Solid State LightBurst New PET Technology GE PET/CT and PET/MR

Similar documents
CT-PET calibration : physical principles and operating procedures F.Bonutti. Faustino Bonutti Ph.D. Medical Physics, Udine University Hospital.

Radionuclide Imaging MII Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Introduction to SPECT & PET TBMI02 - Medical Image Analysis 2017

PET. Technical aspects

Study of the feasibility of a compact gamma camera for real-time cancer assessment

Timing and Energy Response of Six Prototype Scintillators

Acknowledgements. PET Fundamentals: Ideal Case. Why Are We Excited About PET/CT? PET Fundamentals: Real Case

Current Challenges and Opportunities in Positron Emission Tomography. Paul Marsden King s College London

Mayneord-Phillips Summer School St Edmund Hall, University of Oxford July Proton decays to n, e +, ν

The Physics of PET/CT scanners

Simulation of triple coincidences in PET

Prospects for achieving < 100 ps FWHM coincidence resolving time in time-of-flight PET

Simultaneous PET/MRI imaging using nanoparticles

Chicago PET Development and

Advances in PET technology

Spin Echo Imaging Sequence

Quantitative Imaging with Y-90 Bremsstrahlung SPECT (Single Positron Emission Computed Tomography)

Using new digital SiPM from Philips with AX-PET a new geometrical concept for PET

Development of Radioactivity Standards for Quantitative Positron Emission Tomography

Chapter 2 PET Imaging Basics

Tomography is imaging by sections. 1

-Ray Applications. J. Gerl GSI. II Andean School on Nuclear Physics October 2014 Bogota, Colombia. presented at. Gamma-Ray - J.

Procesamiento de Imágenes y Bioseñales

Development of a High Precision Axial 3-D PET for Brain Imaging

Detector technology. Aim of this talk. Principle of a radiation detector. Interactions of gamma photons (gas) Gas-filled detectors: examples

What is Albira and How Does the System Work and Why is it Differentiated Technology? Page 1

CHIPP Plenary Meeting University of Geneva, June 12, 2008 W. Lustermann on behalf of the AX PET Collaboration

Biomedical Engineering Image Formation

Technical University of Denmark

Field trip: Tuesday, Feb 5th

III. Proton-therapytherapy. Rome SB - 2/5 1

Radioisotopes and PET

Application of Nuclear Physics

Time-of-Flight PET using Cherenkov Photons Produced in PbF 2

Metal Artifact Reduction and Dose Efficiency Improvement on Photon Counting Detector CT using an Additional Tin Filter

Charge collection in PET detectors

Positron Emission Tomography

What is scintigraphy? The process of obtaining an image or series of sequential images of the distribution of a radionuclide in tissues, organs, or

Development of a new PET detector module with improved Depth of Interaction and Time of Flight capabilities

Dosimetry of patients injected with tracers Ga-68, Zr-89 and Lu-177. Bruno Vanderlinden

Positron Emission Tomography

EL-GY 6813/BE-GY 6203 Medical Imaging, Fall 2016 Final Exam

Positron emission tomography with additional c-ray detectors for multipletracer

Detector. * All clinical images are courtesy of. University, Jerusalem. Ami Altman, Ph.D., and Raz Carmi Ph.D., CT BU, PHILIPS Healthcare

MRI in Review: Simple Steps to Cutting Edge Part I

PET scan simulation. Meysam Dadgar. UMSU, Iran. IFMP, Elbasan, Fig 1: PET camera simulation in gate by cylindrical phantom

Progress towards slice emittance measurements at PITZ. Raffael Niemczyk for the PITZ team, Würzburg, March 20 th 2018

Digital Gamma-ray Spectroscopy & Imaging with Semiconductor detectors Frontiers of gamma-ray spectroscopy

Joint Bayesian Compressed Sensing with Prior Estimate

NMR and MRI : an introduction

Radioisotopes in action. Diagnostic application of radioisotopes. Steps of diagnostic procedure. Information from various medical imaging techniques

Rad Tech 4912 MRI Registry Review. Outline of the Registry Exam: Certification Fees

MEDICAL EQUIPMENT: NUCLEAR MEDICINE. Prof. Yasser Mostafa Kadah

Recent advances and future perspectives of gamma imagers for scintimammography

Introduction to Medical Imaging. Medical Imaging

On Signal to Noise Ratio Tradeoffs in fmri

Laboratory of Radiation Detectors and

arxiv: v1 [physics.ins-det] 22 Dec 2013

Lab 2: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Contrast Mechanisms in MRI. Michael Jay Schillaci

Molecular Imaging:the role of radionuclides techniques

channel system which covers both sides of the laser line. Coverage on both sides of the spectrum allows for

Development of High-Z Semiconductor Detectors and Their Applications to X-ray/gamma-ray Astronomy

Counting Statistics and Error Propagation!

