Basis of Design, a case study building

Similar documents
Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

Design of Compression Members

ADVANCED DESIGN OF STEEL AND COMPOSITE STRUCTURES

THE EC3 CLASSIFICATION OF JOINTS AND ALTERNATIVE PROPOSALS

Structural Steelwork Eurocodes Development of A Trans-national Approach

University of Sheffield. Department of Civil Structural Engineering. Member checks - Rafter 44.6

= = = 1,000 1,000 1,250. g M0 g M1 g M2 = = = 1,100 1,100 1,250 [ ] 1 0,000 8,000 HE 140 B 0,0. [m] Permanent Permanent Variable Variable Variable

Made by SMH Date Aug Checked by NRB Date Dec Revised by MEB Date April 2006

Design of Beams (Unit - 8)

Advanced Analysis of Steel Structures

COMPARISON BETWEEN BS 5950: PART 1: 2000 & EUROCODE 3 FOR THE DESIGN OF MULTI-STOREY BRACED STEEL FRAME CHAN CHEE HAN

UNIVERSITY OF AKRON Department of Civil Engineering

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet. Member Design - Steel Composite Beam XX 22/09/2016

Eurocode 3 for Dummies The Opportunities and Traps

DESIGN OF END PLATE JOINTS SUBJECT TO MOMENT AND NORMAL FORCE

Fundamentals of Structural Design Part of Steel Structures

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 10: Technical Software Specification for Composite Beams

7.3 Design of members subjected to combined forces

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL AND COMPOSITE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

PLATE GIRDERS II. Load. Web plate Welds A Longitudinal elevation. Fig. 1 A typical Plate Girder

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

3. Stability of built-up members in compression

REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN 1. Design of Column (Examples and Tutorials)

Bridge deck modelling and design process for bridges

Modeling of welded angle connections in fire

EXPERIMENTAL BEHAVIOUR OF END-PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN JOINTS UNDER BENDING AND AXIAL FORCE Database reporting and discussion of results

Job No. Sheet 1 of 7 Rev A. Made by ER/EM Date Feb Checked by HB Date March 2006

NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF THE ROTATIONAL CAPACITY OF STEEL BEAMS AT ELEVATED TEMPERATURES

Fire resistance assessment of composite steel-concrete structures

STEEL MEMBER DESIGN (EN :2005)

Delhi Noida Bhopal Hyderabad Jaipur Lucknow Indore Pune Bhubaneswar Kolkata Patna Web: Ph:

Influence of residual stress on the carrying-capacity of steel framed structures. Numerical investigation

ON THE DESIGN OF A STEEL END-PLATE BEAM-TO-COLUMN BOLTED JOINT ACCORDING TO PN-EN

THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMPONENT-BASED CONNECTION ELEMENT FOR ENDPLATE CONNECTIONS IN FIRE

ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members

MINLP optimization of the single-storey industrial building steel structure

Plastic Design of Portal frame to Eurocode 3

MS Excel Toolkit: Design of steel-concrete composite columns in accordance with EN

MODULE C: COMPRESSION MEMBERS

On Design Method of Lateral-torsional Buckling of Beams: State of the Art and a New Proposal for a General Type Design Method

Equivalent Uniform Moment Factor for Lateral Torsional Buckling of Steel Beams

DESIGN OF BEAMS AND SHAFTS

Evaluation of the ductility demand in partial strength steel structures in seismic areas using non-linear static analysis

Experimental investigation on monotonic performance of steel curved knee braces for weld-free beam-to-column connections

Karbala University College of Engineering Department of Civil Eng. Lecturer: Dr. Jawad T. Abodi

Advanced stability analysis and design of a new Danube archbridge. DUNAI, László JOÓ, Attila László VIGH, László Gergely

Chapter 6: Cross-Sectional Properties of Structural Members

PREDICTION OF THE CYCLIC BEHAVIOR OF MOMENT RESISTANT BEAM-TO-COLUMN JOINTS OF COMPOSITE STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS

Civil Engineering Design (1) Design of Reinforced Concrete Columns 2006/7

Buckling Resistance Assessment of a Slender Cylindrical Shell Axially Compressed

SUMMARY FOR COMPRESSION MEMBERS. Determine the factored design loads (AISC/LRFD Specification A4).

National Exams May 2015

BASE PLATE CONNECTIONS

Critical Load columns buckling critical load

Compression Members. ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures. III. Compression Members. Introduction. Compression Members (cont.)

