ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT

Similar documents
REACH 1 T37S-R14W-S07NW

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT RESTORATION MONITORING STREAM HABITAT REPORT. Peggy Kavanagh, Trevan Cornwell TOLEDO SOUTH Coast Range Lora Tennant

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT. Jennifer Bock / Eric Evans / LaNoah Babcock HUC NUMBER: LLID:

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON & WATERSHEDS STREAM RESTORATION HABITAT REPORT

A Guide To Interpreting Stream Survey Reports. Scott C. Foster Charles H. Stein Kim K. Jones. Edited by Patricia A. Bowers

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF STREAM CONDITIONS AND HABITAT TYPES IN REACH 4, REACH 5 AND REACH 6.

Appendix E Rosgen Classification

APPENDIX E. GEOMORPHOLOGICAL MONTORING REPORT Prepared by Steve Vrooman, Keystone Restoration Ecology September 2013

Riparian Assessment. Steps in the right direction... Drainage Basin/Watershed: Start by Thinking Big. Riparian Assessment vs.

Rosgen Classification Unnamed Creek South of Dunka Road

APPENDIX A REACH DECRIPTIONS. Quantico Creek Watershed Assessment April 2011

C. STUDENT FIELD DATA SHEETS

Dan Miller + Kelly Burnett, Kelly Christiansen, Sharon Clarke, Lee Benda. GOAL Predict Channel Characteristics in Space and Time

Fish Passage at Road Crossings

Habitat Assessment. Peggy Compton UW-Extension Water Action Volunteers Program Coordinator

GEOL 652. Poudre River Fieldtrip

Why Geomorphology for Fish Passage

GENERAL SUMMARY BIG WOOD RIVER GEOMORPHIC ASSESSMENT BLAINE COUNTY, IDAHO

Aquifer an underground zone or layer of sand, gravel, or porous rock that is saturated with water.

PolyMet NorthMet Project

Fluvial Driven Alluvial Fans

Limitation to qualitative stability indicators. the real world is a continuum, not a dichotomy ~ 100 % 30 % ~ 100 % ~ 40 %

Conceptual Model of Stream Flow Processes for the Russian River Watershed. Chris Farrar

Rapid Geomorphic Assessments: RGA s

Elevation (ft) Slope ( ) County CONDITION CATEGORY. Parameter Natural Condition Slightly impacted Moderately Impacted Heavily Impacted

Case Study 14. Rocky Creek Vented Box Culvert Ford

!"#$%&&'()*+#$%(,-./0*)%(!

SALMONID HABITAT ASSESSMENT UPPER MILLER CREEK

Appendix III-A Descriptions of Channel Habitat Types

Stream Classification

HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE

CR AAO Bridge. Dead River Flood & Natural Channel Design. Mitch Koetje Water Resources Division UP District

Case Study 2: Twenty-mile Creek Rock Fords

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Assignment 1. Measuring River Characteristics- Vernon Creek. Applied Fluvial Geomorphology Field Techniques EESc 435

Little Blackfoot TPA 2009 Sediment and Habitat Assessment QAQC Review March 9, 2010

Stream Simulation: A Simple Example

Forest Service AOP Meeting Objectives of Stream Simulation: Examples and Talking Points

ADDRESSING GEOMORPHIC AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLS IN OFF-CHANNEL HABITAT DESIGN

Gully Erosion Part 1 GULLY EROSION AND ITS CAUSES. Introduction. The mechanics of gully erosion

Assessment. Assessment

1.0 Appendix. Appendix A In-stream LWD Data Collection Sheet In Stream LWD Data Collection Stream Site: Coordinates:x y Crew: Date: Dia-4.

Stream Restoration and Environmental River Mechanics. Objectives. Pierre Y. Julien. 1. Peligre Dam in Haiti (deforestation)

Flood and Stream Restoration

Design and Construction

Step 5: Channel Bed and Planform Changes

BUREAU OF CLEAN WATER. Appendix C Biological Field Methods C1. Habitat Assessment DECEMBER 2013

Stream Geomorphology. Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012

SECTION G SEDIMENT BUDGET

Business. Meteorologic monitoring. Field trip? Reader. Other?

