Dealing with Zone A Flood Zones. Topics of Discussion. What is a Zone A Floodplain?

Similar documents
ASFPM - Rapid Floodplain Mapping

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NEHALEM RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

LOMR SUBMITTAL LOWER NESTUCCA RIVER TILLAMOOK COUNTY, OREGON

YELLOWSTONE RIVER FLOOD STUDY REPORT TEXT

National Flood Insurance Program

Pequabuck River Flooding Study and Flood Mitigation Plan The City of Bristol and Towns of Plainville and Plymouth, CT

UPPER COSUMNES RIVER FLOOD MAPPING

Discovery Data Questionnaire

Out with the Old, In with the New: Implementing the Results of the Iowa Rapid Floodplain Modeling Project

Appendix E Guidance for Shallow Flooding Analyses and Mapping

ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA

GREENE COUNTY, PA. Revised Preliminary DFIRM Mapping FEMA. Kevin Donnelly, P.E., CFM GG3, Greenhorne & O Mara, Inc. April 10, 2013

Base Level Engineering FEMA Region 6

Las Colonias Subdivision September 2010 Flood Study

VOLUME 3 OF 3 FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER

Community Discovery Data Questionnaire

3.11 Floodplains Existing Conditions

Semester Project Final Report. Logan River Flood Plain Analysis Using ArcGIS, HEC-GeoRAS, and HEC-RAS

Issue 44: Phase II & III H&H Issues Date: 07/03/2006 Page 1

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HYDROLOGY The Electronic Journal of the International Association for Environmental Hydrology VOLUME

Flood Hazard Inundation Mapping. Presentation. Flood Hazard Mapping

Final Results and Outreach Lessons Learned

Using NFHL Data for Hazus Flood Hazard Analysis: An Exploratory Study

Section 4: Model Development and Application

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

Breaking the 5 Mile per Hour Barrier: Automated Mapping Using a Normal Depth Calculation

TOWN OF FORT KENT, MAINE AROOSTOOK COUNTY

Ed Curtis, PE, CFM, FEMA Region IX and Darryl Hatheway, CFM, AECOM ASFPM 2016, Grand Rapids, MI

Hydrologic and Hydraulic Analyses Using ArcGIS

Coastal Flood Risk Study Project for East Coast Central Florida Study Area

McHenry County Property Search Sources of Information

NAVAJO NATION PROFILE

Flood Inundation Mapping

Location: Jacksonville, FL December 11, 2012

Yavapai County Flood Control District. Prescott Valley Mapping Activity Statement Activities (Zone A Floodplain Delineation and Base Map Updates)

GIS Techniques for Floodplain Delineation. Dean Djokic

Applying GIS to Hydraulic Analysis

Zone A Modeling (What Makes A Equal Approximate, Adequate, or Awesome)

Appendix C Fluvial Flood Hazards

YANKTON COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA

Design Hydraulic Study. Bridge 09C-0134, Blairsden-Graeagle Road over Middle Fork Feather River. Plumas County. Prepared for:

Natural and Human Influences on Flood Zones in Wake County. Georgia Ditmore

via via CCTA File /6 Train Avenue West and 70 Yonge Street South, Springwater Natural Hazard Study

DRAFT Design Hydraulic Study. Bridge 04C-0055, Mattole Road Bridge over Mattole River at Honeydew. Humboldt County. Prepared for:

FEMA REGION III COASTAL HAZARD STUDY

Coastal Flood Risk Study Project for Northeast Florida Study Area

USGS Flood Inundation Mapping of the Suncook River in Chichester, Epsom, Pembroke and Allenstown, New Hampshire

Storm Surge Analysis Update Meeting Cross City, Florida June 17, 2014

Flooding Performance Indicator Summary. Performance indicator: Flooding impacts on riparian property for Lake Ontario and the Upper St.

