On-Site Soils Investigation. Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA. February 28 th, 2012

Similar documents
Soil Surveys. What are the most important properties to consider in a taxonomic system used for making a soil survey?

Geology and New England Landscapes

Maggie Payne Jim Turenne

Parent Materials. & some of Seattle s soils

Jim Turenne. Soils on Social Media

Custom Soil Resource Report for Forrest County, Mississippi

TEXTURE ANALYSIS. Unknown 1 Unknown 2. Unknown 3 6O 6O O Z 14X 10Z X X 8Z

Soils of Rhode Island

Soils of the GLBRC Marginal Land Experiment (MLE) Sites

Standards and Procedures for Site Specific Soil Mapping in Rhode Island. Pg 1

Soil Map Boulder County Area, Colorado (Planet Blue Grass) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

Lowest and Youngest Terrace : Soil Pit #4

Soil Map Polk County, Florida

12- TOL MLRA Soil Survey Area Approximately 15,000,000 Acres

Monitoring and modelling hydrological fluxes in support of nutrient cycling studies in Amazonian rain forest ecosystems Tobon-Marin, C.

HEBER D. LESSIG U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Box 248, Lisbon, Ohio


MINERALOGICAL ALTERATIONS OF SOIL IRRIGATED WITH ACIDIC MINE WATER IN THE ALAMOSA RIVER BASIN

Introduction to Soil Science and Wetlands Kids at Wilderness Camp

HYDRIC SOILS. Background

MAFF Ministry of IfiriLE Agriculture Fisheries and Food

NDWRCDP Disclaimer This work was supported by the National Decentralized Water Resources Capacity Development Project (NDWRCDP) with funding provided

RALPH SIMMONS STATE FOREST 2016 LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBITS

2017 NACTA Contest FAQs for 2-Year and 4-Year Universities

BURIED SOILS OF GLOBE HILL, UPPER OHIO VALLEY

SOIL PROFILE STUDY GUIDE

6W9}* Appendix 2 to report No. P62 SOIL RESOURCES MAP OF TH E MPEKETONIAREA (LAMU AND TANA RIVER DISTRICTS) 40" 40 E LEGEND ISWC U8RAWY _& Jl W*g*n)ng

Geology of the Black River and Paw Paw River Watersheds. Dr. Tara Kneeshaw Grand Valley State University Department of Geology

NACTA 2013 Soils Judging-2 Year Division

Soil Formation. Parent Material. Time. Climate

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Michigan s Geology and Groundwater

For Sale at $437,500.00

Custom Soil Resource Report for St. Lucie County, Florida

Soil Profiles (West, Ch. 8)

Hydrogeological Assessment for Part of Lots 2 and 3, Concession 5, Township of Thurlow, County of Hastings 1.0 INTRODUCTION. 1.

4. Soils and soil conditions

Curtis Monger USDA-NRCS Developments in Soil Taxonomy

East Okoboji Lakefront Technical Assessment

MASS MOVEMENTS, WIND, AND GLACIERS

Custom Soil Resource Report for Bucks County, Pennsylvania

For Sale at: $136,000.00

Depth to the Apparent Water Table in 17 New York Soils from 1963 to 1970*

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gillespie County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Island County, Washington

Supplementary Material: Crop & Pasture Science, 2013, 64(12),

Custom Soil Resource Report for Pinal County, Arizona, Western Part

Custom Soil Resource Report for Valley County, Montana

Mass Movements, Wind, and Glaciers

LANDFORM ANALYSIS AND SOIL RESOURCE INVENTORY USING REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUE IN A WATERSHED OF UTTARANCHAL, INDIA

Class Schedule and Assignments

HYDROGEOLOGIC EVALUATION of REDUCED ISOLATION DISTANCE from WELL to WASTEWATER PIPING

NACTA. 2-Year Soils Contest Official Rules. Contest Directors: Dr. Brian Parr (270)

Soil Formation. Lesson Plan: NRES B2-4

ATTACHMENT A PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL SUMMARY

Figure DR3. Constraints on the depth of the hiatus surface based on 10 Be concentration of middle core sample.

Aperio Property Consultants, llc E. Grand Ave. Aurora, CO Phone (303) Contact: Aaron Thompson

Aqua Dome Express Car Wash

Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map

Appendix I SOIL RATING CHART. (Storie soil Index Rating = factor A* factor B* factor C* factor X) FACTOR A- Rating on character of Physical Profile

NACTA COLLEGIATE SOILS CONTEST RULES FOUR YEAR DIVISION

Custom Soil Resource Report for Wright County, Minnesota

Custom Soil Resource Report for Blanco and Burnet Counties, Texas

SOILS OF THE HIGH TERRACE REMNANTS IN THE UPPER OHIO VALLEY

Custom Soil Resource Report for Multnomah County Area, Oregon

MEMORANDUM FOR SWG

Rising Sea Simulation in Buzzards Bay! Via the Augmented Reality Sandbox

GEOLOGY AND SOILS Introduction

GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Parks Highway Connections Museum Drive. Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska.

