GaAs and InGaAs Single Electron Hex. Title. Author(s) Kasai, Seiya; Hasegawa, Hideki. Citation 13(2-4): Issue Date DOI

Similar documents
Quantum Dot Structures Measuring Hamming Distance for Associative Memories

SINGLE-ELECTRON CIRCUITS PERFORMING DENDRITIC PATTERN FORMATION WITH NATURE-INSPIRED CELLULAR AUTOMATA

Design Considerations for Integrated Semiconductor Control Electronics for a Large-scale Solid State Quantum Processor

DESIGN OF QCA FULL ADDER CIRCUIT USING CORNER APPROACH INVERTER

OMEN an atomistic and full-band quantum transport simulator for post-cmos nanodevices

Performance Analysis of Ultra-Scaled InAs HEMTs

Diode-like characteristics ofnanometer-scale semiconductor channels with a broken symmetry

Nanocarbon Technology for Development of Innovative Devices

TECHNOLOGY scaling predicted by Moore s law has

Low-dimensional electron transport properties in InAs/AlGaSb mesoscopic structures

Anisotropic spin splitting in InGaAs wire structures

Implementation of Quantum dot Cellular Automata based Novel Full Adder and Full Subtractor

Nanoelectronics. Topics

Semiconductor Nanowires: Motivation

Design of A Efficient Hybrid Adder Using Qca

Quantum-dot cellular automata

Enhancement-mode quantum transistors for single electron spin

Construction of a reconfigurable dynamic logic cell

Single ion implantation for nanoelectronics and the application to biological systems. Iwao Ohdomari Waseda University Tokyo, Japan

Double Feynman Gate (F2G) in Quantumdot Cellular Automata (QCA)

Novel Bit Adder Using Arithmetic Logic Unit of QCA Technology

STUDY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MUX BASED FPGA IN QCA TECHNOLOGY

Title. Author(s)Yoshizawa, Naoki; Sato, Taketomo; Hashizume, Tamotsu. CitationJapanese Journal of Applied Physics, 48(9): Issue Date

A NOVEL PRESENTATION OF PERES GATE (PG) IN QUANTUM-DOT CELLULAR AUTOMATA(QCA)

Ultralow-Power Reconfigurable Computing with Complementary Nano-Electromechanical Carbon Nanotube Switches

QUANTUM INTERFERENCE IN SEMICONDUCTOR RINGS

MTJ-Based Nonvolatile Logic-in-Memory Architecture and Its Application

Design of Optimized Quantum-dot Cellular Automata RS Flip Flops

Two Bit Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) in QCA Namit Gupta 1, K.K. Choudhary 2 and Sumant Katiyal 3 1

Design of Arithmetic Logic Unit (ALU) using Modified QCA Adder

BINARY TO GRAY CODE CONVERTER IMPLEMENTATION USING QCA

single-electron electron tunneling (SET)

Directions for simulation of beyond-cmos devices. Dmitri Nikonov, George Bourianoff, Mark Stettler

III-V field-effect transistors for low power digital logic applications

IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMMABLE LOGIC DEVICES IN QUANTUM CELLULAR AUTOMATA TECHNOLOGY

Emerging Research Devices: A Study of CNTFET and SET as a replacement for SiMOSFET

Low Frequency Noise in MoS 2 Negative Capacitance Field-effect Transistor

!"#$%&'()*"+,-./*($-"#+"0+'*"12%3+ (#3+4"#&'*"12%3+5'6+6)17-$%1$/)%8*

Design of an Optimal Decimal Adder in Quantum Dot Cellular Automata

Cut-and-Paste Organic FET Customized ICs for Application to Artificial Skin

Evaluation of Electronic Characteristics of Double Gate Graphene Nanoribbon Field Effect Transistor for Wide Range of Temperatures

Design and Implementation of Carry Adders Using Adiabatic and Reversible Logic Gates

GHZ ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF CARBON NANOTUBES ON SILICON DIOXIDE MICRO BRIDGES

Enhanced peak-to-valley current ratio in InGaAs/ InAlAs trench-type quantum-wire negative differential resistance field-effect transistors

Electronic states of self-organized InGaAs quantum dots on GaAs (3 1 1)B studied by conductive scanning probe microscope

OPTI510R: Photonics. Khanh Kieu College of Optical Sciences, University of Arizona Meinel building R.626

Comprehensive Understanding of Carrier Mobility in MOSFETs with Oxynitrides and Ultrathin Gate Oxides

Graphene Novel Material for Nanoelectronics

DELAY EFFICIENT BINARY ADDERS IN QCA K. Ayyanna 1, Syed Younus Basha 2, P. Vasanthi 3, A. Sreenivasulu 4

How a single defect can affect silicon nano-devices. Ted Thorbeck

Study on Semiconductor Lasers of Circular Structures Fabricated by EB Lithography

DESİGN AND ANALYSİS OF FULL ADDER CİRCUİT USİNG NANOTECHNOLOGY BASED QUANTUM DOT CELLULAR AUTOMATA (QCA)

Zeeman splitting of single semiconductor impurities in resonant tunneling heterostructures

A final review session will be offered on Thursday, May 10 from 10AM to 12noon in 521 Cory (the Hogan Room).

