6QRZPHOWPRGHOOLQJXVLQJ5DGDUVDWGDWD

Similar documents
SNOW COVER MONITORING IN ALPINE REGIONS WITH COSMO-SKYMED IMAGES BY USING A MULTITEMPORAL APPROACH AND DEPOLARIZATION RATIO

Modelling runoff from large glacierized basins in the Karakoram Himalaya using remote sensing of the transient snowline

PROGRESS IN ADDRESSING SCIENCE GOALS FOR SNOW MONITORING BY MEANS OF SAR

Snow Cover Applications: Major Gaps in Current EO Measurement Capabilities

III. Publication III. c 2004 Authors

THE INVESTIGATION OF SNOWMELT PATTERNS IN AN ARCTIC UPLAND USING SAR IMAGERY

ESTIMATING SNOWMELT CONTRIBUTION FROM THE GANGOTRI GLACIER CATCHMENT INTO THE BHAGIRATHI RIVER, INDIA ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

ADVANCEMENTS IN SNOW MONITORING

RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF GLACIER CONTRIBUTIONS TO STREAMFLOW IN A CHANGING CLIMATE

Prospects of microwave remote sensing for snow hydrology

MULTI-POLARISATION MEASUREMENTS OF SNOW SIGNATURES WITH AIR- AND SATELLITEBORNE SAR

EVALUATION AND MONITORING OF SNOWCOVER WATER RESOURCES IN CARPATHIAN BASINS USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION AND SATELLITE DATA

Modelling snow accumulation and snow melt in a continuous hydrological model for real-time flood forecasting

The Importance of Snowmelt Runoff Modeling for Sustainable Development and Disaster Prevention

Estimation of snow cover over large mountainous areas using Radarsat ScanSAR

Monitoring the ice cover evolution of a medium size river from RADARSAT-1 : preliminary results

SAR Coordination for Snow Products

MONITORING OF SEASONAL SNOW COVER IN YAMUNA BASIN OF UTTARAKAHND HIMALAYA USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES

Central Asia Regional Flash Flood Guidance System 4-6 October Hydrologic Research Center A Nonprofit, Public-Benefit Corporation

Flood Forecasting Tools for Ungauged Streams in Alberta: Status and Lessons from the Flood of 2013

CHARACTERISTICS OF SNOW AND ICE MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES DERIVED FROM MULTI-POLARIZATION TERRASAR-X DATA

SNOW MASS RETRIEVAL BY MEANS OF SAR INTERFEROMETRY

Snow cover monitoring and modelling in the Alps using multi temporal MODIS data

CHAPTER-7 INTERFEROMETRIC ANALYSIS OF SPACEBORNE ENVISAT-ASAR DATA FOR VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION

SNOW COVER DURATION MAPS IN ALPINE REGIONS FROM REMOTE SENSING DATA

Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) of dry snow derived from InSAR -theory and results from ERS Tandem SAR data

RADAR Remote Sensing Application Examples

Developments for a semi-distributed runoff modelling system and its application in the drainage basin Ötztal. Diplomarbeit

Snowmelt runoff forecasts in Colorado with remote sensing

Evaluation of sub-kilometric numerical simulations of C-band radar backscatter over the french Alps against Sentinel-1 observations

MONITORING OF GLACIAL CHANGE IN THE HEAD OF THE YANGTZE RIVER FROM 1997 TO 2007 USING INSAR TECHNIQUE

Discritnination of a wet snow cover using passive tnicrowa ve satellite data

Inter-linkage case study in Pakistan

Radar mapping of snow melt over mountain glaciers in High Mountain Asia Mentor: Tarendra Lakhankar Collaborators: Nir Krakauer, Kyle MacDonald and

Analysis of High Resolution Multi-frequency, Multipolarimetric and Interferometric Airborne SAR Data for Hydrologic Model Parameterization

Climate also has a large influence on how local ecosystems have evolved and how we interact with them.