Analysis of a portal steel frame subject to fire by use of a truss model

EAS 664/4 Principle Structural Design

9.5 Compression Members

Slenderness Effects for Concrete Columns in Sway Frame - Moment Magnification Method (CSA A )

SECTION 7 DESIGN OF COMPRESSION MEMBERS

C C JTS 16:00 17:30. Lebet

Behaviour of Continuous Beam to Column Connections in Post Earthquake Fire

STRUCTURAL VERIFICATION OF A 60.7 M DOME ROOF FOR TANK FB 2110

A Parametric Study on Lateral Torsional Buckling of European IPN and IPE Cantilevers H. Ozbasaran

AXIAL BUCKLING RESISTANCE OF PARTIALLY ENCASED COLUMNS

Influence of residual stresses in the structural behavior of. tubular columns and arches. Nuno Rocha Cima Gomes

9-3. Structural response

The plastic moment capacity of a composite cross-section is calculated in the program on the following basis (BS 4.4.2):

Finite Element Modelling with Plastic Hinges

STEEL JOINTS - COMPONENT METHOD APPLICATION

Accordingly, the nominal section strength [resistance] for initiation of yielding is calculated by using Equation C-C3.1.

Formulation of Equivalent Steel Section for Partially Encased Composite Column under Concentric Gravity Loading

Steel connections. Connection name : MEP_BCF_W=14.29[mm]_W=6.35[mm]_tp=63.5[mm]_N=0_N=2_N=0_N=1_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[mm]_W=14.29[ mm] Connection ID : 1

Design of Steel Structures Prof. S.R.Satish Kumar and Prof. A.R.Santha Kumar

The University of Melbourne Engineering Mechanics

RSTAB. Structural Analysis and Design Dynamic Analysis. Verification Manual. Ing. Software Dlubal Am Zellweg 2 D Tiefenbach

Displacement-based methods EDCE: Civil and Environmental Engineering CIVIL Advanced Earthquake Engineering

Downloaded from Downloaded from / 1

Fatigue failure mechanisms of thin-walled hybrid plate girders

Detailing. Lecture 9 16 th November Reinforced Concrete Detailing to Eurocode 2

Longitudinal strength standard

Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2014 Design of fixed beam-to-column connection EN :2005/AC:2009

Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation on Steel Plate Girders With Deep Section

VALLOUREC & MANNESMANN TUBES. Design-support for MSH sections

14. *14.8 CASTIGLIANO S THEOREM

3-D second-order plastic-hinge analysis accounting for local buckling

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF THE ROTATION CAPACITY OF BEAM-TO-COLUMN END-PLATE BOLTED JOINT

Job No. Sheet No. Rev. CONSULTING Engineering Calculation Sheet

1C8 Advanced design of steel structures. prepared by Josef Machacek

Available online at ScienceDirect. Procedia Engineering 172 (2017 )

Seismic Assessment of a RC Building according to FEMA 356 and Eurocode 8

Towards The. Design of Super Columns. Prof. AbdulQader Najmi

JUT!SI I I I TO BE RETURNED AT THE END OF EXAMINATION. THIS PAPER MUST NOT BE REMOVED FROM THE EXAM CENTRE. SURNAME: FIRST NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:

5. Buckling analysis of plane structures: simplified methods

Made by PTY/AAT Date Jan 2006

Design of AAC wall panel according to EN 12602

STEEL BUILDINGS IN EUROPE. Multi-Storey Steel Buildings Part 8: Description of member resistance calculator

7.6 Stress in symmetrical elastic beam transmitting both shear force and bending moment

Design of reinforced concrete sections according to EN and EN

Transcription:

Basis of Design, a case study building Luís Simões da Silva Department of Civil Engineering University of Coimbra

Contents Definitions and basis of design Global analysis Structural modeling Structural analysis Case study: building Classification of cross sections

Case study building Cardington Building, UK Total area of 21 m by 45 m and total height of 33 m (8 storeys). 5 bays, each 9 m long by 3 bays of 6 m, 9 m and 6 m. The height of the first storey is 4.335 m from the ground floor to the top-of-steel height. All the other storeys have a height of 4.135 m from top-of-steel to top-ofsteel. 4 A C E A B C D E F 6.00 m 2b 2a 3 2 4.50 m 2.50 m 2.00 m 6.00 m 1 4.00 m 4.50 m 4.50 m 4.00 m Building master example (Cardington - UK)

Global Analysis: case study building Geometric Characteristics of Steel Members Geometric characteristics of the beams (1 st floor) Geometric characteristics of the beams (2 nd floor) Geometric characteristics of the beams (3 rd to 8 th floors) Geometric characteristics of the columns