Compton Camera. Compton Camera

Bayesian Estimator for Angle Recovery: Event Classification and Reconstruction in Positron Emission Tomography

Background II. Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) Pulse Sequences Sampling and Trajectories Parallel Imaging. B.Hargreaves - RAD 229.

The relationship between image noise and spatial resolution of CT scanners

Lecture k-space. k-space illustrations. Zeugmatography 3/7/2011. Use of gradients to make an image echo. K-space Intro to k-space sampling

Lecture 5: Tomographic nuclear systems: SPECT

X. Allen Li. Disclosure. DECT: What, how and Why Why dual-energy CT (DECT)? 7/30/2018. Improving delineation and response assessment using DECT in RT

Compton Camera with PositionSensitive Silicon Detectors

7.3.A. The expression for signal recovery is similar to that derived under exercise 7.2 and is given by:

Scan Time Optimization for Post-injection PET Scans

Readout of LYSO using a new silicon photodetector for positron emission tomography

Multi-Energy CT: Principles, Processing

Detector R&D at KIPAC. Hiro Tajima Kavli InStitute of Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology

Student Projects for

6: Positron Emission Tomography

Non-invasive Measurement of Pressure Gradients in Pulsatile Flow using Ultrasound

Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics

Sub-Nanosecond Timing for In-Beam PET in hadrontherapy

Physics. Sunday, March 4, :30 a.m. 10:00 a.m.

PET/MRI Principle, History, and Perspective. Main Imaging Techniques. X-ray Tube. History of X-ray & CT. How to Look inside the Human Body

Supplementary Figure 1 Analysis of beige fat and cells and characteristics of exosome release, related to Figure 1

Energy resolution and absolute detection efficiency for LSO crystals: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulation and experimental data

Stellar Intensity Interferometric Capabilities of IACT Arrays*

EXPERIMENTAL DETERMINATION OF SHIELDING REQUIREMENTS FOR PET MEDICAL FACILITIES BRADLEY S. BRINKLEY

Silicon Drift Detectors for gamma-ray detection: 15 years of research (and collaboration between Politecnico and INAF-Milano)

A. I, II, and III B. I C. I and II D. II and III E. I and III

(INCLUDING THIS FRONT PAGE)

The EDM Polarimeter Development at COSY-Jülich

Navigator Echoes. BioE 594 Advanced Topics in MRI Mauli. M. Modi. BioE /18/ What are Navigator Echoes?

Positron Emission Tomography (PET)

Technical University of Denmark

AN NONNEGATIVELY CONSTRAINED ITERATIVE METHOD FOR POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY. Johnathan M. Bardsley

The Versatile Array of Neutron Detectors at Low Energy

Detector R&D in KAPAC

Objective Functions for Tomographic Reconstruction from. Randoms-Precorrected PET Scans. gram separately, this process doubles the storage space for

Design of a Lanthanum Bromide Detector for TOF PET

Transcription:

Solid State LightBurst New PET Technology GE PET/CT and PET/MR Osama Mawlawi PhD. Dept. of Imaging Physics MD Anderson Cancer Center Disclosures SIEMENS Research grant GE research grant Discovery MI LYSO TOF capable 385 ps (6 cm positioning error) PSF Regularized reconstruction SSPM detectors Modular 10, 15, 20, 25 cm 70 cm transverse FOV Water cooled 1