Using MODIS imagery to validate the spatial representation of snow cover extent obtained from SWAT in a data-scarce Chilean Andean watershed

Comparison between Multitemporal and Polarimetric SAR Data for Land Cover Classification

SNOW COVER MAPPING USING METOP/AVHRR AND MSG/SEVIRI

THE USE OF MERIS SPECTROMETER DATA IN SEASONAL SNOW MAPPING

APPLICATION OF AN ARCTIC BLOWING SNOW MODEL

TEMPORAL VARIABILITY OF ICE FLOW ON HOFSJÖKULL, ICELAND, OBSERVED BY ERS SAR INTERFEROMETRY

HyMet Company. Streamflow and Energy Generation Forecasting Model Columbia River Basin

MSG/SEVIRI AND METOP/AVHRR SNOW EXTENT PRODUCTS IN H-SAF

Evaluation of distributed snowpack simulation with in-situ and remote sensing information in Arveupper catchment

Operational snowmelt runoff forecasting in the Spanish Pyrenees using the snowmelt runoff model

Validation of passive microwave snow algorithms

The Potential of High Resolution Satellite Interferometry for Monitoring Enhanced Oil Recovery

SNOWMELT RUNOFF ESTIMATION OF A HIMALIYAN WATERSHED THROUGH REMOTE SENSING, GIS AND SIMULATION MODELING

LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION BASED ON SAR DATA IN SOUTHEAST CHINA

Studies of Austfonna ice cap (Svalbard) using radar altimetry with other satellite techniques

2015 Fall Conditions Report

Snowcover interaction with climate, topography & vegetation in mountain catchments

Hydro-meteorological Analysis of Langtang Khola Catchment, Nepal

Climatic Change Implications for Hydrologic Systems in the Sierra Nevada

SAR Remote Sensing of Snow Parameters in Norwegian Areas Current Status and Future Perspective

Regional influence on road slipperiness during winter precipitation events. Marie Eriksson and Sven Lindqvist

Paper presented at the 9th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Visegrád, Hungary,

ERS-ENVISAT CROSS-INTERFEROMETRY SIGNATURES OVER DESERTS. Urs Wegmüller, Maurizio Santoro and Christian Mätzler

We greatly appreciate the thoughtful comments from the reviewers. According to the reviewer s comments, we revised the original manuscript.

HYDROLOGICAL MODELING OF HIGHLY GLACIERIZED RIVER BASINS. Nina Omani, Raghavan Srinivasan, Patricia Smith, Raghupathy Karthikeyan, Gerald North

COUPLING A DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODEL TO REGIONAL CLIMATE MODEL OUTPUT: AN EVALUATION OF EXPERIMENTS FOR THE RHINE BASIN IN EUROPE

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

DAMAGE DETECTION OF THE 2008 SICHUAN, CHINA EARTHQUAKE FROM ALOS OPTICAL IMAGES

Scientific registration n : 2180 Symposium n : 35 Presentation : poster MULDERS M.A.

Snowcover along elevation gradients in the Upper Merced and Tuolumne River basin of the Sierra Nevada of California from MODIS and blended ground data

DEM GENERATION AND ANALYSIS ON RUGGED TERRAIN USING ENVISAT/ASAR ENVISAT/ASAR MULTI-ANGLE INSAR DATA

A distributed runoff model for flood prediction in ungauged basins

ANALYSIS OF ASAR POLARISATION SIGNATURES FROM URBAN AREAS (AO-434)

Ice Observations on the Churchill River using Satellite Imagery

INFLUENCE OF SNOW COVER RECESSION ON AN ALPINE ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM *)

Mapping the extent of temperature-sensitive snowcover and the relative frequency of warm winters in the western US

M. Niang 1, JP. Dedieu 2, Y. Durand 3, L. Mérindol 3, M. Bernier 1, M. Dumont 3. accurate radar measurements and simulated backscattering is proposed.

APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES

Prediction of Snow Water Equivalent in the Snake River Basin

VALIDATION RESULTS OF THE OPERATIONAL LSA-SAF SNOW COVER MAPPING

AEROSOL RETRIEVAL AND ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION FOR MERIS DATA OVER LAKES

Applications to Snow and Ice Practical Training

OPERATIONAL AVALANCHE ACTIVITY MONITORING USING RADAR SATELLITES: FROM NORWAY TO WORLDWIDE ASSISTANCE IN AVALANCHE FORECASTING

GLACIER AND SNOWMELT MODELLING USING SWAT: GANGA BASIN CASE STUDY. INRM Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Comparison of remote sensing derived glacier facies maps with distributed mass balance modelling at Engabreen, northern Norway

regime on Juncal Norte glacier, dry Andes of central Chile, using melt models of A study of the energy-balance and melt different complexity

Automatic mapping of snow cover depletion curves using optical remote sensing data under conditions of frequent cloud cover and temporary snow

Soil Erosion Calculation using Remote Sensing and GIS in Río Grande de Arecibo Watershed, Puerto Rico

MULTISENSOR AND MULTITEMPORAL SATELLITE DATA FOR RUNOFF FORECAST IN HIGH ALPINE ENVIRONMENT

Satellite-observed Snow Covered Area in the HBV-model

Data Fusion and Multi-Resolution Data

Remote Sensing of SWE in Canada

Snow property extraction based on polarimetry and differential SAR interferometry

Snow processes and their drivers in Sierra Nevada (Spain), and implications for modelling.

