ROCK EXCAVATION (GRADING) OPSS 206 INDEX

Similar documents
B805 TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES - OPSS 805

Materials. Use materials meeting the following.

February 22, 2016 AG File No

Rock & Aggregate Drop Inlet Protection

DESIGN BULLETIN No. 39/2006 (Revised June 2007) June 2007 Amendment to Design Bulletin #39/2006

FOR PROJECTS INITIATED AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 2008 ITEM 716 EMBANKMENT EARTH OUTLET SEDIMENT TRAP

FROST HEAVE. GROUND FREEZING and FROST HEAVE

KDOT Geotechnical Manual Edition. Table of Contents

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING. PLAN SUBGRADES Geotechnical Bulletin GB1

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

Central Queensland Coal Project Appendix 4b Geotechnical Assessment. Environmental Impact Statement


HISTORY OF CONSTRUCTION FOR EXISTING CCR SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT PLANT GASTON ASH POND 40 CFR (c)(1)(i) (xii)

DOCUMENTATION WORKBOOK FY 2018

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

PAVEMENT REPORT. Submitted to: Lee Jablonski, P.Eng. J.L. Richards & Associates Limited 864 Lady Ellen Place Ottawa, ON K1Z 5M2

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

RIPRAP ASSESSMENT VARIOUS SITES HWY 40 NEAR GRANDE CACHE, AB

Updated Subsurface Investigation Block A Heritage Hills Development 124 Battersea Crescent Ottawa, Ontario

PRELIMINARY CULVERT ANALYSIS REPORT FOR CULVERT NO. 008-C OREGON AVENUE OVER PINEHURST CREEK

HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS MUSKEG RIVER BRIDGE

Engineer. Engineering. Engineering. (in-ja-neer ) A person trained and skilled in any of the various branches of engineering: a civil engineer

June 9, R. D. Cook, P.Eng. Soils Engineer Special Services Western Region PUBLIC WORKS CANADA WESTERN REGION REPORT ON

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

Stormwater Inlet Sediment Traps

1. PROJECT BACKGROUND. July 18, Alberta Infrastructure & Transportation Central Region #401, Street Red Deer, Alberta T4N 6K8

Slope Stability Evaluation Ground Anchor Construction Area White Point Landslide San Pedro District Los Angeles, California.

SOIL AND AGGREGATE FUNDAMENTALS STUDENT GUIDE AMRC April, 2006 AREA MANAGER ROADS CERTIFICATION PROGRAM FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

[1] Performance of the sediment trap depends on the type of outlet structure and the settling pond surface area.

Geology 229 Engineering Geology. Lecture 7. Rocks and Concrete as Engineering Material (West, Ch. 6)

September 3, 2009 File: NORTH CENTRAL REGION GEOHAZARD ASSESSMENT HWY 40:28 NORTH OF CADOMIN (NC50) 2009 ANNUAL INSPECTION REPORT

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT CBSA Facility Redevelopment Thousand Islands International Crossing Lansdowne, Ontario

DESIGN OF WASTE DUMPS WITH FLOW-THROUGH ROCK DRAINS by Peter C. Lighthall, C. David Sellars, and W.D. Burton ABSTRACT

U-Shaped Sediment Traps

PW 001 SNOW REMOVAL AND SANDING FOR ROADWAYS AND SIDEWALKS October 6, 2014 (#223-14) Original October 19, 2015; October 15, 2018 Public Works

US82 ROCKFALL MITIGATION PROJECT May, BY Mohammed Ghweir Engineering Geologist Geotechnical Design Section New Mexico DOT

PEACE REGION GRANDE PRAIRIE GEOHAZARD RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM NAD 83 COORDINATES N 6,178,811 E 403,309

Construction Exits Vibration grids

Construction Exits Rock pads

3 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Geotechnical Investigation Proposed Residential Development 99 Beechwood Avenue Ottawa, Ontario

ON CONCAVE SLOPES, landslides usually initiate just above the slope break, where seepage is common.

IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Geotechnical Aspects of Site Evaluation and Foundations in NPPs, NS-G-3.6

Rock Sizing for Batter Chutes

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

Module 9 : Foundation on rocks. Content

Rock Sizing for Small Dam Spillways

Soils. Technical English - I 10 th week

Pressure Head: Pressure head is the height of a column of water that would exert a unit pressure equal to the pressure of the water.