Session C1 - Applying the Stream Functions Pyramid to Geomorphic Assessments and Restoration Design

YUBA COUNTY WATER AGENCY

The River Restoration Centre therrc.co.uk. Understanding Fluvial Processes: supporting River Restoration. Dr Jenny Mant

Carex nudata, a native sedge, as facilitator of restoration goals following passive restoration

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

Natural Shoreline Landscapes on Michigan Inland Lakes

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Step 6: Rapid Habitat Assessment (RHA)

UPPER KETTLE CREEK FISH HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TRIBUTARIES ADDENDUM

Black Gore Creek 2013 Sediment Source Monitoring and TMDL Sediment Budget

Restoring Meanders to Straightened Rivers 1.7 Reconnecting remnant meanders

CASE STUDIES. Introduction

Appendix G. Meso-Habitat Surveys. DRAFT Annual Technical Report

Upper Truckee River Restoration Lake Tahoe, California Presented by Brendan Belby Sacramento, California

Lower South Fork McKenzie River Floodplain Enhancement Project

STUDY PERFORMANCE REPORT

7.1 COMPONENTS OF THE HABITAT CHARACTERIZATION 7.2 HABITAT SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN THE SAMPLING REACH 7.3 LOGISTICS AND WORK FLOW 7

Kootenai River Habitat Restoration Program Update

Tom Ballestero University of New Hampshire. 1 May 2013

River Restoration and Rehabilitation. Pierre Y. Julien

Geomorphic Assessment of the Middle and Lower Swan Lake Watershed, Calhoun Division of Two Rivers National Wildlife Refuge.

NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, PA

Fine sediment in pools: an index of how sediment is affecting a stream channel

Appendix F Channel Grade Control Structures

Carmel River Bank Stabilization at Rancho San Carlos Road Project Description and Work Plan March 2018

Historical channel change on the Upper Gila River, Arizona and New Mexico in response to anthropogenic modifications and extreme floods

Learning Objectives: I can identify and interpret river flows and directions.

Addressing the Impact of Road-Stream Crossing Structures on the Movement of Aquatic Organisms

SCOPE OF PRESENTATION STREAM DYNAMICS, CHANNEL RESTORATION PLANS, & SEDIMENT TRANSPORT ANALYSES IN RELATION TO RESTORATION PLANS

APPENDIX 4B FOOTHILL YELLOW-LEGGED FROG SURVEY DATASHEETS AND STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES (BASED ON SELTENRICH AND POOL,

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Copies: Date: 10/19/2017. Subject: Project No.: Greg Laird, Courtney Moore. Kevin Pilgrim and Travis Stroth

-- Lessons from a successful salmon stream and estuary relocation on Gravina Island

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

Long Valley Meadow Restoration Project

Ways To Identify Background Verses Accelerated Erosion

Avoiding Geohazards in the Mid-Atlantic Highlands by Using Natural Stream Principles

Clyde River Landslide

Island Design. UMRS EMP Regional Workshop. Presentation for the

APPENDIX B WORKSHEETS & EXHIBITS

Figure A 6. Floodplain and instream geomorphic units associated with the Bedrock-controlled, elongate discontinuous floodplain river style.

Rapid Assessment of Stream Conditions Along Length (RASCAL) Protocol

Waterbury Dam Disturbance Mike Fitzgerald Devin Rowland

4 CHANNEL HABITAT TYPING

MORRO BAY WATERSHED STEELHEAD RESTORATION PLANNING PROJECT

6.11 Naas River Management Unit

Surface Water and Stream Development

Streams. Stream Water Flow

Case Study 8. North Fork Nooksack River In-channel Project

Transcription:

