GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION

Similar documents
Conventional Field Testing & Issues (SPT, CPT, DCPT, Geophysical methods)

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

A Comparison of Four Geophysical Methods for Determining the Shear Wave Velocity of Soils

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Mechanical Wave Measurements. Electromagnetic Wave Techniques. Geophysical Methods GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION. Mechanical Wave Geophysics

Shear Wave Velocity Comparisons; Surface Wave, Downhole and SCPT Measurement Methods - A Case History

A study on nonlinear dynamic properties of soils

Estimation of Shear Wave Velocity Using Correlations

Vertical Shear-Wave Velocity Profiles Generated from Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves: Field Examples

IN SITU TESTING TECHNOLOGY FOR FOUNDATION & EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING. Wesley Spang, Ph.D., P.E. AGRA Earth & Environmental, Inc.

Enhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization. Graduate Course CEE 6423

B-1 BORE LOCATION PLAN. EXHIBIT Drawn By: 115G BROOKS VETERINARY CLINIC CITY BASE LANDING AND GOLIAD ROAD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

Geophysical Site Investigation (Seismic methods) Amit Prashant Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual

UChile - LMMG Shear Wave Velocity (V S. ): Measurement, Uncertainty, and Utility in Seismic Hazard Analysis. Robb Eric S. Moss, Ph.D., P.E.

SOME OBSERVATIONS RELATED TO LIQUEFACTION SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SILTY SOILS


Field measurement of shear wave velocity of soils

Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

Liquefaction and Foundations


SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Geotechnical Subsoil Investigation for the Design of Water Tank Foundation

DEVELOPMENT OF EMPIRICAL CORRELATION BETWEEN SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY AND STANDARD PENETRATION RESISTANCE IN SOILS OF CHENNAI CITY

(THIS IS ONLY A SAMPLE REPORT OR APPENDIX OFFERED TO THE USERS OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAM

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services Development Engineering Section

Geotechnical Aspects of the Seismic Update to the ODOT Bridge Design Manual. Stuart Edwards, P.E Geotechnical Consultant Workshop

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Soils. Technical English - I 10 th week

Investigation of Liquefaction Behaviour for Cohesive Soils

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Micro Seismic Hazard Analysis

Soil Properties - II

Chapter 7 GEOMECHANICS

LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS OF STIFFNESS OF SOFT CLAY USING BENDER ELEMENTS

Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation

A thesis presented to. the faculty of. the Russ College of Engineering and Technology of Ohio University. In partial fulfillment

Theory of Shear Strength

CPT Applications - Liquefaction 2

Module 3. DYNAMIC SOIL PROPERTIES (Lectures 10 to 16)

Soil Mechanics Brief Review. Presented by: Gary L. Seider, P.E.

Station Description Sheet STE

Cyclic Behavior of Sand and Cyclic Triaxial Tests. Hsin-yu Shan Dept. of Civil Engineering National Chiao Tung University

J. Paul Guyer, P.E., R.A.

LIQUEFACTION ASSESSMENT OF INDUS SANDS USING SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY

(C) Global Journal of Engineering Science and Research Management

Theory of Shear Strength

Evaluation of Geotechnical Hazards

Evaluation of soil liquefaction using the CPT Part 2

APPENDIX A. Borehole Logs Explanation of Terms and Symbols

Depth (ft) USCS Soil Description TOPSOIL & FOREST DUFF


Prof. Dr.-Ing. Martin Achmus Institute of Soil Mechanics, Foundation Engineering and Waterpower Engineering. Offshore subsoil investigations

This document downloaded from vulcanhammer.net vulcanhammer.info Chet Aero Marine

POST CYCLIC SHEAR STRENGTH OF FINE GRAINED SOILS IN ADAPAZARI TURKEY DURING 1999 KOCAELI EARTHQUAKE

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

Introduction to Cone Penetration Testing

Manual on Subsurface Investigations National Highway Institute Publication No. FHWA NHI Federal Highway Administration Washington, DC

Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data

Evaluation of liquefaction resistance of non-plastic silt from mini-cone calibration chamber tests

Liquefaction: Additional issues. This presentation consists of two parts: Section 1

Soil Dynamics Prof. Deepankar Choudhury Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay

Evaluation of the Liquefaction Potential by In-situ Tests and Laboratory Experiments In Complex Geological Conditions

GEOTECHNICAL EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING

VMS-GeoMil. Background

Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of soils

SOIL MECHANICS AND APPLIED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTAL FACTS OF SOIL BEHAVIOR

EVALUATION OF STRENGTH OF SOILS AGAINST LIQUEFACTION USING PIEZO DRIVE CONE

Appendix J. Geological Investigation

LIQUEFACTION OF SILT-CLAY MIXTURES

Gotechnical Investigations and Sampling

CENTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING STUDIES

Project S4: ITALIAN STRONG MOTION DATA BASE. Deliverable # D3. Definition of the standard format to prepare descriptive monographs of ITACA stations

SITE INVESTIGATION 1

APPENDIX C. Borehole Data

EFFECTIVE STRESS ANALYSES OF TWO SITES WITH DIFFERENT EXTENT OF LIQUEFACTION DURING EAST JAPAN EARTHQUAKE

Geotechnical Data Report

Evaluation of soil liquefaction using the CPT Part 1

ENCE 3610 Soil Mechanics. Site Exploration and Characterisation Field Exploration Methods

Advanced Foundation Engineering

SI Planning & Laboratory Testing for Hill-Site Development

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

Determining G-γ Degradation Curve in Cohesive Soils by Dilatometer and in situ Seismic Tests

REPORT OF PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. Coastal Technology Park. Georgetown County, South Carolina S&ME Project No.

Chapter 5 Shear Strength of Soil

Amplification of Seismic Motion at Deep Soil Sites

Station Description Sheet GRA

Ground Motions and Liquefaction Potential

NEW DOWN-HOLE PENETROMETER (DHP-CIGMAT) FOR CONSTRUCTION APPLICATIONS

CPT Guide 5 th Edition. CPT Applications - Deep Foundations. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar # /2/2013

Reinforced Soil Structures Reinforced Soil Walls. Prof K. Rajagopal Department of Civil Engineering IIT Madras, Chennai

Geotechnical Site Classification and Croatian National Annex for EC 8

H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)

LECTURE 10. Module 3 : Field Tests in Rock 3.6 GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATION

Transcription:

GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION Neil Anderson, Ph.D. Professor of Geology and Geophysics Richard W. Stephenson, P.E., Ph.D. Professor of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering University of Missouri-Rolla (UMR) Geotechnical and Bridge Seismic Design Workshop New Madrid Seismic Zone Experience October 28-29, 29, 2004, Cape Girardeau, Missouri Site Charact. - 1 Outline Objectives of exploration program Exploration Program Drilling and sampling Geophysical testing Results of exploration program Subsurface stratigraphy Soil properties Shear wave velocity profiles Site Classification Strain-dependent shear modulus and damping functions Final Comments Site Charact. - 2 1

OBJECTIVES Determine strain-dependent shear modulus and damping characteristics of subsoil Identify soil strata prone to liquefaction Site Charact. - 3 Major Issues Deep unconsolidated soils High ground water levels High levels of ground motion Site Charact. - 4 2

GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION PROGRAM Site Site Charact. - 5 Field Exploration Program Drilling Failing 1500 Rotary with mud Truck mounted Normal capacity -1500 ft deep and 2-in to 13-in diameters - 4.5 in for this project Site Charact. - 6 3

Hollow Stem Auger 80 to 200 feet deep SPT Tests Automatic safety hammer Sampling Every 5 feet for first 25 feet Every 10 feet below 25 foot depth Cohesionless soils Standard and oversize split spoon samples Cohesive Soils Seamless steel tubes (Shelby Tubes) Site Charact. - 7 Site Charact. - 8 4

