MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 12: Summary. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

Similar documents
MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 4: XRF

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 5: RBS. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 11: Scanning Probe Microscopy. Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST

MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 2: UPS

raw materials C V Mn Mg S Al Ca Ti Cr Si G H Nb Na Zn Ni K Co A B C D E F

Surface and Interface Characterization of Polymer Films

Applications of XPS, AES, and TOF-SIMS

EE 527 MICROFABRICATION. Lecture 5 Tai-Chang Chen University of Washington

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

ECE Semiconductor Device and Material Characterization

ToF-SIMS or XPS? Xinqi Chen Keck-II

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) Prof. Paul K. Chu

Auger Electron Spectroscopy Overview

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MOST MERCIFUL AND COMPASSIONATE

X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Prof. Paul K. Chu

CVD-3 SIO-HU SiO 2 Process

CVD-3 MFSIN-HU-2 SiN x Mixed Frequency Process

CVD-3 LFSIN SiN x Process

Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry

Case Study of Electronic Materials Packaging with Poor Metal Adhesion and the Process for Performing Root Cause Failure Analysis

Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES)

Supplementary Figure S1. AFM characterizations and topographical defects of h- BN films on silica substrates. (a) (c) show the AFM height

CVD-3 MFSIN-HU-1 SiN x Mixed Frequency Process

Characterization of Ultra-Shallow Implants Using Low-Energy Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry: Surface Roughening under Cesium Bombardment

Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Preamble: Emphasis: Material = Device? MTSE 719 PHYSICAL PRINCIPLES OF CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLIDS

Surface and Micro-Analysis of Organic Materials

Nanoelectronics 09. Atsufumi Hirohata Department of Electronics. Quick Review over the Last Lecture

GRAPHENE ON THE Si-FACE OF SILICON CARBIDE USER MANUAL

Removal of Cu Impurities on a Si Substrate by Using (H 2 O 2 +HF) and (UV/O 3 +HF)

Introduction to X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) XPS which makes use of the photoelectric effect, was developed in the mid-1960

Surface Analysis - The Principal Techniques

CHARACTERIZING PROCESS SEMICONDUCTOR THIN FILMS WITH A CONFOCAL MICRO X-RAY FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPE

Characterization of Secondary Emission Materials for Micro-Channel Plates. S. Jokela, I. Veryovkin, A. Zinovev

Application of Surface Analysis for Root Cause Failure Analysis

Impurities and Electronic Property Variations of Natural MoS 2 Crystal Surfaces

Residual Metallic Contamination of. Transferred Chemical Vapor Deposited. Graphene

Lecture 23 X-Ray & UV Techniques

PHI 5000 Versaprobe-II Focus X-ray Photo-electron Spectroscopy

Surface Sensitivity & Surface Specificity

Nanoscale IR spectroscopy of organic contaminants

Review. Surfaces of Biomaterials. Characterization. Surface sensitivity

Chapter 10. Nanometrology. Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

Nanoscale Chemical Characterization: Moving to 3 Dimensions

Surface analysis techniques

Chapter 12. Nanometrology. Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

Supplementary Figure 1: AFM topography of the graphene/sio 2 [(a) and (c)] and graphene/h BN [(b) and (d)] surfaces acquired before [(a) and (b)],

Infrastructure of Thin Films Laboratory in Institute of Molecular Physics Polish Academy of Sciences

Auger Electron Spectroscopy *

Lecture 5: Characterization methods

Introduction to SIMS Basic principles Components Techniques Drawbacks Figures of Merit Variations Resources

XPS/UPS and EFM. Brent Gila. XPS/UPS Ryan Davies EFM Andy Gerger

CVD: General considerations.

Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)

The Inclusion of Impurities in Graphene Grown on Silicon Carbide

XPS Surface Characterization of Disposable Laboratory Gloves and the Transfer of Glove Components to Other Surfaces

Surface Analysis - The Principal Techniques

Materials Characterization. Foothill College Nanotechnology Program

Supporting Information

IONTOF. Latest Developments in 2D and 3D TOF-SIMS Analysis. Surface Analysis Innovations and Solutions for Industry 2017 Coventry

FEASIBILITY OF IN SITU TXRF

Pattern Transfer- photolithography

AP5301/ Name the major parts of an optical microscope and state their functions.

