arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 11 Jan 2011

Similar documents
The dark matter crisis

Theorem : Proof... Pavel Kroupa. Pavel Kroupa: AIfA, University of Bonn

Luminosity function and radial distribution of Milky Way satellites in a CDM Universe

Dark Matter Distributions of the Milky Way Satellites and Implications for Indirect Detection

Effects of SN Feedback on the Dark Matter Distribution

Studying Galaxy Formation with Hubble s Successor

Connecting the small and large scales

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 12 Jun 2004

A tool to test galaxy formation theories. Joe Wolf (UC Irvine)

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.co] 20 Feb 2009

University of Groningen. On the nature of the Milky Way satellites Li, Yang-Shyang; De Lucia, Gabriella; Helmi, Amina

Bright Cluster Galaxy formation and the role of AGN feedback. Romain Teyssier

Origin of Bi-modality

What do we need to know about galaxy formation?

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.ga] 27 Jul 2015

Theoretical ideas About Galaxy Wide Star Formation! Star Formation Efficiency!

Massive black hole formation in cosmological simulations

Dark Matter Dominated Objects. Louie Strigari Stanford

Dwarf galaxies and the formation of the Milky Way

Feedback and Galaxy Formation

Supernova Feedback in Low and High Mass Galaxies: Luke Hovey 10 December 2009

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Dec 2003

A.Klypin. Dark Matter Halos

Connecting Reionization to the Local Universe

Formation and evolution of CDM halos and their substructure

The theoretical view of high-z Clusters. Nelson Padilla, PUC, Chile Pucón, November 2009

Determining the Nature of Dark Matter with Astrometry

Globular Cluster Formation in the Virgo Cluster

Astronomy 233 Winter 2009 Physical Cosmology Week 10 Simulations and Semi-Analytic Models Joel Primack University of California, Santa Cruz

Masses of Dwarf Satellites of the Milky Way

THE BOLSHOI COSMOLOGICAL SIMULATIONS AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS

Understanding isolated and satellite galaxies through simulations

How much of their stellar mass have group galaxies lost to the ICL?

Swinburne Research Bank

Arealistic model for spatial and mass distributions of dark halo substructures: An analytic approach

The Milky Way in the cosmological context. Andrey Kravtsov The University of Chicago

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 21 Mar 2012

Dark matter. Anne Green University of Nottingham

Self-Interacting Dark Matter

Structure and substructure in dark matter halos

IAU Symposium #254, Copenhagen June 2008 Simulations of disk galaxy formation in their cosmological context

Dark Matter Halos of M31. Joe Wolf

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 16 Jan 2012

Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph] 22 Aug 2008

Lucio Mayer ETH Zwicky Prize Fellow

Dark Matter in Galaxies

Too small to succeed: the difficulty of sustaining star formation in low-mass haloes

Structure of Dark Matter Halos

The Milky Way and Near-Field Cosmology

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph] 10 May 2007

The impact of Sagittarius on the disk of the Milky Way

halo formation in peaks halo bias if halos are formed without regard to the underlying density, then δn h n h halo bias in simulations

CONSTRAINING THE MINIMUM MASS OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXIES AND THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE IONIZATION STATE OF THE IGM

Supplements to A Critical Supermassive Black Hole Mass Regulating Galaxy Evolution

Particle tagging and its implications for stellar population dynamics

Fossils of the First Galaxies in the Local Group: True Fossils and Ghost Halos

arxiv:astro-ph/ v2 5 Feb 2004

Central dark matter distribution in dwarf galaxies

arxiv:astro-ph/ v1 19 Nov 1999

Dwarf Galaxies as Cosmological Probes

Recent Progress in Modeling of Galaxy Formation. Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)

An off-center density peak in the Milky Way's Dark Matter halo?

