Estimation of tectonic velocities using GPS Precise Point Positioning: The case of Hellenic RTK network HEPOS

Similar documents
National Report of Greece to EUREF 2016

Tectonic deformations in Greece and the operation of HEPOS network

Realizing a geodetic reference frame using GNSS in the presence of crustal deformations: The case of Greece

Dealing with significant differential tectonic plate velocities within an RTK-network: The case of HEPOS

Geodetic Department KTIMATOLOGIO S.A. (Hellenic Cadastre) K. Katsampalos, C. Kotsakis Department of Geodesy and Surveying

EUREF Technical Note 1: Relationship and Transformation between the International and the European Terrestrial Reference Systems

An analysis of the Kefalonia seismic sequence of Jan Feb. 3, 2014

NTUA, Faculty of Rural and Surveying Engineering, Dionysos Satellite Observatory, Higher Geodesy Laboratory NOA, Institute of Geodynamics 1

Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade No. 91 (2012), REALIZATION OF ETRF2000 AS A NEW TERRESTRIAL REFERENCE FRAME IN REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Status Report on the Working Group on "European Dense Velocities" Simon Lutz, Elmar Brockmann and members of the EUREF Working Group

THREE SEASONAL BEHAVIOUR OF THE BALKAN PENINSULA GNSS PERMANENT STATIONS FROM GPS SOLUTIONS

Recent GNSS Developments and Reference Frame Issues in Turkey. Onur LENK and Bahadir AKTUĞ

ESTIMATES OF HORIZONTAL DISPLACEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE 1999 TAIWAN EARTHQUAKE

Electronic supplement for Forearc motion and deformation between El Salvador and Nicaragua: GPS, seismic, structural, and paleomagnetic observations

The Santorini Inflation Episode, Monitored by InSAR and GPS

Title: Impact of Regional Reference Frame Definition on Geodynamic Interpretations

Athanassios Ganas,

A new transformation including deformation model for the Nordic. and Baltic countries

GGSP: Realisation of the Galileo Terrestrial Reference Frame

GEODETIC NETWORK OF SAUDI ARABIA AND FIDUCIAL STATIONS. GFN OF Saudi Arabia in Based on ITRF2000 Datum

EUREF 2014 Resolutions. Z. Altamimi, C. Bruyninx, R. Dach, M. Lidberg, M. Poutanen, W. Sohne, J. Torres, M. Greaves

Dimitrios Ampatzidis 1 and Nikolaos Demirtzoglou 2. Introduction

A New Transformation Including Deformation Model for the Nordic and Baltic Countries

Lab 9: Satellite Geodesy (35 points)

GEORED Project: GNSS Geodesy Network for Geodynamics Research in Colombia, South America. Héctor Mora-Páez

arxiv:physics/ v1 [physics.geo-ph] 29 Jul 2004

Determination of Current Velocity Field (Rate) of North Anatolian Fault in Izmit-Sapanca Segment

National Report of Sweden to the EUREF 2004 Symposium

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part II : ITRS & ETRS89 relationship

A comparison of existing and new methods for the analysis of nonlinear variations in coordinate time series

GPS study of N-S trending Karaburun Belt (Turkey) and its E-W trending eastern part

Report for 15th PCGIAP Meeting at 18th UNRCC-AP Working Group 1 Regional Geodesy

Memo : Specifications for reference frame fixing in the analysis of a EUREF GPS campaign

Teleseismic waveform modelling of the 2008 Leonidio event

On the Use of Crustal Deformation Models. in the Management of ETRS89 Realizations in Fennoscandia

Preparation for the ITRF2013. Zuheir Altamimi Xavier Collilieux Laurent Métivier IGN, France

The BIFROST Project: 21 years of search for the true crustal deformation in Fennoscandia

to: Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San

SESSION 1.2 REGIONAL AND NATIONAL REFERENCE SYSTEMS. Rome

CORS Network and Datum Harmonisation in the Asia-Pacific Region. Richard Stanaway and Craig Roberts

Update on the International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) : ITRF2014. Zuheir Altamimi

Global Mapping Function (GMF): A new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data

A Strategic Plan for Geodesy in Sweden. Mikael Lilje Lars E. Engberg Geodesy Department Lantmäteriet Sweden

How GNSS CORS in Japan works for geodetic control and disaster mitigations

Brussels, BELGIUM. Bojan Stopar. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering

Precise Point Positioning requires consistent global products

Case Study of Japan: Crustal deformation monitoring with GNSS and InSAR

GEODETIC EVIDENCE FOR SLOW INFLATION OF THE SANTORINI CALDERA

2. GNSS Measurements

Influence of the Reference Frame Alignment on Station Positions and Velocities: Global or Regional?

