Surface Roughness - Standards and Uncertainty R. Krüger-Sehm and L. Koenders

Similar documents
Calibration of measuring instruments and standards for roughness measuring technique

Guideline DKD-R 4-2. Sheet 3. Edition 7/2011.

Appendix B1. Reports of SMU

T.V. Vorburger, J.F. Song, T.B. Renegar, and A. Zheng January 23, 2008

ENG56 DriveTrain. Good practice guide. for surface parameter measurement strategies for form and diameter measurements for large bearings

TRACEABILITY STRATEGIES FOR THE CALIBRATION OF GEAR AND SPLINE ARTEFACTS

Bilateral comparison on micro-cmm artefacts. between PTB and METAS. Final report

UNCERTAINTY SCOPE OF THE FORCE CALIBRATION MACHINES. A. Sawla Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Bundesallee 100, D Braunschweig, Germany

Uncertainty of the Measurement of Radial Runout, Axial Runout and Coning using an Industrial Axi-Symmetric Measurement Machine

INVESTIGATION OF THE CALIBRATION CAPABILITIES OF A 1 KN M AND 10 KN M REFERENCE CALIBRATION MACHINE

Technical Protocol of the CIPM Key Comparison CCAUV.V-K5

This annex is valid from: to Replaces annex dated: Location(s) where activities are performed under accreditation

Available online at ScienceDirect. Andrej Godina*, Bojan Acko

ESTIMATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN HARDNESS MEASUREMENT OF RUBBER AND OTHER ELASTOPLASTIC MATERIALS

Metrological Characterization of a Primary Vickers Hardness Standard Machine - NIS Egypt

INVESTIGATION OF TRANSFER STANDARDS IN THE HIGHEST RANGE UP TO 50 MN WITHIN EMRP PROJECT SIB 63 Falk Tegtmeier 1, Michael Wagner 2, Rolf Kumme 3

Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt

Technical Protocol of the Bilateral Comparison in Primary Angular Vibration Calibration CCAUV.V-S1

Traceability of on-machine measurements under a wide range of working conditions

Certification of a High Capacity Force Machine for Testing of Load Cells According to OIML R60

University of Huddersfield Repository

MEMS Metrology. Prof. Tianhong Cui ME 8254

DEVELOPMENT OF CALIBRATION METHODS FOR THE NANOINDENTATION TEST

High Precision Dimensional Metrology of Periodic Nanostructures using Laser Scatterometry

Final Report On COOMET Vickers PTB/VNIIFTRI Key Comparison (COOMET.M.H- K1.b and COOMET.M.H- K1.c)

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Renewal of the gage-block interferometer at INRIM

Know Your Uncertainty

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Metallic materials Vickers hardness test Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks

Comparison of Results Obtained from Calibration of a Measuring Arm Performed According to the VDI/VDE, ASME and ISO Standards

Achieving traceability of industrial computed tomography

JAB NOTE4. ESTIMATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY (Electrical Testing / High Power Testing) Japan Accreditation Board (JAB)

Metallic materials Brinell hardness test. Part 3: Calibration of reference blocks

Final Report On RMO VICKERS KEY COMPARISON COOMET M.H-K1

A New Calibration Method for Ultrasonic Clamp-on Flowmeters

PTB S 16.5 MN HYDRAULIC AMPLIFICATION MACHINE AFTER MODERNIZATION

A laser metroscope for the calibration of setting rings

A Comprehensive Overview of the Laser Based Calibration Facility at Measurement Standards Laboratory

POWER QUALITY MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE. Version 4 October Power-Quality-Oct-2009-Version-4.doc Page 1 / 12

Uncertainties associated with the use of a sound level meter

T e c h n i c a l L e x i c o n

EA-10/14. EA Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices. Publication Reference PURPOSE

EVALUATION OF THE UNCERTAINTY IN THE REALIZATION OF THE PLTS-2000 AT NMi

AFRIMETS. Supplementary Comparison Programme. Calibration of Gauge Blocks. by Mechanical Comparison Method AFRIMETS.L S3.

