The Canadian Height Modernization Initiative. Information for British Columbia Stakeholders / Clients

Similar documents
Height Modernization 2013 A New Canadian Vertical Datum

4 Survey Datums. 4.1 Horizontal Datum Policy SURVEY DATUMS SEPTEMBER 2006

Geodesy. orientation. shape. gravity field

Modernization of National Geodetic Datum in China *

Frames for the Future New Datum Definitions for Modernization of the U.S. National Spatial Reference System

NGS and the Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System (NSRS)

Introduction. Elevation Data Strategy. Status and Next Steps

Georeferencing, Map Projections, Cartographic Concepts. -Coordinate Systems -Datum

2007 / 2008 GeoNOVA Secretariat Annual Report

The National Spatial Reference System of the Future

BUILDING AN ACCURATE GIS

Making Sense of Evolving Reference Frames for North America

Geospatial Policy Development and Institutional Arrangements *

Positioning the Pacific: NOAA s Geospatial Activities. Juliana Blackwell, Director NOAA s National Geodetic Survey March 6, 2012

Town of Chino Valley. Survey Control Network Report. mgfneerhg mc N. Willow Creek Road Prescott AZ

SIRGAS: Basis for Geosciences, Geodata, and Navigation in Latin America

HORIZONTAL PROJECTION PARAMETERS: DANE COUNTY COORDINATES

1/28/16. EGM101 Skills Toolbox. Oblate spheroid. The shape of the earth Co-ordinate systems Map projections. Geoid

Geographic Information Systems class # 1 February 19, Coordinate reference systems in GIS: geodetic coordinates

AGGREGATE RESOURCES OF ONTARIO (ARO) METADATA

NATRF 2022 AND LDP OCTOBER 11, 2017

From Global to National Geodetic Reference Frames: how are they connected and why are they needed?

2014 Russell County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update STAKEHOLDERS AND TECHNICAL ADVISORS MEETING 2/6/14

Shape of the Earth. Data Output by the Receiver

The GIS Path Forward Saskatchewan s Geomatics Strategic Plan

International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics. Resolutions

Measuring ecosystems and biodiversity and related goods and services

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS Session 8

Final Report. Nova Scotia Coordinate Referencing System (NSCRS) Future Policy Strategy. November 17, 2011

Aboriginal communities strengthen governance with location-based tools in the 21st century

Efficiencies in Data Acquisition and Transformation

VT State Plane. Daniel J. Martin National Geodetic Survey VT Geodetic Advisor. VSLS Conference Rutland VT April 11, 2008

Geodetic Observing Systems: tools in observing the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute

Vertical Reference Frame Pacific

What are the social, technical, environmental and economic benefits and opportunities of accessing and sharing geodetic data?

Georeferencing. Place names Postal addresses Postal codes Coordinate systems (lat/long, UTM, etc.)

NEEA Refresh aka 3D Nation Requirements and Benefits Study. Allyson Jason, Carol Ostergren, Xan Fredericks and Lou Driber November 9, 2017

The 3-D Global Spatial Data Model: Geometrical Foundation of the Global Spatial Data Infrastructure

GEOID UNDULATIONS OF SUDAN USING ORTHOMETRIC HEIGHTS COMPARED WITH THE EGM96 ANG EGM2008

Fusion of Geodesy and GIS at NOAA s National Geodetic Survey

Geospatial Data Standards Considerations for the delivery of 2D and 3D spatial data February 2019

Observation (EO) & Geomatics in Canada

REGIONAL SDI DEVELOPMENT

Report of PCGIAP to the 18 th United Nations Regional Cartographic Conference for Asia and the Pacific (UNRCC-AP) for the period

SURVEYING AND MAPPING, INC. COORDINATE DATA SHEET JOB: CITY OF DECATUR CLIENT: CITY OF DECATUR SAM JOB#:

MARINE GEODESY. by James C. T i s o n, J r. Director, U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey

Faatasi Malologa (PGSC Chair) Director Department of Lands & Survey, Tuvalu

UNITED NATIONS E/CONF.97/6/IP. 33

Fundamentals of Surveying (LE/ESSE )

MSGIC Spring Mtg Denton April 23, 2014

Height systems. Rudi Gens Alaska Satellite Facility

A Strategic Plan for Geodesy in Sweden. Mikael Lilje Lars E. Engberg Geodesy Department Lantmäteriet Sweden

This week s topics. Week 6. FE 257. GIS and Forest Engineering Applications. Week 6

How significant is the dynamic component of the North American vertical datum?