New GE Signa PET/MR PET LYSO TOF capable ~ 385 ps (6 cm positioning error) PSF Regularized reconstruction SSPM 25 cm axial FOV 60 cm transverse FOV 3 T MRI (MR750W) 60 cm bore w/ 50cm FOV Multi-drive XMIT with 32 ch + 33 T/m & 120 T/m/s gradient strength Time-of-Flight Acquisition: t x c 2 C = 3*10 8 m/s Back projection along the LOR Time of Flight and SNR, examples t x c 2 Time Resolution (ns) x (cm) SNR D x TOF SNR conv SNR SNR improvement improvement (20 cm object) (40 cm object) 0.1 1.5 3.7 5.2 0.3 4.5 2.1 3.0 0.5 7.5 1.6 2.3 1.2 18.0 1.1 1.5 Mawlawi MDACC 2

Resolution Recovery Mawlawi MDACC Resolution Recovery Mawlawi MDACC 70 Kg, 280 MBq, 2.5 min/bed, 104 min post admin VOI 1 VOI 2 3D-IR 3D-IR + RR 3D-IR+TOF+RR VOI 3 SUV VOI 1: 3.1 4.3 5.6 SUV VOI 2: 1.8 2.4 3.7 SUV VOI 3: 1.2 2.1 4.0 Courtesy of D. Townsend 3

Contrast recovery 8/2/2017 Regularized Reconstruction Technology Data statistics (likelihood) General OSEM Regularization x arg max n d i x 0 i 1 y log v Px i Px i n jk j 1 k N j ( x x ) j k Weighting term to modulate the strength of the regularization term Small pixel differences Regularization favors this image Big pixel differences Regularization avoids this image Adapted from GE HealthCare Regularized Reconsturction Regularized Reconstruction Low noise and accurate SUV TOF+PSF 25 iterations TOF+PSF 2 iterations Noisy results but accurate SUV Low noise but less accurate SUV Image Noise Achieve full convergence at low image noise Adapted from GE HealthCare Regularized Reconstruction = Q-Clear MIP Images PSF TOF+PSF QC+PSF QC+TOF+PSF 77 years male with follicular lymphoma, 80 kg, 25 BMI, 9.4 mci, 60 min post injection 4

Regularized Reconstruction = Q-Clear A B C D Q-Clear+ToF+PSF OSEM+ToF+PSF Q-Clear+PSF OSEM+PSF Left to right: PET MIP images of a patient (BMI=26) with algorithms A, B, C, and D. Arrows highlighting lesion conspicuity (red). All images are displayed with the same WW/WL settings. Detector block 34 modules 70 cm 9x5=45; total slices is 2n-1= 89 4x3 optical block. The light from those crystals is directed towards a single SiPM chip. What s hard to see in the figure is that the chip is a hex device, with 3x2 operationally independent devices on it. So the light encoding is 12 crystals to 6 SiPM channels. picture shows twelve blocks, or an assembly of 16x9 crystals, that is nominally 64x48 mm in size. PET/(MR) PET Detector Small Compact MR compatible 5

Resolution Center Position Resolution Quarter FOV Position Resolution Results Test Expected mm FWHM Measured Pass / Fail Transverse @ 1 cm <= 4.5 4.2 Pass Axial @ 1 cm <= 6.5 6.0 Pass Radial @ 10 cm <= 5.9 5.8 Pass Tangential @ 10 cm <= 4.6 4.4 Pass Axial @ 10 cm <= 7.4 7.1 Pass 6

Sensitivity Sensitivity Center FOV 1 st Run Expected Run 1 cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 10cm Average >= 21.0 Pass/Fail Sensitivity 10 cm 1 st Run Expected Run 1 cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 10cm 19.7 Average >= 21.0 20.0 Pass/Fail FAIL 7

Sensitivity Center FOV 2 nd Run Expected Run 1 Run 2 cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 21.0 10cm 19.7 Average >= 21.0 20.0 Pass/Fail FAIL Sensitivity 10 cm 2 nd Run Expected Run 1 Run 2 cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 21.0 10cm 19.7 20.3 Average >= 21.0 20.0 20.7 Pass/Fail FAIL FAIL Sensitivity Center FOV 3 rd Run Expected Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 21.0 20.4 10cm 19.7 20.3 Average >= 21.0 20.0 20.7 Pass/Fail FAIL FAIL 8