Earthquake distribution is not random: very narrow deforming zones (= plate boundaries) versus large areas with no earthquakes (= rigid plate

South Pacific Sea Level and Climate Monitoring Project

Data base of Italian velocities and strain rates at permanent GNSS sites. A. Caporali, M. Bertocco, J. Zurutuza, University of Padova

Slip Rates Estimate of Western North Anatolian Fault System in Turkey

Earthquakes of and successive. A. Caporali and L. Ostini Department of Geosciences University of Padova 2012 EUREF Symposium, Paris France

The Global Mapping Function (GMF): A new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data

The March 11, 2011, Tohoku-oki earthquake (Japan): surface displacement and source modelling

The International Terrestrial Reference System and ETRS89: Part I : General concepts

Gözde AKAY and Haluk OZENER, Turkey

3D temporal evolution of displacements recorded on Mt. Etna from the 2007 to 2010 through the SISTEM method

Case study of Japan: Reference Frames in Practice

A. Barbu, J. Laurent-Varin, F. Perosanz, F. Mercier and J. Marty. AVENUE project. June, 20

The geometry of the Wadati Benioff zone and lithospheric kinematics in the Hellenic arc

Relationships between mass redistribution, station position, geocenter, and Earth rotation: Results from IGS GNAAC analysis

On the use of meteo data. How to raise the value of EPN s

The NKG2008 GPS campaign final transformation results and a new common Nordic reference frame

From Global to National Geodetic Reference Frames: how are they connected and why are they needed?

Monitoring and Analysis

Geodetically observed surface displacements of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake

5. INTEGRATED EXAMPLES FROM REAL EQs.

LONG-TERM TRENDS IN THE AMOUNT OF ATMOSPHERIC WATER VAPOUR DERIVED FROM SPACE GEODETIC AND REMOTE SENSING TECHNIQUES

Widespread Ground Motion Distribution Caused by Rupture Directivity during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal Earthquake

A Multi-Purpose Continuous GPS Network within the boundary zones of the Eurasian, African, and Arabian plates

The Impact of the 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) Earthquake on the Geodetic Infrastructure in New Zealand 1

New Investigations and Contribution to Geodesy of the Italian GPS Fiducial Network at EUREF Analysis Center ASI/CGS

Analysis of the Accuracy of GMF, NMF, and VMF1 Mapping Functions with GPT 50 a Priori Zenith Constraint in Tropospheric Delay Modelling

Kinematic Waveform Inversion Study of Regional Earthquakes in Southwest Iberia

The APREF Project. The Asia-Pacific regional geodetic

FORMAT FOR TECHNICAL PAPERS

INSAR ATMOSPHERIC DELAY MIGITIGATION BY GPS; CASE STUDY IZMIT EARTQUAKE INTERFEROGRAMS

Rigid Plate Transformations to Support PPP and Absolute Positioning in Africa

Analysis of Vertical Velocities from BARGEN Continuous GPS Data at Yucca Mountain, Southern Nevada

CEGRN Consortium. A first campaign took place in Since 1997, each two years, a weekly campaign has been observed, normally in June.

The Hellenic Seismological Network of Crete (HSNC): Monitoring results and the new strong motion network

Article. Ioannis D. Doukas 1 Dimitrios Ampatzidis 2 Vassileios Kampouris 1

COMPARISON OF COSEISMIC DISPLACEMENTS OBTAINED FROM STRONG MOTION ACCELEROGRAMS AND GPS DATA IN JAPAN

TECTONIC MOVEMENTS MONITORING OF SUDETIC MARGINAL FAULT USING SHORT GPS BASELINES

Extending the magnitude range of seismic reservoir monitoring by Utilizing Hybrid Surface Downhole Seismic Networks

The APREF Project: First Results and Analysis

Towards a Rigorous Combination of Space Geodetic Techniques

A Deformation Model to support a Next Generation Australian Geodetic Datum

Actual Continuous Kinematic Model (ACKIM) of the Earth s Crust based on ITRF2014

Geodetic Observing Systems: tools in observing the Glacial Isostatic Adjustment. Markku Poutanen Finnish Geodetic Institute

Using Cascais GPS Permanent Station for geodynamic purposes.