4. What type of glacier forms in a sloping valley between rock walls? a. firn glacier b. ice sheet c. cirque d. alpine glacier

MATRIX COLOR TEXTURE STRUCTURE CONSISTENCE REDOX FEATURES NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (IN.) O 0-1. granular friable None. λa

Custom Soil Resource Report for Falls County, Texas

Custom Soil Resource Report for Yates County, New York

Custom Soil Resource Report for San Luis Obispo County, California, Paso Robles Area


Erosion and Deposition in a Juniper Woodland: The Chicken or the Egg?

Custom Soil Resource Report for Berkshire County, Massachusetts

Precision Soil Map for Future Vineyards 55 Acre Site

GEOL.3250 Geology for Engineers Glacial Geology

How & Where does infiltration work? Summary of Geologic History Constraints/benefits for different geologic units

SITE EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE WASTEWATER RECLAMATION TEST SITE Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado

Custom Soil Resource Report for Highlands County, Florida

Custom Soil Resource Report for Southampton County, Virginia

Preliminary soil survey of the NATL Old Field Plots

Master Horizons. O horizon A horizon E horizon B horizon C horizon R horizon W horizon O A E

NCSS/NRCS Updates & New Horizon Designation for ^Anthropogenic Soils. Jim Turenne, CPSS Assistant State Soil Scientist RI USDA NRCS

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

Custom Soil Resource Report for Gem County Area, Idaho

APPENDIX C HYDROGEOLOGIC INVESTIGATION

Custom Soil Resource Report for Clackamas County Area, Oregon

NACTA COLLEGIATE SOILS CONTEST FOUR YEAR DIVISION OFFICIAL RULES AND PROCEDURES

Custom Soil Resource Report for Northumberland County, Pennsylvania

Custom Soil Resource Report for Okeechobee County, Florida

Feet. SAND; clayey, fine grained; shells are common; rounded quartz grains. SHELLS; muddy; almost no sand, shells and fragments common

Custom Soil Resource Report for Missoula County Area, Montana

Custom Soil Resource Report for Hill County, Texas

Guidelines for Using the NTCHS Indicators of Hydric Soils. 1.NTCHS Indicators of Hydric Soils (p1)

3.2.2 Ecological units of the Des Quinze lake proposed biodiversity reserve

16 January 2018 Job Number: RICHARD NEWMAN C\- CLARK FORTUNE MCDONALD AND ASSOCIATES PO BOX 553 QUEENSTOWN

GIS Assessment and Modeling to Support Soil Landscape Correlation. Southern Regional Cooperative Soil Survey Conference July 17, 2008

Transcription:

1 On-Site Soils Investigation Buttermilk Way Storm water Treatment Project Buzzards Bay. MA February 28 th, 2012 Glenn Stanisewski, Resource Soil Scientist, USDA-NRCS, West Wareham, MA Introduction: The purpose of this on-site visit was to evaluate the soil at two predetermined locations for the installation of a subsurface storm water treatment system at Taylor Point in the town of Buzzards Bay. Currently untreated storm water runoff is entering Onset Bay and Butler Cove resulting in the closing of shellfish beds. Participants: Bernie Taber Soil Conservationist, NRCS West Wareham Service Center, and Glenn Stanisewski Resource Soil Scientist, NRCS West Wareham Service Center. Evaluation: The investigation involved describing the soil profile at the two desired locations to a depth of 65 inches (Figure 1). The town of Buzzards Bay Public Works department excavated the soil pits to a depth of six feet using a backhoe (Figure 2). Figure 1: GPS locations of soil pits (yellow dots).

Figure 2: Soil pit #1 backhoe trench. 2

3 Results: Soil Pit #1 GPS Point 131 Sandy Fill material over a Carver loamy coarse sand natural soil Soil Survey Mapunit: 245A Hinckley sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Soil Parent Material: Glacial Till Glacial Outwash X Alluvium Eolian Outwash Lacustrine Fill X Organic Landform: Ridge Terrace X Esker Moraine Drumlin Depression Swale Drainageway Floodplain Dune Kame X Upland Slope Shape: Convex Concave Linear X Undulating Slope Gradient (%): 1 Elevation: 18 ft. GPS WP & Coordinates: WP131: 41.743 N Lat. 70.623 W Long. Depth Horizon Color Texture Consistence Structure RMF s % Rock Frags. by Volume 0-9 ^A1 10YR 2/2 Very dark grayish Loamy sand Loose Weak fine & medium granular 9-14 ^A2 10YR 2/2 Very dark grayish 14-19 ^Bw 10YR 4/4 Yellowish Loamy sand Coarse sandy loam Loose Very friable Weak fine granular Weak fine subangular blocky 19-26 Ab 10YR 3/1 Very dark gray 26-28 Eb 10YR 6/1 Gray Loamy coarse sand Coarse sand Loose Single grain Loose Single grain 28-36 Bwb 7.5YR 4/4 Brown Sand Loose Single grain 36-50 C1b 10YR 5/4 Yellowish 50-65 C2b 10YR 5/4 Yellowish Sand Loose Single grain Gravelly sand Loose Single grain 15% gravel Additional Notes (% surface stones, rock outcrop, etc.): Standing water observed in the trench at 65 inches from the surface. There is approximately 1.5 ft. of sandy fill over a loamy coarse sand Carver soil type.