arxiv:astro-ph/ v3 13 May 2008

BARYON DYNAMICS, DARK MATTER SUBSTRUCTURE, AND GALAXIES

Distinguishing Between Warm and Cold Dark Matter

Modelling the galaxy population

Formation and growth of galaxies in the young Universe: progress & challenges

The spatial distribution of galactic satellites in the cold dark matter cosmology

ON THE CHEMICAL EVOLUTION OF THE MILKY WAY. The Metallicity distribution of the halo in the hierarchical merging paradigm

Angular momentum evolution in dark-matter haloes

The subhalo populations of ΛCDM dark haloes

Feedback, AGN and galaxy formation. Debora Sijacki

The Milky Way and Local Volume as Rosetta Stones in Galaxy Formation

Co-Evolution of Central Black Holes and Nuclear Star Clusters

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 19 Jan 2017

Forma&on of supermassive black holes

Connecting observations to simulations arxiv: Joe Wolf (UC Irvine)

Connecting observations to simulations arxiv: Joe Wolf (UC Irvine)

The shape of dark matter subhaloes in the Aquarius simulations

Feedback from massive stars in dwarf galaxy formation

Some useful spherically symmetric profiles used to model galaxies

A unified multi-wavelength model of galaxy formation. Carlton Baugh Institute for Computational Cosmology

pseudo- evolution of halo mass and observable-mass relations Andrey Kravtsov The University of Chicago

Effects of baryons on the circular velocities of dwarf satellites

Coupling small and large scales: how massive and dying stars drive the formation of a galaxy

The Magic Scale of Galaxy Formation: SNe & Hot CGM --> Compaction & BHs

The Iguaçu Lectures. Nonlinear Structure Formation: The growth of galaxies and larger scale structures

The distribution and kinematics of early high-σ peaks in present-day haloes: implications for rare objects and old stellar populations

Joop Schaye (Leiden) (Yope Shea)

Reionization. High-Redshift Galaxy UV Luminosity Function. Axion Dark Matter. Rosemary Wyse

arxiv: v1 [astro-ph.ga] 30 Mar 2015

REIONIZATION HISTORIES OF MILKY WAY MASS HALOS

Hunting for dark matter in the forest (astrophysical constraints on warm dark matter)

The Millennium Simulation: cosmic evolution in a supercomputer. Simon White Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

AGN feedback and its influence on massive galaxy evolution

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph.co] 11 Dec 2013

The Role Of Globular Clusters During Reionization

arxiv: v2 [astro-ph] 29 Jan 2009

Current status of the ΛCDM structure formation model. Simon White Max Planck Institut für Astrophysik

Transcription:

A Universe of Dwarf Galaxies, Lyon 2010 Editors : will be set by the publisher EAS Publications Series, Vol.?, 2017 arxiv:1101.2232v1 [astro-ph.ga] 11 Jan 2011 HOW DOES FEEDBACK AFFECT MILKY WAY SATELLITE FORMATION? Sam Geen 1, Adrianne Slyz and Julien Devriendt Abstract. We use sub-parsec resolution hydrodynamic resimulations of a Milky Way (MW) like galaxy at high redshift to investigate the formation of the MW satellite galaxies. More specifically, we assess the impact of supernova feedback on the dwarf progenitors of these satellite, and the efficiency of a simple instantaneous reionisation scenario in suppressing star formation at the lowmass end of this dwarf distribution. Identifying galaxies in our high redshift simulation and tracking them to z=0 using a dark matter halo merger tree, we compare our results to present-day observations and determine the epoch at which we deem satellite galaxy formation must be completed. We find that only the low-mass end of the population of luminous subhalos of the Milky-Way like galaxy is not complete before redshift 8, and that although supernovae feedback reduces the stellar mass of the low-mass subhalos (M 10 9 M ), the number of surviving satellites around the Milky-Way like galaxy at z = 0 is the same in the run with or without supernova feedback. If a luminous halo is able to avoid accretion by the Milky-Way progenitor before redshift 3, then it is likely to survive as a MW satellite to redshift 0. 1 Introduction The Missing Satellite Problem arose from the discovery that pure N-body simulations of MW-sized halos contain at least an order of magnitude more dark substructures than observed luminous satellites (17, 13). Although this discrepancy has recently been alleviated by the detection of a host of of new MW satellites (14, 29), a non negliglible (factor of a few) overabundance of dark substructures remains. Processes such as reionisation (6, 11, 4, 25) and supernova feedback (7, 3) have been invoked to reduce the number of satellite galaxies by heating and expelling potentially star-forming gas from low-mass halos. To test this claim, we are running extremely high resolution hydrodynamic cosmological resimulations of a MW-like galaxy and its surroundings, improving on the work of other authors (19, 31) by at least an order of magnitude in physical resolution. 1 Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, United Kingdom EDP Sciences 2017 DOI: (will be inserted later)