Update to the Association of Ontario Land Surveyors February 27, 2015 Deerhurst, Ontario

2 nd Tidal and Water Level Working Group Meeting

Using PRISM Climate Grids and GIS for Extreme Precipitation Mapping

Next Generation Australian Datum. Permanent Committee on Geodesy, ICSM

Presentation to Association of British Columbia Land Surveyors AGM on Base Mapping in British Columbia. February 9, 2006 Victoria

Shetland Islands Council

What is a Map Projection?

Fundamentals of Surveying (LE/ESSE ) Lecture 10

Updating and Re-establishment of Cadastral Control Points in Korea by Using GPS Observations

MODERNIZATION OF THE NSRS

HEIGHT SYSTEM MODERNIZATION AND GEOID MODELLING STUDIES IN TURKEY

The general procedure for estimating 24-hour PMP includes the following steps:

Height systems. Rüdiger Gens

MALDIVES. Regional Expert Workshop On Land Accounting For SDG Monitoring & Reporting (25-27 th Sept 2017) - Fathimath Shanna, Aishath Aniya -

What s Up? Tidal and Vertical Datums. Noel Zinn Hydrometronics LLC July 2011, revised November 2013

MRD 228 METADATA. Official Name of the Data Set or Information Holding: Physiography of Southern Ontario

Geog Lecture 29 Mapping and GIS Continued

What is Geodesy? Types of Geodesy terrestrial or classical geodesy space geodesy theoretical geodesy

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

NR402 GIS Applications in Natural Resources Lesson 4 Map Projections

GIS (GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS) AS A FACILITATION TOOL FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA

Geospatial natural disaster management

Exploring the boundaries of your built and natural world. Geomatics

Country Report On Sdi Activities In Singapore ( )

Modernization of the National Spatial Reference System 2022 Datum. Jacksonville Chapter July 2018

Shape e o f f the e Earth

Georeferencing. Geography is the key to linking attributes. Georeferencing is the key to geography.

Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Geographic Information System (GIS) Strategy An Overview of the Strategy Implementation Plan November 2009

Large Scale Mapping Policy for the Province of Nova Scotia

GEOMATICS SURVEYING AND MAPPING EXPERTS FOR OVER 35 YEARS

Standards in Action: The Canadian Geospatial Data Infrastructure (CGDI)

BIG IDEAS. Area of Learning: SOCIAL STUDIES Urban Studies Grade 12. Learning Standards. Curricular Competencies

GRAV-D. Gravity for the Re-definition of the American Vertical Datum

You might know your position precisely but do you know where you are?

Brazil Paper for the. Second Preparatory Meeting of the Proposed United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geographic Information Management

Statement. H.E Dr. Richard Nduhuura Permanent Representative of the Republic of Uganda to the United Nations New York

GEOGRAPHIC COORDINATE SYSTEMS

Statewide Topographic Mapping Program

GEOIDS FAQ. November

The Integration of Land and Marine Spatial Data Set As Part of Indonesian Spatial Data Infrastructure Development

Upgrade the Datasets in NSDI for Smarter Services with the Cases of China

Kansas Next Generation 911 Data Remediation Program. Esri Imagery Forum June 26, 2016

GIS Geographical Information Systems. GIS Management

LEADS. The Essential Elements of a 3-D Geographic Coordinate

Geological Survey of Canada Lands and Minerals Sector Natural Resources Canada OneGeology, June 2018

Projections & GIS Data Collection: An Overview

Transcription:

