CPT: Geopractica Contracting (Pty) Ltd Total depth: m, Date:

Similar documents
Friction (kpa) Cross correlation between qc qc & & fs fs

CPT Data Interpretation Theory Manual

Cone Penetration Test (CPT) Interpretation

CPT: _CPTU1. GEOTEA S.R.L. Via della Tecnica 57/A San Lazzaro di Savena (BO)

Soil Behaviour Type from the CPT: an update

Jose Brito, Cenor, Portugal

Cone Penetration Testing in Geotechnical Practice

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Introduction to Cone Penetration Testing

Evaluation of soil liquefaction using the CPT Part 2

Minnesota Department of Transportation Geotechnical Section Cone Penetration Test Index Sheet 1.0 (CPT 1.0)

Cone Penetration Test Design Guide for State Geotechnical Engineers

Chapter (11) Pile Foundations

CPT Applications - Liquefaction 2

USE OF CPT/CPTU FOR SOLUTION OF

CPT Guide 5 th Edition. CPT Applications - Deep Foundations. Gregg Drilling & Testing, Inc. Dr. Peter K. Robertson Webinar # /2/2013

CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA

Interpretation of Flow Parameters from In-Situ Tests (P.W. Mayne, November 2001)

Examples of CPTU results in other soil types. Peat Silt/ clayey sands Mine tailings Underconsolidated clay Other

Canadian Geotechnical Journal. CPT-based Soil Behaviour Type (SBT) Classification System an update

Monotonic and dilatory excess pore water dissipations in silt following CPTU at variable penetration rate

Chapter 12 Subsurface Exploration

Engineering Units. Multiples Micro ( ) = 10-6 Milli (m) = 10-3 Kilo (k) = Mega (M) = 10 +6

The CPT in unsaturated soils

Table 3. Empirical Coefficients for BS 8002 equation. A (degrees) Rounded Sub-angular. 2 Angular. B (degrees) Uniform Moderate grading.

8.1. What is meant by the shear strength of soils? Solution 8.1 Shear strength of a soil is its internal resistance to shearing stresses.

Geotechnical Properties of Sediments by In Situ Tests

Interpretation of in-situ tests some insights

ISC 5 SELF-BORING PRESSUREMETER TESTS AT THE NATIONAL FIELD TESTING FACILITY, BALLINA 5 9 SEPT 2016

PROBABILISTIC APPROACH TO DETERMINING SOIL PARAMETERS

Enhanced In-Situ Testing for Geotechnical Site Characterization. Graduate Course CEE 6423

GUIDE TO CONE PENETRATION TESTING

The San Jacinto Monument Case History

CPTu in Consolidating Soils PAULUS P. RAHARDJO. PROFESSOR OF GEOTECNICAL ENGINEERING, UNIVERSITAS KATOLIK PARAHYANGAN - INDONESIA

Engineeringmanuals. Part2

Vibroflotation Control of Sandy Soils using DMT and CPTU

Soil type identification and fines content estimation using the Screw Driving Sounding (SDS) data

APPENDIX F CORRELATION EQUATIONS. F 1 In-Situ Tests

ScienceDirect. Correlations between cone penetration test and seismic dilatometer Marchetti test with common laboratory investigations

Axially Loaded Piles

Master Thesis, Department of Geosciences. Interpretation of CPTu results in silty clay and assessment of strength parameters

Theory of Shear Strength

Evaluation of soil liquefaction using the CPT Part 1

Assessing effects of Liquefaction. Peter K. Robertson 2016

IGC. 50 th INDIAN GEOTECHNICAL CONFERENCE ESTIMATION OF FINES CONTENT FROM CPT PARAMETERS FOR CALCAREOUS SOILS OF WESTERN INDIAN OFFSHORE

Theory of Shear Strength

Conventional Field Testing & Issues (SPT, CPT, DCPT, Geophysical methods)

Ohio Department of Transportation. Development of CPT Driven Pile Direct Design Methodology for ODOT

Interpretation of the CPT in engineering practice

Interpretation of SCPTu Data in Stiff Soils and Soft Rock

Set-up in Heavy Tamping Compaction of Sands

Advanced model for soft soils. Modified Cam-Clay (MCC)

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER TITLE PAGE TITLE PAGE DECLARATION DEDIDATION ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK

Boreholes. Implementation. Boring. Boreholes may be excavated by one of these methods: 1. Auger Boring 2. Wash Boring 3.