PEACE RIVER EAST HILL - HWY 2:60 (PH2) SELECT PHOTOGRAPHS August 22, 2007 File: Photo E003. Station May 2007

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS G. GEOLOGY AND SOILS

Highland Lake Bathymetric Survey

R.M.HARW & ASSOCIATES LTD. GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED BRIDGE SITE. HELAVA CREEKl MILE MACKENZIE HIGHWAY E-2510 OCTOBER 16, 1973

Snow and Ice Control POLICY NO. P-01/2015. CITY OF AIRDRIE Snow and Ice Control Policy

ADDENDA #1 CONTRACT # C May 3, 2013 Page 1 of 1

12"CMP DIA. ELEV. PVC CI DI CMP VCP RCP RCAP LRCP LCPP STA. LA LB BM-2 ROW PI POT LF TH PVC

GRAVEL INVESTIGATION AREA 9 (KIMEA PIT) SIERRA-YOYO-DESAN ROAD AREA GRAVEL INVESTIGATION NORTHEASTERN, BC. Submitted to:

City of Saginaw Right of Way Division Snow and Ice Removal Policy January 18, 2016

SOIL INVESTIGATION REPORT. PROPOSED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Coral Spring, Trelawny, Jamaica.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Ohio Department of Transportation Division of Production Management Office of Geotechnical Engineering. Geotechnical Bulletin

Appendix C Benchmarking Cost Estimates

Converse Consultants Geotechnical Engineering, Environmental & Groundwater Science, Inspection & Testing Services

INVITATION TO BID CITY OF CAPE CORAL SW 6&7 UTILITIES EXTENSION PROJECT CONTRACT VII CENTRAL AREA 6 AND CENTRAL AREA 8 ITB UT13-02/TM-G

SLOPE STABILITY EVALUATION AND ACCEPTANCE STANDARDS

Rock Sizing for Waterway & Gully Chutes

GEOTECHNICAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL CHAPTER 5 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PLANNING GUIDELINES

Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and Materials Consultants

patersongroup Mineral Aggregate Assessment 3119 Carp Road Ottawa, Ontario Prepared For Mr. Greg LeBlanc March 7, 2014 Report: PH2223-REP.

CENTRAL REGION GEOHAZARDS RISK ASSESSMENT SITE INSPECTION FORM

M E M O R A N D U M. Mr. Jonathan K. Thrasher, P.E., Mr. Ian Kinnear, P.E. (FL) PSI

3.12 Geology and Topography Affected Environment

COUNCIL POLICY MANUAL

December 11, 2006 File:

Sediment Trap. A temporary runoff containment area, which promotes sedimentation prior to discharge of the runoff through a stabilized spillway.

Slope Stability Assessment Proposed Development 4401 Fallowfield Road Lands Ottawa, Ontario Rev-02

Role of the Geotechnical Consultant in Design Build Projects a General Contractors Geotechnical Engineer s Perspective

SECTION AGGREGATE OR GRANULAR SUBBASE

Chutes Part 5: Rock linings

January 12, 2006 File:

Instream Sediment Control Systems

The results of KCB s site inspection observations and our recommendations for further work are presented herein.

Franklin County Engineer's Office - Highway Design Dublin Road And Fishinger Road Improvements Rebid Bid Tabulation

NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES

UNDP HARARE HOSPITAL PROPOSED NATPHARM WAREHOUSE

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION


Final Geotechnical Report Proposed Tower B Multi-Level Building at the Corner of Parkdale Avenue and Bullman Street Ottawa, ON

Subsurface Investigation Proposed Commercial Building 528 March Road Ottawa, Ontario

APPENDIX G APPENDIX G SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DESIGN RATIONALE

August 10, 2007 File:

Prepared for. Mr. Denis A. Verdon 445, Wilson Road Rockland, Ontario K4K 1K7

January 17, 2008 File:

NOTES ON SUBBASE AGGREGATE SPECIFICATION TNZ M/3. These notes must not be included in the Contract Documents.

Continuing Education Associated with Maintaining CPESC and CESSWI Certification

Sediment Trap. At multiple locations within the project site where sediment control is needed.