2 A Universe of Dwarf Galaxies, Lyon 2010 Fig. 1. Comparison of stellar masses of galaxies at z=8.5 in the Cooling and Feedback run whose particles end up inside the MW virial radius at z=0, showing the fractional difference between the values in the two runs vs total virial mass in Adiabatic Run. A positive value indicates that the inclusion of supernova feedback enhances star formation, while a negative value means that it suppresses star formation. The circle size indicates stellar mass (see legend). Red circles indicate halos that survive as MW satellites to z=0; blue circles are completely disrupted by merger events by z=0. In this paper, we address the issue of whether MW satellite formation was complete by the epoch of reionisation or not. In addition, since we run identical simulations, but with and without supernova feedback, we assess the role of supernovae during the formation of satellite galaxies at high redshift. Since our resimulations containing star formation do not reach z=0, we compare our results to observations of MW satellites by twinning the halos containing galaxies in these high-redshift simulations with halos in an adiabatic gas simulation run to z=0. Along the lines of 16, 26, we track dark matter halos to z=0 to determine the properties of surviving halos. We then proceed to quantify the effect of various physical processes on dwarf galaxy formation at high redshift, and determine the importance of such processes in shaping the main properties of the MW satellite galaxies we see today. 2 Numerical Simulations In this work, we analyse three resimulations of a Milky Way-like galaxy from the (Nut) suite of simulations (Powell:2010inprep, in prep) named Adiabatic, Cooling and Feedback. We carry out these simulations using the Adaptive Mesh Refinement code RAMSES (28). All runs contain dark matter and baryonic gas. For the Cooling and Feedback runs, we include metal dependent radiative energy losses by the gas and its heating by a spatially-uniform UV background (12) after z=8.5, along with star formation. The threshold density for star formation is 10 5 atoms/cm 3 with an efficiency of 1%. For the Feedback run, we include supernova feedback, which also enriches the gas with metals. These simulations have a maximum physical resolution of 0.5pc, with a minimum mass of 5.6 10 4 M for dark matter particles and 76M for star particles (10). With this mass resolution we are able to capture individual supernovae, although we still treat star particles as populations of stars rather than individual stars.