Nature-inspired Analog Computing on Silicon

Serial Parallel Multiplier Design in Quantum-dot Cellular Automata

Comparison of Ultra-Thin InAs and InGaAs Quantum Wells and Ultra-Thin-Body Surface-Channel MOSFETs

Surfaces, Interfaces, and Layered Devices

Pseudomorphic HEMT quantum well AlGaAs/InGaAs/GaAs with AlAs:δ-Si donor layer

Formation of unintentional dots in small Si nanostructures

VTCMOS characteristics and its optimum conditions predicted by a compact analytical model

Reliability Modeling of Nanoelectronic Circuits

I. INTRODUCTION. CMOS Technology: An Introduction to QCA Technology As an. T. Srinivasa Padmaja, C. M. Sri Priya

Periodic Magnetoresistance Oscillations in Side-Gated Quantum Dots

Room-Temperature Ballistic Nanodevices

Quantum Size Effect of Two Couple Quantum Dots

HYSWITCH Informal meeting Chersonissos - Crete September 15th 19th 2007,

Electrostatics of Nanowire Transistors

NOVEL QCA CONTROL GATE AND NEW DESIGNING OF MEMORY ON THE BASIS OF QUANTUM DOT CELLULAR AUTOMATA WITH MINIMUM QCA BLOCKS

DESIGN OF AREA-DELAY EFFICIENT ADDER BASED CIRCUITS IN QUANTUM DOT CELLULAR AUTOMATA

Investigation of possibility of high temperature quantum-dot cellular automata

Demonstration of a functional quantum-dot cellular automata cell

Quasiadiabatic switching for metal-island quantum-dot cellular automata

Quantum Dot Lasers. Jose Mayen ECE 355

Self-Assembled InAs Quantum Dots on Patterned InP Substrates

Supplementary Figure S1. AFM images of GraNRs grown with standard growth process. Each of these pictures show GraNRs prepared independently,

3/10/2013. Lecture #1. How small is Nano? (A movie) What is Nanotechnology? What is Nanoelectronics? What are Emerging Devices?

A Novel LUT Using Quaternary Logic

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF CLA CIRCUITS USING SAL AND REVERSIBLE LOGIC GATES FOR ULTRA LOW POWER APPLICATIONS

A Novel Design and Implementation of New Double Feynman and Six-correction logic (DFSCL) gates in Quantum-dot Cellular Automata (QCA)

Technology Development for InGaAs/InP-channel MOSFETs

Developing Quantum Logic Gates: Spin-Resonance-Transistors

From nanophysics research labs to cell phones. Dr. András Halbritter Department of Physics associate professor

Transient Harman Measurement of the Cross-plane ZT of InGaAs/InGaAlAs Superlattices with Embedded ErAs Nanoparticles

Emerging Interconnect Technologies for CMOS and beyond-cmos Circuits

Analysis of flip flop design using nanoelectronic single electron transistor

!"#"$#%&'(&)(*+,'#+-(."//+/,0( 1+#&-,#&'(1$#%&'(%'(2%/%$&'3&'3 %'4+/,#&0(."//4#

NONLINEAR TRANSPORT IN BALLISTIC SEMICONDUCTOR DIODES WITH NEGATIVE EFFECTIVE MASS CARRIERS

Superconducting Single-photon Detectors

Resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs)

Chapter 3 Properties of Nanostructures

Lecture 3: Heterostructures, Quasielectric Fields, and Quantum Structures

NEM Relay Design for Compact, Ultra-Low-Power Digital Logic Circuits

Effective Capacitance Enhancement Methods for 90-nm DRAM Capacitors

3-1-2 GaSb Quantum Cascade Laser

Physics and Material Science of Semiconductor Nanostructures

III-V CMOS: What have we learned from HEMTs? J. A. del Alamo, D.-H. Kim 1, T.-W. Kim, D. Jin, and D. A. Antoniadis