Uncertainty and its Impact on the Quality of Measurement

nano-ta: Nano Thermal Analysis

Nanometrology and its role in the development of nanotechnology

Establishing traceability and estimating measurement uncertainty in physical, chemical and biological measurements

SIM Regional Comparison on. The Calibration of Internal and External Diameter Standards SIM.L-K FINAL REPORT July 2012

Guidelines on the Calibration of Static Torque Measuring Devices

The dimensional calibration of piston-cylinder units to be used for pressure metrology and the re-determination of the Boltzmann constant

Measurement Uncertainty Principles and Implementation in QC

METHODS TO CONFIRM THE MEASUREMENT CAPABILITY OF THE FORCE STANDARD MACHINES AFTER REINSTALLATION

Project 887 Force Uncertainty Guide. Andy Knott, NPL EUROMET TC-M Lensbury, Teddington, United Kingdom 1 March 2007

CHAPTER 3 EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF INTERFACE BEHAVIOR BETWEEN COMPOSITE PILES AND TWO SANDS

Scanning Probe Microscopy. EMSE-515 F. Ernst

Vocabulary of Metrology

FORCE STANDARDS COMPARISON BETWEEN PTB (GERMANY) AND CENAM (MEXICO).

An international comparison of surface texture parameters quantification on polymer artefacts using optical instruments

Uncertainty sources of reference measurement procedures for enzymes

EFFECT OF FEED RATE ON THE GENERATION OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS IN TURNING

INFLUENCE OF TOOL NOSE RADIUS ON THE CUTTING PERFORMANCE AND SURFACE FINISH DURING HARD TURNING WITH CBN CUTTING TOOLS 1.

Since the publication of the ISO Guide to the Expression

Modeling Measurement Uncertainty in Room Acoustics P. Dietrich

XUV 773: X-Ray Fluorescence Analysis of Gemstones

Withdrawn at December 31, Guideline DKD-R 5-7. Calibration of Climatic Chambers DEUTSCHER KALIBRIERDIENST

The PUMA method applied to the measures carried out by using a PC-based measurement instrument. Ciro Spataro

Analysis of shock force measurements for the model based dynamic calibration

MetroPro TM Surface Texture Parameters

Reproducibility within the Laboratory R w Control Sample Covering the Whole Analytical Process

The Fundamentals of Moisture Calibration

< Final report > Report on the APMP.M.F-S1 supplementary comparison for 2 MN Force

Report on Key Comparison COOMET.AUV.A-K5: Pressure calibration of laboratory standard microphones in the frequency range 2 Hz to 10 khz

INFLUENCE OF GROWTH INTERRUPTION ON THE FORMATION OF SOLID-STATE INTERFACES

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Metallic materials Knoop hardness test Part 1: Test method

Urban Legends in Gasmetering

Uncertainty of Calibration. Results in Force Measurements

Robust and Miniaturized Interferometric Distance Sensor for In-Situ Turning Process Monitoring

WRINGING DEFORMATION AND ROUGHNESS ASPECTS IN OPTICAL LENGTH MEASUREMENTS

Measurement uncertainty revisited Alternative approaches to uncertainty evaluation

AM Metrology at NPL. Stephen Brown. Tuesday 8 th December 2015

Measurement Uncertainty, March 2009, F. Cordeiro 1

SHENZHEN SEM.TEST TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. 1/F, BUILDING A, HONGWEI INDUSTRIAL PARK, LIUXIAN 2ND ROAD BAO'AN DISTRICT SHENZHEN (518101), CHINA

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

Revision of EN Wheel roughness measurements

TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION DURING CMM INSPECTION

Science of Stability 2017

Calibration of Surface Contamination Monitors. UKAS Accredited Organisations Comparison. Final Report

CHAPTER 9 PERFORMANCE OF THE INTERFEROMETER

Integrated Bayesian Experimental Design

Measurement of airflow resistance by the alternating flow method

Commissioning of the Beta Secondary Standard (BSS2)

Interferometric determination of thermal expansion coefficient of piston/cylinder unit preliminary investigation

+ + ( indicator ) + (display, printer, memory)