The Size and Duration of the Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake from Far-Field Static Offsets

The Helmert transformation approach in network densification revisited

Aseismic slip and low-frequency earthquakes in the Bungo channel, southwestern Japan

Regional Geodesy. Shimon Wdowinski. MARGINS-RCL Workshop Lithospheric Rupture in the Gulf of California Salton Trough Region. University of Miami

GPS 10, GPS , GPS. (J PL ) Zumbeger. mm, cm ; ( Global RT K) [3 ]

Lesvos June 12, 2017, Mw 6.3 event, a quick study of the source

Transcription:

Estimation of tectonic velocities using GPS Precise Point Positioning: The case of Hellenic RTK network HEPOS M. Gianniou, I. Stavropoulou National Cadastre and Mapping Agency S.A. Mesogion Ave. 288, 15562 Athens, Greece Abstract GPS data recorded at the stations of the Hellenic Positioning System (HEPOS) are processed to estimate station velocities. The Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technique is used to process data spanning from January 2008 to June 2015. A daily solution is computed for each month of the aforementioned time period of 7.5 years. The computed ITRF coordinates are transformed to ETRF2000, so that the estimated velocities refer to ERTS89. Special attention is paid to local effects, like permanent displacements caused by strong earthquakes and the 2011-2012 Santorini volcano inflation. In order to assess the accuracy and reliability of the results, data from six Greek stations of the EUREF Permanent Network (EPN) were processed in addition to the HEPOS data. The PPPderived velocities for the Class A EPN stations were found to be consistent with the velocities estimated by EUREF at the 10-4 m/yr level. These results confirm the suitability of the PPP technique for the estimation of tectonic velocities of permanent reference stations provided that data spanning over several years are available. Concluding, the estimated tectonic velocities are valuable for the ongoing efforts of estimating a detailed velocity field in Europe and developing a strategy to cope with tectonic motions. Keywords: Tectonic velocities; Precise Point Positioning; ETRS89; HEPOS. 1. Introduction Greece lies in the boundary region between the Eurasian and the African plate. In addition, the southern part of the country lies on the Aegean plate, a smaller plate which is moving southwest (Papazachos et al., 2000). Furthermore, Greece is the seismically most active area in Europe. Strong earthquakes often cause permanent displacements leading to discontinuities in the time-series of the stations coordinates. This situation leads to a complex and inhomogeneous velocity field which plays a critical role in the operation of HEPOS. The problem of maintaining a reference frame in seismo-tectonically active areas is being studied at international level. In this context the EUREF Technical Working Group has set up two initiatives: the EPN densification project and the EUREF Working Group on Deformation Models (Bruyninx et al., 2015). The changes in the geometry of the HEPOS network as a result of the different station velocities have been investigated already during the first two years of operation of the network (Gianniou, 2010). In order to study in detail the velocity field in Greece the National Cadastre and Mapping Agency (NCMA S.A.) analysed 7.5 years of HEPOS data and estimated precise velocities for the network stations. This article describes the dataset used, the processing strategy, the obtained results and their validation. Special attention is paid to the effect of geological phenomena like earthquakes and volcanic activity. 2. Dataset The dataset used for the estimation of the velocities consists of a total of 104 reference stations, i.e. the 98 HEPOS stations and six Greek EPN stations. The EPN stations offer an excellent opportunity to validate our results, as highly accurate velocities are published by EUREF for the

Class A EPN stations. Among the six used Greek EPN stations, four stations are of Class A (AUT1, DUTH, PAT0, TUC2) and two stations are of Class B (LARM, NOA1). According to the EPN website Stations are in Class B because of a short time frame of SINEX availability or a higher noise level (including the seasonal variability) of the position time-series. In particular, stations NOA1 and LARM are characterized as Class B due to noisy observations (http://epncb.oma.be/ _productsservices/coordinates/classb_noisy.lst). Although for Class B stations no velocities are published by EUREF we chose to include LARM and NOA1 in the computations, as they allow us to evaluate the PPP-solutions under challenging conditions. The locations of the 104 stations used in the project are shown in Fig. 1. The seventh Greek EPN station DYNG was not incorporated in the processing, because it was included in the EPN computations just in late 2013 (DOY 293), whereas the HEPOS time-series are considerably longer, starting in 2008. Table 1 summarizes the details concerning the time span of the processed data. Fig. 1 The locations of the 104 reference stations included in the computations. Table 1 Data span of the processed data Stations Observations Network # Station code Time period Duration (years) HEPOS 98 001A-098A 2008.0-2015.5 7.5 EPN Class A 4 AUT1 TUC2 DUTH PAT0 2008.0-2015.5 2008.0-2015.5 2008.7-2015.5 2009.1-2015.5 7.5 7.5 6.8 6.4 EPN Class B 2 NOA1 LARM Total 104 2008.0-2015.5 2011.1-2015.5 7.5 4.4