Cone Penetration Testing Continuous log of : Tip Resistance Side Sleeve Friction Pore Water Pressures CPT & SCPT Manufacturer: Hogentogler Co. Electronic Subtraction Cone Tip resistance Local resistance Pore pressure Inclination Downhole seismic velocity Temperature Site Charact. - 9 Pushing Rigs - CME 850 Cone tip saturated in vacuum with glycerin Push speed 20 cm/s Site Charact. - 10 5

Site Charact. - 11 Site Charact. - 12 6

Typical Cone/SPT Data Site Charact. - 13 GEOPHYSICAL TESTING Seismic Cone Penetration Cross-Hole Seismic Velocity Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) Site Charact. - 14 7

CROSS-HOLE SEISMIC Technique employs twinned (or tripled) boreholes completed at the base of the zone of interest and separated by surface distances on the order of 3 to 4 m. (Subsurface separ- ations are determined using a borehole inclinometer.) Site Charact. - 15 Z S R X CH SEISMIC Shear-wave source lowered to base of one borehole; triaxial geophone lowered to same depth in adjacent borehole. Hammer source is discharged twice - with opposite directional impacts - thereby generating two opposite-polarity polarity shear-wave records. Site Charact. - 16 8

CROSS-HOLE SEISMIC Source and geophone are raised (at regular intervals) to top of borehole. Interval shear-wave velocities (V( int ) calculated for each layer tested on the basis of borehole separation ( ( x) and shear-wave travel time ( t).( Vint = x/ x/ t Z S R X Site Charact. - 17 CROSS-HOLE SEISMIC Strengths: : Cross-borehole tool is theoretically capable of providing more accurate in-situ, shear-wave interval velocities than either the SCPT or MASW techniques. Weaknesses: : Related to cost and site accessibility, as twinned boreholes are required. Site Charact. - 18 9

SEISMIC CONE PENETROMETER Employs a down-hole geophone and surface source. As SCPT cone is pressed into the soil, it is halted at predetermined depths and surface shear-wave source is discharged. The travel time of the shear-wave energy ( T n ) is measured for each SCPT test depth (Z n ). Z n Site Charact. - 19 SEISMIC CONE PENETROMETER An interval velocity is then calculated for each depth interval. Z Site Charact. - 20 10

CPT data including SCPT velocity profile. Site Charact. - 21 SEISMIC CONE PENETROMETER Strengths: If all travel times are measured accurately, the SCPT tool is capable of providing accurate interval velocities for layers with thicknesses on the order of 1 m. Weaknesses: If all travel times are not accurately measured, the output interval velocities will be inaccurate. Site Charact. - 22 11

SASW TECHNIQUE Rayleigh waves are generated using active and/or passive sources. In a heterogeneous earth, shearwave and compressional-wave velocities vary with depth. Hence, the different component frequencies of Rayleigh waves exhibit different phase velocities. Site Charact. - 23 SASW TECHNIQUE The phase velocity of each component frequency is a function of the variable body wave velocities over the vertical depth range of particle motion associated with that specific wavelength. Site Charact. - 24 12

During processing, phase velocities are calculated for each component frequency of the recorded Rayleigh waves. SASW TECHNIQUE Site Charact. - 25 Dispersion curve (phase velocity vs. frequency) is inverted and shear-wave velocity profile is generated. Site Charact. - 26 13

SASW TECHNIQUE Strength: : The technique can be used in areas where the SCPT cannot be employed. SASW data are relatively inexpensive to acquire. Weakness: : Depth of investigation is limited by source. Vs/Vp Vp ratios must be estimated during inversion. Site Charact. - 27 Wahite Ditch Site Site Charact. - 28 14

m/sec 0 200 400 600 800 1000 0 Depth (m) 10 20 30 40 50 Vs(SASW) Vs(CH) Vs(OLD) Vs(XCPT) 60 70 80 Wahite Ditch Site Site Charact. - 29 Interlayered fine to course grained sands with scattered gravelly layers Fat clay with sand Mostly fine to course grained gray and tan sands Light gray and tan finegrained sand SASW Velocities Site Charact. - 30 15

