A guide to SIMS targeting in difficult samples. WiscSIMS. Department of Geoscience University of Wisconsin-Madison

Similar documents
Electron beam scanning

object objective lens eyepiece lens

h p λ = mν Back to de Broglie and the electron as a wave you will learn more about this Equation in CHEM* 2060

AP5301/ Name the major parts of an optical microscope and state their functions.

CBE Science of Engineering Materials. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

GEOMETRICAL OPTICS Practical 1. Part II. OPTICAL SYSTEMS

Observations Regarding Automated SEM and SIMS Analysis of Minerals. Kristofor Ingeneri. April 22, 2009

Imaging Methods: Scanning Force Microscopy (SFM / AFM)

ECE280: Nano-Plasmonics and Its Applications. Week8

ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES

Modern Optical Spectroscopy

ABC s of Electrochemistry series Materials Characterization techniques: SEM and EDS Ana María Valenzuela-Muñiz November 3, 2011

Record of ancient Martian hydrosphere preserved in zircon from a Martian meteoritie

Experiment 2: The Speed of Light

Raman spectroscopy study of rotated double-layer graphene: misorientation angle dependence of electronic structure

Gold nanothorns macroporous silicon hybrid structure: a simple and ultrasensitive platform for SERS

Physics 476LW Advanced Physics Laboratory Michelson Interferometer

A recyclable supramolecular membrane for size-selective separation of nanoparticles

Fundamentals of Photoelasticity

Measuring with a Microscope

Supplementary Figure 1 XRD pattern of a defective TiO 2 thin film deposited on an FTO/glass substrate, along with an XRD pattern of bare FTO/glass

Fossils in Martian Meteorite: Real or Imagined? Written by G. Jeffrey Taylor Hawai'i Institute of Geophysics and Planetology

Low Vacuum Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis

Cytology: Microscopy

Measuring Microscopic Objects

Louisiana Transportation Research Center

Characterisation of atmospheric aerosol sampled from an aircraft using scanning electron microscopy

Supporting Information

Using Calibrated Specular Reflectance Standards for Absolute and Relative Reflectance Measurements

Nature Protocols: doi: /nprot Supplementary Figure 1

Fadei Komarov Alexander Kamyshan

Environmental Sample Analysis Advances and Future Trends

GSA Data Repository

Initial Results on the Feasibility of Hybrid X-Ray Microscopy

Ecole Franco-Roumaine : Magnétisme des systèmes nanoscopiques et structures hybrides - Brasov, Modern Analytical Microscopic Tools

Optical Instruments. Chapter 25. Simple Magnifier. Clicker 1. The Size of a Magnified Image. Angular Magnification 4/12/2011


Electron Microprobe Analysis and Scanning Electron Microscopy

Chapter 10. Nanometrology. Oxford University Press All rights reserved.

The Basic of Transmission Electron Microscope. Text book: Transmission electron microscopy by David B Williams & C. Barry Carter.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Standardization of Optical Particle Counters

Introduction to Biology

Introduction to Biology

Fundamentals of nanoscience

Mixing in Colliding, Ultrasonically Levitated Drops

Laboratory Manual Physics_1. Index of refraction for solids

Cloudland gneisses, Mars Hill terrane, NC-TN: New SHRIMP U-Pb ages for detrital zircon and. monazite

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Supporting Information. Fast Synthesis of High-Performance Graphene by Rapid Thermal Chemical Vapor Deposition

DR DATA REPOSITORY

Comparison of the Wehner Spots With Angle Distribution Sputtered Atoms Materials

MOCVD Carrier Emissivity and Temperature Uniformity Characterization

Atomic Diffraction Microscope of the de Broglie Waves

Everhart-Thornley detector

GEOLOGY 333 LAB 5. Light Mechanics

custom reticle solutions

Evidence for cavity-dwelling microbial life in 3.22 Ga tidal deposits

Fabrication and Domain Imaging of Iron Magnetic Nanowire Arrays

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Michelson Interferometer

ALIGNMENT OF THE MSGC BARREL SUPPORT STRUCTURE

Ch 2 Part 2. The Microscope

Physical Science Packet Chapter 15: Composition of Matter

Failure Analysis Report

Electrostatic Bonding of Silicon-to-ITO coated #7059 Glass using Li-doped Oxide Interlayer

Brief historical outline

Shock Effects in CML 0175: The Wow Stone

Making Maps on a Micrometer Scale

Imaging Carbon materials with correlative Raman-SEM microscopy. Introduction. Raman, SEM and FIB within one chamber. Diamond.

4. Dispersion. The index of refraction of the prism at the input wavelength can be calculated using

Nature of Light. What is light? Sources of light. an electromagnetic radiation capable of stimulating the retina of the eye.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Visualize and Measure Nanoparticle Size and Concentration

Structure analysis: Electron diffraction LEED TEM RHEED

Chapter 9. Electron mean free path Microscopy principles of SEM, TEM, LEEM

Electron Diffraction

A FEM STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF THE GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF METALLIC FILMS IRRADIATED BY NANOSECOND LASER PULSES

Optics and Telescope. Chapter Six

A Question. Simple Magnifier. Magnification by a Lens 11/29/2011. The last lecture

1986 s Nobel Prize in Physics

T h e Y i e l d M a n a g e m e n t C o m p a n y Electrostatic Compatibility in Photolithography An OEM perspective

Precambrian, Banded Iron Formation (Negaunee Formation) along US-41/M28, south of Coon Lake, Baraga County, Michigan

Optics and Telescopes

Characterization of MEMS Devices

Supporting Information. 15 January, Ms. ID: ac b. Parallel Screening of Electrocatalyst Candidates using Bipolar

These authors contributed equally to this work. 1. Structural analysis of as-deposited PbS quantum dots by Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD)

The Barberton Greenstone Belt (BGB) of South Africa contains some of the world s

An accessory to the polarizing microscope for the optical examination of crystals.