Easting (m) 3. Processing strategy The GNSS data were processed using the Precise Point Positioning technique (Zumberge et al., 1997; Héroux and Kouba, 2001) in static mode and the CSRS (Canadian Spatial Reference System) PPP software. Dual frequency phase observations were used together with IGS final precise orbits (sp3 files) and clocks (clk files) (Kouba, 2003). The ionosphere free linear combination was used to reduce the ionospheric error, while the tropospheric zenith delay was estimated. The processing interval was 30s and the elevation mask 10 o. Instead of processing each day of the available data one daily solution was computed for each month. Thus, a time-series of 90 solutions was produced for each of the 101 stations having full data availability (2008.0-2015.5; see Table 1). For the stations DUTH, PAT0 and LARM the time-series consist of 82, 76 and 55 solutions, respectively. As known, the PPP-estimated coordinates are expressed in the reference frame in which the precise satellite orbits are expressed. Due to the long time span of the processed observations, the precise orbits and consequently the results were expressed in two different frames, namely ITRF2005 (IGS05) and ITRF2008 (IGS08, IGb08). In order to have all results expressed in the same frame, the ITRF2005 coordinates were transformed into ITRF2008. Afterwards, the ITRF2008 coordinates were transformed into ERTF2000 (Boucher and Altamimi, 2008). The ETRF2000 coordinates were projected into the main zone of TM87 projection of the national Coordinate Reference System GGRS87 (Greek Geodetic Reference System 1987) (Katsampalos et al., 2010). Before estimating the horizontal velocities, the time-series of the coordinates were inspected for discontinuities of any kind. As expected, discontinuities in the time-series were found for stations in areas where earthquakes and other geological phenomena took place in the time period under consideration (2008.0-2015.5). Detailed results are given in the next section. 4. Results With the exception of certain stations affected by geological events like earthquakes the vast majority of the obtained time-series are characterized by clear trends. In the following, representative examples of the produced time-series are given. 4.1 Ordinary time-series Fig. 2 - Fig. 4 depict the time-series for three stations of different horizontal velocities. Fig. 2 refers to a station of relatively small velocity (0.0023 m/yr), Fig. 3 refers to a station of moderate velocity (0.0104 m/yr) and Fig. 4 refers to a station of high velocity (0.0297 m/yr). The solid red lines in Fig. 2-4 represent the linear trends calculated by means of least squares. From Fig. 2 it comes out that the length of the time-series (7.5 years) is sufficient to estimate reliable horizontal velocities, even in the order of 2 mm/yr. 694105.34 4611377.72 4611377.71 694105.33 4611377.70 4611377.69 694105.32 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 4611377.68 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Fig. 2 Time-series for Easting (left) and Northing (right) for a station of relatively small velocity: HEPOS station 021A in northeastern Greece.

Easting (m) Easting (m) Easting (m) 210221.65 210221.64 210221.63 210221.62 210221.61 4297522.27 4297522.26 4297522.25 4297522.24 4297522.23 4297522.22 4297522.21 4297522.20 4297522.19 4297522.18 Fig. 3 Time-series for Easting (left) and Northing (right) for a station of moderate velocity: HEPOS station 060A on Cephalonia Island, Ionian Sea. 334980.16 334980.14 334980.12 334980.10 334980.08 334980.06 334980.04 334980.02 334980.00 4195961.40 4195961.35 4195961.30 4195961.25 4195961.20 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Fig. 4 Time-series for Easting (left) and Northing (right) for a station of high velocity: HEPOS station 013A in northern Peloponnese. 4.2 Time-series with discontinuities due to geological phenomena On 24 May 2014 a shallow and strong M w 6.9 earthquake occurred in northeastern Aegean Sea near Samothrace Island (Evangelidis, 2015). The earthquake caused significant permanent displacements of seven HEPOS stations in the wider area of the epicentre (Saltogianni et al., 2015). One of the mostly affected HEPOS stations was station 089A on the island of Lemnos. The effect of the earthquake can clearly be seen in Fig. 5 that gives the coordinates time series for station 089A. For the estimation of the velocities of the affected stations only the solutions up to epoch 2014.39 were considered, as indicated by the solid red line in Fig. 5 for the case of station 089A. 602497.26 602497.24 602497.22 602497.20 602497.18 602497.16 602497.14 602497.12 4417924.43 4417924.41 4417924.39 4417924.37 4417924.35 4417924.33 4417924.31 4417924.29 4417924.27 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Fig. 5 Time-series for Easting (left) and Northing (right) of station 089A on Lemnos Island, affected by the 2014 Samothrace, North Aegean Sea earthquake.