ODFW AQUATIC INVENTORY PROJECT STREAM REPORT STREAM: BASIN: Basin Creek Willow Creek DATE: July 9 3, 9 SURVEY CREW: REPORT PREPARED BY: USGS MAPS: ECOREGION: Nicole Bushey / Emily Zimmermann Staci Stein Mormon Basin Blue Mountains Continental Zone Foothills BASIN AREA: 39.4km STREAM ORDER: 4 FIRST ORDER TRIBUTARIES: 5 HUC NUMBER: 759 LLID: 7655443389 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The Basin Creek habitat survey began at the BLM property boundary and continued upstream 334 meters ending by Rock Springs. Two reaches were designated based on land use. The stream was constrained by hillslopes and terraces. Land use was heavy grazing and mining. Seventy five percent of the stream habitat was dry channel units. The substrate was a combination of cobble (4%), gravel (7%), fine sediments (7%), and boulder (3%). There was a very low volume of large wood observed in the stream channel. Active bank erosion ranged from 5-39 percent of the stream length. The vegetation found most frequently in the riparian zones were shrubs, grasses, and hardwoods 3-5cm dbh (based on seven riparian transects). REACH DESCRIPTIONS: Reach : Reach : (T3S-R4E-S3SE) Length 586 meters. Reach began where BLM property began. The channel was constrained alternately by terraces and hillslopes in a broad valley floor. The average valley width index was 4.7 (range:.-5.). Land use was heavy grazing and mining. The average unit gradient was 5.5 percent. The stream channel was 9 percent dry. Cobble (4%), gravel (8%), and fine sediments (%) were the primary stream substrates. There was 39 percent actively eroding stream banks and no large wood was noted in the channel. The predominant vegetation in the riparian zones were grasses and shrubs (based on three riparian transects). (T3S-R4E-S9SE) Length 648 meters. Reach began at a fence crossing the stream channel. The channel was predominately constrained by hillslopes in a moderate V-shaped narrow valley floor. The average valley width index was 3. (range:.5-5.). Land use was mining. The average unit gradient was 8.8 percent. The stream substrate was a combination of cobble (4%), gravel (6%), boulder (7%), and fine sediments (4%). Fifty two percent of the stream channel was dry and 7 percent was rapids. There was 5 percent actively eroding banks and.4m 3 /m large wood debris in the channel. The trees found most frequently in the riparian zones hardwood 3-5cm dbh (based on four riparian transects). Due to thick vegetation in the stream channel and along the banks, the crew estimated several units in the upper length of reach two.

Basin Creek (continued) COMMENTS: Reach one was heavily grazed and trampled by cattle. In addition, there were piles of old mine tailings along the stream banks. The stream channel in reach two was obscured with dense vegetation in several locations. Cattle were excluded from reach two and there was evidence of mining. An unscreened diversion near the middle of this reach diverted much of the little water that was present. Wildlife noted by the crew included rattlesnakes, chukars, and mourning doves.

45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 REACH ROAD FORD TRIBUTARY FENCE CROSSING MASS FAILURE 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters) 45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 PERCENT SHADE 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters)

45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 PERCENT SILT AND ORGANICS 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters) 45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 PERCENT SILT, ORGANICS, AND SAND 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters)

45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 PERCENT GRAVEL 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters) 45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 PERCENT BEDROCK 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters)

45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 NUMBER OF BOULDERS (running average per m.) 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters) 45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 POOLS > OR = TO METERS DEEP 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 DEPTH (meters) 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters)

45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 PIECES OF LARGE WOOD 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters) 45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 VOLUME OF LARGE WOOD (cubic meters) 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters)

45 BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 4 ELEVATION (meters) 35 3 5 KEYPIECES OF LARGE WOOD 5 3 4 5 6 DISTANCE (meters)

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 3/9/ Survey Date: 7/9/9 REACH T3S-R4E-S3SE REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Valley Width Index Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Constrained Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain 4.7 VWI Range: - 5 Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 5 First Terrace n = Width: Depth:.3. Width: Height:,586,5 5 84.7. 4.8.5 ( 3. - 7.65 (.4 -.6 ) ) 7 8..9 ( 5.3 -.7 (.7 -. ) ) W:D ratio:.4 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.8 Stream Flow Type: Average Unit Gradient: PD 5.5% Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): 6.5-6.5 Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary HG G MI S..4 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 39% Reach avg: 43% Undercut Banks: % Range: 8-94 All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: 3/9/ Survey Date: 7/9/9 REACH T3S-R4E-S9SE REACH Valley and Channel Summary Narrow Valley Floor Steep V-shape Moderate V-shape Open V-shape Hillslope Bedrock Terrace Alt. Terrace/Hill Landuse Valley Characteristics (Percent Reach Length) Valley Width Index Constrained % % % Broad Valley Floor Constraining Terraces Multiple Terraces Wide Floodplain 3. VWI Range:.5-5 Channel Morphology (Percent Reach Length) % % % % % Unconstrained Single Channel Multiple Channel Braided Channel % % % % % % Channel Characteristics Type Length (m) Area (m) Dry Units Primary Secondary Channel Dimensions (m) Wetted Active Floodprone n = 5 First Terrace n = 3 Width: Depth:.. Width: Height:,648,646 6 37.8.3 4.6.5 ( 3.5-7 (.4 - ) ) 8 7.. ( 4.6-9.4 (.65 -.5 ) ) W:D ratio:.4 Entrenchment (ACW:FPW ratio):.8 Stream Flow Type: Average Unit Gradient: PD 8.8% Habitat Units/m (total channel length): Habitat Units/m (primary channel length): Water temperature ( C): 4.5-4.5 Land Use: Riparian Vegetation: Riparian, Bank, and Wood Summary Primary Secondary MI S D3.7.8 Bank Condition and Shade Bank Status Percent Reach Length Shade (% of 8) Actively Eroding: 5% Reach avg: 89% Undercut Banks: % Range: 5 - All pieces (>=3m x.5m): Volume (m 3): Key pieces (>=m x.6m): Large Wood Debris Total Total / m primary channel 6.6.4