The Canadian Height Modernization Initiative Information for British Columbia Stakeholders / Clients Introduction A modern society requires the ability to measure elevations relative to mean sea level easily, accurately, and at the lowest possible cost. Applications range from engineering surveys to monitoring sea level rise; from navigation and mapping to the use of remote sensing for resource management; from mineral exploration to assessment of potential flooding areas; from the construction and precise positioning of dams and pipelines to the interpretation of seismic disturbances. The height reference system is also implicated in many legal documents related to land management and safety such as easement, flood control, and boundary demarcation. All of these applications depend on the universal compatibility of a common coordinate reference system through which geo-referenced information can be interrelated and exploited reliably. The current system of elevations in Canada, the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1928 (CGVD28), was established using a classical spirit levelling technique. It has numerous limitations, such as prohibitively high maintenance costs, limited geographic coverage, difficulty integrating it with the Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS), and incompatibility with modern space-based technologies. An opportunity exists to define a new datum based on the latest space-based technologies - one that is compatible with the latest international standards and enables cost-saving implementation of technologies such as GPS. This information paper describes the problems with the current vertical datum, the Canadian Height Modernization initiative, the proposed steps for the initiative and the work currently underway by the Province of BC (through the Federal-Provincial/Territorial Canadian Council on Geomatics and its Canadian Geodetic Reference System sub-committee). The Problem (Background) The current height reference system is based on the Canadian Geodetic Vertical Datum (CGVD28), adopted in 1935, which was constructed using classical surveying techniques. The datum reference level was defined as mean sea-level determined from data collected at five tide gauges on the east and west coasts. The datum is accessed by users through an extensive network of precisely levelled benchmarks provided by government agencies. Historically, the definition of this height reference system has been separate from the definition of the horizontal reference system, but with the implementation of the Canadian Spatial Reference System, this is changing. A number of limitations (described below) are associated with the continued use of CGVD28 including the cost of maintenance, coverage in remote areas, compatibility with the Canadian horizontal reference system and the height reference systems in other jurisdictions, accuracy and distortions in the system, and compatibility with modern space-based positioning technology. Degradation and Maintenance Maintenance of the benchmarks and related levelling lines required for the current reference system remains labour-intensive and very costly, but the resources available to maintain the networks have been declining. Until 1993, the Geodetic Survey Division (GSD) of Natural Resources Canada carried out an average of 4,000 to 5,000 km of levelling annually. Approximately 65% (~3,000 Km) of the levelling was for maintenance purposes, the other 35% (~1,500km) was related to network expansion. From 1994 to Canadian Height Modernization Page 1

2000, GSD performed an average of 1,200 km of levelling annually. GSD has performed only minimal levelling since 2001. In BC, the densification of the vertical networks is concentrated in urban areas where an estimated 2000km of 1 st -order and 10,000 km of 2 nd - / 3 rd -order levelling networks have been established - there are over 25,000 municipal geodetic control monuments within BC that are part of the standardized Municipal Geo- Spatial Reference System (MGSR) layer within the provincial survey control system. The provincial survey control is housed in a database called MASCOT and accessible to all clients and users via the Web. In addition to this, many other agencies within the province may have levelling networks that are have been extended from the Federal / Provincial survey control and which are not part of the MASCOT database (e.g. road/highway surveys, water-related surveys, floodplain surveys, etc.). The current height reference system is accessible only in areas near existing levelling lines. The network does not extend to the North or unpopulated regions, and its expansion to remote areas is prohibitively expensive and technically challenging. Assuming the primary vertical network were to be maintained on a 25-year cycle, approximately 5,600 km of levelling would be required annually. Since this level of maintenance is not being performed, the network is deteriorating. The degradation rate of the network across Canada is estimated to be in the range of 15% to 20% of the benchmarks per 20 years. In urban or near-urban areas the degradation rate could reach 35% for the same period. Accuracy and Distortions The current height system is a construct of annual survey observations that date back to 1904. Despite great care to minimize potential errors, the network was established piece-meal, with data adjusted locally. This resulted in significant regional distortions in published heights that are, over time, further exacerbated by crustal motion (of the earth s tectonic plates). Comparisons of these heights against the most recent geoid model indicate regional distortions of up to one metre in the primary vertical network. Further, due to the sometimes poor extension of the primary vertical network into project or local areas, the distortions in these areas may be significantly higher (i.e. upto several metres). While the consistency of heights within a localized area (i.e. relative height differences)will likely be sufficiently precise, the application of new technology, such as GPS, is impeded by the inability to obtain heights consistent with the current datum. As an extension of the latter difficulty, the current published heights are also based on a datum that assumed the Pacific and Atlantic oceans were at the same height. In fact, the water level at Vancouver could be higher than the water level at Halifax by 40 to 70 cm. This discrepancy causes a national-scale tilt in the published heights that has significant impacts on different scientific applications such as climate change studies and sea-level rise determination. There is also a discontinuity in the height system between the datum used in the United States, North American Vertical Datum 1988 (NAVD88), and CGVD28. This has created confusion for cross-border activities (e.g. hydroelectric initiatives/projects related to the Columbia Rover Treaty, floodplains, etc.). However, implementation of NAVD88 in Canada is not considered a viable option that meets today s user requirements. Subsidence or uplift of individual benchmarks due to frost or other local instability is another weakness of the network, significantly affecting its accuracy (or equivalently, confidence in that accuracy) at a local level. Inconsistencies in the levelling network are expected to increase as maintenance decreases. Compatibility with the Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS) The Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS) provides fundamental reference values for latitude, longitude, height and gravity, including earth s orientation parameters and rotation rate in space, as the foundation for the nation s evolving positioning and navigation activities. The resulting reference frames, Canadian Height Modernization Page 2