Sensitivity 10 cm 3 rd Run Expected Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 21.0 20.4 10cm 19.7 20.3 19.9 Average >= 21.0 20.0 20.7 20.2 Pass/Fail FAIL FAIL FAIL Sensitivity Center FOV 4 th Run Expected Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 21.0 20.4 20.8 10cm 19.7 20.3 19.9 Average >= 21.0 20.0 20.7 20.2 Pass/Fail FAIL FAIL FAIL Sensitivity 10 cm 4 th Run Expected Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq cps/kbq 0cm 20.3 21.0 20.4 20.8 10cm 19.7 20.3 19.9 20.1 Average >= 21.0 20.0 20.7 20.2 20.4 Pass/Fail FAIL FAIL FAIL FAIL 9

Count rate Expected Measured P/F Peak NECR >= 210 kcps 211 Pass NECR @ 17.5 kbq/ml >= 210 kcps 210 Pass NECR @ 30.0 kbq/ml >= 175 kcps 191 Pass Count rate @ 17 kbq/cc Expected Measured P/F Peak NECR >= 210 kcps 211 Pass NECR @ 17.5 kbq/ml >= 210 kcps 210 Pass NECR @ 30.0 kbq/ml >= 175 kcps 191 Pass Count rate @ 30 kbq/cc Expected Measured P/F Peak NECR >= 210 kcps 211 Pass NECR @ 17.5 kbq/ml >= 210 kcps 210 Pass NECR @ 30.0 kbq/ml >= 175 kcps 191 Pass 10

Scatter Fraction Scatter Fraction @ Peak NECR Expected Measured P/F <=45 % 44 Pass PET NEMA (NU 2-2007) measurements MR on and off 710 (15.7 mct (21.6 cm) PET Performance Metric MR Off MR On Delta (%) MDA cm) STD (Hi-Res) Spatial Resolution FWHM (mm): @ 1 cm Transverse 4.2 (0.1)* 4.2 (0.1) 0.0% 4.2 5.4 6.5 (4.7) @ 1 cm Axial 5.7 (0.3) 5.7 (0.3) 0.0% 6.0 6.2 6 (4.8) @ 10 cm - Radial 5.8 (0.0) 5.8 (0.0) 0.0% 5.8 6.3 6.5 (5.2) @ 10 cm Tangential 4.4 (0.0) 4.4 (0.0) 0.0% 4.4 5.8 6.5 (5.2) @ 10 cm - Axial 7.0 (0.1) 7.0 (0.1) 0.0% 7.1 6.9 6.5 (6.2) Peak NECR (kcps) 218 (0.6) 215 (5.5) -1.5% 211 115 155 Scatter Fraction @ Peak NECR (%) 43.6 (0.3) 42.5 (0.6) -2.6% 43.6 41 40 Sensitivity (cps/kbq) 22.9 (0.9) 22.5 (0.8) -1.9% 20.3 6.75 8.5 Energy resolution (%) 10.3 10.5 1.9% ~10 ~10 Timing resolution (psec) 382 393 2.6% ~550 ~500 Levin et al, Performance of a high sensitivity time-of-flight PET ring operating *Error estimate is standard deviation simultaneously within a 3T MR system, PSMR Conference, Kos, Greece 2014 of three measurements at different sites Results from a prototype system Discovery MI 5 rings PET/MR 11

MI 5 rings MI 5 rings PET/MR MI 4 rings Accuracy Count Rate Accuracy Expected Measured Pass/Fail Max Error Below NECR <= 5 % 3% PASS NEMA IEC Body Phantom 12

IQ Run1 Contrast Recovery Expected Run 1 P/F >= 30 % 58 P 10 mm 13 mm >= 35 % 66 P 17 mm >= 45 % 85 P 22 mm >= 55 % 87 P 28 mm >= 65 % 92 P 37 mm >= 70 % 93 P Background Variability 10 mm <= 10 % 7 P 13 mm <= 9 % 6 P 17 mm <= 8 % 6 P 22 mm <= 7 % 6 P 28 mm <= 6 % 6 P 37 mm <= 5 % 7 Fail Lung Error <= 10 % 5 P IQ Run2 Contrast Recovery Expected Run 1 P/F Run 2 P/F 10 mm >= 30 % 58 P 62 P 13 mm >= 35 % 66 P 77 P 17 mm >= 45 % 85 P 85 P 22 mm >= 55 % 87 P 91 P 28 mm >= 65 % 92 P 92 P 37 mm >= 70 % 93 P 93 P Background Variability 10 mm <= 10 % 7 P 8 P 13 mm <= 9 % 6 P 7 P 17 mm <= 8 % 6 P 6 P 22 mm <= 7 % 6 P 6 P 28 mm <= 6 % 6 P 6 P 37 mm <= 5 % 7 Fail 6 Fail Lung Error <= 10 % 5 P 5 P UP TO 26 CM AXIAL FIELD-OF-VIEW Courtesy of GE 13