Surface Analytical Techniques for Analysis of Coatings Mary Jane Walzak, Mark Biesinger and Brad Kobe The University of Western Ontario, Surface

Microscopical and Microanalytical Methods (NANO3)

MODERN TECHNIQUES OF SURFACE SCIENCE

The design of an integrated XPS/Raman spectroscopy instrument for co-incident analysis

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

Auger Electron Spectrometry. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

Use of PV 25 in the PV Industry: Strengths and Weaknesses. Larry Wang, Ph.D. Evans Analytical Group Sunnyvale, CA, USA

Surface Analysis. Dr. Lynn Fuller Dr. Fuller s Webpage:

In-situ Ar Plasma Cleaning of Samples Prior to Surface Analysis

Nanostructure. Materials Growth Characterization Fabrication. More see Waser, chapter 2

Controlled Electroless Deposition of Nanostructured Precious Metal Films on Germanium Surfaces

EE143 Fall 2016 Microfabrication Technologies. Lecture 6: Thin Film Deposition Reading: Jaeger Chapter 6

An Introduction to Auger Electron Spectroscopy

Progress on Transmutation Experiments induced by D 2 gas permeation

Methods of surface analysis

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FOR PHONON TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS AT SOLID INTERFACES

Supporting Information s for

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

EE C245 ME C218 Introduction to MEMS Design Fall 2007

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

Instrumentation and Operation

1 Introduction COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. 1.1 HowdoweDefinetheSurface?

Low Voltage Field Emission SEM (LV FE-SEM): A Promising Imaging Approach for Graphene Samples

ECE Semiconductor Device and Material Characterization

MEMS Metrology. Prof. Tianhong Cui ME 8254

Cleaning of Silicon-Containing Carbon Contamination

Effects of plasma treatment on the precipitation of fluorine-doped silicon oxide

IV. Surface analysis for chemical state, chemical composition

Overview of X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis

Dr. Tim Nunney Thermo Fisher Scientific, East Grinstead, UK Dr. Nick Bulloss Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA Dr. Harry Meyer III Oak Ridge

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Hydrogenation of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes

The Benefit of Wide Energy Range Spectrum Acquisition During Sputter Depth Profile Measurements

Transcription:

2015 Fall Semester MS482 Materials Characterization ( 재료분석 ) Lecture Note 12: Summary Byungha Shin Dept. of MSE, KAIST 1

Course Information Syllabus 1. Overview of various characterization techniques (1 lecture) 2. Chemical analysis techniques (8 lectures) 2.1. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) 2.2. Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS) 2.3. Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) 2.4. X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) 3. Ion beam based techniques (4 lecture) 3.1. Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry (RBS) 3.2. Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) 4. Diffraction and imaging techniques (7 lectures) 4.1. Basic diffraction theory 4.2. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) & X-ray Reflectometry (XRR) 4.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) & EDS 4.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) 5. Scanning probe techniques (1 lectures) 5.1. Scanning Tunneling Microscopy (STM) 5.2. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) 6. Summary: Examples of real materials characterization (1 lecture)

Technique Selection and Analysis Design Important Factors Knowledge of the product and process In-house analytical capabilities Characterization of problem Can the problem be localized to a specific processing step? Based on available data, what is known? What it isn't (information from prior negative results)? Sample preparation destructive vs. non-destructive sample size, geometry vacuum stability Is the sample or defect one of kind? Order of analyses if multiple techniques needed How clean is the surface? Is a technique too surface sensitive? Controls or references

Technique Selection and Analysis Design Defect/Contamination Analysis Is the defect chemical or physical? Is it on the surface or buried? How large is the area of interest? compare analysis areas of techniques sampling depth What is the substrate? insulators vs. conductors possible spectral interferences for species of interest (technique specific) Are quantitative (vs. qualitative) results important? What detection sensitivity is required? Is it organic or inorganic? CNT-IN-01-03A

Information Needed for Analysis Purpose of the analysis: what is the goal? Good/bad comparison, survey for unknown contaminants, need quantitative results, images of defects, etc.? Description of samples Include photos, maps, etc. Expected structure, concentrations, depths, etc. Previous analysis of similar samples Analysis requirements Depth of analysis (i.e., profile to at least 1µm depth) Depth resolution Specific detection limits Deadline for results, rush requirements Specific format for results

Handling and Shipping of Surface Analysis Samples Many surface analysis techniques analyze only the top few atomic layers of the sample so try to minimize handling of the samples as much as possible. Handle samples only with clean tweezers and gloves and even then, only touch the edges of the sample. When cutting samples avoid using lubricants or coolants. Try to avoid creating particles that could fall onto the area of analysis. If solvents are used to rinse samples, they may be washing off not only unwanted surface contamination but also the species of interest. Solvents can also add contaminants in some cases. Some techniques have special requirements: e.g. wafers for TXRF typically must double bagged in a cleanroom prior to shipping and should not be reopened unless side a cleanroom.

