Water Year Day 2010

Similar documents
Snowcover interaction with climate, topography & vegetation in mountain catchments

Surface & subsurface processes in mountain environments

Assessing bias in satellite rainfall products and their impact in water balance closure at the Zambezi headwaters

Snow Melt with the Land Climate Boundary Condition

Presentation Overview. Southwestern Climate: Past, present and future. Global Energy Balance. What is climate?

SNOWMELT MASS AND ENERGY BALANCE ON A STEEP SLOPE

Climate Variability in South Asia

Chiang Rai Province CC Threat overview AAS1109 Mekong ARCC

APPLICATIONS OF DOWNSCALING: HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES EXAMPLES

Lake Tahoe Watershed Model. Lessons Learned through the Model Development Process

Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory (CZO): hydrochemical characteristics, science & measurement strategy

Lecture 6: Precipitation Averages and Interception

Jackson County 2014 Weather Data

Appendix A Calibration Memos

GEOG415 Mid-term Exam 110 minute February 27, 2003

REDWOOD VALLEY SUBAREA

Inter-linkage case study in Pakistan

Disentangling Impacts of Climate & Land Use Changes on the Quantity & Quality of River Flows in Southern Ontario

Jackson County 2018 Weather Data 67 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Jackson County 2019 Weather Data 68 Years of Weather Data Recorded at the UF/IFAS Marianna North Florida Research and Education Center

Database Code: MS001. Title:Meteorological data from benchmark stations at the Andrews Experimental Forest, 1957 to present.

January 25, Summary

The Climate of Payne County

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND SOIL PROPERTIES AT SCAN AND SNOTEL SITES IN UTAH. Karen Vaughan 1 and Randy Julander 2 ABSTRACT

Jackson County 2013 Weather Data

Water information system advances American River basin. Roger Bales, Martha Conklin, Steve Glaser, Bob Rice & collaborators UC: SNRI & CITRIS

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System January 15, 2019

Estimating Evaporation : Principles, Assumptions and Myths. Raoul J. Granger, NWRI

Lecture 5: Precipitation

Quenching the Valley s thirst: The connection between Sierra Nevada snowpack & regional water supply

MARMOT CREEK BASIN: MANAGING FORESTS FOR WATER

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System December 11, 2018

A High Elevation Climate Monitoring Network

Table 1 - Infiltration Rates

ASO in Colorado: supporting resilient water management through research support & emerging partnerships

Flood Forecasting Tools for Ungauged Streams in Alberta: Status and Lessons from the Flood of 2013

Snow II: Snowmelt and energy balance

Inflow Forecasting for Hydro Catchments. Ross Woods and Alistair McKerchar NIWA Christchurch

Lecture 8: Snow Hydrology

Potential indicators of habitat and water quality in the lower Columbia River

Analyzing spatial and temporal variation of water balance components in La Vi catchment, Binh Dinh province, Vietnam

Promoting Rainwater Harvesting in Caribbean Small Island Developing States Water Availability Mapping for Grenada Preliminary findings

The Climate of Texas County

The Climate of Marshall County

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System March 26, 2019

Changing Hydrology under a Changing Climate for a Coastal Plain Watershed

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 13, 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System May 23, 2017

A Review of the 2007 Water Year in Colorado

Climatic Change Implications for Hydrologic Systems in the Sierra Nevada

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 16, 2019

Snow and glacier change modelling in the French Alps

9. PROBABLE MAXIMUM PRECIPITATION AND PROBABLE MAXIMUM FLOOD

Webinar and Weekly Summary February 15th, 2011

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System November 14, 2017

Land Surface Processes and Their Impact in Weather Forecasting

CoCoRaHS Monitoring Colorado s s Water Resources through Community Collaborations

Interaction of North American Land Data Assimilation System and National Soil Moisture Network: Soil Products and Beyond

UWM Field Station meteorological data

Central Asia Regional Flash Flood Guidance System 4-6 October Hydrologic Research Center A Nonprofit, Public-Benefit Corporation

The Climate of Seminole County

Which map shows the stream drainage pattern that most likely formed on the surface of this volcano? A) B)

