Outline. Basics of interference Types of interferometers. Finite impulse response Infinite impulse response Conservation of energy in beam splitters

Similar documents
Chapter 16. Fraunhofer Diffraction

Basic Interference and. Classes of of Interferometers

f(k) e p 2 (k) e iax 2 (k a) r 2 e a x a a 2 + k 2 e a2 x 1 2 H(x) ik p (k) 4 r 3 cos Y 2 = 4

The condition for maximum intensity by the transmitted light in a plane parallel air film is. For an air film, μ = 1. (2-1)

1 Fundamental Solutions to the Wave Equation

Lens Design II. Lecture 3: Aspheres Herbert Gross. Winter term

Outline. Classes of polarizing devices Polarization states. Eigen-polarization of crystals. Momentum matching at boundaries Polarization calculations

3. Electromagnetic Waves II

TELE4652 Mobile and Satellite Communications

rect_patch_cavity.doc Page 1 of 12 Microstrip Antennas- Rectangular Patch Chapter 14 in Antenna Theory, Analysis and Design (4th Edition) by Balanis

Metrology and Sensing

11) A thin, uniform rod of mass M is supported by two vertical strings, as shown below.

Lecture 04: HFK Propagation Physical Optics II (Optical Sciences 330) (Updated: Friday, April 29, 2005, 8:05 PM) W.J. Dallas

DOING PHYSICS WITH MATLAB COMPUTATIONAL OPTICS

1.2 Differential cross section

SASE Wavefront Propagation Calculations Using SRW

Solutions. V in = ρ 0. r 2 + a r 2 + b, where a and b are constants. The potential at the center of the atom has to be finite, so a = 0. r 2 + b.

Multipole Radiation. February 29, The electromagnetic field of an isolated, oscillating source

Black Body Radiation and Radiometric Parameters:

MCV4U Final Exam Review. 1. Consider the function f (x) Find: f) lim. a) lim. c) lim. d) lim. 3. Consider the function: 4. Evaluate. lim. 5. Evaluate.

SAMPLE PAPER I. Time Allowed : 3 hours Maximum Marks : 70

B. Spherical Wave Propagation

COORDINATE TRANSFORMATIONS - THE JACOBIAN DETERMINANT

Physics 207 Lecture 5. Lecture 5

RADIATION OF ANTENNA ARRAYS WITH GENERALLY ORIENTED DIPOLES

Electromagnetism Physics 15b

Is there a magnification paradox in gravitational lensing?

Electromagnetic scattering. Graduate Course Electrical Engineering (Communications) 1 st Semester, Sharif University of Technology

Physics 411 Lecture 34. Sourced Radiation. Lecture 34. Physics 411 Classical Mechanics II

A Study on atmospheric turbulence with Shearing Interferometer wavefront sensor

Question Bank. Section A. is skew-hermitian matrix. is diagonalizable. (, ) , Evaluate (, ) 12 about = 1 and = Find, if

Chapter 3 Optical Systems with Annular Pupils

Observation of Coherent OTR at LCLS. Unexpected Physics in Standard Beam Diagnostics

Analytical calculation of the power dissipated in the LHC liner. Stefano De Santis - LBNL and Andrea Mostacci - CERN

Mutual impedance between linear elements: The induced EMF method. Persa Kyritsi September 29th, 2005 FRB7, A1-104

Doppler Radar (Fig. 3.1) A simplified block diagram 10/29-11/11/2013 METR

Scattering in Three Dimensions

Qualifying Examination Electricity and Magnetism Solutions January 12, 2006

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cornell University. ECE 303: Electromagnetic Fields and Waves. Fall 2007

Phys 774: Ellipsometry

As is natural, our Aerospace Structures will be described in a Euclidean three-dimensional space R 3.

Exam 3: Equation Summary

Introduction to Arrays

KEPLER S LAWS AND PLANETARY ORBITS

Stanford University CS259Q: Quantum Computing Handout 8 Luca Trevisan October 18, 2012

Radar Systems Engineering Lecture 2 Review of Electromagnetism

r r q Coulomb s law: F =. Electric field created by a charge q: E = = enclosed Gauss s law (electric flux through a closed surface): E ds σ ε0

1 Spherical multipole moments

Lecture 23. Representation of the Dirac delta function in other coordinate systems

The geometric construction of Ewald sphere and Bragg condition:

Physics 506 Winter 2006 Homework Assignment #9 Solutions

Homework # 3 Solution Key

2. Electrostatics. Dr. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum 8/11/ Electromagnetic Field Theory by R. S. Kshetrimayum

2.5 The Quarter-Wave Transformer

cos kd kd 2 cosθ = π 2 ± nπ d λ cosθ = 1 2 ± n N db

Hopefully Helpful Hints for Gauss s Law

Physics 235 Chapter 5. Chapter 5 Gravitation

Department of Chemistry Chapter 4 continued

Amplitude and Phase Fluctuations for Gravitational Waves Propagating through Inhomogeneous Mass Distribution in the Universe

q r 1 4πε Review: Two ways to find V at any point in space: Integrate E dl: Sum or Integrate over charges: q 1 r 1 q 2 r 2 r 3 q 3