Handling and Shipping of Surface Analysis Samples Clearly label (or identify in some way) the back side of the samples. For the most surface sensitive techniques, avoid placing the samples so they are directly touching plastic bags which may outgas organics or transfer material onto the sample surface. For transport, samples can be left uncovered, but secure in a container, or they can be wrapped in clean lab wipes, lens tissue or the matte side of Al foil. They can then be placed in envelopes, clean glass vials, hard plastic vials or petri dishes. Please avoid vials that have silicone rubber seals or tops. Samples can be secured within their containers using small quantities of double-sticky tape, however the tape should not be used too close to the analytical area if possible. Most commercial semiconductor-specific shipping and storage products can also be used for small samples (e.g. Fluoroware etc.).

Comparing Analytical Techniques Depth of Analysis ~ ~ ~ ~ Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group

Comparing Analytical Techniques Thin Film Analysis Characteristic Film or Layer Thickness Film Stoichiometry & Depth Profile Morphology or Roughness Bulk Impurities (including atmospherics) Surface Composition Surface Impurities Recommended Methods SEM, TEM, AFM, XRR, XRF RBS, AES, XPS, LEXES, XRF, XRD SEM, AFM, XRR >0.5% EDS, AES, XPS, HFS, <0.5% SIMS, GDMS Elemental: XPS, AES Chemical: XPS Organic: TOF-SIMS Metallic: TXRF, TOF-SIMS, SurfaceSIMS, XPS, AES Organic: TOF-SIMS

Comparing Analytical Techniques Contaminants Characteristic Particles Residues Recommended Methods <1µm: SEM-EDS, AES, TEM <10µm: also TOF-SIMS, Raman >10µm: also FTIR, XPS Inorganic: SEM-EDS, AES, XPS, TOF-SIMS Organic: FTIR, Raman, XPS, TOF-SIMS Wafer Surface Metals TXRF, SurfaceSIMS, TOF-SIMS Stains, discolorations, or hazes General surface contamination SPM, SEM (physical characterization) XPS, AES, TOF-SIMS, FTIR, SEM-EDS (elemental/chemical characterization) XPS, AES, TOF-SIMS, SEM-EDS, FTIR, Raman, TXRF, SurfaceSIMS, GCMS

Comparing Analytical Techniques Depth Profiling Characteristic Dopants Major Constituents Small Areas Cross Section Recommended Methods SIMS, SurfaceSIMS and contaminants AES, XPS, RBS/HFS, SIMS, TOF-SIMS <10µm: AES <100µm: AES, SIMS, XPS FIB/Polishing with SEM/EDS, AES, TEM

Comparing Analytical Techniques Bulk Analysis Characteristic Dopants and contaminants Major Constituents Small Areas Cross Section Recommended Methods SIMS, SurfaceSIMS, GDMS, ICPMS, IGA AES, XPS, RBS/HFS, SIMS, TOF-SIMS, XRD, XRF <10µm: AES <100µm: AES, SIMS, XPS, XRD, XRF FIB/Polishing with SEM/EDS, AES, TEM

Analytical Techniques Copyright 2007 Evans Analytical Group

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques Tungsten Silicide Goal: evaluate information acquired from the same samples by different analytical methods Samples: two WSi x films deposited by CVD and sputtering processes CVD sample (WF 6 & SiH 4 Cl 2 ) WSi x Polysilicon -190 nm SiO 2-200 nm Si substrate Properties of interest Sputtered sample (composite target in Ar) WSi x SiO 2-80 nm Si substrate Thickness of WSi x layers Film stoichiometry Morphology & roughness Bulk impurities (including atmospherics) Surface composition / Surface impurities

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques CVD Sputtered AFM Results CVD film RMS roughness: 6 nm Grain size: 50 nm Surface area difference: 9.9% Sputtered film RMS roughness: 0.18 nm Grain size: 10 nm Surface area difference: 0.02% Strength: Quantitative roughness evaluating topography Weakness: small analysis area; no elemental information

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques FE-SEM Results - cleaved cross sections CVD Sputtered CVD film Film thickness: 175 nm Grain size: 50 nm (columnar grains) Sputtered film Thickness: 170 nm Grain size: 10 nm (no columnar structure) Strength: thickness, grain size and structure Weakness: destructive; no elemental information