Station Description Sheet GRA


WORKSHOP ON PENETRATION TESTING AND OTHER GEOMECHANICAL ISSUES Pisa 14 June 2016 ROOM F8 CPTU IN UNUSUAL SOILS

Use of CPT for design, monitoring, and performance verification of compaction projects

SOME GEOTECHNICAL PROPERTIES OF KLANG CLAY

A NEW MODEL LINKING SOIL STRUCTURE TO STRENGTH

The Hardening Soil model with small strian stiffness

SHEAR STRENGTH OF SOIL

Correlating the Shear Wave Velocity with the Cone Penetration Test

From - To 0,00-4,90 4,90-6,40 6,40-8,60 8,60-9,60 9,60-10,50 10,50-12,00 12,00-14,80 14,80-15,80 15,80-19,30 19, ,00

Calibrating CPT relative density and strength correlations for a laboratory fine sand

Geotechnical characterization of a heterogeneous unsuitable stockpile

Geotechnical Parameters of Alluvial Soils from in-situ Tests

Strength-Flow Parameters of Loose Silty Sands From Piezocone Tests

ASSESSMENT OF SHEAR STRENGTH IN SILTY SOILS

Chapter (5) Allowable Bearing Capacity and Settlement

Modified Dry Mixing (MDM) a new possibility in Deep Mixing

5th International Workshop "CPTU and DMT in soft clays and organic soils" Poznan, Poland, Sept , 2014

GEOTECHNICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION

Early Applications of DMT in Dubai in Two Main Projects for Natural and Artificial Earthfill Silty Sand

Importance of CPT in development of offshore windfarms

Suitability of the SDMT method to assess geotechnical parameters of post-flotation sediments.

Performance based earthquake design using the CPT

Shear Strength of Soils

VIRTUAL LAB. Z Soil.PC report revised by R.F. Obrzud, A. Truty and K. Podleś. with contribution by S. Commend and Th.

LIQUEFACTION RESISTANCE OF SILTYSAND BASED ON LABORATORY UNDISTURBED SAMPLE AND CPT RESULTS

SOIL MECHANICS AND APPLIED FOUNDATION ENGINEERING FUNDAMENTAL FACTS OF SOIL BEHAVIOR

Field measurement of shear wave velocity of soils

Shear Strength of Soil

Mechanical Wave Measurements. Electromagnetic Wave Techniques. Geophysical Methods GEOPHYSICAL SITE CHARACTERIZATION. Mechanical Wave Geophysics

The Bearing Capacity of Soils. Dr Omar Al Hattamleh

Soil and Rock Strength. Chapter 8 Shear Strength. Steel Strength. Concrete Strength. Dr. Talat Bader May Steel. Concrete.

A presentation of UniPile software for calculation of Capacity, Drag Force, Downdrag, and Settlement for Piles and Piled Foundations

Chapter 7: Settlement of Shallow Foundations

O-CELL RESPONSE USING ELASTIC PILE AND SEISMIC PIEZOCONE TESTS

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING Volume 1, No 4, 2011

Use of the Light Falling Weight Deflectometer (LFWD) as a site investigation tool for residual soils and weak rock

Constitutive Model Input Parameters for Numerical Analyses of Geotechnical Problems: An In-Situ Testing Case Study.