Metrological Characterization of Hardness Indenter Calibration System

Introductory guide to measuring the mechanical properties of nanoobjects/particles

Recent Developments in Standards for Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability (An Overview of ISO and US Uncertainty Activities) CMM Seminar

MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY PREPARED FOR ENAO ASSESSOR CALIBRATION COURSE OCTOBER/NOVEMBER Prepared by MJ Mc Nerney for ENAO Assessor Calibration

Intercomparison of Measurements of the Thermophysical Properties of Polymethyl Methacrylate 1

A Unified Approach to Uncertainty for Quality Improvement

Transcription:

Surface Roughness - Standards and Uncertainty R. Krüger-Sehm and L. Koenders Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany

Surfaces Generation - Grinding - Honing - Lapping Characterisation - Measurement - Visualisation - Quantification Function -Gloss - Paintability - Wear

Diamond turned Al surface different scales Nomarski picture 3D picture of the AFM data obtained near the centre Picture showing the grooves and some contamination

Diagram Wavelength vs. Amplitude - Instruments 100 µm 10 µm SEM Confocal microscope Amplitude 1 µm Light scattering (vis) 100 nm 10 nm SPM Interference microscope Stylus instrument 1 nm 100 pm 10 nm 100 nm 1 µm 10 µm 100 µm 1 mm 10 mm Wavelength

Instruments, Specimens and Procedures Surface Measurement Standards Guidelines Specification Calibration Evaluation Verification Standards Surface Measurement Instruments

Standards for Roughness Measurement ISO 14 638 Geometrical product specifications(gps) matrix model ISO 5436-1 Standard specimen ISO 5436- Software standards ISO 487 Definition of surface-parameters ISO 488 Surface properties stylus instruments rules and conditions ISO 1156 Characteristics of Gauß filter ISO 491 Characteristics of RC filter ISO 374 Stylus instruments definitions ISO 1179 Calibration of stylus instruments ISO 13565-1 ISO 13565- EN 10049 Filter-definition for Rk parameters Definition of Rk parameters Measurement of Ra and RPc on metallic flat products with stochastic surface texture (skidded stylus) EAL-G-0 Calibration of stylus instruments for measuring surface roughness

Diagram Wavelength vs Amplitude - Standards

Dissemination of Units by Calibration Standards Pt, D Measurement standards ISO type A Ra, Rz, Rsm,... Ra, Rz, Rq,... Traceable Interference Microscope PTB C D1, D Guidelines to support traceability established e.g. EAL G0, ISO1179 draft in VDIcommittee Stylus Instrument PTB PTB Industry Interference Microscope Stylus Instrument

Contact Stylus Instrument (ISO 374), Specifications Alternative setup ze(x) stylus tip transducer traced profile feed unit z y x settings parameters profile topography z0(x) instrument reference profile l s- Filter l c- Filter amplifier A/Dconv. parameter zg(x) zs(x) zc(x) Feature usual typical usual Lateral measuring range 0 mm 50...10 mm 300 mm Vertical measuring range 0.3 µm 60 µm 1mm Vertical resolution 16 bit Straightness deviation @ 50 mm (Wt 0 ) 0 nm 50 nm 100 nm Noise amplitude @ λc = 0,8 mm (Rz 0 ) 1 nm 0 nm 30 nm Tip radius 0.1 µm... 5 µm 5 µm

Special Remarks ISO 374: The primary profile contains the influence from the stylus. Further calculations do not describe the real surface, but a morphological changed one. ISO 488: The waviness cutoff-wavelength depends on the surface specifications. In roundness and straightness measurement the separation wavelength is fixed to 0,8 mm(rsp equivalent wave numbers). This must be observed in case of calculating the influence of the measured roughness in form measurement. ISO 374: Applicable for stylus instruments with datum (plane). ISO 1179 allows secondary measuring systems. Practical result: standardisation of metal sheet measurement with skidded stylus systems in SEP 1940, rsp. pren 10049.