APPLICATION OF AN ARCTIC BLOWING SNOW MODEL

STATISTICAL ESTIMATION AND RE- ANALYSIS OF PRECIPITATIONS OVER FRENCH MOUNTAIN RANGES

The Climate of Haskell County

5. General Circulation Models

The Climate of Kiowa County

Study of Hydrometeorology in a Hard Rock Terrain, Kadirischist Belt Area, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh

The Climate of Murray County

Effects of forest cover and environmental variables on snow accumulation and melt

Let s Talk Climate! Nolan Doesken Colorado Climate Center Colorado State University. Yampatika Seminar February 16, 2011 Steamboat Springs, Colorado

Flood Risk Assessment

Table (6): Annual precipitation amounts as recorded by stations X and Y. No. X Y

4. THE HBV MODEL APPLICATION TO THE KASARI CATCHMENT

Freshwater. 1. The diagram below is a cross-sectional view of rain falling on a farm field and then moving to the water table.

Geostatistical Analysis of Rainfall Temperature and Evaporation Data of Owerri for Ten Years

Lecture 3A: Interception

The Climate of Bryan County

Thermal / Solar. When air is warmed it... Rises. Solar Energy. Evaporation. Condensation Forms Clouds

NIDIS Intermountain West Regional Drought Early Warning System February 7, 2017

Minnesota s Climatic Conditions, Outlook, and Impacts on Agriculture. Today. 1. The weather and climate of 2017 to date

Modeling of peak inflow dates for a snowmelt dominated basin Evan Heisman. CVEN 6833: Advanced Data Analysis Fall 2012 Prof. Balaji Rajagopalan

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System October 17, 2017

Lecture notes: Interception and evapotranspiration

Development of the Hydrologic Model

YUKON SNOW SURVEY BULLETIN & WATER SUPPLY FORECAST May 1, Prepared and issued by: Water Resources Branch Environment Yukon

YUKON SNOW SURVEY BULLETIN & WATER SUPPLY FORECAST April 1, Prepared and issued by: Water Resources Branch Environment Yukon

Environment Canada Modelling Systems and the 2013 Alberta Floods

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 12, 2019

Precipitation. Standardized Precipitation Index. NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System September 5, 2017

The Climate of Pontotoc County

Appendix E Plots from the Evaluation of the CNRFC Operational Hydrologic Model

2 Precipitation and Evaporation

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System February 6, 2018

NIDIS Intermountain West Drought Early Warning System April 18, 2017

Water Supply Conditions and Outlook June 4, 2018

Presented by Jerry A. Gomez, P.E. National Hydropower Association Northeast Regional Meeting - September 17, 2009

2016 Meteorology Summary

HYDROLOGIC AND WATER RESOURCES EVALUATIONS FOR SG. LUI WATERSHED

SNOW AND GLACIER HYDROLOGY

Transcription:

mm mm SCA, % Storage, mm Sto, 1 mm Sat def, 1 mm 25 2 15 1 5 4 3 2 1 2 5 25 2 Saturation deficit depth (water table) Saturation deficit volume Root zone storage Unsaturated soil storage Groundwater storage Canopy Storage Litter Storage % Sat area 1 Rainfall Snowfall Snowpack 75 %SCA 15 1 5 6 4 2 E + T ET+stream Cum snow Cum Snow + rain Transpiration (T) E + T ET + Sublimation 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3 33 36 Water Year Day 21 2 1 Rain/Snow, mm Snowpack, mm Figure 22: RHESSys output using daily observed temperatures, snowfall and rainfall as inputs. Output variables are snowmelt, evaporation, transpiration, sublimation, Potential ET (PET), Root-Zone (RZ) and unsaturated zone drainage, baseflow, return flow. Also included is the comparison of daily and cumulative observed (obs) and simulated streamflow for Bear Trap Creek in water year 21. 37

mm mm SCA, % Storage, mm Sto, 1 mm Sat def, 1 mm 25 2 15 1 5 4 3 2 1 2 5 25 2 Saturation deficit depth (water table) Saturation deficit volume Root zone storage Unsaturated soil storage Groundwater storage Canopy Storage Litter Storage % Sat area 1 Rainfall Snowfall Snowpack 75 %SCA 15 1 5 6 4 2 E + T ET+stream Cum snow Cum Snow + rain Transpiration (T) E + T ET + Sublimation 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 3 33 36 Water Year Day 21 2 1 Rain/Snow, mm Snowpack, mm Figure 23: Additional model output used for diagnosis and constraining parameters: saturation deficit, snowpack, snow cover area (SCA), evaporation, transpiration, sublimation, root-zone (RZ), unsaturated zone groundwater (GW), canopy and litter storage. (Bear Trap Creek) 38