Low Gradient Velocity Control Short Term Steep Gradient Channel Lining Medium-Long Term Outlet Control Soil Treatment Permanent [1]

patersongroup memorandum 1.0 Field Investigation consulting engineers

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

Transcription:

206-2 - OPSS 206 INDEX 206-2.1 GENERAL 206-2.1.1 Classification of Rock Materials 206-2.1.2 Tender Items 206-2.1.3 Other Excavation Tender Items 206-2.1.4 Specifications 206-2.1.5 Special Provisions 206-2.1.6 Standard Drawings 206-2.2 COMPUTATION 206-2.2.1 Source of Information A. Design Criteria B. Survey Information C. Soils Profile D. Reports E. Field Review 206-2.2.2 Components of Rock Excavation (Grading) A. Rock Cut for Roadways, Interchanges, Detours, Sideroads and Entrances B. Shatter C. Frost Treatment D. Rock Excavation for Intake/Offtake Ditching and Watercourse Correction E. Boulders 91 10 B206-2-1

206-2.2.3 Rock Face 206-2.2.4 Utilization and Disposal of Materials a) Embankment Construction (Rock Fill) b) Swamp Backfill (Rock) c) Frost Heave Backfill d) Structure Backfill (Rock) e) Drainage Gap in Rock Fills. 206-2.2.5 Methods of Calculation A. Manual Computation B. Electronic Computation 206-2.3 DOCUMENTATION A. Contract Drawings B. Contract Documents 91 10 B206-2-2

206-2 - OPSS 206 206-2.1 GENERAL This section deals with the excavation, haulage and placement of rock material, as classified by OPSS 206, and should be read in conjunction with Section B206-1 of this Chapter - "Earth Excavation (Grading)," as the computation methods and balancing of quantities apply to both. Rock excavation in roadway cuts, including detours, utilizes a method called "wall-control blasting," which is a precise method of rock blasting that minimizes the overbreak of rock produced by standard blasting techniques, leaving a vertical rockface. The use of wall-control blasting generates a subsidiary tender item to "Rock Excavation (Grading)" called "Rock Face", which applies in rock cuts and is measured in square metres. The savings realized in the reduction of rock quantities offset the additional costs of precision blasting, while safety conditions are improved by the elimination of irregular walls of jagged rock. Earth material overlying rock formations is termed "earth overburden" and treated as earth. Weathered rock is classified as earth when drilling is not required. On projects where there is rock blasting adjacent to existing pavement which is not listed for removal or resurfacing, it has been found that, irrespective of the type of protection employed, damage to the pavement usually resulted. Therefore, where widening of rock cuts with a height of 1.5 m or more above the roadway surface is required adjacent to existing pavement as noted above, an allowance for the resurfacing of that area of the highway exposed to falling rock will be made. See Section B313 of this Chapter for details. 206-2.1.1 Classification of Rock Materials The following materials when encountered during grading operations usually are treated as rock, and are included in the tender item "Rock Excavation (Grading)": (a) Solid Rock Solid rock means natural beds of hard, cemented parts of the earth's crust (igneous, metamorphic or sedimentary in origin), which may or may not be weathered; the weathered material may be highly or only moderately 91 10 B206-2-3

206-2.1.2 Tender Items (b) Boulders (c) Shatter weathered, but the key is that it has not been moved from its natural bed; as identified in the Geotechnical Report and shown on the Soils Profile. Boulders and fragmented rock measuring 1.0 m 3 or larger. Shatter is the fracturing of solid rock within the road section by the use of explosives, to form a suitable foundation to receive the granular base course, and also to provide drainage of the roadbed. The tender items associated with highway grading in rock are: 1. Rock Excavation (Grading) and includes material from the following operations Rock Cut/Fill and Shatter Ditching 2. Rock Face - roadway - side ditches - transition points - sidewalks - widening - entrances - intake/offtake Boulders - 1.0 m 3 or larger Watercourse Correction Frost Treatment, isolated Commercial Entrances Backfill Requirements This tender item applies to those excavations that are part of the final roadway, whether highway, side road, entrance, detour, etc. 206-2.1.3 Other Excavation Tender Items 91 10 B206-2-4