3D Elevation Program, Lidar in Missouri. West Central Regional Advanced LiDAR Workshop Ray Fox

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DISTRICT 3-0

L OWER N OOKSACK R IVER P ROJECT: A LTERNATIVES A NALYSIS A PPENDIX A: H YDRAULIC M ODELING. PREPARED BY: LandC, etc, LLC

Analysis of Hydraulic Impacts on the Schuylkill River

Nebraska. Large Area Mapping Initiative. The Nebraska. Introduction. Nebraska Department of Natural Resources

TSEGI WASH 50% DESIGN REPORT

Appendix C. Questionnaire Summary of Responses Geographic Information Systems

Corps Involvement in FEMA s Map Modernization Program

HYDROLOGIC AND HYDRAULIC REPORT FOR SR. 0522, SECTION 5BN ALONG BLACKLOG CREEK CROMWELL TOWNSHIP HUNTINGDON COUNTY. Prepared for:


Flood Insurance Study

MASON COUNTY, MICHIGAN

Background on the March 13-14, 2007 Flooding in Browns Valley (Traverse County), Minnesota

CAMDEN COUNTY, GEORGIA

FLOOD RISK MAPPING AND ANALYSIS OF THE M ZAB VALLEY, ALGERIA

Summary Description Municipality of Anchorage. Anchorage Coastal Resource Atlas Project

Miami-Dade County Technical Update Meeting South Florida Coastal Study. May 11, 2016

Extreme Phenomena in Dobrogea - Floods and Droughts

New Service Provided by State Agency in Oregon: Base Flood Elevation Determinations

Ground Water Protection Council 2017 Annual Forum Boston, Massachusetts. Ben Binder (303)

A Help Guide for Using gssurgo to Find Potential Wetland Soil Landscapes

Swift Creek Sediment Management Action Plan (SCSMAP)

Embarras River Watershed Digital Floodplain Mapping, Champaign County, Illinois

PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS)

AASHTO Extreme Weather Events Symposium Vermont s Road and Rivers - Managing for the Future

Vermont Stream Geomorphic Assessment. Appendix E. River Corridor Delineation Process. VT Agency of Natural Resources. April, E0 - April, 2004

STREAM RESTORATION AWRA Summer Specialty Conference, GIS and Water Resources IX

Watershed Delineation in GIS Environment Rasheed Saleem Abed Lecturer, Remote Sensing Centre, University of Mosul, Iraq

Flood Hazard Zone Modeling for Regulation Development

Protecting the Storm Damage Prevention and Flood Control Interests of Coastal Resource Areas

Risk Identification using Hazus

1.1 What is Site Fingerprinting?

Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.

Hydraulic and Sediment Transport Modeling Strategy

Roger Andy Gaines, Research Civil Engineer, PhD, P.E.

CLAY COUNTY, MINNESOTA AND INCORPORATED AREAS

USGS Hydrography Overview. May 9, 2018

The last three sections of the main body of this report consist of:

5.2. IDENTIFICATION OF NATURAL HAZARDS OF CONCERN

ArcGIS Online Tools and Water-Related Web Services You Can Use Every Day of Your Life!

North Carolina Simplified Inundation Maps For Emergency Action Plans December 2010; revised September 2014; revised April 2015

Why Stabilizing the Stream As-Is is Not Enough

LIBERTY COUNTY, GEORGIA

2016 NC Coastal Local Governments Annual Meeting

Lecture 10: River Channels

South Florida Coastal Storm Surge and Mapping Study

Open Channel Flow K Subramanya Solution Manual

The Use of Synthetic Floods for Defining the Regulated Volume Duration Frequency Curves for the Red River at Fargo, ND

FLOODPLAIN MAPPING OF RIVER KRISHNANA USING HEC-RAS MODEL AT TWO STREACHES NAMELY KUDACHI AND UGAR VILLAGES OF BELAGAVI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA

Document Title. Estimating the Value of Partner Contributions to Flood Mapping Projects. Blue Book

Field Observations and One-Dimensional Flow Modeling of Summit Creek in Mack Park, Smithfield, Utah

Transcription:

Dealing with Zone A Flood Zones Topics of Discussion Overview of Zone A Floodplains Permitting Development in Zone A Floodplains Estimating Flood Elevations in Zone A Flood Insurance Implications Letters of Map Change Zone A Floodplains Resources for more information 2 What is a Zone A Floodplain? Area of the 1% annual chance floodplain Boundaries have been determined using approximate methodologies No published Base Flood Elevations 3 1