HKIE-GD Workshop on Foundation Engineering 7 May Shallow Foundations. Dr Limin Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

Estimation of Shear Wave Velocity Using Correlations

Ch 5 Strength and Stiffness of Sands

PILE LOAD TEST IN OLD ALLUVIUM

Prediction Model for Skin Friction and Tip Bearing Capacity of Bored Piles by FEM

Evaluating effective stress parameters and undrained shear strength of soft-firm clays from CPT and DMT

Liquefaction potential of Rotorua soils

H.1 SUMMARY OF SUBSURFACE STRATIGRAPHY AND MATERIAL PROPERTIES (DATA PACKAGE)

Transcription:

The plot below presents the cross correlation coeficient between the raw qc and fs values (as measured on the field). X axes presents the lag distance (one lag is the distance between two sucessive CPT measurements). CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:05 PM 1

SBT - Bq plots SBT legend CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:05 PM 1. Sensitive fine grained 4. Clayey silt to silty clay 7. Gravely sand to sand 2. Organic material 5. Silty sand to sandy silt 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 3. Clay to silty clay 6. Clean sand to silty sand 9. Very stiff fine grained 2

SBT - Bq plots (normalized) SBTn legend CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:05 PM 1. Sensitive fine grained 4. Clayey silt to silty clay 7. Gravely sand to sand 2. Organic material 5. Silty sand to sandy silt 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 3. Clay to silty clay 6. Clean sand to silty sand 9. Very stiff fine grained 3

Bq plots (Schneider) CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:05 PM 4

CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:05 PM 5

SBT legend CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:06 PM 1. Sensitive fine grained 4. Clayey silt to silty clay 7. Gravely sand to sand 2. Organic material 5. Silty sand to sandy silt 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 3. Clay to silty clay 6. Clean sand to silty sand 9. Very stiff fine grained 6

SBTn legend CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:06 PM 1. Sensitive fine grained 4. Clayey silt to silty clay 7. Gravely sand to sand 2. Organic material 5. Silty sand to sandy silt 8. Very stiff sand to clayey sand 3. Clay to silty clay 6. Clean sand to silty sand 9. Very stiff fine grained 7

Calculation parameters Phi: Based on Kulhawy & Mayne (1990) User defined estimation data CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:06 PM 8

Calculation parameters User defined estimation data CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:06 PM 9

Calculation parameters User defined estimation data CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:06 PM 10

Bearing Capacity calculation is perfromed based on the formula: :: Tabular results :: No B (m) Start Depth (m) End Depth (m) Soil Press. (kpa) Ult. bearing cap. (kpa) 1 1.00 2.00 4.45 2 1.20 2.30 3.80 898.54 770.14 3 1.40 2.60 3.35 680.35 4 1.60 5 1.80 2.90 2.98 606.30 3.20 2.71 550.67 6 2.00 7 2.20 3.50 2.76 561.35 3.80 2.56 521.74 8 9 2.40 4.10 2.39 488.19 2.60 4.40 2.27 464.26 10 2.80 4.70 2.15 439.12 11 3.00 5.00 2.04 417.74 12 3.20 5.30 1.95 398.97 13 3.40 5.60 1.86 381.83 14 3.60 5.90 1.79 367.11 15 3.80 6.20 1.72 353.32 16 4.00 6.50 1.66 341.11 CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:07 PM 11

This software is licensed to: Geopractica Presented below is a list of formulas used for the estimation of various soil properties. The formulas are presented in SI unit system and assume that all components are expressed in the same units. :: Unit Weight, g (kn/m³) :: :: Small strain shear Modulus, Go (MPa) :: :: Shear Wave Velocity, Vs (m/s) :: :: Permeability, k (m/s) :: :: Undrained peak shear strength, Su (kpa) :: :: Remolded undrained shear strength, Su(rem) (kpa) :: :: Young's Modulus, Es (MPa) :: :: Overconsolidation Ratio, OCR :: :: Relative Density, Dr (%) :: :: State Parameter, ψ :: :: In situ Stress Ratio, Ko :: :: Peak drained friction angle, φ ( ) :: :: 1-D constrained modulus, M (MPa) :: References Robertson, P.K., Interpretation of Cone Penetration Tests - a unified approach., Can. Geotech. J. 46(11): 1337 1355 (2009) CPeT-IT v.1.7.6.42 - CPTU data presentation & interpretation software - Report created on: 2015-08-17, 06:23:07 PM 12