Temperature ( o C) 35 25 15 5-5 4 1 8 6 4 2 Relative Humidity (%) Rel Hum Max Temp Avg Temp Min Temp Radiation (MJ m -2 ) 3 2 1 Solar Rad Net Rad 5 4 3 2 1 4 8 12 16 Precipitation (cm) Snow Precipitation 24 36 Wind Speed (m s -1 ) 2 16 12 8 4 Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug 3 24 18 12 6 Wind Direction (Deg) Direction Speed 212 213 Solar Radiation (MJ m -2 ) Temperature ( o C) 35 25 15 5-5 4 3 2 1 5 1 8 6 4 2 Relative Humidity (%) Rel Hum Max Temp Avg Temp Min Temp Solar Rad Net Rad 4 3 2 1 4 8 12 16 Precipitation (cm) Snow Precipitation 24 36 Wind Speed (m s -1 ) 2 16 12 8 4 Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug 3 24 18 12 6 Wind Direction (Deg) Direction Speed 212 213 Figure 24. Daily data collected from the upper (Fresno Dome) and lower (Big Sandy) elevation meteorological stations in the Sugar Pine study area for water years 212-213. 39

Temperature ( o C) 35 25 15 5-5 4 1 8 6 4 2 Relative Humidity (%) Rel Hum Max Temp Avg Temp Min Temp Radiation (MJ m -2 ) 3 2 1 Solar Rad Net Rad 5 4 3 2 1 4 8 12 16 Precipitation (cm) Snow Precipitation 12 36 Wind Speed (m s -1 ) 1 8 6 4 2 Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug 3 24 18 12 6 Wind Direction (Deg) Direction Speed 212 213 Temperature ( o C) 35 25 15 5-5 4 1 8 6 4 2 Relative Humidity (%) Rel Hum Max Temp Avg Temp Min Temp Radiation (MJ m -2 ) 3 2 1 Solar Rad Net Rad 5 4 3 2 1 4 8 12 16 Precipitation (cm) Snow Precipitation 24 36 Wind Speed (m s -1 ) 2 16 12 8 4 Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun Aug 3 24 18 12 6 Wind Direction (Deg) Direction Speed 212 213 Figure 25. Daily data collected from the upper (Duncan Peak) and lower (Bear Trap) elevation meteorological stations in the Sugar Pine study area for water years 212-213. 4

6 5 4 3 2 1 Open DouglasFir.UnderCanopy Duncan Peak Met 6 5 4 3 2 1 Open WesternWhitePine.EdgeCanopy RedFir.UnderCanopy Lodgepole.UnderCanopy Duncan Peak Met 6 5 4 3 2 1 Open Pine.EdgeCanopy Pine.UnderCanopy Bear Trap Met 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pine1.EdgeCanopy Pine1.UnderCanopy Pine2.UnderCanopy Bear Trap Met 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pine.UnderCanopy Frazier Creek 6 5 4 3 2 1 Pine.UnderCanopy Bear Trap Creek 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy2 St. Dev. Average WYD 29 WYD 211 Bear Trap Creek All Sensors Figure 26. Daily mean snow depth recorded with a total of 16 sensors in 4 different locations incorporating the variable physiographic characteristics of aspect, canopy cover, and elevation that are present in the study area. 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Water YearDay (WYD) 212 26 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 WYD 213