CH Velocities CH velocities correlate well with SASW data. SASW velocities increase step-wise from ~130 m/s to ~350 m/s. Same interval on the BH profile is characterized by shearwave velocities that increase gradually from about ~150 to ~380 m/s. Site Charact. - 31 SCPT Velocities Near-surface (<6 m) clays characterized by SCPT shearwave velocities ranging from ~100-240 m/s. Highest velocities are observed at depths of ~3 m. Underlying sands are characterized by velocities on the order of 400 m/s. Values are significantly higher than SASW and crossborehole velocities over same lithology/ same depth intervals. Site Charact. - 32 16

Conclusions SASW-derived shear-wave velocity profiles correlate well with subsurface lithologic logs & available cross-borehole shear-wave velocity control. Clays, silts and sands exhibit relatively character- istic SASW-derived shear-wave velocities, which increase step-wise with depth of burial. The SASW and BH shear-wave velocity profiles and borehole lithologic data do not correlate particularly well with the SCPT shear-wave velocity profiles particularly at shallow depths. Site Charact. - 33 Testing Program Site Charact. - 34 17

Bridge A1466 Test type CPT SCPT Borehole Number 4 3 2 1 2 Depth (ft) 23~65 40~66 80 100 200 Note An observation well was installed at one 80 borehole. Two 200 boreholes were used for cross-hole geophysical test. Site Charact. - 35 Bridge L472 Test type CPT SCPT Borehole Number 4 3 2 2 Depth (ft) 41~54 36~41 80 100 Note P1 and P2 were moved from the bottom to the top of slope due to the soft soil after raining Site Charact. - 36 18

LAYOUT OF EXPLORATION Bridge A-1466 County road I-55 I-55 S3 I-55 S1 I-55 B3 P1 B1 A-1466 P2 B2 P3 S2 B4 B5 P4 Legend: N 100ft borehole 80ft borehole CPT SCPT Cross hole SASW Site Charact. - 37 LAYOUT OF EXPLORATION Bridge L-472 N S3 I-55 Access Road S1 P4 I-55 B3 P3 S2 B1 P1 L-472 River B4 B2 P2 Legend: 80ft borehole 100ft CPT borehole 80ft borehole Piezocone Seismic Piezocone SASW Site Charact. - 38 19

CPT CLASSIFICATION Based on UBC83 Tip resistance Friction ratio Laboratory classification tests Site Charact. - 39 A1466 Site Charact. - 40 20

L472 Site Charact. - 41 DEEP SOIL PROPERTIES CPT maximum depth ~ 20 m (60 ft) SPT maximum depth ~ 60 m (200 ft) Depth of soil profile: 650 to 720 m (2100-2400 2400 ft) Must determine necessary soil properties from available correlations Site Charact. - 42 21

Soils at depth were classified from water well log descriptions Well No. 2 was drilled in 1949 at Steele. 720 m deep. Well No. 4 was drilled in 1947 at Hayti 650 m deep Site Charact. - 43 CORRELATIONS Unit Weight (Mayne, 2001) Sat. Unit Weight, γ T (kn/m 3 ) 28 26 24 22 20 18 16 14 12 Unit Weight Estimation Saturated Soil Materials: γ T (kn/m 3 ) = 8.32 log V s - 1.61 Log z with V s (m/s) and depth z (m) n = 727 r 2 = 0.808 S.E. = 1.05 Intact Clays Silts Sands Weathered Rx z (m) = 1 Fissured Clays Peat Gravels Intact Rocks 10 10 100 1000 10000 Site Charact. - 44 Shear Wave Velocity, V s (m/s) 10 100 Additional n = 163 Rock Materials 22

Internal friction angle, Φ Schmertmann, 1975) ' [ N /12.2 20.3σ / ] 0. 34 v P 1 φ ' tan 60 + Site Charact. - 45 0 a Deep soils without SPT N values: Terzaghi, et al., 1996 Site Charact. - 46 23