30 MM CAGE CUBE-MOUNTED CIRCULAR POLARIZERS

UV-Vis optical fiber assisted spectroscopy in thin films and solutions

Backscattered Electron Contrast Imaging of Scanning Electron Microscopy for Identifying Double Layered Nano-Scale Elements

Size Determination of Gold Nanoparticles using Mie Theory and Extinction Spectra

An Adaptive Autoguider using a Starlight Xpress SX Camera S. B. Foulkes, Westward, Ashperton, Nr. Ledbury, HR8 2RY. Abstract

6.5 mm. ε = 1%, r = 9.4 mm. ε = 3%, r = 3.1 mm

Commissioning of the Hanle Autoguider

Introduction to Electron Beam Lithography

EDS User School. Principles of Electron Beam Microanalysis

Supplementary Information for. Effect of Ag nanoparticle concentration on the electrical and

MSE 321 Structural Characterization

Transcription:

A guide to SIMS targeting in difficult samples WiscSIMS Department of Geoscience University of Wisconsin-Madison images and text by K.H. Williford, 2012

A zero point is chosen and photographed at low magnification in reflected light, and again a t t h e s a m e ( h i g h e r ) magnification that will be u s e d t o l o g t a r g e t coordinates (see pg. 2). Target coordinates are logged relative to this point (0,0), often a corner of a standard grain near center of the sample. Red cross hairs in this and following images indicate target of interest. 1

This is the zero point photographed at the same magnification (e.g., 20x objective with 10x ocular) u s e d t o l o g t a r g e t coordinates and similar to the field of view on the SIMS microscope targeting system (see pg. 14). The digital stage is set to 0,0 h e r e, a n d t a r g e t coordinates are logged relative to this point. We navigate to this point o n t h e S I M S a n d r e c a l c u l a t e t a r g e t coordinates relative to the coordinates of this point on the SIMS. 2

Target area 1 F i l a m e n t o u s P r o t e r o z o i c m i c r o f o s s i l s i n c h e r t, photographed in transmitted light. A backscattered electron image of target #1a is shown on the following page. In transparent or translucent materials (e.g., chert or quartzite), surface exposure of targets should be verified by reflected light microscopy and electron microscopy. 1b 1a 3

Target #1a F i l a m e n t o u s P r o t e r o z o i c microfossil in chert ( s h o w n i n transmitted light, pg. 3), intersecting the surface of a thin section and imaged at high magnification in backscatter mode o n a s c a n n i n g e l e c t r o n m i c r o s c o p e t o show distribution of organic matter at the surface of the sample. 4

Target #1a After gold coating and loading the sample into the S I M S s a m p l e h o l d e r, targets are photographed in reflected light (e.g., using a 20x objective), and a l l c o o r d i n a t e s a r e relogged to account for any rotation that occurs between initial targeting and inserting sample into S I M S s a m p l e h o l d e r. These coordinates, relative to the zero point are used for targeting on the SIMS, and surface features shown in this image are u s e d f o r a i m i n g. N o organic matter, and few surface features are visible on the surface of this chert sample after gold coating, and care must be taken to acquire sufficient reflected and transmitted (where appropriate) light, as well as backscattered and secondary electron images at various magnifications so that features can be recognized on the SIMS optical system. Faint surface features used f o r t a r g e t i n g ( b y triangulation): i.e., target is o n a l i n e c o n n e c t i n g features a and b, and a c e r t a i n d i s t a n c e f r o m feature c, calculated in a relative sense between this image and image on SIMS optical system. a c Position of microfossil target #1a b 5

Target #1b 6

Target #1b target #1a target #1b 7

Target area 2 2a 2b 8

Target #2a 9

Target #2a target #2a target #2b 100 μm 10

Target #2b 11

Target #2a target #2a target #2b 100 μm 12

Example publication figure showing transmitted light (a, b), secondary electron (c), and backscattered electron (d) images of representative target (2a). Panels c and b are enlargement of target #2a, shown before and after analysis in in panels a and b, respectively. Panel b shows analytical pit, and δ 13 C value ( VPDB) of this microfossil is indicated. High magnification backscattered electron post-analysis pit images of all targets are published in a supplement. 13

Screen capture from the SIMS microscope t a rg e t i n g s y s t e m (field of view 450 μ m ) s h o w i n g 1 5 micrometer spot after analysis. Note the difference in image quality between the SIMS optical system a n d a d e d i c a t e d r e fl e c t e d l i g h t microscope (pg. 1-2), a factor that can c o n t r i b u t e t o difficulty in targeting during the analytical session. 200 μm 15 micrometer spot after analysis. Cesium deposition and beam damage to the coating around the pit causes the spot to appear larger than 15 micrometers. spots made to locate beam position surface features used for aiming 14