOCALIZATION OF RTK-GPS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS 23

ch02.pdf chap2.pdf chap02.pdf

Evaluation of the Earth Gravity Model EGM2008 in Algeria

ESTIMATION OF ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHT USING EGM2008 AND GPS OVER NAIROBI COUNTY AND ITS ENVIRONS

Presented at the FIG Working Week 2017, May 29 - June 2, 2017 in Helsinki, Finland. ODUMOSU, Joseph O. ABIODUN, O. A KEVIN, K. M. ADAMU, G.

Final VRF grids Date: Aug 25, 2011 Author: R. Forsberg, G. Strykowski, O. Andersen

THE SITUATION IN EASTERN EUROPE ABOUT GEOID / QUASIGEOID MODELS DETERMINATION

Height systems. Rüdiger Gens

HIMALAYAN AIRBORNE GRAVITY AND GEOID OF NEPAL

Reference Systems. Paolo Zatelli - Alfonso Vitti. Dept. Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Trento

Version 1.1 GIS Syllabus

What is a Map Projection?

What is Geodesy? Types of Geodesy terrestrial or classical geodesy space geodesy theoretical geodesy

GEODETIC NETWORK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND FIDUCIAL STATIONS. GFN OF Saudi Arabia in Based on ITRF2000 Datum

Geodetic applications of GNSS in the Black Sea region

Geodesy. orientation. shape. gravity field

Transcription:

NGS is Scheduled to Replace NAVD 88 and NAD 83 In 2022 Indiana Society of Professional Land Surveyors Conference January 2017 John Ellingson NGS Geodetic Advisor john.ellingson@noaa.gov 202-306-6904 1

New GEOPOTENTIAL (vertical) datum to replace NAVD 88 Which precipitated a change to.. New GEOMETRIC (horizontal/3-d) datum to replace NAD 83 Let s start with the GEOPOTENTIAL (vertical) datum.. 2

Why isn t NAVD 88 good enough anymore? (1 of 3) NAVD 88 suffers from bench marks that: Are often 80+ years old Are almost never re-checked for movement Disappear by the thousands every year Are seldom being replaced May not exist near locations where they are needed Were all determined by leveling from a single point, allowing unwanted cross-country error build up

Why isn t NAVD 88 good enough anymore? (2 of 3) NAVD 88 suffers from a zero height surface that: Has been proven to be ~50 cm biased from the latest, best geoid models ( GRACE satellite program) Has been proven to be ~ 1 meter tilted across CONUS (again, based on the independently computed geoid from the GRACE satellite)

Initial point of NAVD 88. FATHER POINT

Why replace NAVD 88? BIAS of Approximately ½ meter KNOWN TILT..(about a meter) from SE to NW 6

GRACE (NASA and Germany) Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (launched 2002, expected out-of-service in 2016 still going) GOCE (European Space Agency) Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Explorer (launched 2009, ended November 2013) 7

Why isn t NAVD 88 good enough anymore? (3 of 3) Newer methods to determine/establish heights are available (GNSS), but in many places NAVD 88 doesn t support them very well There are areas where NAVD 88 marks are scarce.or do not exist

Geoid Geopotential surfaces Ellipsoid surface Gravity vector (aka plumbline ), pointing up The relationships between the ellipsoid surface (solid red), various geopotential surfaces (dashed blue), and the geoid (solid blue). The geoid exists approximately at mean sea level (MSL). Not shown is the actual surface of the earth, which coincides with MSL but is generally above the geoid. 9

ELLIPSOID - GEOID RELATIONSHIP H = Orthometric Height (NAVD 88) h = Ellipsoidal Height (NAD 83 (2011)) N = Geoid Height (GEOID12B) H h N Ground Surface Geoid Geoid Ellipsoid GRS80 H ~ h N N is negative in conterminous US 10

11

Gravity for the Redefinition of the American Vertical Datum Overall Target: 2 cm accuracy orthometric heights from GNSS and a geoid model GRAV-D Goal: Create gravimetric geoid accurate to 1 cm where possible using airborne gravity data GRAV-D: Two thrusts of the project Airborne gravity survey of entire country and its holdings Long-term monitoring of geoid change Leveraging partnerships to improve and validate gravity data

GRAV-D Website http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/grav-d

Entire U.S. and territories Total Square Kilometers: 15.6 million (~6 million Sections) ~200 km buffer around territory or shelf break if possible Initial target area for 2022 deadline Data Collection Scope

Survey and Block Plans Data lines spaced 10 km apart Cross lines spaced 60-80 km apart Flight altitude 20,000 ft. Nominal speed 220-250 knots

GRAV-D Status 11-30-16: 58%

Properly Scaled Coverage Map 20

NGS produces: GRAVIMETRIC GEOID: Converts heights from ITRFxx to the NGS geoid surface ( is not NAVD 88 or other Vertical datums). Used by scientists. USGG**** ( Last one was completed in 2012 ) HYBRID GEOID: Converts heights from NAD 83 to regional Vertical datums (e.g., NAVD 88). Used by surveyors - engineers - others. GEOID12B (same model values as GEOID12A in this region) GEOID12A GEOID09 GEOID03 GEOID99 GEOID96 xgeoid16: Experimental models related to the upcoming 2022 datum changes. NOT for current NAVD 88 values. Primarily used by scientists. 21

The new GEOPOTENTIAL datum should produce accuracies within 1 to 2 centimeters. Photo courtesy of RW Engineering & Surveying Projects that were formerly leveled will most often obtain vertical control based on GNSS. 22

Let s move on to the GEOMETRIC (3D) datum 23

Why replace NAD 83? NAD 83 was aligned to Geodetic Reference System 1980 (GRS80), and so was the original World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84) meaning NAD 83 IS equivalent to the original WGS 84.but NOT to the newer versions. Newer versions of WGS 84 have been developed to be consistent with updated International Terrestrial Reference Frames (ITRFXX) G730 (June 1994) G873 (January 1997) G1150 (January 2002) G1674 (February 2012) 0.7 m 0.2 m 0.06 m 0.01 m 24

Sketch showing the difference between ITRF 2008 and NAD 83 ITRF 08 25

27

How will these new datums impact my work? Users in this region will see a GEOMETRIC (3-D) shift of about 2 meters Users in this region will see a GEOPOTENTIAL (Vert.) shift of about 0.8 m. * Some users will delay in switching to the new datums The NGS 10 year plan states that a transformation tool will be provided at the release of the new datums that will enable users to transform values between the older datums (NAD 83 and NAVD 88) and the new GEOMETRIC and GEOPOTENTIAL datums. 28

Summary and Questions John.Ellingson@noaa.gov Phone 202-306-6904 http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/datums/newdatums/faqnewdatums.shtml http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/grav-d/ http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/corbin/class_description/ngs_video_library.shtml 29