Review: Electrostatics and Magnetostatics

Velocimetry Techniques and Instrumentation

Supporting Information. and NaCl at the Air/Aqueous Interface revealed by Heterodyne Detected. Phase-Sensitive Sum Frequency

Rigid Body Dynamics 2. CSE169: Computer Animation Instructor: Steve Rotenberg UCSD, Winter 2018

Vector Control. Application to Induction Motor Control. DSP in Motion Control - Seminar

EKT 345 MICROWAVE ENGINEERING CHAPTER 2: PLANAR TRANSMISSION LINES

Gauss Law. Physics 231 Lecture 2-1

The Great Wave Hokusai. LO: Recognize physical principles associated with terms in sonar equation.

Tutorial on Strehl ratio, wavefront power series expansion, Zernike polynomials expansion in small aberrated optical systems By Sheng Yuan

Graphs of Sine and Cosine Functions

Kepler's 1 st Law by Newton

Welcome to Physics 272

! Frequency Response of LTI Systems. " Magnitude Response. " Phase Response. " Example: Zero on Real Axis. ! We can define a magnitude response

Do not turn over until you are told to do so by the Invigilator.

Class XII - Physics Wave Optics Chapter-wise Problems. Chapter 10

TRAVELING WAVES. Chapter Simple Wave Motion. Waves in which the disturbance is parallel to the direction of propagation are called the

Broadband Noise Predictions Based on a New Aeroacoustic Formulation

where ω 0 is the angular frequency of rotation. Using this, we first examine the time-dependent multipole moments

Water Tunnel Experiment MAE 171A/175A. Objective:

Adiabatic evolution of the constants of motion in resonance (I)

Solution Set #3

LC transfer of energy between the driving source and the circuit will be a maximum.

(r) = 1. Example: Electric Potential Energy. Summary. Potential due to a Group of Point Charges 9/10/12 1 R V(r) + + V(r) kq. Chapter 23.

University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Physics. Electricity & Magnetism Qualifying Examination

PARTIAL COHERENCE AND OPTICAL VORTICES

AE301 Aerodynamics I UNIT B: Theory of Aerodynamics

Physics 121 Hour Exam #5 Solution

General Relativistic Eects on Pulsar Radiation. Dong-Hoon Kim Ewha Womans University

b) (5) What average force magnitude was applied by the students working together?

EELE 3331 Electromagnetic I Chapter 4. Electrostatic fields. Islamic University of Gaza Electrical Engineering Department Dr.

= ρ. Since this equation is applied to an arbitrary point in space, we can use it to determine the charge density once we know the field.

Phys101 Lectures 30, 31. Wave Motion

The nature of electromagnetic radiation.

AH Mechanics Checklist (Unit 2) AH Mechanics Checklist (Unit 2) Circular Motion

Physics 122, Fall October 2012

EKT 356 MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS CHAPTER 2: PLANAR TRANSMISSION LINES

EFFECTS OF FRINGING FIELDS ON SINGLE PARTICLE DYNAMICS. M. Bassetti and C. Biscari INFN-LNF, CP 13, Frascati (RM), Italy

Fundamentals of Photonics Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin Carl Teich

Implementation of RCWA

Inverse Square Law and Polarization

Transcription:

ntefeometes lectue C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Outline Basics of intefeence Tpes of intefeometes Amplitude division Finite impulse esponse nfinite impulse esponse Consevation of eneg in beam splittes Wavefont division Fouie tansfom spectoscop ntefeence testing of abeations

Monochomatic intefeence C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Basics of intefeence + ntefeing plane waves ( ωt k + φ ) j ˆ ( ωt k + φ + e e ) j ˆ e e + + ( ) [( ) ( ) ( )] * eˆ eˆ cos ω ω t k k + φ φ, Real Summation of intensities ntefeence Tpicall we define * eˆ eˆ dentical polaization states ω K Φ ω k k π ˆ Λ G K G φ φ Yielding [ K + Φ] + + cos G Stationa finges Finges of peiod Λ and diection Kˆ G Phase shift Finge modulation depth, m Λ ma min m ma ma m + min min +

Monochomatic intefeence C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Basics of intefeence + ntefeing spheical waves j( ωt k + φ ) j( ωt k + φ ) ( ) eˆ e + ( ) eˆ e [ Φ] * ( R ) + ( R ) + ( eˆ eˆ ) ( R ) ( R ) cos k( R R ) Summation of intensities ntefeence Tpicall R we define i i ( R R ) Φ nπ k k ( R R ) Φ ( n )π + Distance fom focus Maima when path length diffeence n λ Minima Can sketch intefeence patten b connecting the dots : Hpebolas R R 3

Tpes of intefeometes Amplitude division C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Amplitude division Finite-impulse esponse intefeometes S S / Twman Geen Michelson S n ( )ds Mach-Zende Optical path length + + cos [ k S] + + πν cos S c ν c S Fee-spectal ange.8.6.4. - - 4