PRELIMINARY DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES

EFFICIENCY OF THE INTEGRATED RESERVOIR OPERATION FOR FLOOD CONTROL IN THE UPPER TONE RIVER OF JAPAN CONSIDERING SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF RAINFALL

Appendix A Calibration Memos

Snow Service Central Europe Operational Earth Observation NOAA-AVHRR + ENVISAT ASAR Maps of

GIS based Estimation of snow depth in mountainous Himalayan region: A case study

Advancing Remote-Sensing Methods for Monitoring Geophysical Parameters

USING GIS FOR AVALANCHE SUSCEPTIBILITY MAPPING IN RODNEI MOUNTAINS

Why modelling? Glacier mass balance modelling

The use of earth observation technology to improve the characterization of ice and snow

Supplementary Materials for

Transcription:

3UHSULQWRI3URFRI$'52)LQDO6\PSRVLXP2FW0RQWUHDO&DQDGD 6QRZPHOWPRGHOOLQJXVLQJ5DGDUVDWGDWD 7KRPDV1DJOHU+HOPXW5RWW*UDKDP*OHQGLQQLQJ,QVWLWXWI U0HWHRURORJLHXQG*HRSK\VLN8QLYHUVLWlW,QQVEUXFN,QQUDLQ$,QQVEUXFN$XVWULD 3KRQH )D[ (PDLOWKRPDVQDJOHU#XLENDFDW $EVWUDFW A procedure for mapping wet snow is described which is based on change detection to compensate for backscattering variations due to topography. The method requires repeat pass SAR images as provided by Radarsat. As test area the basin Tuxbach / Zillertal in the Austrian Alps was selected. Based on Radarsat SAR Beam Mode S7 images (look angle about 40 ) and -2 SAR images (look angle of 19 ) snow maps were generated. A comparison between Radarsat and Landsat TM snow maps show good agreement. The SAR derived snow maps were used as input for calculating daily runoff in the basin Tuxbach during the snow melt season 1998.,QWURGXFWLRQ Snow extent is a key parameter for snow melt runoff modelling and forecasting. For operational runoff forecasting the capability of SAR to provide regular repeat pass observations, irrespective of clouds, is a significant advantage. The capability for mapping melting snow has been demonstrated with the C-band SAR of the European Remote Sensing Satellite -1 (Nagler, 1996; Rott and Nagler, 1994), and with the C-band and X-band channels of SIR-C/X-SAR (Floricioiu, 1997; Rott et al. 1996), and with various airborne SAR systems (Rott and Davis,1993). The capabilities of SAR data for runoff modelling was demonstrated by Nagler and Rott (1997). These investigations were carried out in the test site Ötztal in the Austrian Alps south-west of Innsbruck. As contribution to the Adro Project 414 the application of the snow mapping algorithm developed by Nagler (1996) was tested with Radarsat data, acquired under a different look angle than, over the basin Tuxbach / Zillertal, Austrian Alps. The Radarsat SAR derived snow maps were compared with snow maps derived from Landsat TM images and locally with oblique photos to assess the accuracy. In order to investigate the application of Radarsat snow maps for hydrology and water management, simulations of daily runoff were carried out in the basin Tuxbach / Zillertal. 6$5%DVHG6QRZ0DSSLQJ3URFHGXUH The algorithm for mapping wet snow in mountain areas applies change detection in order to eliminate the effects of topography on backscattering. The low backscattering coefficient σ of melting snow in comparison to reference images is