Figure 3: Soil pit #1 profile showing ^A1, ^A2, ^Bw, Ab, Eb, and Bwb horizons (top to bottom) separated by tees. 4

5 Soil Pit #2 - GPS Point 132 Thin layer of fill material over a Hinckley loamy sand soil Soil Survey Mapunit: 245A Hinckley sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Soil Parent Material: Glacial Till Glacial Outwash X Alluvium Eolian Outwash Lacustrine Fill X Organic Landform: Ridge Terrace X Esker Moraine Drumlin Depression Swale Drainageway Floodplain Dune Kame X Upland Slope Shape: Convex Concave Linear X Undulating Slope Gradient (%): 0-1 Elevation: 18 ft. GPS WP & Coordinates: WP132: 41.743 N Lat. 71.6234 W Long. Depth Horizon Color Texture Consistence Structure RMF s % Rock Frags. by Volume 0 3 ^A 10YR 3/2 Loamy sand Loose Single grain Very dark grayish 3 5 ^M Black Impermeable Asphalt Rigid Massive 5 7 ^C 10YR 4/4 Yellowish 7 12 A 10YR 3/2 Very dark grayish 12 16 AE 10YR 4/2 Dark Grayish Brown 16 36 Bhs 7.5YR 4/4 Brown & 5 YR 3/4 Dark Reddish Brown 36 53 C1 7.5YR 4/4 Brown 53 65 C2 10YR 6/4 Light yellowish Gravelly sand (road base) Loose Single grain 15% fine gravel Loamy sand Loose Single grain 5% fine gravel Sand Loose Single grain 5% fine gravel Very Gravelly Sand Loose Single grain 35% gravel Very Gravelly Coarse Sand Loose Single grain 45% gravel Sand Loose Single grain 5% fine gravel Additional Notes (% surface stones, rock outcrop, etc.): Saturation observed in trench at 89 inches from surface. Bhs horizon had many, prominent, fine, medium, and coarse 5YR 3/4 masses of iron accumulation.

Figure 6: Soil pit#2 profile showing ^A, ^M, ^C, A, AE, Bhs, C1 and C2 horizons (top to bottom) separated by tees. 6

Figure 7: Close up of Soil Pit site #2 showing fill material (^A, ^M, ^C horizons) separated by tees. 7

8 Discussion: The soil described at Site #1 had between 1.5 feet and 2.0 feet of sandy fill material over a natural sandy glacial outwash soil known as Carver. The fill material is associated with the construction of the Massachusetts Maritime Academy s Capt. Charles Hurley library and parking lot which included a lot of land leveling in addition to the fill material (mapped as 665 Udipsamments, smoothed in the soil survey report). There were no indications of a seasonal high water table in soil pit #1 to a depth of 65 inches. Saturation was observed in the trench at a depth of 65 inches. Like the Carver soil, this soil is Excessively well drained with a Soil Hydrologic Group A designation. The soil described at Site #2 was on the town s Right of Way (Beach Way) which is a public access point to the bay and a small beach area. The soil profile had a very thin layer of fill material (seven inches thick) that is associated with the construction of a paved walk way leading down to the beach. In recent years adjoining private landowners had installed sod over the asphalt covering it up (Figure 7). There were no indications of a seasonal high water table in soil pit #2 to a depth of 65 inches. Saturation was observed in the trench at a depth of 89 inches. The natural soil profile had a subsurface Bhs horizon (at 16-36 inches) that showed masses of iron accumulation consistent with spodic soil development. The natural soil profile fit the description of the Hinckley soil series that was identified on the soil survey map (mapunit 245A). Hinckley is an Excessively well drained sandy and gravelly glacial outwash soil with a Soil Hydrologic Group A designation. Summary and Conclusions: Based on this on-site investigation there were no indicators of a seasonal high water table within the upper five feet for either soil pit sites. There appears to be no water table limitations for the installation of a subsurface storm water treatment system. Additional Attachments 1. Soil Pit Location Map 2. Copies of original soil data sheets