Cohesive Soils Mesri,, 1993 Site Charact. - 47 SHEAR WAVE VELOCITIES Shear wave velocity (m/s) 0 200 400 600 800 0 Depth (m) 10 20 30 40 as1 as2 CH SASW 50 60 A1466 70 Site Charact. - 48 24

0 Shear wave velocity (m/s) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Depth (m) 10 20 30 40 ls1 ls2 ls3 SASW 50 60 70 L472 Site Charact. - 49 Maximum Shear Modulus G = ρv max 2 s - mass density ρ- mass density v s -shear wave velocity - shear wave velocity G (2.973 e) 1 + e 2 k 0.5 max = 1230OCR ( σ 0) OCR-overconsolidation ratio e-void ratio σ 0 -mean principal effective stress k-function of PI Site Charact. - 50 25

Comparison of (Gmax)field/(Gmax)correlation at B3 of A1466 Ratio of G max SCPT/Hardin SASW/Hardin Cross-hole/Hardin CL (0~5.5 m) 0.87 3.13 0.95 ML (5.5~9.1 m) 0.87 3.18 0.81 SM (9.1~13.2 m) 1.57 1.50 0.82 SP (13.2~21.3 m) - 0.74 0.45 SP-SM (21.3~25.6 m) - 0.70 0.66 Overall 1.06 1.30 0.68 Site Charact. - 51 Comparison of (Gmax)field/(Gmax)correlation at B1 of L472 Ratio of G max CL (0~3.7 m) OH (3.7~5.2 m) CL (5.2~6.4 m) CH (6.4~8.5 m) SM (8.5~11.6 m) SP-SM(11.6~25.6 m) Overall SCPT/Hardin 0.58 1.41 0.70 0.35 0.37-0.60 SASW/Hardin 0.56 1.18 0.71 0.67 0.47 0.87 0.79 Site Charact. - 52 26

SHEAR WAVE VELOCITY FROM SPT TESTING 300 Shear wave velocity (m/s) 200 100 Vs = 107N 0.215 R 2 = 0.4045 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 N (SPT) V s = 107N Site Charact. - 53 0.215 COMPARISON TO PUBLISHED VALUES 500 Shear wave velocity (m/s) 400 300 200 100 Shibata (1970-sand) Imai & Yashimura (1990-all) Seed, et al (1983-sand) Sykora & Stokoe (1983-granular) Lee (1990-sand) JRA (1980-sand) Oht, et al. (1972-sands) Yokota, et al. (1991-all) This study (sand) 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 N (SPT) Site Charact. - 54 27

SOIL PROFILE AT BRIDGE SITE A1466 Site Charact. - 55 Site Charact. - 56 28

SOIL PROFILE AT BRIDGE SITE L472 Site Charact. - 57 Site Charact. - 58 29

SITE CLASSIFICATION Based on National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP). Site Charact. - 59 Site Class A Hard rock with v s > 1500 m/s Description B C D E F < 15 Rock 760 m/s < v s 1500 m/s Very dense soil and soft rock with 360 m/s< v s 760 m/s Stiff soil with v s < 180 m/s or with 15 N 50 or 50 kpa s u 180 m/s 100 kpa v s A soil profile with v s < 180 m/s or with either N 15, s u <50 kpa or any profile with ore than 10 ft (3 m) of soft clay defined as soil with PI>20, w 40 %, and s u < 25 kpa Soils requiring site-specific evaluations: 1. Soils vulnerable to potential failure or collapse under seismic loading such as liquefiable soils, quick and highly sensitive clays, and collapsible weakly cemented soils. 3. Peats and/or highly organic clays (H > 3 m of peat and/or highly organic clay where H = thickness of soil) 3. Very high plasticity clays (H > 8 m with PI > 75) 4. Very thick soft/medium stiff clays (H > 36 m) Site Charact. - 60 30

Site Class A B C D E F Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration at Short Periods S s 0.25 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.6 3.5 a S s = 0.50 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.7 a S s = 0.75 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 a S s = 1.00 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 0.9 a S s 0.25 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 A Site Charact. - 61 Site Class Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration at long Periods S l 0.1 S l = 0.2 S l = 0.3 S l = 0.4 S l 0.5 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 D 3.4 3.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 E 3.5 3.2 3.8 3.4 3.4 F a a a a A Site Charact. - 62 31