the basis for the classification. Reference images are needed in the same imaging geometry (repeat pass) at dates when the site is free of snow or covered by dry snow (Nagler, 1996). Because of the low losses of the SAR signal in dry snow, the backscattering signal from the soil below the dry snowpack dominates in the X- to L-band range. On mountain slopes with rough surfaces the differences of σ between winter with dry snow and summer are very small (Floricioiu, 1997; Nagler, 1996). Therefore reduced σ in spring relatively to the reference images is a clear indication of snow melt. Over agricultural surfaces and wetlands other factors such as differences in surface roughness and wetness may also cause pronounced temporal changes of σ. Misclassifications for these areas can be excluded by means of land cover maps, topographic information or time sequence analysis. The main processing steps of the snow mapping procedure can be divided into three parts. The first part includes the generation of a geocoded ratio image using repeat pass images to map changes in backscattering. It includes Coarse matching of the snow (slave) image in full resolution to the reference (master) image, multilooking, and speckle filtering. We found that the Frost Filter is well suited for the snow mapping procedure, the filter size depends on the previously applied level of multi-looking. The ratio of the backscattering coefficient of the snow image (σ ws ) versus the backscattering coefficient of the reference image (σ ref ) is calculated, and the ratio image is geocoded using a digital elevation model and orbit parameters (Nagler and Rott, 1997). The second part of the procedure includes the generation of the binary snow map by thresholding the geocoded ratio image. For steep terrain it may be necessary to combine the geocoded ratio images of crossing orbits in order to reduce the loss of information due to layover, shadow and inappropriate incidence angles. This step is required for low look angle SAR such as Radarsat SAR Beam Mode S1 or SAR, if a significant part of the image is affected by foreshortening and layover. In images with high look angles (e.g. Radarsat Beam Mode S7) layover regions are of less concern, therefore this processing step may be omitted. The following rules are applied for combining crossing passes: 1. Exclude all pixels in layover and shadow regions and with local incidence angles θ<17 and θ>78 ; these pixels are included in the residual layover/shadow mask. 2. If a pixel is within the accepted range of incidence angles both in the image of the ascending and of the descending orbit, the pixel from the pass with the higher incidence angle is selected. Binary snow maps are generated by thresholding the ratio image. A pixel is classified as wet snow when the condition σ ws / σ ref < TR is valid. Based on signature studies (Nagler, 1996) and on field observations a threshold of TR = -3 db was determined for alpine regions. The third part includes post processing steps, which are required to generate snow maps (dry snow and wet snow) as input to hydrological models. We included

corrections for agricultural fields and for dry snow areas at higher elevations. For basins in a different environment the post processing steps have to be modified: Agricultural areas are located mainly in the lower areas of the alpine basins, and become snow free earlier in spring than the mountain slopes. These areas are flagged out and are assumed to be snow free after the snowline retreated to higher elevations. In mountainous regions melting is strongly influenced by topography. In general snow melt starts at lower altitudes while the snow remains dry at higher elevations. We defined the decision rule that surfaces above the upper boundary of wet snow areas are covered by dry snow and use archived snow maps to exclude snow free areas at higher elevations such as mountain ridges. For generation of snow maps we developed a software package in C and Fortran. It is linked with the commercially available software system EASI/PACE of PCI Inc. So for we used it to process Radarsat SGF and PRI products but it can be easily modified for other sensors. For automatic processing a shell script has been developed which handles the operation of the programs in the required order and aids in the selection of input parameters. It is especially designed for generating time series of snow maps for operational application with a minimum of user interaction. The automatic generation of a snow map for an area of 45 x 50 km 2 takes about 30 minutes on a SUN Ultra 2 and requires about 500 MB disk space. 7KH,QYHVWLJDWLRQ$UHD Figure 1 shows a Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper image of the drainage basin Tuxbach (130 km 2 ) in the Zillertaler Alpen, located north of the main ridge of the Eastern Alps of Austria. The basin extends from the runoff station Persal at an elevation of 880 m to the peak Olperer at 3476 m. The area is characterized by steep topography. Less than 2 % of the area are affected by minor slopes of less the 6, 77% have slopes between 16 and 40. A digital elevation model (DEM) with grid spacing of 25 m is available. It is used for geocoding of the SAR data and of the data from optical imagers and for delineating the basin boundaries. We carried out a classification of the main land cover types based on multitemporal Landsat TM data. 72 % of the basin are covered by low vegetation, which is made up by alpine meadows and dwarf shrubs at higher elevations, and by cultivated meadows in the valleys. Coniferous forests cover about 11% of the basin, the timberline is at 2100 m. At high elevations bare soil, rock and moraines are dominating, covering 14 % of the total basin, 3 % are covered by glaciers. 6$5GDWDDQDO\VLV Due to the steep topography the basin Tuxbach offers the possibility to investigate effects of SAR imaging geometry and to select the most appropriate look angle for snow mapping. We analyzed Radarsat SAR images acquired at standard beam