Radiation Effects in Nano Inverter Gate

Investigation on Mode Splitting and Degeneracy in the L3 Photonic Crystal Nanocavity via Unsymmetrical Displacement of Air-Holes

Universal valence-band picture of. the ferromagnetic semiconductor GaMnAs

Transcription:

Title GaAs and InGaAs Single Electron Hex Circuits Based on Binary Decision D Author(s) Kasai, Seiya; Hasegawa, Hideki Citation Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems 3(2-4): 925-929 Issue Date 2002-03 DOI Doc URLhttp://hdl.handle.net/25/8359 Right Type article (author version) Additional Information File Information MSS0.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and

GaAs and InGaAs Single Electron Hexagonal Nanowire Circuits Based on Binary Decision Diagram Logic Architecture Seiya Kasai and Hideki Hasegawa Research Center for Integrated Quantum Electronics and Graduate School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hokkaido University, N-3, W-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan Abstract The feasibility of a novel approach for single electron quantum LSIs (Q-LSIs) is investigated. It is based on the binary-decision-diagram (BDD) logic architecture, using arrays of GaAs and InGaAs single electron BDD node devices formed on hexagonal networks. Single electron branch switches using nanometer-scale Schottky wrap gates (WPGs) on AlGaAs/GaAs etched s and on InGaAs s by selective MBE growth were fabricated. They showed clear conductance oscillation characteristics controlled by a single electron lateral resonant tunneling. Successful design and fabrication of GaAs-based single electron BDD node devices and circuits including OR logic elements and a 2 bit adder indicates basic feasibility of realizing single electron Q-LSIs by the novel approach. Keywords: GaAs, InGaAs, Hexagonal network, BDD, Single electron circuit Corresponding: S. Kasai, RCIQE, Hokkaido University, N-3, W-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-8628, Japan, Tel: +8--706-776, Fax: +8--76-6004, E-mail: kasai@rciqe.hokudai.ac.jp

. Introduction Recent progress of the information technology (IT) has opened up a world-wide internet era. The demand of society is increasing for further development of the IT and this will soon exceed the scale down limit of the conventional Si CMOS LSI technology. Nanoelectronics based on semiconductor quantum devices and quantum large scale integrated circuits (Q-LSIs) are promising candidates to overcome such limitation, since they can realize further miniaturization of device dimensions, and they operate on a new principle with ultra-small delay-power products near the quantum limit. The nanoelectronics providing nano-sensing and nano-control is also expected to play important roles in rapidly grown nanotechnology that covers wide research areas. However, no realistic prospect for Q-LSIs exists at present. One of the reasons is that one tends to stick to the Boolean logic gate architecture that requires very uniform and robust devices. This paper investigates the feasibility of our novel approach[,2] for single electron (SE) Q-LSIs based on the binary-decision-diagram (BDD) logic architecture[3], using arrays of GaAs and InGaAs SE BDD node devices formed on hexagonal networks. 2. Concept of hexagonal single electron BDD The concept of the hexagonal single electron BDD approach is shown in Fig.. In this approach, the graph representing a logic function is implemented on a hexagonal network as shown in Fig. a and a single electron is used as a signal messenger. Each node devices placed at proper node positions on the network has one entry- and two exit-branches as shown in Fig. b. Because the node device has the basic three-fold branch symmetry, closely packed hexagonal networks provides most suitable layouts and high-density integration of devices. The BDD requires no direct output-to-input connection, thereby none of large voltage gain, precise 2

input-output voltage matching, large fan-in and fan-out numbers and large current drivability are necessary. These are suited to non-robust SE devices which can be operated near ultra small delay-power product near the quantum limit[4]. For hardware implementation, GaAs and InGaAs hexagonal networks controlled by nanometer scale Schottky wrap gates (WPGs)[5] shown in Figs. c and d are used. The WPG structure provides tight gate control, strong electron confinement. Its simple lateral structure is suitable for planar integration. Examples of SE BDD node devices designed utilizing the WPG are shown in Figs. e and f. The former is a node-switch device having three WPGs and a quantum dot[]. The latter is a branch-switch device consisting of two 2-gate WPG single electron transistors (SETs). 3. GaAs and InGaAs hexagonal networks The GaAs hexagonal networks were formed on the AlGaAs/GaAs modulation doped heterostructure by EB lithography and wet chemical etching. This is a conventional mature process and it is suitable for studying feasibility of our approach. An example of a fabricated structure is shown in Fig. 2a. The geometrical width, W, was 450 nm. Each hexagon had 4.5 µm x 2.5 µm area and this corresponds to a node density of 0 7 cm -2. The InGaAs hexagonal networks were fabricated by a selective MBE growth of InAlAs/InGaAs heterostructure on InP substrates with hexagonal pattern. This selective MBE technique can potentially provide narrow s necessary for room temperature operation in the single electron regime. For the growth, low-temperature atomic hydrogen (H*) cleaning of InP substrate and H* assisted growth were applied to the formation of initial ridge structure in order to obtain uniform without discontinuity [6]. Figure 2b shows an example of the fabricated InGaAs hexagonal network. Smooth and uniform structure was obtained. 3