43 8/2/2017 PET/MR 4.8 mci FDG 30min PET/MR (80min Post Injection) *Courtesy University of Zurich ½ T I M E, N O C O M P R O M I S E Full acquisition time 12 min ½ acquisition time 6 min Full acquisition time 12 min ½ acquisition time 6 min SUVmax: 7.45 Liver SUVmean: 2.07 SUVmax: 7.53 Liver SUVmean: 2.01 DISCOVERY MI sensitivity and LightBurst Digital detector provide reliable and consistent image quality, resolution and quantitative accuracy. With Discovery MI, research center will be able to free up scanner time for their research study without impact their daily clinical workload. Courtesy Stanford University, A. Iagaru, MD E X C E L L E N T I M A G E Q U A L I T Y A N D C L I N I C A L R E S O L U T I O N DISCOVERY MI sensitivity and 20cm Axial Field of View LightBurst Digital detector provide the ability to perform fast 2 meter scans without sacrificing image quality or resolution and improve patient comfort with shorter scan times. A c q u i s i t i o n 2 0 m i n u t e s 383 M B q / 1 0. 3 5 m C i F D G 9 6 m i n u t e u p t a k e P a t i e n t H i s t o r y P a t i e n t r e f e r r e d t o P E T / C T f o r R e s t a g i n g o f M a n t l e C e l l N o n - H o d g k i n s L y m p h o m a P a t i e n t B M I 2 8. 4 Courtesy Stanford University, A. Iagaru, MD Liver SUVmean: 2.22 g/ml Liver Noise (STD): 0.17 g/ml 14

S M A L L L E S I O N D E T E C TA B I L I T Y LightBurst Digital Conventional PET LightBurst Digital Conventional PET SUVmax: 7.4 SUVmax: 3.7 DISCOVERY MI sensitivity and LightBurst Digital detector provide improvement in small lesion detectability giving you increased confidence in your communications to referring physicians. Courtesy Stanford University, A. Iagaru, MD E X C E L L E N T I M A G E Q U A L I T Y A N D C L I N I C A L R E S O L U T I O N DISCOVERY MI sensitivity and volumetric resolution provide small lesion detectability for small bone lesions. A c q u i s i t i o n 2 5 m i n u t e s 270 M B q / 7. 3 m C i 18F-NaF 1 1 3 m i n u t e u p t a k e P a t i e n t H i s t o r y P a t i e n t w i t h h i s t o r y o f P r o s t a t e c a n c e r r e f e r r e d t o P E T / C T f o r H i s t o r y o f p r o s t a t e c a n c e r w i t h n e w b o n e p a i n. E v a l u a t i o n o f m e t a s t a t i c d i s e a s e. P a t i e n t B M I 2 7. 4 Courtesy Stanford University, A. Iagaru, MD PET Radiopharmaceutical may not be approved by ministers of health in all regions C O N T R A S T A N D R E S O L U T I O N F O R A L L P E T T R A C E R S A c q u i s i t i o n 196 M B q / 5. 3 m C i F D G 6 7 m i n u t e u p t a k e P a t i e n t H i s t o r y Patient referred to PET/CT for evaluation of Alzheimer s diseases Low noise imaging demonstrate excellent image quality Courtesy PET Center Uppsala 15

C O N T R A S T A N D R E S O L U T I O N F O R A L L P E T T R A C E R S Ga-68 DOTATATE Left - 6 mci / 222 MBq Injection - 78 min uptake - 2.6mCi / 96 MBq at Scan Time Right - 6.7 mci / 248 MBq Injection - 104 min uptake - 2.2 mci / 81 MBq at scan time Courtesy Stanford University, A. Iagaru, MD PET Radiopharmaceutical may not be approved by ministers of health in all regions Low noise imaging demonstrate excellent image Quality Excellent image quality and small lesions detectability Thank You Courtesy of University of Zurich 16