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques Yield (x 1000) 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 160 Degree RBS 2.275 MeV He ++ RBS data O Si Substrate Si in SiO 2 --- CVD sputtered Si in WSi x Ar*10 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Energy (MeV) W*25 CVD film composition: W-30.5%; Si-69.5% Si/W ratio: 2.28 thickness: 164 nm (assumed density) density: 8.70 g/cm 3 (with FE-SEM thickness) Sputtered film composition: W-27.0%; Si-72.1%; Ar-0.9% Si/W ratio: 2.67 thickness: 153 nm (assumed density) density: 7.53 g/cm 3 (with FE-SEM thickness) Strength: standardless quantitation Weakness: large area

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques 10 22 SIMS Results CVD WSi x Film 10 8 10 22 Sputter WSi x Film 10 8 10 21 Si 10 7 10 21 Si 10 7 10 20 O Cl F 10 6 10 20 O 10 6 Concentration (atoms/cm 3 ) 10 19 10 18 F W H C 10 5 10 4 10 3 Secondary Ion Counts Concentration (atoms/cm 3 ) 10 19 10 18 W C H 10 5 10 4 10 3 Secondary Ion Counts 10 17 10 2 10 17 F 10 2 10 16 10 1 10 16 Cl 10 1 10 15 10 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Depth (microns) 10 15 10 0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Depth (microns)

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques SIMS Results CVD film Cu & Na at WSi x /poly-si O - profile results (units of atoms/cm 3 ) Na Cr Cu CVD 3E15 <3E14* 1E17 Sputtered 1E15 1E15 2E16 Cs + profile results (units of atoms/cm 3 ) C O F Cl CVD 2E17 5E19 3E17 5E19 interface C, F & Cl concentrations higher at WSi x /poly-si interface Sputtered film Na, Cr & Cu at interface, but not in bulk WSi x Only Cr & C at higher concentrations in sputtered film Sputtered 1E19 4E19 <1E16* <1E16* * detection limits for these experiment (not optimized) Strength: sensitivity; bulk/interface contamination Weakness: not a survey tool

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques XPS/ESCA Results Surface Concentration (atomic %) C N O Si W CVD 29 0.8 38 25 6.7 Sputtered 14 <0.1 39 37 9.5 CVD film higher surface C; N bound to C majority of Si bound to O higher oxidation states for W (WO 3, WO 4 ) Sputtered film no N detected above 0.1% elemental Si and Si bound to O present equally more elemental & less oxidized W Strength: quantitative survey, chemical state Weakness: sensitivity, large area, won t detect native Ar + in film

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques AES and EDS Results Auger CVD film Si/W ratio: 2.28 (based on RBS) C, O & F detected on film surface C <0.5%; N, O, F <0.1% below surface Sputtered film Si/W ratio: 2.58 C & O detected on film surface C <0.5%; N, O, F <0.1% below surface EDS Sputtered film Si/W ratio: 2.78 (RBS gives 2.67) ~1% Ar detected (RBS value) Strength: survey; small analysis area Weakness: sensitivity; accuracy of quantitation Strength: sub-surface contaminants, small analysis area; survey Weakness: sensitivity; accuracy of quantitation

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques Total Counts 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 165 TOF-SIMS Results W 184 182 186 WO BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluen) 0 160 180 200 220 240 1400 182 184 186 200 198 202 198 200 202 0 160 180 200 220 240 216 219 CVD film Higher CN, F concentrations Organic antioxidant (BHT, C 15 H 23 O + ) WO 3, WO 4 at higher concentrations Sputtered film Higher surface Na, K concentrations Si containing peaks more intense More elemental W and WO Strength: survey; sensitivity; organic identification Weakness: quantitation

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques TXRF Results Surface Concentration (atoms/cm 2 ) S Cl Ca Ti Cr Fe Cu Zn CVD 2E14 4E13 6E12 <5E10 2E11 2E12 <1E10 2E11 Sputtered 9E13 2E13 7E12 1E13 1E12 2E13 5E12 8E11 Strength: quick, sensitive, surface survey analysis of metals Weakness: large analysis area; cannot detect low Z elements

Practical Applications of Microanalytical Techniques Characteristic Thickness of WSi x layers Film stoichiometry Morphology and roughness Bulk impurities (including atmospherics) Surface composition/ Surface impurities Recommended Methods FE SEM, TEM RBS, AES, XPS FE SEM, AFM >0.5% EDS, AES, XPS, HFS <0.5% SIMS Metallic: TXRF, TOF-SIMS, SurfaceSIMS, XPS, AES Organic: TOF-SIMS, XPS