Easting (m) Another geological event that influenced the produced time-series is the 2011-2012 inflation of the Santorini volcano (Papoutsis et al, 2013). Fig. 6 gives the coordinates time series for station 048A which is located on the island. For each horizontal coordinate two different velocities have been computed; one velocity before the start of the inflation and one velocity after its end. These velocities are shown in Fig. 6 with purple and red colors, respectively. It is worthy to mention that the estimated velocities before and after the event are practically the same. In the case of Easting they differ 0.2 mm/yr and in the case of Northing they differ 0.1 mm/yr. 631108.22 631108.20 631108.18 631108.16 V E = -0.0160 m/yr V E = -0.0158 m/yr 4027656.30 4027656.25 4027656.20 4027656.15 4027656.10 V N = -0.0308 m/yr V N = -0.0309 m/yr 631108.14 4027656.05 Fig. 6 Time-series for Easting (left) and Northing (right) of station 048A on Santorini Island, affected by the 2011-2012 volcano inflation. Dashed lines denote extrapolation of the linear trends outside of the estimation intervals. Besides the 2014 Samothrace earthquake and the 2011-2012 inflation of the Santorini volcano three other events were considered for the estimation of station velocities. Table 2 summarizes the geological events of which the effects have been removed. Table 2 Geological phenomena considered for the estimation of stations velocities Event Date Area Type 1 14/2/2008 Methoni Earthquake (Mw 6.7, D: 35 km) 2 8/6/2008 Andravida Earthquake (Mw 6.4, D: 31 km) 3 26/1/2014 Earthquake (Mw 6.1, D: 16 km) Cephalonia 3/2/2014 Earthquake (Mw 5.9, D: 5 km) 4 24/5/2014 Samothrace Earthquake (Mw 6.9, D: 11 km) 5 2011-2012 Santorini Volcano inflation 4.3 Velocity field The estimated horizontal velocities for all stations participated in the project are depicted in Fig. 7. The obtained velocity field is consistent with previously published results (Nyst and Thatcher, 2004; Chatzinikos et al, 2013) and has the advantage of being based on homogeneous data set, i.e. uniformly distributed stations and long time-series (90 monthly solutions spread over 7.5 years). It is worthy to mention the wide range of the estimated velocities, which spans from the sub-mm/yr level to more than 3 cm/yr, as it is summarized in Table 3. Clearly, Greece is not only the country with the highest ETRS89 velocities in Europe 9 (Gianniou, 2010), but also the country with the highest differences in the velocities. Table 3 Minimum and maximum estimated ETRS89 velocities Station Area Horizontal velocity Remark 039A Corfu Island, Ionian Sea 0.0009 m/yr Smallest velocity nation-wide 063A Southwestern Peloponnese 0.0363 m/yr Highest velocity nation-wide

Fig. 7 Estimated horizontal velocities in ETRF2000 for HEPOS stations (red arrows) and EPN Class B stations (green arrows). For comparison reasons the velocities published by EUREF for the EPN Class A stations are also shown (blue arrows). 4.4 Validation of the results In order to validate the reliability of the results, the estimated ITRF2008(IGb08) velocities of the four EPN Class A stations were compared to the velocities published by EURF (EPN cumulative solution C1875). The comparison results are summarized in Table 4. As can be seen, the estimated velocities agree with the velocities published by EUREF in the order of 10-4 m/yr. Table 4 Comparison of PPP-derived and published ITRF2008 velocities (in m/yr) for the EPN Class A stations EPN Station EPN velocities (m/yr) (EPN_A_IGb08_C1875.SSC) PPP velocities Differences V X V Y Y Z V X V Y Y Z DV X DV Y DY Z AUT1-0.0149 0.0208 0.0041-0.0152 0.0212 0.0035 0.0003-0.0004 0.0006 PAT0 0.0016 0.0088-0.0047 0.0019 0.0086-0.0053-0.0003 0.0002 0.0006 DUTH -0.0168 0.0186 0.0088-0.0168 0.0193 0.0083 0.0000-0.0007 0.0005 TUC2 0.0029 0.0100-0.0095 0.0030 0.0106-0.0093-0.0001-0.0006-0.0002