)LJXUH Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (band 5/4/3) Image of the basin Tuxbach / Zillertal from 15 September 1997. The boundaries of the drainage basin are shown; runoff gauge Persal (P), the meteorological station Schlegeis (S) and Mayrhofen (M), the peak Olperer (O). mode S7 (look angle 38 to 42 degrees) and -2 images (look angle between 17 to 23 degrees), with a similar imaging geometry as Radarsat SAR S1 data. A Radarsat SAR S7 (SGF-Product) image and -2 SAR (PRI-Product) image of the basin Tuxbach are shown in Figure 2, the corresponding geocoded images are shown in Figure 3. Due to the steep look angle foreshortening and layover are important in images of mountainous terrain, while areas covered by radar shadow can be neglected. The fraction of the test basin Tuxbach affected by layover in the ascending and descending pass of is 27.8 % and 34.9 % respectively, radar shadow covers less than 1 % of the basin. Outside of the layover and shadow regions about 4 % of the area are seen at very steep (lower than 17 ) or at grazing (higher than 78 ) local incidence angles. By combining ascending and descending passes the fraction of areas where no information can be extracted is reduced to 5 % of the basin. SAR observes the basin Tuxbach from ascending and descending passes within 12 hours time difference. In other latitudes, where the time difference of crossover can be several days, the combination of images from crossing passes may be affected by change of snow extent due to melting. In Radarsat SAR S7 images the amount of layover and radar shadow in the basin Tuxbach is less than 1% of the area. About 7 % and 9% are imaged at inappropriate local incidence angles from the ascending and descending orbit, respectively. This means that in this terrain a Radarsat SAR S7 image of one pass is sufficient to get information of more than 90% of the basin.

1DJOHU HW DO 6$5 VQRZ PDSSLQJ LQ PRXQWDLQ UHJLRQV The selection of a suitable reference image, with snow free surfaces or dry snow cover, is crucial for snow mapping by means of change detection. In 1998 eight Radarsat SAR images in Mode S7 were acquired over the basin Tuxbach, four images during descending passes on 4 February, 17 April, 11 May, 4 June at 6:15 MET and four images during the ascending pass on 6 February, 19 April, 13 May, 6 June at 18:15 MET. The images acquired on 4 February (descending pass) and 6 February 1998 (ascending pass) were selected as reference. It should be noted that due to the comparatively warm and sunny weather on 6 February the snow surface was slightly wet at south facing slopes and lower elevations in the afternoon. In these areas the change detection algorithm does not work correctly and the melting snow is missed. In the morning image of 4 February the snow surface was completely dry, therefore this image is the more appropriate reference image. Additionally, more than 20-2 images have been acquired over the test basin since 1996. To improve the representativity of the backscattering properties and to reduce the amount of speckle, an average reference image was derived as a mean of two repeat pass images. We used the images from 18 November 1997 and 27 January 1998, when the air temperature was low and the snow pack was completely dry. For both C-Band VV and Radarsat C-Band HH data we applied the same threshold of -3 db to discriminate between wet snow covered and snow free areas. )LJXUH Ascending Radarsat SAR Beam Mode S7 SGF image, 13 May 1998, and ascending -2 SAR PRI image, 6 July 1998, of the basin Tuxbach. Summit of Olperer (O), runoff gauge Persal (P), meteorological station Schlegeis (S).