Zone A Challenges Without defined Base Flood Elevations: Lowest floor elevations must be determined for permitting Flood insurance rates may be higher based on unknown risk Benefit cost ratios for mitigation projects may be more difficult to calculate Water surface elevation needs to be estimated 4 Delineating A Zones The paper FIRMs used: topographic maps soils analysis and mapping historical information and high water marks studies not completed by FEMA Digital FIRMS supported by automated hydrologic and hydraulic analyses Not a detailed hydrologic and hydraulic study 5 Zone A Regulatory Requirements Reasonably obtain and utilize any flood elevation data when reviewing and issuing permits If the automated hydrologic and hydraulic analysis (model backed Zone As) are available, use that as best available data Use studies conducted by other federal or state agencies Check to see if elevations have been determined for nearby development Subdivision requirements: Base Flood Elevations must be determined through a detailed study for proposed development larger than 5 acres or 50 lots, whichever is lesser Permits are required for all development 6 2

Obtaining Estimated Elevations 1. Automated hydrologic and hydraulic (H&H) analyses 2. Other sources of data 3. Simplified methodologies Contour interpolation (point on boundary) Data extrapolation Remember, the floodplain administrator can always require a detailed study to establish a true Base Flood Elevation 7 Automated H&H Data Automated H&H analyses were run for Zone As Elevation information exists in the model Not detailed enough to be included on the FIRM Can be used to estimate a 1% chance flood elevation Floodplain Administrators can use this as best available data for permitting in Zone A Zone A cross sections will soon be available online! 8 Availability of Automated H&H www.riskmap3.com or FEMA Engineering Library 9 3

Other Sources of Data When automated H&H unavailable, check for other sources elevation data: Community Records Development plans Letters of Map Amendment (LOMA) for neighboring property State or County agencies Departments of Transportation (plans for nearby bridges) Departments of the Environment (Stream restoration / erosion control projects) Federal Agencies Unpublished USACE, NRCS, or USGS studies Preliminary FIRM data from FEMA of 10 Letters of Map Change in a Zone A If flood elevation data is provided, FEMA will verify its reasonableness If elevation data cannot be provided, FEMA may compute a flood elevation This elevation determination may not be included on the determination letter 11 Reviewing Zone A LOMCs If more detailed data is needed, the applicant may be asked to provide data such as: Culvert/bridge dimensions One or two cross sections If supporting data is provided and is reasonable, it is incorporated into the hydrologic and hydraulic evaluation If additional data is not provided, the determination may be based on more conservative methodology 12 4

Providing Cross Sections For one lot, one cross section is usually sufficient For a large lot or multiple lots, a cross section should be surveyed at each end of the parcel Perpendicular to flow path If property is upstream of a bridge, at least 2 cross sections are required Should capture changes in channel characteristics: slope, roughness, etc. Should reference vertical datum 13 Zone A LOMA Page 1 Page 2 14 LOMC Determination Documents Considerations When Elevations are Displayed The flood elevation used to complete a LOMC determination may or may not be displayed on the final letter. Flood elevations are shown for: Conditional Letters of Map Change Non removal ldeterminations ti Flood elevations are not shown for: Removal determinations Out As Shown determinations 15 5

Resources Visit the FEMA Library for: FEMA 1 98 Use of FIS Data as Best Available Data The Zone A Manual: Managing Floodplain Development in Approximate Zone A Areas FEMA Engineering Library for Models HEC RAS: www.hec.usace.army.mil USGS Stream Stats: http://water.usgs.gov/osw/streamstats/ gov/osw/streamstats/ FEMA GeoPlatform: www.riskmap3.com FEMA Map Information exchange (FMIX) (877) FEMA MAP 16 6

7

500 End of detail study Detailed Methods 8

Managing Development in Approximate Zone A Areas FEMA Publication Guide for Approximate A zone areas Includes method to determine BFE Requirements for Developing BFE Data 44 CFR 60.3(b)(3) of NFIP regulations New subdivision proposals, including mobile home parks Greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is lesser MUST DEVELOP BFE DATA Requirements for Developing BFE Data If land is impacted by Zone A and meets criteria above, (50 lots or 5 acres whichever is less) BFEs must be calculated 9

Subdivision Alternatives May dedicate the entire zone A area as open space lot May not need a detailed flood study in this example Subdivision Alternatives Large lot subdivision may not need detailed study if building site is clearly above elevations of Zone A boundary 10

1 2 3 4 5 11

Hydraulics Normal Depth, Step Backwater Quick 2 12

13

State Floodplain Management Agency (Emergency Management, Natural Resources, Water Resources, etc.) Quick 2 Normal Depth Example Problem Peak discharge, given Determine slope Determine Manning s n from chart and description i of channel and overbanks 14

15

16

17

18

19

Three Cross section Step Backwater 20

Questions??? 21