Measurement Conditions Periodic profiles RSm in mm Stochastic profiles Ra in µm Stochastic profiles Rz in µm Sampling length l r in mm evaluation length l n in mm Cutoff λ c in mm short wavelength λ s in µm Bandwidth B max. tip radius r tip in μm max. sampl interval in µm >0.013..0.04 >(0.006).0.0 >(0.05)..0.1 0.08 0.4 0.08.5 30 0.5 >0.04..0.13 >0.0..0.1 >0.1..0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5.5 100 0.5 >0.13..0.4 >0.1.. >0.5..10 0.8 4 0.8.5 300 (5) 0.5 >0.4..1.3 >..10 >10..50.5 1.5.5 8 300 5 1.5 >1.3..4 >10..80 >50..00 8 40 8 5 300 10 5 Excerpt of Standards: ISO 374 (1996) ISO 487 (1997) ISO 488 (1996) ISO 1156 (1996)

Calibration of Devices Aim, result Sample/Standard To do Noise of instrument Flat glass Determination of Rz 0, Ra 0,... Straightness deviation of the Flat glass Determination of Wt 0 datum Control/correction of vertical Certified depth setting Determination of Pt n, D n for axis/amplification standard position c ; Repeatability of probing Certified depth setting standard comparison with certified value n repetitions of Pt at the same position Quality management: Calibration have to be done periodically and have to be documented!

Depth Setting Standards (1) Depth measurement standards Type A according to ISO 5436-1 Nominal values of grooves from 0 nm to 10 µm Lateral width from µm to 100 µm Roughness on measurement areas down to 1 nm Uncertainty (k=) between 3 nm and 5 nm 1 5 6 Pt depth of profile D groove depth 3 4 roughness depth roughness width

Depth Setting Standards () Substrate: Ø ~ 50 mm, 10 mm thick Ni-P on Ni, Hardness ~ 580 HV Grooves ~ 0.4 µm to 75 µm Width at groove ground 100 µm to 00 µm

Depth Setting Standards (3) Depth measurement standards Type A1 according to ISO 5436-1 Nominal values of grooves between 1 µm and 5 mm Lateral sizes between 100 µm and 1mm Roughness on measurement areas about Rz = 0 nm Traceability to length unit by stylus instrument traced back by gauge block, traced back by interferometric calibration Uncertainty (k=) between 5 nm and 60 nm

Lateral calibration standard Design For λc/mm 8,5 0,8 0,5 0,08 Image: Dark field 0 µm (x) Feature Typical value Geometric (type C) Depth(Rz1max) 1,..., 10 µm Period lateral (RSm) 80,..., 50 µm λc 50 µm; 0.8 mm;.5 mm Lateral standard (type C) Depth 5 µm Period lateral (RSm) 5, 100, 50, 1000, 500 µm for λc 80, 50, 800, 500, 8000 µm 50 µm 50 µm 4x 4x 4x Measurement scheme start on reference plane

Roughness Standard Specimen

Geometrical Calibration Standard (Type C) Feature Typical value Geometric (type C) Depth(Rz1max) 1,...,10 µm Period lateral (RSm) 80,..., 50 µm λc 50 µm; 0,8 mm;.5 mm Profil of geometrical standard

Roughness Calibration Standards, Specifications Feature typical Rz 1... 0 µm Ra 0.16... 3 µm λc 0.8 mm;.5 mm Profile repetition 4 mm

Roughness - Standards, Measurement Schemes Meßstellenplan für PTB-Rauhnormale (g, m, f), λc = 0,8 mm Startpunkte der Meßstrecken in mm von Startlinie Rauhnormal starting points of the evaluation lengths in mm from the starting line Maßstab 5:1 scale 5:1 3.0 μm.0 1.0 PTB Mess- richtung 0.55 4.6 8.65 1.7 0.3 4.35 8.4 1.5 0 4.1 8.15 1. 3 mm 3 mm Mittellinie symmetry line 0.0-1.0 Startlinie starting line Mess- -.0 Meßstellenplan für PTB-Rauhnormale (gg), λc=,5 mm Startpunkte der Meßstrecken in mm von Startlinie -3.0 starting points of the evaluation lengths in mm from the starting line 0.0 1.0.0 3.0 4.0 mm 5.0 Maßstab 5:1 scale 5:1 Same scale (1,5 mm) PTB richtung 0,0 mm (11x) 0,50 mm (11x) Mittellinie symmetry line Startlinie starting line