The wire width can be controlled by growth condition and a minimum effective width of 6 nm has been achieved[6]. Overall optimization of the growth process has led to a successful formation of a network structure with a sub-micrometer pitch[7]. This structure allows a node density of 0 8 cm -2. To construct SE branch switches, two 50-00 nm-length WPGs with a few hundred nm spacing were formed on the by the EB lithography, metal deposition and lift-off process. Examples of the fabricated GaAs SE BDD node devices are shown in Figs. 2c and 2d. 4. WPG control of s The single electron transport was confirmed by conductance measurement on SE branch-switch devices utilizing GaAs and InGaAs s. Figures 3a and 3b show conductance oscillation characteristics in fabricated GaAs and InGaAs SE branch switches with 2-gate WPG SETs in Figs. d and e, respectively. They showed a small number of high conductance peaks which were visible up to 20-30 K. This behavior is quite different from that of conventional metal SETs and III-V SETs using Schottky split gates[8,9]. The present InGaAs device had a wire width of 00 nm and operation in the quantum regime at higher temperatures can be expected in InGaAs devices by reducing the width. The conductance peak height is an important parameter to determine the delay-power product for single electron devices[4]. Figure 3c shows the conductance peak height as a function of temperature in the GaAs WPG SE branch switch. Theoretical behavior by a single electron resonant tunneling is also shown. Here, the Breit-Wigner formula[0] was used for tunneling probability, T(E). Γ is the line width of T(E). The theory well reproduced the experimental results. In the low temperature limit, the peak height becomes less dependent on temperature and approaches to e 2 /h as predicted by the Breit-Wigner formula. This shows that the 4

transport in the WPG SE devices is controlled by a single electron resonant tunneling. Based on this model, device design including conductance characteristics became possible. 5. Single electron BDD circuits Arrays of SE BDD node devices can be fabricated using the hexagonal networks. Both of fabricated SE node devices based on GaAs WPG structures as shown in Fig. 2c and 2d exhibited proper switching operation with the single electron transport at.5 K. However, the branch-switch device seems to be better from viewpoints of reducing dot size and wiring. The GaAs WPG node devices can show proper switching operation at room temperature[], since the WPG can act as a classical FET switch at high temperatures. Fundamental operation of the SE BDD logic circuit was confirmed by fabrication and characterization of OR logic elements which have one node-switch device and one branch-switch device as shown in Fig 4a. The operation of the circuit at.5 K is shown in Fig. 4b. The messenger electrons were sent from the root to the terminal- by applying a voltage of V DD = mv between them, and the current in the terminal- was measured as an output signal in response to two gate input voltage pulses, x and x 2, with amplitudes, V Gx = 00 mev and V Gx2 = 400 mev, respectively. Clear waveforms were obtained. Correct output was also obtained even at 20 K in the classical regime. Reduction of the wire size by applying the InGaAs should lead to room temperature operation in the single electron quantum regime. Possible switching speed and power consumption at low temperature were estimated from the charging energy and the conductance[4] and resulted in ns and 0. pw, respectively. Estimated delay-power product is 0-22 J which is much smaller than 0-5 J of the conventional Si CMOS transistor switch. To see the feasibility of our hexagonal BDD approach for large-scale integration, a hexagonal SE BDD 2-bit adder was designed as shown in Fig. 5(a). Suitable layout design of the 5

circuit can be successfully made on the hexagonal network without any crossover. In this circuit, 4 devices are integrated. Based on this design, the adder with branch switch devices could be successfully fabricated as shown in Fig. 5b. This utilizes the GaAs hexagonal network shown in Fig. 2a and the circuit size is 27 µm x 5 µm. Using the submicron pitch InGaAs hexagonal network[7], the size is reduced down to 9 µm x 6 µm. Gate inputs were wired by a conventional multi-layer wiring process. The operation of this circuit is under test at present, and will be reported elsewhere. 6. Conclusion This work investigated basic feasibility of a novel approach for single electron (SE) Q-LSIs based on the BDD logic architecture, using arrays of GaAs and InGaAs SE node devices on hexagonal networks. The SE branch switches using GaAs etched s and selective MBE grown InGaAs s controlled by Schottky WPGs were fabricated and they showed clear conductance oscillations controlled by a single electron lateral resonant tunneling. Successful design and fabrication of SE BDD node devices and circuits based on GaAs WPG structures, including OR logic elements and a 2-bit adder, seems to indicate feasibility of realization of SE Q-LSIs by the novel approach. This work has been financially supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) (#3305020), Scientific Research (B) (#2555083) and a Grant-in-Aid for Encouragement of Young Scientists (#2750286), all from Japan Society for Promotion of Science. 6