propagated through provincial and municipal reference networks and other government services, serve as standards that ensure the compatibility of Canadian geo-referenced information on earth and in space regardless of their source or date. The current vertical datum is not well integrated within the CSRS and therefore extra effort is required to translate GPS information into CGVD28 elevations. The horizontal and ellipsoidal height components of CSRS have been realized through the NAD83 initiative, but the CSRS reference system cannot be fully realized without the modernization of the vertical datum. GPS users require 3D positions referenced to the Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS) to ensure compatibility with data from other sources and to meet regulatory requirements. Therefore, the modernization of the vertical component of the CSRS is critical to providing Canadians with a truly threedimensional integrated datum. The Canadian Height Modernization Initiative An opportunity exists to define a new datum that resolves the limitations of the current system one that is compatible with international standards, enables cost-saving implementation of space-based technologies such as GPS, is easily accessible at any point in Canada, and is less sensitive to geodynamic activities and the deterioration of benchmarks. Such a system would be based on an accurate geoid model. Implementation The adoption of a new vertical datum for Canada could be as early as 2009 (this does not mean that it would be adopted by all provincial users at that time). Publication of a new geoid model is currently planned for 2007 to take advantage of the most recent data from satellite gravity missions. An additional two years will be required to confirm the adequacy of this geoid model as the basis for the new datum, to finalize the development of tools to help users make the transition, and to adjust the heights of existing benchmarks to the new geoid-based datum. The new datum will result in changes in benchmark elevations across Canada. The heights assigned to these points will be of the highest accuracy achievable when the datum is revised, and will remain at these values for many years (several decades) except for changes due to benchmark motion or geodynamics. The new primary vertical benchmark heights will differ from the current published heights by less than one metre at any single point in Canada, but by more than 10 cm at most locations (Figure 1). However, due to distortions in the secondary or densifyied vertical networks in each province, there will be larger differences regionally. In B.C. this may amount to a few metres to several metres in remote areas. Assuming that the heights in the Toronto area remain essentially fixed, the new heights would be approximately 5 cm lower in Montreal, 55 cm higher in Vancouver, and 30 cm lower in Halifax. However, the heights differences locally would remain with the same precision of a few cm or better (depending on the quality of the existing local surveys). Canadian Height Modernization Page 3

Figure 1: Differences in Heights of CGVD28 Compared to a Geoid Datum Use The new datum will be accessible directly through space-based positioning tools (e.g. GPS), as well as through monument networks including the federal and provincial Active Control Points (ACP), the Canadian Base Network (CBN), and the provincial High Precision Network (HPN). Both traditional and space-based techniques would coexist throughout a period of transition. Since the new datum will be defined as a virtual surface (geoid) covering the entire area of Canada, all points will have access to accurate heights, unlike the current datum that is strictly defined at benchmarks only. Geoid models can be made available in the field to allow instantaneous determination of latitude, longitude, ellipsoidal height and orthometric height within the Canadian Spatial Reference System (CSRS), land or sea. Transition to Modern Vertical Datum In order to ease transition to the new system, a number of steps will be taken: Support tools will be provided to facilitate adoption among the user communities. Information, tools, and data enabling height determination with respect to the new datum will be disseminated. A set of transformation parameters (e.g. grid shift file) and corresponding software tools to support the conversion of existing data sets referenced to CGVD28 will be made available. Information on the heights of existing federal and provincial benchmarks using the new datum will be disseminated. The existing infrastructure of benchmarks will be incorporated into the new system in order to minimize disruption to stakeholders and maximize access to the new datum. The CGVD28 datum will continue to co-exist with the new datum as long as it will be required. It should be noted, however, that the current network has its limitations and the revision in benchmark heights will not account for, or correct for, poorly established benchmark heights as originally surveyed, Canadian Height Modernization Page 4