)LJXUH Geocoded Radarsat SAR Mode S7 image, 13 May 1998, (left) and - 2 SAR image, 6 July1998, (right). Layover regions (red), radar shadow (green). The SAR based snow classifications were locally verified by oblique photos taken during field campaigns on the day of the image acquisition and by comparison with snow maps from other sources. Figure 4 compares the snow extent on 11 May 1998 derived from Radarsat Mode S7 SGF data (descending pass) and the snow map from Landsat-5 TM data of 13 May 1998. In order to avoid misclassification of dry snow, at higher elevations the snow extent of the SAR image from 4 June 1998 was used under the assumption that it was the same as the snow extent on 11 May. The Landsat-5 TM snow classification was based on the ratio of the planetary albedo R pl in TM band 3 and 5 corrected for the local illumination angle (Rott, 1994). A threshold of R pl (TM3) / R pl (TM5) = 4.3 was used to classify pixels which are fully snow covered (Rott and Markl, 1989). The general patterns of the snow maps from SAR and Landsat TM agree well. Looking in more detail, the Landsat TM snow map is less noisy. In dense forests snow can usually not be detected by means of remote sensing data, but at this date the snow line was higher than the timberline. The pixel by pixel comparison between Landsat TM and SAR classification of snow free and snow covered areas has an overall agreement of 82.8 % (Table 1). However, it should be noted that this comparison is affected by inaccuracies in the geocoding of Landsat TM and SAR images due to errors in the satellite orbits and in the DEM. In the test basin the co-registration accuracy of the images of the two sensors, derived for a few natural ground control points at various elevations, shows differences up to 4 pixels. On 11 May 1998 the total snow extent derived from Radarsat SAR is 46.4 km 2, the snow extent from Landsat-5 TM data, 13 May 1998, is 44.4 km 2, which corresponds to a retreat of the snow coverage of 2 km 2 within 2 days. This agrees

well with field observations, because significant snow melt was observed in these two days due to warm temperatures. The main differences are found near the snow line, where the snow cover is broken. In such areas SAR tends to underestimate the snow extent in comparison to Landsat TM, which confirms our conclusions from previous intercomparisons (Nagler, 1996, Nagler and Rott, 1998). For hydrological applications the total snow area and the fraction of snow cover in the various elevation zones is of main relevance. These quantities compare very well between the two sensors. )LJXUH Snow map from (a) Radarsat SAR data beam mode S7; light grey: change of snow extent between 11 May 1998 and 4 June 1998, dark grey: snow extent on 4 June 1998; and (b) from Landsat-5 TM data 13 May 1998; light grey: snow; black: no information (clouds in Landsat TM image; SAR: layover, radar shadow, and local incidence angles <17 and >78 ); white: snow free areas. 7DEOH Confusion matrix derived from Landsat-5 TM, 13 May 1998, and Radarsat SAR S7 snow map from 11 May 1998 for the basin Tuxbach/Zillertal. Radarsat - 11May98 Landsat TM 13May98 6QRZFRYHUHG 6QRZIUHH 6QRZFRYHUHG 76.4 % 23.6 % 6QRZIUHH 13.7 % 86.3 % Snow covered area: Overall Agreement: Radarsat, 11 May98 Landsat TM, 13 May98 82.8 % 46.4 km 2 44.4 km 2

5XQRII6LPXODWLRQ The daily stream flow in the basin was calculated using the Snowmelt Runoff Model (SRM) of Martinec and Rango (Rango, 1995). For hydrological modeling the test basin was divided into 7 elevation zones (zone boundaries at: 880, 1300, 1700, 2100, 2400, 2700, 3000, 3480 m), for which daily values of precipitation, temperature and fraction of snow covered area are required as model input. The runoff parameters for model calibration were determined from historical runoff data. Daily values of precipitation and temperature were measured at Schlegeis (1800 m) and Mayrhofen (670 m), which are located near the boundary of the basin (Figure 1). The values of the snow covered area are interpolated from the SAR based snow maps using the cumulative degree day model (Rott et al., 1998). Because fresh snow, falling during the main melting period, disappears within a few days, it does not make any significant contribution to the runoff. Therefore we used only images which were not affected by fresh snow falls. Figure 5 shows the time series of the three variables used in the runoff simulation. These variables are calculated separately for each elevation zone. )LJXUH Daily values of the snow covered area (SCA) in the basin Tuxbach / Zillertal derived from -2 and Radarsat SAR data, the mean zonal precipitation and the typical temperature at 1800 m based on daily measurements at the stations Schlegeis and Mayrhofen.