References [] S. Kasai, Y. Amemiya and H. Hasegawa, Tech. Dig. 2000 IEEE IEDM (2000) 585. [2] H. Hasegawa and S. Kasai, presented at Advanced Workshop on Semiconductor Nanostuctures, Feb. 5-9, 200, Queenstown, New Zealand. To appear in Physica E (200). [3] S. B. Akers, IEEE Trans. Computers C27 (978) 509. [4] J. E. Mooij, Extended Abstracts of 993 Int. Conf. on Solid State Devices and Material, (993) 339. [5] S. Kasai, K. Jinushi, H. Tomozawa and H. Hasegawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36 (997) 678. [6] T. Muranaka, C. Jiang, A. Ito and H. Hasegawa, Thin Solid Films 380 (2000) 89. [7] A. Ito, T. Muranaka, S. Kasai and H. Hasegawa, Conf. Proc. of 3th Int. Conf. on Indium Phosphide and Related Materials (200) 52. [8] L. P. Kouwenhoven et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (99) 626. [9] E. B. Foxman et al., Phys. Rev. B 47 (993) 0020. [0] C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. B 44 (99) 646. [] M. Yumoto, S. Kasai and H. Hasegawa, accepted for presentation at 200 Int. Conf. on Solid State Devices and Material, Sep. 26-28, Tokyo. 7

Figure captions Fig. Basic concept of the hexagonal single electron BDD. (a) architecture. (b) single electron BDD node device. (c) and (d) : WPG controlled GaAs and InGaAs s. (e) and (f) : examples of WPG SE BDD node devices. Fig.2 SEM images of fabricated (a) GaAs and (b) InGaAs hexagonal networks, and (c) and (d) fabricated GaAs SE BDD node devices. Fig.3 Conductance oscillations in WPG SE BDD node devices using (a) GaAs and (b) InGaAs s. (c) Temperature dependence of the conductance peak height in the GaAs device. Fig. 4 (a) SEM image and schematic diagram of GaAs SE BDD OR logic element and (b) its input/output waveform. Fig. 5 (a) Circuit design of the hexagonal SE BDD 2-bit adder and (b) an SEM image of the fabricated circuit. 8

root r x r2 x2 xi r3 x3 node device......... single electron gate input xi 0 exit branches 0 0 terminals (a) (b) GaAs WPG WPG InGaAs GaAs InAlAs entry branch AlGaAs (c) entry WPG x i quantum dot x i x i InGaAs InP sub. (d) entry x i tunnel 0 junction 0 WPG (e) (f) Figure Kasai et al.

GaAs etched InGaAs 2 µm 2 µm (a) (b) GaAs entry µm WPG GaAs entry 500 nm x i x i x i x i 0-branch (c) -branch 0-branch WPG (d) -branch Figure 2 Kasai et al.

3 GaAs device.0 0.8 InGaAs device T = 27 K V DS = 0.5 mv I DS (na) 2 0 T=24K 9K K 6K 4.2K 3.5K 2.5K.6K G max (e 2 /h) -360-320 V G (mv) (a).0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 mev V DS =0.mV -280 0. mev 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 200 300 400 V G (mv) (b) = 4 mev 3 mev 2 mev GaAs device exp. theory.5 mev 20 K 7 K.6 K 0 5 0 5 20 25 30 T (K) (c) Figure 3 Kasai et al.

root x (node-switch) root x 2 (branchswitch) WPG 0 x 2 x node device output current (na) GaAs - terminal 0.3 0.2 0. T =.5 K x x 2 output (dummy) 000 nm (a) terminal V Gx = 00 mv V Gx2 = 400 mv VDD = mv 2 3 4 5 time (sec) 6 7 (b) Figure 4 Kasai et al.

WPG root c s s0 0 00 a 0 0 0 b c s s0 a SE node device b a0 b0 0 0 0 GaAs a0 terminal b0 augend: a, a0 addend: b, b0 sum: s, s0 carry:c WPG terminal- 5 µm (a) (b) Figure 5 Kasai et al.