benchmarks that have moved over the years, nor for changes in the Earth s crust (uplift/subsidence) that affect the accuracy of individual bench marks. The gradual deterioration of the existing network of ground benchmarks is expected to correspond to a reduction in its use as space-based positioning tools are increasingly adopted. In the event that damage to the physical network occurs at a rate unacceptable for a successful transition, additional maintenance may be performed. The following is the timeline to date and projected future timelines for the modernization of the Canadian height reference system: 1993 The United States adopt the new North American Vertical Datum of 1988. 1994 Federal government (NRCan s Geodetic Survey Division) announced their intention to move to space-based technology for maintenance and delivery of the CSRS. Physical maintenance of the vertical control network decreased. 1999 - A position paper on the Canadian Vertical Datum was tabled where the concept of a gravity-based datum was introduced. 2006 Conduct initial Canadian Height Modernization Study with goal of implementation plan. Further studies and outreach is conducted within provincial jurisdictions. 2007 Anticipated federal publication of a new geoid model for North America. 2008 - Anticipated availability of a new a vertical datum and tools to support the transition. 2009 - Anticipated federal adoption of new vertical datum. 2009 to 2020/30 Anticipated provincial adoption of the new vertical datum and transition period (10 to 20 years). International Compatibility A number of countries have made, or are in the process of making, the transition to a modernized height reference system. The US National Geodetic Survey (NGS) and Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) cooperated in the development of the North American Vertical Datum (NAVD88). Although the US adopted NAVD88 as its datum in 1993, Canada declined to do so as a result of unexplained discrepancies of about 1.5 m between the east and west coasts (likely due to the accumulation of systematic errors in the original levelling surveys) and the slight improvement overall that such a datum would bring. Today, a readjustment of the Canadian levelling network in a manner similar to the NAVD88 project would only be a temporary solution, albeit more accurate than CGVD28, and would not solve the problem of its limited coverage and cost of maintenance. Rather, a geoid-based height system has the best potential to harmonize with the United States and other nations in the long-term. Continued cooperation with U.S. agencies will be necessary to ensure continental and international compatibility. A means to transform measurements between CGVD28, NAVD88, and a new datum will be developed (Figure 2). Canadian Height Modernization Page 5

Figure 2: Differences in Heights of U.S. NAVD88 Compared to a Geoid Datum For more information on the Canadian Height Modernization Program, please visit: www.geod.nrcan.gc.ca/hm/index_e.php What is the Province Seeking? BMGS is a member of the Canadian Geodetic Reference System Committee (CGRSC) - a Federal - Provincial working committee of the Canadian Council on Geomatics (CCOG). The CGRSC was tasked to plan and coordinate maintenance and improvement of the Geodetic Reference System in Canada. Although the CGRSC is well aware of the technical issues related to the modernization of the vertical reference system, there are a number of practical issues that need to be taken into consideration in the development of an implementation plan. A key concern is that stakeholders be consulted to ensure the envisioned modernization and related transition are conducted in a manner that minimizes negative impacts to business and users, while maximizes benefits to all concerned. As a result, the CGRSC is preparing a high level implementation plan for a modernized Canadian Height Reference System. Their study is currently well underway and will: Consult with a few stakeholders in the federal, provincial and municipal governments, academia, and industry, Raise some awareness of the proposed changes, Determine user requirements for assistance in making the transition, Identify the socio-economic impacts, Identify the legal implications, Identify risks and impediments and make recommendations for their mitigation, Canadian Height Modernization Page 6

Prepare a plan for the implementation of the new system. The first part of this work has been completed namely the stakeholder consultation process. This was done via interviews with approximately fifty stakeholders across Canada ranging from industry representatives, to national agencies, to local municipal governments. Given the limited reach of that overall cross-country consultation, given the need to plan British Columbia s response and work ahead, including the need to prepare clients, stakeholders and users in British Columbia appropriately, over the next few months BMGS is canvassing provincial stakeholders/clients. Some of the questions that we wish to explore are: 1. What are the applications and activities within your organization that are dependent on height information, and in particular the Canadian Height Reference System? 2. What will be the impacts on your organization (and its clients) of benchmark height changes of up to one meter (urban) or more (rural/remote), given that relative local heights will not change significantly? 3. What, if any, will be the legal implications on data holdings in your jurisdiction (such as legal licences and encumbrances based on heights of land) of changing the vertical datum? 4. What will be the short and long-term impacts on your organization of not maintaining a levelling-based Canadian datum assuming that most federal/provincial benchmarks will not be replaced when they are destroyed? 5. What is the accuracy required in the applications and activities undertaken by your organization? Accuracy should be addressed both in absolute and relative terms. 6. Within your organization what will be the international cross-border datum difference implications? 7. What will be the advantages and disadvantages to your organization (and its clients) of adopting a national geoid model as a vertical datum? In particular, what will be the cost implications and how best might you prepare? 8. What might be the requirements within your organization for the transition to the modernized height system in terms of scientific tools, software applications, communications, and training? 9. What will be the risks and impediments for the modernization of the height system, and possible approaches to mitigation? 10. Are there any other comments you would like to make? For further information on the Canadian Height Modernization initiative please contact: Brad Hlasny, P.Eng. Manager Geo-Spatial Reference Section Base Mapping & Geomatic Services Integrated Land Management Bureau Tel. (250) 356-0969 Fax (250)356-7831 Brad.Hlasny@gov.bc.ca Canadian Height Modernization Page 7