BRIDGE SITE A1466 Geophysical tests S1 S2 S3 Crosshole SASW Depth (m) 13.92 20.23 6.55 30.50 29.28 V S (m/s) 135.96 171.53 220.01 178.06 241.78 Borings B1 B2 B3 Depth (m) 21.65 23.56 25.6 N 22 20 8.56 Site Class E-Based on average shear wave velocity from cross-hole test Site Class D-Based on average shear wave velocity from SASW test Site Charact. - 63 BRIDGE SITE L472 Geophysical tests S1 S2 S3 SASW Depth (m) 11.90 13.50 14.07 30 v s (m/s) 133.02 130.45 128.54 193.10 Borings B1 B2 B3 B4 Depth (m) 25.6 31.1 31.1 25.6 N 11.54 17.63 13.88 8.59 Site Class D-Based on average shear wave velocity from SASW test Site Charact. - 64 32

INCONSISTENCIES Maybe classified as: D based on average shear wave velocity E based on average SPT values Classification based on Western United States conditions New Madrid zone is much different Little data on deep soil properties Site Charact. - 65 DYNAMIC SOIL PROPERTIES Site Charact. - 66 33

SHEAR MODULUS AND DAMPING RATIO AT LOW STRAIN LEVELS Measured from: Shear wave velocity measurements Field (geophysical testing) Laboratory Laboratory Resonant column Ultrasonic velocity Site Charact. - 67 Influencing parameters Soil type Density (void ratio) Overconsolidation ratio (OCR) Effective confining stresses Site Charact. - 68 34

1.0 Shear Modulus of Shear Strain γ Shear Modulus of γ=10-8 percent 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Range of values for data 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1 Shear strain, γ -percent Site Charact. - 69 Site Charact. - 70 35

We found more than two dozen published correlation equations for strain-dependent shear modulus and damping. Site Charact. - 71 Conclusions Gmax increases with PI and time increasing for cohesive soil. Gmax is not sensitive to confining duration time for sandy soil. Gmax increases and damping ratio at small strain decreases with confining pressure increasing and Gmax is independent of loading frequency. Grain size, grain shape, gradation, degree of saturation, and frequency of vibration introduce insignificant effects on shear modulus of sands. G/Gmax and D are not sensitive to confining pressure and OCR but highly dependent on PI for cohesive soils. It increases with PI decreasing. Site Charact. - 72 36

The effect of loading frequency on G/Gmax reduction curves can be negligible. G/Gmax increases and D decreases with confining pressure increasing for sand. G/G 0 and D is relatively confining pressure independent for clayey sands. Site Charact. - 73 G/G max 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Relationships used for this study: Damping ratio EPRI-6~15m Ishibashi-6~15m EPRI-15~37m Ishibashi-15~37m EPRI-37~76m Ishibashi-37~76m EPRI-76~152m Ishibashi-76~152m EPRI-152~305m Ishibashi-152~305m 0.1 0 0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 Strain Site Charact. - 74 37

0.6 EPRI-6~15m Ishibashi-6~15m Damping ratio 0.4 0.2 EPRI-15~37m Ishibashi-15~37m EPRI-37~76m Ishibashi-37~76m EPRI-76~152m Ishibashi-76~152m EPRI-152~305m 1 Ishibashi-152~305m 0 0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 Strain Site Charact. - 75 Final Comments Hampered by lack of deep exploration boreholes in the NMSZ Lack of information on the effect of high confining pressures on soil properties Lack of information on the behavior of silty soils, i.e., ML,SM, etc. Site Charact. - 76 38

Future Work Comprehensive Laboratory Study of silts, silty clays Site Charact. - 77 Stress path Triaxial Site Charact. - 78 39

Cyclic Simple Shear Site Charact. - 79 Ultrasonic Velocity Site Charact. - 80 40

Resonant Column Site Charact. - 81 41