Rock excavation for the following is not carried out under the item "Rock Excavation (Grading)", but under separate tender items and governing Ontario Provincial Standard Specifications: Culverts Sewers, Manholes, Catchbasins, Ditch Inlets Subdrains Structures These items are detailed elsewhere in this Chapter. 206-2.1.4 Specifications Details of the work of "Rock Excavation (Grading)" and "Rock Face" are contained in OPSS 206. 206-2.1.5 Special Provisions The designer should investigate to determine whether any Standard Special Provisions are required to be included in the contract. 206-2.1.6 Standard Drawings To establish physical limits upon which to base quantities, the designer must be familiar with the Ontario Provincial Standard Drawings Manual - 200 series. 206-2.2 COMPUTATION These are Plan Quantity Payment items. In computing rock quantities - cut and fill - the designer.will subtotal the figures every 350 m along the highway; also on service roads, sideroads, detours, ramps and entrances where the length justifies such a breakdown. Each subtotal will constitute a single-line entry on the "Quantities - Grading" sheet. Where stage construction is proposed, quantities must be considered on a stage basis, as material excavated in one stage may not be available for fill purposes in a different stage. Rock Face quantities are computed for each rock face, left and right sides separately, and listed on the "Quantities -Grading" sheet or Quantities Miscellaneous sheet. 91 10 B206-2-5

At sideroads and entrances the rock face will follow the flare to the end of the individual rock face. 206-2.2.1 Source of Information A. Design Criteria This document contains the approved parameters governing the alignment and cross section of the main roadway in a project. B. Survey Information Field notes are produced by survey crews, and provide details of existing surface features on the main roadway, sideroads and entrances, as well as data for the new horizontal and vertical alignments. Cross sections are recorded by survey crews using rod and level, for plotting either manually or by machine. Surveys and Plans Office also provide cross sections obtained by means of aerial photography. Designers should take the surveys information into consideration to establish the best possible rock line. The final interpretation should be reviewed with the Regional Geotechnical Section C. Soils Profile The Soils Profile shows the existing groundline, rockline, proposed vertical alignment and existing drainage data. Also shown are the relevant soils data and grading and granular base recommendations specified by the Regional Geotechnical Section. D. Reports A number of reports contain data required by the designer to establish cross sections upon which cut and fill quantities will be based. These reports are: E. Field Review Geotechnical Report Preliminary Design Report Environmental Assessment Report 206-2.2.2 Components of Rock Excavation (Grading) A. Rock Cut for Roadways, Interchanges, Detours, 91 10 B206-2-6

Sideroads and Entrances Rock cut is material classified as rock as per OPSS 206, and which is excavated from rockline down to the top of shatter (i.e. bottom of granular sub-base), as outlined in the theoretical section applicable to a particular project. The volume of rock cut is estimated using the end area method, with the appropriate areas determined geometrically, measured by planimeter or electronically computed. Quantities are computed separately for roadways, interchanges, detours, etc., and subtotalled at intervals of 350 m. The designer should investigate cut sections that may require widening beyond the limits set in the standards in order to maintain traffic during stage construction. Where widening is necessary it should be considered as a detour and the appropriate quantities should be included in the tender. Excavated rock is a fully usable material for embankment construction and backfilling, and the total volume computed is considered available for use. When rock blasting adjacent to existing paved surfaces which are not being removed or resurfaced then, an appropriate hot mix surface course quantity must be computed as detailed in chapter B 313-1.1.10 of this Manual. B. Shatter In a rock cut section, to ensure a stable sub-base and provide drainage, the top 0.3 m of rock subgrade is shattered, since continual pounding from traffic and the eroding forces of storm runoff would shift the granular materials, causing pavement failure. To prevent such damage the top 0.3 m of rock grade is "shattered" and the resultant rock fragments left in place to provide a rock "matting" which would hold any granular materials placed. Shatter is not required in a shale subgrade. It may be necessary to shatter deeper than 0.3 m in order to facilitate drainage of the granular base, as shown in Figure B206-2-1. Where this is the case, the total depth of shatter must be shown on the drawings. All shatter shown on the drawings, regardless of depth, is computed at full volume. Shatter quantities are subtotalled at the same breakdown intervals as those for rock cut quantities. C. Frost Treatment 91 10 B206-2-7

