FIG S1: Rarefaction analysis of observed richness within Drosophila. All calculations were

Similar documents
Title ghost-tree: creating hybrid-gene phylogenetic trees for diversity analyses

Other resources. Greengenes (bacterial) Silva (bacteria, archaeal and eukarya)

Nature Biotechnology: doi: /nbt Supplementary Figure 1. Detailed overview of the primer-free full-length SSU rrna library preparation.

Taxonomy and Clustering of SSU rrna Tags. Susan Huse Josephine Bay Paul Center August 5, 2013

Microbiome: 16S rrna Sequencing 3/30/2018

Example study for granular bioreactor stratification: three. dimensional evaluation of a sulfate reducing granular bioreactor

Amplicon Sequencing. Dr. Orla O Sullivan SIRG Research Fellow Teagasc

Using Topological Data Analysis to find discrimination between microbial states in human microbiome data

Lecture 2: Diversity, Distances, adonis. Lecture 2: Diversity, Distances, adonis. Alpha- Diversity. Alpha diversity definition(s)

Outline Classes of diversity measures. Species Divergence and the Measurement of Microbial Diversity. How do we describe and compare diversity?

Chad Burrus April 6, 2010

Microbial analysis with STAMP

Supplementary Materials for

The Effect of Primer Choice and Short Read Sequences on the Outcome of 16S rrna Gene Based Diversity Studies

Microbiota: Its Evolution and Essence. Hsin-Jung Joyce Wu "Microbiota and man: the story about us

Lecture: Mixture Models for Microbiome data

THEORY. Based on sequence Length According to the length of sequence being compared it is of following two types

Bioinformatics tools for phylogeny and visualization. Yanbin Yin

An Adaptive Association Test for Microbiome Data

Lecture 3: Mixture Models for Microbiome data. Lecture 3: Mixture Models for Microbiome data

Package LDM. R topics documented: March 19, Type Package

Phylogenetic trees 07/10/13

Supplementary Material

diversity(datamatrix, index= shannon, base=exp(1))

Variations in pelagic bacterial communities in the North Atlantic Ocean coincide with water bodies

Probing diversity in a hidden world: applications of NGS in microbial ecology

Assessing and Improving Methods Used in Operational Taxonomic Unit-Based Approaches for 16S rrna Gene Sequence Analysis

Carlo Vittorio Cannistraci. Minimum Curvilinear Embedding unveils nonlinear patterns in 16S metagenomic data

Taxonomy. Content. How to determine & classify a species. Phylogeny and evolution

Exploring Microbes in the Sea. Alma Parada Postdoctoral Scholar Stanford University

An Automated Phylogenetic Tree-Based Small Subunit rrna Taxonomy and Alignment Pipeline (STAP)

Bacterial growth efficiency: do consumer and resource diversity influence the fate of carbon in aquatic ecosystems?

What is the range of a taxon? A scaling problem at three levels: Spa9al scale Phylogene9c depth Time

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Microbial Taxonomy. Microbes usually have few distinguishing properties that relate them, so a hierarchical taxonomy mainly has not been possible.

Microbial Diversity and Assessment (II) Spring, 2007 Guangyi Wang, Ph.D. POST103B

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Biological Networks: Comparison, Conservation, and Evolution via Relative Description Length By: Tamir Tuller & Benny Chor

Supplemental Online Results:

Compositional similarity and β (beta) diversity

STATISTICAL LEARNING OF INTEGRATIVE ANALYSIS. Meilei Jiang

Supplementary Information

Multivariate Statistics 101. Ordination (PCA, NMDS, CA) Cluster Analysis (UPGMA, Ward s) Canonical Correspondence Analysis

Supplementary File 4: Methods Summary and Supplementary Methods

Microbial Taxonomy and the Evolution of Diversity

Lecture 5: Ecological distance metrics; Principal Coordinates Analysis. Univariate testing vs. community analysis

Microbes usually have few distinguishing properties that relate them, so a hierarchical taxonomy mainly has not been possible.

Microbial Taxonomy. Slowly evolving molecules (e.g., rrna) used for large-scale structure; "fast- clock" molecules for fine-structure.

Lecture 5: Ecological distance metrics; Principal Coordinates Analysis. Univariate testing vs. community analysis

Robert Edgar. Independent scientist

Finding Motifs in Protein Sequences and Marking Their Positions in Protein Structures

Dynamic optimisation identifies optimal programs for pathway regulation in prokaryotes. - Supplementary Information -

08/21/2017 BLAST. Multiple Sequence Alignments: Clustal Omega

PhyloNet. Yun Yu. Department of Computer Science Bioinformatics Group Rice University

Supplementary material to Whitney, K. D., B. Boussau, E. J. Baack, and T. Garland Jr. in press. Drift and genome complexity revisited. PLoS Genetics.

LDM Package. 1 Overview. Yi-Juan Hu and Glen A. Satten March 19, 2018

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY. Microbiology Programme: Bachelor of Science (Honours) Microbiology

Introduction to microbiota data analysis

Taxonomical Classification using:

Changes in bacterial gut community of Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar) and Reticulitermes tibialis Banks after feeding on termiticidal bait material

Comparative genomics: Overview & Tools + MUMmer algorithm

BIO 682 Multivariate Statistics Spring 2008

The minimal prokaryotic genome. The minimal prokaryotic genome. The minimal prokaryotic genome. The minimal prokaryotic genome

Tree Building Activity

II. Deep insight into plant habitats

2/19/2018. Dataset: 85,122 islands 19,392 > 1km 2 17,883 with data

Investigation 3: Comparing DNA Sequences to Understand Evolutionary Relationships with BLAST

Taxonomy and distribution of phenazine-producing. Pseudomonas spp. in the dryland agroecosystem of the. Inland Pacific Northwest (U. S.