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/9 Survey Date: 7/9/9 REACH T3S-R4E-S3SE REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk DRY CHANNEL 5 7.6,37 7 9 45 6 POOL-DAMMED 7.3.5 3 37 5 7 9 7 4 POOL-LATERAL SCOUR 5 3.5.8 9 7 8 5 45 4 PUDDLED UNIT 89.8 3 773 53 5 9 8 4 7 RIFFLE 3 3. 6 59 5 33 5 9 STEP/STRUCTURE. 5 65 Total: 38,7.3.,335 88 Avg: 8 4 8 HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools 7.3.5.4% Scour Pools 5 3.5.8.9% Glides % Riffles 3 3. 6 59 6.83% Rapids % Cascades % Step/Falls. 4% Dry 7,55.3,43 9.8% Culverts % POOL SUMMARY 3 9 55 3.6 4.5 3..9 All Pools: Total 7 Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km 4. Primary Channel Length # / Km 4.4 Pools >=m deep:.6.6 Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): 89. Residual pool depth (avg):.55

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/9 Survey Date: 7/9/9 REACH T3S-R4E-S9SE REACH HABITAT DETAIL Habitat Type Number Total Avg Avg Total Large Substrate Units Length Width Depth Area Boulders Percent Wetted Area (m) (m) (m) (m ) (#>.5m) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk DRY CHANNEL 5 443. 7 6 5 9 3 38 6 GLIDE 3.. 34 65 5 MIX OF HABITATS 3 8.9 5 6 6 5 3 3 39 3 POOL-DAMMED 3..4 6 3 3 POOL-LATERAL SCOUR 33.5.8 46 8 4 8 43 3 POOL-PLUNGE..48 5 5 9 6 5 PUDDLED UNIT 5 359.5 73 4 4 7 4 43 RAPID/BOULDERS 48.9. 447 7 3 4 5 3 RIFFLE 4 9.7 3 59 7 8 55 6 STEP/BOULDERS 3 5.9 5 9 3 5 3 5 STEP/STRUCTURE 3. 3 55 5 Total: 46,7..,683 43 Avg: 3 6 4 7 HABITAT SUMMARY Habitat Group Number Total Avg Avg Units Length Width Depth Wetted Area Large Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) Percent Number (# / m ) Dammed & BW Pools 3..4 6.36% Scour Pools 35.5.3 5 3.% Glides 3.. 34.% Riffles 4 9.7 3 59 3.48% Rapids 48.9. 447 6.55% Cascades % Step/Falls 4 7.7 5.3% Dry 8.9 875 5.% Culverts % POOL SUMMARY 7 58 6.5 39.3.9 6.9. 6.6 All Pools: Total Total of all Channel Lengths # / Km 7. Primary Channel Length # / Km 7.3 Pools >=m deep: Complex pools (LWD pieces>=3): Pool frequency (channel widths/pool): 5. Residual pool depth (avg):.9

STREAM SUMMARY BASIN CREEK Number Total Avg Avg Total Substrate Large Units Length Width Depth Area Percent Wetted Area Boulders (m) (m) (m) (m ) S/O Snd Grvl Cbl Bldr Bdrk (#>.5m) 84 3,4.. 4,7 6 7 4 3 53 Habitat Group Wetted Area (m ) Percent Dammed & BW Pools Scour Pools Glides Riffles Rapids Cascades Step/Falls Dry 6 7 34 8 447 6 3,8.39%.79%.84% 5.43%.% %.5% 75.4% Culverts % Unsurveyed 6 5.3%

BASIN CREEK: HABITAT DISTRIBUTION 5 REACH WETTED AREA (m^) 5 5 DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY 9 REACH 8 7 WETTED AREA (m^) 6 5 4 3 DAM POOL SCOUR POOL GLIDE RIFFLE RAPID CASCADE STEP/FALL DRY

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/9 Survey Date: 7/9/9 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH REACH Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) 3 transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer.3.3.3. Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) 3 33 33 8 34 Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) 33 33 33 33 67 83 7 7 8 4 7 4