The velocities estimated for the two Class B EPN stations are shown in Fig. 8 together with the velocities of the nearby HEPOS stations. Fig. 8 Estimated horizontal velocities in ETRF2000 for EPN Class B stations AUT1 and TUC2 (blue arrows) and nearby HEPOS stations (red arrows). 5. Conclusions The processing of 7.5 years of data from the HEPOS and the EPN networks with the PPP technique offered a detailed and accurate velocity field for Greece. The estimated PPP velocities agree in the order of 10-4 m/yr with the velocities published by EUREF for the EPN stations. Taking into account that the produced time-series consist of one daily solution per month denotes that using data spanning over several years, even a daily solution per month can be sufficient for achieving highly accurate velocities. The obtained velocity field demonstrates clearly that Greece is the country with the highest ETRS89 velocities in Europe and also the country with the highest differences in the velocities spanning from the sub-mm/yr level to more than 3 cm/yr. Important role in the determination of station velocities play geological phenomena like earthquakes and volcanic activity. The impact of such phenomena must be well studied and removed from the timeseries in order not to affect the estimation of the velocities. Acknowledgments The GNSS data of the EPN stations were retrieved from the EPN website (http://www.epncb.oma.be/). The HEPOS project was co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the Operational Program Information Society. References Boucher, C., and. Z. Altamimi (2008), Memo: Specifications for reference frame fixing in the analysis of a EUREF GPS campaign. Bruyninx, C., Z. Altamimi, E. Brockmann, A. Caporali, R. Dach, J. Dousa, R. Fernandes, M. Gianniou, H. Habrich, J. Ihde, L. Jivall, A. Kenyeres, M. Lidberg, R. Pacione, M. Poutanen, K. Szafranek, W. Söhne, G. Stangl, J. Torres and C. Völksen (2015), Implementation of the ETRS89 in Europe: Current Status and Challenges, International Association of Geodesy Symposia, DOI 10.1007/1345_2015_130, Springer Verlag, pp. 1-11.

Evangelidis, C. P. (2015), Imaging supershear rupture for the 2014 Mw 6.9 Northern Aegean earthquake by backprojection of strong motion waveforms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, doi:10.1002/2014gl062513. Gianniou, M. (2010), Tectonic deformations in Greece and the operation of HEPOS, EUREF 2010 Symposium, Gävle, Sweden, June 2-4 2010. Héroux, P. and J. Kouba (2001), GPS precise point positioning using IGS orbit products, Phys. Chem. Earth Part A, 26(6 8), 573 578, doi:10.1016/s1464-1895(01)00103-x. Katsampalos, K., C. Kotsakis and M. Gianniou (2010), Hellenic Terrestrial Reference System 2007 (HTRS07): a regional densification of ETRS89 over Greece in support of HEPOS, Bollettino di Geodesia e Scienze Affini, Vol. LXIX, N. 2-3, 2010, pp. 329-347. Kouba, J. (2003), Measuring seismic waves induced by large earthquakes with GPS, Stud. Geophys. Geod. 47(4), 741 755. Papazachos, B., G., Karakaisis, C. Papazachos and E. Scordilis (2000), Earthquake triggering in the North and East Aegean Plate Boundaries due to the Anatolia Westward Motion, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 27, No. 23, pp. 3957-3960. Papoutsis, I., X. Papanikolaou, M. Floyd, K. H. Ji, C. Kontoes, D. Paradissis and V. Zacharis (2013), Mapping inflation at Santorini volcano, Greece, using GPS and InSAR. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(2), 267-272. Saltogianni, V., M. Gianniou, T. Taymaz, S. Yolsal-Çevikbilen and S. Stiros (2015), Fault slip source models for the 2014 Mw 6.9 Samothraki-Gökçeada earthquake (North Aegean Trough) combining geodetic and seismological observations, J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 120, 8610 8622, doi:10.1002/2015jb012052. Zumberge, J. F., M. B. Heflin, D. C. Jefferson, M. M. Watkins and F. H. Webb (1997), Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks, J. Geophys. Res., 102(B3), 5005 5017, doi:10.1029/96jb03860.