Phylogenetic Tree Generation using Different Scoring Methods

MiGA: The Microbial Genome Atlas

Structure, function and host control of rhizosphere microbiome

A (short) introduction to phylogenetics

Courses offered by the Biology Department- a 5 year plan

Bem Vindo. Amazonian Biodiversity and Systematics in Brazil.

G.S. Gilbert, ENVS291 Transition to R vf13 Class 10 Vegan and Picante. Class 10b - Tools for Phylogenetic Ecology

2/7/2018. Strata. Strata

Phylogenetic diversity and conservation

Generating phylogenetic trees with Phylomatic and dendrograms of functional traits in R

Session 5: Phylogenomics

Deciphering the Enigma of Undetected Species, Phylogenetic, and Functional Diversity. Based on Good-Turing Theory

Characterizing and predicting cyanobacterial blooms in an 8-year

Using Machine Learning to Understand Top-Down Effects in an Ecosystem: Opportunities, Challenges, and Lessons Learned

Courses offered by the Biology Department- a 5 year plan

Algorithms in Bioinformatics

Microbiology BIOL 202 Lecture Course Outcome Guide (COG) Approved 22 MARCH 2012 Pg.1

Measurement and Data

Detecting bacterial associations in the human microbiome

Stepping stones towards a new electronic prokaryotic taxonomy. The ultimate goal in taxonomy. Pragmatic towards diagnostics

arxiv: v1 [q-bio.pe] 7 Jul 2014

Supplementary Information

Comparing Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Cells

Istituto di Microbiologia. Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma. Gut Microbiota assessment and the Meta-HIT program.

Correlation Analysis of Binary Similarity and Distance Measures on Different Binary Database Types

Phylogenetics - Orthology, phylogenetic experimental design and phylogeny reconstruction. Lesser Tenrec (Echinops telfairi)

Using Bioinformatics to Study Evolutionary Relationships Instructions

Assigning Taxonomy to Marker Genes. Susan Huse Brown University August 7, 2014

University of Florida CISE department Gator Engineering. Clustering Part 1

Microbial Diversity. Yuzhen Ye I609 Bioinformatics Seminar I (Spring 2010) School of Informatics and Computing Indiana University

Let s get started. So, what is science?

Transcription:

Page 1 of 14 FIG S1: Rarefaction analysis of observed richness within Drosophila. All calculations were performed using mothur (2). OTUs were defined at the 3% divergence threshold using the average neighbor clustering algorithm. Library identifiers are given in Table 1.

Page 2 of 14 FIG S2: Number of OTUs as a function of genetic distance. Number of OTUs was calculated at all genetic distances from 0 (unique sequences) to the largest distance between any two sequences (0.217 for yeast and 0.276 for bacteria). Clustering was performed using the average neighbor algorithm in mothur (2). Only the twelve populations for which both yeast and bacterial data (1) are available are included in this analysis.

Page 3 of 14 FIG S3: Phylogenetic tree of Ascomycete yeasts (Uploaded as a separate file due to its size) Representative sequences of each OTU are highlighted in blue. Each representative sequence has a unique identifier corresponding to a sequence within the FASTA files available on BioTorrents Additionally, each representative sequence has been given a taxonomy assignment (Dataset S7). Unhighlighted taxa are from the SILVA parc database and each is followed by its NCBI accession number. The NEWICK tree file is available on BioTorrents

Page 4 of 14 FIG S4: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Unweighted UniFrac, P=0.426) bacterial communities. This plot represents unweighted UniFrac data (P-value=0.426). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 5 of 14 FIG S5: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Weighted, non-normalized UniFrac, P=0.086) bacterial communities. This plot represents weighted, non-normalized UniFrac data (Pvalue=0.086). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 6 of 14 FIG S6: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Jaccard, P=0.672) bacterial communities. This plot represents Jaccard data (P-value=0.672). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 7 of 14 FIG S7: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Binary Jaccard, P=0.478) bacterial communities. This plot represents binary Jaccard data (P-value=0.478). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 8 of 14 FIG S8: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Bray-Curtis, P=0.282) bacterial communities. This plot represents Bray-Curtis data (P-value=0.282). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 9 of 14 FIG S9: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Sorensen-Dice, P=0.428) bacterial communities. This plot represents Sorensen-Dice data (P-value=0.428). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 10 of 14 FIG S10: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Euclidean, P=0.270) bacterial communities. This plot represents Euclidean data (P-value=0.270). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 11 of 14 FIG S11: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Binary Euclidean, P=0.117) bacterial communities. This plot represents binary Euclidean data (P-value=0.117). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 12 of 14 FIG S12: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Gower, P=0.139) bacterial communities. This plot represents Gower data (P-value=0.139). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 13 of 14 FIG S13: Plot showing procrustes analyses of transformed PCA of yeast and bacterial communities (Manhattan, P=0.088) bacterial communities. This plot represents Manhattan data (P-value=0.088). The KiNG data file for this and the other comparisons (Table 3) is available through BioTorrents

Page 14 of 14 1. Chandler, J. A., J. M. Lang, S. Bhatnagar, J. A. Eisen, and A. Kopp. 2011. Bacterial Communities of Diverse Drosophila Species: Ecological Context of a Host-Microbe Model System. Plos Genetics 7. 2. Schloss, P. D., S. L. Westcott, T. Ryabin, J. R. Hall, M. Hartmann, E. B. Hollister, R. A. Lesniewski, B. B. Oakley, D. H. Parks, C. J. Robinson, J. W. Sahl, B. Stres, G. G. Thallinger, D. J. Van Horn, and C. F. Weber. 2009. Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75:7537-7541.