4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 Open UnderCanopy Open UnderCanopy Open Fir.EdgeCanopy Fir.UnderCanopy Pine.UnderCanopy Open Fir.EdgeCanopy Fir.UnderCanopy Pine.UnderCanopy MixedConifer.UnderCanopy1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy2 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy2 Fresno Dome Met Fresno Dome Met Big Sandy Met Big Sandy Met Speckerman Creek Speckerman Creek Big Sandy Creek 4 3 2 1 4 3 2 1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy1 MixedConifer.UnderCanopy2 WYD 29 St. Dev. Average 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 Big Sandy Creek WYD 211 All Sensors 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 Figure 27. Daily mean snow depth for 211-212 from 18 sensors in 4 different locations, covering physiographic characteristics of aspect, slope, elevation, and canopy cover present in the Sugar Pine study area. Water YearDay (WYD) 212 WYD 213 42

Soil Moisture (vwc) Soil Moisture (vwc) Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1.8.7.6.5.4.3.2.1.6.5.4.3.2.1 Duncan Peak Met Duncan Peak Met Bear Trap Met Open - 1cm Open - 3cm Open - 6cm West - 1cm West - 3cm West - 6cm West - 9cm East - 1cm East - 3cm East - 6cm South - 1cm South - 3cm South - 6cm South - 9cm Soil Moisture (vwc) Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1.6.5.4.3.2.1 Bear Trap Met Bear Trap Creek North - 3cm North - 6cm East - 3cm East - 6cm South - 3cm South - 6cm West - 3cm West - 6cm Open - 3cm Open - 6cm.6 Soil Moisture (vwc).5.4.3.2.1 Bear Trap Creek.6 3 Soil Moisture (vwc).5.4.3.2.1 2 1 Temperature ( o C) 3-cm Soil Moisture 6-cm Soil Moisture Lower 3-cm Soil Temp Lower 3-cm Soil Temp Air Temp. 6 12 18 24 3 36 Water Year Day (WYD) 212 6 12 18 24 3 36 Water Year Day (WYD) 213-1 Figure 28. Soil moisture recorded with 43 sensors in the 4 general study locations. Most sensors were placed at 3- and 6- cm below the surface in a cardinal direction 1 m from the trunk of a tree where snow depth was also measured. A few sensors were placed at different depths for additional observations. The sensors at Duncan Peak exhibited erratic behavior 41 not observed at the other sites, with these time periods removed a limited number of observations were recorded.

Soil Moisture (vwc) Soil Moisture (vwc) Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1.6.5.4.3.2.1.6.5.4.3.2.1 Fresno Dome Met Fresno Dome Met Big Sandy Met Figure 29. Daily soil moisture recorded over 212 and 213 with 46 sensors in the 4 Sugar Pine study locations. Sensors were placed at 3- and 6-cm below the surface in a cardinal direction 1-m from the trunk of a tree where snow depth was also measured. The bottom panels show the mean soil moisture and temperature by sensor depth. Soil Moisture (vwc) Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1.6.5.4.3.2.1 Big Sandy Met Speckerman Creek North - 3cm North - 6cm East - 3cm East - 6cm South - 3cm South - 6cm West - 3cm West - 6cm Open - 3cm Open - 6cm Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1 Speckerman Creek Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1 Big Sandy Creek Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1 Big Sandy Creek Soil Moisture (vwc).6.5.4.3.2.1. 6 12 18 24 3 36 Water Year Day (WYD) 212 25 2 15 1 5-5 -1 6 12 18 24 3 36 29 Water Year Day (WYD) 213 Temperature ( o C) 3-cm Soil Moisture 6-cm Soil Moisture Lower 3-cm Soil Temp Upper 3-cm Soil Temp Lower 6-cm Soil Temp Upper 6-cm Soil Temp Air Temp

Speckerman Discharge and Precipitation (Westfall) 36 Figure 3. Speckerman Creek water-quality data for WY 212 and WY 213. Water temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and discharge are plotted as 15-minute time-interval data from Speckerman Creek. Air temperature was collected at Big Sandy Met and plotted on a daily time interval. Precipitation data are from the Westfall meteorological station operated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Snow depth data are plotted using daily averages and spatial averages of all sensors across the Sugar Pine site. 45