Super fine roughness standards Roughness measurement standard Type D according to ISO 5436-1 Nominal values of Rz = {150, 300, 450} nm, expressed in Ra between Ra = 5 nm and 80 nm Manufacturing by single diamond turning of digital generated profile amplitude and shape of profile predictable profile repetition length 1,5 mm, For λc = 0,5 mm Calibration with contact stylus instrument, traced back by depth measurement standard Uncertainty of calibration (k=) ~ 6 % and 8 %, Approved in Round Robin of 11 DKD-laboratories Useable for calibration of interference microscopes, for calibration and verification

Nano-Roughness-Standards & Specifications - Scan range < 100 µm => λc - x-y Scans => use of pictures - Tip shape => λs - data points < 4000 => λs -1-dim Profil - Profile Repetition 5*40 µm - Measuring length 40 µm for 5 nm < Ra < 0 nm

Roughness measurement Calibration Verification Aim, result Used standard To Do Noise of device Flat glass Determination of Rz 0, Ra 0,... Control or correction of the vertical axis/amplification Certified depth setting standard Determination of Pt n, D n for position c, Comparison with certified value Selection of waviness filter Determination of roughness Estimation of measurement uncertainty Roughness standard to be calibrated Roughness standard to be calibrated Determination of Ra, Rz with λc=0,8 mm Using ISO 888 (DIN 4768) to select λc Measurement plan; determination of roughness parameters and standard deviation Calculation following the rules of GUM and related guides

Model of Uncertainty of Roughness Parameter uncertainty of parameter value u(k) Parameter calculation P uncertainty of roughness profil K = P λc-filter function Fc uncertainty of primary profil {Fc λs-filter function Fs uncertainty of total profil Instrument function G Surface profile [Fs (G (z e (x)) ]}

Instrument-Function of Stylus Instrument ze(x) stylus tip transducer traced profile feed unit z y x settings parameters profile topography z0(x) instrument reference profile l s- Filter l c- Filter amplifier A/Dconv. parameter zg(x) zs(x) zc(x) z g (x) = C [z e (x) + z ref (x) + z 0 (x) + z pl (x)+z sp (x)] where C Calibration factor z 0 Noise of instrument z e Contacted profile z pl Plastic deformation of surface z g Total profile z sp Profile deviation by tip radius dev z ref Profile of reference plane

Uncertainty Budget (1) Model for stylus instruments z g (x) = C [z e (x) + z ref (x) + z 0 (x) + z pl (x)+z sp (x)] = C z u (x) where C Calibration factor z u uncalibrated profile Using the product rule u (z g ) = u (C) z u + C u (z u ) with with C = Pt m /Pt n C = D m /D n where where Pt m value measured D m value measured Pt n value certified D n value certified

Evaluation of Depth Setting Standards 1 5 6 1 5 6 Pt depth of profile D groove depth 3 4 roughness depth roughness Pt depth of profile D groove depth fitting parabola 3 4 roughness depth roughness width width Evaluation of type A1 and type A depth setting standard, influence of roughness A A1: Reference line @ levelling 1 A: Reference line @ levelling A:Levelling deviation Pt1: Pt @ levelling 1 Pt: Pt @ levelling Influence of levelling

Uncertainty Budget () Using the product rule u (z g ) = u (C) z u(x) + C u (z u ) with C = Pt m /Pt n where Pt m value measured Pt n value certified Each value is uncertain u (Pt m ), u (Pt n ) u (C) = 1/Pt 4 m [Pt n u (Pt m ) + Pt m u (Pt n )] With a calibrated instruments Pt n Pt m (C ~ 1) u (C) = 1/Pt m [u (Pt m ) + u (Pt n )] u (C) z u = 1/Pt m [u (Pt m ) + u (Pt n )] If the depth of the standard is close to the value of the sample to be measured z u /Pt Model for this value m ~ 1 u (C) z u = u (Pt m ) + u Calibration certificate (Pt n ) u (z g ) = u (Pt m ) + u (Pt n ) + u (z u )