Frost heaving of the roadbed may result from water trapped in hollows formed between knobs of rock at shallow depths. Treatment to provide drainage may include rock shatter below subgrade, as shown in Figure B206-2-2. D. Rock Excavation for Intake/Offtake Ditching and Water Course Correction (1) Intake/Offtake Ditching Ditching in rock, other than side ditches in cut sections, usually means intake/offtake ditching at culvert locations. Interceptor/catch ditches are not required on rock surfaces, except if they are a continuation of other ditches. Figure B206-2-3 illustrates the cross section of a typical ditch in rock. The quantity of ditching is calculated from cross sections using depths from a set ditch profile. The material obtained from rock ditching usually is available for embankment construction. Areas of Rock Face are not computed for ditching. Shatter is not required for Rock ditching. (2) Watercourse Correction E. Boulders Watercourse correction is defined as an alteration to a natural watercourse, excluding the lengths of any culverts and culvert aprons. Excavation within the limits of a culvert (and its aprons) is considered part of the work of other tender items and is paid for accordingly. The excavated rock material resulting from watercourse correction although generally accepted as available for fill, is rarely used to fill in the old watercourse; it is more commonly used for embankment construction. Areas of Rock Face are not computed for watercourse correction. The Regional Geotechnical Section, on the basis of field investigations, may include in their report findings an evaluation of boulders (those measuring 1.0 m 3 or larger) existing in some cuts. Because of the difficulty in determining their volume, the Regional Geotechnical section may recommend a percentage factor be used for calculation purposes. After computing the volume of excavation based on an earth cut section, the following procedure should be implemented; 91 10 B206-2-8

Volume of Earth Cut Section 10 000 m 3 Less: Volume of Boulders (10%, or as recommended by Regional Geotechnical Section) 1 000 m 3 Earth Cut Quantity 9 000 m 3 91 10 B206-2-9

206-2.2.3 Rock Face 91 10 B206-2-10

Working from cross sections, the designer will compute the surface area, in square metres, of the rock faces in each rock cut section. The vertical limits of the rock face are top of rock (rockline) to bottom of ditch. The rock face item does not apply to slopes in shale. 206-2.2.4 Utilization and Disposal of Materials Ontario Provincial Standard Specifications state that all rock excavated from roadway cuts, including expanded shatter, shall be placed in roadway embankments. All rock excavated from other sites such as drains, ditches and channels shall, if required and feasible, also be placed in roadway embankments. An attempt should be made to accommodate a maximum of excavated rock in embankments. Only after all possibilities of utilization within the contract limits are extracted should excess materials be designated for disposal outside the R.O.W. Computed quantities need to be adjusted to compensate for expansion due to voids when using broken rock material in roadway embankments or as backfill, and the designer should refer to Appendix "A" to this Chapter for the applicable volume adjustment factor. (a) Embankment Construction (Rock Fill) Rock fill is material available from cuts, shatter, ditching and watercourse corrections in rock, and includes boulders, all of which is placed in the embankment to the cross section of the applicable rock fill standard. Rock material may be placed in sections of earth fill, swamp backfill or any other area recommended by the Regional Geotechnical Section, however, it is designated, calculated and detailed as "Rock Fill". (1) Combination Fills (Rock and Earth) Embankments may consist of both earth and rock materials in varying proportions. When earth is the predominant grading material the earth fill section standard is applied even though the project contains some rock excavation. The method of calculation is as follows: Volume of Fill (based on Earth Fill Section) 10 000 m 3 Less: Available Rock Fill (includes expansion factor) 2 000 m 3 Earth Fill Volume 8 000 m 3 Earth Fill Required (assuming a 15% volume adjustment factor) 9 200 m 3 91 10 B206-2-11