Sam Geen et al.: How Does Feedback Affect Milky Way Satellite Formation? 3 Fig. 2. Star formation histories in the Cooling run (left) and Feedback run (right). The vertical line at z=8.5 (look-back time 13.065Gyr) shows the point at which reionisation is turned on in the simulations. The grey region shows the detectable star formation rates as determined by 32. 3 Tracking Halos We identify dark matter (sub)halos and clusters of stars using HaloMaker with the Most Massive Subhalo Method (30). We then associate each cluster of stars to its nearest dark matter (sub)halo. For the adiabatic run, we use TreeMaker (30) to build a halo merger tree of the MW-like halo from our initial conditions to z=0. We then attach all dark matter (sub)halos in the Cooling and Feedback runs to their nearest twins in the Adiabatic run (based on the number of dark matter particles shared between the two halos) for a selection of redshifts before and after reionisation between z=11 and z=8 (10). Using the Adiabatic run merger tree, we track each twinned halo to z=0 and find whether it has survived as an independent halo, as a subhalo of the MW, or has been completely disrupted in a merger with the MW or another halo. We posit that since all our galaxies are embedded within a dark matter (sub)halo, if this host halo survives to z=0 then so does the embedded galaxy. From the 87 galaxies formed in the Feedback run at z=8.5 (just prior to reionisation) we find 13 galaxies survive as MW satellites to z=0, with 4 being destroyed in mergers with other satellite progenitor galaxies (6 in the Cooling run) and 71 destroyed in mergers with the MW (69 in the Cooling run). At z=8 (51 Myr after reionisation), one further satellite galaxy progenitor is formed that survives to z=0. 4 Feedback and Reionisation Comparing the Cooling and Feedback runs, we find that galaxies with total mass under 10 9 M generally exhibit suppressed star formation when our model of supernova feedback is included. By contrast, galaxies with total mass over 10 9 M have similar masses in both runs, with some galaxies showing signs of enhanced star formation when supernova feedback is included (figure 1). The latter is a consequence of enhanced cooling and hence higher star formation rate due to the introduction of metals from supernovae into the interstellar medium. However,

4 A Universe of Dwarf Galaxies, Lyon 2010 Fig. 3. Cumulative velocity dispersion distributions of halos with galaxies and/or star clusters embedded in the Cooling (Blue) and Feedback (Red) runs, tracked to z=0 as explained in section 3. Observations (black line) use data from (15, 1, 2, 33). The simulated data is given as the maximum circular velocity / 2. The error bars represent the sampling error on the data in each bin. supernova feedback does not appear to affect the number of galaxies formed, with roughly similar numbers of galaxies formed in both the Cooling and Feedback run. Further, the same MW satellites are found in both the Cooling and Feedback run when tracked to z=0 as described in section 3. We find that reionisation does not immediately halt star formation, even in the smallest halos, in agreement with 31 (see figure 2). There appears to be a slight downward trend in the star formation rate after reionisation, however. As the simulations continue beyond 200Myr after reionisation, we will monitor whether this trend continues. Since we implement a uniform ionising background, our galaxies cannot self-shield. We plan to address this issue in future studies by including radiative transfer of hydrogen-ionising radiation. 5 MW Satellites Today As described in section 3, we track the halos containing galaxies in the Cooling and Feedback runs to z=0 using the Adiabatic run merger tree. We find that the most important criterion for a halo to survive to z=0 is its redshift of capture, with halos captured before z=3 being completely disrupted by z=0. However, this redshift value may be dependent on the host mass. In figure 3, we compare the observed stellar velocity dispersions to our simulated galaxies dark matter velocity dispersions at z=0 in the Adiabatic run, since estimates of virial mass from observations have typically large errors 33. For all sampled redshifts (z=11 to z=8), we find too few satellites when compared with the observed MW satellites, with better agreement if we wait until lower redshift before sampling the galaxies. Assuming this trend continues, this suggests that satellite galaxy formation is not complete by reionisation. Indeed, we find one galaxy formed between z=8.5 and z=8, after our implemented epoch of reionisation. Furthermore, 14, 29 suggest that the current sample of observed MW satellites is incomplete. Since our runs containing star formation have not reached z=0, we cannot comment on the completeness of our simulations.