Tpes of intefeometes Amplitude division C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Amplitude division nfinite-impulse esponse intefeometes Fab-Peot intefeomete, aka talon d S nd cosθ tans inc jk S jk S [ tt + tte + tte +...] This is a geometic seies. Witing R, T t T tans inc + F sin π ν ν F 4R ( R) ν c S c nd cosθ.8 F.6.4 F. F 4 6 8 5

Tpes of intefeometes Beam splittes C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Beam splitting Consevation of eneg t t Two identical fields incident on a beam splitte with amplitude eflectivit and amplitude tansmittance t: + t + t + + Consevation of eneg t + t + t + t φ φ φ φ + π * t * * t t * Divide though b + t t * * t φ φ π t Thus, thee must be a π/ phase shift on amplitude division. 6

Tpes of intefeometes Wavefont division C 566 Adv. Optics Lab ntefeometes Wavefont division intefeomet tot ( ) What is given N identical apetues which adiate an electic field? ap ( ) tot A N ( ) ( ) N n ap ap ( ) δ ( ) n n ( ) A( ) d n n A is the aa function We know that the adiation in the Faunhofe egime (angula spectum at infinite distance o in back focal plane of lens) is given b the Fouie tansfom of the electic field in the nea field: tot ( k ) F{ ( tot )} ( k ) A( k ) ap Convolution in space becomes multiplication in k-space ARRAY THORM: Diffaction fom aa is diffaction fom apetue multiplied b the FT of the aa distibution. Renolds, DeVelis, Paent, Thompson, Phsical Optics Notebook, SP, 989 7

Tpes of intefeometes Wavefont division C 566 Adv. Optics Lab ample Single and double slits L tot ( ) Sinc k L π L Sinc λ f ap / ( ) ect( L) f Sceen L L d tot ( ) Sinc k π L Sinc λ f L cos k d f π d cos λ f ap ( ) ect( / L) f A δ d + δ + d ( ) ( ) ( ) Sceen. 5 -. 5 - - - 8

Spectoscop and patial coheence C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Fouie tansfom spectoscop w/ Michelson intefeomete Powe spectum P ( k) / Path-length change () Detected ( ) ( + cos k ) P( k) P + P ( k) ( k) [ ( ) ] e jk dk dk jk e dk ntegate intefeence ove all wave-numbes () is Fouie tansfom of P(k) So P(k) is invese Fouie tansfom of () () P( k) F - 9

Spectoscop and patial coheence C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Coheence length mpotant app of FT spectoscop mpotant definitions and elations. t t ν t Coheence time: duation of single-fequenc opeation Bandwidth: single line width o multi-mode oscillation l c t c ν λ λ Coheence length: coheence time measued in [m] ample: ectangula spectum of bandwidth ν k + k / ( ) jk k + e dk + cc + sinc ( k ) cos k k / P( k) k π ν c () Visibilit k k o Finge modulation depth m (aka visibilit) goes to zeo at: π k c ν l c t Don t need to FT to get this impotant paamete

ntefeence testing of abeations ntoduction C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Wavefont abeations Geneal pictue Refeence sphee Wavefont Ra abeation Object Paaial focus ntance pupil it pupil A spheical wavefont in the eit pupil foms a pefect focus The diffeence between the actual wavefont and the efeence sphee is the wavefont abeation. Non-spheical wavefonts cause as to coss the optical ais NOT at the paaial focus a abeation

ntefeence testing of abeations ntoduction C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Coodinate sstem and appoach ρ θ Object Paaial image plane ntance pupil. Assume a otationall-smmetic optical sstem. pand the wavefont abeation in the pupil in a polnomial of the object a paametes (, ρ, θ). 3. Reject all tems which don t meet smmet assumption.

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Spheical abeation 4 W 4 ρ Wavefont eo in pupil W 4 - - -3.5-4 - -.5.5 -.5 ntefeogam - 3

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Spheical abeation at CLC W 4 3 ( ρ ) 4 ρ Wavefont eo in pupil W 4.5 -.5.5 ntefeogam - - -.5.5 - -.5 4

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Coma W 3 3 ρ cosθ W3 ρ Wavefont eo in pupil W 3 -.5 - - -.5 ntefeogam.5 - -.5 5

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Astigmatism W ρ cos θ W Wavefont eo in pupil W -.5 -.5 -.75.5 ntefeogam - - -.5.5 - -.5 6

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Astigmatism at CLC W ( ρ θ ρ ) W ( ) cos Wavefont eo in pupil W.5.5 -.5.5 -.5 - -.5 ntefeogam.5 - -.5 7

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Field cuvatue W ρ Wavefont eo in pupil W -.5 - -.5.5 ntefeogam - - -.5.5 - -.5 8

ntefeence testing of abeations C 566 Adv. Optics Lab Distotion 3 W3 ρ cos θ W 3 3 Wavefont eo in pupil W 3.5 -.5.5 - - -.5 ntefeogam.5 - -.5 9