Global Analysis: case study building General safety criteria, actions and combinations of actions SLS E d 7 = 1.00 x LC1 + 0.5 x (LC2 + LC3). E d 8 = 1.00 x LC1 + 0.2 x LC4. E d 9 = 1.00 x LC1 + 0.2 x LC5. E d 10 = 1.00 x LC1 + 0.2 x LC4 + 0.3 x (LC2 + LC3). E d 11 = 1.00 x LC1 + 0.2 x LC5 + 0.3 x (LC2 + LC3) E d 12 = LC1 + 0.5 x (LC2 + LC3). E d 13 = LC1 + 0.2 x LC4 + 0.3 x (LC2 + LC3) E d 14 = LC1 + 0.2 x LC5 + 0.3 x (LC2 + LC3) ULS i) Combination 1 E d 1 = 1.35 x LC1 + 1.5 [(LC2 + LC3) + 0.6 x LC4] ii) Combination 2 E d 2 = 1.35 x LC1 + 1.5 [(LC2 + LC3) + 0.6 x LC5] iii) Combination 3 E d 3 = 1.00 x LC1 + 1.5 x LC4 iv) Combination 4 E d 4 = 1.00 x LC1 + 1.5 x LC5 v) Combination 5 E d 5 = 1.35 x LC1 + 1.5 [LC4 + 0.7 x (LC2 + LC3)] vi) Combination 6 E d 6 = 1.35 x LC1 + 1.5 [LC5 + 0.7 x (LC2 + LC3)]

Global Analysis: case study building Structural analysis Linear elastic analysis Susceptibility to 2 nd order effects: elastic critical loads 2 nd order elastic analysis For combinations 1, 2, 5 and 6 the values of cr are smaller than 10. According to clause 5.2.1, the frame requires a second-order analysis for load combinations 1, 2, 5 and 6.

Global Analysis: case study building Results for Beam E1 to E4 (4th floor, combination 1) 139.1 kn The internal forces (neglecting the axial 75.9 kn 75.2 kn force) are represented in the figure. The V z,ed design values are M Ed = 114.3 knm and 70.7 kn 71.6 kn V Ed = 75.9 kn. 93.7 knm 111.4 knm 140.1 kn 255.7 knm 246.3 knm 99.2 knm 109.7 knm M y,ed 114.3 knm 113.6 knm 163.0 knm

Global Analysis: case study building Results for column E1 (combination 1) z y 65.5 knm 201 kn 53.0 kn 72.3 knm 29.8 knm 417 kn 41.1 kn 58.6 knm 32.0 knm 630 kn 41.1 kn 57.1 knm 29.3 knm 841 kn 40.2 kn 55.9 knm 27.9 knm 1053 kn 39.3 kn 53.8 knm 29.0 knm Design values are: N Ed = 1704 kn; M y,ed =24.8kNm 1262 kn 43.2 kn 68.6 knm 54.5 knm at the base cross section. 1496 kn 50.5 kn 73.5 knm 10.6 knm 1704 kn 29.4 kn 24.8 knm N Ed V z,ed M y,ed

Classification of cross sections Class 1: plastic cross-sections Class 2: compact cross-sections Class 3: semi-compact crosssections Class 4: slender cross-sections M M pl M el Class 4 Class 3 Class 2 Class 1 s

Classification of cross sections M Rd M pl M el Plastic global analysis Elastic global analysis discontinuity Class 2 Class 1 Class 3 Class 4 c/t M pl M el M eff Semi-Comp, Guimarães 2011

Classification of cross sections Cross section classification is required for: Selection of the global frame analysis: Elastic frame analysis Plastic frame analysis Decision about the type of cross-section verification: Elastic verification Plastic verification Effective cross-section properties Decision on the member buckling formulae with respect to the degree of local plastic capacity: Plastic interaction: class 1, 2 Elastic interaction

Classification of cross sections How to classify a cross section? Classification of each plate elements (in full or partial compression) composing the section. Compare the slenderness c/t with specific limits, established to prevent local plate buckling (Table 5.2 of EC3-1-1). Cross section class = most unfavourable class of all plate elements (flange or web). Cross section class depend of the: slenderness c/t; support conditions (internal or external part); distribution of direct stresses (acting forces); class of steel (higher steel grades sections tend to fall into higher classes). Simple support t Free edge b L

Plate element classification acc. to Table 5.2 235 / f y

Plate element classification acc. to Table 5.2

Acknowledgments Use of material (powerpoint presentations from SEMI-COMP+ Seminar in Guimarães, Portugal, 23.NOV.2011) is gratefully acknowledged. Thank you for your attention luisss@dec.uc.pt