Uncertainty Budget (3) Model for Pt Track n Track m Pt m is not measured at the same position as the groove is calibrated. - value of the standard at right track - gradient of the standard Pt/ y - repeatability of the instrument b Pt m = Pt n + Pt + b u (Pt m ) = u (Pt n )+ u ( Pt) + u (b ) 1 U n 4 1 3 ( a ) y G s ( Pt n )

Uncertainty Budget (4) Effect of λs Measured profile has uncorrelated points. Due to filtering the points are correlated! The effect of filtering can be expressed by a factor f s [Krystek] u(z f ) = f s u(z unf ) f s = Δx/(α λ s ) where α = log()/π Table for factor f s λ s in µm Δx in µm f s.5 0.5 0.55 8 1.5 0.53 8 0.5 0.31 Krystek Measurement uncertainty propagation in the case of filtering in roughness measurement 001 Meas. Sci. Technol. 1 63

Uncertainty Budget (5) Effect of λc Similar to λs. The effect of filtering can be expressed by a factor f s [Krystek] u(w) = f c u(z s ) f c = Δx/(α λ c ) Where α = log()/π However, λc is much more larger than Δx since the uncertainty of the filtered is nearly similar to those of the unfiltered. Table for factor f c λ c in µm Δx in µm f c 50 0.5 0.055 800 0.5 0.031 500 1.5 0.017 z c = z s w u (z c ) = u (z s ) + u (w) u (z c ) = u (z s ) + f c u(z s ) Krystek Measurement uncertainty propagation in the case of filtering in roughness measurement 001 Meas. Sci. Technol. 1 63

Uncertainty Budget (6) Effect of parameter function K The uncertainty of the parameter K depends on the algorithm. By the algorithm for K the uncertainty may be different to those of the single point. It is described as a smoothing factor S since the uncertainty is reduced in most cases. Example: u sys (Rz) = S(Rz) * u(z g ) Here S(Rz) is the smoothing factor! using

Uncertainty Budget (7) z u (x) = z e (x) + z ref (x) + z 0 (x) + z pl (x)+z sp (x) u (z u ) = u (z e ) + u (z ref ) + u (z 0 ) + u (z pl ) + u (z sp ) where u (z e ) u (z ref ) u (z 0 ) u (z pl ) u (z sp ) uncertainty of probed profile uncertainty of reference profile uncertainty due to noise of 1 s ( Rz) S n Wt 0 1 1 1 Rz 0 S 1 instrument ( ) uncertainty due to plastic deformation uncertainty due to unknown tip shape 1 3 1 S a pl 3 0nm u( r μm ) sp S is smoothing factor of parameter

Uncertainty of Points of Profile (1) Example for a roughness standard of type D with Rz 3 µm Ch. Input quantity keyword Determined by Typical value Sensitivitycoeff. Method, distribution 3.1 Reference 1 U U n = 15 nm 1 B standard n 4 (Cal. Gauss certificate) 3. Deviation in 1 a ( a ) localisation y G y = 100 µm G B 3 G = 0 Rect. nm/mm 3.3 Repeatability s ( Pt n ) s = 3 nm 1 B Gauss 3.4 Topography 1 s ( Rz) s(rz) = 50 1 A S n nm Gauss Variance /nm 56 1,3 9 51 Chapters are given in relationship to DKD 4-

Uncertainty of Points of Profile () Ch. Input quantity keyword 3.5 Straightness datum 3.6 Residual Determined by Typical value Sensitivity -coeff. Method, distribution Wt Wt 0 0 = 50 nm 1 B 1 Rect. 1 1 Rz Rz 0 = 0 nm 1 A 0 S 1 Rect. a a pl pl = 5 nm 1 B 3 Rect. 1 1 0nm u(r sp ) = -0 nm/mm B u( r ) sp 0,5 µm Rect. 3 S μm noise ( ) 3.7 Plastic deform. 3.8 Stylus tip Variance /nm 0 83 8,3 83 Point Sum of variances u ( z g ) 761,6 variance Point u ( z g ) 8 nm Chapters are given in relationship to DKD 4-