Sam Geen et al.: How Does Feedback Affect Milky Way Satellite Formation? 5 6 Conclusions We find that the velocity dispersions of satellites we produce underproduces those of observed Milky Way satellites, suggesting that satellite progenitor formation is not complete by reionisation. Star and galaxy formation continue past reionisation, with little sign of reionisation immediately halting the star formation rate. Supernova feedback reduces the star formation in halos with total mass < 10 9 M, but not the number of galaxies formed. Finally, we find only halos captured after z=3 survive to z=0 as Milky Way satellites. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Romain Teyssier for useful comments and discussions during the work presented here. The simulations were performed on the JADE supercomputer at CINES, France. References (1) Bekki K., Chiba M., 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 356, 680 (2) Bekki K., Stanimirovic S., 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 395, 342 (2009) (3) Benson A. J., Bower R. G., Frenk C. S., Lacey C. G., Baugh C. M., Cole S., 2003, The Astrophysical Journal, 599, 38 (4) Benson A. J., Lacey C., Baugh C., Cole S., Frenk C., 2002, Extragalactic Gas at Low Redshift, 254, 354 (5) Bertschinger E., 2001, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 137, 1 (6) Bullock J. S., Kravtsov A. V., Weinberg D. H., 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 539, 517 (7) Dekel A., Silk J., 1986, Astrophysical Journal, 303, 39 (8) Dubois Y., Teyssier R., 2008, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 477, 79 (9) Dunkley J., Komatsu E., Nolta M. R., Spergel D. N., Larson D., Hinshaw G., Page L., Bennett C. L., Gold B., Jarosik N., Weiland J. L., Halpern M., Hill R. S.,Kogut A., Limon M., Meyer S. S., Tucker G. S., Wollack E., Wright E. L., 2009, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 180, 306 (10) Geen S., Slyz A., Devriendt J., 2011, in preparation (11) Gnedin N. Y., 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, 535 (12) Haardt F., Madau P., 1996, Astrophysical Journal 461, 20 (13) Klypin A., Kravtsov A. V., Valenzuela O., Prada F., 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 522, 82 (14) Koposov S., Belokurov V., Evans N. W., Hewett P. C., Irwin M. J., Gilmore G., Zucker D. B., Rix H.-W., Fell- hauer M., Bell E. F., Glushkova E. V., 2008, The Astro- physical Journal, 686, 279 (15) Mateo M. L., 1998, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 36, 435 (16) Moore B., Diemand J., Madau P., Zemp M., Stadel J., 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 368, 563 (17) Moore B., Ghigna S., Governato F., Lake G., Quinn T., Stadel J., Tozzi P., 1999, The Astrophysical Journal, 524, L19 (18) Murante G., Monaco P., Giovalli M., Borgani S., Diaferio A., 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 405, 1491 (19) Okamoto T., Frenk C. S., 2009, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 399, L174

6 A Universe of Dwarf Galaxies, Lyon 2010 (20) Powell L., Slyz A., Devriendt J., 2010, in preparation (21) Primack J. R., 2009, New Journal of Physics, 11, 5029 (22) Prunet S., Pichon C., Aubert D., Pogosyan D., Teyssier R.,Gottloeber S., 2008, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 178, 179 (23) Scannapieco C., Tissera P. B., White S. D. M., SpringelV., 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 364, 552 (24) Scannapieco C., Tissera P. B., White S. D. M., Springel V., 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 371, 1125 (25) Somerville R. S., 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 572,L23 (26) Strigari L. E., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M., Diemand J.,Kuhlen M., Madau P., 2007, The Astrophysical Journal,669, 676 (27) Taylor J. E., Babul A., 2004, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 348, 811 (28) Teyssier R., 2002, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 385, 337 (29) Tollerud E. J., Bullock J. S., Strigari L. E., Willman B., 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 688, 277 (30) Tweed D., Devriendt J., Blaizot J., Colombi S., Slyz A., 2009, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 506, Issue 2, pp.647-660 (31) Wadepuhl M., Springel V., 2010, eprint arxiv, 1004, 3217 (32) Wilkins S. M., Bunker A. J., Lorenzoni S., Caruana J., 2010, eprint arxiv, 1002, 4866 (33) Wolf J., Martinez G. D., Bullock J. S., Kaplinghat M.,Geha M., Munoz R. R., Simon J. D., Avedo F. F., 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, p. 778