When rock is the predominant grading material the rock fill section standard is applied even though the project contains some earth excavation. The method of calculation is as follows: Volume of Fill (based on Rock Fill Section) 10 000 m 3 Less: Available Rock Fill (includes expansion factor) 9 000 m 3 Earth Fill Volume 1 000 m 3 Earth Fill Required (assuming a 15% volume adjustment factor) 1 150 m 3 In these examples, note that in each case the total quantity of available rock material (major or minor) is utilized before computing earth fill requirements. (2) Rock Fill (Boulders) In earth embankments where boulders from adjacent cuts are used for fill, quantities are adjusted as follows: Volume of Fill 12 000 m 3 Less: Rock Fill (Boulders)* 1 000m 3 Earth Fill Volume 11 000 m 3 Earth Fill Required (assuming a 15% volume adjustment factor) 12 650 m 3 *The rock expansion factor is not applied to boulders placed in earth fills. Boulders, cobbles, and fragments of rock and reclaimed materials should not be disposed of in areas where pile driving for future structures is envisaged. Boulders, etc. can result in piles being "hung up" within this material and not reaching the designed tip elevations. Contract documents should demarcate areas where this option is prohibited i.e. those areas where structures are planned in the future. (b) Swamp Backfill (Rock) Rock may be used as backfill to swamp excavation. (c) Frost Heave Backfill Roadbeds excavated for frost heave treatment will be backfilled with granular material in accordance with Ontario Provincial Standard Drawings, as set out in Section B314 of this Chapter. (d) Structure Backfill (Rock) 91 10 B206-2-12

Concrete structures may be backfilled with rock. In certain circumstances, when granular material is not readily available or in order to reduce high granular costs, rock available for fill may be used as backfill material. Before opting for rock backfill, a cost comparison must be completed to determine the selection of the more economical alternative. When rock is used as structure backfill, a standard Special Provision must be included stating the gradation of the backfill material, together with Standard Drawings. A separate tender item is not required. (e) Drainage Gap in Rock Fills 206-2.2.5 Methods of Calculation When surplus or unsuitable material is designated for flattening rock fills, gaps in the flattening material must be provided at the low point for cross drainage and at other strategic locations according to OPSD. Neglect to provide drainage gaps may result in embankment failure due to hydrostatic pressure or frost action. The location of the drainage gaps should be indicated on the contract drawings by station and standard number. The basic unit of measurement for "Rock Excavation (Grading)" is the cubic metre, and for "Rock Face" the square metre. A. Manual Computation (1) Cross Sections (2) Forms Except for certain volume adjustment factors and the completion of forms, as mentioned in this Section, the methods of calculation for rock quantities are similar to those for earth excavation. Following the measurement of end areas, they are then listed on Form PH-D-420 - "Earth and Rock Quantities," and the computation of volumes for each type of work -rock cut, shatter, ditching, etc., is detailed separately in individual columns. (3) Mass Haul Diagram Mass haul diagrams are to be prepared for all major grading projects, as discussed in Section B206-1 of this Chapter, and to which the designer should refer. 91 10 B206-2-13

B. Electronic Computation Electronic computation of grading quantities has largely replaced manual methods. The designer should refer to Section B206-1 of this Chapter for a list of manuals covering the use of computer programmes. 206-2.3 DOCUMENTATION Documentation procedures (detailing on drawings, quantity sheets and tender forms) for "Rock Excavation (Grading)" follow the principles of those for "Earth Excavation (Grading)" - Section B206-1 of this Chapter. A. Contract Drawings Care must be exercised in the precise interpretation of soils information and boring. The elevations of solid rock formations must be plotted on cross sections and contract profiles. When extensive side cut occurs throughout a project, a typical section should be shown on the drawings, as this condition can greatly affect the bid price for rock, and bidders should be effectively informed. B. Contract Documents Rock excavation volumes, and shatter volumes, shown on the "Quantities Grading" sheet, are extended to the "Rock Material Available" column following incorporation of a suitable volume adjustment (expansion) factor, as set out in Appendix 'A' to this Chapter. The total computed volume of large surface boulders (Rock) must be shown as a separate entry on the "Quantities - Grading" sheet. Rock required for structure backfill shall be identified on the "Quantities - Grading" sheet as "Rock Backfill to Structure," with a separate entry for each structure under the column heading "Fill Required - Rock". When stage construction occurs, quantities must be documented for each separate stage. Material that is to be incorporated inside the right-of-way must have its location shown on the plans and the quantity shown on the "Quantities - Grading" sheet. When it is necessary to dispose of excess material outside the right-of-way, the location of disposal sites is the responsibility of the contractor. When there are only a few entries, Rock Face is shown on the "Quantities - Grading" sheet, within each 350 m breakdown. More numerous entries are shown on the "Quantities - Miscellaneous" sheet, with each rock face shown fully per entry, and not subject to the 350 m breakdown. 91 10 B206-2-14

91 10 B206-2-15