Uncertainty of Points of Profile (3) Example for a roughness standard of type D with Rz 3 µm Using ls filtering! Ch. Input quantity keyword Determined by Typical value Sensitivitycoeff. Method, distribution 3.1 Reference 1 U U n = 15 nm 1 B standard n 4 (Cal. Gauss certificate) 3. Deviation in 1 a ( a G) localisation y y = 100 µm G B 3 G = 0 Rect. nm/mm 3.3 Repeatability s ( Pt n ) s = 3 nm 1 B Gauss 3.4 Topography 1 s ( Rz) s(rz) = 50 1 A fs nm Gauss S n Variance /nm 56 1,3 9 130 Chapters are given in relationship to DKD 4-

Uncertainty of Points of Profile (4) Using ls filtering! Ch. Input Determined by Typical Sensitivity Method, Variance quantity value -coeff. distribution /nm 3.5 Straightness s Wt 0 Wt 0 = 50 1 B 0 f 1 nm Rect. datum 3.6 Residual 1 1 ( Rz ) noise 0 f Rz = 0 nm 1 A 5 0 s S 1 Rect. 3.7 Plastic a a pl = 5 nm 1 B.5 pl deform. fs Rect. 3 3.8 Stylus tip 1 1 0nm u(r sp ) = -0 nm/mm B.5 u( r ) 3 sp f s S μm 0,5 µm Rect. Point Sum of variances u ( z s ) 6,3 variance Point u ( z s ) 15 nm uncert. u sys (Rz) = S u (z s ) = (10/5)* u (z s ) Chapters are given in relationship to DKD 4- u sys (Rz) = 0.6* u (z s ) ~ 9 nm

Uncertainty of Parameter Since S is smaller than 1 U(Rz) can be approximated with the coverage factor of k = by U ( Rz) [ 1 4 + U n s ( Rz) n Rz 1 0 + + (Rz)] 1 Abbreviation Uncertainty Source Determined by calibration factor from calibration certificate u v 1 U n 4 s ( Rz) n statistic on surface standard deviation of Rz, n preferred 1 1 u v Rz noise flat glass roughness measurement, 1 0 by rectangular probability distribution (Rz)] 1 unknown systematic errors comparison Comment: Approximation of starting model of uncertainty, containing the most important sources or those, which are subject to change

Comparison of Roughness Parameters in DKD - Round Robin Parameters with lamba-s Parameters without lamba-s lamba-c type in mm Ra Rz1max Rz Ra Rz1max Rz Geometrical coarse,5 0, 0,3 0, 0,5 0,3 0,3 standard coarse 0,8 0, 0,3 0,4 0,4 0,3 0,3 Type C3 medium 0,8 0,3 0,4 0,4 0, 0, 0, fine 0,8 0,4 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,3 0,5 fine 0,5 0,6 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,5 number of labs 9 4 Roughness very coarse,5 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,4 0,5 0,3 standard coarse 0,8 0,5 0,6 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,4 type D1 medium 0,8 0,4 0,3 0,5 0,5 0,5 0,1 fine 0,8 0,3 0,7 0,7 1,1 0,3 0,9 number of labs 7 5 Roughness coarse 0,5 0,3 1,3 0,5 0,6 1,5 0,6 standard medium 0,5 0,3 1, 0,8 0,4 0,8 0,7 type D fine 0,5 0,9,1 1,9 1,4 1,9 number of labs 6 4 Comment: Noticed are the standard deviations of the average values of parameters (excerpt) Average over laboratories, numbers are mentioned Labs far from average are excluded (En-criterion of EAL G7) With λs no significant improvement of uncertainty component, even deterioration better value in comparison with and without ls

Contribution to Uncertainty Expanded uncertainty of roughness parameters, e.g. Rz: ~ 3.5% of measurement value. Contribution of Sources: noise 0,5% comparison 0,5% 0,5% traceability,0% surface