Big Sandy Discharge and Precipitation (Westfall) 36 Figure 31. Big Sandy Creek water-quality data for WY 212 and WY 213. Water temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and discharge are plotted as 15-minute time-interval data from Big Sandy Creek. Air temperature was collected at Big Sandy Met and plotted on a daily time interval. Precipitation data are from the Westfall meteorological station operated by the US Army Corps of Engineers. Snow depth data are plotted using daily averages and spatial averages of all sensors across the Sugar Pine site. 46

Frazier Discharge and Precipitation (Westfall) Figure 32. Frazier Creek water-quality data for WY 212 and WY 213. Water temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and discharge are plotted as 15-minute time-interval data from Frazier Creek. Air temperature was collected at Bear Trap Met and plotted on a daily time interval. Precipitation data are from the Blue Canyon meteorological station operated by the US Bureau of Reclamation. Snow depth data are plotted using daily averages and spatial averages of all sensors across the Last Chance site. 47

Bear Trap Discharge and Precipitation (Westfall) Figure 33. Bear Trap Creek water-quality data for WY 212 and WY 213. Water temperature, conductivity, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, and discharge are plotted as 15-minute time-interval data from Bear Trap Creek. Air temperature was collected at Bear Trap Met and plotted on a daily time interval. Precipitation data are from the Blue Canyon meteorological station operated by the US Bureau of Reclamation. Snow depth data are plotted using daily averages and spatial averages of all sensors across the Last Chance site. 48

Figure 34. Turbidity, discharge, and precipitation data from Speckermen Creek for the fall rainy season, WY 211. 49

Figure 35. Hysteresis pattern progression seen within a multi-rise discharge event at Big Sandy Creek 5

Figure 36. Major cation and anion data for stream water samples from WY s 21-213. 51

Figure 37. Stable isotopes from stream water samples in all four study catchments for WY s 21 to 213. The local meteoric water line (LMWL) was determined based on snow and stream samples from SNAMP watersheds and from Kings River Experimental Watershed. 52

Figure 38. Water year 212 and 213 discharge data for the Sugar Pine and Last Chance sites. 53

Figure 39. Cumulative discharge plots ta for Sugar Pine (Big Sandy BSN, Speckerman SPK) and Last Chance (Bear Trap BTP, Frazier FRZ) sites. 54

cm 25 2 15 1 Sugar Pine Precipitation Big Sandy Creek Speckerman Creek 5 cm 25 2 15 1 Last Chance Precipitation Bear Trap Creek Frazier Creek 5 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 WYD 21 WYD 211 WYD 212 WYD 213 Figure 4. Cumulative precipitation and mean discharge for the Sugar Pine and Last Chance sites. Discharge data were collected at the study watersheds. Precipitation data are from the Westfall (Sugar Pine) and Blue Canyon (Last Chance) meteorological stations. 55

2 SWE (cm) Soil Storage (cm) Discharge (cm) 15 1 5 6 5 4 3 2 1 2. 1.5 1..5 St. Dev Mean St. Dev Mean Bear Trap Cr Frazier Cr. 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 Water Year Day (WYD) 21 WYD 211 WYD 212 WYD 213 2 SWE (cm) Soil Storage (cm) Discharge (cm) 15 1 5 6 5 4 3 2 1 1..8.6.4.2 St. Dev Mean St. Dev Mean Speckerman Cr Big Sandy Cr. 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 Water Year Day (WYD) 21 WYD 211 WYD 212 WYD 213 Figure 41: Water balance components of daily observed snow, soil moisture, and discharge for Last Chance (top) and Sugar Pine (bottom) for water years 21-213. 56

SWE (cm) Soil Storage (cm) 2 15 1 5 6 5 4 3 2 1 2. St. Dev Mean Model St. Dev Mean Model Discharge (cm) 1.5 1..5 Bear Trap Cr Model. 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 6 12 18 24 3 36 Water Year Day (WYD) 21 WYD 211 WYD 212 WYD 213 Figure 42: Regional Hydro-Ecological Simulation System (RHESSys) outputs compared to daily observed water balance components of snow, soil moisture, and discharge from Bear Trap Creek. Final parameterization is ongoing and is contingent upon the incorporation of the LiDAR-derived vegetation data that will be available shortly. 57