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/9 Survey Date: 7/9/9 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION SUMMARY REACH REACH Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) 4 transects Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft 396 59 5 Diameter class (cm) 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm Total/m Average number of trees in a 5-meter wide band Zone Zone Zone 3 Zones -3 - meters - meters - 3 meters -3 meters Conifer Conifer Conifer Conifer.8.3.5.5 5.5.8 6.3.5.8.3.3.3.5.3.3.3.5.3.3.4 5.8.8. Canopy closure Shrub cover Grass/forb cover Hillslope High terrace Low terrace Floodplain Wetland/meadow Stream channel Roadbed/Railroad Riprap Surface slope (%) Canopy closure and ground cover Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) 4 3 5 6 6 59 Predominant landform in each zone Zone Zone Zone 3 - meters - meters - 3 meters (%) (%) (%) 88 3 88 3 3 34 48 8 9 56

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT INVENTORY - RIPARIAN SURVEY BASIN CREEK 7/9/9 Summary of Riparian Zone (-3m) for all reaches 7 transects Summary of riparian zone (- feet) extrapolated to, feet along stream Total hardwoods/ Total conifers/ ft Total conifers >" dbh/ ft Total conifers >35" dbh/ ft 6 57 9 Average number of trees in a 5-m wide band Diameter class (cm) Zones -3-3 meters Conifer 3-5cm 5-3cm 3-5cm 5-9cm >9cm.7.9.9. 3.3.4

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/9 Survey Date: 7/9/9 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach Reach Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass 3-5 5-3 3-5 5-9 >9 Notes 6 LF RB Conifer T- 45568/4956 97 6 LF HT 4 Conifer 6 LF 3 HS 75 3 Conifer 6 RT RB 5 4 Conifer 6 RT HT 35 3 Conifer 6 RT 3 HS 5 35 35 Conifer 4 LF HT 5 65 Conifer T- 45649/496 4 LF HT 35 4 Conifer 4 LF 3 HT 4 4 Conifer 4 RT HT 5 4 Conifer 4 RT HT 45 4 Conifer 4 RT 3 HS 4 35 5 Conifer 3 LF HS 5 6 75 5 Conifer T- 45644/4966 5 3 LF HS 5 35 4 Conifer 3 LF 3 HS 35 3 5 Conifer 3 RT HS 5 8 85 Conifer 3 RT HS 5 5 5 Conifer MINE TAILINGS 3 RT 3 HS 4 45 Conifer MINE TAILINGS

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE BASIN CREEK HABITAT INVENTORY Report Date: /8/9 Survey Date: 7/9/9 RIPARIAN ZONE VEGETATION Reach Reach Cover (percent) Diameter class (cm) Unit Side Zone Surface Slope Canopy Shrub Grass 3-5 5-3 3-5 5-9 >9 Notes 4 LF HS 75 75 Conifer T45636/49 79 4 LF HS 35 5 7 Conifer 4 LF 3 HS 4 5 65 Conifer 4 RT HT 55 45 Conifer 5 4 RT HS 75 6 Conifer 4 RT 3 HS 75 5 6 Conifer 6 LF HS 5 75 65 Conifer T- 5 45684/4973 5 6 LF HS 3 3 65 Conifer 6 LF 3 HS 35 45 5 Conifer 6 RT HS 5 8 Conifer 6 RT HS 45 5 85 Conifer 6 RT 3 HS 5 3 65 Conifer 8 LF HS 5 8 Conifer T- 4557/4977 43 8 LF HS 35 4 9 Conifer 8 LF 3 HS 35 Conifer 8 RT HS 5 8 Conifer 8 RT HS 3 Conifer 8 RT 3 HS 8 3 Conifer BEDROCK 84 LF HS 5 55 4 Conifer T- 45558L/498 8L

84 LF RB 5 4 Conifer 84 LF 3 HS 35 8 9 Conifer 84 RT HS 35 65 95 5 Conifer 3 84 RT HS 5 3 6 Conifer 84 RT 3 HS 35 85 Conifer

BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN) SUMMER-9 REACH UNIT# TYPE CHAN DIST.(m) COMMENTS NOTE_ESTIMATOR NOTE_NUMERATOR DC T-4547/49558 3 DC 74 METAL PIPE PIECES IN STREAM 6 DC 469 RF,TJ/ T-45568/495697 TRACTOR TIRE IN STREAM 7 PD RF UNNAMED TRIB ON TOPO MAP 8 PD TRIB PUDDLING ON ROADBED MUDDY COW PATH, HEAVY USE 9 PD 69 SS/ COILED HOSES RIGHT BANK RI 698 PLASTIC PIPE IN RIGHT BANK LP 7 U OIL DRUM ON LEFT BANK 6 PD 753 WL MOURNING DOVES 8 DC (4) COWS 9 DP 78 ARTIFICIAL GRAVEL DAM SS 78 H=.3M ARTIFICIAL DAM DP 785 T=8.5C AT : DC 85 /TJ T-45649/496 3 DC UNNAMED TRIB ON TOPO MAP GRASS, CATTLE TRAILS 4 DC 933 WL T-45649/496 (4) CHUKARS 5 PD 98 WL FLOCK OF CHUKARS 3 LP 68 T-45644/49665 3 PD 48 TJ/,WL T=6.5C AT : FLOCK OF BIRDS 3 DC UNNAMED TRIB ON TOPO MAP DEAD GRASS & SAGEBRUSH 34 DC 458 METAL CRANK IN STREAM 37 PD 586 /TJ,FC T-45757/49683, CATTLE 38 PD UNNAMED TRIB ON TOPO MAP CATTLE TRAMPLED GRASS, MUD 39 PD 686 WL () RATTLESNAKES 43 RB 85 T-45636/4979 45 RB 88 LA/ PLASTIC PIPE BANK RIGHT 53 SB 978 H=.4M 56 DC PLASTIC CULVERT/PIPE BANK LEFT 6 RB 76 T-45684/49735 6 RB 3 CORRUGATED METAL IN STREAM 63 SS 6 H=.6M, DAM DIVERTING WATER ARTIFICIAL DAM 64 DP 8 UD/ T-45653L/497376L 65 RI OLD FENCE BANK LEFT 67 RB 49 /SS ESTIMATED DUE TO BRUSH 68 RI 68 T=4.5C AT : 69 MX 38 TJ/ TRIB T-45539/49756 ESTIMATED - TOO BRUSHY 7 DC UNNAMED TRIB ON MAP 7 SB 353 H=.7M 74 MX 48 CS MINE TAILINGS, ESTIMATED BRUSH 75 SB 43 H=.7M 76 GL 44 PLASTIC BARREL BANK LEFT 77 RB 53 JUNIPERS ON HILLSLOPES ESTIMATED - TOO BRUSHY 78 PD 59 TJ/ ESTIMATED - TOO BRUSHY 79 DC 66 T-45545L/49767L, GRASS 8 PD 653 T-4557/497743 8 PD 69 U8-84 ESTIMATED - TOO BRUSHY 84 MX 335 T-45558L/4988L END SURVEY BY ROCK SPRING

Basin Creek (Willow Creek Basin) Stream Habitat Survey -Summer 9 Basin Creek-Reach - View from Road Looking Downstream Basin Creek- Looking from Road at Mining Operation Basin Creek-Reach Basin Photo Basin Creek-Reach -u4- Looking Upstream Basin Creek-Reach -u-artificial Dam Basin Creek- Reach -u3-dry Tributary

Basin Creek (Willow Creek Basin) Stream Habitat Survey -Summer 9 Basin Creek-Reach -u4-looking Upstream Basin Creek-Reach -u3-eroding Bank Basin Creek-Reach -u38-cattle in Riparian Basin Creek-Reach -u4-looking Upstream Basin Creek-Reach -u64-diversion to Canal Basin Creek-Reach -u69-brushy Stream Channel

Basin Creek (Willow Creek Basin) Stream Habitat Survey -Summer 9 Basin Creek-Reach -u78-looking Upstream-Very Brushy Basin Creek-Reach -u84- Downstream Reach view from Road Basin Creek-Looking Upstream from Public Land- Backhoe on Bank Basin Creek-Looking Upstream Public Land- View of Mine

4 5 m 4 5 m 4 53 m 4 54 m 49 5 m 49 6 m 49 7 m 49 8 m 49 9 Reach Reach Start of Survey End of Survey unit #39 49 5 m 49 6 m 49 7 m 49 8 m 4 5 m 4 5 m 4 53 m 4 54 m Name: MORMON BASIN Date: /3/9 Scale: inch equals 6 feet Location: 4559 E 496665 N NAD 83 Caption: BASIN CREEK (WILLOW CREEK BASIN-SUMMER 9) STREAM HABITAT SURVEY Copyright (C) 998, Maptech, Inc.