The runoff calculations for the basin Tuxbach were carried out for the period 1 January 1998 to 30 June 1998 (Figure 6). Until mid May the simulated runoff and the measured runoff agree comparatively well. The first melt peak in the simulation is somewhat overestimated due to a delay of snow melt runoff until the snow pack is saturated. Once the snow pack is saturated the correspondence between measured and calculated runoff is better. Differences between simulated and measured discharge are mainly observed in periods with high rainfall in June (Figure 5), which points out that the measurements of the precipitation gauges at Schlegeis and Mayrhofen poorly represent the precipitation in the basin. Over the whole period the Nash Sutcliffe coefficient of determination between simulated and measured runoff is R 2 =0.75, the volumetric difference is -5.69 %. 20 Simulated Runoff, Persal 1998 R2 = 0.752, vol. diff. = -5.69% 18 16 Measured Radarsat m3/s 14 12 10 Computed Radarsat 8 6 4 2 0 12.Jän 26.Jän 09.Feb 23.Feb 09.Mär 23.Mär 06.Apr 20.Apr 04.Mai 18.Mai 01.Jun 15.Jun 29.Jun )LJXUH Measured and simulated runoff for the basin Tuxbach in spring 1998. The arrows indicate the acquisition of SAR images used for the model calculation. 6XPPDU\DQG&RQFOXVLRQV An automatic snow mapping algorithm, based on change detection, was used to generate maps of melting snow from SAR data of the mountain basin Tuxbach in the Eastern Alps. Radarsat SAR Beam Mode S7 data, with a typical look angle of 40, and -2 SAR data, with mean look angle of 19, were used. Because of the comparatively high look angle, geocoded Radarsat SAR Mode S7 images (ascending or descending) provides useful information on more than 90 % of the basin Tuxbach, whereas for SAR only about 65% to 70% of the area can be classified. This makes the combination of crossing passes necessary to generate a single snow map, whereas the use of a single Radarsat SAR S7 image is sufficient. To discriminate between wet snow and snow free areas we applied the

same threshold of -3 db on the ratio image for Radarsat C-Band HH and -2 C- Band VV data. The Radarsat SAR snow map from 11 May 1998 agrees well with the Landsat TM snow classification from 13 May 1998. Based on the SAR derived snow maps simulations of the daily runoff were carried out for the basin Tuxbach in 1998. Simulation and measurements agree well during the melting period, confirming the usefulness of SAR derived snow maps for calculation of daily runoff. $FNQRZOHGJHPHQWV The Radarsat data were made available within the ADRO Project 414, the data by the European Space Agency for the Experiment AO2.A101. Part of the work has been carried out within the Project ENV4-CT96-0364 of European Union, DGXII. 5HIHUHQFHV Floricioiu D.M., 1997: Polarimetric Signatures and Classification of Alpine Terrain by Means of SIR-C/ X-SAR. PhD Thesis, Univ. Innsbruck, p. 184. Nagler T.,1996: Methods and Analysis of Synthetic Aperture Radar Data from -1 and X-SAR for Snow and Glacier Applications, PhD Thesis, Univ. Innsbruck, p. 183. Nagler T. and H. Rott,1997: The application of -1 SAR for snowmelt runoff modelling. Proc. IAHS Symposium S3, Rabat, IAHS. Publ. no. 242. Nagler T. and H. Rott,1998: SAR Tools for snow melt modelling in the project HydAlp, Proc. of IGARSS 98, Seattle 6-10 Jul 98, pp 1521-1523. Rango A., 1995: The Snowmelt Runoff Model. in Ed: V. P. Singh: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, p 1130. Rott H. and G. Markl, 1989: Improved Snow and Glacier Monitoring by the Landsat Thematic Mapper. Proc. of Workshop on "Earthnet Pilot Project on Landsat Thematic Mapper Appications", ESA SP1102. pp.3-12. Rott H. and B. Davis, 1993: Multifrequency and polarimetric SAR observations on alpine glaciers. Annals of Glaciology, 17, pp.98-104. Rott H., 1994: "Thematic studies in Alpine areas by means of polarimetric SAR and optical imagery". Adv. Space Res.14(3) 217-226. Rott H. and T. Nagler, 1994: Capabilities of -1 SAR for Snow and Glacier Monitoring in Alpine Areas, Proc. 2 nd -1 Symp. ESA SP-361, pp. 965-970. Rott, T. Nagler, and D.M. Floricioiu: Snow and Glacier Parameters derived from Single Channel and Multiparameter SAR. Proc. of Int. Symp. on Retrieval of Bio- and Geophysical Parameters from SAR Data for Land Applications. CNES, Toulouse, Oct. 1995, pp. 479-488. Rott H., N. Batlogg, and T. Nagler, 1998: Modellierung des Abflusses aus hochalpinen Einzugsgebieten unter Verwendung von Satellitendaten. Österr. Zeitschrift Vermess. und Geoinform., in press.